Mangled Thoughts

The lady had parked in the carpark of a hotel. Three thugs were lounging about, 2 in the entrance to the hotel, another in the carpark. They grabbed her, punched her in the face, kicked her in the hips, dragged her along the ground and took her backpack.

I’m all for capital punishment. Some murderers certainly deserve the death penalty, not just `terrorists’. Others, like those rotten, vile scumbags a flogging, 50 lashes followed by salt water thrown over the welts.

Socilaism is primitve tribalism and induces only the mores of the savage. Both the major stupid parties are culpable through their socilaisto spiv policies, fromm `Educashon’ to `socvial welfare’ and basically, instilling the belief in savages they are entitled to receinvg private property stolen by bloody govts. and, as enough of them manage to, commit crimes, trot out some dooh dah psycho and, and those other yobs `social workers’ and before ductile judges, whine, `how unfortunate they have been’ and the Judge sits their and sighs, `yes… and I admire you’ ,blows a kiss and bingo, they are out again, breaking into houses, bashing grannies, committing murder.

Indeed, yesterday, a news report on a murder and manslaughter case related:

The accused killled his ex girlfriend who had dumped him. He tried to top himslef and, unfortunately, failed miserably, . He put the body of the girl into the front seat of his car, and raced off and reached 190kph and, slammed into another car, killing the driver .

So what did his character witnesses say, and that is at best all the charlatans are:

He is an insular young man who became clincially depressed ( just lurve that , clinical-lly, after all, the quacks have to pretend chicken gut consulting ruly and truly is medical science) , and put on suicide watch . He was devoted to his girlfirend.

Huh? Doveted is not the same as love and loved. If he had indeed loved her, though she ditched him, he would not have murdered her. If he were civilised, even if he was unhappy ( depressed),he would not have murdered her. If was civilised and not a savage and loved her, he would not even have harboured a grudge against her and would not have entertained any intimatation of murdering her let alon actually doing it. He deserves the death sentence.

The charlatans pretending to be science have only managed to supply specious, at best excuses which amount to nothing more than serve as character witness statements in psuedo-scientific form, much like that fraudulent piece of junk called the lie detector test. The individual is not simply considered not responsible for his actions but a victim of some mysterious force - socialisto blowhards are very fond of that, as their constant bleatings about `alienation’ confirms.

Alienation, they are not civilised cannot be alientated from the civilised world nor alieneated by it.

The savage dropkicks who should be given a bloody hard drop-kick each, that monster of young asshole and those 3 big tough guy scumbags. Just many more reasons why Oz gun laws are bloody stupid: in gun-toting U.S. states violent crime is far, far, lower than in pinko states. So,too Oz, no guns, pinko govts. asshole police commissioners who beleive they can selectively police and judges who real dangerous crims off scott free, effectivley, while decent men and women are taxed, plundered, face jail for breaches of any stasiland law and, after all that, can experience the joys of being bashed and murdered. OZ, a land fit for lying, socialiso dickheads and professional mendicants and their armies of real taxpayer kept mendicants, and scumbags.

Polygraph machines? The Victorian Police force are using them regularly. Well, I suppose , why not: The Stupid Coalition beleives in Magic and chicken gut oracles - man casues global warming and, the chicken gut, those rubbish in - rubbish out `computer models’. So, why not police making use of what, according to even the bloody Coalition is superior to science and reason - magic and chicken gut oracles. The penny should have dropped with those morons by now: if magic and chicken gut oracles are so splendiferous, there should not only be no unsolved crime, they should have crims in prison before they have committed the crime. As for bloody politicians, Federale, Staterses and Local Council Dump Bints, they should be manipulating the weather to make it marvellous all the time and Oz should be, economically, the wealthiest coutnry on earth. No, quite the opposite - the first requisite to being a successful charlatan is, believing in mystical crap and by gum, so many of them do, just ask Lambert and Quiggin, Steve Bracks, Beazely, Howard, the greenies, Senator bloody Campbell, Fat Aunty bolshevik Collective,`they know, man’. Wow but, a puppy vomitting over the carpet has one virtue, the pup is honesty itslef in unabashedly doing, unlike the purveyors of garbage - politicians, pseudo-scientists, bureaucrats and, policemen using bloody telegraph machines - yah, what they all are on about is nothing but vomitting all over the rug with the crap they have swallowed and believe with the belief of the superstitious primitive.( Gad, Campbell, do you really wiish to be a footnote in the greta history book of junk science?! Man, you are mad.)

