Mangled Thoughts

Humphreys took exception to my article; “Centre of Independent Studies and the Institute of Public Affairs are covering for ‘alternative energy’ scams”. His feelings are hurt, as he explains. In explaining this, he avoids altogether answering substantive matters. On another site he whines, and deliberately told a number of lies. Humphreys is a liar. Well that makes sense, since the CIS is committed to the lie of man causes ‘climate change’ and to the massive fraud of carbon taxes.

Humphreys in the comments box wrote:

You didn’t understand my paper.

If you were rude and had a point, that would be acceptable. Or if you were mistaken and polite, that is also acceptable. But when you are rude & wrong then you just look like a tool.

Go re-read the paper slowly. Sit with a dictionary if it helps. You’ll get there.

1. I did read his paper, in December last year, and I did understand what he advanced, and the immoral, highly destructive force of the implications of not only what he advanced, but what the CIS is fully committed to.

2. The frist lie: Humphreys whines I was rude to him, and to the CIS. Humphreys is in no position at all to whine about manners. Here’s an example of why, and it’s from Catallaxy:

76. John Humphreys | February 25th, 2008 at 10:26 pmGerry Jackson is a muppet… and his weird little rant against me makes little sense.

He totally fails to understand my point… that the costs of a carbon tax will be offset by other tax cuts. It takes a pig-headed sort of stupidity to miss this while writing two articles.

He accuses me of inconsistency because I say that the evidence “suggests” AGW and that there is a growing consensus. 0.20c to the first person who can see the “inconsistency”.

And then he ends with a complaint about my brief introduction to Austrian economics. He makes no useful addition except for the tired old “Mises was better than Hayek” (sic) crap, and then complains about the title (which I didn’t pick).

I had wondered before why there was a falling out between Gerry & other smart free-market economists. Now I know. Gerry is a tool and a fool.

In saying that, Humphreys told a number of other lies. Firstly, what is Jackson’s “weird little rant” Humphrey’s complains of? It is this “weird little rant”:

Mr Humphreys responded with an email to a reader in which he said: “I never claimed that a tax was a free-market mechanism”. But I never accused him of making such a claim. What I did was call his approach “fallacious” and I used the following quote in support of my opinion:

Taxes do not result from a market process, nor do they reflect allocation decisions of resource owners . . . In other words, taxation is a method of intervening, not an alternative to intervention or nonmarket allocation. (O’Driscoll and Rizzo, cited in Efficiency and Externalities in an Open-Ended Universe, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2007, p. 13).

On page 2 of Exploring a Carbon Tax for Australia Humphreys unequivocally states:

A better approach to encouraging the switch to non-fossil fuels is to put a price on carbon, which makes all alternative energies relatively more competitive and then allows the market process to discover the best new energy sources.

But this underlines the very point I am trying to make. He and the Centre for Independent Studies are promoting a tax that would override the market’s allocation of resources. Humphreys also argues that the tax would be “revenue neutral”. That is totally irrelevant. What matters is the impact of the tax on capital. (I use the term capital in the Austrian sense of the word. See How the Laffer curve really works. This is why we need to drive home the point that the carbon tax is not just a tax on energy, it is a tax on Australia’s capital structure and the process of ….

Read the rest of, Why is the Centre for Independent Studies supporting the destructive carbon tax?. The above extract demonstrates what Jackson wrote is no rant, let alone a “weird little rant” against Humphreys. Humphreys is trying to convince many that Jackson was being spiteful, and nasty, and damage Jackson’s reputation. The lie is obvious.

The lie is compounded by the curious fact, while whining and railing against others for being nasty to him, falsely in Jackson’s case, his comment on Catallaxy is not isolated in its ad hominem nastiness. He has a habit of being nasty to those who find his efforts in economics fallacious and for very sound, solid reasons. Humphreys is notorious for his poison pen comments.

Humphreys, as his salacious riddled attack against Jackson shows - “Gerry is a tool and a fool”, doesn’t attack opponents’ arguments. He simply smears opponents. Humphreys is in good company with, oh let me recall as an example… ah yes, that cretin, John Quiggin. It’s easy to mistake Humphreys for being a leftist.

What makes Humphreys protests absurdly silly is, for someone who is reputed to be a free market economist, he doesn’t recognise an Austrian School analysis when it is before his eyeballs. The paper for which he smeared Jackson happens to be sound, solid Austrian School analysis.

Humphreys told another lie - “tired old Mises was better than Hayek…”. I’ve never read anything Jackson has written in which he said that. Moreover, on Jackson’s articles, it is obvious Jackson never would make such a stupid remark. So, why did Humphreys pretend to readers at Catallaxy Jackson committed such a silliness? To discredit Jackson, and do so with a smear.

Now, I know who is defective in economics and it is not Jackson, it is Humphreys and the CIS. Here is my turn.

Humphreys finds my barbs against his rot and the CIS “rude”. Well, as readers can judge for themselves, there are many good reasons for not playing footsies with the garbage Humphreys and the CIS put out. What makes Humphreys’ position all the more indefensible is the clear lack of grip on capital and the blindingly obvious impact of taxes, inclusive of regulation; they destroy capital, and what is more, eliminates advantages of producing goods in Australia, and let’s demonstrate this with telling examples:

There is already a flight of capital out of Australia due to the hideous tax burden imposed by the Federal Governments, States’ Governments, and Local Councils. Heinz shut its Dandenong plant precisely for those reasons. In the 1980’s, ICI and Hoechst ran in 1980’s money $2billions/annum of production in Australia.

They shut their plants down because of the sacking of capital and all other burdens that wiped out the advantage they did once have in producing in Australia. As for supplying Australia with their products, their former head offices are now only small sales offices. They had warned the Hawke Government that that would be the upshot if the Govt. did not get off their backs.

Today I’m watching entrepreneurs doing one of three things in Victoria, in fact over the last four years:

1. Set up production in other countries, ruling Australia out. China is proving a very popular place in which to invest capital.

2. Shutting down plant in Australia and opening up in China, India and other countries.

3. Deciding to quit altogether and retire. I have a number of acquaintances who each made this decision last year. They will shut down their production plants in Australia this year.

I had an uncle, a classical Liberal, and who was an entrepreneurial manufacturer. He shut down his plants for the same reasons. He didn’t wish to, and he didn’t wish to turn his men out onto the heap of the unemployed, but it was either that or total ruination and he had his family to keep too.

There is one other thing to observe, on the administrative side, in my assessment, it is now such that it is beginning to cripple the capacity of entrepreneurs and their managers to successfully run firms. If the tax burden doesn’t finish many off first, some will still fall over because compliance is thoroughly sapping the capacity to run firms. This is matched by the rise of bureaucrats over market driven decision-makers in firms.

Now, that is occurring today, before the impact of the planned “Kyoto compliance” measures. What is horrifying is the sheer scale and destructive force of ‘carbon credits and trading’ or any other carbon tax. The force is capital destruction on a massive scale. No tax is ‘neutral’, marked by the fact they sap capital. As I wrote in the first item:

I doubt if you have a clue as to the damage being wreaked by all other taxes -inclusive of regulation on production in Australia. I doubt very much you have a single clue as to the flight of capital out of Australia and entrepreneurs and investors deciding to set up production in other countries.

That is apart from chaps I know who have simply decided to shut down their factories this year. This is before the devastation that will be wrought by such criminal frauds as carbon trading credit.

It almost seems lame to say, the CIS, and IPA, have no grip on capital theory, in the face of the horrendous ramifications of the measures they advocate. For I am now thoroughly convinced they do not even have an inkling of the sorts of realities I have just enumerated. I repeat what I wrote under the subsection, The Morality of the CIS and IPA:

What is truly objectionable is types like you advocating measures which are devastating in force, entail real cruelty against Australians, and are criminal in force. Types like you and your bosses in the CIS pretend to be free market economists and fighters, while in reality covering up for scumbags, and working out how to bludgeon modest Australians into the dust.

I assumed the meaning was plain enough but it seems expansion is needed. The carnage existing taxes wreak is savage enough. Carbon taxation, in wiping out capital on a massive scale, is nothing less than politicians, bureaucrats, aided, abetted and fully supported by the CIS and their pals, deliberately forcing large numbers of Australians into outright destitution. That will be the upshot.

These types have no moral compass at all - forget their defective economics. These types are so conceited they just don’t have clue about the realities many Australians have to deal with. Nor do they give a stuff about the fact they will be cuplable of deliberatley throwing very many Australians into appalling misery.

The reason they have no moral compass is, they are cosseted, professional dole bludgers, who have never engaged in real, market driven enterprises. They have never engaged in real production, and thus have never run the gauntlet of rapacious politicians and bureaucrats.

