Mangled Thoughts

First, you would have to find a map.

It has just been related to me, the greenies had attempted, recently, to have maps of Tasmania’s map districts destroyed. True. The medja haven’t reported this, and I can’t guess why, unless it has everything to do with the medja doing their best to provide free progaganda services for the greenies, and local, states and federal politicans doing their level best to impose greeny bunk such as the Kyoto toilet paper. Then,the alternative energy scams and, EPAs and a large number of other stasiland impositions to make greenies feel happy. Indeed, it’s a contest between Bracks, Campbell and Brown for the Pol Potian of the Year award.

Man causes global warming, is nothing more than, claiming, man is a master puppetteer of the universe. That is what the major parties have, properly considered, embraced, beliefs worthy of primitive tribesmen, indeed Islamo-fascists. Mike Jericho of, Eurabia Update has the latest on mullahs in Britain and their great contribution to science, cancer in particular, and specifically, women who have cancer and women who might incur cancer. Stunning, muslim hugging lefties really should take a peek at their great discoveries and advances, as well as the joys of being a woman in Iran. Spiffing , absolutely. And the greenies are no goddamned better, on science that is.

Here’s the drift, the greeenies were working to have maps destroyed, I’ll elaborate below why but, clearly the maps are just a white capitalist male oppressor’s device. So, how would geography, cartography and navigation fare in a school stuffed with greenies? Perhaps something like this.

`Good morning kiddy winkies. ( the kiddy winks are 13 old teenagers) I’m your new geography teacher, my name is Bob Brown (/ Nettles/ any other greeny pol potian moron you care to nominate). Now, have your new maps been issued yet?’

Class: Yes Sir, Madm, It’
It: Good.

Where is Australia, can you find it on the globe? Take out your globes, have a look, and find Oz.

Yes, It.

That, It, is out of date, isn’t it, It?

No, boy, that’s the latest earth friendly map , a marvellous advance in our knowledge of the earth.

No, it’s not, It, that’s the Pergamum of Crate’s globe of c.180.

Rubbish biy, don’t speak back to me. When I say it’s a modern map, it is is right. Good. Now pull out your atlas.

Press your thumb on the pic to have a close up.

I study ancient history at home…
What, boy, what’s that you say!
My dad, he’s Professor of Greats at…
So, boy, you’re an elitist capitalist earth killer are you, take this.
(Thwack, ouch.)

Find Australia.. no, stupid boy, it’s there,see!

What, what, what boy, stop laughing. Now, find Tasmania:

But it’s a tablet, the Babylon map of the world, c. 600B.C.!
Rubbish, boy go stand in the corner and put on the dunces cap, now, boy.

F

Right, find Hobart.

That’s the Gasur Tablet, 2000B.C….
Be quiet, Boy… it’s not, it is the latest, most modern map produced yet.

Enough of Geography, now for navigation. Take out your survey maps for the lakes disticts.

Itis…,It, the page is blank.

Precisely, the finest map produced. It is the spirit map of the aborigines.

What’s it supposed to show.

Why, boy, that’s the wilderness pristine, pure and untouched.

But , it, It , is only the lakes…

Not just the lakes district, boy, this is Mudder Nature at her most virginal, isn’t she booootiful.

But, SirIt, how is a body to find their way in the district with a blank, ah, map?

Being Pristine Wilderness boy, Mudder Nature will guide you.

That’s bloody useless, why my father had to lead a search party to rescue some bloody morons called greenies.

That’s it, boy, off to the re-education camp for you.

Yes, readers, the greenies wished to have all the maps of the lakes district destroyed and for thei cult of that evil bitch Mudder Nature. they went furth, asserting that bit of rubbish, it is pristine wilderness, it should not be mapped, and that any one who goes there should, well, just walk through it. Burke and Wills discovered the joys of doing just that.

It was, apparently, a close thing. And the medja didn’t mention a word of what was being given some consideration by the politicians in govt. It took a bit of pressure, apparently, to stop the greeenies on this.

These are are the morons, whose notion of economics is a worthy tribute to Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, for whom the major parties fereely overthrow private property rights, lease rights, impose `anti-global warming controls’, shut down grazing, forestry, and steal more private property on top.

What else are they but savages, and not just on economics They would destroy or, rather , sacrifice maps and science on the sacrificial stinking altar to the evil bitch those bastards, lead by Brown and Nettles worship. Medieval, worse than that, real stone age Ug Ug stuff is what those nostril pickers are banging on about.

That is what the major parties embrace too, just on the count of man causes global warming and nasty capitalist pig man must be controlled.

No wonder the medja didn’t run any reports on what the greenies had attrempted to do. If all the bunk they’ve spouted to date has not discredited them, and it hasn’t, since the Coalition parties also embrace the garbage of environmentalism and Kyoto, then, surely their aim, not to destroy copies of maps but destroy maps full stop, surely must , finally, disclose to the public what they are, and what the major parties are aiding and abetting by acting on some of the garbage those pol potian savages are banging on about.

So, beginning with the Govt. of Tasmania, hand over all the evidence so the public can read just what a pack of primitive, savage cavemen the greenies are.

Amazing, the greenies have not yet plumbed the depths of commie stupidity but, by crikey, they are making a good fist of it.

Gee, this pic. of `Bob Brown’ doesn’t quite distil how rotten and demented they are:

My solution to the greeny infestation has something to do with using a fine pair of, for fun, pleasure and feral animal eradication:

Yes, the headlines are splashed with, customs claim baggage handlers steal passengers’ goods and smuggle drugs.If so, then charge them. Does that help Corby, not yet. They would still have to identify anyone who did as Corby claimed.

The Corby defence cannot start cheering, they have work to do, if she is innocent and yet, the object is not innocence but, for the puropse of the appeal, whether the defence furnishes evidence suffienct to warrant quashing the verdict.

It does seem, Keelty made another silly remark in public after all, though, again, while it is customs which are cited, allegations are not good enough, and trial by media is not good enough. If the allegations are ture, the only procedure is laying of charges and let the courts do the work.

I’ll stick by what I wrote yesterday, the feeding to media of stories is atrocious conduct.

