Mangled Thoughts

This is the 4th morning since the strong rumour ACTU is defrauding ACTU controlled super funds members was broadcast on Melbourne radio, and the ACTU is frozen silent.This makes things look very bad indeed.

The crux of the charge Sharon Burrows and her fellow henchmen refuses to answer involves major crimes and lesser offences that entails the imminent prospect of the high jump for ACTU bosses before courts, prison sentences and stiff fines to compensate fund members. ASIC, ATO, ACCC, and the Federal police, as continuing searches show, are refusing to act on the information broadcasted by Melbourne radio stations last Friday. Why?

Things might be dirtier than appearances suggest. Sharon Burrows is trampling over unions who are solid against her hard, diseased leftist inclinations. They, and patriotic ALP members are also very disturbed by another of her initiatives, as Andrew Landeryou sets out in, Shazza under seige -

… the organisation’s employment of Greens Party members and symps and other outrages.

This is highly suggestive viz siphoning of super funds into shells set up for nothing less than larceny. Then, there is the ACTU’s undiluted support for fraud called ‘alternative energy’ schemes. But, wait, ‘there’s the bonus offer!’

Former Executive Member of the Queensland State [Public] Service Union, and One Nation MP, Mr. Desmond F. O’Neill wrote a very detailed and interesting letter in 1999 to the then ALP Premier of Queensland, Mr.Peter Beattie. The central matter concerned union officials defrauding members of the Union’s super fund. First, something highly entertaining:

O’Neill commences:

You may recall that I spoke to you about the Heiner Document shredding and the inappropriate operations of the joint QPOA …
and Queensland Professional Credit Union superannuation fund in February 1993…. At the time I spoke to you I pointed out that I knew the March 1990 Cabinet was involved in the Heiner Document shredding…

Then this:

A political journalist advised me that “Tate had put the word around” that if he were to be charged he would “spill the beans on others” (allegedly Mr. Kevin Rudd and Mr. Eric Finger) who Mr. Tate alleged, had done the same as he had done.

A departmental contact also advised me that it was known that Mr. Kevin Rudd had his assistant go through all his expense vouchers for the last two years (prior to 1992) and “cock them up”.

The obvious implication is that the DPP can be leaned on to come up with the desired result. I believe the Connolly/Ryan Inquiry put Mr. Miller’s actions, in regard to this matter, under extreme scrutiny…

In February 1991, I became aware of the Heiner Document shredding and the misuse of the QPOA union superannuation fund and the Kevin Lindeberg sacking circumstances…

Mr. Beattie you may recall that I wrote to you (and Messrs Comben and Santoro) regarding the Treasury Department investigation matter and I am aware that you had contact with the CJC.

By his intimidatory action, Mr. Bradley, has I believe breached several sections of The Criminal Justice Act, 1989 and The Criminal Code of Queensland, Section 140 - Attempting to Pervert Justice.

In other words, it was evident that a fair number of public servants had pledged their loyalty to a political party rather than the Crown. This can be evidenced by their active involvement in covering up the shredding.

I requested and was given a copy of the list, which has become known as the “hit list”.

The last issue I wish to raise is Mr. Goss’s most recent skeleton, which has recently come to light (late January 1999).

Following Mr. Fenwick’s aggressive actions, The Courier Mail decided to revisit the “hit list” and decided to investigate the reference to Mr. Kevin Rudd and the PPR claim against the name of Ms. Jane Macdonnel.

I was put in a very difficult situation in August 1994, when I learnt of the situation whereby Mr. Kevin Rudd and his wife Ms. Therese Rein are alleged to have made a false stamp duty PPR claim in relation to a residence…

The Opposition were aware of the situation (I believe their source was a solicitor who I believe also made contact with Mr. Rudd about the matter shortly after he purchased the property) and there was likelihood that the matter would be raised in the House. At the time I knew the OSR was approximately three months behind in its investigations.

In late October 1994, I reported the circumstances to the Intelligence Officer within the Compliance Audit Branch of the OSR and requested that an investigation file be created.

The house had a room air-conditioner, which was left running 24 hours per day, even though the house was unoccupied. Neighbors complained about the noise from the air conditioning unit running 24 hours per day.

When pursed further regarding the matter Mr. Rudd finally admitted that he did not qualify for the PPR claim and paid the additional stamp duty (about $4500) on 4/11/94 and quoted a receipt number.

During further conversations Mr. Rudd finally stated or words to the effect that “Goss had told him that this disgruntled cunt from the Revenue Office had dobbed him in”. These comments are on tape…

Whilst he did not name me in person, Mr. Rudd was certainly given the details of my OSR dob-in report. The question then exists as to who passed on the information to Mr. Goss. There is not a great choice of suspects.

The normal chain of reporting matters would by via the Under Treasurer. Whist I don’t hold Mr. Bradley in high regard, I don’t think he is that stupid either. Ms. Macdonnel, on the other hand, just can’t contain herself, as I have demonstrated. There are additional facts, which support this view, which I cannot disclose to you.

The fact that the Dilkera Street Property was not owner occupied and sold for a $40,000 profit after being owned for six months also raises the question of capital gains tax.

As you can see, the Heiner case just keeps going on and on and gets worse and worse.

…the fact is that the Heiner issue has never been investigated properly, it has been simply covered up.

