The diseased Left, control and power

The only freedom the diseased Left defends is theirs. Other than this, it is control and subjection of everyone else. Not for them living according to their cultic beliefs and trusting that if they are onto a good thing others will imitate them volitionally. Well, they are nothing more than totalitarians. One of their major tactics to achieve what they aim at is the ‘take-over merchant’ tactic. The Church, a case study.

A lady related that as a teenager in the 1950’s she and her friends of a parish worked weekends, and held fundraisers in order to purchase a restorer’s dream, a run down weatherboard building. It had its good side, a pleasant seaside location. After the purchase, they raised more funds to pay for the renovations. On weekends and term breaks, they travelled to the site and, under local tradesmen laboured on the building. Their motivation? They did it to provide holidays for children of destitute parents who could not even afford to send their children away for a break. Don’t forget, Australia was deep in depression.

At the end of their last, weeklong effort of applying finishing touches, they held a barbecue to celebrate the new resort for children of the destitute. To their surprise, a cadre of twenty somethings turned up, in the name of their denomination, in time to party. These ‘blow-ins’, were as foreign to the Parish as they were to the work on the building. They helped themselves to the barbecue, the drink and started bossing the teenagers about in their own party. They held an unctuous prayer session at the end. The 20 somethings had a last trick up their sleeve. They concluded the damped celebrations by informing the Christians they were taking control of the holiday house and the teenagers “’were no longer needed”.

Neither were children of destitute parents, who might have enjoyed the vacation retreat. The 20 somethings used it for themselves. Who were these “holy Joes”? They were a new generation of diseased Leftists, who were infiltrating the Church, albeit a Protestant Church.

They were not old Marxists. They were the first of the emerging neo-Marxists. It’s an anecdote but sums up the institutional march of the Left. This and everything the diseased Left touches is poisoned and burned to stinking rubble. They seize control of what is good, spit on those who made it good, and destroy it beyond recognition. The Church has not been immune to the march of the diseased Left.

“The Australian Catholic Study Circle for Animal Welfare”, mentioned in two items below is only another minor outbreak of these parasites. What developed during the 1960’s has been nothing less than an internal war with the diseased Left. The problem for decent orthodox Christians is it has been fought out institutionally, and still is. There has been bad theological grip that has only conceded ground. Secondly, ignorance in other fields, the deadliest being economics. It shows. For now, we draw this out by what is certainly not a minor demonstration, the Society of St. Vincent de Paul.

In the late 1980’s to early 1990’s, the neo-Marxist 5th column completed their take-over of the Society of Vincent Paul with genuinely pious, Catholic, charitable members and non-members were shocked by their thuggery, but passed over the treachery in silence.

Once the Head office had been stuffed with the walking dead, things were changed swiftly. As an example, the kommissars expended funds on printing literature for use in the chapters of the Society. Neo-Marxist indoctrination literature, and written in the Dick and Dora grasp of English for good measure. This in itself is typical of how the diseased Left regard others, in undisguised contempt.

To check, their website is page to page neo-Marxist propaganda. The section titled,”Ethics” (ethics schmethics), is headed by assertion of the lie Co2 emissions causes global warming:

Ethics and climate changeOur moral obligation to take climate change seriously

Quoted is guru Flannery,

Climate change could also cause the extinction of one third of the species of the planet. According to Tim Flannery…

Besides fraud in science, statements such as these are to the point:

Behind these figures lies not just the death of possibly hundreds of millions of people

One of the first ethical principles is identifying those who are responsible for the damage caused by climate change. This principle states that a nation cannot use the excuse of minimising the cost to its own economy as an ethically acceptable excuse for failing to take action on greenhouse gas emissions that affect the whole planet.