These cosseted know it alls have the hide to smear a fine economist in Jackson. These navel gazing spoilt brats are concerned with only themselves and their fat wallets. And what makes this even more unamusing is at least one of them, Mr. Peter Yates, has a direct vested interest in the fraud the Rudd Govt. is about to perpetrate. At least one CIS principal is profiting from the viscious, wicked, rotten fraud of ‘carbon credit trading’: Yate’s direct interest is no secret, it’s a published fact

Humphreys, as on each other point, avoids answering what is a serious matter, the CIS’ obvious conflict of interest on this count. Humphreys sees nothing wrong in this?!

Humphreys and the CIS are moral cretins. Their credibility as economists is, in my books, non-existent. Humphreys has only further exposed their dross by telling lies and then whining should anyone shred his papers for sound reasons.

Humphreys dares whine about rudeness when he slimes others, freely. What makes this funnier is my “rudeness” is rooted in the appallingly immoral force of what that lot are actually promoting. Humphreys suffers the sooky notion that irredeemably bad ideas and vile measures should not be robustly eviscerated and those who advance them dealt with accordingly. Rubbish.

Those sods can calmly advocate measures that mean ruination for many modest Australians. Not only advocate them, but also as their conflict of interest indicates, enrich themselves through Govt. imposing such savage measures. That lot is in good company with those scumbags called Ron Walker, Hugh Morgan, Steve Bracks, John Brumby, Hulls. Now we have little fat fascist Kevin Rudd and the “Brownshorts”.

What sort of men and women are the men and women in the CIS and IPA? Cowards, unprincipled, and venal are only a few adjectives in a very long list. No wonder the treacherous left love them and the HR Nicholls Society. Oh, dear, dear, dear, I hurt little Johnny’s feelings - here, have a tissue you great big sook.

While Humphreys wipes his nose, we can muse, he is a liar. He is caught red-handed in lying and that makes him a liar. And he has the hide to smear his superior in Jackson and whine about what I said. I am, however, grateful to Humphreys, because he is a wide open window for the public to peer through into the CIS, the IPA and Australia’s rightwing, and see them for what they really are.

Humphreys and the CIS, and the IPA have no credibility at all.

In, “Centre of Independent Studies and the Institute of Public Affairs are covering for ‘alternative energy’ scams”, I wrote Hugh Morgan had put that devotee of Castro’s Stalinist regime. I made an inadvertent mistake, as I should have written Tricia Caswell.

This retractional correction does not let Morgan off the hook at all. Tricia Caswell is also treacherous leftist fully committed to the cause of the Greens, which we have written is a front set up in the 1960’s by the KGB to undermine the West, and as we remarked in, “Destructive Western Governments (continued): Putin and the KGB are reaping the crop they sowed in the 1960’s, the Greens” (8/2/2008), the KGB is now collecting.

What sort of a thuggish clown is Morgan to seize shareholder’s funds to line that rotten cow’s bank vaults?

I recall sessions with city acquaintances. We were all purple with fury at what Morgan was doing to WMC, and the final insult was putting that treacherous, communist bitch onto the payroll. That is the man who now expects to receive another fortune, with his mate Ronnie “Biggs” Walker by Rudd simply killing of coal based energy companies and stealing billions of dollars from real taxpayers to prop up their proposed pseudo-business, a nuclear powered energy plant.

Well, it figures. Morgan was never an entrepreneur. It shows in his record, the destruction of WMC. What a joke that man is. All through his all too long years as CEO of WMC, he opined, “My job is to serve the shareholders”.

No, the job of entrepreneurs is to drive capital and do so by serving consumers by producing goods they demand at prices they value them at. Morgan only treated both with contempt, customers and shareholders.

Having blown away shareholder’ capital, and a few millions of it down the throats of Caswell and those rightwing professional dole bludgers in the IPA and CIS, no bells rung alarm in Liberal MPs heads, the man, and his pals, should not have even been considered to lead the Government’s fight for labour market reform.

Morgan and his chums are worse than buffoons. Tricia bloody Caswell. That man’s head should have rolled over the Canadian mine scandal, in which he wiped out a billion dollars of capital, and then he would not have had the chance to line that rotten leftist’s pockets with gold taken from shareholders, and wipe out the rest of their capital.

I repeat that instead of mollifying that man, shareholders should have rammed him through the courts to recover some of the billions he blew away. That is, the millions he threw down the gullets of Caswell, IPA and CIS. They were not his funds. He did not ask shareholders, he just seized some of their funds and threw it down the throats of scoundrels.

What do the CIS and IPA have in common? Answer: Hugh Morgan. Besides destroying WMC, then wrecking the campaign for labour market reform and inflicting great damage on the Liberal Party, what other little destructive schemes is he involved in? The answer is, ‘alternative energy’ scams.

The CIS is less than candid with the Australian public, and its donors. It, in fact, has a direct conflict of interest, detonating on its seniors’ full endorsement of Humphrey’s very defective paper, “Exploring a Carbon Tax for Australia”. The conflict is this: direct pecuniary interests in ‘alternative energy’ and ‘carbon credits trading’.

The upshot is the CIS has no credibilty at all, marked by a blatant and yet idiotic attempt to conceal their conflict of interest in what is a very serious matter. It is a matter that if executed by the Rudd Cabinet, means real misery for millions of Australians and real capital destruction on a massive scale. The dishonesty of the CIS is deliberate.

There are those who, when they have read this article, might even add, “they have deliberately committed intellectual fraud, in a lame attempt to conceal their real interests.” What the CIS has done is very bad. Read on and find out why.

A fascinating snippet.

A director of the CIS, Mr. Peter Yates, has an immediate vested interest in one of the scams. Mr. Yates is also a director of the ‘carbon credit trading company’, Peony Capital. Does anyone else involved in the CIS have a vested interest in Peony, and also any other scam called an ‘alternative energy’ or ‘credit trading’ pseudo-business?

Bill Gates and his wife supplied the funds for Peony. One never questioned Gates the entrepreneur who revolutionised the computer, delivering a great machine right into the home. Outside his forte, he has shown a propensity to silliness, even stupidity. Gates takes up leftists causes. Or, perhaps, he just wishes to feel loved. His cave in to”Global warming” is a nasty indication of shallowness, a nastiness heightened by his decision to back the fraud of ‘carbon credits’ and ‘trade’ in them.

Sucking up to the US Democrats hasn’t paid off, since they punished Microsoft or, rather, through Microsoft consumers of its products. What the Clintons and their fellow Stalinistos do, the Euro socialists adopt, and they stuck the knife in further, as the latest Euro kangaroo court ruling against Microsoft shows. It’s plain why: Bill Gates didn’t hand over a big enough bribe to the Clintons and Al Gore. Yet, Gates persists in appeasing leftists.

Peony is, curiously, based in China. How convenient, given Kevin Rudd is attacking allies such as Japan, while bending low over for the Peking Geratric Buggery club. All this and preparing to impose ‘carbon credits’ on Australians. It’s more than convenient, its a cosy set up for those who are about to fill their bank accounts on the back of another massive fraud. The purpose of Peony is to clean up in “carbon credit trading” and not capital investment in real free market production. Peony’s website is at least honest about the thuggery it was set up for:

Our focus is on achieving attractive returns by investing in sustainable development projects and then managing the carbon credits created. We make equity investments in selected projects.

Working in partnership with project developers, financial institutions and the Chinese government, Peony invests in CDM projects in China that have the potential to generate CERs.

and remaining fully involved in the project to ensure the maximum delivery of the CERs.

Ron Walker and Hugh Morgan; their ‘alterantive energy scheme’ to get hold of billions of dollars out of hard taxed Australians, courtesy of their best mates - ALP Governments.

With his mate Ron Walker, already wealthy thanks to the racket called the Grand Prix, Morgan too wants to be made wealthier than he already is via professional dole bludging. How? Morgan and his fellow scumbag called Ron Walker want the Federal Government to rob modest real taxpayers of their hard-earned pay and transfer the proceeds into their fat bank accounts through an ‘alternative energy’ racket, in the form of nuclear power generation.

The coal fired electricity plants are clean, low cost, very efficient, marked by the sheer capacity supplied at low prices – that would be even lower if it were not for Australia’s politicians and bureaucrats. Walker and Morgan consider themselves fine Liberal Party members. Ordinary members, and most modest Australians know what they, and their pals the likes of Costello and Kroger really are. Morgan considers himself a great defender of classical Liberalism and, crucially, classical economics. What Morgan really is shows up how delusional he is in this conceit.

