Mangled Thoughts

Awoke this morning to a shock. It was reported on the radio a fire had started in Timboon, and warnings had been issue to locals to decide by 10.00 whether to fight or flee. This was adjusted an hour later to say the fire wasn’t a threat, ie. about to convert into a fire-storm. The concern is simple, Timboon is centrally located in the jungle covering the Otways, spreading East and West.

Since not much else since has been reported, presumably it is contained in the area where it commenced. This is a relief, because the Otways is a sleeping fire-storm and should it awake, it will exceed the horror of Kinglake. It is a long drive out of the Otways jungle and fire storms can race at 200 km.p.h., as the fire-storms demonstrated. What a rotten choice to have to make.

It was murder committed using fire-storms, and by power capacity imposed cuts by Bracks during the heatwave.  The Greens have blood on their hands. So do the politicians of the major parties, who imposed Greens’ policies and other measures which served them, such as seizure of inalienable private propertie, which both major parties in Victoria agreed on. They are crimes that must be avenged with the full weight of the law and, needless to say, it means the Bracks and Brumby Cabinets’ Ministers hauled before courts and convicted.

Though, of the Liberal Party, to be clear, it is the Rightwing clique who strangle it and the politicians they loaded Liberal seats in Spring Street with, who are also responsible. It is not the Liberal Party, as genuine Liberal Party members well know. They also know who is at the bottom of it all; Kroger, Costello, and their Toorak Brahman backers, of which two notable identities are Ron Walker and Hugh Morgan. They see nothing wrong in destroying Australians with Greens’ policies. What can be wrong with that if they and their pals can make a few billions extra out of politicians pouring stolen loot into their faux enterprise, a nuclear power company. Greg Lindsay happily does his bit, helping politicians help his pals in a great game of fraud and larceny.

Will Peter Garrett face criminal charges?

He must. He also must be sacked from Parliament in disgrace, with a permanent stain on his record. Those engaged in such actions are not allowed to enter Parliament, it is an offence to admit them. 

 Anti-whaling activist Paul Waston says he spiked trees with Peter Garrett

Friends have mused that it is a question begging as to whether he also spiked trees. Watson is clearly definite in his statement. Where does this leave Garrett?

Consider the objective of spiking: it means deliberate action to injure, maim, and kill loggers, and sabotage. These are major crimes, capital crimes. Aiding and abetting, including protecting, warrants the same charges be brought against those who aid and abet. Watson’s statement must bring the attention of detectives to Garrett.

Let’s not forget, Victorians were outraged, livid, at judges who did not do their duty and convict Greenies who did the same in Victorian worked forests in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Let’s reduce it: It’s OK for diseased Greens to deliberately commit sabotage and prepare a means of injuring, maiming for life, and murdering men engaged in their lawful business? And because of what?! The infantile lies the Greens adhere to as their beliefs! 

Watson, however, didn’t simply state Garrett stood by as he spiked the trees. He also stated, “We spiked them”. This can only mean, according to Watson that Garrett did not only aid and abet. He also engaged in the same actions. Now, why would this exempt Garrett from the full force of the Law in its criminal application. 

Taken with the fire-storms, the policies that made them, he also has rivers of unavenged blood on his hands. There is no end to the malice and treachery of this pscyopathic, lying, diseased bastard. He is now the subject of another investigation, corruption as a Minister in Rudd’s Cabinet:

Garrett accused of leaking decision to pulp mill

There is more to said on the proposed Gunn’s pulp mill, including how Right-wing politicians are also trying to help their Greenie mates kill it, so it will be the subject of another item next week.

Let’s not forget his track record as head of the heavily taxpayer subsidised Greens’ front the Australia Conservation Foundation. Garrett on television, in c.1995, boasted of how he enjoyed recruiting youths into their front and tapping their energy to serve their cause. What is this but, corruption of youths.

The KGB set up the Greens ‘movement’ as a front to appear as if it were a spontaneous ‘civil disobedience’ movement of Western youths. They wrote the rule book on recruitment, brainwashing and modus operandi of its ‘civil disobedience’. The objective was to hit why the West is prosperous and free, smash capitalism. Well, the thugs of the Stalinist regime will collect , unless Greens’ policies and politicians imposing them are stopped hard.

That is what Garrett’s boast reduces to, turning and brainwashing youths. Using them at a time when youngsters have to establish themselves to make a life for themselves as a cover for the Greens’ destructive aims. It was what the Greeks meant by corruption of youth, reflected in: it is precisely what Socrates was charged with. Today, parents have had their authority undermined and eliminated by Victoria’s rotten politicians, which means their freedom to take action against corrupters of youths has been usurped. Adding injury to injury, the cult of the Greens has been substituted in schools for science. Nonetheless, it remains a crime that is actionable, and should be prosecuted.

Garrett also harbours dictatorial fantasies as he has made plain as a Minister. His speech is littered with a telling expression: “My power [to do….]”. It is false, though politicians believe that they are bestowed ‘power’ to dispose of others and their properties, so vividly demonstrated these last few weeks. Not under Common Law.

Cabinet Ministers only exercise authority. The origin of Parliament is as a court of Common Law to ensure the Executive, King in (War) Council did not usurp property rights, including asserting some divine right to tax free men into the ground. Even under the Constitution, Garrett has no power as of right as a Minister.

Garrett is a wealthy brat, of well healed parents. He is violent. He proliferated a diseased cult, using youths as his devout followers and slaves to do some of the Greens’ dirty work.

He has blood on his hands. The policies that killed hundreds of Victorians are his and this Greens pals’ policies. They were the instruments of the commission of murder of hundreds of Victorians and what the death toll is, is not yet finalised. Murder, criminal violence, and that is the substance of Watson’s statements. He is worse than corrosive. He should be, when he is seated, hauled out of Parliament in handcuffs.

So, what is Mr. Ian Campbell doing, allying and making friends of murderous rodents? Oh, he was a ‘watermelon deep red’ Right-wing Minister of the cult of environmentalism. He, along with David Kemp and Malcolm Turnbull put in place many of the core ’policies’ Kevin Rudd and Penny Wong are busy intensifying and extending, measures that will be thoroughly ruinous and entails the grim prospect many more Australians will be murdered by these slimes.

It comes as no suprise to see a “watermelon red” Right wing moron joining diseased, violent criminals:

Losing the edge against Japanese whaling

Tiny Tim Blair misses the essentials, again. Enjoying Garrett’s humiliation is itself feeble, as opposed to, for example, the above thrust right into Garrett’s gizzards. Tiny Tim Blair also fails to attack those who ensured the Greens advance and imposed their policies, politicians of the major parties. It is understandable why Tiny Tim is so feeble:

1. He has no brains

2. he has no spine

3. He sold out to those whom he believes are his pals, the venal, callous, Greeny hugging Right. How are Greg Lindsay’s barbecues these days TinyTim? What, with the same faces enlivened with joyous depression over being exposed for their treachery against Australians and the Liberal Party, they sound a right gas.

Just to throw them in, a couple of articles that are not altogether off grim subject:

Anti-whaling ship raided 

Whalers attack activists at sea  ( Good on the Japanese whaling men!)

Scientific lunacy

Though he wrote riotously of charlatans paid to develop their magical powers by the spooks in HOO, to be deployed against the might of the Wermacht in his Sword of Honour trilogy, would Evelyn Waugh be surprised at the translation of inane beliefs into a cult ‘mainstream’ politicians have imposed on a grand scale by no other means than naked power, backed by massive tax grabs?

Mind, 1870’s to 1930’s Continental Europe descended in a mad rush into a poisonous swill that led them to destruction. Today, we have an army of politicians, bureaucrats and charlatans bent on proving man can drink swill and live, by making them do it on the strength of nothing more than brute coercion.

What Waugh perceived, von Mises penetrated and eviscerated with deadly accuracy. The Right, pretending to know the Austrian school, are blissfully ignorant of even this. Besides, why should they be enlightened when they joyfully, arm in arm, indulged in pleasures when in office, and now under Turnbull howl Rudd’s measures are not brutal enough?

Anyway, here’s another instance of charlatanism and taxpayers are forced to pay every stolen cent of this $30 million dollar fraud: 

Gassed-up livestock in Govt’s sights 

Economic Destruction

As one remarked long before when they were first raised in Federal Governmet, under Right wing watermelon red Minister, carbon taxes, even if intended against specific capital combinations, may have wider impact than conceived. Then, the aim is to kill production in order to stop what is in fact a boon for life, Co2 emissions, as this article shows:

ETS to butcher farm output and earnings

Here, wrong is either a liar or has deliberately kept herself in the dark so she cannot be found guilty of lying to Parliament and, frankly, if it is the second reason then it is an offence too, a grotesque derelection of duty to Australians:

Wong denies ETS will undermine household cuts

The minimum estimate is it will cost each household $3,600 per annum, $300 per month. This estimate was announced on a news report but it is wrong. The truth is, ETS means politicians dictating a price hike of a factor of not 3 times but 5 times per household.

Who are the beneficiaries of ETS. Well, it isn’t consumers. It’s not firms producing and relying on efficient energy. It’s not non-energy firms who nonethless have to pay the ETS on top of watching the price of input, energy, spiral as production is smashed. It’s the likes of Greg Lindsay’s friends, ETS ‘traders’, ‘carbon emissions consulting firms’ such as Peony, and politicians and bureaucrats and charlatans via taxation, who clean up while everyone else suffers. Oh and the Walker - Morgan ‘carbon tax and nuke them into the ground’ parasite company.

Notice, as one concerned gentleman calculated, even at the lesser amount:

Think that over all of you single pensioners who are due for a promised $35 per week increase in pension. I hope you all realize that you will be only $160 per month behind.

Adjust the number by the figure that is on the mark, the truth, 5 times.

Already there are too many old age pensioners who froze last winter and sweltered in summer, and go without meals, because the pension spreads nowhere.

It will also finish off a lot of families. It isn’t exactly belt fattening for many singles either.

Making it all the more perverse, the criminal parasites don’t see that as firms collapse under the weight, others leave for countries which won’t give into the Greens lies and the fraud of carbon taxes and ETS is a carbon tax. Even with the W-H ‘nuke em plant’, the great boon the others hope to collect on will dry up like the Simpson Desert:

Or,  are they planning to flee to, oh China or Switzerland with the loot, leaving behind a destoyed Australia and the millions living in misery. Because if it is imposed, Australia will be razed. Brackistan Victoria looks bad enough as it is, without that on top.

Yet, the above is before taking into account dis-economies of scale of ‘alternative energy’ and the one Greg Lindsay’s mates hope to become wealthier by, nuclear energy, and the destruction of capital of what Penny Wong glibly calls ‘re-structuring the economy’. This stridently dictatorial ingnoramus doesn’t have a flea’s graps of what she is talking about (hmmph, neither  do the Right).

The alternatives suffer from massive diseconomies of scale, which the CIS has not denied. Add this to the destruction of capital in energy production and much else on top, and then take into accounts the ETS and the propect is not scary;  it is absolutely terrifying.

The CIS has refused to provide any cost estimates of its own. It has every motive not to. Telling the truth is damaging to the aims of all those around Lindsay, and his aims. The money trail is a fascinating thing to study.

Having piled up case studies last year, let’s add to the mountain contradicting the politicians and Lindsay and friends:

Economic Crisis Complicates California’s Goals on Climate

Never forget:

Capital accumulation raises real rates of pay.

