Mangled Thoughts

Posted by D
The map below shows a very big bulge of a battle, Ardennes 1944

Good.

From lessons one and two what can be learnt:

Sticking a finger on any spot of the globe, even if it is Afghanistan, doesn’t quite describe the war against terrorists. Not even the situation in Afghanistan corresponds with either type of map, that is, either as theatre or as battle-field.

Some-one else, Gary, Ilibcc, for e.g., can feel free to add in further lessons.
For, if perchance Lathy should win come election time, I’d say , these sort of things need to be sorted out now or else Oz could be up to the eyeballs in shit.
(Continued)

Posted by D
Next to foreign Policy and other matters, baby Lathy and nutless Rudd have difficulties in comprehending warfare. This is evident given each as stated, the war against terror is there , in Afghanistan. To help them out, here is the first lesson:

The following map is the fornt the 6-Day War 1964: the front, as it si clealry shown is identical with a great stretch of Israeli borders with arrows indicating battle routes and lines.

That was easy.
(Continued)

Posted by D
I’m referring, of course, to blathering Lathers’ and Bob potty man aka Leaf Man Brown’s committee meeting held under an ugly bush somewhere in the urbs of Hobart, planning the next feral animals’ love-in fest. Highly appropriate that footage screened by ABC caught the pair groping in a cave. It was with mixed emotions, the urge to vomit or to laugh, or weep, as one watched the clips of the two holding hands and whispering into each other’s bushpig ears sweet nothings like, how can we screw the timber industry and taxpayers and get away with it? Fat Aunty Bolshevik Collective played wedding photographer, master of ceremonies and propaganda unit ( yes, odd that a wedding should be secured by a bit of megaphone broadcasting).

First off, Latham is back to the reason why that pernicious, malevolent polpotian movement, greenies, were catapulted into poltical weighting in the first place: craven, venal politicians building up voting blocks, with Hawke and Keating the first to deliberately cultivate the greens as a voting block and at considerable loss and costs to many : including the shareholders whose capital in a certain company, having satisfied all `environmental regulations’ with final approvals signed by the federal govt. , was thrown down the drain, along with common law of course, becuase Hawke and Keating decided , they could freely do so and did, exchange Coronation Hill to buy the votes and thus help build it up of a pack of savages. And Latham is at it again ( what was that you were banging on about Rudd, how principled the ALP is, are you deaf, dumb, blind, or just a craven snivelling chipmunk), doing the same again, building the votes of a pernicious movement.

Going over the material on ABC’s site, one couldn’t locate one of many an insidious consideration outlined by Latham, screened during last week.Latham contemplated forestry in areas could be phased out, with the govt. paying firms compensation to exit in certain areas, while concentrating on `value adding ‘.

Since values of materials used to produce any product are established by the value of product, one can conclude one of only two things. Firstly,either Latham is lying because he fully appreciates that fact, in order to bribe greenies, or,he is an ignoramus altogether. Secondly, he could be contmeplating national socialism and Latham’s statments on a number of different matters, indicate that, underneath it all, that is what he is.

Latham’s comments to the effect: Tasmanian forests are are of such national importance they cannot be left ot companies and the Tasmanian govt. As for special pleading, Latham produced this outright swill: they are a national asset, all Australians enjoy them, and either he or one of the party advisers added, they are important for the well-being of the community.
‘
No Latham. What does show out from your whoring with the polpotian greenies, is an intention to compound the overthrow of common law by federal, states and local govt, and the economic depradations which have accompanied it, in using environmentalism as an excuse, and that is all it is, to increase the encroachment of stasiland and pour on more tax increases.

The curious insight is, not the votes of tasmanians, but , the votes of wombat, snivelling psuedo-middle-class leftoids in Sydney, and then places like Melbourne. That insight was telling disclosed in a singular observation by one of Latrhers’ backers on the ABC propaganda services: if, though it would be a compromise, something can be worked out which would secure the concerns truthfully put by the greenies but without `hurting’ foresters and firms, this would serve to help secure the votes of `environmentalists’ in Sydney.