Someone , commenting at the blog of Faris Q.C made an interesting comment: the weigfht of Corby’s bag when she checked it in at the desk, Brisbane, and the weight with 4ks, 8lbs, a large difference. That would depend on whether passenger ticketing records and so linked luggage details are retained and for how long.That would be one leg of evidence, more is required.

First off, why would anyone attempt to smuggle marijuana into Indonesia?

1.The buyers are westerners, who buy only from westerners, out of fear of undercover Indonesian police posing as sellers. nd is from westerners is a market for imported marijuana

2. The price of high grade weed in that market is $30,000 to $40,000 per kilograms.
In the plastic bag in Corby’s travel bag was 4 ks., $120,000 to $160,000 worth of marijuana.

The marijuana found in the bag was analysed, it was high grade marijuana.

Secondly, what was the objective of the prosecution, and what was the objective of the defence?

The prosecution had to tie the bag of marijuana to Corby, demonstrate that marijuana was her possession.

The defence had to establish to the contrary, showing either the evidence the prosecution laid out before the Judges did not tie that bag to Corby or, lay out evidence which shows, while the prosecution’s evidence might have satisfied the charges against Corby, in fact it Corby was innocent, that it was not hers that, as their claim was planted by some-one else.

The defence went further, they specified the drugs were inserted at Brisbane airport , to be taken to Sydney.

The first mistake Corby’s defence made was to refuse the Australian Govt’s. offer of the services of two Q.C.s, pro bono.

The second was the letter to the President of Indonesia to intervene. The implication, even if the President is ever inclined in any case to intervene, is vicious, it would be tantamount to over-riding courts and judiciary, suborning them to the President’s whim, the Corby case aside, this readily opens up th e prospect of perversion of justice. Other objections can be raised against this mistake such as, pleas to the President are pleas for clemency by those convicted of crimes. Rants about corruption of Indonesian Govt. aside, irrespective of whether they be false, true , or exaggerated, the Indonesian govt. is not noted for nay such overt intervention, nor, for that matter, for attempting to suborn judges.

The third was to fight the case through the media in Australia and thus, having sought to bring political pressure on not only the President of Indonesia to intervene in Corby’s case, but upon the court to find in Corby’s favour. In other words, they did not fight the case where it had to be fought, in the court and according to rules of evidence, argument and principles informing due process and other matters fundamental to the conduct of a trial. They needed to satisfy the judges with the case they presented, not a pack of journalists in Australia stirring up emotion hostile to the court and now , it seems Indonesia ( Australia is descending into primitive tribalism in view of the increasing frequency of`collective’ hysteria and outpourings of emotion).

The fourth mistake was to mount as arguments mere assertions, heresay and mere character references. In contrast, to illuminate, the Judges found the prosecution had established the four elements which justified a verdict of guilty. On each element, the prosecution’s arguments were sound, they were, evidentially based and it is thus that they tied Corby to the drugs and as the one who brought them into Indonesia. The defence did not dint the arguments, which satisfied the negative tests entailed in having to demonstrate each of the four elements, which the prosecution did not on 2 elements but on all 4 elements.

Those who are saying the judge was capricious in `dismissing’ Corby’s evidence are evading that singular observation, the defences evidence was not evidence, it was heresay, character references and allegations, in addition to, for example, trying to discredit the four customs officers for which, that too, grounds were not delivered by the defence.

Mr. Peter Faris Q.C. has given a close examination of the case, based on the information he had available, and introduces his article with this telling point:

Is she guilty?
3. I do not know if she is guilty ? nobody but Corby knows that. I was not present during the commission of the alleged crime so I can form no independent judgment of the matter.
4. This means that the correct question is ? should she have been convicted?

In other words, guilt or innocence is not the issue, it is , did the verdict of guilty follow from what was laid out before the court, not just by the prosecution, but also by the defence.

Mr Faris concludes, yes, to the question, and gives a point by point explanation of why so.

If there is a flaw in, say the Judge’s reasons, that, surely will be examined and raised as a ground of appeal by defence lawyers . If there is something which contradicts prosecution evidence, they will raise that. if there is evidence they discover which upholds the claim of not guilty, they will raise it, in an appeal case.

The fifth mistake was, the defence lawyer did not seek evidence from Australia, particularly the airports, in order to establish the case, irrespective of what any available evidence might have shown when they were preparing their case.

The aim of the defence was to secure acquittal of the charge, irrespective of Corby’s innocence or guilt, since that was, and remains her plea. Her lawyers fought the case not in the court but in the Oz media. They badly advised Corby to not accept the offer of the services of 2 Q.C.’s made by the Australian Govt. They did not seek in Australia objective evidence to demonstrate any claim they would make, in order to demonstrate why the prosecutors had not satsfied the 4 elements required for a guilty verdict, why the prosecution’s claim could not be justly maintained, to establish doubt at least sufficient that a verdict of not guilty was justified.

They had attempted to pre-empt the court, even have the by the letter sent to the President of Indonesia influence it in some way by sending that letter to the President. Through the media in Australia they launched a campaign aimed at discrediting the court and the trial judges. Trying to smear the judges served no good purpose at all. The judge reflected in his reasons of judgment, Indonesian Law, the courts and justice will be upheld and will not be compromised by yielding to public campaigns mounted in the media. I read that statement to be a reflection on the media campaign in Australia launched by the defence. The Judge made plain before the trial, the trial will be just, the judges are impartial, are objective, cannot be compromised suborned in order to favour either side, and reasserted that in that same passage in the published reasons for judgment. In other words, if there is any flaw in the reasoning, it is not because the Jurist deliberately erred, nor sought to hand down a flawed judgment for, say, corrupt reasons.

It was not a bright `tactic’ of the defense to attack the Indonesian Court and Judiciary before, during and straight after the trial, through the media, and uttering this sort of nonsense to do so,` in 500 cases of drug trafficking/possession the trial Judge has not acquitted even one defendant’. What is that nonsense supposed to mean, apart form the clear cut, naked insinuation of:

That he found 500 guilty of trafficking /possession, shows that he is, somehow, ill disposed against anyone charged with trafficking/ possession, a-priori biased against any such defendant and will hang anyone regardless of the evidence.