Destruction of capital cuts pay. Carbon taxation means forcing many into increasingly labour intensive jobs - real cuts and also, increasingly harder physical jobs. Back to a past millions escaped. It’s called the medieval age:

Higher paying jobs are destroyed in favour of lower paid jobs, because capital is destroyed which is what the evidence in the article on California again demonstrates. Greg Lindsay has persisted in denying this evidence. What sort of creep is it that ignores solid theory confirmed by mountains of solid evidence and still growing! Lindsay is in good company, the sort of bastards mentioned above.

Another instance:  PM’s carbon plan a $60bn threat to LNG

There is another problem with LNG. Woodside Petroleum” CEO,  Mr Voelte believes the way to fight is to concede the Greens lies, concede carbon taxation and shoot straight from the hip with special pleading, “Please, please pretty please, hit everyone else but not us”. He’s up a creek in a barbed wire swim suit believing that even if the taxes were not directly levied on them, they can escape them.

Then, this is the board that stripped share-holders’ of their property rights on the Shell bid and that Right-wing Statist thug, Peter Costello, obliged them. Is the board of Woodside Petroleum also in with the larceny squad grouped around Greg Lindsay and the CIS, because Voelte’s whine is smelly?

Those responsible for murdering Victorians, they committed murder and must be tried and convicted for these crimes. Now we have, for good measure, politicians in all parties, charlatans and ‘think tanks’ having made it plain they will perpetrate crimes on a tremendous scale against all Australians, excepting themselves. Deranged, demented. In saner times, at best they’d be put in white jackets and never see the outside of a lunatic asylum ever again.

Unforgivable, absolutely unforgiveable. They have stamped all over them:

Liars Thugs Bastard Tyrants Murderers

Because that is what their actions unambigiuously demonstrates

Doyle declared a few weeks ago, his trip to Russia was necessary. A diplomatic, internationalisto relations splitting fracas would erupt if he didn’t. War with the Muscovites! He solemnly told the victims, ratepayers of Melbourne, it was the only reason he is going, for he’s all against junkets. Why, the No.2 man of all the Russias wants to see him, the Nag of Moscow - for as Doyle inflated, being the Muscovite Nag means he could be the next Putin. Robert Doyle of the F.O. will do his duty.

His high level source inside Australia’s F.O. had briefed and instructed him. He blabbed it all over the radio to all Victorians and the rest of the world “this is very sensitive. Refusal will cause a crisis. I have to go.”

A briefing came in, and it didn’t look good. My friend got hold of it (he must have lifted it from the garbage cans littering Melbourne. I’ll doff my lid, he’s a canny cunning bastard.) Never one to keep to himself without reason top, top, very secret secrets, he whose name is a byword for confidence personified of course published the dirt:

Robert Doyle abandons his St Petersberg junket

Oh, dear, dear, dear. This was the junket top secret mission. Phut, cancelled. Australia’s top operative put himself on ice - not that he noticed any difference. He iced the whole show. The man knows what to do when he smells danger and his record is impeccable; standing down wind taking in the smoke from a fire long out is Alert and Ready never bested - even if the britches are a tad singed and the plastic surgeon fears he needs to apply a couple of gallons of putty like mascara on a broad of the night.

Strider, being the patriotic chap he is, did withhold some details of the racket. He needed a high-level chat. So we went to the pub and cooked it up, “Yes, we can do this.” So, here is the rest of it, and we might as well let slip who deep throat is - in for a penny so make it a pound I say:

Jim “Tiny Jumbo” Carruthers of the F.O. chatted to Doyle, behind the City Council chambers, while hosing a rose bush with a fire hose connected to a fire-hydrant and not the john! The meeting place was arranged in signals sent to Doyle’s office by a circuitous route and borne by a lycra clad retarded cretin riding a terror instrument euphemistically called a bicycle, who handed a butcher paper written in pretty crayons (he couldn’t rote learn it) saying, “Doyle, you little ferret, 1.00 pm tomorrow, be there or be square”, over to the bell hop who gave up his old day job because it had been wiped out by Hugh Morgan, and also so that he could stop crying and have a good laugh for once.

As Doyle and Carruthers stood watching thousands of gallons of water revive the rose and so did a crowd of serfs, who were promptly hauled off to jail unlike Greens who merely riot in the streets and injure police whom Commissar Nixon couldn’t give a stuff about either, the Bell Hop agreed to take a microphone used by that corrupter of youth and bloody liar Peter Garrett and secret it somewhere so we could get a complete recording.

The Bell Hop, because of his disguise could pull it off. He walked up to them and rammed it somewhere but I can’t say where, because I was too busy taking in the look of sudden pain that spread all over Doyle’s face and plugging my ears to block out his screams:

Doyle: “What was that?!”He howled.

Whatever happened, it must have been pretty nasty, because it was the first time the little runt had felt what pain can be like. Carruthers, concentrating on his mission, the cryptic code- no, not that sort of cryptic code. The frigging cryptic crossword, and he all concern remarked “Oh, do be quiet you big pansy,” and retuned to finishing off the last clue.

This is the transcript of the conversation, though Doyle’s remarks are omitted, inane pouting clarifies nothing and tends to wear thin after a couple of seconds:

“Doyley, Doyley, are you listening to me!”

[Deep throat soliloquises,’Most likely not, he’s in love with the echo chamber inside his cranium.’]

“Doyle! Pay attention. If you do not go to Russia, and meet a secret agent pet poodle code-named, Putin, there’ll be hell to pay.”

“Damn it man, stop admiring yourself in your beauty compact mirror and listen. You don’t go and it’s war, trade war with Moscow!”

“They asked you to come. I don’t have a clue on earth why, but they did.”

“What for? What for? Why in heaven’s name should I know. We’ve got nothing much to do with them. They’ve got nothing much to do with us. Personally, I prefer it that way.”

“Wing it, Doyle. Tell the serfs of Melbourne: You go because you will bring victory, mercantilist trade. Though what they’d buy from Brackistan beats me. Seems to me both your lot and the Bracks-Brumby gang have done a smashing job smashing enterprise in… what was its name? Ah, right, Victoria. Ah, I apologise, your lot turned it into Vic Inc. first, and Bracks and Brumby thanked you, heartily, for the good turn. No parasite worth it’s blood wants to put in hard shift now, do they.”

The above was followed around the time of Strider’s disclosure by a second stitch-up hush hush meeting which yielded the inside for Strider’s disclosure. The method of extraction was the same, even to the hour, bell hop and microphone, but on a different day of course.

It would have been bleeding obvious if we did it the same day. Thicker than a brick coated in cement and encased in steel as Doyle is, a chap has to allow even he might have twigged on to us and that would have been no good at all. I mean to say, I’ve never been able to stay in the same room as a cry baby let alone attempt to pacify one. Oh, Carruthers did offer a suggestion:

“Look chaps, it’s more than my life’s worth but you can pacify him. There are a few of us who sympathise. Putting up with a pack of prize pillocks selling you lot out, shredding your rights, stripping others of all their property through the OPA-STO is enough to make any good man puke. The only drawback is; they have infantalised too many Australians, drawing blood is an offence. Mind, that never worried greenies spiking trees to murder good men, or the diseased Left injuring and maiming others in one of their joy riots.”

“Damn it, Carruthers, we haven’t seen you and you seem a good chap, so why did you have to kill a good idea? What’s the matter with a bit of Burgundy tint all over the footpath?”

“Don’t be a fool man. You have the goods; go publish and be damned. I’ll sort things out my end. Bell Hop, good man. Do you reckon you can fit into Doyle’s suit? Good. We’ll insert you into the Mayoral Office, as soon as we have him sedated with a barrel of Bollinger and we’ll keep him there. He’ll be so full he won’t even be able to waddle out to piss on the lemon tree.”

Oh, dear, dear, now I nearly proceeded to disclose some more ultra very top, top secret secrety things. I’ll have to have a chat with my friend strider in HQ pub and sort out what we can cook up next.

P.S.

“… being the Muscovite Nag means he could be the next Putin.”

Might have stumbled onto something here. The Mayor of Moscow might be a bit slow or not realise that unlike the Putin-KGB-Communist Mafia in Russia, cream puffs from Melbourne wouldn’t topple him in order to move on Putin. Oh, they might dream about it, and in the safety of their clubrooms stick pins into figurines -’Take this, I got you…’ But up front, direct, ha! So Moscow cancelled Doyle’s junket behind his back.

It’s one hypothesis. Another is, they found out about Doyle, and realised they’d have a dickens of time stopping Russian women saying something unpleasant in front of the Nag’s entourage, “Lovely pink they’re wearing”. For their safety, Moscow cancelled the happy holiday tour.

Why did they have to go overboard with being considerate of others when their disappointed eager guests have never bothered finding out what consideration might even look like? There is a limit to decency and I’ll have to write to Putin and let him know, and he owes me a favour.

That’s 2, so I’ll stop here, the possibilities simply trip off the key-tapping pads.

I made sure Bolt saw “Scoop…” He’s formally a journalist, but he is the Right’s media PR spin man. He is also their promotions man for the food production destroying fraud of ethanol production. He’s not about to do the honest thing for once and roast those whom he believes are his mates over the “Nuke em into the ground’ putsch - so that this lot can become wealthier than they already are by billions of dollars. It’s much braver to pour contempt on modest Australians.

Oh, bye the bye, besides their desire to collar billions of dollars via the Ron Walker and Hugh Morgan fronted nuclear company the honest way, larceny, their “company” is also busy trying to own nuclear waste dumps. Anyway, Bolt, and his mate Tiny Tim Blair have a lot to cover for  report on. Oh, “Scoop…” I have been told, was circulated widely. Bolt is properly skewered on this.

The same day, in his good Right-wing sneering form, he spat on modest Australians, again. He did it over labour market reform. He did it for Costello. The peasants are nasty ingrates for not realising Blue Peter made them as wealthy as Bolt is, by rejecting Costello. He can’t help himself. He is at it again.

He blamed modest Australians for being venal slimes. This is Bolt’s stunning economic analysis of Rudd’s $52 billion dollar Kenynesian spending spree. Unfortunately, the impact is on modest readers to the delight of the hard Left, as comments attached to the web page of the ‘article’ shows.

Free money for the reckless

It’s alright, because he has numbers supporting him. Here’s a demonstration, from the CIS. Professor Saunders asserted ‘mutual obligations’ is good and just. He dismissed some charities’ opposition to ‘mutual obligations’ as insidious Leftist activism.

It is true some associations are infected with diseased Leftists, including the St. Vincent de Paul Society, and so abuse its members. This is one thing, and their ‘economics’ is rotten, but presumption is fatal.

Saunders derided the notion that there are real barriers to employment. There are in fact barriers, they are effective wage rates. These are imposed rates and are higher than market rates. They mean a 100% pay cut for some to many Australians, called unemployment. For those already unemployed, it means they can be unemployed for far longer than they hoped.

Unemployment benefits is compensation for forced unemployment. The tragedy is, it does not compensate the unemployed entirely. “Mutual obligations”, therefore, is an abuse of the abused. The Right sees nothing wrong in this because, well, Australians are only smelly oafs who should know their place and do what they are told. There it is, it is also coercion and also forced labour, something the Right would never subject themselves too.