Botham was once subjected to the same gutter press treatment the Warne’s have endured. Botham fixed the mongrels, has sued them for defamation, won, and that stopped them printing more lies. There is no doubt, there are enough savages out their willing to lay allegations if it is worth it for them to do it. Govts, as in victoria, encourage dirty rats. The Vic EPA actually recurits `informers’ and train them. The mongrels cruise in their cars around Mlebourne in the spare time hoping to spot someone who can be convicted on th emany `criminal charges’ under the EPA `Act’. Kate Moss has been given the treatment. paedohphilia, a vile evile crime as it is, was none-the-less used in witchunt fashion: some rat could be found willing to accuse someone who not only innocent but throughly repelled by it and that was enough for dah medja , poltiicans and goons. Cardinal Pell was just one more victim of the witchsniffers, while in Britain and the U.S. politicians, police and bureaucratic goons wrecked marriages, and worse as they levelled baseless accusations, and resorted to quackery to prosecute their victims, psychology in particular,
`repressed memory regression therapy’ which entailed, real abuse of children as the mongrels fabricated tissues of lies they paraded as `evidence’. Worse, some `judges’ not only allowed that B.S. but ruled against the defence testing the rubbish paraded as evidence and cross examining the charlatans and goons responsible: the course of justice was perverted from beginning to end.

The Warnes have paid for the dirty deeds of low life bastards with their marriage. Put yourself in Simone’s shoes, with nothing more to go on than Shane’s word, and the sheer humiliation of the publicity, with the good of their children at stake too, what else was there to do but separate.

Warne has stated in a press interview, all lies they were. What he should have done then was do a Botham and yet, he still can. Defamation suits will see the credibility of the sluts the gutter press dredged totally destroyed and those papers stiffed for a good whka, indeed, in Warne’s case, a very good whack in view, of for example, not only the damage to his family but, such items as the loss of the Channel 9 contract. Do it, Warne, make them pay and how, do it Warne, don’t sit back, go for the jugular and rip their aesophagus out.

It could not have been easy, particularly when he first stepped out on to the filed for the first test alert to one thing, many patrons, and viewers listeners around the world are saying, there’s slapper man and he recieved a good deal of that from the patrons through the series, and still play as well as he did.

Nine.masn poll:

Will the proposed anti-terrorism laws reduce the terror threat?

Totals so far:

Yes? 7897

No! 21503

In reaction to the new anti-terrorism measures. They are hypocrites.

First off the rank, Steve Brezhnev Bracks, who has railed on the one hand against the measure, in the next breath, declared them to be, unfortunately, necessary, and, in another breath, proclaims how he ensured `checks and balances ‘ were put in place. Compare, however, the Cabinet’s measures to Steve Bracks truly Stalinist Crimes Acts of 2004. Funny, that, the silence of the left, in particular journos and his fan club Fat Aunty Bolshevik Collective. To remind readers, here is the summation of the several `Acts’ Bracks and his bunch of totalitarian bastards rammed though parliament, along with so many others:

The Major Crims Right now are all in the Bracks led Stalinist Govt.

To highlight a couple of the many points against the `Crimes Acts’:

If one turns to clause 1, the purposes of the act, one finds that it says the purposes: ? are to provide a regime ? for the authorisation and oversight of the use of coercive powers .
Not only the lexical selection but the grammar also is chilling in its sweeping force.Mr. Baxter marks: ?Yes, it might sound a strong analogy to refer to Joseph Stalin, but this is the sort of thing that led to his rise’?,and he could have added, and even more accurately, the rise of Hitler and the Nazi Regime.

