Mangled Thoughts

A carbon tax will sack capital in Australia. There is only one thing to add, and ‘Carbon credits’ and ‘carbon credit trading’ are also taxes. This is so obvious that it shouldn’t need stating but apparently it does.

Penny Wong is one of Kevin “Mussolini” Rudd’s two ministers for voodoo and worship of Mot (an ancient god of death), and she, as the CIS and Humphreys, is deceiving the public. It is deliberate deception, as we now know.

The other minister of ‘watermelon red’ voodoo is Rudd’s prize ‘corrupter of youth’, Peter Garrett, and doyen of the KGB’s pet project in killing off the West, the Green’s ‘movement’. Penny Wong is “wong”:

“The Australian Government does not support the use of a carbon tax,” said a spokeswoman for Climate Change Minister Penny Wong.

That, Wong, is exactly what you are doing, imposing a tax. You, Rudd and the rest of the Cabinet will be immediately culpable for what is a criminal fraud, with devastating consequences. This fact does not let the CIS and Humphreys off the hook at all, since what they are pushing for is the destructive carbon tax.

Having noted Mr. Yates is a beneficiary, as a Director of Peony, Humphreys also profits. Humphreys profits in the form of a pay packet for writing an atrocious paper, repeating the grand lie of man emitted co2 ‘causes global warming’. The lie is nothing but propaganda cover for an incipiently totalitarian policy, and fully endorsed by the CIS; these jokers pretend to be defenders of Liberty.

Humphreys and the CIS are either ignorant or lying about the blunt point; the claim man causes ‘climate change by Co2 emissions’ is a lie. It is not scientifically grounded at all.They compounded their self-satisfied boorishness on this count, just like the IPA, with an atrocious paper destructive of capital and free markets.To this, Jackson has completed his treatment of the mush Humphreys wrote,

Why a carbon tax would hit living standards

On Friday morning, a radio news snippet related, Caltex called for Rudd to impose a carbon tax at 10 cents a litre. I suspected the reason why, but had to wait until Friday evening for the clarification, and I was right. Caltex’s reason is impeccable: Carbon credit trading is a tax, and the Rudd Cabinet should be honest, and face the voters by imposing the tax as a declared tax instead of the euphemism of ‘carbon credits and trading’.

The problem I find with Caltex’s challenge is the failure to proceed further and eviscerate the Cabinet for any type of carbon tax amounts too. Yet, this requires hiring a gun to carry the fight. A gun is not to be fond at the CIS, nor the IPA. There is Gerard Jackson, who on the evidence of his articles and his papers on labour markets can advise them on the real case and what has to be done. I’m not sure if there are any other guns because:

A gun is not to be found at the CIS, nor the IPA. There is Gerard Jackson, who on the
evidence of his articles and his papers on labour markets can advise them on the real case and what has to be done, and how to fight. I’m not sure if there are any other guns because:

The IPA, the CIS, the HR Nicholls Society, Peter Costello and Michael Kroger, and their stick puppets have smeared talent and made sure they never surfaced. They have ensured donors and firms bent on fighting rapacious politicians and bureaucrats are funnelled into their bank
vaults, instead of guns who can do the work.This is why we are facing the highly destructive policies of Kevin “Mussolini” Rudd and the “brownpants” Cabinet.

Well done Humphreys and the CIS. You, like the IPA, and your pals Morgan, Evans and Moore only continue to score victory after victory for the treacherous left. What a pack of useless spongers; this is why they don’t want donors to realise they are paying duds to fire duds, and the reason for their smokesceen - sliming the likes of Jackson.

NB.:
The CIS should be fully scrutinised, in order to establish how great is their conflict of interest in this grievous matter.