Indeed, a few weeks past, the President of the “Young Liberals” publicly raised just that, forced labour. Every school leaver should be press-ganged into ‘national service’. He clarified the scheme; it means also pretend work gangs ’schemes’. This might be the drivel of a retarded teenager. He’s 30 years old and, he explained, “He lives in the real world”. Yah, so does everyone else. Ah, the rider is, he’s an accountant; this makes him a real capitalist, according to the Right.

His vile notion was broadcast all over Victoria and elsewhere on 3AW, during the Derryn Hinch show. Hinch got it right, it is “forced labour”. Callers spat chips, one mother furious her son, who has successfully established himself, could have his business destroyed because of forced labour.  There are still Europeans who can remember this nice invention of socialist regimes. Here is an article on the grand plan to reduplicate forced labour:

Young Liberals call for national service

It is hardly likely the spoilt brat and “El Presidente” raised it publicly as a muse and a matter for ‘debate’. It’s not for debate. Hinch debated him, and shot right between the eyes with that single phrase, and what did the cretin do? He whined “That’s your opinion Derryn.” That’s the Right’s notion of defending a position.

Rudd announced in short time the plan to impose forced labour.

It is, at bottom, what the Right means by labour market reform, as the HR Nicholls Society have made very clear in the mush they falsely purvey as the case for free labour markets.

One of Saunders’ solutions to put people back into jobs, next to binding the unemployed to chain gangs, is wage rates must be forced down. It squares with what Hugh Morgan and the rest of the HR Nicholls clubmen mean. No wonder they made sure the sound case for free labour markets was not presented to the Prime Minister and Cabinet. They are opposed to free markets.

Free labour markets clears unemployment because market prices prevail, established by marginal productivity that meshes supply and demand. Capital  sets their height, accumulation raises rates, capital demolition cuts them. But then, the Right are about to smash capital via carbon taxes, to enrich themselves through the “Nuclear Plan”.

A google search shows how much damage the lousy economics of the Right causes. It is why modest Australians voted for Rudd.

Soon, with Tiny Tim Blair, Andrew Bolt will be writing masterpieces in economics for Greg Lindsay’s Centre for Independent Studies’ rag, Policy.  Here’s Professor Saunder’s masterful treatment of labour markets:

A Whiff of Compassion? The Attack on Mutual Obligation
Peter Saunders

Bye the bye, phony ‘work training’, and ‘job search skills training’ do not prepare anyone for real, earning jobs in production. Most of the Right would have to accept very low rates if they were to find starts in real firms.

A Right-wing Orwellianism:

Callousness = compassion

They are very compassionate.

Readers, these oddities are not finished with. Tomorrow, another grave matter the Right also manages to completely discredit, and it has caused great damage, will be introduced. Again, Professor Saunders is served up as a star examplar of this, their peculiar notion of success.

When I broached a serious subject to some of my City friends, as a soon as I mentioned Saunders’ name, they broke up laughing. They rolled about. The only thing they could get out was, “That clown.” And they’d break up again, each time. Needless to say, that was the dead end of the discussion.

Bolt forks himself effortlessly, every week.  Kroger has a real eye for talent… Julian “the Shitzeel” Sheezel.

Rush Limbaugh has a nice little speech by Presdient Obama on his site celebrating “the joy of unemployment” on his plan. I have to wash my mouth out. I can’t believe I said that, calling this diseased Leftist half-wit Mr. President. It is an expletive laced with putrefying vegemite, baked in weevil filled stale flour, and I have never liked vegemite. Hmmm, it sums up the Rudd-Swann-Kim “Il” Carr plan too.

Delphic Oracle the 2^nd, Ben S. Bernanke

A fine successor to Alan Greenspan at the Fed. Oh, Greenspan knows what causes recessions and who is responsible them, but at no time could he finger the Fed. When a man has to climb a greasey pole, a man has gotta do what a man has gotta do; swallow principles and kiss backsides.

Bernanke is different. He exudes true belief in; funny money and Keynesianitis is the driver of economic success. I’m not saying he does believe it but, unlike Greespan, he gives a jolly good impression of it. As his predecessor, this in itself provides great scope for the amazing powers that suddenly infest a chap in his apotheosis to Delphic Oracle 1^st class. There are, of course, 2^nd, 3^rd… N^th class D.O.’s; as many as their are central banks. Bernanke is Unero Numero EL Supremo D.O., and he excels.

Who is going to say he got a blessed thing wrong? I defy any man to take an axe to him. In a year’s time or, if American’s are really lucky and it takes two years between Obama, Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner to ruin them completely, no one will be able to contradict Bernanke:

WASHINGTON – Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke said Tuesday he sees a “reasonable prospect” for an end to the deep recession this year if the numerous rescue and stimulus programs work as intended.

But he warned in his semiannual address to Congress that a full economic recovery could take more than two or three years.

Bernanke was guarded in his outlook and noted that the US economy is in the midst of a “severe contraction” that has continued into the first quarter of 2009,

Bernanke Says Recovery Possible This Year If Programs Work [24/02/09, Newsmax]

Well, folks, he did clear one thing up; that’s what the pain is all about. It’s not all in the imagination. It’s easy to comprehend why the media commentariat, CIS, IPA, and a few Leftists such as Quiggin know what Bernanke knows.

Bernanke decided to cover every butt protection bet possible. The same day, he hastily issued another statement:

Bernanke: Recession Could Extend to 2010

His advice is, ‘break the feedback loop’:

“To break the adverse feedback loop, it is essential that we continue to complement fiscal stimulus with strong government action to stabilize financial institutions and financial markets,” he told the Senate Banking Committee.

All good D.Os. infest closed loops and Mr. Stevens might take into account closed loops do not have feedback. Another demonstration of closed loop syndrome is Australia’s Right. This lot are so cemented in their loop many are pondering why it is taking so long for them to become extinct from cretinism caused by 1st degree inbreeding. It defies physics!

Glenn Stevens of the Reserve Bank of Australia

Aspires to D.O. eminence. He wasn’t about to be outshone by No.1:

 ”In these circumstances, the Board judged that a further sizable reduction in the cash rate was appropriate, to give further support to demand. In making its decision, the Board took into account the package of measures announced by the Government earlier today. The combination of expansionary monetary and fiscal policies now in place will help to cushion the Australian economy from the contractionary forces coming from abroad.”

That was realsed on the 3^rd. On the 21^st he started cheering:

Glenn Stevens sees promising signs

The closest he got to the truth, however, was:

He said the deterioration in the international economy had been so rapid that no policy response could have saved Australia’s economy from faltering in the near term.

A. No policy response was the best policy.

B. Nothing could have staved off the RBA caused recession.

Then, why should he nail it? As he made plain in the article, he’s a keynesian. For Stevens, consumption drives growth.

New rounds of monetary expansion is failing. Economic laws cannot be ignored without peril and indefinitely. It is why firms are screaming for finance, and banks are tightening lending. Real savings are far lower than the impression given by monetary expansion and this means, cut in supply of loans funding to businesses. The news was littered yesterday evening and this morning with announcements of companies’ contractions, and the resulting pain of retrenchment of employees.

Yakka, moreover, is shifting some of its production overseas into China. Indeed, there is another problem which is not caused by recession. Whether it is bound up with Yakka’s decision is a question which can be sorted out only be respectful interviews of the E.Os. of Yakka. I’m referring, of course, to the great damage taxation, inclusive of regulations, has done to production in Australia over decades.

Considerable investments in Australia have been shut down in Australia because of taxation. No, Peter Costello, regulation is not the Rule of Common Law. It is the rule of thuggish economic vandals called politicians, Left and Right. Oh my, Peter only multiplied and intensified regulation. Then, the Right and their clunker tanks, IPA and CIS, have never been about free markets; anything but them, as the Ron Walker-Hugh Morgan-CIS ‘nuke em into the ground’ fraud amply demonstrates.

It all raises a very disturbing concern. In their paper calling for “Industry Policy” (Kim “Il” Carr must have loved it), Berg and Professor Sinclair Davidson also called for ‘alternative energy’. In his demolition of their vile garbage, Jackson raised as a consideration, resting on:

The J curve is true, and its inverse is true;

Is monetary policy destroying the country’s manufacturing base?

Davidson, to be consistent, must refute the inverse is true. He hasn’t and refuses, it seems, to write his brilliant contribution.

Take it a step further: what if savings in Australia are considerably less than suggested by surface evidence. To this, there is an added problem. The fire-storms destroyed a tremendous amount of capital.

Add on Rudd’s $10b and $42 billion spending sprees, which means confiscation of savings and wiping them out, reinforced by Stevens’ new rounds of inflation (attempted anyway since snake-oil is sooner or later overcome by economic laws), what emerges? A very disturbing worry.

Kim “Il” Carr, Commissar for planning, is deeply worried. Contractions, closures and capital fleeing Australia takes the fun out of Soviet style planning, which is what “Industry Policy” is. I mean to say, it’s not fair economic truth robbing him of  his long anticipated pleasure of destroying investments and throwing many into unemployment.

He was on the radio this morning, and he is in a severe panic. He babbled on about how firms are co-operating with him. It’s boggling contemplating why so many are willing to commit suicide on the Government Plan. Carr couldn’t quite face up to the question about the rapidly rising unemployed. He flicked it off by saying, “No one can say they are safe; not even me.” Eh?!

Since when do politicians, enjoying untaxed fringe benefits and fully taxpayer kept, untaxed, fully CPI indexed super, have to worry about being out of a pay packet and find useful work tending their gardens instead? Oh, unless it is election time, but then what were many politicians, including Carr, doing before they entered Parliament. Lawyers, accountants, insider traders pretending to be bankers, teachers, ’social workers’, Union bosses, Peter Costello, Left and Right, these guys and girls don’t have a clue what it means to earn a paypacket. 

Turnbull supports keynesian spending plans. Today, his only objection is as he cried, “where are the promised 90,000 jobs.”

Capital is for investment, not ‘job creation schemes’. Jobs are generated because labour is a factor of production, and only capital accumulation raises real pay rates (from marginal theory of the productivity of labour). Consumption is not investment, it is the exhaustion of investment.

It might be noted, again, Peter Costello increased in real terms Government consumption in each of his budgets by a large factor each time. According to keynesianism, Australia should be No.1 prosperity land. We should all be so wealthy that, why, all should be luxuriating in the Bahamas.

He could do it and record ’surpluses’ because of monetary expansion. This finally does raise nominal prices, which results in real rises in tax revenues to Treasury, because most taxes are indexed. So long as his increases in Cabinet’s consumption plans were less than the stealth increases in tax, he could record surpluses.

The man was as all Treasurers are, no more than at best a book-keeper. A bally clerk, who affixed his moniker to budget papers handed him by Treasury. This makes him the Greatest Economist of the Universe! Careful, Peter, the other title claimant, Keating, knows how to bury snivelling liars.

Rudd’s stimulus package will fail

Rudd’s solution to the financial crisis and the recession is the discredited Keynesian one of swilling billions of dollars down a toilet bowl. In this he has the full support Treasury Secretary Dr Ken Henry who argued that Rudd’s spending binge would prevent the economy from stalling. According to Henry’s fallacious economic thinking… 

… economic illiterates… while Henry is nothing but a vulgar little Keynesian whose lousy economics — that are also shared by officials at the Reserve Bank of Australia — are in grave danger of making matters much worse than they would otherwise be.

Obama’s ugly movie

“Back to the Rooseveltian future with knobs on“. As today, back then the Depression was blamed on free market economics, when it was monetary expansion and Hoover’s hostile to free markets policies that cooked things. Firmly pinning, though falsely, the 1925 depression to free markets, Roosevelt intensifed what Hoover initiated and so wiped out more capital on a tremendous scale. Thus, he also threw millions more Americans onto the stinking heap of the unemployed.

