Mangled Thoughts

Powell predicted it anyway, though not in the literal sense manfiested today, `I saw the Tiber flowing with blood’.

John Stone: One nation, one culture

July 22, 2005
SINCE the London bombings several columnists - from Tariq Ali in The Guardian to Phillip Adams in The Australian - have argued that the British brought them on themselves because of Britain’s intervention in Iraq. Well, they’re half right. The British (more precisely, their ineffectual governments) did bring those bombings on themselves.

The Blair Government’s intervention in Iraq is not to blame. Rather, successive British governments have persisted in the multiculturalist folly that a nation can be built on separate but equal cultures. Moreover, under Tony Blair in particular, Britain’s immigration policies and border controls against illegal immigrants have become international jokes, and now a national tragedy.

And the lessons?

Here, then, are six specific proposals for addressing that larger issue.

First, official multiculturalism policies must be abandoned outright. That does not mean we should cease receiving immigrants (albeit more selectively). It does mean all official multiculturalism’s appurtenances (for example: SBS, government grants to ethnically based councils) must be abolished.

Second, we must sharply reduce, indeed virtually halt, Muslim immigrant inflow.

Third, the precious gift of Australian citizenship must be harder to obtain…

Stone throws in support for an I.D. card, irrespective of the fact that, as he also states in the same breath, it will not add anaything to countering terrorists.

Any suggestion selective immigration be exercised is attacked by the usual suspects, inlcuding, in this case, the `multi-cultural police’ whose stupid, little, bureaucratic careerahs are built on this one more socialisto act of fraud. It’s, `discriminatory’, they whine, and rascist. Of course, it is a criminal offence to exercise discrimantory judgement at all, on anything, these days, observing the inherent stupidity of `non-discrimnation’, most, every day, every hour, exercise discrimnation on a myriad of things: This, not that; distinction, above average, pass, fail; which applicant to hire, and whom to entrust with more dmenading charges; that artiste’s work is leftoid garbage whereas, this one is clealry an artist; good movie, bad movie; whom you will allow your children to associate and not associate’, and so on ad infinitum.

The notion that discrimination cannot be exercised on who can be admitted as immigrants and who cannot be admitted as immigration, is garbage. Letting in large numbers whose aim is to impose Sharia `Law’ and `courts’ is, metaphorically, suicidal, and amounts to nothing less than treason committed by polticians and bureaucrats for having done so.

The crux isn’t simply terrorism and terorrists, it is also letting in to the country many who are not at all disposed to living by the very traditions and conventions which make civilised people civilised. Mind, as abundantly demonstrated by the Bracks govt., leftoids are barabrains too but, that misses the point or, not entirely. The politicians and bureaucrats have let in wron-g uns to serve the exapnsion and encoachment of fat god almighty govt. and to build additional voting blocks who are dependant and indebted in some way to fat god almighty socialisto police nanny state govt.

Politicians and bureaucrats and the p.c. police have generated this problem.They cannot use as an excuse to further strip away freedom adavnced only by the common law and not govt. diktat. What they should do is, beg for forgiveness for their malevolent actions and then take the right steps to correct it, beginning with exercising discrimnation against potential migrants.

To clarify, selective immigration is not a euphemism for the White Oz policy revified which was, in any case, a union driven protectionist measure. Chinese,Germans, Japanese, Malays, Italians, Greeks , South Vietnamese, Russians, French fleeing oppressive socialisto France,Hungarians, and a few more besides, have more than merely adjusted. The main of Chinese, Germans, Vietnamese, Italians and Greeks, and Frenchmen are entrepeneurs, and not mendicants, unlike what `immigration’ and `multiculturalism’ includes, bringing unsuitable types and making them dependents on fat socialisto nanny polcie state almighty god govt.

Unlike Oz, residents in an area of Switzerland also have the joy of exerising discrimination against applicants, and hurdles are high. For one thing, there is no `welfare state’. Secondly applicants admitted into Switzerland on the condtion, they are found acceptable and trustworthy. Thirdly, citizenship is granted only after a long period , after residing in Switzerland for a decade or more and that, to re-iterate, is not automatic. The locals, not some bureaucrat, says nay or yay, and it works. The Swiss have no problems with undesirables, they are kicked in if the have been let in.Mor-over, it works on several lines:

The Swiss won’t let anyone receive citizenship if the applicant’s name is Trouble itself, they don’t want ot have wrong-un’s living in their midst. That keeps out criminals and potential criminals.It ensures, migrants are peaceful, law-abiding, enterprising types.

It prevents the emergence of ghettoes of large numbers who cannot adjust, a stark contrast to the case in Oz, U.K., Western Europe, and U.S. Reinforcing this, the ensuing rate of immigration ensures migrants who have to make major adjustments, inclusive of learning the lingua franca can be absorbed on a reasonable basis.

The Swiss position is selective, as outlined above, not rascist. They take in migrants from disparate places, from Africa, Asia, as well as other coutnries. They will not admit in to Switzerland, let alone conceive of granting them citzenship the types successive govts. of Britain, Oz, and US have.

Islam is inimical to what makes civilised life possible, open markets and, liberty served and advanced and upheld by the rule of common law.