Mangled Thoughts

Thus Mr Finn MLC (Liberal Party) commenced his speech against the “euthanasia” Bill. It was given an orwellian name:

Medical Treatment (Physician Assisted Dying) Bill 2008

State ordered killing is not only medical treatment but the finest expression of the Hippocratic oath! Many doctors took exception and wrote strongly worded protests to MsP against the Bill.

The Bill was defeated last week (10/9/08) 25 to 12. A comprehensive defeat, but it was a far closer run thing than the raw numbers suggest.

One of the blobs the scrofulous Right have jobbed into Liberal Party seats, Mr. David Davis, explained the next morning that the bill had not been drafted properly. He continued that if it were sent to the ‘Law Reform Commission’ (code for jackbooted thugs but this is entirely lost upon Davis) and rectified by these Kommissars, it would be passed.

Yes, it wasn’t merely a rumour, a Bill for State ordered killing was put before the Victorian Parliament. The reason why is clear enough. Examined properly it is cognate to the “Abortion Bill”. The former was raised as a ‘private member’s Bill’. It was raised, unsurprisingly by a Party of diseased Leftists, the Greens, through one Colleen Hartland MLC.

It was also totalitarian in scope for good measure, as the Orwellian abuse of language reinforces and entrenches. Consider, for example:

Section 9: No . duty to assist – A doctor is not under any duty to provide assistance under this Act but must inform the sufferer that other doctors may be willing to provide assistance. A doctor who fails to do so is guilty of an offence. Penalty – 5 penalty units

Clause 9(1): doctors who decline to provide assistance under the Bill ‘must tell the sufferer that other doctors may be willing to provide assistance’

clause 9(2): health care providers who do not provide assistance under the Bill must, on request, transfer a full copy of the patient’s relevant medical records to the new health care provider

Section 10: professional organizations and associations must not apply prejudicial pressure or penalties for things done by someone lawfully under the Bill. (The restraint also applies to health care providers, but not to providers that do not permit their facilities or associations to provide assistance under the Bill.)

Non-victimisation – Provides that a professional organisations or associations must not censure or discipline or subject to other penalty or loss, a person who assists or refuses to assist a sufferer end their life.

The expansion of clause 10 is, “prejudicial pressure or penalties for things done by someone lawfully under the Bill.”

clause 11: no-one may try to resuscitate a person who takes a drug to end his or her life pursuant to the Bill

If it had been passed, it would be a criminal offence for doctors and nurses in any hospital to refuse to aid in the killing of anyone recommended for killing (and this is the force, the selection of defenceless individuals for state ordered killing). Contrary to what those who drafted the Bill, and those who supported it in Parliament claim, doctors and nurses in being compelled to recommend those who are willing to execute State ordered killings would be by naked Government compelled to aid and abet what would be shocking crimes ordered by the administration of Brackistan.

Now this is what we have in in the Bracks-Brumby abortion Bill, state ordered killing of the defenceless, but in the womb. That is what it is, sucxking the brains out of babies, trying to poison them and if they do not die in the womb, as is done in other countries, they are strangled or cast aside to die slowly. It also has an Orwellian title:

Abortion Law Reform Bill 2008

Again, this Bill if it is passed makes it a criminal offence for doctors and nurses to refuse aiding and abetting state ordered killing of babies. Clause 8 spells this out:

“Obligation to refer woman despite conscientious objection of practitioner

“Imposes a referral obligation on registered health practitioners who have a conscientious objection to abortion. A health practitioner must refer the woman to another registered health practitioner who the practitioner knows does not have a conscientious objection to abortion.

“Obligation to perform or assist in emergency abortions to preserve life of pregnant woman despite conscientious objection of practitioner or nurse

“Notwithstanding a conscientious objection, a registered medical practitioner is under a duty to perform an abortion, and a registered nurse is under a duty to assist in the performance of an abortion in an emergency where the abortion is necessary to preserve the life of the pregnant woman.”

Observe this chilling section:

9]. Repeals section 10 of the Act dealing with the offence of child destruction.

Notes: 1. Section 10 of the Crimes Act 1958 provides –

Offence of child destruction

(1) Any person who, with intent to destroy the life of a child capable of being born alive, by any wilful act unlawfully causes such child to die before it has an existence independent of its mother shall be guilty of the indictable offence of child destruction, and shall be liable on conviction thereof to level 4 imprisonment (15 years maximum).

(2) For the purposes of this section evidence that a woman had at any material time been pregnant for a period of twenty-eight weeks or more shall be prima facie proof that she was at that time pregnant of a child capable of being born alive.

