<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The mistakes made in Corby&#8217;s case were made by her lawyers.</title>
	<link>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2005/05/30/the-mistakes-made-in-corbys-case-were-made-by-her-lawyers/</link>
	<description>Free markets, capital, and entrepreneurs are the bedrock of civilisation.They dragged man out of the gutters,civilised him,dignified him,gave him liberty.Socialism is an excuse to pauperise untold millions,enslave untold millions,murder untold millions, over a century now: Why has the Liberal Party shifted to the code of savages?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dee</title>
		<link>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2005/05/30/the-mistakes-made-in-corbys-case-were-made-by-her-lawyers/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 03:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2005/05/30/the-mistakes-made-in-corbys-case-were-made-by-her-lawyers/#comment-499</guid>
		<description>A masterly summing up. As I read more details of this case, I'm inclined to think Corby's defence team should have gotten 20 years also (for   ineptitude).

What possessed them to refuse the offer of the Australian govt.? Why didnt they conduct the case along scientific lines - like insisting on fingerprinting etc., rather than playing the emotion card. Guess they are not very experienced - which poses another question.

Why was this team chosen in the first place, when there were far more experienced lawyers who would have taken the case. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A masterly summing up. As I read more details of this case, I&#8217;m inclined to think Corby&#8217;s defence team should have gotten 20 years also (for   ineptitude).</p>
<p>What possessed them to refuse the offer of the Australian govt.? Why didnt they conduct the case along scientific lines - like insisting on fingerprinting etc., rather than playing the emotion card. Guess they are not very experienced - which poses another question.</p>
<p>Why was this team chosen in the first place, when there were far more experienced lawyers who would have taken the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