Remember, Morgan is the man who in 2005 puckered up to ABC TV cameras, in the odd belief the camera loved him. ABC TV cameras did, as Morgan destroyed the campaign for Labour market reform and the Liberal Party’s 2008 re-election chance in a matter of a few minutes.

Morgan has showed his colours. He is not a genuine Liberal at all. He, as his pals, doesn’t give a stuff about economic liberty and general Liberal principles at all. They are concerned with only one thing, themselves. Neither does he give a stuff about the damage he has inflicted on many Australians, nor the economic destruction that can be wrought by satiating the Green Goddess of Death.

Not Hugh Morgan. No, with his fellow parasite called a Ron Walker, Hugh Morgan puckered up once more for the cameras, last year. He and Ronnie “Biggs” Walker announced through the media they were setting up a nuclear power company.

Ronnie “Biggs” Walker is no more an entrepreneur than Morgan is. He is cheify weify, for example, of the Fairfax communist propaganda rag, The Age. The Age was saved from a well-deserved fate, bankruptcy and closure, courtesy of Ron’s two other close pals, Steve Bracks and Brumby. Those two thugs shovel mountains of taxpayers stolen pay packets to prop up the Spencer Street Soviet’s “Pravda”.

It’s funny really, a ‘Liberal’ in charge of a Stalinist organ, which makes ‘profit’ courtesy of the larceny of the Bracks-Brumby Cabinets. A ‘Liberal’ who appointed the Trotskyite Jaspan editor of ‘Pravda’. A ‘Liberal’ who has made another fortune by the same type of mechanism, Bracks and Brumby transferring millions of stolen property into his pockets, using that exercise in economic cretinism, the Grand Prix as an excuse. Walker and Morgan expected Morgan’s mate, Peter Costello, to do for them what Bracks and Brumby have done so generously for Walker.

It might seem sad their hopes were dashed when Howard was defeated, and their fellow rightwing parasite, Peter Costello, denied his ambition, ‘power’. It’s not sad; Ron Walker has obvious advantages as Morgan’s partner. Walker shows how you can suck up to leftists and do splendidly: “Hughie; you’ll see, Rudd will come round and fund our nuclear energy company; the left are my best bed pals.”

What has to happen for their scheme to get up is not only Rudd transferring hundreds of millions per annum into their coffers. The economically efficient coal fired electricity production firms have to be priced out of existence. In their media conference, Ron and Hugh said just that: the government should force the price of coal generated electricity up to a level that makes sinking funds into nuclear power plants viable. This amounts to three things.

It’s a direct subsidy, through govt. using coercion to force prices up, and that is before other types of transfers. Capital destruction, and not only of the coal based energy companies. The coerced immiseration of Australians, from the cut in power supply, to shouldering the consequences of economic carnage, including more unemployed Australians. The editor of Brookesnews has covered the second fact only this week,

Why is the Centre for Independent Studies supporting the destructive carbon tax?

Next to the destruction of capital and the immiseration of millions of Australians due to the ‘alternative energy’ scams and ‘greenhouse gas reduction’ fraud, the rub is clear. The racketeers behind ‘windmill’ and ‘ethanol’ ‘firms are being made wealthy due only to coercion by State’s and Federal Govts.

After all, without the violence of coercion, those schemes don’t in free markets survive a casual idea tossing and binning it session. To mark this, Bracks and Brumby compelled all Victorians by an “Act of Parliament” to directly subsidise the windmill fraud they set up. Now Victorians have to pay for another fraud cooked up between Bracks and Brumby, the ‘desalinisation plant’.

What is the definition of ‘alternative energy’?
Answer: an excuse for an already wealthy, bi-partisan oligarchy to enrich themselves many times more by seizing real taxpayers’ private property.

How the ‘alternative energy swindles are mounted.

Faced with those bare facts, we see the difficulty faced by the racketeers. It’s not simply that their fraudulent operations could never be established in free markets. Most Australians would be very hostile at any attempt to impose them. The ‘bosses’ ( they put the Mafia to shame) have had to prepare the way through political propaganda campaigns.

The grand lie of man causes global warming has been one leg of a monstrous propaganda campaign mounted not just by the Greens, the Democrats, the ALP, and the media. The ‘wets’ and ‘ dries’ in the Liberal Party and the National Party also, having thrown millions of taxpayers dollars at it, inclusive of a deliberate brainwashing progrom which was directed at schools.

Coalition Ministers boasted in Parliament of their brainwashing progroms for school children. They probably studied Peter Garrett’s ‘bible’, the KGB handbook for the Greens, ‘How to corrupt children’). This is where the CIS and IPA come into the picture.

Morgan threw millions of WMC shareholder funds at the IPA and CIS. Morgan, bye the bye, appointed that devotee of Fidel Castro, and notorious Melbourne neo-Marxist, Joan Coxsedge as environmental adviser to WMC. It puzzles me why shareholders endured that man’s perfidious habits, and did not, instead of mollifying, him, ram him through the courts to recover every cent he plundered in order to line the pockets of Coxsedge and those professional dole bludgers in the IPA and CIS.

In the above linked article Jackson condemned the very bad paper by John Humphreys, “Exploring a Carbon Tax for Australia”. I had also attacked it, last year, in, “The odd couple”

What is pointed is, the IPA has not fought for free markets either. “Privatisation”, for example and one of their great ’causes’, has nothing to do with free market supply, and thus really serving consumers. It is about extracting as much revenue as possible from long suffering modest Australians and funneling it straight into the coffers of ‘government’. Bracks’ and Brumby’s treatment of the ‘privatised’ firms in Victoria typifies this real aim. The IPA in its “Bash Howard” bumper issue demanded what that lot did to Victorians should be made policy in all other states.

Like the CIS, the IPA’s position is not fighting politicians and bureaucrats over wrecking markets and with it, destruction of capital through regulation and all other types of taxation. No, as many an article in the IPA alone makes plain; they are concerned to ensure ‘government’ imposes the ‘right sort’ of burdens and this begs the question; What sort is the right sort?

Next to other destructive implications, taxation (regulation is a tax) is also a ‘backdoor’ means of protectionism. To follow the money trail, ask the question, Who benefits? Maintaining the lie of man causes global warming to conceal the aim, both the CIS and IPA are serving only the scammers behind ‘alternative energy’ ‘firms’.

Humphreys, in his paper, has only mounted a false excuse for what Ron Walker and Hugh Morgan seek; the ruination of coal fired plants, and additional massive capital destruction of many producers of other goods, in order to set up their grand swindle of nuclear generation of electricity. This is exactly what the CIS and IPA are leading up to.

It is blindingly obvious that is the objective because of a few simple facts. Windmills and ‘solar’ are totally useless for electricity generation. There is only one alternative to coal fired plants, nuclear power plants. Bingo! And the ugly mugs of those two parasitical scumbags emerge in full view: Hugh Morgan, Ron Walker, along with their leftist bed pals, Brumby, Bracks, and who else is behind their plan to once again defraud Australians of billions of dollars. Notice also, Bracks is now an ‘economic adviser’ to Rudd.

This is one plot the CIS and IPA are flying cover for. I am not saying that that is why Humphreys wrote the tripe he did. The question mark hangs over the CIS, which praised Humphreys’ deception on carbon taxes and co2 emissions to the hilt. Then, as set out above, there is Yates and Peony.

The Morality of the CIS and IPA

Let’s not overlook the gross immorality of both Humphreys and the CIS, and the IPA, in pushing positions that are hideous in the implications. Their morality is the same as that of Ron Walker and Hugh Morgan; they don’t give a stuff about the sheer carnage and immiseration of millions of Australians such vile positions entail. From Jackson’s article, one formed the strong impression Humphreys resents Jackson for his lucid demolition of what is a bad paper. I advise Humphreys of this:

What is truly objectionable is types like you advocating measures which are devastating in force, entail real cruelty against Australians, and are criminal in force. Types like you and your bosses in the CIS pretend to be free market economists and fighters, while in reality covering up for scumbags, and working out how to bludgeon modest Australians into the dust.

It’s worse. As we have seen, it turns out that at least one of the prinicpals of the CIS has a direct, vested interest in Governments imposing the highly destructive, wicked measure of ‘carbon credits and trading’.

Types like you put that little fat fascist called Kevin Rudd, and green guru Peter “ Corrupter of Youth” Garrett and his female Gaiae priestess Penny Wong onto the government benches. Types like you made scumbags such as Ron Walker wealthy men, out of stolen private property. Types like you have helped the Kennett - Stockdale and Bracks and Brumby Cabinets steal billions of dollars from Victorians through such deceptions as privatisation, instead of returning production to free market enterprise resting on unfettered private property rights. That is the morality of the IPA and CIS.

