Mangled Thoughts

Greg Lindsay and his Centre for Independent Studies are having a major breakdown. It’s sad really, they are ruining their comfy clubrooms. Good and they brought it upon themselves.

What has tipped them over the edge from their ususal whining, stamping their feet, screaming and sobbing, is obvious. Exposure for what they stand for and are through the looking glass of their full support and lobbying for the economic destruction of Australians through Co2 taxes. They tipped themselves over the edge the day they crossed the line and became lobbyists for larcenous parasites.

It must be repeated that these actions, including of those paying for the campaign, entails violations of the tax. Violations carry prison sentences. It is easy to spot, so it can be safely assumed the ATO have. Targets usually discover the ATO are after them only when they are hauled before a judge and sentenced to the University of Criminals.

Bye the bye, the Business Council of Australia has broken ranks with the Right’s clunker tanks CIS and IPA. They probably threw Hugh Morgan overboard too, noting Hugh ‘the WMC atomic bomb’ Morgan, and Ron ‘the lurching Ronnie’ Walker also hope to make squillions out of Co2 tax destruction day (these two are consistent). This morning the BCA came out and declared, ‘Carbon taxes will destroy companies Australia wide.’ I suppose the CIS could try to tell the BCA Co2 taxes are ‘costless’, if they fancy having their heads torn off.

Greg Lindsay and the CIS are twisted, as well as brainless, to deny science and economics in the fight against Co2 taxes and the excuse for it, the diseased Greens’ lies. Malicious also in smearing those who had the hide to point out what is wrong with their position. Abandonment by the BCA adds a comic touch. The deranged entombed in their clubrooms they soaked donors mulit-millions for.

It might be a lonely feeling, publicly exposure for intellectual fraud in economics and science. Shame, however, doesn’t disturb them. This, shame, however, doesn’t disturb them.

It is a mixture of hubris, resentment, bitterness, schizophrenia, anger, and thwarted venality, that shows out. To cap it off, the ATO breathing down their necks. This is a recipe for a hideous, tremendous breakdown and the CIS and Greg Lindsay are full of it. So are the IPA and the HR Nicholls Society in all but the ATO respects. Consequently, Lindsay blew the bottom of the barrel to find Humphreys to do his dirty work on Co2 taxes. And, dredged up a troll club, Catallaxy and the ALS, to make him and the CIS feel important, good, loved, and to mount a non-existent defence.

They, the troll club, are the same as diseased Leftists Quiggin and Lambert and their trolls. They wield rubber knives and use them, fishwives blowing bubbles and sticking their tongues out on various sites. Why, we have been treated to another titbit of little girls training to be vicious fishwives in action, Ess and.

Not, though, to grumble. To the contrary, they have delivered a pleasant surprise. These guys go out to what they call hunting and stab their noses every time. Lindsay and the CIS are in the middle of a very big crack up to rely on clowns like these hissing ‘poody cats’.

Ess has kindly comments by the good Professor Sinclair Davidson. What backstabbing, snide remarks Davidson has fathomed this time? Are they his typical raspberries or a truly ingeniously infantile chunder? What a surprise.

Davidson, a-typically, has finally acknowledged Mr. Jackson’s superiority in economics, though snidely, smearingly, grudgingly conceded as his statement shows:

“he has no professional qualifications, no professional affiliations and no professional publications. He is, at best, a gifted amateur - and a fine amateur he is too.”

Firstly, though unable to say what degree, it is certain from his articles Jackson went up to University and read economics.It is also obvious he didn’t stop there, and became the fine economist he is today. He is recognised internationally as theoretician and leading exponent of Austrian school economics. In addition the ACTU acknowledges Jackson is formidable and this is why they fear him, unlike the clowns in the clunk tanks. The ILO hold Jackson is essential reading. But wait, there’s more recognition:

Economists I correspond with and since Sinker ‘the sinking man’ Davidson is impressed by credentialism, they have Phds, are forthright about Jackson’s work, the esteem it and him too. I have met others in very serious positions, and the uncanny thing is they have all remarked they find him incisive:

“Jackson has an uncanny ability to get to the heart of a matter…”

And sort it out accurately and swiftly. Indeed he is, as this example shows:

Liberal Government and labour market reform: more fallacious attacks

It is as well to recollect seminal advances in theory were made by men without degrees and those with but not in economics. Keynes produced his poison having expended all of a single term of lectures in economics.

It is awfully decent of Sinclair Davidson to concede Jackson is intellectually formidable in economics. It is rare for amateurs, no matter how brilliant, to lead in a field. It takes work, application, matched by depth and breadth, virtues the CIS, IPA and HR Nicholls are devoid of - and these crippling defects have been remarked on by very serious people I am acquainted with. They are virtues Jackson is fully possessed of, as his work shows.

