Mangled Thoughts

The ALP claim its Cain-Kirner led administrations were frustrtaed by the opposition in the Upper House.That isa false: the opposition did not use its Upper H. numbers ot refuse supply. Those cabinets freely did everything it dreamt up, finishing off withe depression Victorians did not have to have. What the opposition did do was block bills which were just of the nasty totaliatrain type the Bracks Govt. is now busily ramming through the Houses each sitting day. They have been doing this, in its second term, at the rate of two to three per day. This Stalinist regime, unless it is sacked, even charged with criminal offences, has another two years to run. Ponder that, 2 years to run of ramming through Stalinist measures each day Parlaiment sits.

On its `smoking ban laws’, property rights have been ovethrown on that count alone. In the Bracks lead ALP first term, the police stae bills measures passed have been piecemeal, let by the oppositon. Now in their second term, they are in naked broad sweeping acts acutally sweeping away property rights: that means freedom is being elimnated ourtight. For, property and freedom of commerce and contracts are the core grounds of common law. Freedom of speech exists in common law, not because of some bloody govt. bestowing `human rights’ which is due to the totalitarian notions of such as Hobbes and Comte. It is thus, as advanced by common law, in unfeetered property rights and freedom of exchnage, in trade, of contracts, and the roperty of oneself which is the basis of `free speech’ and the English intuitive notion of tolerance. `Power to tax’, in the Oz constitutions , is in fact a gross violation of the solid principles which renders the common law such an effective stopper against also totalitarian inclined `govt’. It is in effect nothing more than the assertion: the govt. owns you lie a serf.Your property is not your property, it really belongs to the govt: thta’s is not ridiculous at all, beacuase that is eaxctly the assumtion on what the several state, federal, local council tax acts run on. It is exactly the false and criminally false assumptipon on which the tax offices work. It is no secret that it is held, any property not taken via tax is in fact a grant of the govt. through their tax office to the poor sod taxed on pain, for refusal, of being thrown into prison and permanently branded as a criminal. Bracks has drawn out the force of that with clarity which at once is brutal and yet discloses it fully.

As long as govts., or, in reality, politicians and their willing ductile, cravean, venal, police state hired thugs, could convince as many as possible that such measures are necassary, are lawful, exploited the natural resentments of the envious, the caprious and the truly selfish, they have faced no determined opposition. It is downright rubbish however, that taxes `regulation’ affect only those who can be depicted as some how immoral. Entrepeneurs are `greedy, sefish’, so, hey, tax them ,it’s the moral thing to do. Not so, most are hit in some way, sooner or later: fewer paid jobs, reducing incomes, higher prices, shortages of goods and services. Regulations are not neutral, many federal, state and local basically declare any who fall under them are criminals until they prove themselves innocent. Now, this is what Bracks Acts has demonstrated with such brutal and naked clarity. The politicians can no longer pretend their stasiland laws and taxes merely hit `the big end of town’, `big companies’, dah `wealthy’. As all such past measuresd just do, they far more than politicias deceitfully lie about. But Bracks Govt. has made that explicit against a fast increasing numbers of Victorians, in reality, there is nothing much left to any Victorian, the vast majority, are subject to any of the many hideous acts and sections this stalinist govt. calls `law’.

How does it pan out with the `Vilification law’. Effectively, what the Govt. has done is, under an unlawful in common law Act, established a pretext which it can, through its agents, including `citizen’s co-opted - volitionally of course, enter private property in an attempt to find evidence by which they can have convicted other -wise law abiding men and women on a charge worthy of the Comminst regimes and the Nzi regime, then seize some of their assets and throw them into prison. Under common law, no one has to answer to any govt. nor any other individual, , let alone defend themselves in such a mannert at all, let alone over the spurious tripe that constiuted the charges against them.

