Mangled Thoughts

“This happy band” of wreckers destroying grave causes.

Time is up, Professor Sinclair Davidson

He has not published a paper defending the Centre for Independent Studieslobbying for Co2 taxation. He has not published a defence of his and his chums anti-intellectual belief in the fiction of ‘perfect competition’. The reason is transparent; he cannot defend a shred of them.

Failing to deliver on these challenges is also a complete refusal to engage in open debate. This is a contradictory position for him, the Centre for Independent Studies, Institute of Public Affairs, and, indeed, the HR Nicholls Society. After all, they claim to be engaged in public debate. That they scurry around energetically killing debate is a very odd notion of it.

This leaves only what remains his duty. No doubt he will refuse to do this too. That is, repair some of the great damage he is also culpable for. Also, give unqualified apologies to those whom he has smeared, and give rectifying explanations to all before whom Davidson and also his chums in the Centre for Independent Studies, Institute of Public Affairs, and the HR Nicholls Society have smeared.

Never mind, for here is something telling:

It is amusing that Davidson and his plinky plunk anti-free market tinkerbell tanks chums have wasted no opportunity to damage Jackson’s reputation as an economist. Having mentioned that this fine economist has high international standing, while googling for material on money, the search threw up something very interesting.

Jackson’s articles are carried in US business and investment magazines. Jackson is heavyweight read by heavyeights and a measure that he is a must read is, the following also publish him:

Newsweek, the National Examiner, Folio Magazine, Chicago News, and the Washington Times.

Readers can check here and here.

Why the search? Unlike Australia, there is a real debate raging in America, and it turns on sound money and sound economic theory of money against kenyesianitis. This debate is occurring against the background of the Presidential race, and the dawning realisation of the great threat Obama and the Stalinist Democrats presents to the United States in many great matters. And, a dawning realisation that the only way through these dangers is solidly founded and driven debate.

In Australia, there is nothing. The venal “Right” are guilty of this. They do not merely refuse to debate. They will not debate and because, to give an honest assessment of this lot of moral cowards, they know the Left would publicly smash them, and so would genuine Liberals. Both of these treacherous wreckers of Australia also know Jackson can single-handedly smash them.

Why, however, have the Right strangled debate? Their death grip over the Liberal Party is one reason. Their plunky dunk tunks another. The common denominator is themselves and the unearned fat pay checks they collect from donors. To check:

Consider what would happen to Centre for Independent Studies, and the Institute of Public Affairs? They would fold. These are Greg Lindsay’s super fund, and the Kemp family’s cash box and dole office for Andrew “Andy Pandy” Kemp and Chris “the Castroingo Kid” Berg.

Once exposed, donors would stop siphoning millions of dollars into their bank vaults. Not all donors; those paying the Centre for Independent Studies to lobby for what they hope for:

To make squillions out of the total economic destruction of Australia through Co2 taxes. And, while I mention it, I will publish an interesting transcript tomorrow -

The ALP has set out before Parliament more of its central planning aims to destroy Australians. They include provisions for imposition of Co2 taxes which follow exactly what the Centre for Independent Studies prescibes must be done to Australians.

This, the destruction of Australia, Professor Sinclair Davidson has defended and smeared those who demolished the position for what it is: built on a fabric of mush glued together with lies and betraying Australians to the Fascist Rudd Cabinet.

An observation:

How bad is Professor Sinclair Davidson’s efforts in economics?

Jackson demolished every fallacy in his IPA “paper” with Chris “the Castroingo Kid” Berg,

Thumping the Table: Key Questions for the Labor Party’s ‘Industry Policy’

Telling is the funniest and most devestating criticism delievered : I appreciated on reading Jackson’s article, if the J curve is true, then, Davidson, why isn’t its reverse? This single point alone totally demolished the article.

Is monetary policy destroying the country’s manufacturing base? Gerard Jackson (17/03/08).

The clear concern in the paper is not simply the damage money creation (which is inflation) does. The concern is, the capital structure in Australia is smaller than many assume. It is worth observing, the man in the street was disturbed by then, it now litters daily speech.

Secondly, it is plain that Jackson is working within a framework of relative prices. Davidson does not. He works from aggregates.

Has Davidson rectified his defective economics? No, and insouciantly has recently done his best again to damage what is now an ominous danger, collapse of manufacturing. While the Rudd Cabinet is racing down the road of Central Planning, Davidson manages to trivialise it as a game of roulette, the ‘government picking winners’,

Bracks report doesn’t stray far from script
The Age 15th August, 2008

Bye the bye, the ‘Bracks Report’ is shocking in force, and I can assure Davidson that heavyweights I am acquainted with in the City are also more than disturbed by it and what Rudd’s Cabinet is ramming down, central planning. The Rudd Cabinet has to be fought and hurt and stopped, and what does Davidson and the IPA do, gives Kim “Il” Carr a free ride and boy does this thug have a lot to laugh about:

The ALP kicked Liberal Party MPs’ heads in today over manufacturing. I’ll post a few ripe examples. Who advises them, apart from Lawyers and family and friends? The Centre for Independent Studies, and Institute of Public Affairs, that’s who.

I remind readers, Davidson and Berg in,Thumping the Table…, dismissed manufacturing as nothing more than a trivial home cottage knitting needle exercise and then called for the demolition of manufacturing through the destruction of coal based energy companies and all dependent on economically efficient supply of energy.

Australia is in real peril because of what the blindingly stupid Right has flung into Office, Rudd and co. What does the IPA do Institute of Public Affairs? It does what it and the Centre for Independent Studies, always do well, fires duds that only gives joy to the diseased Left.

This man, Professor Sinclair Davidson, has the hide to smear economists of the calibre of Jackson, while defending the CIS’s lobbying for Co2 taxes, a putsch to see Australians destroyed, and himself publishing limp, error shot items?! He’s worse than an a coward.

NB
Having read economics at undergraduate level, years ago, that did not make me an economist. It did point me in some directions which I attend to and by concentrating on fine economists and one of them happens to be Jackson’s work. I mention this only because it is so very important to the myopic Right, ‘credentialism’ that is - in view of the above.

Hmmm: The tin-eared Right never escaped their undergraduate days. They are still stuck in their textbooks built on the quicksand of perfect competition.