Ipso facto, Corby would not receive a fair trial, and, the verdict shows she did not? The defence lawyer did not fight the case in the court, she did not bother to consider what the Judge will have to have put before him if he was to acquit Corby, she ran a campaign, which the medja all too readily seized upon and developed, rather stupidly at that. The weekend editions of the newspapers were indeed, running the line, Corby was done in.. that is is what it amounts too, as, for example, Mao’s Melbourne Age, Saturday the 28th shows in lurid detail.

That, after all , is one of the functions of an appeals court ,to correct decisions if a judge has erred. Taking up the cudgel and crying, the Judge had it in for Corby, she was doomed from the very first, was a blinder , which will also serve her appeal not one bit of good at all. The appeal has to be soundly run.

In view such a shoddy defence, Corby might have been fortunate in being handed a 20 year sentence only, the Prosecution believes the judge was lenient.

What is surprising, in view of the above, the defence has decided to lodge an appeal so soon after the completion of the trial. Corby would have been best advised to wait before lodging the appeal, accept the services pro bono of 2 Q.Cs the Prime Minister has offered Corby, and let them work through and sort out what is a complete mess, a right cock-up of the defence’s own doing.

A cock up which is bad enough if she is guilty, and it is worse if she is innocent. Assume the second, the defence have to work fast and hard at rectifying a bad case in order to mount a sound appeal, if they are secure an acquittal. If she is guilty, if she proceeds with the appeal, and with nothing more to add by way of new evidence, her defence will have to work hard at averting the jeopardy of a harsher penalty that might be imposed on failure of the appeal. Indeed, that is now the risk she runs even if she is innocent, that is how defective her defence was.

Much has been made of the lack of forensic evidence, such as fingerprints and the origins of the marijuana. That the marijuana came from Australia was not contested, as far as I understand, the Brisbane Airport to Sydney Airport story put by the defence concedes that anyway. As for fingerprints, in the first instance, some surfaces, say waxed metal, or plastic do not retain prints or prints which are sufficiently detailed for analysis. It sounds counter-intuitive but, fingerprints are only circumstantial evidence, even in Australian courts, which entails, such adds to demonstrate a claim only by agreement with major evidence. The lack of such evidence as fingerprints does not affect not only what the defence must demonstrate, but what the prosecution must demonstrate. There-in is the difference between the tow sides, the prosecution tied the bag to Corby, they showed she was its owner, they showed she brought in the marijuana. If Corby is innocent, and she might well be, her lawyers set nothing out which substantiated her claims.

One upshot of the media campaign is worth noting:

The reaction to the declaration public by the Federal Police Chief Mr. Keelty, allowing that some of his public statements might seem odd, allegations that baggage handlers are engaged in packing drugs into passengers’ luggage are baseless., certainly during that period .

At this stage, if Corby is innocent, what is required is for the defence to secure the evidence which establish that and that evidence, right now, is the police in Australia;ia identifying, according to her claim, baggage handlers at Brisbane and Sydney which the defence allege inserted the drugs. Faris provides an explanation the medja have not managed to set out which shreds the claim. Then there is declaration of the Federal Police Chief Mr. Keelty, allowing that some of his public statements might seem odd, allegations of baggage handlers engaged in doing the sort of thing alleged by the defense are baseless.

Attacking Mr. Keelty for that statement misses the point, he was stating as a fact what the Federal Police are satisfied with, and notice this, to make allegations baggage handlers are involved in drug trafficking and use their jobs to ensure drugs are smuggled is a serious charge against the baggage handlers at Sydney and, Brisbane airports. Tampering with baggage, is one thing, and grievous enough but, to falsely accuse anyone of a type of major crime is shocking , with hideous ramifications such as, the [perversion of justice and, the consequences for anyone who is accused of a major crime on the mere say so of anyone, and not just Corby’s defence.

Let us be quite clear about this, contrary to anyone who says , Keelty was wrong to declare in public, no, that allegation is false, Keelty actually did the correct thing, in clearing up that allegation. The baggage handlers were a soft target, since the allegations were preceded by the discovery of some, and some only, had tampered with baggage, which is not the same as stuffing drugs into passenger’s luggage, as reprehensible as tampering is. Correcting a false suspicion was the right thing to do.

The. If Corby is Innocent, trying to secure the conviction of baggage handlers on false accusations is also grievous, is a perversion of justice, to leave a false suspicion, much built up by the media ,against anyone hanging in the air is nothing less than a witch sniffing persecution to satisfy a public, whose emotions have been stirred up by the defence and the media, and as mistaken tactic by the defence. Yet, in choosing to do just that, make assertions which, though false, as Keelty stated, what the defence and the media did was target that the defence could make the soft target, by then , of the baggage handlers were a soft target, since the allegations were preceded by the discovery of some, and some only, had tampered with baggage.

If anybody believes that falsely accusing someone of a criminal act, a serious act, two acts, and a possible third crime, perversion of justice, should not be checked, stopped on the spot, consider the implications in this case:: smuggling and, using someone innocent to carry the drugs by shoving drugs into their bags and a third crime, thereby , if the drugs are discovered, it will be the victim who is arrested, convicted and sent to prison.

Now, that is what Mr. keelty clarified, the allegations against the baggage handlers raised by the defence are without foundation. He did the correct thing. That some have tampered with baggage is reprehensible as it is, and they have been sacked. It is, however, a shocking matter to proceed with false allegations of anything against anyone and more so when the allegations are of serious crimes against the targets .

One could illustrate this with some anecdotes of some in Australia who have been falsely accused of having committed some serious crimes. In one case, the matter did go to court. The judge threw the case out for what it was false, but, it was too late. The one who was falsely accused was so distraught that, at the end of the brief trial that that individual volitionally signed himself into a psychiatric hospital. Others, those who sought to damage someone, have merely asserted a false accusation and let it hanging , as it were, in the air, the mere assertion of it sufficient to damage the targets, the sheer distress some have gone through because they have been the targets of such vicious conduct being the effect sought.. Oh, yes indeed, Keelty did the right thing against what could reduce to perversion of justice, the incrimination of someone for grievous crimes they have not committed and, indeed , possibly, never would commit. If Corby is innocent, subjecting others to such treatment in order to mount a defence does not rectify Corby’s position , it is a very rotten, savage thing to do.

