Mangled Thoughts

Andrew Landeryou has been vindicated in a naked attempt at suppression of speech, his.

The action also had force for many others if it had succeeded. There are a number of points involved that are also central to what one has been relating of the STO, OPA, and VCAT. These are common, grave matters rooted in the increasing lawlessness of the Victorian Executive and how this has been brought about. This is my departure point, and so those who are interested, can read Andrew’s unabridged accounts of the sheer villainous doings rightly condemned.

[Dam, Landeryou is a guy who should be a genuine Liberal -noting some of his instincts are in this direction. The guy also has guts, which cannot be said of the puffball Right, and their CIS and IPA sycophantic yellow lillies.]

The Bracks Blasphemy Act, fully supported by the bludging statists in the Liberal Party, is a major wedge towards suppression of free speech. The Anti-Bill of Rights is another. We have already covered, the Kennett Cabinet and its advisers drew up the 2nd Bill that was Bracks’ perverse pleasure to impose. That, in view of the chronology it is possible the former also drew up the 1st Bill; also Bracks’ sadistic joy to impose.

We have also previously noted, paralytic Federal “Rightwing” MPs have called for censorship of the internet. It is a euphemism for suppression of free speech. Yes, it is exactly what these Liberal Party wreckers mean. Don’t be mistaken about it. On this objective the diseased Left and the comatose Right are loosely aligned. One of their motives irritates them, the power of the Internet.

It hurts them as much as it does the treacherous Left, which is all very pleasing. In fact, this is the pin of the failed attempt to silence Landeryou, launched by the diseased hard Leftist Les Twentyman.

Landeryou exposed Twentyman in all his nastiness. Twentyman is depicted by the usual suspects, hard Left, retarded Right, and a lying media, as making Mother Teresa look like a Mafia plant. Hmmm, Derryn Hinch, praises 5th Columnist Islamo Fascists as truly and ‘roolly’ Australians, smears decent Christians, and sings a thug’s praises.

The Twinkyman is a common thread between the Liberal Party and the ALP. To the shock, and undiluted disgust and anger of not only Landeryou, but also of Genuine Liberals, the myopic tactless Right decided to direct preferences to the gutterman as their grand strategy to defeat an ALP candidate in a by-election.

Twunkman didn’t like Landeryou’s exposure and tried to use the courts to shut him down. It failed, thankgoodness and for all that is decent and uncompromiseable, real rights hard Left and stupid Right are “hell-bent” on wiping out.

Before firing the bullets, here’s a digression:

Digression

Andrew Landeryou is ALP. At times, however, I suspect him of being, at bottom, instinctively genuinely Liberal. This suspicion, sad to say, is overwhelmed by the general run of his commentary. He is firmly, so far, in the ALP. He needs to sort this out, ponder a few things.

Reading his highly entertaining items, one thing is clear, he writes from and for modest Australians, the man in the street. This is something the unctuous, narcissistic ‘Right’ do not so much underestimate as:

They are incapable of fathoming a clue as to why this is so very important. This requires possession of at least one neuron. The suppurating, rotting peanut they share doesn’t cut the ice.

Tack on: They are void in genuinely Liberal principles, and in genuine free market economics, matched by the energy challenged hangers-on they engage to the misery of Liberal Party members and taxpayers advisers. Plus, a serious morality flaw:

They hold modest Australians in thickly ladled contempt. Well, at least this is not as bad as how they treat Liberal Party members.

They consider Statism’ benign’. Some speak of it ‘knowingly’ as the true condition. They are blind to, ‘benign tyranny’ is never so; it always ends in horror. They do not recognise they are merely paid servants and not uber Lords.

They believe voters will obey all that they tell them to do. It shows; they have been blown off the Treasury benches in all Parliaments Federal and States’. It showed again last night, with that good for nothing lawyer aspiring to be dear dictator, Malcolm Turnbull declaring that Brendan Nelson’s Grand Plan “is good for all Australians, and good for the nation”.

End of digression.

Points Addressed

Referring to, Les Twentyman Withdraws Intervention Order Application // Freedom 2 Twentyman 0

1. What due process!

Twentyman was able to corruptly obtain via mates at the Footscray Police a substituted service order for the paperwork for the interim order, which meant we weren’t told about the court hearing at all. Very dodgy indeed.

This is what is done in VCAT as a regular action against victims of the Executive, as we have demonstrated of cases involving those targeted through the OPA and STO.

2. Legalese to fix targets

… Les and his advisers agreed to withdraw his application for an intervention order to silence and attack the OC…These orders are a civil legal instrument designed to stop dangerous psychopaths (of the kind he hangs out with when visiting Northern Ireland) from harming their prey, not to stop journalists from criticising candidates for public office.

Under Acts asserted via STO, OPA and VCAT, victims of the Eexecutive can be totally silenced. Their rights to defend themselves totally shredded. “Orders” of various types are the instruments by which this is done. This lawlessness of the Executive is reinforced by suppression of reporting orders.

3 You find out what has been done to you by the Executive days after it has been done to you.

But for the kind intervention of a local journalist who’d been tipped off about the situation, we might never have known about the application until it was too late.

This is what many hauled through VCAT have endured.

4. Capriciousness

The action against Landeryou was capricious. This is routine, through STO, OPA and VCAT. Targets are brutalised. It is reinforced by admission of hearsay, attempts to corrupt witnesses and other what are in fact offences in Common Law.

5. Fight, but fork out a fortune on top silks.

Maybe not in Landeryou’s case. Faris QC is, on the whole a spirited and energertic QC who fights the right causes. Faris might attend to free market economists such as Mr. Jackson of Brookesnews to arm himself further.

The Executive does its best to bankrupt its victims into submission through STO and OPA and VCAT. Victims to fight to reassert their dignity and rights, and to the extent they can, have to expend a fortune on silks and expert witnesses. It is truly Kafkaesque what they are put through.

Summary remarks.

What Landeryou relates is the inversion of justice to not merely suppress freedom of speech. What is telling about an action that had no merit? This question is bound to, to put it not altogether obliquely, who benefits?

Twentyman, yes, but not simply Twentyman. Look at who the real beneficiaries are in what one has related of the STO, OPA, and VCAT. Then, who look at those responsible for the unforgiveable lawlessness of the Executive, using STO, OPA and VCAT as a smokescreen.

Landeryou has remarked on diseased Leftists in The “Spencer Street” Soviet Age and ALP heavywieghts who are disappointed he wasn’t shut down. Rather telling.

Who are responsible? The irresponsible, statist, arrogant Right who see nothing wrong in shredding real rights, throwing common law down the drain, Lawless Executives, corruption of justice, and linking arms with the diseased Left and Twentyman to get away with it.

Elimination of the right of free speech is a real danger. Don’t forget, the Greens want this too, with making objection to the Lie, Co2 emissions causes global warming, a criminal offence tacked on for good measure.

The stupid “Right” have a lot to answer for. This is why the hard Left are rejoicing, the buffoons destroying the Liberal Party have handed the bastards victory after victory on silver platters, with compliments. How awfully decent of them.