Obama is doing it all over again, so is Rudd, and both ably abetted by bureaucrats in the respective Treasuries and Central Banks. This is the stuff of teeth chattering apprehension.

Markets told Obama and the U.S. Democrats, “Sod off.”

It came as no suprise when the markets dived the vertical on the election of Obama. The moron only has to open his mouth and they dive again. They did it yesterday, an enraptured response to his first “State of the Union Speech” before Congress.

Rapture? Oh, that was city men glued to their trading screens and wondering how long can a man endure free fall. Obama keeps this up and he’ll set a new record in smashing stocks by wind alone. But it’s not wind alone, it’s filled with the promise to destroy Americans economically, and security wise too.

President Bush opened up America’s frozen wateland to oil companies. The reserves (oil discovered and developed to date) makes the Middle-East reserves look like a glass of beer. There is also oil off California and in the Gulf of Mexico. All this before new discoveries are made. Australia has good oilfields too, but rotten politicians made it a criminal offence to develop some of them.

Obama has decided to wipe out the new oil fields. On top of ruining Americans with a $U.S. 3 trillion  piss up - Obama adds to it faster than a taxi meter each day he wakes up in the morning, he is going to make sure they are done proper with capital destroying taxes. Green policies destroy and kill.

Obama will have rivers of blood on his hands. The New York Times endorsed the bombastic demagogue’s grand plans summed up in an Orwellian clanging note, Obama Vows, ‘We Will Rebuild’ and ‘Recover’.

He must have been alluding to his mouth. It wobbles and falls all over the place, and the plasterers have to pack it together again.

Oh, there is a rump of Democrats discontented with Obama’s “wipe ‘em out” vision. Carefully examined, however, their principal objection is, Obama’s spend-up should include their pet ‘projects’. One opined,

“We’re just told how to vote. We’re treated like mushrooms most of the time.”

What else is to be done with mushrooms, pet them?

In the mean-time, this is what one has been thumping for some years now:

Japanese: U.N. Man-Made Global Warming Theory Like ‘Ancient Astrology’

What needs to be added is the singular point:

It is also a belief in magic. Man controls and manipulates climates by Co2 emissions. This is no mere attack on science. It is mind-numbingly infantile and moronic. Mind, not onlythe diseased Left but also Australia’s right is committed to congenital infantilism. The Right’s scientific reasoning is, however, quality: they are self-styled blue bloods and they aspire to obtain billions of dollars through larceny.

Modest people and the markets are not disturbed for no reason.  Bernanke and Glenn Stevens couldn’t face economists who have a grip. Glenn Stevens and Dr. Henry King, unlike Bernanke, can weild the whole of the RBA and Treasury against a formidable army of two men. They are at Brookesnews. Then, it can be safely assumed, Stevens knows this and, no doubt, Dr. Henry King does too.

Say Liberal Party insiders, who are thoroughly dismayed by and ashamed of what the Right has done to the Party and Australians. 

Turnbull: an economic ignoramus. A ‘deep watermelon red’ greenie hugger, who would enrich his Right-wing pals through carbon taxation and destroy Australians, with the help of  juvenile delinquent Reg Hunt.

Brendan Nelson (I won’t address him by his title, Dr.): A man who smears Australian men under arms.

Nelson has the wrong handle on this. The men are forced to treat civilians as holding the ranks of soldiers. An administrator, with two clerks under them, has the rank of major. It’s across the public service.

Genuine public servants, as opposed to bureaucrats, are thoroughly ashamed of this abuse, as some have told me. Believe me, they avoid to the extent they can any occasion requiring compliance with the abuse. They do enjoy telling dirty jokes about conceited cretins puffed up by their hero status. 

The putsch for this disgracful insult to the Armed Forces of Australia commenced in the 1970’s. I know this because family acquaintances on the inside told us. The Hawke Government commenced imposing it in about 1985, from memory.

The public and the media, and politicians howled for the blood of a combat Major who properly refused to salute and address a civilian as Major, at a conference held in Melbourne. Nelson doesn’t see it is a bloody disgraceful insult. It’s clearly nothing to do with doing their duty as ordered by Cabinet to defy twerps.

Both ALP and the Right have happily politicised defence, amplified by what Blair and Gordon have done to the British aremed forces. Morale isn’t running high there, reflected in senior officers having said a few hard truths in public.

It shows in the disgusting record of selection of weaponry for the Armed Forces:

- The “Kock-up” sub, a steel coffin, acquired by Beazley, when the superior U.S. nuclear submarine of the day should have been purchased.

- The early model, flawed Abram Battle tank, which ensures no driver can escape a burning tank alive when the cupola is any degree forward of 45 degrees. When. the latest model, which is great, is available. It would take the men of 1^st armoured, however, to decide which make of tank to take into battle, and not “politicians” and “politicos”. Right-wing Ministers, including Senator Nick Minchin, were involved in this act of bastardry. What for? To save money to piss it on vote buying spending binges and on “alternative energy” scams. 

- What about also, for instance, infantry regiments. Why shouldn’t they be allowed to select their own weapons, rather than endure the “politics”.

The lives of men under arms depends on their equipment and weaponry, as opposed to the lives of gutless parasites called politicians and bureaucrats.

Other abuses includes cutting their pay by selling housing of as ‘investments’ and so ‘leased’ back to servicemen. This is what ‘privatisation’ and not genuine free market reform is about. Housing already paid for by taxpayers as a propercomponet of servicemen’s pay, and the lousy bastards in both major parties cheated both brave men and taxpayers, again.

Even cutting privileges and conventions of the armed forces is abusing them. Nelson is wrong. He’s just another thug abusing the honourable men of the Armed Forces of Australia.

Turnbull’s ‘wipe em out with carbon taxes’ position also means, Australians will not be able to support an effective Armed Forces. No capital, no supply, and it is as simple as that but, sadly, this is too difficult for the Right and their clunker tanks the CIS and IPA to grapple with.

Turnbull and Nelson typify the Right. They are disgusting, callow bastards. The Right-wing MPs must be slung out of Parliament, and States’ Parliaments, they are a disgrace.  Turnbull and the Costello-Kroger gang can be frog-marched out first and flung into what metaphorically they also are, sewers full of stinking shit.

Military ‘reluctant to take orders’

 26/02/09

Former coalition defence minister Brendan Nelson has accused the military of being reluctant to take orders from its civilian masters.

Dr Nelson’s comments have provided support to his Labor successor Joel Fitzgibbon, who is involved in a political row with military chiefs over the SAS soldier pay bungle.

He’s told the Sydney Morning Herald that the defence department’s military staff find it difficult to follow directives from their civilian colleagues.

The row surfaced after special forces soldiers returning from Afghanistan found themselves subject to debt recovery action by the Defence Department after being overpaid.

This cheddar cheese for brains twerp can’t fathom why men in service might be reticent. Let’s help him out. Warfare is the business of men under arms. The conventions and work they do is their business. The equipment they need is their business. Operational secrets are their business. It is also because of types like Nelson, Beazley, and Minchin and what they have done to the Armed Forces and what they turned the Department of Defence into.

He threw a tantrum and smeared real heroes before a very pleased “Saddamite Times“. What a gutless little skunk he truly is.

Senior Liberal Party members are appalled, absolutely, at the sheer extent of the treachery of the Right, as disclosed in the article immediately below, “Scoop…”

Writing up other items for today, some searches along the way, threw up reinforcing material. So, we’ll defer those other items, and put an expansion on a detail in “Scoop…”,

The Hugh Morgan - Greg Lindsay connection

The Centre for Independent Studies was set up for Greg Lindsay by Hugh Morgan, with John “the one armed bandit” Hyde (because single armedly, but with some help from Des Moore - one armed bandits do need a little bit of pulling to bleed the wallet dry, he nearly bankrupted the IPA) as go between. Oh it’s no secret.

Lindsay was quickly cash-strapped when he decided to quit the loathsome slog of school teaching for the greater hardship of owning his own well appointed Club for Mendicants ‘free market think tank’. Hugh Morgan aka “The WMC Mauler” came to his rescue. Morgan had a habit of indulging, at the expense of WMC shareholders:

He indulged a diseased leftist by putting her on the payroll. He indulged Clubmen Mendicant thinkers, putting one on the WMC payrol, which is related in an article covering Morgan’s economic illiteracy, hypocrisy and contempt for others;

Workplace reform, Hugh Morgan’s arrogance and executive pay

He became a very good pal to Greg Lindsay, way back in 1979. He even, on top of his heady day job of destroying WMC, worked as Lindsay’s salesmen drumming up heads od other companies to throw shareholders’ funds into Greg Lindsays’ club.

In an interview, Counterpoint, 1st of May, 2006, Lindsay declared:

Michael Duffy: So, Greg, where does the money come from?

Greg Lindsay: The money comes from people like you, Michael, and people like Paul. No, we have hundreds and hundreds of individual and corporate and foundation supporters, roughly a third each proportionately. It’s philanthropic. In other words, they can’t ask us for anything; they send in their cheque, they get a receipt and a warm inner glow (I hope) and over time that’s proved to be the case. We’ve never committed ourselves to do anything for any of our supporters.

He got three things right back then. It’s “philantropic”, and despite its claim to being a free market think tank, they have done nothing at all for the donors. And, never have been “committed” to even a smidgeon of the work required to justify their upkeep. How good is that! No wonder they sneer at ‘dole bludgers’, there must be someone out their who is inferior (oh dear, this is the topic of one of the deferred items).

Then someone else turns up. Morgan’s mate, Champion de Crespigny. Surprise surprise, de Crespigny isLindsay’s mate too.

How many insiders are there in the CIS?

Morgan, Peter Yates, and his connection brother OliverYates, and de Crespigny. Oh, and John Hyde. It’s nice to be among friends, in nice clubrooms, paid for out of hapless shareholders’ funds.

A Nuclear Connection

It’s energy and it is alternative, and these are already hooked into it - it must be economic if these fun lads brighten up:

Champion de Crespigny

De Crespigny was Executive Chairman of Normandy Mining Limited, he founded it in 1985. It was taken over by Newmont Mining in 2002.

Member of the Foundation Council of Australian Davos Connection, he is also a board member of, dah dah, Centre for Independent Studies

Another common link with Hugh Morgan is the BCA, and Minerals Council of Australia, amongst other affiliations.

A Grand Slam: Champion de Crespigny is also a 40% shareholder in the “Ronnie” Ron Walker- Hughie “The Mauler” Morgan ‘nuke em into the ground power company’, Australian Nuclear Energy Company, which, to repeat, was set up in 2007.

Did Greg Lindsay know before 2008 what the force of  carbon taxation is?

Lindsay is pals with first hand sources who were fully aware carbon taxation is destructive. This was not their concern. They wanted to become even wealthier than they are by politicians courteously sacking real businesses and modest Australians for billions and pouring the stolen proceeds into their bank vaults euphemistically called the  Australian Nuclear Energy company. Before banging down the hard evidence, a quick note.

In Scoop, it was raised as a piece of speculation that was not germane to the force of the disclosure, but I did mean it, under the subheading, Further remarks:

“Ron Walker and Hugh Morgan cannot, obviously, fund the Nuclear Power plant alone. Their issue of ‘capital’ partially reflects this, by a trivial amount. The preparation of the ‘company requires people far more competent than they are to establish its structure, through to logistical details.