Indeed, by doing that, the defense has opened up the prospect of the prosecution, for the appeal case, doing what the defence failed to do in the first place, seek evidence from Australia , buy calling an Officer of the Federal Police to give evidence, and , should they be needed airport security and customs officers of Brisbane and Sydney

Keelty’s statement is independent of what, of course, the defence alleged in court.They had to substantiate the claim with evidence. The defence did not seek to discover evidence from the appropriate sources in Australia. Instead, the defence relied on such things as heresy, allegations, and character references, leaving the prosecution’s case intact.

What is surprising, in view of the above, the defence has decided to lodge an appeal so soon after the completion of the trial. Corby would have been best advised to wait before lodging the appeal, until she has accepted the services pro bono of 2 Q.Cs the Prime Minister has offered Corby, and let them work through and sort out what is a complete mess, a right cock-up of the defence lawyer’s own doing, before lodging an appeal.

Recollecting, if Corby is guilty, then she took her chances to make $130,000 to $160,000 by selling high grade marijuana in Indonesia. She did that, despite the public record of smugglers caught, convicted and their sentences,Indonesia, and that the position of the Indonesians on drugs and drug smugglers, and of other Asean Govts and courts, the believing Indonesian has is well understood for some decades notwithstanding. If she is guilty, she incurred the risk of being caught and dealt a harsh sentence. Agree or not with that position, that is the position of Indonesia and other Asean countries. If she is guilty, why did she believe she could get away with it when many other have not managed that feat?

If she is innocent, she erred in following her lawyer’s advice to refuse the offer of the 2Q.C for the trial and its preparation, and her position was eroded further by the approach her lawyer took in running the case. There is no point in attacking the trial judge when, her defence did great work on behalf of the prosecution. The prosecution did their job, the defence did not. The prosecution established all four elements were satisfied, they laid out evidence which tied Corby and the Marijuana together. It was on those grounds the Judge delivered the verdict of guilty.

Peter Faris Q.C. Summation and Analysis, . As Mr. Faris properly cautions, the trial and judgement transcripts are required before a complete and accurate analysis can be laid out.

The doughty Rodney Hide has come across tapes, recordings of N.Z. police as the bungled about, giggled, did anything but tdo their duty. Police told Search and Rescue Co-ordination centre they ahd despatched a helicopter to rescue the crew of the sip which sunk November last year, the Iron Maiden. They hadn’t. In fact, they had sent the stand by pilot home. Over 2 hours later that night, after much badgering by the SRCC, the police sent of a ehol and told SRCC, they had sent, not have, had, sent a helo. The police can be heard saying, at after 9p.m., over 2hours after the crew had sent their mayday signal, `We are receiving a very good signal form the distress beacon, that is good… we have to confirm it though, because we have waited for the satellite to pass overhead again..’ A v. good signal, 2 hours after the mayday, what a stupib, bloody moron that policeman on the end of the radio must be.

Great signal…oh, the two crewmwen, oh them, dunno, they’re not the beacon are dey.

That sums up the police response. One girly said, the area was too far away for the helo. It was only 12 minutes flight away.

At 12 minutes, as soon as the mayday had been received , the helo should have been despatched and what time is involved bewteen ordering helo and its arrival? 15 minutes, 20 minute? As opposed to,over 2 hours.

Hide wants an inquiry, better than that, Mr. Hide, the police and the responsible police officers should be flogged. What they are culpable of , inlcuding the Minister is tantamount to murder . Cetainly , the crew might have died very soon after they sent their signal but ,what the minister and those police officers are culpable for is as good as manslaughter.

Mr. Hide has the recordings on line at his blog. They are shocking to listen too when it is recollected, while those commie criminal assholes lead by Helen Clark and Her Police Minister and Police Officers were fucking about, two men were fighting for their lives .

Police 111 system in action Posted by Rodney @ 4:03 pm on 27 May 2005
I have got the audio up with the calls between the Rescue Co-ordination Center and the Police the night the Iron Maiden sunk.

Be afraid, be very afraid ? this could been you or your loved ones.

I have today found out that the helicopter pilot went home when the police stood him down. It?s not his fault. The police told him he wasn?t needed.

The medja not accurately reporting the verdict on Michelle Corby.

Broadcasters, having advertised real time relay of the delivery of the verdict are doing exactly the opposite. Brief snatches are of a barely audible intepreter.

The Medja have pushed Corby’s side.

The verdict has been handed down. Guilty.

Odds on betting, I’ll ponder them, book not yet open.

Dee has raised something to ponder , in comments below.

The sentence is 20 years. Fuck. Poor girl. It is terrible. I might have seemed callous below, but…and worse, if it is a miscarriage of justice.

The whole bloody point is prohibitionism. Let’s take tobacco, the Oz, in the name of that mystical beast, dah national health has imposed hefty excises, and put tobbaco selling under govt. monopoly, raw tobacco, for example, is stored in building in Qlnd. and it is protected likie Fort bloody Knox. Taken, with spending on police to enforce its tobacco `laws’ we have in effect, stasliand force applied to somethining which is none of the govts business.

What is the real evil of the drugs trade, Prohibitionism which has made the trade highly profitable for: real, vicious criminals, and gangstars and their thugs employed to enforce it.

If she appeals, and loses her appeal, the penalty can be increased!

Meanwhile, to contradict myself, the Indons treat Muslim Islamo massmurdering assholes to a pandy on the bottom with a paddle pop, the Oz govt. sends a couple of billion of `economic aid’ which will line only the pockets of a corrupt govt. and Islamo fascists and, Corby in for 20 years for marijuana. Govts. are a fucking joke.As for the assholes in Indonesia, Aid, fuck Aid, so those louses and their mass murdering Islamo-fascists can live the high life… what a pack of first rate assholes. Mind, that is the lot whom the ALP, through Gareth Evans, handed over the East Timorese to.

Did Arthur Paton M.C. live high. Bloody oath did. A tall and true war story, charging an artillery battery of 8, destroying 4 guns and killing three crews, with enemy infantry close by, before withdrawing, is just one of his many escapades, stitches this obituary together.

