Andrew Bolt has no bolts
One of Bolt’s latest stunners is
Samuel, not Pratt, is the Jewish hero
Pratt is a Pratt, but for reasons entirely lost on Bolt. However, Pratt is not a criminal. “Legal” does not = lawful, contrary to the greatest jurist on earth, Peter Costello. It is not, contrary to Bolt, a “criminal issue” at all. Pratt has committed no crime at all, irrespective of Samuel and the ACCC.
Bolt’s problem is, aside from legalese, he is a void in economics and much else besides. This, the economic deficiency, will be taken up next week.
For now, all that one will remark is:
1. Bolt’s item is sanctimonious rubbish.
2. While the root matter is not, as Andrew Bolt declares, “a Jewish issue, it in fact is and here is why:
Jews are supersensitive and for good reason. Hatred of Jews is increasing in Australia. There is background to the troubles Jews take to ensure no offence is caused, and what I allude to I have not yet written on. The disturbing list of names of the spastic “Right” shows hatred of the Jews isn’t a diseased Left affliction only. I have some cases up my sleeve.
When Bolt sneers that Samuel is ‘cold-shouldered’ by Jews he made another bad mistake. They are right to do so and on several counts. Reputation counts and Pratt has been slandered; he is not a criminal. “Legalese” has been the mechanism to smear him.
Secondly, Bolt asserts the rotten collectivist rubbish of community. It ryhmes with the vapid noise cows make - comoooonity. According to Bolt, those criticising Samuel are vile because they are making, and this is the sociologicalitis b.s. sense of it, the sod feel ‘unvalued’ and ‘alienated’ - ‘ostracised’ from the ‘Jewish collective’.
Bolt has never witnessed leave alone engaged in debate with Jews, on Torah. I have, on both counts. Those who know know what a robust, young and old, male and female, free for all even this innocuous past-time is.
Andrew Bolt in his good “Rightwing” approved form, makes sure the universal peanut they share for a brain is switched off at his node, as they each do, and then speaks, as they each do, in their tried and true technique, the self-incineration way. Very stylish.
It is bad what he wrote. What else is to be expected? This, readers, we pick up Monday.
.
Post a Comment