Mangled Thoughts

Now, it is good to see some economic advance in China. China has one almighty burden to bear, the communist regime. Brookes.news, again, has set out frequently enough Peking’s foreign policy.

Wish to quote Zhang at some length:

China, Japan and NMD: Good news for Bush
Peter Zhang BrookesNews.Com

Beijing said that “Some Americans do not want to give up the Cold War mentality and retain a fierce hostility to the rise of China.” This was truly rich coming from a mob that sanctioned an article in a Chinese military paper that threatened a loss of 200 million Americans as the price of defending 20 million Taiwanese (sic).

It should be clear as the nose on one’s face that any country that does not take defensive measures against this kind of threat needs its collective head examined.
Her last hope is a Kerry victory.

Two features stand out: Peking is engaged in destablising Latin America, another cold war it could be said against the U.S. Zhang, has pointed out before, however, Peking’s military- poltical aims include what could be called another `greater co-prosperity sphere’, and regards Australia should be under it’s direction. This, no doubt is sweet music to the French whose notion of trade blocks is well publicised.

Bearing the above in mind, Sheehan is kema sabe with this bit Peking boot licking in the SMH:
China better seen as an ally, not as a threat.

Sheehan concludes a `strategic alliance’ with Peking is desireable and will bear returns by way of trade.

Garbage Sheehan, those in the business of commerce are bets situated to to conduct trade with chinese citizenbs, not, mind, the Peking Geriatric club. Like Kerry, the Peking Geriatric club would, no doubt look forward to an ALP win, so to do to Oz what they did to the U.S. through CLinton and Gore.

And notice, what Sheehan’s garbage amounts to is supproting a regime which harbours malevolent design s to Taiwan and the threat their strategic aims cold be realised because of a federal cabinet led by incompetent, humbugging fools like Latham and Rudd and Crean.

Shall add one thing more: ABC radio a couple of weeks ago carried an item of an arrest by the Chinese govt. of a now U.S. citizen, ex-China and who had been one of the demonstrators at the Tianaman Square massacre. He was visiting China, the govt. had him arrested for spying or sedition, I forget which charge.

The journo introduced the report with the following garbage: the communist regime is an aurthoriatarian regime hiding behind socialism: No Fat Aunty Bolshevik Collective, socialism is totalitarianism perforce. Socialism of whatever hue leads to `authoritarianism’ to use your slightly ambiguous expression.