Nothing makes it clearer than the crimes act under which, anyone just alleged to have committed an `organised crime’ can be arrested at any time of day, whisked off to a secret location, family and friends totally ignorant of even just that, interrogated on a basis straight from the medieval inquisition, no access to the `evidence’ so gained, no lawyer present unless the `Chief E.’ approves, and other things besides. In other words, just as the police officer being tried on an entielry false charge cooked up by a malicious bitch, thus you can be whisked of and treated in a way the Nazi and Communist regimes are much noted for. Try also the former Baath ( socialist ) regime of Iraq.Or,Mugabe’s Zimbwabe. Under other Acts, the Bracks Govt, has asserted, it can seize you property at whim, it can stop you conducting your business, doing your work at whim, and force you to take, the consequent loss of income. It asserts, it can not only do so, it can also destroy property you own at whim. It asserts it can enter your property at whim because of a suspicioun. It can arrest you and have you convicted on rubbiush paraded a slaw at whim.

This is not histrionic paranoia, that its the force of the Acts. Damn it, that is what DHS did to that family and other families -` We can take a child and claim, it is our child - and abuse the child too for good measure, and expose teenagers to crims, ensure girls are impregnated and hook them on drugs. It uses police brute force to do so.

Just as under the Nazi and communist regimes, what do we find, increasing numbers who willingly serve as `officers’ of the great new secret police state departments and sub-agencies. Men and women who shuffle bumpf over long hours, well short hours really, in applying the Stalinist measures of the Bracks govt. Others are co-opted to inform on kith and neighbour, to merely allege something not at all immoral and have their kith and neighbour convicted. And with it, watch the Stalinists fine them, throw the victims into prison and steal their property.

The reality is , the Bracks Govt is lawless, it is totalitarian, the individual is assumed to be a criminal and will be found to be so by hook or by crook. No one’s freedom and property is safe, your property is now virtually the possession of the govt. that does mean you too. That is what it amounts to. The OHS 2004 act makes that plain: they can enter your property at whim and, as long as thugs can find a pretext under the act seize it and you. That is not a fiction, that is the reality of this pack of commie scumbags’ notion of `law’.

In common law, inciting and committing violence against others , that is - coercion against others, is tried as a criminal offence. The two prelates just convicted by a judge in a regular court, certainly were not engaged in that against muslims at all. Dah `law’ has turned into a crime no crime at all, and, moreover, has eliminated the burden of proof in criminal cases.The prelates had to prove themselves innocent, against the the most appallin gdrivel used as evdience against them.

Violation of free assembly and on private property, as given in the background of , how the two prelates were set up, informers coperpating with HEROC. So let us be clear, two informers entered private property, egged into it by the jackass court in an attempt to bag their first crims on what amounted as nothing more than an Inquistion basis, with `evidence’ procured on a remarkably similar basis.

We follow the good Professor Bunyip for a moment:

Why, the biggest story of the day: the vindication of maligned truck driver John De Jong, the fourth person subjected to a random roadside drug test

Two laboratories have now confirmed what De Jong insisted all along: On that afternoon when he was forced to surrender his keys and reputation, he was absolutely innocent

There is a reason Victoria became the first jurisdiction in the world to introduce roadside saliva tests: they just don’t work, and only leaders of the diminutive calibre now running the Garden State — pop guns, in other words, pumped up with their own importance — would have tried it on for size in the first place.

The can’t — or won’t — stop the gangland killings, which often seem to remove witnesses who might implicate Victoria’s police in various forms of corruption. They can’t — or won’t — adequately regulate bouncers a…or stop the semi-literate products of the state’s education system from spraying indecipherable scrawls in public places.

But thanks to Bracks, the police can now demand to look into the mouth of anyone they find behind the wheel of a motor vehicle, release the waylaids’ names on the strength of a test that has been rejected as grossly unreliable in other parts of the world, and then preen for the cameras about the wonderful job they are doing.

But thanks to Bracks, the police can now demand to look into the mouth of anyone they find behind the wheel of a motor vehicle, release the waylaids’ names on the strength of a test that has been rejected as grossly unreliable in other parts of the world, and then preen for the cameras about the wonderful job they are doing.

The test is charlatanism, the arrest a man on a voodoo test. He is innocent, protests it, the police none-the-less dragged the man through the mud of public odium , humilate it him, injure him and his family, with the fucking govt. clapping its hands, saying, we are tough on anyone but real, hardened gangsters. So, what is the response of the fat man who is dah minister for police, this morning: in Herald Sun, no-one should mind a bit of inconvenience. Well, even before the second term of this pack of Stalinist bastards, many were being put through `mere inconveneince’, like having their businesses shut down on the say so of a hired thug like that of Worksafe. Be clear about that readers, many of the Acts are a catch all, you can very well be on the receiving end.