Rule of (Common) Law overthrown
For the umpteenth time, in clause 11:

“Rule of common law abolished
New section 66 formally abolishes any rule of common law creating an offence in relation to procuring a woman’s miscarriage”

This is is only one more bit of hard evidence : the increasing lawless of the Executive, and in this case with murderous intent.

When is a baby not a baby but a fetus and a fetus a baby?

The answer is whether it will be killed. If it is to be killed, then it’s a fetus. This is another monstrous abuse of lanaguage but these are the sort of expressions which the boosters use to justify the move towards state coerced killing of the unborn. Here is a chilling instance:

Twiddling the radio tuner Sunday evening stopped at an exchange between Dr Sally Cockburn who also goes under the vile nom de plume, Dr Feelgood. She and her ‘panel’, which included Kommissar of “Health” Beth Wilson. Wilson is a lawyer (surprise, surprise). Her Monash University PR blurb discloses her career has been one long burden to long suffering Victorian taxpayers. They are pro state ordered killing. Cockburn once compared abortion to removing haemorrhoids. During their shallow ‘discussion’, they interchange fetus and abortion depending on whether a baby is to be killed or not.

“Cockburn…says when someone comes to her surgery with a lump on the bum she…”

One of the ‘panel’ declared, ‘more babies survive today than in the past.’ Her point was, abortion reflects nothing more than mortalioty rates in vitro. Hang on a sec:

Entrepreneurs invented the first great life-saver, disinfectant. This resulted in a great reduction deaths. They then resolved how to supply new medical procdures and how to deliver them at increasingly lower prices (contrast socialist schemes such as Medicare which is very costly as the growing, long waiting lists for surgey telling reflects). Free markets and entreprenuers overcame what was a devestating blight in the past. Now we have dumbkopfs saying, ‘bring on the good old days through state ordered murder’!

Anti-Bill of Rights

It came as a shock to learn it was the Kennett Administration prepared the anti-Bill of Rights. The timing of this Bill indicates the Kennett Administration might also have prepared the Blasphemy ‘Act’. This is all on top of what they did with the STO and OPA.

While state ordered killing is an aim of the diseased Left, they have made major inroads only because of the myopic, statist Right, and thier defective economics. The grounds of the rule of common law is property rights and free economic action. It is out of these real rights are generated and thus the dignity and freedom and life of the individual is advanced. The Right haven’t failed badly on these grave matters. They are a massive intellectual and moral failure.

What has occurred in Victoria has been extensive inroads into real rights, with the upshot:

The STO and OPA is engaged in systematic larceny.
Larceny to prop up alternative energy ’scams’, and desalination plant (instead of genuine free market massive dams on rivers)
Billions squandered on Sports and entertainments

And the real Rights of Victorians ground under the feet of Statist morons and thugs. And this bleak comedy is played out in the two Bills. Under the anti-Bill of Rights, so long as a Bill meshes with that pack of elastic garbage, it’s ok and that is what is to be found in these two Bill, state ordered murder is ok becaase it can be meshed with the anti-Bill of Rights. Notice also:

By appeal to that bog paper, the anti-Bill of Rights, politicians absolve themselve of culpability for the genuinely criminal overthrow of real rights and any malevolent scheme they dream up. “It was me, it was the Bill of Rights that made me do it that’s wot”, and this the tenor of the sentimental rubbish spewed out by all behind those Bills for state ordered killing. They remain culpable.

It must not be ignpored, under the abortion ‘Bill’, it is a crime for any doctor and nurse to refuse to do as the administration dictates.

The abortion bill has been passed in the Lower House but is yet to be put to the Upper House. Under this Bill, doctors and nurses face automatic prosecution if they do not do as the slobs in Spring Street dictate, and this Bill recieved support from some of the Blobs.

The Bills are cognate. It is no accident at all that they were introduced and debated roughly simultaneously. Little dictatorial parasites enrich themselves while having effectively reduced Victoria to a one party State, and only a few short steps from outright absolutism. For good measure, to ensure the complete debauchment of Victorians, they gaily render it also a charnal house.

The best the camotose Right can do is bleat like Mary’s bloody little lamb. Well, lamb belongs on barbecues, in ovens, and in frying pans for a tasty gnosh up. Meanwhile “Red” Ted Baillieu and Michael Kroger continue to strip the Party of anyone who could be merely accused of holding genuine Liberal Principles. Just to check, here is Komrade Ted in action, purifying the Party:

RED TED: Leader’s office shrieks “Death to America” in between faction fights

While their clunker tanks, the HR Nicholls Society, the Institute of Public Affairs, and the Centre for Independent Studies continue to fatten themselves at taxpayers expense and at the expense of Liberal Party members. More lamb to be roasted.