Phuc Phil is merely clever, it shows in his use of language and the defectiveness of his judgement. The man is rotten to the core thoroughly bankrupt:
July 24, 2004
BREAD was fine, but when it came to winning Roman hearts and minds, nothing beat the circus. For six centuries, in arenas throughout the empire, patrician Romans sponsored spectacles of escalating cruelty. Whether presented by a Nero, a Caligula, a regional governor or a political aspirant, they were truly the greatest shows on Earth.
And the Roman circus is back in style. The “shock and awe” attack on Baghdad qualifies, as did John Howard giving the thumbs-down to asylum seekers.
The U.N. is worse for, unlike Phuc Phil they are complicit in many an evil deed. Anan is a complete fraud whose sanctimonious public handwringing doesn’t fit his won record. Rudd, Latham, Beazely, would have OZ respect and obey a pack of crims whose greatest achievements are proppping up mass-murdering scum, and many other real crimes like fraud. In return, good old real taxpayer is epxected to keep them. It puts into perspective the false moral finger wagging of the left, including Phuc Phil, Beazely, Rudd and Latham.
As Steyn writes:
Mark Steyn: Blame the UN cheerleaders
broken beyond repair. The Security Council was unable to agree even on a resolution merely expressing some criticism of the Sudanese Government - China, Pakistan and Algeria scuppered that. In May, even as its proxies were getting stuck into their ethnic cleansing in Darfur, Sudan was elected to a three-year term on the UN Human Rights Commission. This isn’t an aberration: Zimbabwe is also a member. The very structure of the UN, under which countries vote in regional blocs, encourages such affronts to decency. The Sudanese representative immediately professed himself concerned by human rights abuses at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib.
One day historians will wonder why the most militarily advanced nations could do nothing to halt men with machetes and a few rusting rifles. Just over a century ago, after Kitchener’s victory over the dervishes at Omdurman, Belloc wrote:
“Whatever happens
We have got
The Maxim gun
And they have not.”
we’re powerless against them because we have fetishised the poseur-multilateralism of the UN as the only legitimate form of intervention.
No, all that the U.N. and Toffee Man Anan can muster is to attempt to force Israel to cease defending citizens, something lost foreign to Margo Kingston whose descent into madness has shifted into a higher gear with conspiracy theories, as Bolt relates:
Kingston this week was asked by a reader to explain why there was little debate over the United Nation’s (disgraceful) vote to demand Israel pull down a wall built to keep out suicide bombers.
Simple, wrote Kingston: “(It’s) because the fundamentalist Zionist lobby controls politics and the media in the US and Australia.” She even had proof “the Libs (were) in the Zionists (sic) pockets”.
Leftoid journos have complained of `censorship’ and `rightwing’ conspiracies to undemrine democracy. The leftoid journos who write for Murdoch don’t waste time when attacking Republicans and defending Democrats as the epitome of reason, responsibility, and lovers of liberty. With Arnie mooted as a Presidential candidate, if the obstacle can be changed, Murdoch journo, Lusetich vents his spleen against Arnie:
Arnie shapes for the Oval OfficeThe most bipartisan figure in US politics is starting to look unbeatable for the presidency — apart from his nationality, writes Robert Lusetich
July 24, 2004
Schwarzenegger, says Shriver, “is in the optimism business”.
No kidding. How else does a scrawny, sickly child from a remote Austrian village become a world-champion bodybuilder, marry a Kennedy, become the highest-paid movie star in the world and then governor of California, the world’s fifth-largest economy?
The ink of envy has, obviously enough, been spilled by the gallons. Lusetich is economical with the truth: Arnie’s, he writes, `victories’ as governor,
are dubious and in some ways — borrow now, pay later deficit economics — not much different to what Davis offered.
What he omits, of course, is the deficit is all due to Arnie’s Democratic predecessor and his spending spree and general fiscal malfeasance. Arnie is doing three things: cutting the source of the crisis, govt. consumption, cutting taxation, and refinancing the debt to ensure repayment schedules and tax revenue cancel out. There is much in this pointing up the malfeasance of the Bracks and carr govts. and worse to follow should Latham win office. The following by Mr. Jackson is pertinent:
President Bush: deficits and interest rates
Gerard Jackson
BrookesNews.Com
Monday 26 July 2004
Increased government spending creates deficits that in turn bring about a demand for government to behave responsibly by raising taxes to eliminate the deficit it created. The inevitable result is that total government spending, meaning Federal, state and local, rises until it reaches the point where taxes and not deficits become irresponsible. In other words, the problem is not deficits but government spending.