It requires political co-operation and this means politicians Left and Right of the major parties. Not all in the ALP will support it and the Greens won’t, but they don’t have the numbers on this one.”

Bang on target and here is the smoking gun. Hugh Morgan shot it off in an interview he happily blessed The Age aka “The Spencer Street Soviet” with:

“Morgan reveals vision for Nuclear Australia“, 5/4/2007

Here are some choice quotes:

“FORMER mining executive Hugh Morgan has declared he is in the nuclear business for the long haul, and is considering opportunities such as power plants and waste dumps.

“In his first interview since news broke that he had formed an energy company with Fairfax chairman Ron Walker and fellow mining executive Robert Champion de Crespigny, Mr Morgan confirmed he was doing “preparatory work” to establish a nuclear business in Australia.

“Mr Morgan said the industry faced considerable practical and political hurdles…”

“Reports in February… Australian Nuclear Energy, planned to build nuclear power plants in Australia…[were] played down by company secretary Bruce Fitzgerald. But… Mr Morgan confirmed his company remained active…

But he said he was open to possible joint ventures with key players in the global nuclear business, such as Melbourne businessman John White, who pioneered the concept of nuclear fuel leasing.”

Ronnie and Hughie (fronting it), and associates were not wasting any time. They were already hard at it trying to ready their ‘company’. LAready politically pushing for ‘carbon tax destruction day’, in order to get their scam up.

It get’s better. Behind the scenes they were already engaged in political lobbying. In the course of it, they dragged the Prime Minister into it, which caused. I remember it, as I was listening to Parliament at the time, and the report it turned on. Now we know what was behind it.

“Revelations of the company’s existence(Australian Nuclear Energy) caused an uproar in Federal Parliament, with Prime Minister John Howard revealing that he had a discussion with Mr Walker about the company days before he announced an inquiry into nuclear power.

“The inquiry, conducted by former Telstra chief Ziggy Switkowski, predicted that Australia could have 25 nuclear reactors producing a third of the country’s electricity by 2050.”

This is real political muscle, with heavy artillery Ziggy for back up.

Hugh Morgan demanded in 2007 economic destruction

Of coal based energy companies and pauperisation of millions of Australians. It’s in the interview and here is the evidence:

“He said for Australia to embrace nuclear energy, consumers would have to accept that energy prices would rise as part of any policy change to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

“He said governments might have to review regulations governing Australia’s electricity industry because there was no functional national electricity market and energy companies were reluctant to invest.”

Why were they reluctant to invest/ Because Nuclear is not economic in Australia, and in a free to relatively open market, investors would see any capital they sunk into nuclear power obliterated.

Notice:

- Morgan called on the Cabinet to use coercion to confiscate capital and have it transferred into His, Ronnie’s, and their mates’  nuclear power company.

- Morgan called on the Cabinet to use measures approaching totalitarian to achieve the above, and also to deliberately wipe out capital in the coal based companies. In otherwords, destroy outright property rights - this from a man who whined when his property rights are threatened and when those of firms he has interests in. Bye, the bye, it is not novel, it’s not the first time Hugh Morgan considered it trivial wiping out the rights of others when it came to his and his pals’ interests. Ditto Ron Walker, whose own record is solid evidence.

Next, destroy outright the tremendous, capital intensive capital structure that drives coal based energy production. Production that has absolute economic advantage.

He called on the Cabinet to reduce employees of the coal based companies to poverty, to deliberately immiserate them. It follows from the above.

This callous bastard saw nothing wrong in making those criminal demands. He saw nothing wrong with Cabinet, mere politicians aiding him and his pals commit such grotesque crimes. They still see nothing wrong in it. They still demand it be done.

Now I understand what Morgan and his mates, and also those in the HR Nicholls Society mean by labour market reform, and darn, I am right. It is about coercing labour and to work for far below market rates. The last thing this lot are for is genuine free markets (which is pertinent to an item to be put up tomorrow).

Greg Lindsay is caught out in a grotesque fraud that will ruin Australians

As observed in “Scoop…”, the only possibility that could render a claim in Lindsay’s proganda case for carbon taxes true is nuclear energy. I am referring to, of course, the claim; transfers and tax cuts can absorb and eliminate the costs. However, it is not necessarily true, because of the tremendous economic carnage shifting to the ‘alternative’  will cause.

Next, he has asserted all along that carbon taxes can make ‘alternative energy competitive’. This is partly true, in so far as the absolute advantage of coal is wiped out to the point they are destroyed. Yet, it is a lie. The fact that it requires deliberate, coercive destruction of coal ased companies, and forcing energy prices shy high shows it is a lie.

Forcing prices sky high also shows that what is entailed is a massive cut in energy supply. This will destroy many an other company. It also means deprivations for consumers. We saw in the heatwave that Bracks and Brumby killed Victorians because they have successfully sliced coal based production in Victoria.

Greg Lindsay is at the centre of a monstrous, criminal fraud

What else can it be called in view of all the above. Greens’ policies kill and destroy. It’s not, perversely, the Greens who are imposed them. Mainstream politicians did and they have blood on their hands on this count and should be brought to justice.

What Lindsay is pushing will destroy on a large scale. It also can kill. He’s not disturbed by this monstrous and criminal force of what he is campaigning for. It does not disturb Walker, Morgan, and those tied in with them. They all don’t give a fig about the pain and carnage they (and cooperating politicians) will be responsible for, because they are going to get wealthier by billions of dollars through larceny.

That’s right, Greg Lindsay, larceny. And to get away with it requires politicians who will assert coercive power that is not far short of totalitarian.

Ladies and gentlemen, it is, to presume, becoming very clear why my City source, figures in business, are very angry. It is why they informed me of what Walker, Morgan and Lindsay cooked up. Principled businessmen, men of integrity, who know exactly what the Right’s rotten thuggery will mean not simply for their firms, but for all Australians and from within the framework of free markets and what it also generates, the Rule of Common Law.

They are disgusted at the Rights’ ( as well as the hard Left’s) sheer contempt for decent Australians. They could stomach no more abuse, they had to act, and Ron Walker, Hugh Morgan and Greg Lindsay showed them why they had to act, and why I am humbly ( genuine humility, readers) acting by writing this all up.

Yes, it looks very much so that Greg Lindsay knew even before 2008 what carbon taxation meant and what it will do to Australians. Yet, he was prepared to betray them, as well as the Liberal Party, and I mean genuine Liberals and not the corrupt, venal, Right strangling it and ably helped by the CIS and IPA, for the perpetration of an appalling, genuinely criminal fraud against Australians and their inalienable rights, their freedoms, their lives, their aspirations. He supports paupersing them and enslaving them, slaves to a pack of gangsters.

He believed this could be kept concealed, at least until it was too late? It looks very much so that his pals did. What a pack of insular, shallow, callow, stupid dole-bludging bastards they really are. Parasites, bloody psychopathic parasites.

As I say to Lindsay that I’ll retract if he publicly deniesy it, but first, I’d have to confer with my very angry, heavyweight sources. They aren’t for quitting.

They wouldn’t like me to quit. I am not for the quitting. They know I have the guts not to quit, and to fight and this is why we had a nice, fascinating chat. I’m sure readers can now fully agree, it was a most fascinating chat. An eyeball popper of chat - I know, mine popped and hit the ceiling with a few well chosen adjectives following them.

Consider, Lindsay, all those decent Victorians ruined/killed these last few weeks by politicians and their “Greens’ Policies”.The survivors do want them tried for these crimes. This is no joke, nor invention, Lindsay. The lynching party, victims and decent Victorians, wants justice done.

Right now, the above evidence taken with what was related in “Scoop…” is adding to their irritation, and to the anger of many decent Australians. That word, teachery, it has a certain ring about it.

Concealment follows from, they are the culprits. Genuine Liberal Party and heavyweight businessmen are disgusted and rightly angry. It is known in the City.

I’m only stating what I was told. My City sources are serious, decent, principled, and they are firm in their resolve.

Background

Greg Lindsay’s decision to lobby for carbon taxes stank of conflicts of interest right from the beginning. It was easy to identify two of them:

- Mr. Peter Yates, a Director of the CIS, and a Director of the Peony Company based in Hong Kong. The Peony Company was set up to cream up from Governments imposing Greenies’ policies, summed up in that nasty little piece of paper called the ‘Kyoto Treaty’, from companies forced to comply and that means to the losses of investors in those companies and their customers.

- Mr. Oliver Yates, brother of Peter Yates, and head of Macquarie bank, which also has a large exposure to ‘alternative energy’ scams in overseas companies . Those scams are possible only because of Governments and the absolute subsidisation of them via direct transfers, forcing firms to buy the nominal only supply from them, and taxing customers for good measure. This is what the Left and the Right in Victoria cooked up between them under Steve Bracks, bye the bye on ‘alternative electricity supply’.

It remained an open question as to who else could be behind his and the CIS’ campaign. The interests represented by the brothers Yates do stand to receive tremendous sums should carbon taxation proceed. There is only one way it can proceed, Government coercion. This also shows how risible the CIS’ claim to be ‘Australia’s leading free market think tank’ is (the IPA, funnily enough, makes the same claim).

In the initial CIS ‘policy’ advocacy paper, Lindsay declared true the Greens’ lies – Co2 is a poison and causes climate to change and, therefore, must be arrested. He then asserted carbon taxation can be rendered costless, through income transfers and tax cuts. That, destroying coal based, efficient energy companies through carbon taxation would make ‘alternative energy’ efficient. Thus he ran two false arguments as “science” and “economics”.

Jackson thoroughly demolished Lindsay’s lobby ‘case. The dis-economies of scale of alternative energy are tremendous that their value is zero. More is involved.

Jackson demonstrated that the cost of alternatives are so great that the impact would be mass economic destruction (- my words, not Jackson’s, who strictly argues from within economic terms). Consider it, coal based companies wiped out, all the capital required destroyed. More capital destroyed by pouring it down ‘alternative energy scams’.

Carbon taxes and Keynesian insanity

Why is the Centre for Independent Studies supporting the destructive carbon tax?

Why a carbon tax would hit living standards

Why a carbon tax is a direct attack on living standards

In due course, I put up a building mountain of evidence from overseas confirming the impact of carbon taxes on capital. The core arguments used to justify them in, eg., the UK, were the same as asserted by Greg Lindsay.

During that phase of the debate, Lindsay’s response to Jackson was to have him smeared.

There was something else. In March, I drew attention also to the Hugh Morgan-Ron Walker Nuclear Power Company. They launched it in a garden-stop press conference early the previous year. I referred to it during the initial debate over Lindsay’s position:

Then, there is the common denominator between the CIS, the IPA, HR Nicholls Society, and Melbourne’s right-wing, who have thoroughly wrecked the Victorian Liberal Party, it’s called a Hugh Morgan. Now we have a second, common denominator, it is called a Professor Sinclair Davidson.

The first link has a chain attached to it called the Ron Walker-Hugh Morgan Nuclear Power Company. To date, I am unaware of any other nuclear power company in Victoria or anywhere else. This is very important. Before proceeding with this un-amusing rumour, a few more questions of Professor Sinclair are in order.

[Could the CIS be involved in a major scandal and trying to cover it up?]

As everyone in Victoria knows, Ron Walker is bosom buddies with those leftist thugs inhabiting the Treasury benches, Spring St., Bracks and Brumby and co. Bracks is now an adviser to Rudd, and Brumby has his ear too.

