Mangled Thoughts

Introduction

In ‘phase I’, the hostile parties concocted their entire case against Jennifer and Peter. They built up a wallpaper of lies and documents involving extensive perjury to press their aim: to steal Jennifer’s entire private property. Criminal collusion is documented. A wallpaper of lies but it is tissue thin, as readers will proceed to find out in this instalment.

Phase I is crucial to what followed. It is necessary to tie in central actions, and pin them to those responsible. It is complex to lay out, and many details have been omitted to simplify as much as possible. Some omitted facts will be picked up in another item. For now, this puts you in the picture as to what Jennifer and Peter faced and remember, what is related below is nothing compared to what was to come next.

The crimes were perpetrated through institutions, including a bank. How else could they have been perpetrated? Their basis is the Victorian Government, operating through its criminal syndicate the STO and its Stalinist enforcer VCAT.

Names

To observe, the names Peter and Jennifer are pseudonyms. Pseudonyms are used for four of their persecutors. The reason is to protect the identities of Jennifer and Peter; they have been put through enough by scumbags. Otherwise, one would not hesitate to use the real names of those four persecutors.

Jennifer’s offspring, “Gorgon” and “Hecate”. A close friend of the siblings, “Salome”. A relative of Jennifer’s, “Sodom”. All other names are real names.

Background

1. Medical
Only a few details are required, for now. They explain, on what the entire case against Jennifer and Peter was built.

In 2004, with deteriorating eyesight, Jennifer was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. White lesions in the brain occur as a part of aging. Multiple sclerosis, demyelisation of some nerve fibres, is an acceleration of what occurs to everyone as they age; and that is that. A not tight analogy is cancer - rapid cell division.

The ms is mild, and has remained in remission to this day. This has been confirmed in numerous reports, culminating in a stunning CAT Scan report late in 2006.

Because of ms, she has impaired short-term memory. STM is important, for long term memory. It is only mild. There is no impairment of Jennifer’s facility to rationally conduct her affairs, her competence, and general enjoyment of life.

Due to the harassment, Jennifer was occasionally depressed. Her specialists recorded in their reports that it was both mild and entirely due to duress. This is important;the hostile ‘witnesses’ exaggerated it greatly, strengthened by the misuse of the word dementia, which suggests to the man in the street something worse. This was compounded by two hostile experts, who not only did not explain ‘dementia’, but also used an anachronistic, clinically useless expression, which conceals the truth.

Later, Jennifer’s partial blindness would be used against her as further proof of why the STO should have her under their control. It was cited as evidence she was irrational and susceptible to ‘con-men’. Let’s see; everyone who is blind, or ‘clinically blind’, or ,near enough, hands up. Right, you are ga ga and must surrender to the total control of the STO.

All this was admitted as ‘evidence’ against Jennifer. As we shall show later, VCAT excluded sound, thorough expert evidence, and no wonder. Those many reports drew out the deception spun out of the two defective reports the persecutors relied on as their expert medical evidence. An offence was committed in this regard, as related below.

All through the case, until the tables were turned, the hostile lawyers and VCAT members blackened Peter’s name. Their evidence was nothing but the lies spun by Gorgon and Hecate and their intimate friends, as we shall unload with the documents below.

Family.

In 2004, she met Peter. They fell in love; it was “serious”.

Suspecting they’d married, and they did in 2005, Gorgon and Hecate began a campaign to force a separation by blackening Peter’s name to anyone who’d listen, including staff at Jennifer’s local bank. They depicted Peter as an arch criminal, out to strip Jennifer of all her property. They depicted Jennifer as insane, and thus incapable of realising the danger she was in.

They assaulted Jennifer, with another close friend of theirs cheering from the sidelines. They assaulted Peter with Salome cheering from the sidelines.

Still, they had no lever to achieve their goal, seize Jennifer’s property, until their malevolent campaign came to a head in October. Then, someone pointed out to them a way to have Jennifer declared in reality insane, non-compentis, and have her declared in financial danger from Peter.

The case is launched

On that ‘advice’, on the evening of the 27th of October 2005, Gorgon contacted CATT, which is an ambulance based psychiatric unit, ” Crisis Assessment Team Triage” which sends out units of psychiatric nurses in emergency cases. Gorgon spun lies about Jennifer and added a few more. CATT telephoned Peter and Jennifer, and after a brief chat, was satisfied it was a false alarm.

Jennifer and Peter called the police that evening. The reason was to put a final stop to the long running, brutal harassment from Gorgon and Hecate. That should have been the end of the matter. It wasn’t.

