The Show trial of the ARS members has brought to a head several things. Already long disgusted with the Bracks appointees Police Commissar Christine Nixon and her paper models of policing, Deputy Commissar Simon Overland and other senior paper shuffling officers sitting on top of them, the police are now mutinous. The Show Trial has drawn attention to the Bracks Junta’s erosion of Common Law, corruption of the courts by stuffing them with trustees, careerists and goons, undermining principles of justice, the substitution of regular courts for witchsniffing Star Chambers.All this, the overthrow of the Rule of Common Law, corruption of the judiciary, overthrow of justice, by the Junta, should have been clear in public when the Junta rammed through its disgusting Blasphemy Bill.
The Churches don’t escape attention either, since it was senior Clergy, of each denomination, which believed Govt., has a right to legislate freedom and common law for a totalitarian measure. Disgusting is the support of the KKR Party for the Blasphemy ‘Act’ and its Star Chamber and KGB type thugs such as Sisely and Szoke. Having alluded to other cases besides Blasphemy Show Trials, one only points out, the shocking persecution of the Two Pastors by the Junta and cretins pretending to be Judges, including the Supreme Court Judge who convicted the Two Pastors, is only the tip of the ice-berg.
Secret trials against Victorians are rather more commonplace than many might imagine. Indeed, the Herald Sun was sued for an article on just one case tried in secret, in which, through its thugs on VCAT and orificers of a govt. department, to use the H.S’s. editor’s words, were ‘deliberately seeking to destroy a family. A very shocking case it is.
Also shocking is the Junta’s actions against X. The Junta’s Kafkaesque notion of the Rule of Law and Justice is worthy of the Soviet Union. Indeed, Kafka’s The Trial was banned in the USSR because trials in the Soviet Union were as Kafka’s fiction. Soviet style trials are conducted in Brackistaniland with far greater frequency than many readers might imagine. Yet, the already shocking record of the Junta will pale before what will happen in the New Year when Bracks Bill of Communist Anti-Rights comes into force. It cannot be repeated too many times, Bracks’ Anti - Bill of Rights is nothing but a legalese excuse to enslave Victorians - that is the reality of the terms of the Anti-Bill of Rights. There will be exemptions, some types, to repeat again, will be free to commit violent crimes. That is set out in unambiguous terms in the Bill of Right. What is proposed here is worse than selective policing, which can be eliminated. It says, certain types of dangerous criminals are untouchable, and are free to commit violent crimes.
So, on the one hand, under the Junta, while law-abiding Victorians face Kafkaesque show trials for no reason at all, some lucky types will, on the other hand, be free to commit murder, stabbing, rapes, bashings. What the Junta is arranging, the overthrow of Common Law and Justice, and substitution of Secret Police State thugs for Judges, is worse than disgusting: it is treason, it is criminal it is treachery, it is usurpation of Co9mmon Law, and Liberty. It is a Triple headed totalitarian Junta of:
Unfettered Executive,
Bureaucrats, who have been promoted precisely because they do share the same contempt for Common Law as the Junta does
Trustees, careerists and thugs who are called ‘judges’.
A further development is the transformation of VCAT under the Anti-Bill of Rights, which I shall set out in a separate item.
It has taken this Show Trial of the ARS members for the penny to drop. Some are very slow n the uptake.
Sen.-Sgt. Mullett of the Vic. Police Association is wrong in not sheeting home OPI and this Show Trial to the Junta. The Bracks ‘’Cabinet” is directly responsible for them, after all it is the junta which set up the OPI and the Star Chambers. Yet, the totalitarian notion of Law and Justice, so evident in this case, is in reality the basis for what the Junta has been aiming at generally.
To illuminate further, let us reprise the essentials of the case of X:
X is elderly. X is retired. X has multiple sclerosis, the only thing wrong with her. X remarried - to Y. X’s daughters, in an attempt to X’s assets, launched an action against X in VCAT to have her declared insane. They have partly succeeded. A VCAT “Judge’ order the “State Trustees Office to seize X’s band and super fund accounts.
During all that, the daughters have defamed Y, who now has to mount a defamation case against the daughters. The daughters, with their girl friends, keeping in view the ‘girls are in their late 20’s and older, assaulted X and Y one evening. The girls one evening, bashed X to the ground, and in doing so compounded an old hip hairline fracture. They frogmarched X to her residence. They seized Y and flung Y down the stairs of the apartment block. If there had not been an object in the stairwell that broke his fall, he could have been maimed gravely injured or killed. Police laid no charges against the ‘girls’!
