Mangled Thoughts

The Nazis were devoted to the cult of nature and to it equated man and animals. They banned vivisections on animals. They had the Jewish people to experiment on.

Peter Singer equates animals with man and holds, to repeat the ‘right to life’ is decided by whether anyone is a ‘person’. By this rubbery word, ‘person’, he includes animals. Singer holds some have less ‘rights’ to live than piglets. That, State ordered murder of some is moral. Singer totally evades rights are grounded in property, including onself. There is a reason for this.

Singer’s notion of ‘rights’ has nothing to do with real rights and freedom, it has everything to do with justifying absolutism. The UN’s position is the same, the incipiently totalitarian definition of Rights. It must not be forgotten that:

In 1920 Permission to Destroy Life Unworthy of Life was published in Germany. Authored by a Professor Karl Binding in collaboration with Dr Alfred Hoche, the book categorised those who were to be killed…

Hoche and Binding’s ideas became respectable in Weimar Germany and provided the Nazi’s with the intellectual reasoning for their war of extermination against the senile, the retarded, the disabled, etc. And it was the Churches that stood up against this tide of barbarism, not leftwing journalists.

in [Singer’s] own words: “What the Nazis did was a totally different thing. They called their program euthanasia but it was not euthanasia because it was not for the good of the infants involved.”
But murdering people for their own good was part of the Nazi euthanasia program, as Hitler’s decree of the 1 September 1939 authorising euthanasia made clear:
“Reichleiter Bouhler and Dr Brandt are hereby instructed to extend the authority of physicians designated by name in such a manner that those… as it is humanly possible to judge, incurably sick may, after the most scrupulous assessment of their state of health, be granted a merciful death.”
The Nazis argued that society had a moral obligation to relieve parents of the suffering and distress that severely handicapped children imposed on them. This statement destroys Singer’s criticism…

Singer was run out of German Universities, and was opposed by undergraduates of Harvard who are also cripples.

Singer “publicly lamented the collapse of socialism (communism), once again revealing the greens’ socialist ideology.” This quote is from an article that includes other telling quotes and something else; the unprincipled, camotose, cowardly “Right” and spineless company directors and executives who see nothing wrong with the Greens’ cult of death. Another quote is apt:

Speaking for the German greens, Carl Amery stated:

We, in the green movement, aspire to a cultural model in which the killing of a forest will be considered more contemptible and more criminal than the sale of 6-year old children to Asian brothels. (Ibid., p. 169).

Mining Industry Caves in to Fanatical Greens

Regarding the Leftist front, Animals Australia, with others in suuport such as the Parkville, Melbourne based, “The Australian Catholic Study Circle for Animal Welfare”, their position is transparent - the force is unmistakeable. Equating piglets and children is not simply that children are the same as piglets. Children can be ‘legally murdered’. Those behind these fronts will deny it but, it is true.

The Animals Australia media campaign combines the above with another violent, direct abuse of children. It is aimed at getting at adults through children too, by the naked attempt to induce children to identify with piglets, and regard them as human too, while seeking to induce adults to view their children the same way.

Yes, this item recapitulates some points made in When advertising is propganda. Not, however, the full savagery of this disgusting propaganda and brainwashing effort. Yes, brainwashing - to manipulate those who listen to it, and see it on TV and in papers in to the above moral equivalence and into accepting their totalitarian lies as true.

Man is unique, and above all animals. This is what the diseased Left, including their pals who have penetrated the Church, are attacking, and supplanting with notions that are horrendous. Several things stand out:

1.The advertising agency responsible for producing Animals Australia’s propaganda campaign saw nothing wrong with it.
2. Media Companies saw nothing wrong with it in accepting the contract to transmit it.

The media companies did not react until they were flooded by complaints from the public. Then, only then did, it seems (I could be wrong on this - eg., is it still running on TV) have they pullede it.

The 3rd thing is, neither has the “Right” seen anything wrong with it. They have been a complete blank, matched by dumbness - total silence. Then, too many of them, beginning with Brendan Nelson, equate man with animals. So do the CIS and IPA - regulation and tax as the coercive measures to force people to behave the right way, the Watson position holding man as nothing but animals to be beaten and driven.

Truly disgusting. Another typical failure of the necrotic “Right”. Abysmal, truly appalling.

Cardinal Archbishop George Pell, concerned Catholics have mentioned whether you will investigate and take action against “The Australian Catholic Study Circle for Animal Welfare”? I happily agreed to mentioning the request in public. This treacherous, child abusing, diseased Leftist front is using the cover of the Church to push a position that is horrendous, and forget anti-Catholic, it is not even Christian. In the name of Christ, Trinity, and Church Cardinal! Enough reason to act, Sir.