Mangled Thoughts

The usage ‘Executive(s)’ is for what is falsely called ‘government’.

The actions of Belinda Neal, her husband John Della Bosca, and other ALP thugs against the sacked staff and against their former employer the Iguana Club illustrates the increasing lawlessness of the Executives – local councils, State’s administrations and the Federal Administration. It is only the tip of the iceberg, as the larcenous actions of the Victorian STO and OPA, and ‘Heinergate’ in Queensland shows. How has this situation come about? The answer is swift and telling.

Regulation is not the rule of (common) Law. It is the capricious diktat of increasingly tyrannical politicians and bureaucrats. It is reinforced by increasing numbers of judges that are not learned in common law at all, and others who, whether they are or are not learned in law, despise it and willingly use their offices as judges to entrench the rule of increasingly overt tyrants in the making. Unlike Judges under the Nazis and Communist regimes, these types will not stand up to thugs; observing the only way tough judges could be done in was sacking them, gaoling them, and shooting them. The Rudd Fascist Cabinet and what it plans to do to Australians is another shocking indication of what is no mere disturbing hint of a trend. It is transparent and far down the road to - call a spade a spade, totalitarianism, the real end of socialism. As an aside:

I still boggle at orthodox clergy, forget the diseased Leftists white-anting the Church, who hold socialism is Christian, and that to be a Christian means being a socialist. What these dumbkopfs don’t realise is :

1. Socialism is anti-Christian.

2. To redefine the content of the Christian faith as socialism is to evacuate the content of this Confession for the anti-Christian cult of socialism.

3. It is a sacralising of a highly destructive cult.

4. It is a rejection of truth, which right from the Apostolic Age the Church Catholic rejected as the position of barbarians and worse. In apologetics, Fathers of the Church took pains to explain to Greek and Roman that the Church is committed to truth in all things. It showed; the Church was, for example, committed to truth in economics and thus not only did Fathers engage in the quest for truth in economics, exemplified by the Scholastics. It is why the Church condemned, for example, Francis of Assissi (!).

5. It is a complete and grotesque contradiction of a central tenet, Christian faith is a volitional act of the individual not simply as a response to grace, but also as was hammered out through the long development of doctrine, in particular the pins Christ and Trinity, as strictly volitional action in communicatio between the individual and Trinity.

What these orthodox clerics are successfully doing, in effectively proclaiming socialism is Christianity, is not only propagating very grave theological errors but are doing rotten work that benefits the diseased Left only.

It might also be observed, and it’s an amusing point at that, if socialism is Christianity fulfilled on earth, then clerics have no reason to complain of still emptying pews. Why should anyone attend Chuuch at all! Socialism is heaven. Why are not Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, Soviet Union, Communist Cuba, Maoist China, considered the most splendid realisations of Christian faith? By definition, those terror regimes must be the epitome of Christianity, its perfection.

The diseased Left hanker to subject Australians to an Australian version of these splendid, all lightness and truth, Apostolic regimes. Stupid orthodox clerics are helping them to it. Ah, I have overlooked one thing, these orthodox clerics are drawn from the same closed gene pool as the Right, who have wrecked the Liberal Party and have entirely undermined the fight for great causes. The Fathers of the Church never made the mistake of accepting the debrained as their theological advisers and were reluctant to ordain any man, schooled or not, who was without a brain. They realised morons wreaked far more damage than any good they might do. What the Fathers abjured is de rigeour in Australia.

Property and from this free economic action is the ground of the Rule of Law. The development of the Common Law tradition is demonstration of this. Regulation or its other name, ‘positive law’, is an assault on absolute property rights and free markets. This is demonstrated by what is stark naked obvious: the imposition of regulation is strangling free action and eliminating property rights. Action and rights are being rendered contingent on the whim of politicians, bureaucrats, and those judges glad to be free of their real duty. (2)Thus we have, it is also the usurpation of the Rule of Common Law. What does this mean but the increasing lawlessness of the executive against Australians.

Here’s the killer punch. Parliament originated as a court of common law, to uphold the rule of law against the Executive. This does mean not merely the rule of law but the protection of the rights of free men and women against intrusive Executives, and Executives attempting to usurp rights. What we are witnessing is a reversal of this function, with Parliament now active in usurpation of rights and elimination of free action. It has set up the situation in which not only is the Executive increasingly lawless, parliamentarians are too.

Distinguished judges have attacked this reversal, pointing out the notion that Executive, MPs and bureaucrats are above the Rule of Law is insidious and the fact of increasing lawless is ominous and reflection of its force. They have pointed out that the Executive, Parliament, and bureaucracy, in placing themselves above the law is worse than dangerous. What the Victorian STO and OPA have been converted into, Heinergate, and Iguanagate reflect some of these grave dangers.

Regulation as lawlessness also means Parliament, the Executive and its administrative apparatus becomes a haven for thugs and gangsters. This is what Iguanagate made transparent to the public. The pin of Iguanagate is, after all, a pack of thugs who assume correctly they are above the law, and can threaten any man and woman and their property rights and get away with it. The NSW DPP made this plain in rejecting hard video evidence, and ignoring the heavy handed attempts to suborn the witnesses.

There is also a matter of what happened when the witnesses gave their statements to police. Mr. Jared Gollo related in a statement to the media that his ‘interview’ was long in duration and was intense. However, he did not fold under the pressure applied because he is telling the truth. In short, his statement is suggestive of:

The police did not do their duty, rooted in upholding the rule of law against thugs, and follow strict procedure in taking witness’ statement of complaints. It reads very much the police were treating them as criminals. The stench of systematic corruption and perversion of justice hangs in the air, and it needs uncompromising, fearless investigation. This is in addition to re-opening the case as raised through the witness complaints.

The next article on the subject of lawlessness and regulation versus sound economics and the rule of law addresses, who is responsible for this shocking descent into socialist barbarism. No prizes for guessing the venal and myopic Right did the damage. It is the explanation of why and how they are guilty of this that needs to be drawn out. It must be made crystal clear, for it is more unpleasant evidence of the great damage this pack of sponge-bags have caused.

(1) The Church censored St. Francis of Assissi. They didn’t question his sanctity. They censored him for what stank of worship of nature, motivated by his rejection of private property, and the free market, and his reviling of those engaged in commerce. Oh, and his mendicancy. Taken together, Francis’ position is quite in contrast to, for example, Benedict and Benedictines.

The Church rightly condemned Francis’ position as in dangerous error and not a true insight into Christian Faith. The Church’s conclusion remains correct; it is against Christian Faith, and an atavistic descent into barbarism with appalling implications.

So, besides the cult of socialism, why have some orthodox clerics also embraced the Greens’ death cult and this is what the Greens’ position is?! The a-brainal cannot exercise reason and judgment; the bring to bear only hellish stupidity.

(2) This is why genuinely sound Judges and genuine public servants (as opposed to bureaucrats) have been on the receiving end of nasty treatment indeed.