Mangled Thoughts

Posted by D
Brookes.news has evoked a stunningly disclosure from channel nine’s news room per one of its spokesman ,on the matter of lying about opinion polls on British reception of the Bush’s visit to Britain.

The spokeesman replying , its only mere opinion.

Having canned Fat Aunty Bolshevik Collective, it is the case, nonethless, as Brookes points out with telling regularity other newspapers and broadcasters strive to equally prove themselves selective and even downright liars.

The commercial news reports tend to distort rather more discreetly but still transparently, as in newsreaders according to each item pouts, smiles, looks up set. In other words, informing, by changing expressions on the mugs of airheads, the politically correct position viewers take. One doesn’t believe one whit one is imagining it. Because intrigued one has studied closely the airheads and, yes, for stories of the smae type they do have a particular expression or two accordingly.

Test it yourselves if your are not convinced. I , obviously am. But even if not so, the fact they pout, smirk, wink, sob whatever, is highly offensive, presumptious. Moreover, what if some items are not as the grimacing airhead might convey, are not tragic, or correct, or heroic, sad, or even happyu. Damn, the commercials, like FAT ABC , clerics and the coteries of IRC do hold adults in contempt. I suggest to them each and all they really are qualified to wear a dog collar or `teach’in the wondrous zoos euphemistically called schools.
(Continued)

Posted by D
The Nazi regime did not arise ex nihilo or because of some right wing conspiracy,the Nazi Party was promoted as a German socialist party. The background is more mundane and disturbingly some things have their parallel viz local, states and federal govt today. Frederick’s Prussia of Macht and Recht expressed through the two pillars of Army and Bureaucracy became the linchpin of Bismarck’s united germany.In Germany nor France, for that matter, nothing like English Common Law had become established, the explanation ultimately rooted in the origins of `modern Europe’, the early feudal Age, gangsters who over-rode the emergence of open markets and complementary tradition of law in the wake of the end of the Roman Empire. Govt. in short, orginates in warfare and extortion , the `protected’ being rather more the ones threatened and subjugated by their new overlords.It is why the history of Europe is history of absolutist regimes , economic autarchy and rule by Govt. dictat expressed through detailed administrative control of the lives and interests of those the govts of Europe do not serve, with the exception of Switzerland backed by the well appreciated threat of govt. excersing physical violence against citizens viz criminal charges, fines, imprisonment for no compliance with the capricious dictats of govt. And, folks, this is what both the major parties of Australia have done when in office, bestowing police state powers on mere clerks like ATO and novelties like the ACCC.Last night, I listened to a summary of recent bills and legislation which increase those coercive powers,and is only consistent with measures the coalition govt. has already had passed.

It was only accidental that one was apprised of the full ramifications, if the speech is correct, of the Govt.’s IR `reform’ bills , legislation already passed and measures which have been and can be effected merely at the adminstrative level.I was feeding at the trough witha party of friends when , taking a breather heard a speaker to members of the Industrial Relations Society.

The speech was fair enough in a fresher pass level summary essay type of way. The content was illuminating, mainly because one hasn’t followed the IR measures closer than what can be gleaned from the news.I mentioned the content to some one who is a who’s who of the who’s who of the learned profession , suggesting one would blog on it, give the IR club a boot up their totalitarian pants. The distinguished who’s who commented, good idea and remarked further, the Society of Industrial relations is in need of a good booting up the buttocks too. Righto, I said, much encouraged, I will blog and be damned.So, let’s set to it, out with the heavy leather shoes and boot some butts.

The general view of the govt’s. `IR reforms’ , runs on the claim it is about freedom of contract between employees and employers. This might not be quite the case. What, to summarise the main contention put by the speaker,is being put up involves several things: in fact increasing government control over labour markets and contracts by actually increased abministration viz, detailed regulation; the speaker used the managerialese cant expression `micro-managing the work place’.

A second expression used was `third party’ , an ugly vulgar mistatment of what the speaker stated, Industrial Commission and govt. depts. and agencies who have interventionist control over actions which, to be blunt and crude, is otherwise none of their fucking business.

