The China Policy, the Cabinet has Sir Humphreyed itself.

The ALPdoesn’t dissemble on it’s position toward China or, rather, the Peking Geriatric Buggery Club, just make Oz bend over for a right old rogering. The Coalition show a distinct shade of lunacy when it comes to China and the said club too, they haven’t needed the machinations of Sir Humphrey on this one, they’ve managed it by themnselves, though they might have lifted the plot from another source, some of which, the pertinent paragraphs :

A Victory for Democracy, Yes Prime Minister.

This is the time when a crisis broke, the communists attempt to grab St. Georges Island, the first the Prime Minister heard of it was sipping cocktails and exchangiing pleasantries with the American Ambassador. This , from the Ambassador might apply just as well to the bent over poistion of the Coalition and the ALP, and come to it, describes many of their domestic policies too:

“The White House is worried that your F.O. …is full of pinkos and traitors.”

The Ambassador referred to the Pentagons collection of Russian secrets lifted via NATO from the F.O. Strangely enough, the Buggery Club is after all sorts of secrets, from within the Govt. too.

The P.M’s. secretary, Bernard, denied the F.O. was full of pinkos and traitors, “It’s not. Well, not full.”

The communists were backed by East Yemen, another commie dictatorship, all Soviet backed, rather like the current relationship between the commies of Cuba and those in Venezuela and Bolivia.

The F.O. was extremely upset that the Prime Minister might have been tempted to override sound policy. Indeed, just like the Coalition , the ALP, and the Oz F.O., because of their mercantilist trade dreams, must not `back the wrong side [or ] we will lose the contract. I say, that’s an accurate description of the Oz Cabinet, don’t back Taiwan, don’t even shake the hands of their ambassador lest `we lose’ the China eldorado of a deal of a lifetime.

The Permanent Secretary to the F.O. Minister explains to Sir Humphrey:

“The potential problem with the PM: He might get into one of his ghaslty patriotic Churchillian moods…”

“He must realise that as far as Foreign Affairs are concerned his job is to confine himslef to the hospitality and ceremonial role.”

Well, there is no risk of that from the Howard cabinet, their policy is the same as the Oz F.O’s. policy, which the pinkos and traitors inside the F.O. must find satisfying. So, too, the ALP and Whitlam, though the Coalition policy does not go so far as that which Rudd and Beazely have laid out, supplying the Buggery Club with the latest technolgy which has, militiary applications, their vision is to simply open up Oz as a souped up lolly shop for the Club and Mao’s Red Army. I really coudn’t see a close relationship with the White House surviving should there ever be an ALP Cabinet again.

Indeed, `a general creeping anti-Americanism…in Whitehall ‘, is a bit of a concern Down-Under too, when it comes to bending over for the pleasures of the P.G.B.C.

Sir Humphrey did his best to put the P.M. off the scent, only to succeed in encouraging him. The Oz F.O. pinkos have no such problem.

Here, the P.M. has recorded an exchange with the F.O. Minister’s private secretary, the Oz position on Taiwan and the Buggery Club’s strategic aims for controlling South East Asia, inlcuding Australia , is, oddly enough similar:

`I asked him [Luke]… to tell me why the Americans are so worried about St.George’s. Is it because of the threat of Libyan and Soviet backed guerillas?’

Luke only replies by asserting, the African regimes would be `frightfully miffed if we interfered’.

The P.M. asked, ” Do they like Communist guerillas?”

Luke replied : “They don’t mind them. Most of their governments started as guerillas. It can be argued the guerillas have the support of most of the people of St. George Island.”

“Who argues that?”

The P.M.’s secretary, Bernard, replied, “The Guerillas”.

Curiously enough, Luke pointed out, because of the trade with the African regimes, they should not be upset.That, if there is to be any policy at all then let it be confined to”peaceful co-existence”.

Bernard pointed out to the P.M. , outside of the F.O., only the Kremlin knows the F.O’.s secrets. Well, the Oz Cabinet knows some of the Oz F.O. secrets on China, but that is because they are in complete agreement. Peking, no doubt, has all the Oz F.O. secrets. The above exchange sums up ot only the posiion on Taiwan but, also the `handover of Hong Kong, they having lost their freedoms at the stroke of a pen to the `guerillas’ of the Peking Geriatric Buggery Club.