The claim man is causing global warming is a lie. It rests on lies and not science. First Coalition Ministers, now ALP Ministers under Kevin “Mussolini” Rudd are using the lies as an excuse to burden Australians with more regulations and smash capital. Those liars Bracks and Brumby lead the way, in punishing Victorians with windmill scams, and desalination plants (instead of letting free market entities build massive new dams), and other controls.

The Coalition ministers Kemp, Campbell and Turnbull joined in these criminal actions against Australians by setting up the ethanol scam. It’s a scam fully supported by driveling fools such as Andrew Bolt (another parrot for the racketeers behind the ethanol syndicates falsely called businesses). And the CIS and IPA are pushing for more ‘alternative energy’ swindles to be perpetrated by politicians and bureaucrats against Australians. At least one of the CIS’ principals is a direct beneficiary of these vile schemes. How many more in the CIS, and for that matter the IPA, have direct interests in the perpetration of these massive frauds?

They, the IPA, CIS, and the HR Nicholls Society are ‘defenders of Liberty’, and ‘Leading free market economists’? To use a good old ‘ockerism’, bullshit. But its worse than bullshit.

The pecuniary interests of Ron Walker, Hugh Morgan, Rudd and his Cabinet of “brownshorts”, Steve Bracks, and the CIS and its Yates and his Peony directorship intersect. This is what Humphrey so badly defended in his paper, an oligarchcy of rotters. This is the real reason for the existence of the IPA and CIS, to justify a pack of wealthy cretins trampling over Australians, as they get on with schemes the modest man would assume are merely the mad dreams of insane cleptomaniacs

Postscript.

Given the CIS’ interest in seeing Federal and States’ Govts. perpetrate massive frauds, using the total lie that Co2 emissions causes global warming as the excuse, it is clear why they had Humphreys attack Jackson’s demolition of their nasty ‘case’ for carbon taxes and ‘trading’, cowardice.

In view of his very bad paper, they must be as thick as two bricks to have Humphreys to cover their backsides by attacking Jackson’s solid rebuttal of their nonsense. Why did they have him do that? Did they believe that that way they wouldn’t be found out if they hid themselves in their bunker and sent boy Johnny out to exchange blows with Jackson?

If so, here we are, I have uncovered the most illuminiating revelations set out above. In that case, they haven’t been merely found out, they have been caught red-handed in their grotty act of deceit. A deceit papered over by a shabby attempt to conceal their disgusting, highly immoral conflict of interest.

Gee, if I could unearth the matter effortlessly, how many others have also discovered their ‘dirty little secrets’? The power of the internet seems to bamboozle them.

Didn’t it occur to them that in view of how bad his paper is, any attempt by Humphreys to rebut Jackson would only pulverise the slivers of glass from the window he smashed unaided in that paper? Apparently not. They at the CIS can rest assured, Humphreys has succeeded in throwing more bricks at the thoroughly shattered remains of their credibility.

Anyone who is a friend of Mr. Jackson might bring this article to his attention. On the strength of his news weekly, I believe he will find these revelations highly amusing.

The CIS caught red-handed.

It is not a question really. There is no distinction in force between using ‘fascist’ and ‘statist’, but I have received objections to the use of the term fascism. The first is, the left have succeeded in nullifying the word, and the second is, readers might find it offensive, and so not read on. Well, a spade is a spade and not dining cutlery, and the Rudd Cabinet is a fascist cabinet. Here are the reason’s why:

The cult of nature, for which millions of Australians are to be sacrificed. We don’t need to expand on this here.

Corporatism
Wayne Swann in Parliament stated: foreign investment in Australia, while “welcome”, ‘must meet national aims’. In free markets, investment is sinking capital into production of capital goods and final goods, to satisfy what free men and women value and not what nasty, little cretins like Swann, Rudd, Crean, Ferguson and Penny Wong dictate Australians may or may not have.

Secondly, the suborning of enterprises to carry out centrally dictated ‘economic plans’, much assisted by vainglorious businessmen who believe supping with the devil is a good thing - until the devil seizes hold of the fork and eviscerates their firms.

Another symptom is Rudd’s dud, the 1,000 strong conference of nobodies who are also enamoured with the idea of playing at being little jackbooted dictators. Though, the real point to the ‘conference’ should be obvious, and it is not Rudd’s rubbish about -long-term vision’.

Real, entrepreneurial companies, take a very long -term view of things. That is why, for example, BHP, or ICI sink billions of dollars of capital, even build whole towns as aprt of their pay to labour. What we have involved here is information informing decision making that only classical economics, now conducted only by the “Austrian School”, explains. The sort of information required that only free markets generate. Of economics, Rudd, as is his finger Puppet Wayne Swann, is entirely ignorant.

No, it is to prepare a nastier surprise of making Australians as responsible for the actions of Cabinet as the Ministers themselves. The devastation that will be wrought by Rudd’s ‘Watermelon Red’ policies, his national socialist economic planning, his policy of pricing many Australians onto the scrap heap of the unemployed (and these are just a few of the items by which he will immiserate millions of Australians), will be depicted as the ‘collectively agreed will of the people’ and ‘brainstorm’ of the visionary 1000. Rudd, furthermore, will thus immediately blame the 1000 nobodies for the hell he is preparing to set loose.

That fascist slob, who threw millions of Americans onto the bonfire of unemployment, FDR once said, “together we will fight the depression and win”. How odd it is, that line is frequently uttered by Rudd, ” together we can fight inflation… together we can beat this”. Even odder, that expression has been favoured by wall the worst dictators in history.

Nationalism, not patriotism, stamps the Rudd cabinet.

It cannot be ignored the Howard cabinet, in its last two terms, began veering onto the Nationalist Socialist road. With it, organised sport, and the cult of the ‘body’. To this, Rudd has announced Australia must host a World Soccer Cup tournament as a matter of national pride and, I suppose, “group bonding” - (”boonga boonga” and “oom” to that rubbish).

Notice the collectivist strain, made all the nastier, when inflation is not, for example, prices rising, but the RBA forging money hand over fist. Contrary to Liberal Party fascists, Swann’s complaint about inflation is not mistaken. Unfortunately, just like Liberal fascists, the ALP ‘brown-shorts’ are ignorant as to the cause, and thus the cure. So, Rudd and Swann, can trollop around the country, mouthing nasty little slogans, but like that equally, rightwing fascist ignoramus Peter Costello, they won’t stop inflation.

In the meantime, they are setting up commissars of pricing. Indeed, Rudd has a bureaucratic solution for everything. He is a committed central planner and he will succeed as central planners do, in the wreaking of economic carnage.

The top note is the incipient totalitarianism in the Rudd-ALP fascist ‘grand vision’, and for the Rudd administration to proceed as they declared, increasingly naked totalitarian force is inevitable.

As a summary of what is plain to observe, the real question is, how did things reach such a pass, that a Shadow ministry of fascist cretins be flung into Cabinet?

The answer is the left wing and the right wing, from Malcolm Fraser and on, have completely betrayed liberal principles, and with it completely wrecked the Liberal Party.

The wash up was the likes of Costello, Kroger, Nick Minchin, Nelson, Ian Campbell, David Kemp, Chris Pyne. These conceited, ignorant, self-serving wreckers were complemented by the equally culpable CIS, IPA, HR Nicholls Society, Andrew Bolt and Janet Albrechtson. This lot not only wrecked the Liberal Party and handed victory to Rudd and the ALP. That lot put in place many of the Fascist policies Rudd is now busy intensifying and adding to.

Yet, that was the whole point to Albrechtson’s neo-Nazi call for a ‘rightwing’ institutional coup-de tat. That lot have never been Liberals. There aim has been the same as the Left’s, power and incipiently totalitarian control over Australians. These parasites prepared the way for Kevin “Mussolini” Rudd.

The Bracks-Brumby regime of Brackistan has announced another bolt to ensure its totalitarian aims. I’ve long said that Bracks, Brumby and Hulls were bent on totalitarianism. I’ve been ridiculed for it in the past. Well, the is freely bandied today by the media, by serving policemen, and others who until today, would never have said that against Bracks and Brumby administrations.

I said some time ago Brackistan is an indication of where not only the Federal ALP but the Coalition parties were heading. Well, the day has arrived, and it comes in the form of that oleaginous liar called Kevin “Mussolini” Rudd.