The govt. can arrest any Victorian, via the agency of police, merely on the strength of asserting any Victorian 16 years old and above has committed a crime, and remove the victim to any police premise in secret and have that victim of this totalitarian bill interrogated in secret.

…the `accused? can be denied any `evidence? which the `chief examiner? may have or not have against the `accused? acquired before secret arrest and secret interrogation, any `evidence? obtained during interrogation, and can be denied a lawyer at the whim of the `chief examiner?. I put `evidence? in the inverted , because no evidence acceptable in common law that satisfies stringent criteria for arrest and charging is required at all. The police and `chief examiner? can concoct any evidence, and a re entirely free, for the only check, a lawyer, can be denied to the `accused?, at whim. By `accused? , you can be as whiter than Mary?s little lamb. The chief examiner is clearly nothing less than a mediaeval inquisitor ?

The victim/accused has more in store:

…refusal to cooperate with the chief examiner will be treated as a contempt of the examiner, with custodial penalties applying until such time as a witness co-operates either by answering questions or by disclosing requested documents
clause 15: Describes the process for issue of a witness summons by the chief examiner if a coercive powers order is in force in
respect of an organised crime offence. The chief examiner may issue a witness summons on his or her own motion or on
the application of a member of the police force. Similar restrictions apply to such a summons as are found in clause 14 ?

It can be added, those innocent of what some Medieval witch sniffer suspects them of stand a high probability of being charged, convicted and sent to prison. The whole process, from, `I suspect x has done..?, to secret arrest, to end of secret interrogation, and all the details of what the bill sets out as the process ensures, not mere accidental miscarriage of justice which in common law occurs infrequently, as rare exception, but violation of justice and due process , skewing any charging and arrest of anyone, to ensure conviction. Innocent Victorians, 16 years and older, are open to it,

The Bill uses `proof? and `prove? in the fallacious sense which will render it extraordinarily difficult even for the innocent to fight, let alone successfully fight, a charge should they fall under the totalitarian hammer of this bill.

No one should entertain any doubt as to the force: Anyone free, under this Act, to exercise those truly Totalitarian secret Police State Powers only has to merely allege some-one has committed a crime. The article which force is,`may have or not have against the `accused?’, ensures that. As I pointed out in the article, once the mere say so has been made, not only is the `accused’ taken form the streets and removed to a secret place for inquisitorial interrogation ( all the leftoids whining about the treatment of the inmates at Gitmo are entirely wrong, instead, it is under the Left socialist party the ALP of Victoria real totalitarian criminal action by the govt. is now `lawful’), and it is a criminal offence to even tell afterward family what was done to them. Be clear about that, unlike the anti-terrorism measures of the Federales, it is a criminal offence, with jail terms attached, to mention it to even one’s own family. To put this in perspective: there is now a mounting list of criminal cases in which the accused has been acquitted because they did not commit the crime.Why, then, were they arrested , in those cases,and charged and tried? Answer: because the investigating police conducted their investigation as also, Prosecutor, Judge and Jury. Under due process of common law, the possibility of not just miscarriage of justice but police getting away with, in fact, perversion of justice has been stopped in each case. Under, the Crimes Acts, 2004, anyone who is free to exercise those totalitarian police state powers is free to pervert justice full stop . Secondly, the Bracks Govt. will, in each case, get its hands on private property. Now, that is the hard substantive force of the Acts of the Bracks Totalitarian Junta. No ifs, no buts, about what can be done not only to criminals but all who are not criminals in Victoria. To continue:

Even without corrupt police, and Opposition members remarked many are not and render fine service, it is the absolute, unfettered police state powers the govt. is about to acquire. In fact, the Govt., once the Bill is enacted, will have overthrown something fundamental: police are servants of the courts and so common law, in matters criminal, using force under grave restrictions and only for the very limited purpose of apprehension, detainment and arraignment of violent criminals before the courts. Police do not have, on that basis, `Power?, neither does the Minister of Police , nor the Attorney General, nor the Premier. Yes, each tier of Govt, has been hard at work in over-throwing these principles and conventions which ensure that that is the case. One classes the ATO , ACCC, other bodies as just that, they have been converted into Totalitarian Secret Police Forces and that is not an exaggeration of the fact they wield Police State Power. It is the case, however, the Bracks Govt. is about to cross the line entirely into an overt, transparent Nazi-Communist Totalitarian Secret Police State Regime. The Police will be nothing less than enforcer for an Absolutist Totalitarian Regime.

Bracks is a lying, totalitarian criminal scumbag. Typical of that lying, professional dole-bludging commie scumbag is this, as Chief Bastard relates:

Brackstopia

VICTORIAN Premier Steve Bracks wants Black Hawk helicopters active over Melbourne, destroyers in Port Phillip Bay and an SAS unit based in the state to beef up security.

And more, besides his medieval blasphemy `law’ and complementary witch-sniffing `court’ HEROC stuffed with stasiland goons pretending to be judges.

Documentation of the Totalitarian aims of the Bracks led State Govt. of Victoria

The Bracks Lead Socialist administration, now only a few short steps from completing the imposition of an outright totalitarian secret police state

Now, I’m opposed to the cabinet’s measures, not because one is soft on Islamo-fascist terrorists whom, anyway, ASIO has identified but have been not removed form the streets, but clearly not for the reasons of the usual leftoid whiners, `Human Rightistos’ and sundry twerps. The joke on them is: Here is Steve Bracks , a leftoid who has rammed down Acts , very many Acts, which are truly totalitarian and what is the response, including from big Mal Fraser, and the wringing wet sookie socialist wombats who have thucked the Liberal Part and turned it into the Stupid Dumbed Down Party fit for Socialist Wankers like Turnball, Costello, Nelson, Campbell and, indeed, rather a lot and also at State Govt. and Local Council Level.

The socialisto dickheads who stuff the Churches as `clerics’ too, not one word have they uttered against Bracks, as opposed to their vociferous denunciations of Kennett, then, Howard. Understandable, their notion of Christian faith is communism divinised, Totalitarianism made thucking Holy. Noting also, Revd. Bronwyn Pike a cleric and a Minstress in the Bracks `Cabinet’ and Steve Bracks is a `faithful Catholic’: All one can say is, what they are committed too, before counting their many economic crimes, is not Christian, it is Anti-Christ devolving into the twin heresy against the creed - the Christian confession, and apostasy from Christian faith. Those two are not Christians, they are liars, totalitarians, criminals, scumbags. They are a tribute to the underlying reality, the Churches are dominated by clerics and laity whose faith is not in Christ and the Blessed Trinity but in nothing less than outright totalitarian police state power matched with brutalising economic autarchy. To illuminate, will put in More below, some articles by Cardinal Pell who is, underneath it all, orthodox , genuinely apostolic and has endured some slings and arrows for it but, off faith, on economics and law, Cardinal Pell outlines what is nothing less than a specious special pleading for Totalitarianism, he believes his prescription will serve the sanctification of Australians - no it won’t , the `Social Welfare State’, and much else besides, is already hard evidence to the contrary - then look at France and Germany. What is of Man, what is of God, are distinct as the scholastics correctly set forth. Yes, Steve Bracks is a credit to the clergy and their yearning for an Ozzie version of the great gulag the USSR ( and Putin’s trimmed down Soviet Russia).

[Will continue to post as one writes passages for this item. Stay tuned.]

Despite his protestations, Bracks supports the measures because he is committed to imposing Totalitarain Secret Police Stae Laws and Un(common)lawful `courts’, over an extensive range of actions. The hypocrisy of the left tells, they fail to call Bracks the equivalent of what they call Howard, Adolf Hitler.

So much for the Lebanese cucumber turned Stalin - his insides rotted.

