Mangled Thoughts

Yesterday, I promised an explosive document. There are two of them. The two documents are direct evidence of an attempt by the OPA to pervert the course of justice. It has committed two counts of what are major criminal offences. I now warn the OPA, any attempt to interfere with evidence, internal and external, external evidence, and witnesses, are, obviously criminal offences, serious criminal offences, as are the two counts I relate now.

The Attorney General, and through him, Premier and Cabinet are responsible for the OPA, as well as STO and VCAT. The Cabinet is running a crime syndicate, which commits serious crimes. The two counts named above are not the only crimes committed in the case of Jennifer and Peter. Those other crimes, some already laid out, while others will be laid out with direct documentary evidence.

The criminal actions were committed late in the case, in during one of the final phases in 2007 (there are matters that still have to be fought. Thus, the case has run from October/2005 to, to date, January 2008). The tide turned in 2007. The crimes were committed in 2007. In view of the serious offences named above, we leap forward by over a year of actions in the case.

The crimes were committed when Peter and Jennifer, with their barrister, began turning the tables on the STO, OPA, and VCAT. This was entirely due to Peter’s meticulous collection of evidence and related documents. The archives, as far as I am aware, are the only collection preserved in such cases. This is what makes this case a precedent: the only collection of hard fought for documents demonstrating the crimes the Victorian Government commits against its victims through its agents.

As we indicated yesterday, the OPA is directly involved in those core crimes, through its institutional ties to STO and VCAT. We noted yesterday the OPA has widened ‘catch-all’ excuses by which Victorians can be placed under the total control of the Government, and by which the Government, through its agents, proceeds to steal victims’ property.

As the tide turned, both STO and OPA tried desperately to retain their unlawful, criminal control over Jennifer and her property. Presented with a massive body of evidence demonstrating the Order over Jennifer, of the large scale theft of funds committed by the STO, and other serious matters, VCAT began extracting itself from the case, covering its backside. After all, VCAT is the ‘legal’ device which the Government protects its crime syndicate STO-OPA. This is when the OPA attempted to suborn and influence an expert witness and a VCAT ‘member’ (VCAT’s name for judge – and they are an insult to the name judge)

The 2 documents were obtained under the ‘Freedom of Information Act’.

Document number 1

Jennifer made an application for a “Reassessment Hearing” in 2007, based on new evidence, and the true claims that essential evidence she and Peter had submitted in past hearings were ignored by VCAT members and other abuses that damaged them. Other grounds included, STO stealing from her funds, and both STO and OPA had broken the Act of parliament regarding their duties to Jennifer. That also the hostile case was built on the lies told by Gorgon and Hecate. That Doctors’ reports showed the excuses for the Government’s actions, through STO, VCAT, and OPA to be false.

The hearing was slated for 22/1/07. It was altered by VCAT to a ‘directions hearing’, as preparation for the now deferred reassessment hearing. The reason was the OPA, through its officer Beresford-Smith, said they were not ready for the hearing. The evidence Jennifer described in her application had completely caught the OPA by surprise.

Beresford Smith demanded Jennifer submit a new medical report from a specified Doctor, and conditions under which she must obtain it – e.g. her husband was not to be present.

The presiding ‘senior member’, Carruthers, adjourned the reassessment hearing for a period of up to 2 months. It was subsequently slated for the 27/3/07.

On the 23rd of January, Beresford-Smith wrote to that Doctor.

The letter is on OPA letterhead and therefore it is an official OPA document. The substance of the letter is direction of the Doctor, and reflection on Jennifer and Peter. The force is obvious form the contents.

1. To make the Doctor bias the report against Jennifer, in order to:
2. To render the findings such that the ‘claims of the government through the OPA and STO would be upheld.

It is not merely an attempt to influence the expert witness, which itslef is perversion of the course of justice. The content is direction of the Doctor.

Four serious crimes at the least are involved: perverting the course of justice; interfering with a witness; attempting to corrupt a Doctor by trying to make them write a falsified medical report; to make the Doctor breach duty to the subject and their professional obligations, which would have meant, if agreeable, the Doctor committing professional offences, and party to perverting the course of jsutice.