For all those who declared, in opposition ot common law: there `ough to be law because this or that is immoral, dangerous, whatever’ and add: because no one who is innocent has nothing to fear. That is rubbish: in common law, even if guilty, it is up to a prosecutor to lay properly founded charges and follow due process all the way through. The new Acts of the Govt. makes plain why the notion that govt. diktat is the same as law is a grievously fasle notion, there can no more be nay delusions that notion is false and why it is false. Thoise who assert like the fat little bastard in Spring St. it’sd merely an annoyance, amybe when it is someoje else it is , to you, but what about the day you are hit by any one of thousands of sections of stasiland laws rammed through Parlaiment by the ALP this year alone. Will you come out with the baove to platitudes about govt. diktat, will you say it is merely an inconvenience. Will enjoy being whisked of too prison in secret, then interrogated, then released at the whim of the new Gestapo-KGB - let me remind readers, under the Crime Act it is itself a criminal offence punshibaly by a rpison sentence to not do as demanded and to inform, after release, you were taken to a secret place and interrogated and so abused for hours on end until you were released: that is in the Act, it is not making it up, it is in black and white.

Under the Crimes Act, someone merely says you are a crim, not only is the above done to you, but they can, on that instant seize all your property, your house, your car, your savings account, - and no doubt hand your children over to that pack of criminal savages the DHS. That is in the act, that is what the stalinist bastards rammed through the house and the gutless Governor General signed into `law’.

We have a Govt, set to end in bankruptcy, due its great big spending spree, having predicted much about that, including the real sacking as that commie mung bean mucnhing socialist drip Peter Batcxhelor just throws now billions of dollars of property stoen from good old taxpayer down that commie pig trough called `public transport’. ANd, on top, good old real taxpayer can now look forward to at least several terms in jail as a `criminal’ under any of the Acts that can be thrown at them.

So the Govts. and its not civil servants but thugs and goons can trample over anyone at whim, utterly ruin them, but it is only a `minor inconvience’,` it is merely a a process that drivers are asked to undergo’, which, obviously is all that there is too all the other processes’ anybody can undergo under anyone of the ACTs which seem lifted straight out of the good old U.S.S.R :

No one has been wrongly charged, no one has been wrongly convicted,” Mr Haermeyer said. “This is a process that drivers are asked to undergo and the worst that can happen is that if the indicative screening test gets it wrong then the driver faces a little bit of inconvenience.”

VicRoads funded the drug testing initiative, providing $1.4 million for training, wages, deployment and equipment, including testing kits and the drug bus.

And a scientist who advised the Government on the program admitted he was warned of a legal disaster if it went ahead.

But VicRoads drugs specialist Dr Philip Swann said he ignored the warnings because of the road safety benefits of saliva testing.

Despite Mr De Jong being cleared, Assistant Commissioner for traffic Bob Hastings said Victorian Police retained confidence in the program.

He saw no need to apologise to Mr De Jong, who was initially tested in a media stunt on the drug bus’s first day on the road. Mr De Jong’s case was part of the learning experience and would assist police as they evaluated the system, he said.

A mere teddy bear’s picnic the W’s. were subjected to by the DHS , as other families have. A mere thrill for businesses already bearing the brunt of many a stalinist measure for some decades now, and compounded by the current lot of lying, thieving, fat, bloated thugs. Just love the inscouciance with which these secret police state types trip such reassurances off the tongue, it’s all tickety boo, nothing to see: just like under the Nazi and Communist regimes, nothing to see, if you have a care for your own well being, pass along now or one of our nice boy scout types will smash you face in; which is what that union thug cum worksafe officer wished to do that afternoon.