Published some weeks ago by the Telegraph, here it is in:

(Continued)

Mad Mullahs are whining, the U.S. is `mishandling ‘ the Koran. The Koran is as ugly, aestehtically, as the dribble pured out by Oz Yartz Council yobs. Worse, some U.S. officially is humbly explaining, they are taking great pains to stamp out Koran abuse. Blaaaaaaaaaah, that guy should wash his mouth out. (Oh, fuck off Steve Bracks, and the whirling dervishes you havestuffed the benches with in in judicial robes.)

A copy of a book is a copy and, it is private property. I might be tempted to buy a copy of the Koran but, I don’t wish to clog the toilet’s u-bend, and, I don’t wish to waste good money on ugly bilge.

Funny isn’t it, leftoids burn bibles, the Oz, U.S., NZ, Brit. flags and , all and sundry have to be hailed before a blasphmey court for saying, Islam is worse than a load of rubbish, the Koran the Communist Manifesto of the Arab-Turkic world and , bugger it, our Asean neighbours.

Gee, the Koran is os fucking precious why would the assholes commite sacrilige by using paper to print such sacred crap on it, the Crap of MadMohammedAllah. BTW, Mohammed spent a lot of time on the crapper, being as full of shit as he was.

Murph, at Special Sauce, has a good summary of the prosecution and defence cases, and his conclusion sums up Corby’s defence, Corby: Pt 892. Kev, while he was not altogether firm on it,plumped last week Corby is guilty. I had argued the baggage scandal might have sown reasonable doubt but, observed, the Indonesian courts seem to run on, defendants in criminal cases have a burden of proof. Reasonable doubt, but, the Oz Govts’. letter to Corby’s lawyer is worth nothing at all as far as what is required , evidence , remarking that the jubilation of lawyers ove that latter was, frankly, silly.

Last weekend, a newspaper splashed photos of some of Corby’s family. Her father wastes his days smoking pot, someone else had spent time in an hotel for crims. The family has form, a lot of lbs of it in the green leaf form.

4ks, a tad over 8lbs of marijuana, not exactly a personal use quantity. The trial judge has , in an interview, many who have been caught trafficking have done the smae in court, cried, proclaimed their innocence and so forht. Understandable, but not a guide , as the judge observed, as to innnocence or guilt.

The underlying coonsideration, it is no secret, the Indons keenly hunt drug traffickers and slap down harsh penalites, and yet, some Aussies still persist in attmepting to do so, and delude themselves they can get away with it. They clearly do not take in one tittle of the long list of reports of smugglers caught and banged into an Indon hotel either on death row or for a life sentence and, by life sentence that is what is dealt out.

The death penalty for traffickers is odious, and 30 years rather more than a tad odious too, and both out of proportion to the sentences hanbed out to Muslim mass murderers. As vicious as all that is, nonethless that is the position of the Indons. Dumb Aussie youfs, no they are not, they took their chances despite the fact that is the siutation in INdonesian and, they were caught. All those, including the medja, screaming how terrible the Indons are, conveniently overlook, the stupid would not be facing a life sentence or death penalty if, she had not been a pothead in the first instance and went on to try her luck as a trafficker via Indonesia.

Kev has commented on a letter in which a writer seems rather confused, Kev, being the gentleman he is, doens’t say the writer is off the planet:

{a} The real issue is not whether Schapelle Corby did it or not, but {b} whether the sentence will be life imprisonment or death.

If {a} is not germane to anything much at all to anything Corby has done, then the Judges would not be contemplating {b}. That writer must have lobotomised himslef with his pen, he stuck it up his nostril and punctured the few ounces of grey matter he is in possession of.

{a}Both the media and the politicians have misread the Australian public on this issue. {b}There is anger out there that a Muslim cleric is getting a few short years for arranging a bombing that killed many Australians, {C}yet this young woman faces a life sentence or death. That?s the issue!

{a} Funny that one, the medja have been beating the Corby fan club drum loudly, everyday. The pollies have too, and, funny that, Howard and Downer wrtoe that letter in order to avert what Corby is facing.

{b} and {c} are not linked. Yes, of course some are utraged on the count of {b}, but not necessarily angry over {C}, some may be, both Murph and Kev having fulminated against both possible sentences, and one is revulsed at both too. Yet, that is the position of the Indons, and, the Govt. cannot, for blindingly obvious reasons, do anything but, for example, send a strongly worded letter on the count of both of them, which it has in the case of {B}, and has intervened , by the latter in view of {c}.

No matter how many fulminate, including yours truly, we are yet brought back to the hard stubborn fact, the Indons take a very dim view of drug trafficekrs, and, when they catch them, dish out very stiff sentences. Dersptie that being the positon, Corby decided she would make theattmept, beleiving,, no doubt , she was cleverer than the Indon police and customs inspectors and, get away woith the crime. Well she didn’t, they risk she took has been realsied, she faces a long stay in an Indon hotel or, an early death. That is what the case boils down too.

Other Aussies contemplating what sommany have already failed to do, might ponder the fate of Corby, but the gang of nine also. It is false sentiment to cry when, traffickers, inlcuding Corby, are fully apprised before attempts of the hard stubborn facts of the Indon position on traffickers and trafficking is. As horrific as the sentences are, that sentiment is quenched somewhat by reminding oneself, she went there, she did it, despite the fact she was nbot ignorant of the risks. She took her chance, good, she was caught, now she must face the consequences and that is all there is too it. Let Corby and so many otrhers be a waringing to pothead assholes contemplating a `selling’ trip to not only Inodn, but Malaysia, Thailand, China, and oh, a rather longish list of Asiatic countries.

There are those for whom compassion ,and a willingness to fight for them, is well warranted, Corby is not one of them.

From yesterday afternoon’s session of the Coven.

That was a turn up, contrary to what I mulled over this morning, the Coalition did bash the Bracks lead spivs over grazing in the highlands but, are they in a position to act? The Coalition spoiled the effect, however, by waxing lyrically about how much they doing to make Aussies obey Kyoto. The ALP are worse, they, apparently, hold the Treaty isn’t strict enough, and, needless to say, what the Fed. is doing falls short of imposing a `proper’ Pol Potian regime. One ALP m.p. declared, the summer weather we are enjoying, or was, winter is definitely winging its way in now, is `proof’, man is destroying the climate and guilty of of a great evil. How many times do they have be to be told that, to the second, “bunk”, to the former, when using toilet paper, flush it down the sewer.

