Not anti-semitism, just murderous hatred of the Jewish people.
Wednesday, February 25, 2004
Posted by D
To sum up some of the comments from the Encounter programme, anti-Judaism is a fantasy of Jews trapped in `victimhood’ due to their traditions saturated by memories of persecutions and massacres.Fantasies `internalised’. That this psycho-soiciology babble, and they, psychology and sociology is nothing but charlatanism, they are not science ( with all due respect but on this, James Randi, in the case of psych. you are mistaken, seriously so).
Tim Blair has drawn attention to a site observing the Guardian’s use of expletives, a world leader on this score.
Down below is an excellent article on the U.N.’s record in fomenting hatred of the Jews in general councils, committees, conferences and NGO’s. Taken with the hatred of not a few in the middle-east for the Jewish people, and no less disturbing the apparent willingness to use such sentiment for political advantage, such sentiments expressed on Encounter and threaded to dleiver the implicit conclusion, the problems of Arabs and Islamo-fascists and the people who suffer under those nasty regimes is all Israel’s fault and the motivation of that, Zionism and Jews’ self pity, show up for the utter bilge they are. This, before also factorooing in the bilge of pyschology and sociology.
Thanks to Ombudsgod for drawing attention to a fine article by Anne Bayefsky,
on the U.N. and its propagation of hatred of the Jewish people, The U.N. and the Jews. I shall just cite some passages which are telling for the item which will be completed by posting PartIII,It’s All the Israeli’s-Jewish People’s Fault.
By Palestinians and others, Israelis are now routinely condemned with Nazi terminology?current resolutions speak of the “Judaization” of Jeru salem?or are themselves likened to Nazis. As the Algerian representative recently observed, in an especially memorable outburst
At the [2001 UN Durban conference on racism and xenophobia?s] NGO forum, the Arab Lawyer?s Union freely distributed books containing cartoons of swastika-festooned Israelis and fanged, hooked-nosed Jews, blood dripping from their hands. Another best-selling title was The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Hundreds of flyers were distributed with a picture of Hitler and the words, “What if I had won? The good thing?there would be no Israel.” Appeals to the conference?s secretary-general, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson, to demand the removal of this anti-Semitic literature went unheeded…
The position of the U.N. is unambiguous, as statements Bayefsky quotes affirm, Jews are intruders who have forced out the `native inhabitants, `palestinian arabs’ and Israel, thuse guilty of robbing them of their `inalienable rights’.
A senior U.N. official declared the Durban conference a success. Delgates to the conference, to mark, having yelled `killers’ against Jewish delegates, and issued , what is more, threats against them, including against Jewish youths at the conference.
Ireland, Bayefsky, relates had a record of supporting Israel and resolutions condemning violence against Jews and parties responsible for it. Not any more, Ireland no longer supports such resolutions because, they are not germane to anti-rascism.
In 2003 alone, the UN bureaucracy generated 22 reports and formal notes on “conditions of Palestinian and other Arab citizens living under Israeli occupation.”
Anne points out, Israel is the only county on which the U.N. has raised a committee dedicated to the investigation of Israel.
And the position of the World Council of Churches is no less discreditable, though not surprising in its pro-socialist/communist anti-capitalist position which it has asserted, stridently, over the decades of its existence.Marking also the WWC is also an admirer of those polpotian communists the greenies.
Well worth a read:
Anne Bayefsky: through ombudsgod or this:
Read both.
An `internalised’ `mental’ guilt ridden tradition bound groundless fantasy indeed.But that crap is also par for the course at ABC, SMH, Moa’s little Red Age, The Australian and the U.S. equivalents. As also the line the Jews are intruders/conquistadors who mericlessly oppress `palestinian arabs’ and kill them for that motive. Anne lists all the countries whose regimes are guilty of real oppression, of murder, of fanning violence and more who have not been condemned by the U.N. and not subjected to the intense scrutiny to which Israel is, let alone have committees dedicated to the investigation of each of them.The list includes the fat savage of Zimbabwe … has the U.N. investigated Castro and his commie regime. And what was the U.N.s concern over Iraq, not the Iraqi people, but the Coalition’s decision to eliminate a thoroughly rotten regime.This is such a striking contrast it shows how rotten the U.N. is. Why in the fuch are Oz taxpayers robbed of money to prop up a pack of scumbug scoundrels the U.N. is an outregous puzzle.