The C.I.B. identification photo albums of criminals are fat volumes, can’t recollect how many pages, each page filled with around 15-20 pictures of thugs, many dangerous thugs. One pored over five volumesof them [ 5 other volumes for another case and both sets only a tip of the iceberg of crims on record], as a witness to a crimecommitted by a thug around 18 to early 20’s, Asiatic. I chased the thug who had just done something very nasty to some-one, in an attempt to run him down, but he had a head start, and got away. It was at night , we were returning to the car in a lane in the city, after a jolly good evening. I pored over five volumes of photos of Asiatics, five volumes only out of the total collection at C.I.B., all in their late teens to 30’s. All, the detective remarked, began their criminal careerahs in the early teens and earlier, recruited by hardened, violent criminals. Assuming only 15 or 20 pages each volume, that is 1,125 to 2,000 hardened, violent criminals who all started when they were 11-13 years of age and, younger than that. Only five volumes of hardened, dangerous criminals, crimnals who, if you happen to be in the way, will bash you, at best, or maim you, or murder you. 1,000 to 2,000 men in their late teens to early thirties who became hardened criminals before they had reached the age of 18, were `professional’ dangerous criminals before 18 years of age. Many of those vermin work in the auto-theft and robbery and house - breaking gangs, and, in the drugs trade, , the gangs, some of them at least engaged in all those major crimes, ram-raiding, auto theft, drug running, and have done so since childhood or early adolescence.
The reason criminals and gangs recruit children and teenagers is simple, blunt, ugly: children face no nasty punishment when caught. `Juvenile detention centres ‘ a joke to them, no punishment at all, they mutter the right sounds to charltans who believe they `rehabilitate’ and, consisitent with commification of Oz, `back into the community’. It’s a gas to children and ealry children and, while making the right touchy feely noises the charlatans like to hear, they develop and hone their tricks. Back out on the streets in short thrift, they are ready to engage in worse crimes. By the time they are 18, they are well adjusted to face jail sentences , having adjusted to very early to regarding jail time as just a brief time of rest and recreation which it is for hardened, dangerous criminals, keeping in clear view, they are dangerous before each has reached their 18th birthday as demonstrated by brutal bashings, rape, to murder committed by juveniles as young as 7 and committed even in schoolyards, in broad daylight, in socialisto schools.
It is simply to pin-point why so many criminals are highly dangerous. They have been corrupted entirely in character, in morals, and inured against the grief their actions bring upon their victims from as early as childhood. Many have, in short, been nothing but savage since as early as 5 to 7 years of age.
No one is born bad or good, and every child is capable of learning, quickly, from very early on in their infant years - doting mums and dads tell their infants bed-time tales and fables which carry lessons in morals, all that makes for deceny and civility, and , thus they are no less capable of becoming in short time rotten savages, as 5 year old violent little criminal bastards demonstrate. The rot of rousseau, sociology and psychology has provided a pseudo-scientific excuse for the corruption of children by adults, and not just criminal thug adults: those quack sciences are not only rubbish, they are corrosive and corrupting, child abuse sums up much of the rot dealt out by the mystics who struff the commie departments of education and “teachers’ universities”. Authority of parents is undermined, while their children are subjected to commie bullshit and the upshot is, children play upon that, and some of them become rather open to a life as a dangerous criminal bit of vermin rather quickly. Even decent childdren sneer at their teachers, on buses, in trams, in the schoolyard. They openly express outright contempt for teachers full of the commie socio-psycho bullshit, decent children, so there is no need to ponder what little criminal vermin in schoolyards make of not just teachers who warrant nothing but contempt but all teachers.
The fact that the worst that will be dealt out to little thugs is, `anger management counselling’ and a bit of recreation called suspension’, rather than a caning, and if a courrpting influence permanent expulsion, assures trhe little abstards they can get away with much which shocks not only decent parents but also decent children. Decent children in govt. schools have the misfortune, they are forced to have in their presence little thugs, some of whom definitely develop as nothing but hardened dangerous criminals and others not yet so confirmed none-the-less very open to it.