We know what Walker and Morgan want, and we know what the CIS has published. This is besides the Yates’ interests, which will turn to gold in Australia once Rudd rams down his carbon tax.

It’s no longer a conjecture, and it is worse than a cover up. I had my finger on what is the motivation last year, only as a kernel of the truth and didn’t realise it. Though I mentioned the Ronnie -Hughie ‘nuke em into the ground company’ in some subsequent articles, I didn’t press it further than that. Lindsay’s position, ‘alternative energy ‘ taken at face value, doesn’t lead to a strong conclusion in the correct direction.

All that could be remarked was, they could benefit from carbon taxation. Bad enough in itself, this from two self styled “blue-bloods”, Liberal Party members and wreckers of it, and in Morgan’s case, also destroyer of WMC and the fight for free labour markets, resulting in Rudd.

In the above article, something else was covered under the section, “Back to Professor Sinclair Davidson” - “Sinclair has been mounting arguments for carbon taxes all along”.

One particular passage quoted in the article contained a hint of something, and it occurred to me then that it reads like a case of hand wringing, ‘what shall do we do for alternative power’. The only type that could do some of the job is nuclear power. One couldn’t say that it was even implied.

Coal based energy has an absolute advantage over nuclear power. I’m not against nuclear energy per se. I am against the economic force of imposing it. If it is not economic in free markets, it is not economic if it is imposed by Government and built on subsidies. It also means government fiat, backed by coercive forced asserted by mere mortals called politicians to do this.

Here is the rub: it is certainly not costless, but the increased cost of nuclear power might be compensated for by transfers. This is not the same as stating they certainly can be. Don’t forget, all pay is generated out of production. Destroying the coal based companies and the extensive, capital intensive, production structure this would entail is an instant impoverishment of Australians, from the modest earner to firms.

It also entails a massive forced transfer of capital into nuclear power and the production structure required to support it. On top of this, because nuclear power against coal is not efficient, customers from wage earners to firms will be hit with high cost energy. This can destroy firms since energy is an input and they need high capacity supply at low prices to remain in business.

What it means is a reduction in living standards by a very large factor. Nonetheless, it can be true the costs, at least some of them, can be neutralised by transfers. However, this was not the case Greg Lindsay ran through his CIS paper and subsequent statements.

The Scoop

Hugh Morgan and Ronnie Walker support and fuel the political putsch for the imposition of carbon taxes and with one aim: To make themselves wealthier, courtesy of politicians taking via taxation multi-billions of dollars from real enterprises and modest Australians and stuffing it into their nuclear power plant.

The reasoning is straightforward. The other types of ‘alternative energy’ are simply not conscionable. “Kyoto compliance’ means substituting nuclear energy for coal. They set up the first ‘Nuclear Power Company’, and issued shares in it.

Their position is not about whether the Green’s lie is a lie or not. The motivation is to make themselves wealthier than they already are. They needed a smokescreen. Greg Lindsay was happy to oblige, and he delivered.

What is the pay off Greg Lindsay? The CIS is his super fund. Neither he, his CIS, and the Kemp family and their cash box do anything unless ‘donors’ pay them to do it and then, when they have collected the loot, they still don’t anything. This time, it was different. Greg Lindsay acted.

Lindsay published a worse than usual bad CIS paper, so shot full of scientific and economic falsehoods that he risked public humiliation and he got it. At the time, he refused to concede Jackson’s criticism is solid. Kevin Rudd and the Cabinet used exactly the same ‘arguments’ Lindsay set out in that Ron Walker-Hugh Morgan carbon tax campaign launch paper. The Hansard record, as observed at the time, contains the evidence. Now we know why and there’s a twist to this.

Lindsay has been leant on. Various parties, Left and Right, are panicking at the growing revolt of modest Australians against carbon taxation and for the reason, they are beginning to appreciate the ‘rationale’ is a great lie, the Green’s anti-science lie, and the price is their ruination and, as the recent blackout in Victoria and the fire-storms show, they murder people.

What Hugh Morgan and Ron Walker see is their ‘get wealthier quick fast by billions of stolen dollars from all other real enterprises and millions of modest decent Australians scheme’ swiftly evaporating. (Remember, this is what heavy-weights in the City made plain). A change of tactics were required, and Rudd needed it too.

Maintaining carbon taxes are costless, and does not destroy capital but leads to an even wealthier future was not only indefensible in the first place. It has become politically suicidal to maintain it. Even Rudd’s Commissar of Greens’ policies that destroy, Penny Wong, is panicking over the revolt of those smelly oafs called modest Australians and screaming for a new brainwashing pogrom.

Greg Lindsay has come to the rescue again. That’s why he came up with:

Heating up the debate on climate change policy, 18/02/09).

In this propaganda article, Lindsay says, yes, Jackson is correct, carbon taxation destroys capital and so immiserates Australians. All this time, right at the beginning, he knew Jackson had nailed it with solid economic reasoning. He also knows the mountain of hard evidence piling up overseas, and in Victoria, confirms the force of Jackson’s case and that it is rock solid. Now he says, Jackson is absolutely correct. He is pulling a trick, a feeble one at that:

“Yes, we must bring modest Australians into our confidence,” meaning the Right and the hard Left led by Rudd pretending to take the modest man seriously. “We must be frank. Pretending it will be nice is immature. We must face up to the hard future. The Green’s claims are true and we must act. We can do this.” He continues, tax cuts and income transfers will compensate and absorb the blow of carbon taxes.

At face value, no they won’t. Carbon taxes destroys capital, and the killer blow is the destruction of specific capital combinations, coal based energy firms, which thus destroys all other firms and immiserates Australians because efficient supply of energy has been wiped out. There is the deception, the unsaid option that might but might not make the claim true, if and only if the ‘alternative’ used is nuclear power.’

Lindsay right from the first, in 2008, to the latest tactics, has been cautious in never stating the Hugh Morgan-Ronnie Walker Nuclear Power company is the solution that might make the claim true. Oh, the reason is transparent.

He can’t risk being pinned for freely and contentedly engaging in the political push to impose carbon taxes. Nor his mates, Ron Walker and Hugh Morgan and the motivation; it will enrich his mates who will, if it does go ahead, enrich him. He can’t chance anything that will pin the lot of them for what they are doing and what they are, and their political push to realise it. Oh, dear, they are.

Further remarks

Ron Walker and Hugh Morgan cannot, obviously, fund the Nuclear Power plant alone. Their issue of ‘capital’ partially reflects this, by a trivial amount. The preparation of the ‘company requires people far more competent than they are to establish its structure, through to logistical details.

It requires political co-operation and this means politicians Left and Right of the major parties. Not all in the ALP will support it and the Greens won’t, but they don’t have the numbers on this one.

Walker is mates with Bracks and Brumby and they are all intimate pals with Rudd. Kroger and Costello control the Right in what is left of the Liberal Party, and the Right at Federal and State level have given their strong support all the way, in and out of office, to Greens’ policies that destroy and kill, and with it, the usurpation of the Rule of Common Law and its foundation, inalienable property Rights; the ground of capitalism.

The Right is united in it, as N.S.W. led by Turnbull shows. There are useful idiots from elsewhere such as Chris Pyne. They only divide in their internal power play spats.

They are at one with the diseased and hard Left on it, with Bracks, Brumby and Rudd. Their record shows it, as indeed my reports on the OPA and STO is but one confirmation in a long list of evidence.

The upshot

Ron Walker, Hugh Morgan and Greg Lindsay, are prepared to see many Australians, ruined and even killed with Greens policies, because they will become wealthier than they are already. They have nothing to fear, they believe. It is treachery against Australians and Australia, a cold-blooded contempt for Australians.

Hugh Morgan destroyed WMC that was set to become an international major. He put a diseased Greenie Leftist onto WMC’s payroll for good measure. He, with Kroger, Costello, Minchin, Ray Evans and Des Moore, destroyed the fight for free labour markets. Then, they weren’t for free labour markets:

They meant ‘reforming’ employees, forcing modest Australians to do what they are told, and take what the likes of Morgan et al capriciously decide to pay them, a massive pay cut and, by gum, that’s what the Hughie-Ronnie Nuke em into the ground company entails.

They are also abusing the Liberal Party to shield themselves. Having swiped it from genuine Liberals, they have stuffed offices, and Parliamentary seats with a combination of henchmen, and useful idiots such as Greg Hunt and Scott Ryan, Petriou and Minchin. To make sure of their political control in Parliament, they jobbed in Helen Kroger. Costello, on the Kroger plan, is waiting for others in the Parliamentary Party to come crawling to him and make him Deah Maximus Leadah, which Andrew Bolt covered for this week on radio.

They are prepared to betray companies to enrich themselves. They are prepared to betray, immiserate, pauperise millions of Australians. They are prepared to support coercion, nothing less than increasingly totalitarian measures against Australians, so that each of them can enrich themselves.

Ladies and Gentlemen, this is not a joke. It is not a counter-factual scenario. It is what was told to me by senior figures in the City who know the inside of what the Right is doing. Andrew Bolt and Tiny Tim Blair fly cover for them, interference, and protect them.

Nick Gruen of the CIS advises Kevin Rudd. Nick Gruen, as we have had cause to observe in the first item of today, is not fighting for free markets as it is. He is helping the Rudd Cabinet to commit economic larceny as it is. He doesn’t defend free markets in his articles either. He attacks free markets by promoting Keynesian snake oil. On top of which, for good measure:

The IPA has kept a low profile in this. Alan Moran is one of the ‘brightest’ they have, which is no recommendation at all. But he knows Jackson is rock solid but he doesn’t have the guts to admit it. The IPA is owned, after all, by the Statist, “watermelon hot reds” the Kemp family, which is why that Che Guevara-Adolf Hitler loving brat called Chris Berg is its editor. The Right own the CIS and IPA through Lindsay and the Kemps. They are all willing to destroy the liberal Party and Australians because, it’s all about them, their bank vaults and power for themselves

This plot have the hide to attack the hard Left. I hate the diseased Left, but the Rights’ claim to be the dreaded foe of the Lefts, is black joke. They are no better. In the matter of Greens lies and Greens polices they are cooperating with the diseased Left.

Treachery? Corruption? Oh, gentle readers, this is only the first article on this. Take it as read, this will be going all around Melbourne and Australia. These bastards have to be strung up. Well, to these crimes they have blood on their hands, they are as culpable as the Left of destroying the property of Victorians and killing hundreds of them with Greens’ polices.

Yes, here we have the front men, Walker, Morgan and Lindsay for a sleazy betrayal of Australians that they believed they could keep secret until it was too late and irreversible. To this, they are happy to co-operate with States and Federal Politicians in wiping out rights and imposing coercive measures against real forms and Australians. They happily cooperate with diseased Leftists, and promote their lies in order to enrich themselves. I’m only stating what I was told.

Why and who had to be concealed, using the  CIS as a front. This lot presumed they could keep their machinations secret, at least until it was irreversible  - coal based energies destroyed and their ‘nuclear company’ “built”. That is how thick this lot are.

Sooner or later, Leftist journalists might have got wind of it, and perhaps they have but don’t have the sources to go to press on it yet. It was best it should have come out through a genuine Liberal, as told him by genuine, principled figures in the City. It’s obvious why; the Right have thoroughly discredited genuine Liberal Principles and the Liberal Party with it. Only the Right could be so stupid as to not realise what the Left, therefore, would do the Liberal cause if they could publish on it.