A vicious CATT nurse, a Mr. Rooney, suggested to Gorgon that to obtain what they sought they could obtain a VCAT issued, “Guardianship Order, and how to do it. It wasn’t to be had by ringing up CATT. It was to be had through the STO and VCAT. They only needed the ‘right’ lawyers and, as we shall see, they were at hand.

The STO can exercise one of these only under court orders: Temporary Administration Order; Administrative Order; Guardianship Order. (1) Application must be made to VCAT, with sworn affidavits, grounds, witnesses, and representation by a barrister for the applicant(s).

Document A: Application for Temporary Administration Order to VCAT, with covering letter and sworn affidavit.

1.Covering letter

Letterhead of the firm, McDonald, Slater and Lay. Dated, 28/10/05.Addressed to The Registrar, Guardian Section, VCAT.

To quote the main statements:

“We refer to the telephone conversation with Registrar and John Waldsley of Counsel this afternoon.

[We ask for] “an urgent Order appointing a temporary administrator of Jennifer be made as a matter of emergency.”

“Our Client, has instructed us that he gives his undertaking as to damages that may flow as a consequence of this order.”

We have an agreement with the Bendigo Bank not to release funds (to Jennifer) until 5.00p.m today”

(I draw attention to the last two statements, the force of which is set out below)

2. The Application Form

Applications to the Guardianship list of VCAT must include informing the targeted individual. Copies must have been sent to the defendant. There is an exception, ‘urgent cases’, and this case was not at all urgent, did not warrant any such action at all. No copy was sent to Jennifer. The hostile parties of their actions did not inform her in any way against her. It was all initiated in secrecy – maintained by VCAT until Jennifer accidentally found out what the scumbags were doing to her.

The name listed on the application as the “Applicant” and signed by the “Applicant” is Mr. Waldsley! It is beyond question that is unlawful. Waldsley broke the law in doing even that one thing, falsely affixing his signature in the place of the real Applicant.

In the entry for cause, no cause is given. Dementia is stated but that is no cause at all, as we explained in the background brief.

Medical evidence has to be stated and enclosed as an attachment in applications as evidence. They had none and so they made a medical report up, a non-existent report: “Subject to medical report.” That is against the law. It is an offence.

For next of kin, several lies were written into the records:

Gorgon is entered as the next of kin in Australia. Gorgon’s address is outside Australia. Gorgon gave a false address; it is the address of sibling Hecate. Neither is Hecate next of kin. Peter, as Jennifer’s husband is next of kin.

The Application requires statement of “issues to be determined” in a hearing. That is, the case must be stated. What was written? This:

“As determined by the Tribune.”

No, “issues”, no “case” but, in the application, they told the tribune ‘you can cook one up for us’, and that is what that does mean. Contrast a fictional equivalent:

Police rock up to your doorstep, arrest you and haul you before a judge. They say to the Judge ‘M’Lord, we request that you invent any criminal charges you care to contemplate and convict the prisoner’. He replies, ‘Before I do this, do you have any evidence to help me?’ “No, we’d just like you to convict the felon.’ “OK, I’ll convict the prisoner of murder, armed robbery and rape, and tax him 60 years prison.”

Well, that was what was done to Jennifer.

3.Attachment, Short form of Affidavit

The affidavit is the sworn statement of Sodom. Due to a number of details that could identify the victims, one shall confine quotation to a few telling statements:

Sodom falsely swore that he had been in “regular contact with Jennifer for the last 15 or so years”. That he knows her symptoms, “ they are severe”. That Jennifer told him he was “disturbed” about Peter (this is allusion to the slander Peter had criminal intention to embezzle Jennifer’s funds). They are all falsehoods, and those falsehoods were invented by Gorgon and Hecate. Jennifer’s contact with Sodom was, at most, one telephone call a year. There is good reason why Jennifer has had nothing to do at all with that scumbag, and refuses to have anything to do with Sodom.

Summing up the Document

The application is unlawful, and the solicitors and barrister in preparing the application broke the law. Those offences are compounded by extensive perjury by parties to the document. Isn’t it also perjury for Wadlsey to have entered himself as the “Applicant” ?

The law was broken again by not advising Jennifer of the application and supplying her the documentation. Yet, McDonald Slater and Lay had the time to contact and gather together Waldsley, Gorgon, Hecate and Sodom, contact VCAT and arrange a hearing ex parte.

Giving the game away totally is that odd ‘let off clause’ in the covering letter. Notice also, there is the assumption of safety in Sodom signing off on the perjuries committed. Who would go after Sodom who lives far away outside Victoria?

