Before someone says, Nyeh, Nyeh, I’ll get it in
Yes, the headlines are splashed with, customs claim baggage handlers steal passengers’ goods and smuggle drugs.If so, then charge them. Does that help Corby, not yet. They would still have to identify anyone who did as Corby claimed.
The Corby defence cannot start cheering, they have work to do, if she is innocent and yet, the object is not innocence but, for the puropse of the appeal, whether the defence furnishes evidence suffienct to warrant quashing the verdict.
It does seem, Keelty made another silly remark in public after all, though, again, while it is customs which are cited, allegations are not good enough, and trial by media is not good enough. If the allegations are ture, the only procedure is laying of charges and let the courts do the work.
I’ll stick by what I wrote yesterday, the feeding to media of stories is atrocious conduct.
Someone , commenting at the blog of Faris Q.C made an interesting comment: the weigfht of Corby’s bag when she checked it in at the desk, Brisbane, and the weight with 4ks, 8lbs, a large difference. That would depend on whether passenger ticketing records and so linked luggage details are retained and for how long.That would be one leg of evidence, more is required.
Post a Comment