Mangled Thoughts

Mohammed, Marx,
French Govt and the Kaiser on the eve of WWI, for which both are criminally culpable of
Lenin, Trotsky, Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, Che Gueverra, Fidel Castro, Mr. and Mrs. Peron, Mullahs today, Tony Blair, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, Chirac, Toffee Man Anan, Whitlam, Hwake, Keating, Howard, Bracks, Beattie, Latham, Brown, Barrett ?

My message today comes straight from the people. It’s a message to the people, drawn from the strength and wisdom of the people. …
Adolf Hitler would be an excellent choice but, no Mark Latham. All that he needed to add was:

Ein Volk, Ein Vaterland, Ein Fuhrer. Yet that sums up where all the parties are taking Oz. What really stinks to high heaven is the fact, having gone through how many wars in the 20th century , that’s without coutning in, say, the Napoleanic Wars, and so forth, to fight totalitarina bastards. Now what do we have in Oz, all the parlaiments who hold seats in each tier of govt. taking Oz down the road to totalitarianism enslavement to the the jumped up usurious dictators, and that includes fucking public servants.

It really was a waste of time fighting Germany twice, Italy, Japan, USSR because the totalitarina bipartisan bastards are in the business of imposing totalitarianism any way, what a disgrace. Good men sent to bloody wars to make Oz safe for commie fucking dicators all parties. My Grand father didn’t like it when he returned from WWII, he must be rolling in his grave in view of the commie thugs all parties each tier of great fat God Almighty Allah-Marx-Papist-Maoist-Keynesian-whatever jumped up nobody of a first rate gangster.

But Latham, he’s definitely out to bask in some of Adolf’s limelight, why else would anyone but a national socialist thug like Blathering Lathers plaigarise almost verbatim a line form one of his Uncle Adolf’s speeches?

Having discovered STC’s original poem behind Kublai Khan, one has furthered the studious stuff. I’m on a winner, expect Chair at Cambridge soon, minimum, with speaking tours and cruises on QEII paid by giving lectures on my startling findings. I’m at the beginning of a long journey aboard a gravy train.

Ilibcc has posted immediately the latest on what this election campaign amounts to, a degeneration into promises by all the parties to sack everyone until they all are bankrupted and squatting in the streets.

In view of the Billy Shakespeare moment, Bartlett on taxes,and in view of the above, it is propitious to relate my next discovery.

King Henry IV:

Having uncovered from within a top secret librarium top secret memos by Billy and sundry letters, receipts for booze and good food, a new pair of pantaloons, a riding crop, a new horse and such necessary requisites, a short note confirmed my suspicion: King Henry IV contains a rather obvious commentary on this year’s elections and the thugs called politicians.A sample text shall serve, sufficiently explicit to confirm all.

Ac.I,Sc.II, 1-20

Falstaff is a composite figure: Crean, Rudd, Beazely, Bob Brown, Nettles, Bartlett.

Prince Henry is Latham, clearly the familial, Hal, plays upon the sexual perversions the aforenamed enjoy with their `Prince’.

:1-12
Fal. Now, Hal, what time of day is it, lad?
P Thou art so fat-witted with drinking of old sack,
and unbuttoning thee after supper, and sleeping
upon benches after noon ….

A night of perverse sexual indulgence. Filth, horrible, disgusting but, all too true.

:13-15

Fal Indeed, you come near me now Hal, for we that take purses go by the moon and the seven stars, and not “by Phoebus, he that wand’ring Knight so fair”

Shakespeare is characterising the aforesaid politicians as, the worst of criminals. As befits crims, they engage in highway robbery and murder not in public gaze, but when concealed.

Pheobus is code for John Howard, the Coalition is damned socialisto and usurious enough and that is what Shakespeare has to say. The above assorted scumbags, however, are so wicked, to feel good they have to compare themselves against another gang of criminals. It is an ironic touch by Shakespeare, they are all obnoxious but Pheobus is slightly better than the other scumbags.

16-19

Fal and I prithee sweet wag, when thou art king, as
God save thy grace -Majesty I should say, for
grace thou wilt have none-
P What, none?

Billy makes the point, thieving fat god almighty tyrannical govt has to appeal to god or some higher morality to excuse their vices and pretend they are nothing but hardened gangsters engaged in extortion blackmail and property theft on a massive scale.

Even so, Shakespeare observes, `Majesty……What, none’, they do realise that is all that they are, no better than thugs and savages thrown into prison. What is the distinction, Shakespeare implies rhetorically , ie. none at all. Even the scumbags themselves realise that is all that, at bottom they are.

The above only confirms, Shakespeare is an accurate and shrewd observer of character, even those pretending to be moral, politicians but are nothing but usurious, extorting, blackmailing, common as muck gangsters.Shakespeare wrote of the gradual rise of totalitarians in OZ, the thrust of the play, with the election as the turning point of the descent in to totalitarianism, in the 16th century !

The Russkies are barracking from the sideline, crying , loudly:

Go Dubya, and, Bush for President.

The Moscow Times is a good read: far better journalism than the crapola purveyed by Oz medja. In a reasonably well argued column, the writer observes:

Whither Relations After November?Many politicians and experts in Russia prefer the current president as a more convenient choice. Arguments in his favor tend to follow a single line: a good personal relationship with the Russian president and the traditionally decent results in bilateral relations under a Republican government, versus the prospect of a strengthened desire to “teach democracy” in the case of a Democratic victory.

Some Russian’s reactions to Whale Bum Moore’s bilge, mixed

I fell asleep halfway through,” a user named Slava wrote on Kino.ru. “It is ordinary black PR for zombified people who can’t think on their own.”