Beazely, a complete moron, beleives Howard is to reticent about sstrutting the Totalitarian Secret Police State stuff. Beazle Boy would like police to be free to burst into anyone’s home and, in Brack’s mode, seize their chattels as evidence of criminal activity and whisk them away. he always wants the `power’ to `lock down suburbs’ as armies of police swarm all over the place, bursting into homes, and so forth. What has been the reaction of the leftoids? Silence. Beazely’s proposals make those of the Stupid Party look the height of common law restrained measures. Instead, Beazle’s moronic, monstrous desires are reported as the considered judgment of a statesman, and what in the thuck, anyway, is a `statesman’ but an interfering pollie who just lurves to extend the tyrannical reach of Leviathan.

Then, while Bracks wants Port of Melbourne filled with the first Fleet of the Navy - to do what is a real mystery, Beazle still aims to build a whole new bureaucracy and a choco version of the navy, a `coastal customs fleet’. This time around, his excuse for that monstrous scam of a proposal is, to combat terrorism. Unless boats cruise on land, it’s another mystery as to how, robbing real taxpayers of more of their private property to indulge a fleet of sloops so Cap’n Concrete Submarine Cock-up Beazley can play Admiral, that stops land locked terrorists : another complete mystery whose explanation resides in Beazle’s hallucinating noodles he calls a brain - poor bastard, if he were a dog a master would do the decent thing and put him down. Enough of him, he’s not worth too many paragraphs, a complete, around the bend commie bastard is all he is.

Fat Aunty Bolshevik Collective, always insisting it’s news reporting and analysis is not simply better than the commercial stations produce, but, the height of incisive, highbrow insight, and the claim contradicted 24 hours a day every day is stony silent bar a few of its typical commie ga ga skits.

Beazely’s grand scam was mentioned, briefly, on the 7.00 o’clock news, but no details are provided, no doub they can’t face up to, the ALP is worse than the Stupid Coalition Parties:

Anti-terrorism laws do not go far enough: Beazley

The 7.30 Report passed over the measures in silence, not a word. Understandable, they can’t attack Howard and Ruddock over this while Beazley’s notions are worse and a grotesque sort of parody of hwat might be done to take out the terrorists in Oz who have already been identified by A.S.I.O.

Lateline: Well, O’Brien and Moonbat’s No.1 adoring fan, did better. He mentioned the matter but, in the usual dumbed down, trite, manner Fat Aunty passes off as superior, incisive, expert analysis and questioning. Kerry has missed his real day job, a clown in the circus. For what it’s worth, here’s the transcript. Surplise, surplise, toady O’Brien also omitted Beasley’s Totalitarian grand scam.

It doesn’t sit well with Fat Aunty Bolshevik Collective that it’s sugar-daddy, the ALP, is stuffed full, front and back ( Irwin) with crazed, power-hungry commie professional dole-bludging tossers who are showing sound Stalinist credentials - just look at the former ABC slut who is up to her eyeballs in the crimnal malfeasance of the Bracks Junta and their many Truly Stalinist-Nazi Secret Police State `Laws’.

Chief: You will imdediately leave the hotel by taxi for the airport, then, depart the airport in a taxi back to the hotel and return to the hotel, then…’ etc. etc.
Did you get all that, Max?

Smart: Not all of it, Chief.

Chief: What part didn’t you get ,Max?

Smart: The part after, `You will immediately leave.’

A code-words exchange:

Ist Agent: Apples
Reply: MacIntosh

More code-words: The Grateful Dead are alive and living in Beverly Hills.

Reply:

Simon and Garfunkel fell off the Tallahatchie Bridge.

Adams on a show before the Get Smart series:

Faversham [ Don Adams] : You think you’ve got me, but I have you surrounded by the entire mounted 17th Bengal Lancers.
Khan: I don’t believe you.
Faversham: Would you believe the First Bengal Lancers?
Khan: No
Faversham: How about Gunga Din on a donkey?

Some Photos here - the cone of silence always set my teeth on edge. Here’s Seigfried.