Mangled Thoughts

Posted by D
Herald Sun, 25/9, Michael Harvey gave a brief mention of a recent speech by Beazely. The main thrust is not novel and something embraced by the parties lodged in parlaiment. Ditto, `One Nation’. Tried to hunt up the full text and a link but nothing yet.The only remarkabale thing about the speech is the candour with with which Beazley sets out his national socialist vision for Australia. Again, not peculiar to Captain Kockup.It states something, however,which the German government under Bismarck first perfected and since is something of truism: warfare, increases in coercive power of central government, central planning powers, and induction , entrenchment, and expansion of the `social welfare state’, are engaged simultaneuosly..

Beazely blared:

a) `For the war on terror to be one, national unity is essential…’
b) `The government must stop playing politics with national security’.
c) `…it must stop dividing the nation through the destruction of social services’.
d) Natioanl unity , through, health , education, etc, and this `requires levels
of public spending and investment, (therefore) the government must stop
putting token tax-cuts into people’s pockets.’
e) `The near valueless tax-cuts of the current budget should have been spent
in… (including0 a coastguard….’

f) `Natioanl unity’ is needed because the `war on terror’ `threatens to be
longt and difficult’.
g) Tax cuts is declared to be government `splurging ‘ which is trivial in the
effects, unlike government consumption.

The speech is titled: Labour Forte: “Governing for all in a time of war.”

The candour is contained Captain Kockup’s explicit connection between war and natioanl socialism. In this regard, `environmentalism’ and government regulations and central control over capital investment is metaphorically justified as a `war’ to fight and `anthropogecens’, preventing them, one might say, `terrorising nature’ whatever the f… `nature is’.
In a 2002 speech to the ALP, Beazely said soemthing to the effect, debate over means of `social control over capital’ obscures the `national socialist objectives of the party.’

I’ve labelled each of his staements in his recent speech for ease of fisking in shorter notes than this to be posted now and again.That Beazely should have been sacked from parlaiment altogether for: handing billions of earners capital taken by theft over to another pack of communistos the Sewdish government,and more on the stuff up submarine `factory’ in mendicant city Adelaide, and for acquiring a kock-up of a submarine when there were superior English and U.S. subs ready to sail straight from shipyard is something which draws attention to Beazely’s fitness to have held ministerial office at all. But it figures, communistos crap opver all and sundry and then laud what a great sacrifice they make in `serving’ in the parlaiment, taking up , as he said in 2002, the burdens of office.

The above shows, Captain Kockup’s surname is Blowhard but it is a neat statement why consume and tax governments are nasty bits of work . To this, the Coalition government is just another hue of national socialism which , in its consumption and tax ( rob and extort) ways, also buggers markets,punishes capital and entrepenuers as it executes its variation on the same theme which, Mr.Blowhard so candidly laid out.
(Continued)