No point to lookin gto common law. It is evident, many judges detest common law and are all for the totalitarian’s notion of law. As for communists pretending to be apostles of christ an dother holy joes, this:

H.Sun. Letter to ed., 18, 2004:

A rabbi, a Quaker, Revds of the denominations 3, one NAglican Arch-BastardBishop, a Unitarian chariman, a `Convener of Social Justice Network , Chruches Vic/Tas, and a president of the Islamic Council Vic.:

The conviction is a “warning to far Right and anti-Semitic groups from both the Chrsitian and Muslim communities in Vic…

who are united against the Act…

They continue, they are not opposed, of course not, that it has seen `harmony’ breaking out all over the place. They enjoy meaningful , harmony, between themselves.
The Act has:

“started to expose some of the activities of religious exremists and race-hate groups in Victoria… they scuttle about in a private misuse of the right to relgious freedom to prey on fears and anxieties… inciting hatred.. to those of other faiths or races.”

Ah, but to the collectivised drivel of socialists and sociologists and that rubbish, there is an entity called soceity and wears `fabric’:

the Act -

makes extremist groups uncomfortable and holds them to account.

Well, of course, specialm pleading is required to justify a gross violation of the rule of common law, the Act, the problem is many in Oz are, as they say, worse than Attila the Hun, Ghenghis Khan and such types. What further proof when you have such experts in bullshit as the `social justice’ brigade and sociologists, in viewe gary Bouma’s complete tripe on commonn law an dits function, whaty it serves: it is not there to impose the beliefs of anyone, that is medieval- but, hey, only an extremist bastard, apparently, could say no to Bouma’s rubbish.

What in the fuck is this supposed to mean: private misuse of the right to relgious freedom to prey on fears and anxieties ?!!! Someone could be mistaken the subject is masturbation.

What the pukers don’t appreciate, not many would give hoot about any of them except for Islamic terrorism, noticing the threats the two pastors endured, and what is being doe to real christians in Sudan, and so forth, nor dumbed down commies pretending to be apostles of christ.

under common law, no one is bound to take anyone’s beleif seriously, bow down to them nor be forced to even like them one jot and tittle. The above wish to have n ice comfy chats, who’s stopping them. But the notion any of them and their beleifs, like that other reliogion socialism, must be accepted by all and treated as some great uultimate truth and goddy is, under copmmon la outright rubbish.

But that’s way the clergy like Stalinst govts. they want peoppel to be compelled and coerced and inmproisoned an taxed, because as some of these anti-christs say now and again, only by many being thrown into destitution, despite the fact econmomic liberty is successful ,, is the only way man can learn to be dependent on God. That is not theological, that is not christological , but it is the words of men and women sunk into persecutors of Christ. Who is one of the wolves in sheep’s clothing who said that: it was a Cardinal Archbishop of New Zealand, but the sentiment is not strange to the false apostles who stuff the churches.

One won’t comment further because, due the Stalinists in Spring St., that could lead to arrest in secret and whisked away to prison. Yes, genuinely, one now does tend to entertain some trepidation for life and property of friends and dearest and one self, and what the Stalinist’s in Spring St. are now prepared to do.

They have two more years, unless they are sacked. If they are allowed to see their term out, then, we have only just seen the beginning of their `law making’ aims. Yet, even what they have now done is more than enough. It won’t take much for the upshot to be full blown totalitarianism to be finalised,in Victoria, maybe just one or two more acts, on the strength of what has been rammed through parlaiment. The Governor General must do his duty, or is he too a venal, craven ductile type, or, perhaps underneath it all, just another totalitarina socialisto. The Bracks Govt has to be sacked, they are not merely spending Victoria down the road to another economic depression, they are trurning victoria into one vast Gulag run by thugs and goons and useful idiots so impressed with their careerahs as humbugging pooh bahs, ill concealing their nastiness and malice to all who are indpendent of govt., and those reduced to dependency on the creation of socialist bastards, righ wing socialist bastards, leftwing s.bs. in between , all nothing but usurious, hectoring, dicatorial fucking commie bastards.

The drivelling, socialisto govt. boot licking fools self styled the media and journalists need to take heed: freedom of the press and of speech is not the source and guarantee of freedom, that is false and never has been the case. Common law, thus its grounds, property rights and economic liberty are the grounds of those freedoms. There never has been a free press in the absence of what are in fact the foundations of civilisation as well as freedom. That is demonstrated constantly in Western Europe today, and down through history. The medja believe they won’t be hit by such a govt, that is rubbish. The communistos pretending to be clergy might believe they are not affected, or will not be affected by it at all: that is downright garbage too. The irony is, it will hit the Church and how, sooner or later ( still that not long ).