The telling point is, the substitution of AWAs and other such measures for IRC market fixing is just that, a mere substitution.Indeed, to cover enforcement of the new measures, the kangaroo court and its bunch of chicken oracle consultants has in any case beed given a new lease of undeserved life by being bestowed the power to enforce AWA’s.

The speaker claimed, employees are in need of `third party’ interference lest not only they be screwed by unscrupulous employers but also the only inference one can draw, the IR club regards adult Australians as infantile retards to dumb to distuingish a bad employer from one who is not. Thiss, however, overlooks, employees are not bound to employers like vassal salves , they can go work for someone else, and some do for that sort of reason. Though the force of the speaker’s comment pertained to contracts of employment which, one surrises the IR club regards as too weighty for many to comprehend.

Right what is a contract: terms; price; split of price between cash, super, leave and matters which might be peculiar to working in a particular business. In other words, cutting through gobbledygook of `enterprise bargaining’ and AWAs and IRC mandated terms, the reality on straight waged and salary jobs , employment agreements are bloody trivial document s to write up.

As for price,employees seeks though most they can earn employers the least they can but neither can dictate price. Many employers seeking labour, many seeking jobs. Next,as BrookesNews.com and VonMises contributors reiterate frequently, employers pay what the marginal value of labour to product is worth to that firm.If employees are to enjoy better returns, what is required is free open economy matched by low consuming low taxing non inflating govt so that more capital is put up and so more jobs. Moreover, capital as `lattice work of stages of production’ driven by the final use, consumption. A more prosperous people is those who demand products which require higher stages of production and thus generates beeter jobs, more opportunities and because production and consumption of goods is the definition of income, better income. Better income cannot be decreed by govt. fiat, whether by IRC club nor directly as BOB Brwonb and his bunch of commies the greens seem to believe, following Bolt’s article in the Sun on the Greens platform.

The speaker used the expression, `rule of law’ and again in a vulgar sense. He was addressing, on this line, government regulation and supporting legislation. To diabuse the Society of Industrial Relations, Government regulation and its expression, administrative control by bureaucracy, is not the rul of law, it is Govt. fiat, dictat, the beginnings of totalitarianism.Indeed , what the speaker presented is a case indicative of not only the ALP’s approach but is also the bipartisan position of the coalition parties,of one more instance of te overthrow of common law in favour of govt. dictat.Just to check, the measure raised by the govt. include, according to the speaker, the bestowal of more police powers to ATO, ACCC and any other agency used to enforce the new regime of regulation.

The above, taken with the mountain of new administraticve decrees has peculiar force, for what is being mounted is actually quite detailed control over individuals, their actions, their interests.In other words, the meassures have nothing to do with liberty.Broken down, the coalition is not about serving what freedom of contract boils down to, freedom of action, at all.If that were case, in fact the govt. would have to relinquish its accumulating coercive power and let things run with only common law judges competent to rule on conentioous contracts.

Just to check,in common law has been developed general prinicples bearing upon `unlawful contract’ , but that is not what neither major party has in view. Along with increasing numbers of the learned profession, the parties are basically treating common law as an irritating frustation to their power hungry ambitions.

I put to to Brookes.News and Von Mises Insitute, that thirst for absolute power is why, at the end of the day, the parties snear theory ( of, in this case action)in favour of `pragmatism’: pragmatism , as Bertrand Russell pointed out, is nothing but a cult of power.

The speaker pointed out, the govt. stopped short of what infact should be done, finishing of the Industrial Relations Commission altogether. The reason is contained in the measures, they require the `third party intervention’. Exceet the third party includes more police powers to both ATO and ACCC.An irony , the speaker pointed out, buyt nonethless can be made to work.

One inferred, from the remarks: if only they had consulted the industrial relations experts in the first place, the obvious would have been better handled from the start, namely `third party provisions’.Of course he would say that, for `industrial relations ‘ experts’ and the IR club the whole lot of them, make their fat livings on what is nothing but the overthrown of markets and common law, and treating all and sundry outside their all too cosy coteries as idiot serfs who must be told what to do, bossed about and treated, generally, like juveniles.