What else? Well, having Sodom as the witness of the affidavit protects not only the real ‘Applicant’, Gorgon. It conceals the relations between Gorgon, Hecate and Salome. Salome is the daughter of one of the solicitors of the firm “McDonald Slater and Lay”. Try it:

In a regular court, the application would not simply have been thrown out as vexatious. Parties who attempt before a regular Judge what that lot did would swiftly find themselves on the wrong end of hard cross-examination. This is before charges of perjury in order to injure an innocent party and defraud them of their property are raised.

VCAT is different. VCAT is a Stalinist Show Trial circus. VCAT did not agree to what was sought on the 28th. Not because the application was unlawful, and not because statements needed to be tested for truthfulness. No, they wanted a “medical report’. In other words, it was OK to submit an unlawful application, and one that contained lies in the form itself and extended perjury in the Affidavit.

As indicated above, VCAT isn’t concerned whether a medical report is defective. All they want is a ‘legal excuse’ to help out their pals in crime in the STO and the law firms who surround them, aid them, abet them, and get rich quick by stripping victims of their private property.

Waldsley, perhaps without realising - (casualness showing out) has only supplied evidence of a criminal act,”We have an agreement with the Bendigo Bank not to release funds (to Jennifer) until 5.00p.m …” It is all the more explosive as evidence in the light of what is related below.

30/10/05 Wadsley submits a perjured document to VCAT

Document from Mr. Waldsley to VCAT, 30/10/05:

: I confirm that I am briefed on behalf of Mr. [Sodom] …

This refers to the lie concocted by Gorgon and Hecate, to paint Peter a criminal. The claim is Peter was already embezzling Jennifer. Original balances, they asserted were three times the real modest sum Jennifer had in savings.

The crucial evidence, account books (and the first will) were stolen from Jennifer’s home, on the 25/10/05 and the only one who could have done that was Gorgon.

Gorgon denied it throughout. To establish the truth of the funds then held, and that Peter was not embezzling, they had to wait the best part of two years to obtain evidence of the truth and, ironically, from STO. Here’s the punchline:

When the case was over, a Mr. Beresford Smith, who is in the office of the OPA, returned the stolen documents to Jennifer. The only way he could have obtained them, unless he committed the crimes of breaking and entering and stealing, was through McDonald, Slater and Lay, or Waldsley, or directly from either Gorgon or Hecate, or in the presence of all of them.

We have more to say on that bastard called Beresford Smith of the OPA later.

Criminal Collusion, VCAT fully apprised of it and accepts it. Bendigo Bank. Document 2

Without a temporary administrative Order, the firm McDonald, Slater and Lay nonetheless attempted on the 28th of October to initiate seizure of Jennifer’s accounts by requesting of the Bendigo bank the ‘stop’ them. They contacted a Mr. Neunhoffer, Corporate Solicitor Group Legal, Bendigo Bank.

Mr. Neunhoffer asked for delivery of the Order before execution, for the very good reason that it is against the law to freeze accounts without Orders, and notarising them. They replied that they have them. They assured Neunhoffer they would be sent directly, so would he freeze the accounts?

The Bank, by its senior legal officer broke the law. They froze the accounts without having seen an Order, let alone notarise an order. On the 31st, Neunhoffer wrote to McDonald Slater and Lay, on Bendigo Bank’s Letterhead:

” I refer to our conversation of the 28th, 2005 at 5.20 p.m. and the Bank’s willingness to continue the stops’ on Jennifer’s accounts pending the …VCAT Guardianship Order application set down to be heard first thing this morning.

Please note that unless the Bank receives a VCAT Guardianship order or other Court Order today, the stops…will be lifted at 5.00 p.m. today and Jennifer will be allowed to transact her accounts as she sees fit.

In the absence of one of the above mentioned orders, the Bank is unable to assist you further.”

The letter shows they lied to Bendigo Bank in saying they had an order, and would send it asap. Yet, the bank committed a criminal offence in agreeing to that action against Jennifer and her private property

On the 31st, in a hearing VCAT denied the application - on the count of lack of a medical report and not because the application was unlawful. Thus, VCAT gave the hostile parties an out. VCAT ordered a hearing for the 2nd of November 2005, so McDonald Slater and Lay could come up with a ‘medical report’.

Remember that the Application contained not mere irregularities. It is unlawful. That it also contained an Affidavit that is unbroken perjury. The real applicant, Gorgon, is concealed.

The covering letter stated: “We have an agreement with the Bendigo Bank not to release funds (to Jennifer) until 5.00p.m today… VCAT was thus fully apprised McDonald Slater and Lay, and the Bendigo Bank had arranged an unlawful agreement against Jennifer. VCAT was fully apprised of a criminal action arranged by that firm of solicitors and Bendigo Bank.