What Latham and his cabinet is on about is damnable. When taken with other matters such as Iraq, Latham, far from being a `working-class hero’, and his colleagues,principled men and women, are outright spivs, userers, who, on the strength of what they have publicly put so far, would, if elected, firmly take Australians frimly down one road only, totalitarians. I put it to readers, Latahm is a national socialist, backed by a cabinet of charlatans, spivs, craven ductile venal capricious types not fit for govt. what so ever. Blathering Lathy is nothing but a gangster. Well, he is in good company: after all, there is that pack of commie spivs in Spring St. called the Bracks Govt.
(Continued)

Posted by D
Seems one called that shot to within less than a whisker’s micron of accuracy, Kevin Rudd’s, the human Chipmunk, meritricous and vacuous statments on foreign policy. Latham, meanwhile, reminded one of nothing less than a child with a toy in his mutterances on withdrawing the troops, all 84 of them, should he win, sometime around September : it’s my toy, I can do with it as I please, we decide.

The week before, Leaf Man, Bob Brown, whined, the govt. has to bring the troops home in order to strengthen defence capacity within Oz. Right Bob, Brown by name, brown in something else. I can see what he means, they are needed to man the old colonial forts with rusting cannon trained on tall ships.Perhaps someone could repair them and train them on the greenies - perhaps the 84 should be brought home, to knock of the varmints.

Sunk in a chair with a touch of flue, not twitching, watched Question Time. The Chipmunk squared up at the despatch box, all 3′1″ of him and delivered what he believed presumably to be a killer question. I was as mystified as Lex, there was no point in it at all. The ALP frontbench must have some weird tactics plotting sessions these days.

Given question time is used by oppositions to set up points for the major debate they have planned for the day. The ALP is lost with Brown, clinging to tree stumps like those pissing, rooting, smelly but edible things called koala bears. After all, their great trip-wire line during question time was a simple simon assertion , the govt’s commitments in Iraq are now running beyond some finish date.

Lex, unlike those opposite has some advantages: he is in top of his brief as minister of foreign affairs. Lex has also conducted foreign policy on a reliable basis, the govt. does not launch surprises which emits rather confusing signals to other govts. and other parties to whom also a safe pair of hands is much to be preferred. Latham, Rudd et al, their hands are not merely not safe, they are time-bombs stitched to stumped wrists .

There are those who consider Foreign policy requires brilliance and daring.It seems to escape them, that is code for fool, stupidity and disaster on the horizon. The Whitlam’s govt. policies on East Timor and Papuae New Guinea were disasters.The, `we are Asians’ policy of the Hawke-Keating Govt. might have been believed by the chardonay-sipping pseudo-intellectual left who find the ABC a source of emoluments for spending money, like Phuc Adams but Asian govts. didn’t believe it. The only thing to be said of infants running such serious matters as F.P. is, if you are someone seeking to screw something out of, say OZ, I’d say your X-mas present has already arrived or, rather, might arrive sooner than the day of feasting.

What nut-nibbler boy wonder and blathering Lathers propose is, however, worse, unconscionably so, to abandon the Iraqis and opening up, therefore, the prospect, a pack of armed savages will take up where the Coalition of the 3 Anglos ensured Saddam had left off. Despicable, the policy of thugs. And so soon after the nut-nibbler had wheezed on about how `principled’ ALP foreign policy is, even though by then, as it remains, what is an ALP foreign policy - any who find one, flush it down the toilet where it belongs, is a mystery only known to toilet flush material Brown ( this guy has never been potty trained and so, shits his dacks continuously).
(Continued)

Posted by D
the epileptic lunatic in a straightjacket is comatose and behaving.Had its brain extracted and reinserted through its nostrils and drugged it, heavily. Mary’s little lamb is a wild beast by comparison.
(Continued)