The news from Iraq worsens every day

for the leftoids lead by terrorist hugging media:

Not 60%, but over 70% voted Sunday.And they danced in the streets with joy.

The election is an even greater victory for the Iraqi people, who have shown backbone and resolve

In contrast to the spectre of fear or apathy that was supposed to mar this occasion, international journalists have captured images of Iraqi voters literally dancing in the streets in celebration of the progress that is in the making in a land where not long ago all political authority was vested in the barrel of a gun.

Strong participation in the election would signify that the insurgents are waging an unpopular campaign, thus making it harder for them to operate within the country and indicating that their attempts to paralyze the citizenry through fear have failed.

the challenges the insurgents face become more formidable as the population steels itself in their drive for a free country.

Hegels’s mystoguogical, pantheistic notion of history taken up by Marx, and historians such as E.H Carr, is the equivalent of theosophy , man is mere disposable puppet to some great controlling force which inexorably rolls on, laying waste to many as necassary human sacrifice for some dim, obscure future. It is a primitive and savage notion, despite the formidable reasoning of Hegel, which serves nothing but an excuse for some to get away with vile crimes on a horrendous scale. A totalitarian notion of historian, Great events, usually war and increasingly totalitarian ,politicians directing the lumpenmasse to higher ends, the special pleading resorted to justify tyranny, often anchored in the occultic idealisation of nation, or, dah brudderhood.

History is no more than action of individuals, alone and conjointly. This is fundamental to that sound body of economic theory of the Austrian school .

It is little steps taken day by day, an infinite number of decisions made each day by each and every man, women, child.To speak of a future as somehow independent of that is rubbish. The future, what will prevail, what each man’s life will be, is decided by what each man and women decides and does today. There-in is also why socialism, with its false futurism, is not only gnostic heresy, but evil in force. Many are sacrificed, for the occultic fantasies of the socialist. That, ladies and gentleman is encapsulated in why Victorian schools are wicked, cesspools, corrupt, immoral, their decline is proprotionate to the fact of the socialist command and direction of the State Govt. and its department of fraud and corruption of youths, the `department of education’.

The vulgarity of `futurism’ is summed up in the snide, resentful, malicious whining of Kerry and Kennedy in response to the success of the Iraqi election:

Basically, in the wake of historic elections in Iraq, the only statements President Bush’s loyal opposition can muster belittle both the heroism of those who participated in today’s Iraqi election and those who died to provide that opportunity. The participation by the electorate was high and the violence was low — I’d call that a victory. But somehow, a historic moment just will not trump the seething hatred that Senators Kerry and Kennedy (among others) have for President Bush.

It’s a shame because in their statements on the elections, they are damning with faint praise, reluctantly saying that while today is a tiny little microscopic success, what really matters is the future.

Economic liberty, freedom of commerce, inclusive of labour contracts, is not merely sound on economic theory, it is the root and ground of civilisation, and economic freedom is the only basis which draws out the dignity of the individual, since it is the individual who is thus free to realise his potential and manifest himslef in his actions. The being of man is action - it follows from, man’s being is physical and thus, it cannot be otherwise, it is not otherwise - indeed, contrary to the clergy, that is fundamental to the N.T. literature. To that, the totalitarians in our midst are irrationally and superstitiously hostile, including they who falsely claim to be apostles of Christ, a hostility so glibly mouthed , out of their platonistic-gnostic beliefs, man is some mysterious lumpenmasse inhabiting mere material bodies. The vulgarity of this notion alone should convince of the undilutd superstition and mystoguogy socialism rests on, a religion centred in occultic worship of the destroyer god, call him Satan. It is inimical,to the Christian Gospel of the Trinity, who comes for the individual, not some lumpenmasse, not the herd, not the local commune relabelled `the community’ to which the individual is subjected , to ultimatlely some little tinpot wannabe dictatator, self -styled a community leadah, a politician, or some shria spouting sheikh and Imam .

Economic freedom is most analgous to the content of christian faith, keeping in clear view the indeed right and proper distinction, what is of man and what is of god, and what is of god not used to sacralise what is regular, contrary to the clergy in Australia who divinise socialism and in doing so, substitute a totalitarian doctrine for the content of the Gospel, that is a perversion, rooted in gnostic heresy and an act of apostasy.