Thus the Democrats’ deficit argument for raising taxes becomes a recipe for crushing taxation and economic stagnation. Unfortunately, most Senate and Congressional Democrats, with a sprinkling of Republicans, do not understand this fact. What is even worse, they do not care to understand it. We can now see that though there is no mechanical relationship between deficits and interest rates deficits definitely do influence them. So is President Bush right? From a free market angle he is. Not because free marketeers favour deficits, they do not, but because Bush, knowingly or otherwise, has drawn the public’s attention to the fact that it is they and not politicians who pay for government spending.
And by they I mean even those who think they do not pay any taxes at all. Ultimately, nearly everyone pays.
As for bipartisanship, perhaps what Lusetich objects to is Bush and Arnie are decent and principled gentlemen and Arnies’ next greatest sin being his openly avowed patriotism for a country in which he too has been free to make a success of his life. The leftoid journos have a further problem documented very well and extensively by Brookes.news, the real `bipartisans’ are the democrats,, whose record is unambiguous, latest examples:
Berger’s contempt for US national security
Scott Jordan
BrookesNews.Com
Monday 26 July 2004
“[Lindsey’s] nicknames have run the gamut from “the Enforcer” to “the Consigliere,” the Sicilian word for a trusted counsel to a Mafia chieftain.” ? Time Magazine, March 23 19981
The astonishing admission of Samuel “Sandy” Berger, Bill Clinton’s longtime National Security Advisor, that he stuffed “code-word”-class secret documents into his pants, sneaked them out of a secure review room at the National Archives and “inadvertently” destroyed them is highly disquieting to those familiar with Berger’s background and activities in the Clinton Administration.
In particular, the Washington Post reports1 that Berger purloined all draft revisions of a key critique of the government’s response to the millennium terrorism threat, a document that detailed Administration knowledge - and inaction - regarding al Qaeda presence in the U.S. in 1999 and 2000. Stolen were crucial notes in the margins of these drafts which reveal the thinking and agendas of the Clinton Administration relating to the mounting terrorist threat.
It was Berger whose calls Bill Clinton ducked in 1998 when bin Laden was briefly vulnerable to missile attack.9
It was Berger who was singled-out by former UN Inspector Scott Ritter for the collapse of UN inspections efforts in Iraq.10
It was Berger who helped broker the farcical antinuclear treaty with North Korea. It was Berger who ultimately admitted that the Clinton Administration had failed to develop a war plan to fight al Qaeda.11
Then, this:
The Dems rich supporters and the stench of fascism
Gerard Jackson
BrookesNews.Com
Monday 26 July 2004
This, too:
The Democrats want to exterminate the Republican Party
Gerard Jackson
BrookesNews.Com
Monday 26 July 2004
The hypocrisy of leftoids on matters of wealth and tax is evident, well displayed in Oz too for that matter. Democrats like to scream they a re poor little guys. The Kennedy’s weren’t, nor FDR, nor Carter, nor Clinton, nor many a aprty backer, Moosehead More, Theresa Heinz who waxing lyrically about the Dems proposed spend and tax policies pays nothing much at all, like Moosehead too, and many a `glamour’ Democrat.
What Lusetich intends, however, is partisanship, that the Democrats definitely are, in quite the Stalinist fashion. One happens to believe the visciouness of the Democrats is, in some part, bound up with the fact it was the party of slave onwers and pro-slavery states and their acutal record viz blacks a long and nasty one. The runs on the board are scored by Republicans:
Republicans’ record on blacks beats the Democrats hands down
Addison Ross
BrookesNews.Com
Monday 26 July 2004
Turning to OZ, the greenies are nothing but a criminal outfit, pol potian commies. Greenies in Victoria have to decided to follow the lead of those in Europe. They should be minded of, yet again, they are now guilty of conspiring to commit major criminal offences. The worst offence being the spiking of trees to `stop logging’ which has no other force than the intent to cause major physical injury, even murder of loggers. Why criminal charges have never been laid against them is a mystery, but here is further casue to do it:
Greens to mow down GM crops
Bob Brown, Carmen Lawrence, Bartlett and rather a large number of other leftoid pollies are demonstrating how low they are, and how callow, nasty, vulgar they really are as demonstrated by Bolt:
LINDSAY McDougall of Frenzal Rhomb, whose hits include World’s F—edest C–t, has asked the leading politicians of the Left for their endorsement.
He told them he and some well-known bands he knew were putting together a CD of tracks for “the fight against the oppressive, repressive Howard Government”.
“defecate on my face” and “Every single f—ing Yank deserves to f—ing die”.
These scumbags called `artistes’ have much the same to say about Howard as on Bush and `yanks’.
Michale Moore is selective in his invocation of Moore and not least because, Moore is exactly the sort of corrupter of language Orwell had in his sights:
Moore:
George Orwell – “the war is waged by the ruling group against its own subjects . . . to keep the very structure of society intact”.
It can now be no less applied to Carmen Lawrence, Brown, Bartlett et al. Scumbags, also applies to them.