The CJC, the Police and Government Departments have acknowledged the seriousness of the situation, as detailed in the leaked Cabinet Submission in February 1995, (Refer to Cabinet Document tabled by Mr. Santoro on 21 February 1995) yet the matters have never been properly investigated.

The document has the notes attached -

c.c. Mr Brendan Butler, Chairman of the CJC.
c.c Ms Julie Dick, Parliamentary Commissioner for the PCJes

It was broadcasted on Melbourne radio a few weeks ago that Penny Wong let loose a string of expletives against senior public servants who dared tell her the truth about Co2 taxation (”it is highly destructive”). Last week, Stephen Smith, Minister for Foreign Affairs, defended Rudd’s use of profanities against staff and not just in their presence. This came after the report of how he keeps the Chief of the Australian Armed Forces, Air Marshall Huston waiting for a few hours, while Rudd admires his gorgeous neo-Mussolini uniform and navel.

Come again, Smith? Abusing public servants for doing their professional duty, and a distinguished commander is o.k.? It looks far worse in view of the above and that taped comment. Try, Mr. Stephen “the nappy cleaner” Smith, try ‘above the law’.

What are the odds of the ACTU being investigated over the unrefuted charge of defrauding members of their savings by siphoning them into ‘alternative energy scams’? This is nothing more than obliterating those funds. Officers of independent savings firms would be investigated and if substantiated, prosecuted under common law, the Companies Act, the Australian Federal Tax Act (yes, there are several volumes dedicated to criminal offences pertaining to super funds alone under the Tax Act), the ACCC Act and the Australian Securities and Investments Act.

Those officers would be slung into prison. So, why are ASIC, ATO, ACCC, and the Federal Police not engaged in an uncompromised investigation into the charges Melbourne Radio stations broadcasted Friday? The ACTU is not above the Rule of Law, even though it has been given some reason to believe it is viz labour market price fixing (Mr. Samuels of the ACCC is for some odd reason loathe to investigate this too).

The matter is grave. Such actions are unlawful. Members of ACTU contolled super funds, given the allegation, are having their savings removed and wiped out in shell ‘companies’.

Also, why does ASIC refuse to investigate those ‘companies’. They are attempting to raise funds from investors, and unawares in the case of members of ACTU super funds (according to the report). If ASIC doesn’t twig onto why they are frauds, how much evidence is required to move them into action but, here’s another article explaining why they are schemes cooked up to cloak commission of larceny against investors, willing or unwilling:

Windpower, union stupidity and green lies, Gerard Jackson

Denmark is one country from whose energy mistakes Australia could certainly learn. It allowed itself to be conned by green fanatics in to diverting masses of scarce capital into building wind farms…

Thanks to the German Government’s compulsory go ‘alternative energy’ fraud, real capital in real energy production has been wiped out and the Germans now pay escalating prices to import electricity from the French. None of the schemes in Europe and North America are real market enterprises, and it is reflected in the frequency of collapses, finally disclosing massive amounts of capital wiped out, massive funds stolen from taxpayers’ and flushed down what are no better than giant, outdoor, uncleaned, toilets. How much plainer does it have to be made before the above bodies act?

To union members, take action and have the books on the ACTU controlled funds opened and make discovery and take the appropriate actions. You might have to prosecute the ACTU bosses, and the Greens, in view of Landeryou’s information, to achieve compensation for having your savings siphoned out of real investments. For right now, it looks like statutory bodies are turning a blind eye to what, according to the reports and not denied by the ACTU, stinks of fraud.

Questions, rather many really, hang over the ACCC, ASIC and the ATO. What a joke, ACCC seeks to break up legitimate companies and actions. The ATO prosecutes and acts on the merest whisper against anyone who dares to protect their property against confiscation by the ATO for the Government. ASIC hammers sound enterprises for not dotting an “i”. However, it seems that when it comes to fraudulent ‘alternative energy schemes’ and the ACTU, they are as frozen as the ACTU is. What are they afraid of? Or, is it political ideology deciding them not to act?

The inaction detailed by Mr. O’Neill in another instance of Union bosses defrauding members of their savings and covered by politicians is telling. So too is, O’Neill’s pinning of Kevin “Mussolini” Rudd. Mr. O’Neill details in his document senior figures, all parties, some Federal politicians such as ALP Senator Mr. Santo Santoro are fully apprised of what he sets out. Where, exactly, when it comes to it, does O’Neill’s case put Mr.Rudd as Prime Minister?

It is time Union members’ funds be removed from ACTU control. they must be run by independent, professional prudent, diligent professionals, who do uphold the trust placed in them and who do ensure funds remain locked against those who have no rights to the funds at all.

Destinations for ACTU fund’s siphoning:

As indicated in the article immediately, below, MacQuarie Bank might be a beneficiary. So also might be “Vic Super”, which proclaims itself to be “the fund for all Victorians” and “invests in clean, green, ethical investments”. It should save the hot air, reduce the blurb to the rubbish it is -’Vic S. serves up its its funds members by wiping out their savings.’

Its C.E.O. quit a week or to ago because of, he reservedly said, “political interference from the Brumby Cabinet”. It begs the question of; for how many years have Bracks and Brumby ‘politically interfered’ with it.

It has been reported, unlike independent funds, Vic Super is set to record another large, absolute loss. This stench requires ruthless investigation, which means of the Cabinet. Then, there is the outstanding matters of the STO and the OPA.