<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The CIS fully supports destructive carbon taxes.</title>
	<link>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/</link>
	<description>Free markets, capital, and entrepreneurs are the bedrock of civilisation.They dragged man out of the gutters,civilised him,dignified him,gave him liberty.Socialism is an excuse to pauperise untold millions,enslave untold millions,murder untold millions, over a century now: Why has the Liberal Party shifted to the code of savages?</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: fossil wallets</title>
		<link>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>fossil wallets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>[...] the Institute of Public Affairs are covering for ???alternative energy?? scams???. His feelings arehttp://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/Oil expert explains demand for reserves The New HampshireStudents, faculty, businessmen and other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the Institute of Public Affairs are covering for ???alternative energy?? scams???. His feelings <a href="arehttp://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/Oil" rel="nofollow">arehttp://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/Oil</a> expert explains demand for reserves The New HampshireStudents, faculty, businessmen and other [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: humphrey enterprises</title>
		<link>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator>humphrey enterprises</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1355</guid>
		<description>[...] ...http://www.timesargus.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080408/SPORTS/804080372/1004/SPORTSThe CIS fully supports destructive carbon taxes.The CIS fully supports destructive carbon taxes. Friday, February 29, 2008 Humphreys took exception [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8230;http://www.timesargus.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080408/SPORTS/804080372/1004/SPORTSThe CIS fully supports destructive carbon taxes.The CIS fully supports destructive carbon taxes. Friday, February 29, 2008 Humphreys took exception [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Bird</title>
		<link>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Humphreys. You are going to have to actually UNDERSTAND what your critics are saying. Its impossible to respond intelligently if you don't even understand your critics. Your tax goes directly against the adaptations we need to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humphreys. You are going to have to actually UNDERSTAND what your critics are saying. Its impossible to respond intelligently if you don&#8217;t even understand your critics. Your tax goes directly against the adaptations we need to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gerry chronicles: carbon tax &#38; bad economics &#171; Thoughts on Freedom</title>
		<link>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gerry chronicles: carbon tax &#38; bad economics &#171; Thoughts on Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>[...] thousands of words in his defence. In particular, there is one obsessed nutter who writes here, here, here and here. As I have been travelling I have been limited to a few quick comments. Until now. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] thousands of words in his defence. In particular, there is one obsessed nutter who writes here, here, here and here. As I have been travelling I have been limited to a few quick comments. Until now. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Humphreys</title>
		<link>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>John Humphreys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>oh... and as I said, I don't mind you being rude, so long as you actually make a point. But you don't.

Try again. Perhaps a few more thousand words should do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh&#8230; and as I said, I don&#8217;t mind you being rude, so long as you actually make a point. But you don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Try again. Perhaps a few more thousand words should do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Humphreys</title>
		<link>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>John Humphreys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>You guys are obsessed.

1. a carbon tax will be bad for the economy

2. the petrol tax is bad for the economy

3. income tax is bad for the economy

Now I have a simple question for you -- which is the worst? If you had to pick two, which two would you pick?

Personally, I think the whole concept of an income tax is quite stupid and I would like to move away from a system of taxing productive work.

If you replace a petrol tax with a carbon tax, then the carbon tax will have economic costs. But the costs previously created by the petrol tax will no longer exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are obsessed.</p>
<p>1. a carbon tax will be bad for the economy</p>
<p>2. the petrol tax is bad for the economy</p>
<p>3. income tax is bad for the economy</p>
<p>Now I have a simple question for you &#8212; which is the worst? If you had to pick two, which two would you pick?</p>
<p>Personally, I think the whole concept of an income tax is quite stupid and I would like to move away from a system of taxing productive work.</p>
<p>If you replace a petrol tax with a carbon tax, then the carbon tax will have economic costs. But the costs previously created by the petrol tax will no longer exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taxes &#187; The CIS fully supports destructive carbon taxes.</title>
		<link>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>Taxes &#187; The CIS fully supports destructive carbon taxes.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>[...] Mangled Thoughts wrote an interesting post today on The CIS fully supports destructive carbon taxes.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt &#8230; limate change’ and to the massive fraud of carbon taxes&#8230;.He and the Centre for Independent Studies are promoting a tax that would override the market’s allocation of resources&#8230;.Humphreys also argues that the tax would be “revenue neutral”. That is totally irrelevant&#8230;.I doubt if you have a clue as to the damage being wreaked by all other taxes -inclusive of regulation on production in Australia&#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Mangled Thoughts wrote an interesting post today on The CIS fully supports destructive carbon taxes.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt &#8230; limate change’ and to the massive fraud of carbon taxes&#8230;.He and the Centre for Independent Studies are promoting a tax that would override the market’s allocation of resources&#8230;.Humphreys also argues that the tax would be “revenue neutral”. That is totally irrelevant&#8230;.I doubt if you have a clue as to the damage being wreaked by all other taxes -inclusive of regulation on production in Australia&#8230;. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strider</title>
		<link>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>Strider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/02/29/the-cis-fully-supports-destructive-carbon-taxes/#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>Hi Douglas.

Excellent work!  Am not sure that I agree on the whole power policy, but I trust your judgement.

We must meet again and drink much beer again soon.

In the meantime, recently raised some governance concerns about the IPA at my blog at the following link:

http://stubbyholder.blogspot.com/2008/02/alan-stockdales-potential-conflict-of.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Douglas.</p>
<p>Excellent work!  Am not sure that I agree on the whole power policy, but I trust your judgement.</p>
<p>We must meet again and drink much beer again soon.</p>
<p>In the meantime, recently raised some governance concerns about the IPA at my blog at the following link:</p>
<p><a href="http://stubbyholder.blogspot.com/2008/02/alan-stockdales-potential-conflict-of.html" rel="nofollow">http://stubbyholder.blogspot.com/2008/02/alan-stockdales-potential-conflict-of.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
