Mangled Thoughts

This sums up things reasonably well:

on Maria Korp
29 June 2005

MARIA Korp will not be resuscitated if her condition deteriorates. The Supreme Court was urged yesterday to give her attacker Tania Lee-Anne Herman hope for the future ? but was told her victim had no future.

The court heard her view of relationships had been distorted by childhood sexual abuse.

Defence barrister Julie Sutherland said that after violent and unsuccessful relationships, Herman longed for a lifelong partner who would protect her when “along came Joe”.

She said her client had lived a blemish-free life, despite the sexual abuse, two failed marriages and a battle with cervical cancer until she met Mr Korp in an internet chat room.

But the prosecutor butted in:

Mr Rapke said while Herman’s co-operation, good record and remorse should be considered, her crime was cold-blooded and callous, and topped the scale of attempted murder cases.

Does, even when true, some trauma of the past vitiate the callousness of a murderer. The only thing in Herman’s favour is as, Rapke, said, her compuntion over what she committed. Good. That someone has suffered violence, might be considered, to the contrary, as motivation to ensure they have nothing to do with those bent on violence and himself not become complicit even just by ading and abetting. `I was subjected to cruelty’ cannot be a defence for violent crime and, in Herman’s case, a pre-meditated crime at that. She will have to face up to what will be dealt out to her.

By way of contrast, the S.S. commander, WWII, Rome, who hunted the American Monsignor, in a cat and mouse game. At the end of the war, they became friends, the S.S. officer repented and became a Christian. the Monsignor, however, told him, he will still have to face up to his past, even if thta means the death sentence, and should accept that as just retribution. He was not given the death penalty, he was given life. The man had so changed in character, the sentence was commuted and released early. That he was released early is not the same as he expected to be, indeed, precisely the point, he expected to be executed and made no complaint against that prospect, just he did not complain about the life sentence.That was a man who, once steeped in blood did not seek an out, and so changed in character that he faced whatever was dealt out to him with decency.He did not, for example, plead, `Well, that was how things were, and I, with many others were swept away by Nazism and that turned me into a killer.’ He offered no special pleading as an attempt to evade justice.

In Oz today, violent criminals are just misunderstood `persons’ who were `abused’ in their childhood and thus, miraculously turned into murderers.

On Sunday’s Faris’ 3 AW panel show, Phil Cleary contradicted himself. Cleary was not as malicious as Jaspan on Woods’ comment, the terrorists are arseholes, but he came out with something no less shocking: `it is important to understand why they are terrorists’, that `they are terrorists because of the persecution of Arab-Muslims in the Middle East, in Palestine, the war against Saddam was illegal’.

So, the nasty West, the Coalition in particular, and Israel, made them the mass murdering totalitarian bastards they are. Despite all the screaming about poor bloody Muslims, one thing stands out: the West and Israel are not noted for that ,`persecuting them’. To the contrary, many in the West would not give a damn about Islam and Muslims if it were not for two pernickety matters: the very large numbers of Islamo-facsists throughout the world, and that most of the terrorism today is committed by muslims, noting the IRA trains Hamas and the other cells in the `Palestinian Territory’.

So, Woods really is a nasty, greedy capitlaist pig. Then a change came over Cleary when he mentioned the murderer of his sister, that the murderer was given a 3 & 1/2 years jail sentence.

The sister was a prrimary school teacher and, one morning, when she turned up and parked outside the school to begin another day in the classroom, the murderer was waiting for her. In broad day-light , he appraoched her as she got of the car and, after chasing her around the car, closd in and stabbed a number of times dead.

The police prosecutor, despite all the evidence, settled on the lesser charge of `manslaughter’. The defence claimed the girl had provoked the murderer, the judge accepted that claim as true and thus the vermin was given, a light sentence. He committed suicide a couple of years later but, as Cleary said, there was no solace, no compensation for justice having not been delivered, and the grief the outrageously inadequate sentence caused his parents, Cleary, properly, demanding the Judge write a letter of his sincerest remorse at having set a vioent criminal scumbag free.

Ceary noted, the murderer already had, by that trial, a long record of violent crime, and that he should have been permanently removed form the streets of Melbourne because he was a violent scumbag.

Good, quite right. The sentence was a shocking miscaariage by the Judge: how on earth could he have contemplated such a low sentence for a cold blooded murderer? How could he have done so and let such a type who also had a long record of violence , entailing that after 3 and a 1/2 years he would have been, if it were not for his suicide, back out on the streets and, in view of his character and form, most likely murder someone else?

More-over, how could the Judge have accepted the defence of `provocation’. How does anyone provoke anyone to commit murder, in this case, a pre-meditated, cold blooded murder. Indeed, what was the bloody police prosecutor on, drugs?, when he accepted the lesser charge when, nothing less than the count of murder was in order, seeking a literal life sentence and, if it were available, the defence penalty.

What does `porvocation’ mean. Contrast, the legitimate acte of self - defence, which must satisfy a number of tests, which are stiff tests. `Provocation’ is not a stiffly tested defence, to the contrary, it is so rubbery that, why violent killers can virtually get off Scott free, to do it again after a brief stay in a hotel which is risibly called a prison for hardened, violent scumbags in Oz.

But what does Cleary have to complain of. He professed, cold-blooded murdering Arab-Islamo -fascist vermin desere sincere empathy, that Woods was wrong, and nasty calling them arseholes. Surely, no less applies to such as the above scumbag. Indeed, the Judge emphathised with the scumbag , `the defendant was provoked’. It would be interesting to read the transcript because, by `provoked’ one infers the Judge did empathise with the killer, something like, `Oh, the young lady was oh so cruel to a complete stranger’, and `tormented him’ and that is why he :

a. Must have been tracking her
b. Must have planned the murder, shown by:
c. He waited for her to arrive for another school day, approached her, weilding a knife and stabbed her dead.