The Austrian account is sound,and it pays the truth, what is generated is due to the actions of many, each one’s motives and reasons are inscrutable and their actions also (-since no one possesses some all seeing vision, unless they claim to be a god in boots), that sense can be made only through valid theory which explains impersonal general terms of action contained in the signal which is prices. The diginity of the individual emerges paramount.

McCabe, the founder of Harvester, having lost the Harvester case, during which he warned the judges that capricious central dictation of a price for labour would actually impoverish employees and those seeking paid jobs as it did happen, then had to fight what became a fact, union control over employment until recent years. He fought the unions during the course of the criminal action of the union called 3 months strike, out of the very question of liberty and the dignity of the individual, not only his own freedom rooted in property but also that he cannot be party to the tyrnanical and criminal action of forcing those employees who would notto `join’ and be subordinated to thugs, and even if they were prepared to join, as an addendum, he still could not use coercion.That was an imprtant fight and it was lost. Coercion and an outright overthrow of property rights, including of the individual in themselves, was overthrown .

Union domination went hand in hand with the legalised criminal thuggery of the IRC and the increasing central control of govt.,through taxation, fiat mnoey, central `economic planning’ and , since the 1970’s the fraud which is the `social welfare state’.

Democracy can be a road to totalitarian regime, by the hoax of making many responsible for their own enslavement, in opposition to when economic freedom and complementary rule of (common law does not) prevail, a complement because its ground is economic liberty. A hoax, contained in the rubbish, `the will of the majority’, by which politicians claim some mystical right to overthrow real freedoms.

Yet, in Iraq, each step, following the fall of Hussein and the socialist part the Ba’ath Party, has been a considerable advance. The vote Sunday, the rejoicing in the streets, showed a resolve by each of those many voters never to bow to tyrants again, nor terrorists, who like socialists, claim to `represent all’ and `know what is best for all’ when they cannot, never have, never will, and only manage to brutalise the lives of many, in the case of socialism, of fewer in the case of terrorists - though one cannot overlook how extensive that is, of the IRA-Sinn Fein in Ireland, the terrorist `State’ the `Palestinian Territory”. No, for that would be to ignore the terror of the Nazi and Commuist regimes, in the name of socialism, evil on a horrendous scale has been committed, and that it has been done so in the name of socialism is because, that is what is entailed in its occult beleifs.

The turnout was testament to, the desire for liberty resides in the integrity and dignity of the individual in all his or actions. The individual is their own end, and not being sacrificed to the occultic beliefs of Arab-Islamo-fascism in the East, and Socialism in the West.

It is, however, the case, only economic liberty and a complementary tradition of law which is the only ground on which that underlying truth can be realised, that the individual is free to act, free to build a life worth living, an adult life, a life smackful of, man’s dignity is man the individual manifest in the freedom to act and in his action. Primtive tribalism does not contradict the observation, indeed, it attests it in the negative precisley because the reality of the subordination of the idividual it is well documented, is heelish, but their is no escape for the individual, for their is no amrket economy and thus production.

The Iraqi election is one more testament to not only the evil of primitive theocracy but also of socialism, and the Ba’ath Party is a socialist Party. The election as testament, is one more bolt in the coffin of socialism, as in, it exposes it for what it is, occultic worship of the destroyer god whose son is the totalitarian dictator, the politburo, the diktat issuing, all taxing, all consuming `democratic govts’. It lays waste to lives, it calls what is good evil and what is evil is good. Evil has been thrown down in Iraq, all that is occuring in Iraq is confirmation. It is no wonder the leftoid media are searching for signs of Iraq will descend into guagmire, civil strife, slaughter,for what each Iraqi is doing flies in the face of the expectations of socialistos so well broadcasted by their propaganda machines the media.

It was one more step forward, the success of the election, a step forward made possible because of each and every one of those Iraqis who voted acted, each declaring, here I stand, no longer bowed by tyrants and murderers, an act by which a lady or some chap asserted their dignity and it is each of them in each his own actions which made the election a success.The election was merely a confirmation of that fact. History was made, as it has been each day since the fall of Saddam, by each Iraqi, and thus the possibilties ahead each Iraqi faces is latent in the actions of each today, each his onw actions and thus in co-incidence and conjointly , each acted to assert their liberty which is the dignity of each man and woman. A bad day, indeed, for the socialistos and their immoral, destructive fantasies paraded as `hope’ for man. History begins and ends with the individual, in and out of their dignity and liberty.The individual, is the goal of history, it could be said, for the individual is the supreme end in this life.

Post a Comment
*Required
*Required (Never published)
 

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image