The ALP, opposing the tax cuts, asserts, repeatedly through its memebers, their objection is not about envy and class warfare, and then each one proceeds to demonstrate just that, `its about making the rich richer’, and, `it’s not fair’. Playing a game by its rules is `fair’. Economics and law are not games, yet , that is, at bottom what the ALP detest. Beazely, in a censure motion against the ALP, lambasted the P.M. for imposing worn out, early 20th cnetury `ideals’ on Aussies and then said, they are destroying the delicate `fabric’ and `ideals’ of Oz which the LAP established 50 years ago. They are not bright boys at all, socialism is a worn out and destructive `ideal’ of the 18th to nineteenth centuries.

What is not just, and is immoral, is stealing private property and with it, forcing the decent to pay for an army of dumbed down teenage girls with little bastards fathered by thuggishg youfs, with the govt. a, to follow FSFitzgerald on this, a Putative polygamous husband and father to umpteen little bastards. The former is itself criminal, the second compounding the immorality of the former, including stripping repsonsible men and women of the assets they earn and accumulate to prepare for marriaige and , acquit their resonsibilities to their own children. ALP memebers have been making it rather plain, those girls, and , the youfs, are entitled to breed like rabbits and be kept for it, it’s a right.

It is not just, it is not lawful, as another example, Medicare. A Scam of a command economy which drives up costs by multiples over a free market in medical services, and those in it on the supply side working out how to bring on services by lowering prices, yes indeed, and not serving customers but obeying govt. directives and grovelling to bureaucrats instead. It is not charity, medicare, for the destitute and, those whose incomes are such that some subsidisation by suppliers and, indeed, philanthropic associations might be in order. There is no charity in lumping those genuinely in need of services provided pro bono with the vast majority who can pay, were it not for the crippliing pricing impact of govt. connsumption which is Medicare. There is nothing moral about Medicare.Medicals are consumtpion items, they too are not a `right’ to be saitsfied on imperious demand. Medicare is a grotesque fraud which will end up as the Britsh NHS and the others of France , Germany, Sweden, U.S., a stinking heap of trash.

The Cabinet’s measures, to remove some off the wrong hip pockets, don’t go far enough. What has to happen is, they need to work up the spine and say, from this date, no teenager who falls pregnant will be paid a pension, and any who do, their onw families , including of youfs who father the bastards, can bloody well look after their idiot children and grand-children, if their children are so odiously impecunious. The effect would be rapid and noticeable. They have to work up the spine and face what the reality of Meciare is , a grotesque fraud and, get oput of th emarket and free it up.

Just as when the Whitlam govt. initiated the pension , teenage girls were attracted to it like a magnet, the numbers of young girlies willing to bear bastards to shiftless scumbags would drop off fast.End of problem. The femmo-nazis understand that, after all, in pushing their version of marxism the crucial requirement is, govt. must fund their wish list, and pensions for dumbed down girlies spreading their legs and getting pregnant by scumbags of youfs willy nilly, happened to be on item ticked off the wish list.

The ALP is a Party of the Past, an old fashioned socilaist party, intent on stripping the prudent of their hard eaned, not kept, earnings and `redistrubiting it’. They have made it plain enough these last few days, they find nothing wrong iin using the offices of govt. to do nothing less than engage in crime, the Bracks and carr Govts. are a very good guide. They have delievered many another old fashioned statement which promise protectionism, mercantilism, debt, keynesian bastardry heightened.

The Carr govt. is a billion or so in debt. This was disclosed by the coalition. To conceal the fact, the Carr cabinet altered the accounting rules. It aslo revoked an Act which, Carr and Co. had raised and steered through the N.S.W. Parliament binding the N.S.W. cabinet to financial trasparency. Funny that, Vic. has several Acts on similar lines and, without having rescinded them, the Bracks govt. is in breach of them - in other word, are they not grounds for prosecuting the Bracks Cabinet? Why not, they are in breach of Acts which the Cabinet must comply with.

Who said this, and what is being described:

Lets tell everyone that this is neither pro-science nor pro the people, this tells the elite that all its silly laws are for the stupid plebs,”ignorance generator”.

ALP members,

A Muslim Cleric

A barrister quit the ALP and socialism, and he had been a staunch party man, because the Unions and the politicial wing hold, effectivley, that line. He wasn’t disgruntled, he was shocked and ashamed to have been a member of the Party for the sheer contempt it treats even , and get this, the `plebs’ within the party, and, within the unions. he witnessed it from deep within the ALP and its wings.

It is however, a Mulsim cleric who, dying, has come out with and declared, Islam is a cult of death, that it is evil, and has called on senior clerics to , for once in their criminal lives cofess it and make a break with Islam. This really does make Vic’s. HEROC and the Bracks Commie govt. look like the totalitarain assholes they actually are, and that craven totalitarain judge who joined in the persecution of the tow pastors.

The link is over at Melanie Philips, a Western Heart will take you there too (The End is Nigh. . .
by James Ozark,“I’m sure it was the left who was squealing that the end does not justify the means when criticising the iraq war…”.)

Potkin Azarmeher has translated the letter from the Arabic, and, he has some more fascinating itmes on his site such as,What the BBC didn’t Report from IRI Elections, which next to election fraud committed by the clerics, includes,effectively, the murder of a former Prime Minister opposed to the totalitarain savage rule of the Imams.

(Yah, Steve Bracks, ram your blashpemy Act right up your stinking Stalinist Backside, you lying ,,theiving commie bastard).

Paul’s entertaining record of the Cornelia Rau controversy, has its Parlaimentary parallel,

Cornelia Rau- I?m Not Nutsby Paul @ 12:43 pm. Filed under Barking Moonbats
And if you don?t believe me, just ask my friend the 8 foot irridescent green penguin over there??.

Crazy she may be, but not daft enough to miss out on a sling if offered.