My mistake. It’s not the damage hard Leftist journalists could cause. Hugh Morgan, Ron Walker, Greg Lindsay, and their Right-wing mates have done it. This is how insular, callous, and stupid they are, matched by their contempt for all but themselves.

It reduces to ensuring sure the damage is sheeted home correctly, restricted to these Right-wing thugs. Secondly, the graver matter, which comes before the Liberal Party and its fate, is fighting to destroy the carbon tax, Green policies, psychopathic madness, and this is what these three, their backers, and the rest of the Right are as keen to impose on much abused Australians as much as the hard Left is.

Treachery, oh it is that. This lot of parasites need not look to the dictionary. It is the right adjective for what they have committed and continue to perpetrate.

As I say, it is as it was told to me by stern, firm, principled sources in the City. Anger is proper when it is righteous anger, and this is one more reason for modest Australians and genuine Liberals to be very angry.

It’s the title of a new documentary film. There is nothing new here. Contributors to Brookesnews have detailed the treachery of the Left dominated media, with the likes of Krugman chipping in to help his fellow travelling diseased Leftists. Here are some of the articles, 

The media bring down a curtain of darkness to protect Obama, by Olavo de Carvalho

The US recession and Obama’s destructive economic snake oil, Jackson, which relates the Democrats’ and their media protectors’ treatment of “Joe the Plumber”

The Joe-the-Plumber vote is bigger than you think, John Berlau

Obama’s campaign built on lies, Richard Baehr

Not that Leftist liars have had an easy time covering for Obama. Large wall posters of Che Guevara in his campaign offices sums up this treacherous fraud. It’s a blunt signal of what the Left dominated media is, and supported by treacherous Leftists in Hollywood. Mind, they cannot suppress all good people, such as John Voight, who had a few choice things to say in warning of the “Coming socialist America” and the Democrats propaganda and brainwashing machine working over-time to realise it:

Actor and patriot speaks out

What Obama is, is easier to read than infantile children’s books.

So,Obama, Hillary and Alinsky’s tactics, Kyle-Anne Shiver

Obama, Alinsky and the Marxist Left, Vincent Gioia 

So much before taking in his ‘economic’ progrom.

What is new about, Media Malpractice and how Obama got elected and Palin was targeted, is the footage of lying, Leftist journalists in action during the 2008 Presidential campaign. Reviewer John Nolte clarifies a singular point,

“… “Media Malpractice” is not anything close to an anti-Obama screed… but for you reasonable Democrats who were horrified by the media corruption even as it benefited your guy, there’s nothing to fear here…”

This is interesting,

Palin haters will be disappointed… Governor Ziegler has the Governor watch and comment on the harshest coverage she received… her impressive poise, good humor, and graciousness, while witnessing the lies and attacks on her family, remains intact… this vicious and partisan coverage… she hasn’t allowed it to get under her skin is obvious.”

The trouble is, the Republican Party is dominated by a ‘clique’ just as bad as the Australian Right. They strangled sources of advice genuine free market Bush needed. In the lead up and during the 2008 campaign they deliberately humiliated Bush. They deliberately set about undermining Palin. When it was over, they blamed Palin for the defeat.

The Right did not hit the diseased Left. Did not use the Party’s funds where it could be effectively applied to eviscerating Obama and his gang of thugs. Neither did they bother with principles and asserting them, and didn’t consider they had to bother convincing the modest voters. What makes this strange is, ulike the Australian Right, there are vigorous journalists and radio, attacking commentators and hosts, Rush Limbaugh being of course a famous example. Next, there are many Americans who are intellectually engaged, many of them in the Republican members who, as their Australian counterparts genuine Liberal Party members, are suppressed by a narrow clique.

The Left in America won by default, for the same reasons they are on top in Australia. There is, however, a difference. 

So called “Liberal” commentators and journalists are all part of the same, narrow, Right wing clique that has destroyed the Australian Liberal Party. As the clique in the Republican Party to Bush, they did not support John Howard when he was Prime Minister, and this condemnation does apply also to the CIS and IPA.

Indeed, the IPA dedicated its December 2008 edition to blaming Howard for all the havoc the Right caused, including defeat to that moron Kevin Rudd. The Right destroyed the sound case for free labour markets, by March 2005 and it was then that they had brought about the 2007 electoral defeat of Howard and the Coalition, which a high level research commissioned by the ACTU in 2005 demonstrated.

Andrew Bolt runs propaganda for interests hoping to enrich themelves via the capital destroying, food production destroying ethanol scam. He caused great damage to the cause of free labour markets. Now he has blamed victims for being victims of the bushfires, and he still won’t come out with the truth, Greens’ policies destroy and kill, and Right and Left politicians of the major parties imposed them.

Of course he won’t. It would mean going for the jugular of his Right-wing mates and he can’t do this. He’s in Kroger’s and Costello’s pockets. He’ still at it trying to massage the public into accepting Costello must be the next Dear Maximus Leadah as of fuedal right. There is something else that one will launch today.

Tiny Tim Blair won’t fearlessly attack Bolt, CIS, the Right for their actions either. He’s been adopted by them. (Blair and Bolt melted faster than butter). He has his reward, an open invite to Greg Lindsay’s famous barbecues where, surprise surprise, many of the Right gather. They live together, holiday together, and barbecue together.

For his amiable services to the Right as a ‘journalist’, the IPA had a number of  Tiny Tim Blair’s vapid best ‘articles’ entered into their “Library of Congress” as classics in economics, liberalism and literature. Heady stuff. Yes, Tiny Tim, as hinted at above, today I throw a bomb, and believe me the blast and the shrapnel, there won’t be many in the Right who survive it.

Chris Berg, editor of the IPA, which proudly boasts of his journalistic efforts and also adoringly published by The Age aka the “Spencer Street Soviet” such as, Berg in raptures over what wonderful, popular “icon” for teenagers Che Guevara is. How he hopes what Hitler and his regime were and did will soon be forgotten and take his place alongside Guevara as a teen idol, and that teens will wear the mugs of both proudly on their “t-shirts” and adorn their bedroom walls with posters of these monsters.

It is important to sum up Janet Albrechtsen’s sterling efforts. However, this requires attention. So, here are some examinations of how she gives hope to the diseased Left, and brings misery to genuine Liberals:

Janet Albrechtson: Lady Muck-raker and wannabe vicarious ruler of the

Albrechtsen decided in March 2008 she could eviscerate a joint report into the impact of labour market reform by Leftist economists Woonroy and Buchanan. She hit upon her killer argument,smear them. Rightwing Ministers, engaged their mouths and followed suit. To rescue mere defeat from disaster, the heavy water pistols of the Right-wing think tanks came to the rescue, for example:

Sinclair Davidson and Alex Robson did not demolish the Woonroy-Buchanan report. They helped a good cause.

Let’s take a look at a commentator, Nick Gruen. It is as well he is confined to the obscure magazine of the CIS and a blog site by and for, in the main, spoiled, callous, ignorant brats. In the main.

Intelligent, decent readers who have come across it have also, unquestionably, sized up what that lot are. Indeed, this was the real motive for joining debate there, as set out in, Reply to Kalecki. Krugman is wrong. It wasn’t merely to point out a few things. It was to hit them where it hurts, as it does for the Right, showing them up in public for the shallow, callow, conceited, sneering, brain-challanged, facile cretins that they truly are.

Ah Nick Gruen. I’d say, as dim as he is, he does appreciate a certain force of some comments, and appreciates readers, as dim as most of theirs are, appreciate it though groping in their hazy fog for the full reason why. It’s not simply his mistakes that one happily corrected. Those errors are only the tip of the iceberg, called, he has no grip at all on Austrian school theory at all. This is why can’t even nail Lovell and Kalecki, let alone Krugman. Greg Lindsay and his CIS proclaim Gruen as their in-house expert on “Hayek”. Someone has a sense of humour but it isn’t Greg Lindsay.

Gruen doesn’t have anything intellectual in common with the giants of Austrian school economics, and they include today Dr. Shostak and Mr. Jackson. He does have something in common with a former President of the Liberal Party,  John Valder - 

Australian Liberal Party bigwig calls the US a war criminal

And Julian “the Shitzeel” Sheezel. Several years ago, I was the guest of an honourable gentleman, who has served Australia in war, at a function commerating brave men. At the table was an elderly lady, some more heroes, and one  Julian “the Shitzeel”. “Shitzeel” proceeded to relate as in earbash the lady, approximately in her late 70’s, on why the war against Saddam and the National Socialist (Ba’ath party) regime was a crime. That Saddam had turned Iraq into a paradise and how the allies had destroyed. In short, he had rote learned the lies told by the “Spencer Street Soviet”.

Until this lot of murdering thugs emerged, Ba’ath, Iraq was a prosperous country. They reduced it to a hellhole. The French Socialist politicians equipped Saddam with an underground, nuclear weapons factory. Hussein turned Iraq into a vast, outdoor, Islamic- terrorist training camp, as also attested by an Iraqi colonel at war’s end. He used chemical weapons against villagers. Al Qaeda terrorists ran trials of chemical compounds on victims seized from villagers, and reported back to Saddam on the results, inclusive of live footage. Yet, not only Leftists in the media covered this up, in order to attack Howard and Bush, and to sap public confidence in the Armed Forces; Beazley and Rudd ran the Left’s lies, and accused Bush and Howard of Lying and leading Australia into an immoral war.

Here is Nick Gruen in action:

Gitmo: How do you want to be raped today?, by Nicholas Gruen, Wednesday, February 18, 2009.

Nick Gruen not only recites the lies told by treacherous Leftists. The evidence he relies on is from a hard left front, ”Iraq Veterans Against the War”, and one of its members,  Brandon Neely. Here is KX’s take on Neely’s evidence. Here’s a site of “Iraq Veterans Against the War” that reflects exactly what they are. Here’s an allied site that leaves no doubt what these fronts are for, to induce sedition, and worse in the armed forces. Try inducing volitionally enlisted, oath sworn servicemen into refusing to do their duty, obey orders, and mutiny, and it styles itself in a vile insult to honourable servicemen as, “Courage to resist” .  

What Gruen happily promotes, Neely’s ‘account’ is not torture. Those fronts invent propaganda sob stories to foment hatred of the Armed Forces, to sap morale, and, to repeat, induce serving men to mutiny. The following, Nick Gruen, is torture and it was related to my by an excellent source, who doesn’t require much tempting to do something nasty to types who see nothing in treacherously lying to the public, if it were not for a few restraining considerations:

Taliban and Al Qaeda take villagers to caves, anyone, men, women and children. They suspend their victims by hooks pierced into the skin and attached to caves’ walls. They then very slowly shred them to death with fine instruments. They proceed by commencing with slithering off the skin, to the final evisceration of the intestines of their many victims. This real torture is slow; the vermin take more than a few, slow hours to kill every one of their victims.

The above is not the worst of what they commit. The object of all this decency is, to show who is in charge, to keep villagers in their place. This is all besides the savagery of the defunct Taliban regime, and the Iranian Islamic regime, with even rape victims convicted under Shria Law and, buried up to their chest, stoned to death -girls and women.

The source is someone who has lead men for years hunting down the vermin, successfully too. 

 How many years ago was it, 8/10? A number of Muslims, approximately 30 of them, were released from Guantanamo Bay. They promptly rejoined terrorist cells. Until they were first captured, they were a terrifying danger to modest Iraqis and Afghanistanis. Vermin that allied soldiers risked death to fight and capture.  