On the 31st, VCAT handed down an “administrative guardianship order”.

Bendigo Bank broke the law on the 28th, and continued to break the law until 5.00pm of the 31st.

Neunhoffer did not advise Jennifer before reversal of the stop that he would reverse it. Jennifer was not to find ut that she could have quickly shifted some of her accounts before it was too late.

STO gets its claws on private property.

On the 2/11/05, the VCAT “hearing” was held and concluded with the issuing of this order:

Headed under Guardianship and Administration ACT 1986, Section 19, guardianship act, and section 43 administration act;
‘The Tribunal is satisfied the represented person has a disability – that person needs an administrative guardianship order’.

They ordered the ‘standard fees’ be charged against Jennifer:

“…that the State Trustees Offices be paid:
“commission” on (Jennifer’s) gross income at
“3.3.% of pensions
6.6% on all other income.
1.1% per annum on administered funds
4.4% once only commission on capital assets”

If companies tried to charge those “commissions”, their customers would go on the warpath. Those charges, ‘legislated’ alone are nothing but larceny. Larceny committed by the Victorian Govt., with the full approval of politicians.

What must be noted, those “commissions’ do not include all other fees and charges STO exacts against its victims. STO is also an ‘insurance company’ and ‘tax agent’ to the ATO Thus, it charges GST and collects fee and charges on supplying ‘tax advice’ to its victims, and hitting them with taxes.

The above charges are only the beginning of the ‘gravy train’. Neither do they include real funds they siphon out of victims’ accounts. Neither do they include false charge entries to victims’ accounts. All these items will be documented in due course, as we lay out this case.

The firm delivered the VCAT order to Bendigo Bank, which ‘legally’ “stopped Jennifer’s accounts. The State Trustees was now in control of Jennifer’s savings, her cash accounts, and, her house.

The STO entered the victim’s home on its books as a capital asset. The 4.4% commission on capital has a use, besides stealing more of their victims’ property. It is the means by why they put a Queen’s caveat over the homes of victims, as they did in this case.

Treating someone’s home as ‘capital’ is one of the instruments by which the STO seizes homes, confiscates, in fact title, and, as it has done, sells those homes and boots the rightful owners out onto the streets, or, effectively, incarcerates them in ‘homes’. We will, in a later item, relate a case, which illuminates the sheer criminality and brutality of the STO, and the Victorian State Government.

Criminal Collusion- VCAT Lawyers and STO

Documents, which were extracted much later, in the last months of 2006, demonstrate a scheme of arrangement was devised.

The fees of McDonald, Slater and Lay were ordered to be charged against Jennifer’s accounts. After the best part of 2 years, Jennifer managed to obtain ‘account statements’ from the STO.

Account statements in inverted commas because they are worse than inadequate. There, are for example, dates, and contradictions in dating of items, which points to only one thing, “fiddling of books”. The statements are incomplete. Explanations are trivial.

One item in one of the statements is for legal fees paid.

In the covering letter, it is explained the legal fees were paid to the hostile lawyers. Notice: Jennifer and Peter paid their own legal and expert witness fees (though it was a struggle), not the STO.

The STO refused her many requests for increase in the allowance they doled out to her from her own means. Her requests were to meet the costs of mounting and running her case. VCAT went on to increase their costs, while they tried to starve Jennifer into submission.

While denying Jennifer the funds to run her own case, it was arranged between the STO and the hostile parties, and agreed before VCAT that the fees of the hostile lawyers would be extracted from Jennifer’s funds. Documents obtained in 2006 show the collusion between the parties in greater detail, but they are for later items.

They agreed to steal funds from Jennifer to pay part of the fees of hostile lawyers. It is larceny.

Ah,the Federal Government is party to the larceny of the Victorian Government through its crime syndicate the STO ; as it is a Federal ‘tax agent’. Yes it is. They are committing criminal offences, offences of receiving.

Conclusion

What we have outlined is how the Victorian Government, through STO, VCAT, and aligned lawyers, targets individuals, hauls them in, and then steals their property.

This is what they did to Jennifer. They had not expected Jennifer to fight back, nor that an archive be built to document their very serious crimes.

I haven’t captured all that went on in this article, and a followup is probably in order. For now, it establishes the basic lines that triggered what followed.

Already, serious offences have been committed. Before the tables are turned, Jennifer and Peter were subjected to increasingly worse abuse.

Yet, what is already outlined, and what is to follow, is not atypical: it is what the government runs on a large scale against many Victorians. There are victims who have endured even greater brutality at the hands of the Government and its agents the STO and VCAT. Remember this, as you read these articles on the case.