UPDATE Amnesty International also thinks we?re heartless swine
In a press release which whiffed strongly of being penned by leftist lawyer and ratbag busybody Claire O?Connor, Rau accepted no responsibility for her detention, despite giving a false name to police and DIMEA and claiming to be an illegal immigrant.

Yesterday, 5 Coaltion M.P.s decalred their opposition to the measures, well detention really, against illlegal immigration. Mao’s Little Red Age, and, Fat Aunty Bolshevik Collective screamed, `massive backbench revolt’. Gee a whole 5 of them in a Caoltion holding, how many seats - of course, one can see their point, they need to get even for the internal ALP coup detats, Slimey Simey Crean, then Blatters Lathers and, now, Cap’n Blowhard Toot Me Tug-Boat Willy Horn Beazely, for the second time around.

It was the basis of the censure motion against the Prime Minister, or rather allegations againt Prime Minster and cabinet on , the conduct of the inquiry claiming cabinet had suppressed it, the minster’s adminsitrative competence, and sundry matters. I might post some of the debate. A load of rubbish the ALP mounted. The fruitiest moemnt came, however, when a Coalition Speaker, disclosed, the ALP, having set up detention centres for illegals under Hawke and Keating, had a few goofs on their watch, many a goof but, unlike the Rau and the Alvarez cases, they might be genuinely scanadalous,. What a pack of ranting hypocrites the ALP is. And what were the leftoid media doing all through those long years of the Hawke-Keating Govts. ?

No need to guess, it can be reasonably concluded that, as they have done on other scandals and scams of ALP Govts. and Ministers, the media , no doubt, covered uyp for them. The leftoid medja are faithful ALP cocksuckers, as the example of those journalists who perverted the course of justice, in aiding and abetting a certain commie, but now long dead, ALP corrupt former Attrorney General, one Lionel Murphy.

ALP, like their medja fan club, never lets stubborn facts stand in the way of lying and defamation. I shall put up the juicy bits on this tomorrow. Ah, yes, sookie leftoids, after damaging many others cry the longest and loudest when the shit they thrwo also hits them, and by that, never in the same measure as to what they do unto others on a tremednous scale. One cannot forget Lathers savaging Hollingworth, and in contempt for the Supreme Court of N.S.W. from the safety of the Coven. Little Blatters Lathers screamed, wailed, gnashed his teeth, having furnished his tedious private affairs to the public’s attention, woiuld stamp and cry, `Leave my family alone’. Underneath it all, he is a spineless, sookie leftoid cad.

Lastly, Pol Pot’s favourite little bastard, but a very wealthy little bastard - which is funny about many a commie , like Che and Castro, spoiled upper middle class brats turned mass murderers or, in Little Petey’s case, just a sookie slob who enjoys the life of a professional mendicant… Ha, yes, Pine Nut head, prattled on about `Aussie whales’ For the benefit of overseas readers, though Petey claims to hold an LLB, he is a complete moron,

He has leanred off by heart the lines Beazely and Rudd have delivered this week already, soo quickly Petey? Did they stick a gold star in your busybook. And so, as Rudd and his brave TugBoat Commander have this week, demanded the `Govt. take Japan to the I.C. Court’.

The ALP, already sucking up to that criminal bastard Anan and his pack of thugs and, demanding Aussies bend over for a right rogering by those partrons of mass murderers, are of sound International socialisto credentials. Their ICC demand shows, mind one of infantile teenagers bludding because someone dared to say no to them. They also sound as demented as the bloody greenies and, that is no mean feat . After all, look what they are up there with, fuck, Bob Brown and , what’s her name, that evil bitch from the West, Allyson, that’s the bitch. Way to go, Cap’n Blowhard, and Chipmunk Boy.

Meanwhile, I’ve sent further assurances to the Sun King and the Japanese Prime Ministerto the effect: the Oz P.M.’s letter is of no momment, that, evil foes in Oz lead by ALP and Greenies of Hunters are, despite appearances, a minor cult of lunatics being abandoned by Aussies in large numbers. the ALP , the Greens, Bob Brown, the Dems, Peter Garrett, might have numbers, in Parl.,but they are dwindling fast. You have the go ahead, I wrote, that is the tacit message of the P.M’s missive: You have, I continued, Australia’s unstinting support. They replied, we deduced that from what was not said in your P.M’s. letter. Good, I replied.

During the night, they whisked me away in a VSTOL stratrojet and landed on a whaling ship. What a treat they put on. I shot a minky using the old manual technique, shaft and rope from a longboat, and aright whale with the cannon launched harpoon with explosive head. Just put that in to make DB’s envious and to send the greenies and ALP right round the bend. I wonder whether they are the `Aussie whales’ the ALP claim are being murdered by the Japs. I didn’t notice them waving Aussie passports or, perhaps they were doing an Alavarez, neither was the Oz Flag tattooed across their fat bums. I hope they were `Aussie whales’ ( ha , ha , ha,ha to , Petey Garrouted Boy).

Yes, Lord D has stepped in and rescued Ocker -Sino relations from a near disaster . A near disaster fomented soley by the the even more moronoic type of crapologers,the ALP and Greenies. Bloody heck, Beazely and Rudd are not in Govt and they manage to do that, nearly bring on a second Ocker- Jap war, brilliant, just brilliant, a cunning feat worthy of Baldrick and Black Adder.

Aussies would be `properly’ rooted if they were to be lobbed onto the cabinet benches.Downer’s speech on ALP’s record in F.A. and in fighting real tyrants, was a timely reminder what the sods are capable of doing to the good, instead of to the evil.

ALP clinging to one of the most destructive set of beliefs and aims in the history of civilisation makes them look worse than late 19th -20th century man. More like , cavemen, Neanderthals - a bleading miracle, some actually survived the crushing , imperialist onslought of homo-sapien man. No, not cave-men but, cave-trolls. For those in the ALP disturbed by what it is infested with, their are two solutions, start clubbing the trolls , and exchange destructive lunacies for reason and principle or, better still, quit the party as well. Socialism is a speudo-rational religion, and it is one of violence, destruction and has brought death to vast numbers. To this, they might ponder what in the fuck are they doing embracing Pol Pot’s heirs, the greenies and took one of them in, Peter Garrett - to clue them in, DDT and the mass murder, effectively, of African children due to malaria as the consequence. A Party that can embrace a sookie, selfish , stupid git like Garrot head, and stuff its shadow cabinet with completely barking commie morons is a Party that is well on the way to where it belongs, in the gutters.

