Mangled Thoughts

Nothing unusual in that, as also of the rest of his cabinet. Paper Doyley produced the goods against the cabinet over the finances for the freewaytollway. Madden, the Minster for Soviet collectivised Sportz in brackistaniland has lied, according to Doyle, over an interest he had when forming a bill written to serve aprticular interest. It is in fact an offence to do as Madden did. The ALP wrote that offence into the statutes at both State and Federal Level. Taking just the finance scandal, Doyley supplied documentary evidence before parliament showing, the Cabinet lied to parliament. It is amusing that the Speaker of the Lower House acted to strike down statments using the forms of the verb to lie and the adjective and the noun, it is obvious why. Striking down the word in all its forms doesn’t detract from, that is exactly what minsters of the Bracks junta have done. The lies they told to parliament regarding the freeway made tollway involve more than the sacking offence of, misleading parliament. Bracks, this week, told another lie, it is far more serious than even the Scoresby lie, it is lie which directly bears upon the bushfires and the horrific scale of them.

A caller on talkback radio, early this week, asked Jo Stalin Bracks the question, roughly, “Does the Govt. encourage clearance on land of fuel?” I suspect the caller lives in the urbs and not in rural Victoria, nor rural anywhere else in Oz for reasons which are plain but to the sheltered.

Bracks replied: “Yes, we do encourage land owners to maintain their land, to clear potential fire fuel.”

That is a lie.

It can be a criminal offence under Local Council, State Govt. and Federal Govt. to do so. The penalities are fines into the tnes of thousands of dollars and, can include orders to restablish the scrub, trees thinned and what-knots that have been cleared in order to eliminate fire hazards. There are property owners in Victoria who have been seeking `permission’, on their own properties mind, to clear hazardous material for the last 11 years. Each year, they have been refused by little tinpot dictators of the following:

Local Councils
National parks
State Parks
EPA - local, state and federal
Department of `Sustainability and Environment
The non -govt. greeny front, the Australian Conservation Foundation but kept out of real taxpayers’ taxed property.

The A.C.F., more-over, has been given to weild, and weild it does, secret police state powers. The A.C.F. is in fact used as a police state goon squad by each tier of govt. The above listed entities weild police state coercive powers.

Those police powers have been decreed by the polticians , all parties to enforce the cult of environmentalism and the acts on which it is enforced contain articles which are nothing but an overthrow of property rights and thus too common law. To this, each of the above have police state `rights ‘ to enter private property.

As a lead in, this example: One landowner has discovered a thin layer of surface material over a number of acres is valuable. He can lift it and sell it.That will have no impact on his own land, and he certainly has no desire to cripple the long term productive capacity of his land. He can’t scrape and sell the material, because the feral animals of the A.C.F., using the police state powers to commit the crime of tresspass, had walked over his land in the search of `native grasses’ and found a some specimens . The onwer cannot now mine the material ,unless he wishes to be thrown into prison.

My view is, the owner made a singular msitake: though it is none of the business of the nasty little dictators who stuff local councils, engaging works an owner must bribe so many bastards - the `permit & licence fees’. Now, if the farmer, before registering the application for the permit umpteenth had scoured the field and, on spotting it, ripped out the obnoxious grass, he would have been on his way.

Bye the bye, my advice to any who have trees posing danger to house and limb, tap into the root and pour in round-up. Neat hole drilled in, sufficient to allow sufficinet of the poison to kill the nasty things, into the roots so that they can be concealed. A council cannot refuse a permit to cut down the trees when the buggers are dead as a dodo. In fact, you won’t need a permit, the tree is bloody dead.

It is not simply, landowners commit a crime when engaging in any works which remioves what the bloody greenies assert to be a wombat species of plant, it is a criminal offence in Victoria now, as in other states, and under local, state and federal totalitarian decrees to cut down and thin out tress and scrub full stop., unless they have been given `permission’ and subject to planting a multiple of the dynamite removed.

How bad is it? The fate of John Howard’s brother is the prospect facing property owners, irrespective of whether rural or urban for that matter. John Howard’s care-taker of a property in N.S.W. wanted a stand of trees and scrub near the care-taker’s residence removed to eliminate in fact two things:

It attracted snakes, and he, understandably, does not wish children to be poisoned by a snake. All the more understandable because, it is a criminal offence to kill snakes which attests the priorities of the greenies and the major parties which have embraced some of the major objectives of Pol Pot’s fan club, sacrifice man to the goddes of death, Mudder Nature. To mark, there has been a population explosion of snakes over the last ten years and is increasing exponentially, the upshot beoing the rotten land lice infest now towns and city in plague numbers.

National Parks `officers’ and the little stalinst bastard of mayor of the pertinent shire showed what they are, demented, rotten land lice. They frothed and foamed at the mouth, dah `mayor’ ranting, roughly `this is preciesly what has to be stopped, we have to make an example of Mr. Howard, to show you can’t do this and get away with it.’