Rich countries, which are mainly responsible for releasing
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere over the past 200 years, are obliged to pay compensation for climate change damages that are unavoidable. In a spirit of global solidarity they are also
morally bound to make resources and new technologies available to poor communities so that these countries…

Petrochemical corporations, especially Exxon-Mobile, have played
a very negative role in trying to pretendnthat climate change is not due to burning fossil fuel. Once again this excuse
transgresses basic ethical norms. When there is a possibility that activity, in this…

The only truthful point made is the great lies impact of Co2 on climate and it is a “pollutant”, is the objective behind the rush to controls, to undermine free market, capitalist west. The destitute, why they are destitute, and those living under brutal regimes are not the object of this unpious trash. The objective is, the West should be reduced to the squalor of hell holes on earth too. This piece of disgusting, shallow, false piety is an obscene insult to genuine Christians, and encapsulates the mendacity of the Leftist dictators at the helm of the Society:

know that climate change will have a terrible impact on the poor, the very people who did least to cause the problem in the first place. In the Magnificat, Mary tells us that God’s mercy reaches from age to age for those who fear him (Lk 1:50)….

Going back to the Religion Report interview for a moment, the intrepid Stephen Crittenden continued with his questions. He asked: “Would there be any need for those volunteers (referring to the members of the St Vincent de Paul Society) if Australia was a fair and just society?”

What sets them apart is the inequality of resources allocated to them by our society. Because we choose to stand in solidarity
with our sisters and brothers who have been pushed to the edge we come face to face with degradation and yet we are driven by a seemingly hopeless hope.

Where injustice, inequity, poverty or exclusion are due to inadequate or unjust legislation, the Society is required to speak out clearly against the situation.

It is common place for poor people to be treated badly by most business people.

The response required for this type of problem is not simple. It is a very complex one. It is not food, money, direction or
criticism. In some cases it would require a radical change to some of our social structures.

In today’s society there appears to be an economic monopoly which aims to become richer to the detriment of the
poor.

All politicians must strive to manage state affairs for the common good of all, which in itself demands a service in truth.

In asking the simple question about the causes of injustice we issue a prophetic call to all people of good will to work creatively to build equality and justice into our society.
The accumulation of wealth on the one hand is connected with the accumulation of poverty on the other, characterized by race, gender, age, disability, mental and physical illness, forced migration, homelessness, unemployment, insecure and poorly paid work and declining levels of social security and public infrastructure.

Here is someone else who is fed up with their neo-Marxist ‘clap-trap’:

The Society of St Vincent de Paul’s Marxist claptrap and its attack on the free market

He makes the same observation on the diseased Left’s favourite tactic -

There seems to be a law of the universe that states that any so-called independent organization whose existence can be used to attack capitalism will be eventually captured by the left and put to that purpose. The Catholic the Society of St Vincent de Paul seems to be striking proof of the existence of this law…

Regardless of what Marxist cultists at the Society of St Vincent de Paul would have people believe…

The economic savagery the cretins who control the Society claim is further illuminated by, for example, this by Augusto Zimmermann:

The Church is keeping Marx alive in Brazil and undermining the rule of law

The neo-Marxist bruvver-sistahood are parasites. They are not Christians at all. They have merely redefined the Christian confession into an anti-christian idolatary of totalitarianism. What they have done is totally debase the Society, having converted it into a Vehicle for themselves and their vile aims. Be sure of it, individuals, the genuinely destitute, and those enduring Stalinist and Islamo-fascist hell are mere inconvenient facts. Also inconvenient facts to this lot of liars is the immutable laws of economics they happily violate, not simply out of ignorance, but out of contemplation of the hell they desire be unflicted on Australians and millions around the world.

Again, the supine and stumped bungling “Right” are at a total loss as to what such types are really about, and how to fight them. Sadly, so are genuinely apostolic clergy - but this is because they are not intellectually armed at all.

Comments (2) to “The diseased Left, control and power”

  1. […] C.A.R.D wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe accumulation of wealth on the one hand is connected with the accumulation of poverty on the other, characterized by race, gender, age, disability, mental and p… […]

  2. […] Original Mangled Thoughts […]

Post a Comment
(Never published)
 

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image