A goon of the Junta inside the Office of State Trustees, executed the VCAT order, and, seized the accounts, closed them down and now the funds are somewhere in some general account. Furthermore, to add injury to injury, the Junta is charging X an ‘administration fee’ of 6% to 10% per annum.
That’s right, the Bracks’ Junta stole X’s private property, closed down the accounts and, charging her a ‘fee’ on top.
In the meantime, in VCAT’s ‘Courts’, X is required to ‘prove’ that they are not insane.
I outlined the case to a Professor in Law. He was shocked and disgusted. He was also disgusted when I related the failure of David Davis in, first, his duty as an MP to take this case to Parliament. He remarked:
Oh, once the Junta is involved, that’s it, a victim of the Junta has a slim chance of successfully fightuing the case. The slim chance is, going to the expense of hiring a top Silk. He observed, it is all but impossible to fight without engaging a leading QC Keep in view readers, the original reason for setting up VCAT was to provide low cost common law courts, not Stalinist Inquisitorial Show Trials by which to ruin victims of the Junta. (And some readers object to my rather strong language against the Junta. Yes, well, when you see what the Bracks Junta is on about in all its brutal horrors, readers might conclude I’m rather too polite in my selection of adjectives and names for that pack of criminal scumbags. Steve Bracks , a Christian? - bullshit he is, he is a mobster, a crim, a liar and a competely rotten fat little useless professional dolebludging totalitarian thug, ditto the rest of the Junta).
The Sow Trial and its conduct is not, therefore, a-typical of the Junta. A complete overthrow of the Rule of Common Law and Principles of Justice is on show. Let’s cover the essential features.
1. The “OPI” had gathered ‘evidence’ against the, in effect, accused.
2.The OPI didn’t raise criminal charges against the members of the ARS - which is most interesting. It ran a secret Star Chamber trial, euphemistically’ called an inquiry.
3. It then set up this public show trial “inquiry” against them. It is not an ‘inquiry, it is a show trial.
a. - The accuseds are not allowed to cross-examine ‘witnesses’
b.- Hearsay is admitted as evidence.
c. - The accused are assumed to be guilty of crimes, though they have not been charged of crimes, nor tried for crimes, nor convicted of crimes.
d. It is demanded the accused say things which will incriminate themselves, even if falsely. The accused have been told they will be convicted of perjury and given long term jail sentences unless they change their statements.
c. The accused are expected to make self-incriminating statements, which will then be used against them on a criminal trial which will use the ‘Inquiry’ as a core body of evidence basis of the trial
d. Before the Show Trial, counsel for the accused had not been informed of any evidence against their clients, in order to make discovery of exactly what evidence, as well as, it has turned out, criminal allegations against their clients.
e. OPI claims it has gathered evidence against them, indeed presented video tape of a prisoner being given a clip over the ear and being told to cooperate or ‘do it the hard way’. If crimes had been committed, and in possession of evidence, then criminal charges should have been made and sent to a regular court for trial.
Curiously, who the individual is not identified on the tape.
Let’s look at some of these points in closer detail:
i. Mr Berkeley, QC is presiding. He has already told the accused if they do not say what he wants to hear he will have them charged with perjury and write adverse reports against the accused.
Just on the strength of those statements, Berkeley is not impartial and asserting due process. He is biased; he has already convicted the accused. He is merely following the convictions with the formalities of acting as prosecutor and jury. He has deliberately stopped Counsel for the accused to do what they have to do, not represent their clients in an inquiry only, but defend them in a ShowTrial.
Berkeley has threatened counsel for the accused with finding them in contempt of court! Well, it is clear who has contempt for what: It is Berkeley QC who has contempt for the law, justice and Common Law Courts.
ii During the OPI investigation, one of the ARS was promoted. Deputy Commissioner Overland, Nixon’s stick attachment, explained it on radio yesterday thus:
-Promotions are separate and internal to Vic Police. [Wow, not really, golly gosh].
-The evidence, the video had already been obtained, but they promoted the ARS member because, he explained thus (and I carefully recorded it):
“At that stage it was not appropriate nor possible to disclose that information in the course of a promotional situation, and so that process had to run its course.”
