Premier Bracks welcomes economic demolition of Victorians
If it weren’t for the unpleasant fact the Victorian Liberal Party has been throttled by unprincipled,closed, indolent, statists, it is difficult to comprehend how could a couple of ignorant, dumbed down, thugs called Bracks and Brumby have made it onto any frontbench let alone emerge as successive premiers.
They have another thing in common. They were born to successful entrepeneurs for fathers. Unlike their dads, Steve Bracks and John Brumby are merely a pair of institutionalised thickheads, and this sums up the rest of their Cabinets and, sadly, pretty well sums up what sits opposite them. Wealthy, plastic jack-booted brats who don’t have a clue as to how their bread is buttered, and totally incapable of doing it for themselves. Thus, not a few in the “Right” could have said the same as ‘Deah Maximus Premier’:
If John Brumby has to pay a bit more for electricity, the fact of the matter is that John Brumby can afford to pay a bit more for electricity,” Mr Brumby said in an interview with The Sunday Age
Revealing himself once again the economic ignoramus that he is, he continued:
It would also focus on encouraging people to make their homes more energy efficient
Who else has said the same? Mlacolm Turnbull and Kevin Rudd. Effiency means more and not less or, what this lot of fascist cretins are about to do to Australians, delibateratly smash production of energy to smithereens by carbon taxation. Brendan Nelson has arrived at a momentous decision as leader of the Federal Opposition, he will do to Australians in 2012 what Rudd wants to realise by 2010.
On economic efficiency, here’s more corrective reading,
Economics, natural resources and Liberal Party stupidity
The humble light bulb: a victim of political stupidity and green zealotry
Plastic bags v. greenie bigotry
Rudd, Bracks, Brumby, Nelson, Turnbull, et al, have this in common, unlike millions of Australians, they do not expect to suffer a cut in their living standards that will see, at the minimum, their wives screaming at them for being rotten miserable bastards. Rudd declared recently that unlike the mere lumpenmasse, his loved ones will continue to enjoy a mutli-billionaire’s life-style. For some unfathomable reason the name Mao occurs so I’ll tap it in just in case.
Here comes that cunard again sown by the Centre of Independent Studies:
“For lower and middle income families, they will need protection, in varying degrees, from high electricity prices…”
Apart from the contradiction, deliberate sabotage by Executive aimed at cutting power generation, there is no compensation for the smashing of capital in energy production, and none for all companies for which economic supply is crucial. None at all.
A feature of Bracks and Brumby is that their inanities are complemented by infantile expressions:
The Government, he said, would make a huge effort to get Victorians to treat energy with the care with which they treated other important resources
Last week, exscusing his criminal refusal to allow a genuine free martket supplier to build massive dams on the Mitchell, and if required in the Otways, he said:
“Victorians will have to learn to share water…”
Brumby can lead by example and wash his hair in his neighbour’s sewerage water. Unable to help himself, he continued to reel off more lies:
Energy price rises were inevitable with or without an emissions trading scheme, Mr Brumby said, because of global market forces and the rising cost of oil.
It is politicians like him him who have cut oil supply and drove up prices, with a little help with the Feds:
Democrats v. Arctic abundance
(This is apart from all the other recent discoveries)
Oil production: Earth to Nancy Pelosi
Democrats playing (bad) politics with oil
Let Drilling Ring
Oil prices, monetary stability and credit expansion
Commodity prices and inflation — is there a connection?
The truth of the matter is politicians of both major parties, Federal and States’, catering for the Watermelon Red Greens and the diseased Left, are about to wilfully commit a horrendous crime against Australians. Brumby sees nothing wrong with this, but why should he, for he is one of the archtiects of Brackistan.
That Bracks sees nothing wrong in destroying millions of Australians does not make it lawful. Is there any good reason why what Federal and States’ Executives are mounting should not be treated as major criminal actions, matched by the unadulterated police state violence required to ram them down? There is none.
Post a Comment