The OPA’s effort, however, failed. The Doctor did not waver. The report shocked the OPA and STO; it was not what they wanted. The Doctor had reported on Jennifer in the past. The findings, several of them, showed the STO-OPA claims were false. The Doctor remained unimpeachably consistent. I will relate these documents later, and also the supporting action of the Doctor. The Doctor was not for the corrupting.

Document No. 2

The 27th of March/2007 was slated for the ‘Assessment Hearing’, set for the afternoon.

On the morning of the 27th of March, Michael Beresford-Smith, and OPA, sent a ‘memo’ addressed to the Registrar of VCAT. The memo was written by Beresford – Smith. He refers throughout the document to himself as ‘the author’. The ‘memo’ is printed on OPA official report form.

The reason it was called a ‘memo’ and not a report, as it should have been ( not that that negates one jot the charge of perverting the course of Justice), was Beresford-Smith and the OPA wanted it kept secret, as the cover sheet shows:

Confidential – for Tribunal only
Memorandum

To Register – Guardian List ( that is, it was sent for the hearing presiding senior member, Carruthers)

From Michael Beresford Smith OPA.

Topic Re-assessment of Administrative Order of 27/3/07

In the session of the afternoon, this exchange occurred:

Beresford- Smith: ‘Did you receive my memo?”
Carruthers: “Yes, I did.”

Contents:

1. Smears Jennifer’s barrister.

2. Repeats the lies told against Peter, the lies first spun by Gorgon and Hecate as related in, under the section headed. He includes the lie Peter had embezzled a large percentage of Jennifer’s funds. He adds to the lies by smearing Peter further. By this, he is painting a picture of Peter as a cold, calculating conman who has Jennifer under his control as puppet master to a puppet.

3. He lies about the reason for the adjournment of a past hearing, falsely blaming the defence barrister by telling a lie and smearing the barrister.

4. He relates he has written to the above Doctor on the 23rd of January/07, and also that he has contacted the Doctor by telephone a number of times. He makes claims about (if the calls were held as he claims - possible perjury) what the Doctor said.

He claims the Doctor held some of the concerns the OPA has about Peter and Jennifer. That is a lie, as the Doctor’s reports show and as the Doctor’s later evidence shows.

5. He distorts ‘dementia’, and adds in the nonsense of cognition, reflecting on Jennifer’s ‘cognitive’ capacity to manage her own affairs.

Why, only yesterday I wrote on the OPA’s neo-Marxist corruption of language. In that memo, the OPA uses the same tripe. As for Jennifer’s capacity to run her own affairs, later I shall quote from a documents; their force damns the OPA and the STO and pas VCAT hearings.

[To reinforce what I wrote yesterday: Everyone over the age of 30 incurs ‘dementia’, it is due to aging. While the term dementia is inadequate and should be thrown out as inadmissible in courts as a term. Doctors in their reports constrict the usage to a truthful, thus sound usage: a physical fact of the brain, due to aging, memory diminishes, everyone therefore incurs dementia. Dementia is regular; it is normal of all. According to the OPA and STO and VCAT and the Victorian Government, every Victorian over the age of 30 should be incarcerated in the Gulag STO-OPA-VCAT and have their property stolen by the Government.]

6. He uses another corrupt and perverse notion of the OPA’s against Jennifer – ‘emotionally vulnerable’.

7. He asserts the OPA’s neo-Marxist lie that Jennifer is at further risk because of isolation from ‘social networks’. Those networks he refers to are government collectivist schemes. Jennifer is not ‘isolated’, and never has been; she has her own life, her own friends, her own interests. According to the OPA, that pales before the ‘uber dream’ world of neo-Marxism.

8. Another abuse of language, in the conclusions drawn in the memo;

“the protective nature of the jurisdiction”

He explains that it will be breached if the Order over Jennifer is rescinded. (That is not the nominal force of the Act, though it is the practical consequence of the Act and its administration.)

9.There are more lies, exaggerations and fabrications told in the memo, but for now, we proceed to the conclusions drawn in the memo.