Here we have an OPI ‘investigation’, in which its orificers are working to have the accused convicted of crimes, and already in possession of what, as it has turned, its main piece of material evidence. It has ‘witnesses’, the crims in prison that they asked; ‘Do you have any complaints against ARS?’ Senior bureaucrats pretending to be police are fully apprised of these ‘discoveries’ and yet, they promote one of the ARS.
Overland’s excuse is rubbish. Since the evidence, such as it is, had already been collected; the duty was to charge them men formally then. Instead, they promoted one member the squad.
Neither Overland nor Nixon discern why they are no merely wrong, but are in grave breech of their duty as servants of common law courts.
Now, this is very interesting:
“Barrister Sean Cash said the public hearings were a needless repetition of what had already been canvassed in earlier private hearings, suggesting the motive was political.”Nothing new found. So, why weren’t writs issued, if the case had merits as soon as the first inquiry had been completed? Well, it is clear why not: The Junta has decided to circumvent the law and launch a show trial. By using a Soviet type Show Trial, it has clearly decided to convict the accused rightly or wrongly by a disgusting, shocking, and insidious and corrupt measure.In the same article for the last quote:“It’s an unparalleled public humiliation that we as a community should be ashamed and embarrassed of,” he said.Mr Berkeley said it was police bashing suspects that the community should be ashamed. Mr Cash responded: “Then charge him.”After being threatened with expulsion if he didn’t sit down, Mr Cash said: “You’ll gag me, will you?”
Told to “sit down now” Ms Cash said, “I will do that” and slammed down a folder saying: “I’m ashamed to be a lawyer . . . It’s political.”
It is Cash who is right, not Bracks KGB thug, Berkeley.
Now, we have why the police what the heads of Nixon and Overland, other Bracks Junta appointees to roll: they complied with a gross mockery of law and justice against a squad of men, who are not accused of corruption, but dealing a bit of biff out to very dangerous crims. They betrayed men who, unlike those politically correct, ductile, craven careerists, who actually do work in the sort of jobs the police are meant to serve.
They didn’t have the guts to require the men be charged as soon as OPI concluded its ‘investigation’. No, they happily co-operated in putting those men throw a secret Star Chamber interrogation and, now a Show Trial. And, the reason they didn’t have the guts to do it is the reason why the Junta appointed them to the top jobs in the police force, to be faithful good dog rover type servants to the Junta, and not the Rule of Common Law and the Courts regular.
The case has general implications:
It is entirely consistent, as stated above, with the aims of the Junta, to usurp the bastion against tyranny, Common Law, Common Law Courts, the principles of justice of Common Law, the corruption of the judiciary by appointing as ‘judges’ those who are:
Hostile to common law and will serve the Junta’s aims
Those ignorant in Common Law, no grounding in it even if only through practice, as in the case of the latest Bracks’ and Hulls’, appointment to the Supreme Court.
Sacking judges, who are stiff in common-law judges, as was done to a former Chief Magistrate.
Setting up Star Chambers and Witchsniffing Courts run by KBG type thugs pretending to be Judges.
This is what this case is about, because, that is exactly what is on show in it, the high treason of the Junta; it’s usurpation of the Rule of Law. It will get worse in the New Year, when Bracks’ Anti- Bill of Rights comes into force. As it is, it is bad enough:
The disgusting persecution of two decent men, the Two Pastors at the hands of the Junta.
The nightmarish savage treatment of X, with the Bracks stealing X’s private property, and transferring the funds into its own accounts, charging X an ‘admin’ and demanding that X ‘prove themself not insane’ - the consequence will be, and the case thus weighted tremendously against X, is, on the conclusion the Junta seeks, X will lose all their property and be turfed out into the streets.
Yet, there are, on what has been related by others, no a few, but a very disturbing number of Victorians who are Victims of the Junta, who have been put through a qausi-judicial nightmare and as the Junta stripped them off their property rights. Many of these cases are run in secret and it is understandable why: because the Junta wouldn’t survive the public outcry and anger.
I’m not exaggerating; the Bracks Junta are nothing but communist totalitarian thugs. They are lawless, they are criminals, they are liars, they have only one aim, to reduce Victorians to slavery. Oh, yes, Bracks, you are a moron and a fat lying little commie totalitarian bag of shite.