Without the extortion and racketeering called `industrial relations’ the whole IR club would have to do something productive which genuinely serves others. This is what the userers fear, someone might have the balls to kick them off their generous unearned joy ride . They have a vested interest in perpetuating something which is nothing but a sign of little tin pot dicators, and the Coalition obliges and generously, for, you see, it means more power to govt. more excuses to wield police powers against so many, more coercive power to dictate, hector and corrupt things which are none of the business of govt and the stuffed jumped up clerks in ATO and the IRC club, thugs of the unions and those companies all to content to collude with the govt. in the mistaken assumption they will do better as a consequence.

Could Australians wake up one fine Spring morning to find a full blown totalitarian regime has landed on their heads? You betcha, and each of the parties in each level government are culpable. The liberal party aint a liberaL party, it too is a socialist party along with ALP, Greens Dems and One Nation, and is doing its best in laying down the foundations for outright tyranny.
(Continued)

Posted by D
Without the penchant of governments for stealing what is not theirs in truckloads by the second, types like those of ATO would be today what they were until that pair of Spivs fell into office, Hawke and the great wanking machine lever puller, Keating, clerks, go fers. Take away such heady titles as ,admin.officer, class bumbledee, or, secretary of bumpf,and that is all they were and still are, except for one thing.Types like ATO gorilla man and of other departments of morality like EPA, ACCC , have been handed police state powers. Some readers might seem that is far-fetched police state powers. It is not, they are real and enough have already been on the receiving of the jackbooted clerk and not simply as pollies with an eye to invoking mob rule claim, `corporate crooks’ and the `rich’, which underpins why rule by governmental dictat and not common law is capricious and utterly vicious in force.
With the above in view, one cheers on all those ho manage their own super who are not filing all the bumpf ATO jumped up gorilla clerk man demands. Go to buggery Carmody and co you bunch of unproductive twits of the ilk Bonhoeffer disdained, the ductile craven halfwit who bemoaned his bad lot in prison despite himself having done is duty as gorilla man.

The straight super policies are a sitting target for tax extractions and god, there are a lot of them.A friend receives regular letters from the spivs in ATO declaring they’ve whacked said friend for penalties for, having too much in earnings. Go to hell Carmody you theiving little rat.

Packer was dead right in his comments afterhigh court found tax filing has nothing to do with mollifying some spirit of tax regime ( which ATO officers claimed publicly after the decision was handed down). That is, the impact of the tax regime applies to all and sundry, not just a few.

Bye the bye, the tax file number is used as a national id card. This and the demand under threat of police action for non compliance in the matter of financial institutions handing over identity of customers and accounts and details is itself totalitarian in force. So what if there is privacy legislation, it remains , the government is in breach of common , and overthrows liberty by such measures, which is why there are now hectoring little tin-pot dictators like ATO man let loose in Australia. They, along with bozos in Vic. state govt, local councils EPA and every other nannying bullying department of bullshit should be sacked and one wouldn’t give a damned if they starved and lived in destitution for the rest of their miserable useless lives.
(Continued)

Posted by D
The awesome duo, Bracks and Brumby , ably assisted by a cast of sidekicks on treasury benches, slowly sink beneath a stinking financial mess of their own making, as new revelations pour out of various offices.

Meanwhile, poor old taxpayer and `public transport’ traveller will stump up more for more payroll.this is merely a sideshow, as the awsome supergoofs sink, and a number of stinks smell like the get rich schemes the Cain -Kirner govt speculated taxpayers money on, to make up for the contraction of the real economy. The latest joke, after windmills and other drivel, is the new airline. Oh joy.If I were Branson, I’d be beside myself in uncontrollable fits or laughter.

I can hardly wait for the duo’s next stunt.
(Continued)

Posted by D
Constantine converted the Church form a tradition of which the terms of f association were liturgy and confession of faith rooted in belief in Christ and Trinity into administrative apparatus of Imperial government. The force of this emerges thus: the Roman Empire was not simply a world government by militiary might and administrative dictat , it was religious empire the pinnacle of which was the Imperial cult. Religion in the strict definition of the word and not the hazy feel good sense with wombats use it. To illustrate, Islam, communism and other such regimes which run on superstious-mythic beliefs about reality which bolster abslotutist capricious regimes which, it is assumed , are charged with some mystical power and imperative to enusre some divinely or not so divinely (Marx and Hegel and Comte) dictated order. Government orginated as a protection racket - waging war and threating war against those the self appointed `holy men’ claimed to serve if they did not submit , something which is delineated with stark clarity of the early feudal period which laid the foundations for not only the medieval period but `modern europe’.God and some `divine necessary’ order was invoked to prop it all up, since few in the ancient past were impious and so did not wish to be considered evil-doers.