It wasn’t for mere amusement I set the line in the title banner of this site:

Free markets, capital, absolute property rights, and entrepreneurs are the bedrock of civilisation.They dragged man out of the gutters,civilised him,dignified him,gave him liberty.Socialism is an excuse to pauperise untold millions,enslave untold millions,murder untold millions, over a century now: Why has the Liberal Party shifted to the code of savages?

Yes he is. He showed his colours when he announced the Rudd cabinet would seize the private property of Papuans. I am referring to his vicious machinations to stop an Australian company and local landowners proceeding with a mining venture along the Kokoda Trail, PNG. This is apart from the threat he issued against the company, should it proceed.

The venture means not only good, well paid jobs for some of the locals. Since the locals are the landowners of the site, it also involves a very rewarding proft sharing arrangment the company happily, volitionally struck with them. Swann said they the “natives” should, instead, be content to remain bag carriers for spoilt Australian brats, and other thumb-sucking drivellers seeking the ‘oom experience’ to be had, apparently, from walking the Kokoda trail.

‘Walking the Kokoda trail’ made easy be natives, who should be grateful to carry bags. Wayne Swann said ‘ the tourist dollar’ is “sufficient income for them”. They don’t want to remain destitute. Tourism is not investment. They wish to prosper, and this gets up the nostrils of Australian politicians and their ‘watermelon red’ pals the Greens. The monkeys pretending to be Liberal Politicians are, again, noticeable for their silence on Swann’s disgusting action.

Swann went further. He said, they should not only be content to be bag carriers for conceited, delinquents pretending to tap into some mythical beast called a great (Anzac) Spirit, but the Australian Government could pay the PNG Government ‘compensation’. Gee, that would be nice for the bureaucrats and politicians feeding at another hogs’ trough in Port Moresby. It won’t of course be nice for that much abused and fast diminishing rare species Australian taxpayers. As for the local landowners, they can get stuffed, and the officers of the mining company can be thrown into jail should they defy Herr Rudd and his finger puppet Wayne Swann.

What Swann is saying is this: the Australian Government will strip the locals of their property rights, and reduce them to permanent mendicancy, relieved by the nasty job of carrying bags for tourist trash form Australia. Tourist trash that simper about their precious feelings, on returning form PNG, and their great ‘oom experience’. The natives must be ingrates for desiring something better than that.

Yet, that pretty well sums up the history of ‘Aboriginal Policy’ from the 1970’s in Australia. That is, Aborigines have been condemned to eternal mendicancy, in the name of keeping them in their place as ‘noble savages’. It shows, billions of dollars of transfers poured into the great scheme of preserving them as walking archaeological stiffs, with the result of large numbers of them imprisoned in the misery of primitive tribalism, desuetude, squalor, and worse.

Kevin Rudd can shove his ‘Apology’ up a piece of plumbing, for that rests on a pack of lies purveyed as “history”. The policy of reducing the Aborigines to a living hell, though, is something to apologise for. Funny this, because that is what Swann would like to do PNG villagers.

As I said before, I cheered when the locals closed the Kokoda Trail to Australian Tourist trash. They want mine, they want to prosper. Swann is a racist.

“The Coalition, the ALP, and the Department of Foreign Affairs, are not facing up to the reality of Peking’s regional ambitions which involves military aims.” That was a line I wrote in 2005. It is still true today. The upshot is Rudd is imperilling Australians.

The duplicity and treachery of the ALP over the wars in Iraq against Saddam and then Islamo-fascists, is on record. One of Rudd’s first acts as Prime Minister was to announce his withdrawal of troops from that front. His second major foray was to make gun boat threats against the Japanese over whaling, with that sniveling parasite, Garrett, crying crocodile tears over whaling. (Many Australian parents have cause to weep; to weep over what Garrett and his chums have done to many youngsters, corrupted them). Can it get worse? Yes, Rudd is doing a Clinton on China policy.

Things look very bad as it is. It seems most likely those friends of Stalinist regimes the Democrats will win the U.S. Presidential election. Since both Obama and Hilary have promised to pull out of Iraq, the treacherous left is about to hand Islamo fascists a major victory.

The Federal ALP has also treacherously attacked Howard over Iraq. That Iraq, under Saddam, was a huge terrorist training base, as one Iraqi Colonel described straight after the war against Saddam, cut no ice with Beazley and Rudd, and still does not with the latter. We are at war with Islam, and the likes of Rudd, Obama, and the Clintons promise only one thing, they will do their best to bring about the defeat of the West, and see even more Islamo savagery in the East, with Israel in line for another holocaust. All this will please Putin immensely; cf. item immediately below, “Destructive Western Governments ( continued ): Putin and the KGB are reaping the crop they sowed in the 1960’s, the Greens“.

Putin and his fellow Communist oligarchs are a real danger. Some might consider these two problems trouble enough, adherents of Islam and Putin. A third problem on top promises a really fun time, the communist regime of China. This regime might have formally dropped communism, but that is not because they have discovered the joys of civilization and fully embraced its grounds. They feared China would follow the USSR and also what that would mean for them, an end to living the high life all dictators enjoy.

In 2005, I mused on the craven stance of the Coalition, the Department of foreign Affairs and the ALP on China policy. Their stance was, and remains, bend low for a right old rogering from the Peking Geriatric Buggery Club. The China Policy, the Cabinet has Sir Humphreyed itself.

It was not quite right. Groveling before the Communist regime has long been the ALP position since Gough Whitlam, but not only for the singular reason of the Coalition. The Coalition’s position is based on the snake oil of mercantilism:

The Eldorado, the fools’ mine built on the rubbish of mercantilism; China will be an export boom for Oz. The pollies are counting on it… because the sods, Federal, State, and Local, are sending Oz into a recession which, in Victoria, and N.S.W. too this time, will be like the last, a depression. Well, trade with China is not going to save their socialist backsides (and prevent the immiseration of Australians).

The China policy, with attention to Taiwan, is copybook stuff right out of the episode of Yes Minister, “A Victory for Democracy”. The dangers of appeasing Peking were transparent back then.

What needs to be kept in clear view is; Peking has adopted the defunct Japanese position euphemistically called “The Greater Co-Prosperity Sphere”. The Allies cured the Japs of that monstrous action by dropping a couple of atomic bombs on their heads. China is not deterred.

Peking regards much of Asia and the Pacific as its territory. They include Australia; they hold Australia is their territory. Their aim is to suborn neighbouring countries and islands. I would say “subjugate” but some readers might consider it a litote, though it does sum up the aims of the commie regime of China, and we are in their gun-sights.

Rudd is worse than Downer on China. Rudd is doing a Clinton. Peter Zhang, who also calls Peking’s aim the imposition of its version of “The Greater Co-Prosperity Sphere”, summed up how the Clinton lead Stalinists fuelled their aims and in doing so, also committed high treason:

I have pointed out in other articles that Clinton’s grovelling attitude toward Beijing would have the effect of strengthening the militarists at the expense of the more cautious and reform-minded members of the regime.

The result would be an aggressive revanchist foreign policy that could destabilise the region. China’s arrogant and threatening behaviour over Taiwan demonstrates that, at least for now, the militarists still appear to be in the ascendancy.

In 1999 Admiral Dennis Blair said that the US should not defend Taiwan. The Admiral’s statement made an already dangerous situation even more volatile. This incredibly stupid announcement, made on Clinton’s behalf, encouraged the regime to issue a first strike order against Taiwan…

Not surprisingly, Beijing swiftly moved to exploit Clinton’s political ineptitude, not just by threatening Taipei with destruction but by also using it to further undermine American influence in the region….

“And all for a few million dollars in donations to the Democrats.”

(Clinton fuelled Beijing’s militarism,Peter Zhang, Brookesnews, 11/4/2005.)

The leftist media in the U.S. worked hard to bury disclosure of the Clintons’ treason, and also Al Gore’s ( he was directly involved). The reason is transparent; they knew it would lead to not simply the impeachment of both Clinton and Gore, but their trial and conviction for high treason, and that still carries the death penalty in the U.S. This is apart from other Democrat Party hacks who would have also been arraigned and convicted.

Not that Rudd has stooped as low as Clinton did, committing treason by selling top military secrets to China in return for funding of the U.S. Democrat Party. It’s too early; Rudd has been in office only a few months.

Rudd won’t even hold out for that, “a few million dollars in donations” to the ALP, and Peking knows it. Not that Lex Downer is excused. Downer, after all, when the F.O. Minister, frequently dropped Australia’s trousers for the PGBC. Rudd has only declared he is upping the ante, by changing Australia’s address to ‘Care of the Red Army Brothel, Tianamen Sq., Peking’.