Still unable to help himself, Sinclair threw this gem in:

“His response to Humphreys was unacceptably poor - reflecting his amateur status…”

What’s the matter, Sinkers? Upset stomach over Jackson demolishing the CIS pack of lies, put through Humphreys, effortlessly, from Austrian capital theory? If, as you say, it is ‘poor’, then you must demonstrate why, in public. It wouldn’t be a surprise if Jackson let you publish a rebuttal on Brookesnews on where Jackson’s analysis is wrong. He’s let others reply on his site (only to demolish them all over again).

It is clear why Professor ‘Sinkers’ Sinclair won’t confront Jackson directly. It’s called cowardice. All that is seen of Sinkers is him running around sites doing nothing but trying to damage Jackson’s reputation as an economist. What sort of “Professor” does this, sacrificing truth and honesty with it?

Sinclair then writes:

“his spear-carriers have further undermined his previously good reputation as a commentator by their silliness.”

Smears, now lies. I, for one, have not met Jackson. My attack on, for example, Co2 taxation and the disgusting CIS fraud, has melded Austrian economics and case studies. This is a different approach to Jackson’s, who is arguing strictly from within solid economic theory.

He happens to also bring it to bear for the benefit of the public in his articles. The HR Nicholls Society, IPA, and CIS are such cowards they even refuse to account for themselves to the man in the street. They run away. Instead, they lickthe boots of the diseased Left dominated media, put risible ’submissions’ to Parliamentary Committees and unheard outside, and which in sum state “We are here to see Australians drink all the arsenic the government can pump out.’ This is a very strange notion of fighting the Left and advancing good causes.

Then, this lot cannot fight good causes. They destroyed the campaign for labour market reform. They discredit the free market cause in general, effortlessly. They claim to be experts on Hayek and show how illiterate they are on Hayek and perforce the Austrian school.

As for Humphreys, he is on the same wavelength as Andrew Andy Pandy Kemp and Chris the Castroingo Kid, pulseless. The CIS-Humphreys paper is as excruciatingly bad as the garbage pumped out by these two unfused bulbs. Indeed, the only reason why I bothered with the Humphreys paper is that it is the CIS position and spring for its lobby campaign.

Jackson’s treatment of the lobby paper was, in my books, extremely generous to a pack of thugs acting as lobbyists for a pack of bastards. A pack of gibbering soakers who give a stuff about destroying Australians through carbon taxation.

In his feeble efforts to defend the CIS, Davidson smeared Jackson. However what does it disclose about this ‘good professor’ that he defends the intellectually indefensible, and a crew of larcenous parasites who don’t give a stuff about destroying Australians? Davidson’s concern for poor Humpers is inverted morality.

Hmmm, to check again, if Jackson were a mere amateur, besides his mastery of theory, how could Jackson have delivered a thorough demolition of the Berg-Kemp pack of flies called “Islam and the Free Market”, in an excellent survey of the history of economic thought? Oh, this still hurts Davidson, and given that one also ripped into Berg-Kemp, I enjoyed demolishing it all over again when these bright sparks proceeded to make the same claim about the history of philosophy and theology. It was unforgettable reading Sinclair pleading to Amir to never refer to it again.

Now, I simply cannot help myself, but I recall a Sinclair Davidson – Castroingo Kid Berg paper. The measure of how bad it is distilled in one superficial sentence declaring production is nothing more than ‘making things’, mere little home cottage industry that won’t be missed if wiped out. In this paper, they pressed again the demand for destruction through Co2 taxation.

We have a real problem today, the fascist Kevin Rudd Cabinet and it’s lust for central planning. The Davidson –Berg reflects why, over the decades, the ignorant Right have caused great damage and paved the way for Kevin Rudd and his fascist gangsters. Then, there is Jackson’s demolition of that junk.

That is the best Greg Lindsay and the Centre for Independent Studies can manage in their defence? Whining fishwives wielding plastic knives behind the backs of their betters? Who else would be stupid enough, apart from the diseased Left, to go into bat for measures that will destroy Australians and Australia? Right now, it is Rudd and his Cabinet of fascists and the treacherous Left who love these bastards. In the meant-time, how is the lobby business looking now, Greg Lindsay?

That’s it for this week. Concentrating on the CIS this week has been no indulgence. The reasons why are glaringly obvious. Not that we shall desist. To the contrary, we will stitch them up again next week when attending to other matters, such as Kevin Rudd’s lust for grand central planning, and how this pack of psychopathic morons found themselves in Government.

To Anon, not forgotten next response to your last. Will also put it up next week.

Happy weekend Lindsay.