The belief Rabbinic Judaism was a legalistic religion, based on the caricature of an interpretation of the Pharisees and what they might have or might not observed from the NT, and the Talmuds and subsequent rabbinc commentaries , is utter rot. The great rabbinic collections, in any case were wrtten from the 2nd century and on, rabbinic Judaism , a lay `movement, was synogugue based. The legalism attributed to the pharisees is based on merely literary works in which so called statements of `legal rulings’ are merely rhetorical and allusive in force onyl. However, until the second Roman-Jewish war, Judaea was subject to the religious regime of Royal court and Temple .

Deuteronomy , though a literary work, reflects the religious background inclusive of economic autarchy and rule by dictat , anchored in the agrarian economic interests of aristocrastic families including high caste priestly families. Nothing novel in that, as far as great deal of the history of civilization goes. Indeed ,Rome was economically decadent, Romans were subordinated to the interests of slave worked estates, the economic linchpin of the Roman Army and power base for the poliically ambitious, as well as taxes collected from subject cities.In this, along with administrative dictat, instead of economic liberty is the explanation why so many Romans were destitute and like so many even in Australia today relied on handouts by the government.

Back to Constantie, he made the Christian cult the cult of the empire and the Church an instiution of government. Quite a contrast, the reason why Chrisitianity was decalred an illicit religion in the 2nd century rests on the definition of religion: a new religion thus coud only ean one thing , a pack of thugs out to overthrow the government and impose their regime, something which until Constantine Chrisitians repeatedly stressed was a false perception of Chrisitans and their motives and practices, stressing the preyed for the good health of Emperor ,and the continuance of the Pax Romanum.

Constantine changed all that and in doing so, the pastoral way suddenly became a great careerah move for ambitious young men, over against the army as the route for high office. There were added benefits. Relgious institues were exempt from taxation and other encumbrances imposed on estate owners, army commanders, and other types. It was aslo a safer occupation, far less likely to be assasinated.

Old hands of the Church held nothing but contempt for the new arrangemnt and the new cleric, pungently remarking what a fine life it is to be cleric these days with the added bonus, one could pass on parishes and dicoceses and all ecclestical property and revenues to son and heir.

Nothing cahned really since. This mornig a Mr. Nick francis, `Executive Director’ of Brotherhood of St. outlined his associations to religious order. Did so by claimning government must spend money on looking after people and helping businesses create oppportunities for the unemployed and the destitute.

That so many are unmeployed and some sunk in unhappy circumsstances has everything to greedy theiving all consuming governments, constriction of markets and so forth, seems to entirely escape Francis.

Equally odious, not Chrisitian is his assertion the association is committed to raisding `solutions’ but not their execution which is the responsibility of government by taxation and transferring the revenues into schemes devised by central government and types like himself. It seems a christian is a christian is one in name only.
Heaven forbid Chrisitans whether each off their own bats or in collaboration becasue something can be better done because of more resources, without hitting `taxpayer’ and imposing more central planning, and ,more measure which corrupt markets. That Chrisitians, if they are so concerned to help people who might benefit from direct muscle to change their lives, now seems to be some kind of heresy.

Might be, no , it is. After all, each denomination is guilty of heresy, the gnostic type ,in unifying the socialist beleifs of Plato, Comtes, the infantile notions of Rousseau with Marx and some others and declaring it to be the definition of the creed.. The Churches seem to be convinced, the Holy Spirit is coda for some mysterious lumpenmasse man residing in so many merely material bodies.

A rather witless position to occupy, no physics for a start. It underpins, however, why the clerics detest the individual as some foul ideology, irrespective of the christian faith first and foremost asserts the primacy and dignity and integrity of the individual, and certanly so over mob rule.Or is that item merely, for clerics a mere trivial and redundant detail. Contrast their assertion of autonomy which amounts to , the individual is at liberty only in trivial matters, free so long as they obey the group and the littlepooh bahs who run them.