It sounds like Senator McGauran, Coalition, who is waxing lyrically on the `Commonwealth Games’ and what a great `investment ‘ it is, and all its components such as `infrastructure’.

What seems to have occurred, to evade the obvious , the crapologers dissemble by corrupting some more words, investment on the one hand, and, on the other hand, using `infrastructure’ as a loose term for for capital. There, see, the crapologers are market realists and thus real economic managers, it’s only a matter of just mastering the art of calling pixies businesses and, presto, one booming economy, a mere bagatelle really, anyone can do it, why Federale House is stuffed, every bench, with crapologers explaining why money comes from gold beraring pixies.

Yes , it is McGauran speaking. He is announcing, the Federal Govt. has set aside some more untold millions to plunge on the bllody Games.

Herald Sun, editorial, last week, is horrified at the expense of the games. No, not quite, they are scandalised the Vic. Govt. will fund first class accommodation and dining fare for `officials’ and , more imporatantly, politicians from `poor countries’. Well, quite and , booo bloody hoo, the poor little sods would otherwise have to stay in something less comfy. Gee, no wonder western crapologers and their `public servants’ detest the Swiss, not just that its a genuinly economiclaly open jount but, Swiss m.p.s are not crapologists and they and `public servants’ do no travel first class and dine high at the pig’s trough, no for they are humble to say, they are kept by real Swiss taxpayer and it is the height of isolence and ingratuidutide to do any less than travel at best second class and stay, at best, in second class and, forget haute cuisine, a McDonald’s will do them. But not Oz’s crapologers and the stasiland thugs called `pub;ic servants’, no, not these heroes of dah socialisto bruvverhood.A real insight into what is meant by `fair’ and `social justice’ in Oz, for the crapologers, and their pubic severers, have to dream up excuses and acquire an army of dependents to get away with stealing property in cargo ship loads to stuff their own bloody pockets with and acquire a spastic thing called a careerah and, generally, enjoy the high life they believe they are entitled to, even if it means spending those who are complled to pay for it into the gutters.

The H.S. is , however, Brack’s no.2 bum licker, second only to Mao’s little Red Age, and the Herald Sun, being Full of High rightie socialist sHhit, doesn’t object at all to the Bracksie Wacksie commie thugs spending spree until all drop down stony bloody destitute, whatsoever. Not at all, the Have a daily rightie socialist sHit disgrees only on farnarkling details,e.g. not $2million on that bozo, outrageous, when, that $2m should be spent on that sookie arsehole. That does sums up, the Herald Sun on its objection to the hotel fare for crapologers instead of, the criminal offence is the games, along with Govt. all the other spend and tax scams the crapologers dream up It is a marvellous rag at it, toady to keynesians, cocksuckers to commie bastards sitting in Spring St.

McGuaran is a Victorian. Is he a pillock? Perhaps this will help, he has explained a scheme, going by the acronym, FLIP, the Cabinet has decided to rob taxpayers some more to prop up dah film industry, entailing subsidies for `investors’ and replete with more stasiland regulations inclusive of license fees. Well that’ll keep one Empress of Blandings sized ham content, the Blue Wheezers soapie stud ham, Woods, and Fat Aunty Bolshevik Collective, indeed the whole bloody pack of `artistes’ of the flickering screen wild with delight, now they will be able to quadruple their output of the unwatchable made by the unwatchables. It puts the death of Gra Gra into perspective.

With the comic genius gone, the unwatchables find they are much safer from comparisons. What, with zoos schools turn out vast armies of uncouth,unwashed , anti-elitist, aesthetically untouched teenage pensioners, with pollies fully backing them with stolen property, today’s hams realise, there are fewer around to oppose the gravy train and prepared to tip the contents already poured down the sewer for once and for all.

FLIP that’s right. McGuaran has flipped too. Bracks is spending Victorians into the gutters, and the games is one of the many billion dollar plus spectaculars the Commie thugs have devised to ensure that, and what does McGauran have to say, Splendid, spiffing, wonderful brilliant.

Who needs leftie socialists when the Coalition is stuffed with them anyway.

Highland graziers have descended upon the Federales, this morning, in an attempt to convince the Feds to overthrow the Bracks shut-down of what little remained of cattle grazing in the Highlands.

The graziers are wasting their time. McGuaran comes from Victoria, the Victorian liberal Party is stuffed with Toorak Doctor’s wives who, too, are soaking wet lefty wombat sookie bitches. Thus, a McGauran.

Hmmn, new word for the lexicon of Craponology:

McGauron: vb. he’ll McGuaran you; regular declension: - ed, -ing

adjective- that act is McGaurna

Expletive McGauran!

and so forth through adverbs, nouns, pronouns, adjectival nouns

Aussies are being McGauraned and, one of the crapologers declares, it’s a splendid thing to do to the plebs.

Cattle grazing in the Highlands, 170 years of it and Bracks shuts it down to protect dah environment, sacking , once again, good old real taxpayers, backed by the McGauraners of the Vic Libs lead by Paper Doyley.

Cain and Kriner shut down logging in the highlands and closed down much of the grazing fields, issuing g60 `licenses’ with extensive restrictions attached.

The last bushfire I forget when , it wasn’t long ago - ripped through the highlands, due to the build up of fuel , due to the fact commercial forestry had been shut down and grazing shut down to barely a cow turd’s worth. That fire reduced to dust and ashes forest, animals and the rivers were chocked with the ashes form the bushfires.

And the commie spivs claim, it is to `preserve ‘ the `natural forest’. What a bloody joke only dumbed down commie morons can fathom.Forestry and grazing shut down , the sacrifice to satisfy the death goddess, that evilbith Mudder Nature and her darling sonny Jim, Pol Pot and his army of lice ridden devotees the greenies and their new fellow cult members, Steve Bracks and the ALP ( also fed. ALP) and, damn, the Vic. Libs and not a few in the Fed Coalition govt, why, look at that mad mullah Senator Campbell and his predecessor, Senator Kemp.

McGauraned by bloody McGaurans.