But surely, Cleary must find it in his heart, to empathise with the murderer, as the Judge did, because, that murderer is the same type as those Arab-Islamo-Fascist- Mass Murdering scumbags who kidnapped Woods, and a number of Iraqis, inclusive of those held with Woods, who murdered two of them who had alsobeen employees of Woods, thus to the unutterable grief of those families, along with all else they have murdered before. I don’t empathise at all, with the scumbags, nor do I with the killer of Cleary’s sister.

Cleary’s moral equivalence and eqivocation on the mass murdering totlaitarain bastards in the middle East is puzzling, particulary in view of his first hand experience of just such a type, and Cleary left listeners in no doubt he did not emphathise with that killer too. Equivalence by way of, the scumbags warrant the same regard as, say, someone in genuine misfortune. Equivocation, a crude one, resting, what is the difference between them and the killer of his sister?

Let’s heighten things a bit more. Darren Hinch raised the no less shocking case of a Victorian Judge who having empathised with the killer of a tiny child, he gavce that scumbag a 2 and a 1/2 years prison sentence. The killer of the child was the `boyfriend’ of the mother estranged from the father of the child, whom Hinch interviewed on Monday evening. The Father is still, understandably, distraught, it is distressing just recalling the interview, the poor man, and the murdered child .The Judge empathised with a violent, evil scumbag who is now loose on the streets again, and, in view of that mongrel’s character, it will come as no surprise should one wake up one morning to read the headline, convicted child killer arrsted for another horrifc murder.

Since the rise of the quack sciences, the springs of which are the rot of Rousseau and Descartes’ dualism, and the totalitarain vile garbage of Hobbes and Comtes, the pont of punishment has been redefined as `rehabilitation’. Well, hardened criminals nderstand what that is based on, quackery, and accordingly, do and say what the `rehabiliters’ wish to hear and see, then they are released, having been classified as, `reintegrated into society, into the community, ` restored’ to the whole of Descartes’ lumpenmasse, and then, they go out and do it all over again. In other words, no change in character, unlike the former S.S. officer, just whether they are now `reconsilded with aforementioned tripe.

The point of punishment is retribution against mobsters and by that, to serve as a deterrant. There is no detterant today, and no punishment, which is why violent crime is rising , certainly in Brackistaniland of Victoria, reinforced by the transparent disregard for property rights and (economic liberty), by each tier of govt. ( Govts. , by their actions are stating, violence against others is o.k. mate) .

If Cleary were to ponder the above, he really should utter a mea culpae on the next panel show. For the Islamo -Terrorist -Totalitarain- Mass Mudering- hostage decapitating vermin are just the same. There is nothing to empathise with, nothing to understand, nothing Westerners and Douglas Woods should apologise for nor feel shame over, nor compunction, nor remorse. The West has done nothing to Mulsims except, wipe out those who are terrorists and, truly, few would be bothered by Islam if it were not for Islamo fascism, not only in the middle east, but in the west and muslim terrorists.

The last is another point underscoring why Bracks’ `blasphemy law’ is not only overthrow of rule of common law and, consequently, civility and decency, but also a vicious, malicious, totalitarian ugly, barbaric, savage, joke. Why, the persecution of the two Pastors for saying something some-one dosen’t like including jackasses pretending to be judges, is nothing but the violent action of stasi-land thugs and goons and shits acting as informers to the stasiland goons and thugs - and to Bracks. Bracks, besides resigning for your many crimes as leadah of your Stalinist Junta, when will you write an apology to the Pastors and pay them compensation out of your fortunes made by theft from real taxpayers as a bloody useless stalinist mendicant snivelling politician , you vile, rotten bastard.

Cleary might ponder why, and appreciate why, some find the likes of Jaspan of Mao’s Little Red Age and Liz Jackson, Media Watch and Fat Aunty Bolshevik Collective, vile savages, nasty shits, juvenile delinquents pretending to be adults, fat slobs, in view of their malicious smearing of Woods and their commie admiration of the terrorist scumbags who held him captive, and murdered two of his employees, thus leaving also two families widowed, fatherless, penniless, as well as the many more the scumbags have murdered. cleary might thus ponder also, the many families left bereaved because of those bastards, families who might now be destitute because fmaily men have been murdered by totlaitareain scumbags. Liz Jackson, Fat Aunty Bolshevik Collective, you are nothing but nasty ugly commie sluts, and good old real taxpayers, due to the act of extortion which is called taxation , are forced to keep these lovers of Islamo-Terrorist -Mass Murdering Scumbags - outrageous. Contrast, Fairfax: it is going down the tube because, Farifax is throwing shareholders hard earned at the same types of snivelling commie arseholes such as Jaspan. All responsible for Media Watch should be taken outside and given a caning, literally, with a rattan, the mendacious, lying, malicious little, snivelling, juvenile delinquents, then be be sacked and kicked out into the gutters where they belong.

Yet, the Little Snivelling Lizzies of Oz merely reflect a world in which empathy is reserved for violent, murdering vermin, and never for their victims. Sums up, too, the Bolshevik collectives called the Churches in Australia, who worship three of the Fatthers of Butchers, Rousseau, Marx, Comtes, and damn Christ and Trinity, for they have given up faith for religion and `heaven’ is the full application of commiejhell in Oz. So, with such hypocritical, venal, craven , lying dickheads stuffing parliaments, ABC, Churches , the Benches, the vilification of Woods and the praise and empathy for butchers is nothing less, these days, than sweet reasonableness.