There are primary school children in Melbourne alone, an age range of 5-10 are directly involved in the drug trade, as couriers, pushers and users, for the reasons set out above, they face no stiff punishments. They are accomplices already to hardened, dangerous criminals. Any Mr. and Mrs. Jones who has a child who is engaged in those criminal activities, or their child was involved but found out and dealt with properly, might refelct, your children are accomplices to murderous vermin who will not hesitate to kill your child, or yourselves, if crossed by your child or, if you have made discovery and act properly on it, yourselves. Children who engage in it, place not only themselves in grave danger, they also place their parents and siblings in grave danger too, as the case involving the Lady illustrates, though not involving children but the real ramifications of the activities of children who become accomplices to in fact dangerous criminals are exactly the same. Parents who have children and teenagers involved in it should not hestitate to contact C.I.B., so that C.I.B. can round them up as swiftly as they can, that is how bloody dangerous it can be, that is the real danger those children put their siblings and parents in, it is not just they themsleves who are in danger, it is their family who could find themsleves on recieving something which contains untold grief the attnetions of vermin you wish you never had visit your doorstep, and there are families around Oz who can enlighten those who are still dubious what that is like, and one has heard first hand accounts so one is not making a general assertion which might be or might not be true, it is true.
To repeat, in re-inforcement of that last statement of whom children who are criminals, marijuana pushers and rings are just as dangerous, no one should entertain any doubt as to that fact, as one has already illustrated and, to add, yesterday evening I had a conversation with a Judge , during which I related this article, quoting even some of my ripest expressions, and the Judge’s response was, ‘Precisely so, no difference at all between them and heroin and cocaine dealers and users’. The Judge, bye the bye, is not one of the soft-cock magistrates who have turned trials and jail into a R.&R. turnstile, and is shocked and disgusted as any man in the street is by itall, and, unlike soft-commie-cocks on the benches, is irritated the judicial hand is tied as far as what punishments can be dealt out to the vermin - and the judge is content to say murderous vermin too , bye the bye. One has reason to more than suspect, if free to do so, the Judge would not hesitate in handing down sentences of flogging and execution to those who fully warrant it, inlcuding the not at all kindly `alternative lifestyle providers’ the vermin in the marijuana side of the business.
Puts drug purchasing and using Michelle Leslie into perpsective. `Her story’ , her defence asserts is the true one and why her conviction wasd falsely delivered: surely, in that case, it was in her interest to have it laid bare in court. No, it wasn’t, she is to relate before an adulatory, commie dominate media press gang. A `story’, well stories are not factual accounts, just as myths are not history such as the story of the `stolen generation’ is not history just a fiction. Fine girl you have, Mr. and Mrs. Leslie, consort to killers, just the sort of daughter any decent mum and dad would be so spiffingly pleased to have, and apparently, a young businessman will be happy to marry and have as the mother of his children - decent chaps drop types like that as fast as flicking of hot ash in the palm of the hand.Mr. and Mrs. leslie, there are gels who had successful boyfriends who, dropped them as soon as they realised, she is not the type to have and raise children with. My betting is, Old man Leslie might already have taken the strop to her backside, unless he has been reduced to a sookie wombat snag filled with the crap of psychology and sociology and so, has a teary, touchy-how are you feeling hurt-feely type session and she, having show all the right teary emotional responses, will promplty go out and do the same but only in Oz, because in Oz, she doesn’t face the sort of penalties dished out to, acutrally, accomplices to murderous criminals which users in fact are. Remember, Mr. and Mrs. Leslie, there are brave undercover detectives , who are not corrupt at all, who risk being murdered in order to bring to book the sort of violent scumbags who deal the drugs your daughter has been purchasing over a number of years and thus is their associate and, like it or not,m she placed your lives in danger as a consquence: and, to add, one considers it a solid suspicion that is why Mrs. Leslie had a stiff fight with Michelle, as reported in Sunday’s Herald as a mention within a paragraph, she had discovered her daughter was buying drugs and using them. A `bootiful soul’ indeed, the only sense it is bootiful is the type boot applied to her backsideoul.
One suspects that that is why the Leslies have been mute all along, as opposed to Michelle, her lawyers and her boyfriend, in sharp contrast to the Corbys and the Ngyuens’. They might be pleased to have their daughter back but that is not the same as being at the same time, angry with her, properly angry with her. A loving, doting parent can be both, except in the eyes of the commiefiers who stuff eachc tier of govt., politican and bureaucrat and psuedo-professor alike who spew out the bilge the tick is to make such types feel valued and overcome their alientation which lead them to do a `wrong thing’ - just as effective would be sticking ice-creams into the gobs of dangerous criminals who, because of her drug purchasing habit, include Michelle Leslie oh yes she is, she has never considered the danger she has exposed any of her family, including the infant neice the leftoid dominated press showed Leslie, friend to dangerous vermin, dandling an infant girl. Nice girl, Leslie, a bootiful soul , oh yes and, wow.