10. Conclusions reached in the memo: (surprise, surprise) VCAT should retain the administrative order over her affairs.

Comments

1. No wonder OPA labelled it a memo and not a report, reinforced by further confirmation of the 1 instance of perverting the course of justice, interfering with a witness, the Doctor, and trying to suborn the Doctor.

2. The document was written for the listed presiding member for the hearing in the afternoon session of VCAT.

3. I will relate in fuller detail the contents of the documents, it’s a very good read, OPA and Beresford –Smith, it is very illuminating, of major crimes committed by the OPA. There it is, the contents were intended to pervert the course of justice and in the ways stated of the attempt against the Doctor:

a. To direct Senior Member Carruthers what her ruling should be that afternoon.

b. To ensure the ‘right ruling’ supply her with ‘evidence’

c. To instruct her how to either ‘interpret’ evidence, rather than soundly let conclusions follow from the evidence; or by ignoring evidence supplied by the defence; or by selective usage of defence evidence.

d. To prejudice Carruthers against Jennifer, her husband Peter, and her barrister.

4. This document is an extensive demonstration of the crime of perversion of justice.

5.The OPA has also broken the the Act covering guardianhsip.

As we related in Phase 1, though in October 2005 a temporary administrative – financial order was sought against Jennifer, a Guardianship administrative was imposed by VCAT in November 2005. That Order, however, was, after a hard fight, mid 2006, and replaced with successive administrative order, as we shall relate.

In other words, after the reversal of Guardianship, the OPA, as an enforcer of Guardianship, in tandem with STO, had no standing. The OPA and Beresford Smith lied to VCAT in 2007 when they asserted they had an ‘interest’ in thecae, and thus must be represented.

Oh, they did have an interest, a joint one with STO: their joint interest was to keep Jennifer under their control – to continue controlling her and stealing her property, inclusive of her freedom of action… This is what OPA and Beresford Smith were fighting for.

They broke the ‘law’. Under the act, they are required to serve subjects by complying with their wishes and statement of interests and the actions they require be taken. OPA broke the law on those counts and compounded those criminal offences by in fact deliberately siding with the hostile parties and running their hostile case as the OPA case “in the interest” of Jennifer. These, as will be related, are also criminal offences committed by STO.

On the other hand, the ACT makes OPA an enforcer of Guardianship Orders. That also means its interests are bound up with the STO. Both are protected by VCAT. This is the crime syndicate set up by the Victorian Government, reinforced by a wall of ‘lawyers’ and co-operating law firms such as McDonald Slater and Lay.

6. OPA has a third count of perverting the course of justice, the fact that they used as their cover the lies told by the instigators of the vicious actions against Jennifer and Peter, and used those lies against them, and thus directly, supported the STO in its criminal acts against Jennifer. Until the reversal in VCAT, the OPA, and its officer Beresford Smith worked all the way through the case closely with the hostile parties, and promoted the hostile parties’ actions against Jennifer, before VCAT.

Conclusion

VCAT is the Governments’ cover and final enforcer of the crime syndicate. Faced with a mountain of evidence against it, however, VCAT began extracting itslef from what they appreciated: The whole rotten action was exposed, and about to blow up in their faces.

I charge the CIB Victoria Police, and the DPP to take criminal proceedings against OPA and Beresford Smith for perversion of justice.

We could expand with more statements of offences committed by the OPA in this case. Immediately, however, I have just laid out two very serious crimes committed by the OPA, and the direct evidence proving that is what they did:

They acted to pervert the course of justice. They failed ion the attempt, but that is what they deliberately did.

I charge the CIB of Victoria Police, and the DPP to take criminal proceedings against OPA and Beresford Smith for perversion of jsutice. Failure to do so would be a direct perversion of justice. The CIB and DPP would be culpable of the serious criminal offence themselves of perverting the course of justice.

I warn Vic Police, I warn the DPP, failure to do so also entails crime, turning on corruption - to protect the Government, who are responsible for all this sorry mess; the Attorney General, Cabinet and Premier. Any attempt to bury the case, and all other actions, and cover the Government would be major crimes.

Let it be known the Government has committed major crimes through its agents, as set out in this item.