Rudd will reduce Oz to the sleaze of lazing stark naked, drugged out in grimy, luridly lit rooms until the PGBC clubmen arrive. Rudd is Madam PinchoMussolinikins. He puckers up, and practices aesthetic poses and lines, and whips the girls into line.

Did he begin his great careerah as a Chinese equivalent of a wonderful geisha girl; he did spend some of his early years in China as a “diplomat”? He said he played cricket in his spare time. For our U.S. friends, cricket is a game played with balls and sticks, and Madam is at it again. Here’s the proof:

It’s not simply that as Prime Minister he has already grovelled before the PGBC ( yes, he also gives the PGBC satsifaction as a shoe shine boy). With his Foreign Minister, Stephen Smith, Rudd has told Peking he will betray our real allies, in order to service Peking:

Foreign Minister Stephen Smith confirmed during the visit of Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi to Canberra yesterday that Australia would not take part in any more four-way security meetings with Japan, the US and India.

He revealed that during his recent visit to China and Japan he informed both countries that Australia would not be attending any more of the four-way security meetings.

“I indicated when I was in Japan that Australia would not be proposing to have a dialogue of that nature,” Mr Smith said…

Mr Smith strongly criticised the Taiwanese plan for a referendum on whether the island should seek UN membership as an independent nation, and said Australia was concerned about any plan that could cause discord in the Taiwan Strait.

“It is completely inappropriate,” Mr Smith said. “It is not a helpful contribution.”

(Japan jittery over closer ties between Australia and China, “The Spencer St. Soviet”, 6/2/08)

“Not a helpful contribution”! Listen, Smith and Rudd, you spineless, little, fascist cretins, it’s about the freedom of the Taiwanese and the aim of your bed-pals in the PGBC to wipe them out. Come to that, also of Australians.

Then we read this:

When the first such meeting of officials took place in Manila last year, The Age revealed that China sent the nations involved, including Australia, a “demarche”, or diplomatic note, asking what was going on.

Chinese officials were concerned about a four-way security alliance of democracies intent on encircling China. The Howard government refused to comment on the note, but Mr Smith confirmed for the first time yesterday that it has been received

” Democracies intent on encircling China…” That is garbage, and Peking knows it is. They cannot but know it is garbage, since they are adhering to the golden rule of tell a whopping great lie and cretins will believe it. What Peking is worried about is the allied countries won’t yield to its militartistic aims - try the word conquest Rudd - try it in Mandarin.

Peking is hoping the Stalinist Democrat Party wins the U.S. Presidential election, so Hilary, or Obama can resume the treason of the Clinton’s, and clear the way for China to realise its aims. And what do we see? Madam PinchoMussolinikins and his Smithipoos imitating the Clinton and Gore policy.

The “Spencer St. Soviet” doesn’t explain what a “demarche” is. It is no mere “diplomatic note”. It is either a statement of a government’s position on a matter or demand for an explanation. So, Peking isn’t playing footsies under the table, it is serious. Now, I realise the Coalition and Lex bent over frequently for the PGBC, but for hours each time!

Since Rudd has upped the appeasement ante, Japan, understandably, sent a demarche to Smith and Rudd, demanding they explain why they are setting up house in some hovel in Peking. For, it is not only Taiwan but also Japan, that is the first target of the Red Armed Forces.

I remember vividly film footage, 1990’s, of elements of the Red Armed Forces on manoeuvres. It was shot on the Island of Sakhalin. Those soldiers were very professional, were very good. It was a stunning insight into the Red Army. The exercise was training for a possible assault against Japan.

Like a pair of juvenile schoolboys, Rudd and Smith prostitute Australia for the pleasure of the PGBC, and with it are playing games with what is an immediate grave threat to our allies, Taiwan and Japan. Bye the bye, Sakhalin, has not been returned to Japan. So, while Rudd and Smith are happy to contemplate Peking’s subjugation of Taiwan as correcting an historical mistake, are they prepared to tell China and Putin to return Sakhalin to the Japanese? No, that’s right, they wouldn’t.

The Whitlam, Fraser and Howard Cabinet’s set up the transparent dangers. Toadying to Peking only encouraged the communist regime to press Australia more, and with each concession, the politicians only made Australia bend over further. Now we have Rudd and Smith.

The message that has not been firmly put to Peking is free trade breaks down tensions, as opposed to govts. and bureaucrats who intensify them. That, if Peking is concerned to see such decent exchange, then militaristic action, including talk, is barking up the wrong tree. There we see the problem. Australian politicians are also economic illiterates, as the snake oil of mercantilism shows.

Downer was appeasing Peking when their agents were very active in Australian cities, against Chinese citizens of Australia. They are, no doubt, still pressuring Australians who are Chinese, or of Chinese descent. No doubt, their intelligence services are very active at prising out Australian secrets. Australian politicians cannot face up to the fact of why Peking is engaged in such hostile actions in Australia. They can find out why, all they have to do is ask those three traitors who sold top secrets to Peking, the Clintons and Al Gore.

Rudd is dragging Australians into danger. Putin is applying military muscle against the U.S. and its allies. We are at war with Islamo-fascists. China is bent on its “ Greater Co-Prosperity Sphere” aims, and we are in their sights. And, what are Rudd and his cabinet of fascists committed to? Handing victory over to Islamo fascists, and betraying Australians and our allies by not merely appeasing the Chinese, but selling Australia out altogether to the Chinese. That is what the Rudd Cabinet is doing.

Australia is sliding into recession. Rudd is making sure it will be another Great Depression, by imposing more savage, destructive fascist and Green policies, more taxes, more ‘regulation’ (oh, they are also preparing to impose death taxes on Australians). Not satisfied with that, Rudd will finish us off properly by baring Australia to real, military threats. This lot have probably already purchased chalets in Switzerland – nothing like a good insurance policy.

Rudd hired and armed a commercial passenger ship to threaten Japanese citizens going about their lawful, peaceful business of whaling, with that scumbag Peter Garrett gnashing his teeth against the Government of our ally. He next proceeded to further sever that alliance, and has declared he is content to see China run right over the Taiwanese and Japan. For what? To suck up to the PGBC, a regime many mainland Chinese themselves detest for the rotten pack of tyrants that they are.

Then there is Swann, threatening a mining company, and local people, our friends in Papua New Guinea, which is a Sovereign country, should they mine nearby the Kokoda Trail. Swann said, tourism pays the “natives” enough to live by.

Well, Swann, you wealthy, socialist slob, the “natives” wish to be prosperous too, and by honest means. You, on the other hand, have been made a wealthy man on the strength of nothing more than government coercion – taxation, as a professional parasite called a politician.

While Swann sits on a multi-millionaire’s income stream, and guzzling taxpayer subsidised wine, food, cars, fuel, travel, accommodation, and travel, and look forward to a taxpayer kept, untaxed, fully CPI indexed pension, so many good things he enjoys but never earned, he tells poor villagers they should be happy living the life of miserable primitives. He’s worse than a hypocrite, he’s a liar. It’s liars, Swann, who seek the immiseration of many, and condemning many more to perpetual destitution.

The Papuans hate primitivism. Tourism is consumption, not investment. The natives don’t wish to be serfs to infantile brats pretending to imbibe some mythical spirit. I cheered when the ‘natives’ closed the track down to Australians, serves them right. To our friends in Papua New Guinea, yes, they treat us as serfs too, so you are in good company.

They are twisted, absolutely twisted. They threaten peaceful people, endanger them, demand others be kept destitute, and appease tyrants. With Garrett in the picture, we are in serious trouble.

But don’t forget they are dangers sown by previous Cabinets, and their appeasement of Peking.

The British Ministry of Defence is opposed to ‘alternative energy’ frauds. It, along with every Brit, has a problem; it’s called the “Maastricht Treaty” and the successor the “Lisbon treaty”. Things look grim for Britain and Europe, and unfortunately, also for Australians under Kevin “Mussolini” Rudd and his Cabinet of ‘brownshorts’.

The British Parties have been bent on for a couple of decades now, wiping out liberty, the “high Tory” socialists as much as the Labor Party. It is understandable why they have so readily embraced the E.U. aka the “Greater Soviet Union of Europe”. The E.U. tyrants are busy outlawing many things which “causes global warming”, and imposing many burdens, inclusive of “carbon tax trading”.

Only last week the E.U. outlawed outdoor gas heaters. The marvellous invention that makes sitting in gardens, at home, in pubs, and restaurants during winter a pleasure is, according to the E.U., a dangerous criminal. The E.U.must be afraid they will turn Britain into a tropical paradise, complete with palm trees and gorgeous, Fijian girls gyrating naked in ancient fertility dance, and we can’t have that - the neo-Marxist “sistahood” would be offended at young bloods running incorrectly rampant.