David Hicks wasn’t a boy when he left to join Islamo-fascis terrorist cells in Europe, in Kashmir against India. Met up with Al Qaeda, and for his last effort joined the Taliban. Al Qaeda and Taliban have other nice habits, eg:

Executing anyone who defies shria by throwing them off heights, strangling them, stoning them, decapitating them, and amputating them.

Contrary, to the treacherous Leftist liars, immature Gruen prefers to believe, the vermin inside Gitmo were not tortured and were well looked after.

You see the problem, ladies and gentlemen? It’s fine to attack lying Leftists in the media. Geoff Elliot of The Australian is one, who also invented the lie Allied soldiers massacred Iraqis. They are not, however, an impregnable monolith. They are gutless. The only reason why they get away with it in Australia, it’s a different matter in the US, is the gutless, unprincipled Right.

The Right show themselves capable of and willing to descend to the depths of the treacherous Left. These brave know it alls have undermined and destroyed the Liberal Party, and its causes. They have cleared the field for the diseased Left to run riot. They are the reason why Rudd and his Cabinet of thugs and morons are in office.

Oh, and the above is another sure indication Gruen doesn’t know the seminal thinkers of the Austrian school. They would despise Gruen for his treacherous nonsense. Now, readers, all this leads up to something else that will be posted today:

It is explosive. I’ve been hunting the right track on a serious matter, but what was delivered to me I had not detected nor inferred. I’ve bided my time to write it up, the reason will be made evident. It is explosive.

It detonates on the treachery of the Right rather well, is consistent of them. It involves names. It involves the IPA, CIS, and Greg Lindsay. The list contains some of the who’s who of the Right. It is dynamite and it is my joy to detonate it. They will run for a bomb shelter, but it’s been blown up, what I have to report, ladies and gentlemen blew that up some time ago.

More insights into Nick Gruen’s economic shallowness

(When the Right “attack” the Left on economics, their standby argument is to sneeringly employ their No.1 argument, ‘they don’t get it, it’s Economics 101. The Right don’t get it either, 101 Economics is not economics, it’s textbook beginning and the standard textbook in Oz is a bad one. Does it show. Neelless to say, Gruen also reaches for the cliche clincher, 101.)

Costs and protectionism: another economic fallacy re-emerges

Economy swamped by confusion as money supply goes wild 

Australia’s plummeting jobless: miracle or good economics?

In a recent foray, Gruen swamps himself again. He and the Right really do need to attend to those who are economists, Shostak and Jackson, and here’s another item, that occurs to me for some reason in the connection, showing how feeble Gruen and the Right are. It is in two parts, Part I contains the link to Part II:

Productivity, wages and jobs — more economic stupidity from the media, part I

Well, Gruen is an ‘adviser’ to the Rudd Cabinet. He’s saying the right things. His “firm’s” website boasts of how they help firms ’through regulatory processes of government and how, using them, they can achieve optimal outcomes’, which put in plain English means real firms committing suicide. State and Federal Cabinets are thoroughly strangling firms and, hey, the victims should lend a hand; daft, right round the bend daft. But this, readers, also detonates on the bomb to be launched today.

As difficult as it might be to digest, this is the unvarnished truth. As it is, fire-storms still rage East of Melbourne, with towns such as Warburton on the edge of being wiped out.

The Otways nearly went up too

It hung in the balance of a matchstick’s worth of fuel, relatively speaking.

The Otways nearly went up during the fire-storms. It would have been a second Kinglake disaster, probably greater. It was a close run thing, nearly triggered by the Pomberneit fire that started in the ‘government owned’ jungle in the area. It was not started by an arsonist.

Grass fires on open pasture take time to develop because there is not much fuel. They can be stopped readily. It was a fireball that raced out of the jungle and hit the pasture land, on a broad front. Being pasture land it slowed somewhat. However, 10 men fighting to save a property nearly died. They retreated into a milking shed but, luckily, there was a sudden wind gust that split the fire and it rejoined on the other side of the shed.

On the Northern reaches,The Otway sleeping fire-storm begins in the area of Pomberneit, a few kilometres West of Camperdown, roughly 200 plus kms West of Melbourne, with a stand of trees about 800 to 1000 yards south of the Princess Highway, leading into the Otways impenetrable jungle.

The fire was travelling South and had entered the leading edge of trees on the rim of a slope leading up into the ranges. Impenetrable jungle all the way south and fanning out East and West right through to the coast. It is a vast area.

CFA ,and property owners and their employees had cut fire breaks and back burned but they could not stop the southerly drive of the fire. There was no way for them to get into the trees and fight. Then, a miracle happened.

Before the fire had penetrated too far, it had only hit a point of a leading outer rim of trees, a windshift occurred. It turned the fire back a hundred yards or so and it drove West to Camperdown and it was stopped because it was out on open farmland again. The men killed it.

I dropped into the Pomberneit CFA during the weekend and checked the above out. They also had aerial photos of some of the burned land. No house and plant was lost.

Two men were on duty when I visited the post. They also mentioned the fire had entered a peat deposit and this is still burning but is no threat. Other than this, the Pom. fire is out, though the men keep duty watch just in case. (Pomb. Was hit in 2006, again it came out of the govt. jungle. That fire, was lit by an arsonist.)

I asked them, just to check, “How did you stop the fire?” They replied, “We didn’t, we couldn’t, a wind change did it in the nick of time.” They were in now doubt as to what would have happened but for the miracle. They also said “it would have been another Kinglake.” No-one in the district is in any doubt it would have been at least as horrific as the Kinglake fire-storm. My view is, it would have been far worse, because of the territory the Otway sleeping fire storm covers, and reaches.

To be blunt, many people would have been killed in the towns and properties throughout the Otways. It’s a long drive out in any direction. The Kinglake fire storm raced at around 200kmph. A source told me, people in Kinglake, were warned of the approaching fire when it was spotted. A fire, say 20 km away means about an hour to prepare/leave. Not with what was not realised, a firestorm that can and did travel at 200kmph.

No chance to escape at all. So, in the Otways, towns such as Timboon would have been destroyed. Coastal towns, from east to West would have been in great danger too.

There is no way out fast. The jungle criss-crosses routes and strings of jungle connect jungle across roads pasture land. They are not out of the woods yet, so to speak, since this week will see hot temperatures and strong winds again.

The water bombing of the fire-storms such as Kinglake, did not work. Only one helicopter was capable of withstanding the tremendous forces generated out of the combination of wind and the fire-storm sucking in oxygen. “Elvis”.

Each load of water the pilot loosed, 50% instantly evaporated. The other 50%, therefore, would have also been wasted. The water-bombing was a 100% waste of water. This is the sum effect the pilot risked his life to achieve.

The Pomb. CFA and property owners were all relieved the wind change stopped the fire. There was no stopping it if it had gone some more yards. It would have taken firm hold and that would have been the end.

It had penetrated as it is, as an estimate, 10-30 yards into the rim where there is not sufficient ground fuel for propulsion, but impossible to fight in. 

Greens’ Policies destroy and kill. Mainstream politicians imposed them. Victorians were murdered, and this is beyond doubt. Oh, and country Victoria? Axes are being sharpened; this the politicians can be assured of. Well might they, with their Greens pals, hide, because country chaps enjoy hunting.

 And so too the inmates in his super fund named the Centre for Independent Studies.

To continue lobbying for capital destruction by carbon taxation. Not that Rudd needs encouragement, nor Turnbull. Rudd declared last week mid year 2010 is demolition day. Mind, as a self-styled free market think tank, the CIS, along with the IPA has caused great damage. The bright spot in the CIS carbon tax happy club society is, at least Lindsay has stopped pretending.

It must be observed that the CIS has conceded the Greens’ lie carbon emissions causes global warming/climate change. Consequently, it has joined the propanda hand wringing exercise of crying, “It’s true. What shall we do.” The question is what should donors, ie. companies, do to them? What should genuine Liberal Party members do to them, since the Right used this lot, along with the IPA and HR Nicholls Society as the sole source of advice? And, taxpayers, since they advised “Liberal” State and Federal Ministers and Cabinets? (Consulting fees still flow into the pockets of some of them courtesy of Rudd.)

Then there are the conflicts of interest. The Yates brothers and the Peking based Peony Co., set up to pocket a fortune out of carbon taxes, and Macquarie bank, whose balance sheets run red. Their ‘exposure’ to ‘alternative energy firms’ overseas is very suggestive of the reason for some of that lost blood.

Having taken a thorough pounding last year over their original position cum lobby paper for carbon taxes, they are at it again. Best of all, Lindsay and the CIS have used the same true believer to deliver their latest promotion effort, John Humphreys. If Lindsay wishes to send him out to receive anther beating, fine. As a rule, sadists are the sort that belong in prison, but there’s always an exception. Lindsay can keep throwing the cretin under a bus.

The inmates of the IPA and CIS are fond of pretentious title, and some even manage to fil their ‘articles’ with anachromisms. This is proof that they are erudite. So, in good style, wunderkind Humphreys concedes the Greens’ lie all over again, and stamps his little feet or, rather, Lindsay did, demanding, ‘we must have the right sort of carbon tax.’

Heating up the debate on climate change policy, John Humphreys (18/02/09).

Heat is a foreign concept to the Right, because they are iced deep under a polar ice-cap. The only different this time is, they are no longer asserting carbon taxes are “costless”.

Lindsay, the ‘conflicts of interests, his ‘guns’, and Humphreys, have at last conceded  carbon taxes destroys capital. The bad news is; ’so what’, they say, ‘let’s impose them and immiserate millions of modest Australians anyway’. Despite the admission, they still assert, even so, ‘tax cuts’ will offset the destruction of capital.

Not it does not compensate for destroying production, the whole point to the tax. The evidence rolling in from around the world only confirms this.  Or woudl Lindsay like to tell all those investors and their employees wiped out by carbon taxation they are only imagining their plight. Blair and Brown made the same types of promises, and wiped out companies and tens of thousands of employees within a matter of months of imposing carbon taxes.Nothing could save them from what the Blair and Brown carbon tax was aimed at,  specific capital combinations in energy production.

They, Blair and Brown killed efficient energy production. They smashed supply of energy to other companies. It crumpled those companies because energy is an essential input. Ha! The CIS asserted the tax would make ‘alternative energy’ efficient’. Well, Blair and Brown sacked taxpayers to fund those frauds 100%. The scams are so efficient all those companies and their employees were wiped out.  Companies overseas are still being destroyed because of carbon taxes, and tens of thousands thrown out of paying jobs by the month. This, before the recession on top!

What’s going on at the IPA and the CIS is a bloody disgrace. This lot don’t give a stuff about the genuine free market cause, truth in all things including science. They don’t give a stuff about the impact of worse than lousy ‘economics’ on modest, decent Australians. (What, show concern, to smelly peasants!). This wouldn’t be happening if our right were not running a closed shop, and that includes Tim Blair and Andrew Bolt.

Oh, what am I saying, the Right never gave a stuff about anything but themselves. Ssee what is wrong: if they were merely confined to themselves and in obscure occupations where they can’t cause great damage, it wouldn’t matter. They are not, they have, it does.

The rotten thing is the Right is still hard at it betraying the Liberal Party, genuine free market causes, and Australians and Australia for good measure. This lot have scored endless triumphs for the hard Left.