Joan and Darby? Ken and Barby? Mork and Minda? Whoever they are, it is x rated stuff which , therefore, should not have been screened on t.v.
Posted by D
I’m referring, of course, to blathering Lathers’ and Bob potty man aka Leaf Man Brown’s committee meeting held under an ugly bush somewhere in the urbs of Hobart, planning the next feral animals’ love-in fest. Highly appropriate that footage screened by ABC caught the pair groping in a cave. It was with mixed emotions, the urge to vomit or to laugh, or weep, as one watched the clips of the two holding hands and whispering into each other’s bushpig ears sweet nothings like, how can we screw the timber industry and taxpayers and get away with it? Fat Aunty Bolshevik Collective played wedding photographer, master of ceremonies and propaganda unit ( yes, odd that a wedding should be secured by a bit of megaphone broadcasting).
First off, Latham is back to the reason why that pernicious, malevolent polpotian movement, greenies, were catapulted into poltical weighting in the first place: craven, venal politicians building up voting blocks, with Hawke and Keating the first to deliberately cultivate the greens as a voting block and at considerable loss and costs to many : including the shareholders whose capital in a certain company, having satisfied all `environmental regulations’ with final approvals signed by the federal govt. , was thrown down the drain, along with common law of course, becuase Hawke and Keating decided , they could freely do so and did, exchange Coronation Hill to buy the votes and thus help build it up of a pack of savages. And Latham is at it again ( what was that you were banging on about Rudd, how principled the ALP is, are you deaf, dumb, blind, or just a craven snivelling chipmunk), doing the same again, building the votes of a pernicious movement.
Going over the material on ABC’s site, one couldn’t locate one of many an insidious consideration outlined by Latham, screened during last week.Latham contemplated forestry in areas could be phased out, with the govt. paying firms compensation to exit in certain areas, while concentrating on `value adding ‘.
Since values of materials used to produce any product are established by the value of product, one can conclude one of only two things. Firstly,either Latham is lying because he fully appreciates that fact, in order to bribe greenies, or,he is an ignoramus altogether. Secondly, he could be contmeplating national socialism and Latham’s statments on a number of different matters, indicate that, underneath it all, that is what he is.
Latham’s comments to the effect: Tasmanian forests are are of such national importance they cannot be left ot companies and the Tasmanian govt. As for special pleading, Latham produced this outright swill: they are a national asset, all Australians enjoy them, and either he or one of the party advisers added, they are important for the well-being of the community.
‘
No Latham. What does show out from your whoring with the polpotian greenies, is an intention to compound the overthrow of common law by federal, states and local govt, and the economic depradations which have accompanied it, in using environmentalism as an excuse, and that is all it is, to increase the encroachment of stasiland and pour on more tax increases.
The curious insight is, not the votes of tasmanians, but , the votes of wombat, snivelling psuedo-middle-class leftoids in Sydney, and then places like Melbourne. That insight was telling disclosed in a singular observation by one of Latrhers’ backers on the ABC propaganda services: if, though it would be a compromise, something can be worked out which would secure the concerns truthfully put by the greenies but without `hurting’ foresters and firms, this would serve to help secure the votes of `environmentalists’ in Sydney.
What Latham and his cabinet is on about is damnable. When taken with other matters such as Iraq, Latham, far from being a `working-class hero’, and his colleagues,principled men and women, are outright spivs, userers, who, on the strength of what they have publicly put so far, would, if elected, firmly take Australians frimly down one road only, totalitarians. I put it to readers, Latahm is a national socialist, backed by a cabinet of charlatans, spivs, craven ductile venal capricious types not fit for govt. what so ever. Blathering Lathy is nothing but a gangster. Well, he is in good company: after all, there is that pack of commie spivs in Spring St. called the Bracks Govt.
Post a Comment