Hacker learned from the Israeli Ambassador what was really unfolding, the East Yemen commie regime was preparing an invasion of St. George’s Island. That the F.O. would make “strong presentations” but let the Yemenis get on with the invasion, in return the Yemenis promised to give the Brits. contracts. That the Americans, however, would not stand idly by , instead they were readying a carrier fleet to relieve St.George’s.

That sums up the Oz position, all agreed between the F.O., the Coalition, and the ALP, should the Buggery Club invade Taiwan, they will wwring their hands in a show of sympathy, send a `strongly worded protest’ but, otherwise let them get on with the invasion, while the U.S. maintains a fleet handy at the ready.

Fully apprised, Hacker ordered a `goodwill mission ‘ of the paras armed to the teeth to defend St. George’s against the commies. The Yemenis cancelled the invasion. That is the last thing the Oz socialisto Peking Buggery Club huggers wish to contemplate, the last thing they wish to do is upset them by siding with the White House on this and by `goodwill’ armed to the teeth induce the Club to remain in Peking.

Along come two Chinese ex diplomats, one seeking assylum in Oz, and upset `sound China policy’ according to the Coaltion, the ALP and the F.O. The pants down and present rear ends to the Buggery Club are embarrased. Why won’t these diplomat wallahs just go away, they mutter moodily.

Of course, the diplomats have confirmed the obvious, obvious for some decades now. Clinton and Gore, and Kerry, for example, were involved, directly, in handing over U.S. secrets to Peking in return for funds for the Democrat party. Peking didn’t like the election of Dubya over Al Gore, and worse, John Kerry. They are hoping for a Democrat win come the next presidential election. With the tap of secrets turned off by Bush, of course Peking has to concentrate on soft targets like Oz. Oz is soft, with both the Coalition and the ALP and the F.O. busily unzipping the trousers and dropping them for the pleasure of the Geriatric Club.

The Coaliton, the ALP, and the F.O. ,are not facing up to the reality of Peking’s regional ambitions which entails, military aims. They are all content to see Peking continue mounting its threat against Taiwan. The reason, the eldorado, the fools’ mine, the belief, built on the rubbish of mercantilism, China will be an export boom for Oz. The pollies are counting on it, they have to, because the pinko sods, federal, State, and Local, are sending Oz into a recession which, in Victoria, and N.S.W. too this time, will be like the last, a depression. Well, trade with China is not going to save their socialisto backsides on this. We’ll let the gentlemen at Brookesnews explain why the `commie-fascist-bastard-regime’ in Peking is driving the Chinese into the gutters, a bit like Putin. Putin, though, is decidely worse which is, to say the least, is an ugly contrast to contemplate, and one which is not much of a recommendation at all, in view of the habits bestial the Peking Geriatrics Buggery Club freely indulge.

Clinton fuelled Beijing?s militarism,Peter Zhang,
BrookesNews.Com

Chinese economy heading for a recession? Peter Zhang

Australian economy: budget surplus myths meet the ?China Syndrome??, Gerard Jackson

More on how is is being sent down the economic gurglar, once again, by socialistos, all the parties in each tier of govt., Brookes news

In the mean-time, the IRC, by its `wage decision’, has just committed the criminal offences , again, for the umptieth time, of legalised extortion and throwing more bodies onto the growing heaps of the unemployed, “What dear, just some trash, leave it out for the garbos dear’ sums up the higher morality of the “judges” who presided in that court upholding the sway of thug crims of the IR Club . The China policy won’t stop the coming recession/ depression, it is a fool’s hope, and thus, won’t put back onto real pay packets those thrown out onto the heap by the likes of Munro, and the many more to be thrown out with the trash due to the coming recession, thanks to socialisto mobsters called politicians and their armies of stasiland, mendicant, thugs.

Comments (1) to “The China Policy, the Cabinet has Sir Humphreyed itself.”

  1. […] In 2005, I mused on the craven stance of the Coalition, the Department of foreign Affairs and the ALP on China policy. Their stance was, and remains, bend low for a right old rogering from the Peking Geriatric Buggery Club. The China Policy, the Cabinet has Sir Humphreyed itself. […]

Post a Comment
*Required
*Required (Never published)
 

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image