Then there is a curious contradiction which suggests to one, hypocrites. The churches seem committed to salvationism through socialist economics, citing the Sermon on the Mount and Deuteronomy as the two great docotroal dissertations proving that is indeed god’s holy scheme.Take out goody and what is left, the churches are committed to a very materialistic conception, god will come to poeple once the socialisto economic order of things is perfectly realised. Moreover, the inference is clear enough, unlike `secular-atheistic’ sociliast progroms, this will work, the reason is, goddy is dictating to them from high up all the details on how to make it work , like Francis’s schemes, amounting to nothing but a divinised notion of socialism.

The churchs’ commitment to socialism has the rather unholy explanation from religion. The churches are major beneficiaries from the extortion and racketeering ways of government. Some power hungry clerics too. Why, after all, bother with more modest circumstance4s of the apostolic way when careerah and personal gaqin can be made out of administering the great schemes of government? And, by god, the notion some clerics are meek, mild selfless types is rot, marked by not only careerahism but complaints they are underpaid.

A bishop of Adelaide wailed loudly about how injust the federal govt is on the folowing occasion. Some refugees landed in Adelaide. Unused rooms of a convent were supplied as accomodation to the refugees. Laity stumped up with supplies of various things until the new arrivals had landed jobs and standing on their own two feet.

So what was the crime, chrisitians showed generosity to new arrivals, did so on a very cost effective basis. The crime was, the government should have stepped in and per usual truck loads of money do what apparently what is forbidden to chrisitans to do.

Tehn the GST debate,clerics claiming if applied to some types of church revenues would amount to persecution of the Church.Utter crap, GST or any tax has no bearing on belief nor freedom of worship and association in Australia.

The churches are not christian and because freed of the burden of extortionate racketeering governments and the greedy selfish interests who support thhe scams which is most of what government is into, they of course like other vested interests, do not have to face the consequences, of god almighty confiscating corrupting government. The churches are not chrisitan, and they are mainoly run by spivs pretending to be apostles.Sanctimonious bs. occurios as an apt epithet.
(Continued)

Posted by D
Saint Nicholas brought joy to some children each year giving presents to them once a year out of his own little all.Adults like to dress up as his namesake one festive eve each year to treat children.

In last Friday’s/Thursday’s ( I forget which edition) Herald Sun, Bracks is quoted on his reaction the Auditor General’s report on the government’s finances.Included is this gem: Bracks accused the Kennett govt. of having been miserly in its expenditures, including payroll.Nice generous Mr.bracks overlooks one moral difficulty, playing Santa with other’s money extorted from them in so many nefarious ways is criminal, immoral, an act which lays burdens on many so Bracksie Wacksie and his fellow spivs in Spring St. can taste the joys of making so many Victorian children in adult size `happy’. You are not Santa Bracksie, oh , and Brumby neither.You are a pair of politicians who were directly complicit in the Cain -Kirner govts. which sent so many Victorians out onto the streets as destitutes and for the very same reasons why your budgets far from being models of prudence will sling many Victorians back out on to the streets once again.

They are ably assisted by councils who scream poverty when it comes to their raison de tre , maintaining local roads, but have oodles of money, 53%of their annual budget some spivs of some councils cried on garbage like `community services’. Bracksie Wacksie has of course passed on the AlP theiving habits onto councils, thinly disguising oly some of the damage the govt. is guilty of.

The Auditor’s report, however, is rather old news. On the matter of payroll the news is far more grave than the A.G.’s remarks suggest.Back around June,July, a report was issued, showing the absolute value of Australian govts. of all tiers increasing exponentially while those in real wealth generating businesses declining, yes, exponentially.

The A.G. commented, Vic govt.’s payroll has been increased at rates faster than revenues, and alluded to the long-term implications , ie. liabilties entailed.Victorians not on govt. payroll are getting poorer, directly, and indirectly.The latter because of the consequences for prices of consumer goods, employment and investment in capital.