I don’t believe Putin was altogether joking when on the admission of Russia to the E.U. he said, “Welcome to the Greater Soviet Union of Europe”. As for Russia, Putin wishes there had been no Perestroika and Glasnost, because someone called a Boris Yeltsin emerged who held the apparently peculiar notion Liberty for every Russian should be real and not a slogan, and that the only good communist regime is a dead one. Putin has been enjoying himself wiping out many non-red good things.

He remains the KGB thug that he is. His ‘foreign policy’ shows it, military aggression against the US and its allies, and support of Islamo-fascists in the Middle East. His re-arming of the Russian armed forces is aimed against the U.S. and allies.

What he did to Yukos, its entrepreneurs - particularly Khodorovsky, and investors, is another symptom. Also, his calling that mass murderer Stalin ‘the greatest hero of Russia and the Soviet Union’ (he seethes over the break-up of the USSR). There is no doubt what Putin and his fellow communist oligarchs are doing to the Russians, brutalising them once again, and despite his early asservations to the contrary, as President, out to sap the capitalist West.

Recently, with a companion, I had the pleasure of a chance conversation with a young Russian emigre, recently arrived to these shores. Her parents remain in Russia. She is at once sad and happy. She is happy to have escaped the hell renewed by Putin; though subtly indicated, she made it plain that is exactly what Putin is renewing. She is sad, as her patriotism and love of Russia showed. Sad also because she is far from her family and former friends. Happy, because she is building a better life.

She is now proudly Australian. She is still acquiring the English language; she was apologetic, but we reassured her that her command is not too bad at all. Her speech matched her reticence and intelligence and decency. Her accent added charm to her speech. She is the sort of immigrant Australians should welcome, and not, for example, Islamo-fascists. We wished her all the best. She induced in us the desire to see the ‘winter lights’ of St. Petersburg.

So much for Russia and emigres; I’ve digressed. The M.o.D. is implacably hostile to ‘alternative energy’ scams. Not because they are scams, and that human Co2 emissions causes “global varming” is a lie no better than, say, paranormal claims. Nor because windmills and ethanol cannot power plant, equipment, bases, aircraft, tanks, ships. The reason it has given is; windmills neutralise radar defence, not simply at low levels, but at high altitudes too. Windmills render air defence blind.

The criminal scammers called ‘windmill’ companies and their principals, with govt. authorisation were preparing to install windmills close inshore. M.o.D conducted a study that found windmills neutralise radar, and the proposed site for more windmills happens to be in direct line with radar defences. Britain would be open to air attack. Enemy combat craft and bombers could sweep in undetected.

That great danger cuts no ice with the treacherous left and the Greens in Britain, or with the criminal gangsters pretending to be entrepreneurs, the principals of windmill scams. Unsurprisingly, they are foaming at the mouth, crying the M.o.D. has fabricated the report, and working furiously to push the Cabinet into giving final clearance for the windmills.

Putin must be smiling. Putin has the Russian airforce engaging in training flights around the coast of Scotland. Russian air command, and not just Putin, must be bent up double in uncontrollable laughter. Though, Putin has reason to laugh loudest and longest.

The KGB set up and financed the “Green’s movement” in the 1960’s as a front that could not be directly linked to the KGB. They initiated the front in Germany. The KGB not only put in place very large funds to finance their new front the Greens, they also carefully selected and groomed its cadre. The cadre had to be both convincing or, rather, plausible within the West, and effective in subverting the West. It is a nice irony, involving a “tit for tat”:

It looks very much the case the KGB took a leaf out of the German’s book of warfare, the WWI edition, when they sent Lenin into Russia. On the other hand, unlike the Germans and Lenin and his fellow mass murderers, it took 2-3 decades before the Greens began achieving the successes the KBG aimed for.

The KGB’s reasoning was simple, and impeccable. Other operations were met with firm resistance in the West (allowing for treacherous sympathizers and agents of influence). Importantly, other types of subversion could be pinned directly to the KGB and this, in the Cold War, was bad publicity.

A ‘movement’ that appeared to westerners as a spontaneous movement of western youths of middle class families, engaged in ‘peaceful civil disobedience’ could do far more damage to the West than other tactics. A movement that involved a plausible cause but firmly anchored in beliefs destructive of Liberty and capitalist values, is the type of movement that makes it easier to seduce youths into the ‘movement’ and brainwash them by a gradualist approach that conceals the brainwashing, and the real aims.

An approach cruder than gradualist induction and brainwashing would have spelt the end of the new front. Adults would have spotted the dangers to their children immediately. The Front would have been investigated, perhaps initially with the aim of laying criminal charges against them; and on that, the true origin of it would have been uncovered. Oh, yes, the KGB’s planning, preparation, recruitment in the West, channeling funds, and execution was meticulous.

Putin and his chums got it right. It is funny that while the USSR collapsed Putin and his chums still reap the harvest of the seed the Greens front they planted. Western politicians are immiserating millions of people by imposing what the Greens demand, and with it undermining and overthrowing the values crucial to the success of the West.

It is not simply the destruction of capital that is the upshot; it is the destruction of values that are the grounds of freedom in the West. This is what the KGB sought through their front. This is what the politicians are now obliging the KGB with. In the case of Britain, they are even willing to betray the defence of Britain in order to appease the KGB front called the Greens.

The KGB fronts Bob Brown and Peter Garrett belong to in Australia, the Greens Party, ‘Conservation Foundation’, and subsidiaries, are, bye the bye, courtesy of the ‘mainstream’ parties and bureaucrats, also funded by taxpayers. The ignominy of it, being forced by our rotten politicians to fund nothing but KGB cells aimed at destroying the West.

The Australian Greens is not a distinct Australian movement. Their own websites make plain their ‘international’ origin and ongoing ties. These thugs are not Australian patriots. They are loyal, at bottom, to the savage country called communism.

Their shade of communism is not neo-Marxism, unlike the regime of Brackistan. The Greens are closer to the former regime of Pol Pot, or that of North Korea. Why, only yesterday, Peter Garrett spoke of, as Minister for the Cult of Death, “my powers”. That is “Green-speak”. The treacherous left is foaming at the mouth in the mistaken belief that somehow Garrett is betraying them. No he is not; he is still one of them.

He is the man who c.1995 boasted on television of his success in recruiting youths into Greens’ fronts. He boasted of how proud he was to see teenagers bringing their enthusiasm and energy to the cause. He is proud of the fact that, in the very years anyone has to get on their bicycle and establish themselves, he and his pals tapped many young Australians and abused them by the gradualist approach, to fully brainwash them.

He is proud of perverting youths, and wasting those precious years in which everyone must establish themselves. To this day, Garrett, with his Greeny chums have adhered to the modus operandi rule book written by the KGB .

Many of their victims are not wealthy, unlike the men and women who are the cadres of the Green fronts. Garrett himself, for example, is not a poor boy made good. He is the son of wealthy parents, who sent him to a leading independent school, and lots of spare cash to indulge his whims. A wealthy middle class boy who got his ticket to make more millions, a law degree.

He’s a spoilt brat who got luckier because there were sufficient numbers of dumbed down leftist youths to make him and his fellow liars wealthier by their propaganda ‘rock band’. A parasite, who made another fortune when he pocketed taxpayers dollars as chiefy weify of the Australian Conservation Foundation.

A bum who will now make many more millions in the form of the hefty pay packet of an inner Cabinet Minister. A professional dole bludger who will make one more fortune when he collects a Minister’s untaxed, fully CPI indexed superannuation fraud that taxpayers are again hit for.

That is the man who went about corrupting youths, many who are not wealthy and who had to establish their interests by working. Instead, that wealthy, lying, treacherous leftist seduced them into throwing their lives away for a cult which is nothing but a KGB front. That man, under the statutes governing Parliament, is not a “fit and proper man” to hold a seat in Parliament, let alone be Minister, and he should be stripped of the seat, and thrown out of Parliament, for the slimy, scumbag that he is.

He and his chums are corrupters of youths. What they do is why the Athenians charged Socrates of being a corrupter of youth. It wasn’t because he was a pederast, but because he was turning youths against their families, against the practices of reasonably free market Athens, against conventions, against civilised morals. They saw what Socrates was doing; he was perverting young Athenians, and turning some of them into little tyrants. It shows out in Plato, and his atrocious rubbish. The Athenians were right.

