Comments on: Centre for Independent Studies are lobbyists? http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/08/20/centre-for-independent-studies-are-lobbyists/ Free markets, capital, and entrepreneurs are the bedrock of civilisation.They dragged man out of the gutters,civilised him,dignified him,gave him liberty.Socialism is an excuse to pauperise untold millions,enslave untold millions,murder untold millions, over a century now: Why has the Liberal Party shifted to the code of savages? Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:21:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Graeme Bird http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/08/20/centre-for-independent-studies-are-lobbyists/#comment-1513 Graeme Bird Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:31:24 +0000 http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/08/20/centre-for-independent-studies-are-lobbyists/#comment-1513 For one thing Davidson is probably too ignorant of economics to understand the debate. For one thing Davidson is probably too ignorant of economics to understand the debate.

]]> By: Ess http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/08/20/centre-for-independent-studies-are-lobbyists/#comment-1503 Ess Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:17:26 +0000 http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/08/20/centre-for-independent-studies-are-lobbyists/#comment-1503 Why don't you challenge Davidson to a debate in the open? Flush him out. Why don’t you challenge Davidson to a debate in the open? Flush him out.

]]> By: Ess http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/08/20/centre-for-independent-studies-are-lobbyists/#comment-1498 Ess Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:06:12 +0000 http://rumcorps.net/mangledthoughts/2008/08/20/centre-for-independent-studies-are-lobbyists/#comment-1498 See what else Davidson says about you. <blockquote>As regards your friend Mr Jackson, all I want to say is that he has no professional qualifications, no professional affiliations and no professional publications. He is, at best, a gifted amateur - and a fine amateur he is too. His responce to Humphreys was unacceptably poor - reflecting his amateur status - and his spear-carriers have further undermined his previously good reputation as a commentator by their siliness.</blockquote> http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2008/07/20/why-is-wind-power-suddenly-doable/#comment-16389 See what else Davidson says about you.

As regards your friend Mr Jackson, all I want to say is that he has no professional qualifications, no professional affiliations and no professional publications. He is, at best, a gifted amateur - and a fine amateur he is too. His responce to Humphreys was unacceptably poor - reflecting his amateur status - and his spear-carriers have further undermined his previously good reputation as a commentator by their siliness.

http://graemebird.wordpress.com/2008/07/20/why-is-wind-power-suddenly-doable/#comment-16389

]]>