Directly, because, to pay for the spiv duo’s Santas Bracksie and Brumby spending spree, more of what businesses and their employees earn has to be converted into cash so the govts. growing army of professional mendicants can squester a lot of other things besides.Something must give sooner or later.

Probably sooner, if one adds on stuff ups like Saizeray ,closure of forestry and the many consequences that are now just emerging in ugly detail,windmill farms along the coast, declaring apropos out of nothing but to keep the savages the greenies happy and urban nimby wombats equally supine in that infant’s state of pleasure. Over on top of building restrictions, read economic usage of urban land n.b. in particular councils,hikes in payroll per increases in payroll tax, stamp duty, `morality laws’ and so forth, which altogether poinbt out what a pack of communisto spivs they really are.

There is another nasty spin off from such not generous types us the half wits in Spring St. Last week the head of the reserve expressed concern rising pay-packets could spark a surge in inflation. Three things which that man conviently omitted to mention. Inflation is due to govts. printing money, that the federal govt. has inflated money on 1996 by a whopping 60%, in order tompay for its own largesse, is staggering and appalling.Pay rates of those engaged in the real wwealth generating economy has no force viz risk of inflation. Govts. forcing up payroll by payroll taxes, super and other imposts , on the other hand cuts how many people can be employed. But governments spending sprees is the spark of inflation.

The problem on the count of payroll is governments like the thugs in Spring St. increasing its cost absolutely and in 2 ways, the sheer number of additional mendicantas it has hired, the absolute increases in the amounts it pays each and every one of them. And there is the catch, for are start, national currencies are jsut fiat money, not title to any commodity, in short they are just chits of sequestration so govts. and their armies of mendicants can walk out and take your property for zilch.

And we see the dilemma which arises out of Bracks and Brumby playing Santa to its enlarged army of mendicants, the probability of inflation since the issue of so much unearned income is unpaid, prices will further rise to absorb it. Victorians are well on the way to poverty street.Not that the Reserve Bank is much interested in such malfeasance of governments.After all, the whole rasion de tre of the Reserve is to prop up fiat money and the spending spree habits of govts. including, the federal govt on so many things from the scams which are medicare and `education’ to much else besides.

As for all those `children ‘ who are so so happy at what fat Santa Vic ALp govt. has brought them: well kiddies, enjoy it while you can, they’re only toys which are made to break very quickly, and one will certainly entertain no sympathy for you when the day of reckoning arrives. Not least because, you over-sized tiny tots ensure a govt which is driving Vic.s back onto poverty street holds office. Rember kiddies winkies, your Santa is a commie spiv.
(Continued)

Posted by D
All Blacks and Blues struggled for the great prize of deciding whether a loser can be defined by degrees, 3rd or 4th position loser.Not agame worth commenting on much at all but for the French penchant for subtlety.

The nuance of their tactics nearly eluded the noggin but the brilliant deviousness of their pplan is now in plain view. they aimed to wear down and break the All Blacks be repeatedly kicking the ball deep into the N.Z.’s lines, forcing to stroll back to collect the ball and stroll forward again. All that to-ing and fro-ing is exhausting. The eyeballs felt it, they were plain tuckered in having to follow the troops make their way over acres of ground.

The Blues made a killer stroke, a flash of inspiration some might say like string a match in rain, fzzsp,damn.They scored, overthrowing what was left of All Black resistance.
By gum the French are subtle, terrifyingly so.

The French coach peered intently down upon the horrible,physical punishment his blues were dealing the blacks.He was waiting, it was clear from the expression on his face, for the breakthrough, the moment for the big push.

And it was effective, so much so, the All Blacks, irritated, worn down, had to stroll across the try line, several times, in order to gain a few moments reprieve from the onslought.
(Continued)

Posted by D
Tim Blair has a post on Britains “Stop the War’ Coalition”. The `coalition’ lacks a sense of irony, in a chilling sort of way, as accusing Bush and, presumably by inference, the coalition’s soldiery in Iraq, of mass slaughtering of babies.Their witlessness is confirmed by another `peaceful protest’ against Bush in the streets of London.

The ghost-ghouls burned an effigy painted bronze of Bush. Very subtle, they must be graduates of a post-modern deconstruction arts kindergarten, for the bronze paint is a conceit equating Bush with Saddam and, by inference, G.O.P. with the former Baath regime.