The hypocrisy is blatant. The stalinist bastards are sure punishment is effective deterrance. How can the dipsticks entertain that for what are crimes only by imposing totalitarian edicts and yet assert, of real serious evil crimes, murder and rape, punishment is not a deterrent, with particular attention to capital punishment? It is another insight to what liars socialistos are. In fact, the lie involved is entailed in every other bit of rotten ‘regulation’ each `tier of govt.’ has rammed down,usually on businesses and property owners. On the one hand, deterrance by punishment works, but, for leftoid mush and woo woo causes, it doesn’t. All parties run the contradiction. It is a very strange thing entertaining two completely opposite propositions are both true. Theb condition being, x is true when I say it is true and y is true when I say it is true, right out of the hand-book for jackbooted totalitarians, and is a case of why pragmatism is false and a specious justification of totalitarianism ( epistemology of - those unsure read Russell’s survey of A History of W.Phil. for a quick summary).

[ I’ll continue posting as I complete paragraphs].

It is a criminal offence in Victoria to even remove dead trees, fallen limbs. The greenies via the front the A.C.F. wail, `they are necessary to provide homes’ for nasty little things , everything and anything, land lice, ants, the non-existent spinker-fonkle-gussetted-cretin lizard. Doesn’t matter much of what they wail is not even rare, it is , `save dah animals, save dah bush’ and fuck all who have to bear the burdens of compliance, the property owners.The burdens : financial; lost production capacity; threat of being arraigned on stalinist charges; the danger of devestation by bushfire; the crippling of the ability to work land on a sound basis.’

Yes, all the `laws’ of each tier of govt. are crippling the ability of farmers to work land on a sound basis. To draw this constraint out further: the `laws’ are undermining the very things which those who have imposed them sought to secure. Things which, from the 80’s, property owners were doing volitionally, until the commie bastards stepped in.

The National Party is far detached from those they claim to `represent’, certainly in Victoria. Things changed during the 80’s and that change gathered momentum during the Kennett years, the sheer numbers of farmers who grasped: Farms are not lifestyle wombat holes, they are businesses. With it, they changed how they developed land, including combining forestry, some on a commercial basis. Govt. `legislation’, each `tier’ og govt. is buggering up those developments. Amplifying it is, Beatties pol potian laws, with the upshot, forestry on farmland is not worth the effort. It is worse in N.Z., with commerical forestry plantations also being scrapped. In short, parading their `envirnmental compassionate’ navels in public the bloody politicians have achieved the opposite: why bother wasting funds on forestry, when some police state goon citing decree 9,456,078 , free to commit tresspass, will walk up up to your door and lob against you criminal charges and impose further costs.

More-over, on commons but not govt. forests, clearing sides of roads, for example, of rubbish is a criminal offence. A dangerous tree on the side of road, say a blind bend, too bad. Mr. and Mrs. Jones,with their children can cruise along and crash into it. A tree falls, down, the tree or branch might be moved to the side of the road but cannot be carried away for the wood, and too bad if the Thoimas family happen to run off road and into the obstacle.Better to have the Thomas or Jones family die on the roads than disturb mudder nature. This is just clearing obstacles form roadsides.

Forget clearing scrub and thick canopy which extend those bushfire bombsites, govt. owned parks. it is a criminal offence to clear strectches of scrub and canopy along roads: and this explosive rubbish carries bushfires out of the govt. owned `parks’ out onto properties, killing live-stock and plant and equipment, and into towns destroying assets in towns and much else in between.

Bracks told a damnable lie: property owners, anywhere in Victoria, are not free to maintain their propertoies free of dangerous fuel loads. Not even free to clear bloody nasty gum trees next to a house - the point being, next to fire, gums are prone to dropping branches, gum trees are bloody dangerous.

As for govt. owne dparks, well, as alreay well covered, they are just, in reality, gigantic packs of dynamite awaiting detonation. they should be sold off so they can be commerically worked which thus means, companies can maintain them properly. Right now, govts. and their scams calle,d reserves, parks, conservation parks, they are just rotten criminals.

The downright reality is : the bloody politicians have stripped owners of their property rights, it is unlawful for them to run their land as they see fit. They are not free to eliminate fuel loadings. It is a criminal offence to do so Steve Jo Stalin Bracks you damned fat lying commie spiv bastard. Between your goddamned `forests’ and your other totalitarian decrees, you have turned Victoria into a great outdoor bomb. All the devestating bushfires still raging were generated in govt. forests and spilled out of the forests along `lanes’ of scrub and canopy which has never been cleared because it is a criminal offence.

The bottom line , the pollies, the bureaucrats, National and State Parks,greenies are criminally liable. What they have done is deliberate sacrifice lives and property so that they can worship bloody Mudder Nature. It is deliberate: govt. forests are time bombs. It is no secret.

[Gad, I have to get off the computer, a blister of a lightening storm is moving through.]