Slava focused in particular on Moore’s manipulation of footage showing the president receiving news of the World Trade Center attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, while reading a book to a classroom of children. Instead of reacting immediately, Bush continued reading, and Moore zooms in on the president for added effect.

“What was he supposed to do, run around the room shouting, ‘We are lost!’ and scare all the children?” Slava wrote. “The film is useful to watch so you don’t fall into the same kind of PR trap in your own country.”

Other web posters proved as anti-Bush as Moore, pointing out parallels between U.S. and Russian policy and noting the unlikelihood of such a film being made here.

For others, the film tapped a different vein — not anti-Bushism, but anti-Americanism.

“This confirms that the government there is full of bastards,” said Sergei, 25, a doctor attending the second showing of “Fahrenheit” at the Baikal-Atlantis cinema in northern Moscow. “America is more of a terrorist than any other country.”

On fighting terrorists:

Keystone Kops Take on Terrorism
By Yulia Latynina

An epidemic swept across Russia a couple of years ago. Not a week passed without the police discovering a cache belonging to Chechen terrorists in a rented apartment somewhere — half a kilo of TNT here, automatic rifles there.

And when the police discovered these caches, they did just the opposite of what they had been trained to do, i.e. stake the place out and wait for the terrorists to arrive. The police never staked out these apartments. They rushed to announce yet another success in the war against terror. There’s only one explanation: They knew no one would be coming to collect the bombs.

On Putin:

Propping Up Putin’s Myth

By Pavel Felgenhauer The Beslan hostage crisis exposed the weakness and inefficiency of President Vladimir Putin’s authoritarian and ostensibly tightly controlled regime. Putin’s dictatorial rule and repression of the media, along with the corruption of law enforcement and the judiciary, elicited only disjointed, ineffective protests in the West. The West does not speak with one voice: The German government, composed of Social Democrats and Greens, continues to support Putin’s policies publicly. The financial community, from the president of the World Bank to business leaders and investment analysts, has expressed similar indifference.

The people who made billions in deals with Saddam Hussein, who do business in Nigeria and Venezuela and who support cooperation with China despite its dismal human rights record are not going to get worked up when Putin cracks down on a few pesky journalists. If the massacre of tens of thousands of civilians in Chechnya isn’t enough to make Russia …

Putin’s Days Are Numbered

By Yevgenia Albats In the midst of all the bad news coming out of Russia, last week offered some hope. A survey conducted by the pro-Kremlin Public Opinion Foundation revealed that despite a massive advertising campaign on state television, ordinary Russians do not support President Vladimir Putin’s proposed reforms, including the appointment of regional leaders.

Sixty-one percent of respondents from across the country voiced their opposition to the proposal, which would for all intents and purposes allow the Kremlin to handpick regional leaders. The poll showed that an overwhelming majority of Russians also oppose Putin’s proposal to scrap the election of State Duma deputies from single-mandate districts. Instead, the lower house is to be composed exclusively of candidates elected from party lists, effectively excluding the election of independent candidates. Only 9 percent of respondents supported this change. Meanwhile, 50 percent said they trust deputies elected from single-mandate districts.

Well, at least in Oz we have two newspapers worth reading:

The London Telegraph and the Moscow Times.

The Greens in the campaign unctiously assert how pure they all are, spurning big business, omitting, conveniently, to mention,Greens fronts are tied to very large scale profit making businesses controlled by greenies and their symapthisers. But their capacity for telling such whopping lies, has just been bettered by another big business, which also benefits by govts., each tier, forking over real taxpayers’ money into their tills, the `Australian Conservation Council.’

Gnu Hunter tells all on:

The Greens Peter Garrett presided at the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) while a battle raged over a dying widow’s money.

Charities and groups such as the ACF hounded the woman in her last days each urging her to bequeath them her money.

A WEALTHY widow’s $600,000 dying wish has been shattered by a leading green group headed at the time by Labor candidate Peter Garrett.

The Australian Conservation Foundation went to court to get its share of the money after the woman cut the high profile

Well, that just demonstrates what a commie scumbag Peter Garrett is, as well as his fellow Pol Potian commie mullah thugs.

And Gnu Hunter is spot on with:

Australia is faced with the prospect of every government in the country being ruled by Labor.

If Latham and the ALP win power and form the Federal Government then no one and nothing can stop them from implementing their craziest, left-wing, politically correct, economically and socially dangerous legislation

Any reader cares to disagree, one merely points to hard evidence, holding control over the Upper House in Victoria, that is what another pack of lying, thieving, malfeasent commie scmbags called the Bracks led ALP govt. of Victoria does, it is ramming it’s Stalinist progroms through both Houses with not at all concealed haste.

Scumbags, the whole fucking lot of them, professional dole bludging hectoring, lying, stealing, racketteering crims, thugs, lumps of shit squittering on real tax payers. And these bastards collect `parlaimentary paypackets’, in Garrett’s case, aspires to: tell you what, Garrett, you piece of dog shit, after the above effort, if you are elected, you should be imprisoned for fraud should you take what good old real taxpyer is forced to handover, on the threat of violence against them, their own property in the form of taxes, so you fuckers can idle away cooking up you commie scams ands `laws’, ditto to that national socialisto scumbag bench led by Blathers Latham and the other by Bartlett. Spivs, the whole fucking lot of them…

As for the contested will, if any have rights and seek to assert them, it is Lady’s family. Why sit there to watch a total of over a million dollars of assets handed over to commie scumbags. First rule, each looks after their own first, something socialistos of all parties, along with forgetting about meum and tuum distinction when it suits them, conveniently ignore. In this case, do the beneficiaries have any rights at all, if one were a judge one would rule , Not so, and order all the property be returned to the family.

An item posted by Mike Jericho sets out what Bliar’s New Way has amounted to on a grander scale, see below.

CIA Vs CIC