The ghost-ghouls should take a baath.
(Continued)

Posted by D
If nasty capitalist pig west is so terrible, communistos might migrate to more hospitable climes,claim indeed refugee status.With the Soviet Union down the gurgler,Baath overthrown in Iraq, they can consult their Idyll Guide - every communist’s bible on where to find Shangri-la and choose between Communist Cuba or no less Zimbwabe.In either paradise they can enjoy sunshine from within a prison in a cell littered with filth and a snail’s diet of inedible food, for the great crime of being civilised types and not agreeing with the government.And neither lard bottomed Mugabe and pin -up hero of some lefties in the Democrat party including Hilary Clinton are racsist as to who is thrown into their gulags.

The animal liberation front has in common, along with its parent party, the greenies , hold a great deal in common with pol pot in holding a vision of a return to nature and the overthrow of evil capitalism.Hannhauser has demonstrated his dedication to the greenies’ pol potian cause in tipping minced pork into sheeps’ drinking water, hoping that would stop a one way cruise.

Firstly, the jokes on him. It wont’ stop the booked export of the sheep. And, of course, sheep don’t eat meat - the punch line being, Hanhauser’s belief becuase of Jewish Kosher rules and the Islamic equivalent, the mid-east won’t be able to take the sheep full stop;dead wrong.Islamic Council President,Yasser Soliman observed, at worst only only a few days grace is required and the sheep can be eaten.

Soliman, last night, also pointed out the obvious,it is economic sabotage,and a major violation of private property, those who own the sheep.This gets up the communistos nostrils no end.last night on the idiot box, Hannhauser mentioned `our sheep’, news to me since they belong to those who own them.Hannhauser might rteflect is anything he owns also everyone else’s property too , is any one freepig meat for brains Hannhauser to use your house, take it from you, your income, heck even the scrungy clothes you wear? what about your computer, the pens you use, what about toothpicks in your larder and the beer in your fridge. Hannhauser has no objections, if he is consistent, his neighbours should help themselves, freely, to his chattels, that’s if they’re worth taking.

Hannhauser’s views are not peculiar to himself. Bolt in today;s H.S. quotes the Victorian animal liberation front’s ( front for the greens or is it vice-versa) statement of their platform:`Animals are not the property of others’… `just as we reject rascism,sexism,ageism,homophobia, we reject specieism.’Fat Aunty Bolshevik Collective understands this little credo thoroughly and concurrs, it must it provides a free propaganda service for the green’s which pumps that garbage out, Planet Slayer.

I call it `Planet Slavery’, the real force of environmentalism. Amusingly, one of the `planet slayers’ is himself about to be slayed on criminal charges, at long last, Hannhauser. The judge will, hopefully, recommend the polpotian boor be thrown into prison and the cell key lost, for -ever and no tradesman found to cut the cell door off.

Not only hannhauser, but the greenies can rot, stew, and starve.One recommends to them ports of pernmanent call, cuba and Zimbabwe. Heck, life in capitalist west might be, for some, purgatory, but it sure aint the sort of stinking hell holes they and, also fatty Adams and Hilary Clinton, and a few lefties in the Victorian Alp so much admire.
(Continued)

Posted by D
Medicare is just one of the many rackets run by federal, states, and local governments to justify two interrelated evils, the extortion racket called taxation and increasing coercion by regulation,both backed by threat of quasi-legal froce against citizens.But what is the force of taxation?

Richard Teather, in an rticle on `Why job-creation schemes don’t work’, points out , each $50,000 collected in taxes causes real economic losses in the order of $130,000 per annum.The loss is before the damage caused by government consumption, regulation and controls over markets and suppliers, the economic distortions caused by government consumption, the losses imposed because of governments inflating the fiat money like the $aussie dollar and additional losses due to the coerced imposition of fiat moeny and related matters such as fractional banking.

Thge figure is shocking. For a start, the so-called services governments p[rovide like schools, medicare, childcare, and other wombat freebies, cost far more than what is delivered is worth. But then add in the losses imposed by tax collected and economic distortions, and the reality is, what gots. do in the name of `national unity’ is nothing but evil in force.
(Continued)