The Athenians didn’t wish to execute Socrates. They put it to him to cease his criminal activity. Socrates was defiant, he would not and on that, he left them with no choice but to force him to commit suicide. Now, one isn’t advocating the modern day corrupters of youth be made to drink poison (though, it’s a very good suggestion). They should, however, incur the loathing and contempt of most Australians, of most Westerners, because of what they are doing and on about. To this, Garrett must be thrown out of Parliament for the criminal savage that he really. A multi-millionaire barbarian who didn’t make his wealth as a genuine entrepreneur.

Garrett owes his great fortune to Australia’s fetid world of wealthy leftists and right-wingers, through his wealthy parents. He was born into that closed gene swamp. A pack of parasites who busy themselves with enriching themselves, while making sure modest Australians are buried in the joys of destitution. Rudd and his wife are the same. So are the ‘Wets’ and the ‘Dries’ of the Coalition Parties.

Garrett is the same as all those swamp pool swimmers, and be sure of it: Garrett doesn’t give a stuff about all those lives he has ruined. They are mere human sacrifices so that lying, treacherous, mega-millionaire thugs like him can feel good and beautiful. He is the same as the Krogers, the Costellos, the Pratts, the Rudds, the Swanns, leftist and rightist clerics, they hold everyone but themselves in contempt, serfs to be used up and then thrown away. That is what Garrett and his chums have done and still do to many young Australians.

The fascists who stuff the Liberal Party (’wets’ and ‘dries’), from Malcolm Fraser to the present crop of spineless, unprincipled fascists pretending to be Liberals, and the fascists and leftists who stuff the ALP, have fully embraced those rotten, vile scumbags, and not only embraced them, they have obeyed most of their wishes. They haven’t simply appeased them; they have imposed many of the Greens’ demands. Rudd is preparing to intensify the measures rammed down by David Kemp, Ian Campbell and Malcolm Turnbull, and impose even more destructive measures such as ‘carbon credits trading’.

The so-called mainstream parties find it far more amusing to play the Dictator, than to defend freedom and liberty. They are more enamoured of an unholy vision of the majority of Australians reduced to the squalor of medieval serfs, whom they in public treat as infants, which is only a sign of their real motivation, sheer contempt for modest Australians. The Malcolm Frasers, the Union Bosses, Wets, Dries, The Krogers and the Costellos and their stick Puppets, are much happier cultivating those who are the same as they are, wealthy scumbags.

In their conceit, they are oblivious also to other dangers, internal and external, they deliberately incur because of their craven embrace of the death cult of the Greens, environmentalism. But then, that is typical of not simply the treacherous left, but Australia’s rightwing too.

What an irony, Britain might be rendered vulnerable in airwarfare because of the Green cult. It wasn’t too long ago that the Corrupter of Youth was pounding out his Stalinist propaganda, calling for the elimination of military facilities, excoriating our ally the US with it. That scumbag is now a Cabinet Minister. Taken with Rudd et al., we are in deep, deep trouble.

We will continue in other items on what Kevin “Mussolini” Rudd and the “brownpants” are about to do: sacrifice more Australians to pacify Mot, the ancient god of death.

What was predicted early in January this year is now coming true, and the first symptom of it is food riots in Indonesia, the ethanol scam will cut food supply, through destruction of the lattice of food production:

BMO strategist Donald Coxe warns credit crunch and soaring oil prices will pale in comparison to looming catastrophe…

“It’s not a matter of if, but when,” he warned investors. “It’s going to hit this year hard.”

The greatest challenge to the world is not US$100 oil; it’s getting enough food …

At the centre of the imminent food catastrophe is corn - the main staple of the ethanol industry.

With 54% of the world’s corn supply grown in America’s mid-west, the U.S. is one of those countries with an edge.

But Mr. Coxe warned U.S. corn exports were in danger of seizing up in about three years if the country continues to subsidize ethanol production. Biofuels are expected to eat up about a third of America’s grain harvest in 2007.

The amount of U.S. grain currently stored for following seasons was the lowest on record, relative to consumption, he said.

Liberal Government culpable of economic carnage.
Monday, January 7, 2008

Coaxe’s warning was published on the 8th of January. Barely a week later riots broke out in Indonesia over the cut in food supply, due to the ethanol scam:

On Monday, January 14, it (Indonesia) experienced a brand new type of disturbance, the world’s first food riot caused by another nation pandering to the global warming mob. Indonesians took to the streets, demanding that their government to do something about the price of soybeans, a dietary staple…

In other countries, there will be more riots, perhaps a coup or two, some pretty hungry people, maybe some genocide. And everywhere not a dram of a change in climate owing to ethanol will ever be measured.

The sad fact is that Indonesia’s unrest is only the slightest foreshock preceding the massive civil earthquake that is going to be unleashed as more and more absurd policies are mandated by the global warming mob.

While that terrible development is due to the diversion of crop prodicution to supplying the heavily tax payer subsidised ethanol scam in the US, it mustnot be overlooked, this is what Australian politicians have done.

It is amusing that while the Australian mainstream media have, for example, shed crocodile tears over that vile, malicious, criminal thug called Paul Watson, who should be shot because of his actions, they have not said a word about those riots, and why Indonesians rioted. We are more likely, instead, to hear of the wonders of Fidel Castro’s Paradise, with the rightwing in full support, through the heroic voice of their starlet, that kid called Chris Berg (Editor of the IPA).

It is disgusting that it was three former Liberal Party Federal Ministers who imposed “watermelon red’ measures. Those three, David Kemp, Ian Campbell, and Malcolm Turnbull imposed the ethanol scam in Australia. Turnbull’s statement on his first morning as the ‘High Priest of the cult of Death’, sums up the actions of each of those three ministers, and to refresh the noodles I repeat form an earlier item:

“ Everyone knows that price increases in resources; yields to greater economic efficiency.”
He expand, to “ fight” climate change”, prices of resources have to be forced up.

What Turnbull actually is saying is this: he is going to trash production in Australia and immiserate Australians. That is what that man is saying. He is clearly an ignorant man in economics, and in science, but that doesn’t excuse his “watermelon red” ‘policies’. No wonder the Greens, the Left, and that “corrupter of youth”, Peter Garrett, smell blood. When you have a complete dunce like Turnbull busily preparing to ram down what the Greens demand (to complete what his predecessors Kemp and Campbell set in train), the economic devastation of Australians economically… in the name of pacifying the goddess of death…

That Co2 emissions causes global warming is a lie. The claim man compounds that ‘effect’ through production is an intensification of that lie. The lie, in reality, is only an excuse Western politicians have latched onto in order to justify their increasingly totalitarian aims. Nothing less than that can be said of the whole fraud.

Right now, for example, Rudd is preparing to impose “carbon trading”. It is a tax, and also the deliberate destruction of capital. That means, all Australians will find their pay, their living standards, and their freedoms will be reduced greatly by that measure alone. Add on measures such as diversion of agricultural production into the ethanol scam and it doesn’t take a genius to see, we are in great danger.

It is a danger that is heightened by the fact the politicians and bureaucrats have confiscated huge tracts of land in the name of the ” Environment’. To this, they have refused to allow companies to build massive dams. Notice that no production of anything at all can occur without water. Do not forget, these treacherous acts of larceny have been fully supported by the ‘wets’ and the ‘dries’ of the LLberal Party.

Last year, in Victorian alone, both the Otways, and the Mitchell River in Gippsland were flooded. Enough water flowed to fill umpteen dams of tremendous scale around Australia. This, that is, before the sheer oceans of water that flooded Queensland and New South Wales and poured out into the huge outdoor toilet pond called the sea. Instead, the Neo-Marxist Bracks and Brumby Cabinets have condemned Victorians to useless water tanks, ‘grey water’, and a desalination plant which is not the $2 to 5 billion, but the truth is$6bto $15b, and that is before compounding.

What is going to happen when the next major drought hits? Ladies and gentlemen, little effort is required to imagine what is in store for us when the next long ‘dry’ hits.

Now, we can see what the criminal force of the actions of politicians (all parties) and bureaucrats, and charltans pretending to be scientist is. Don’t foget, the Greeny propelled DDT band amounted to nothing less than, mass murder. Well, the politicians will have blood on their hands again. That is the morality of such ‘policies’. The “environment” is indeed the cult of death. Yes Kemp, Turnbull, and Campbell, you, as much as the Greens, and the ALP and Peter Garrett, have blood on your hands; that is your morality, the morality of fascist tyrants - the whole lot of them are nothing but lying, criminal, scumbag petty tyrants. (Another reason to expel Victorian Party President David Kemp from the Liberal Party).

[ Having broken posting for a week, I have to, regrettably, resume tomorrow; will also resume trials and tribulations of Jennifer and Peter].