Reply to the Institute of Public Affairs
Friday, May 15, 2009
And one of its Directors, Mr. Roskam, and remarks on pertinent matters.
This lot of poltroonish clowns are the best allies the left could ever hope for.
Mr Roskam has misled Australians. Alan Woods cited Roskam in a column, ETS delay is not enough (The Australian, 8/5/09). First, a couple of notes on the following remarks by Woods:
Delaying the introduction of an ETS is a sensible decision…
There has been a rising chorus of complaint from business and Labor’s legislation faced certain defeat in the Senate. The Government has resorted to heavy political spin and artful manipulation of interest groups to minimise the damage. At his press conference, Rudd helpfully identified the groups the Government spent a lot of time massaging ahead of its announcement, to give it political cover for its embarrassing backflip.
These were, in order, the Business Council of Australia, the Australian Industry Group, the Australian Conservation Foundation, WWF, the Climate Institute, the ACTU and the Australian Council of Social Service.
The last five are obvious allies of the Government on climate change, if now somewhat disillusioned ones.
1/ If the ETS is good for Australians in 2011, then why delay? It is the rot Malcolm Turnbull spouts - ‘it must be done, it is the good thig to do but it must be introduced at 5 in afternoon instead of 6 in the morning’.
2/ The BCA and the Australian Industry Group have also sold out companies for lousy and worse policies and look at the company they keep - fronts run by hard, diseased Leftists.
What has to be kept in view are two things:
Carbon taxes destroys capital, a deliberately caused disaster from which Australians might not recover. It naturally follows that it is also the destruction of the capacity to supply and maintain the Armed Forces of Australia, leaving Australians defenceless. It is worse than a disaster. It will be a major crime perpetrated against Australians and to perpetrate it also requires assertion of totalitarian power against Australians.
Woods, in quoting Roskam, asserts the IPA is the shining exception to the abysmal conduct of the Right and business associations:
A few months ago John Roskam, executive director of conservative think tank the Institute of Public Affairs, posed some interesting questions: What are business organisations for? Do they exist so their chief executives can sit on government advisory boards and have afternoon tea at the Lodge? Or is their purpose to represent the interests of enterprises and employers?
Not the latter, it would seem. As Roskam also has observed, business is to blame for allowing the ETS juggernaut to progress as far as it has: “There’s not a single significant business association in the country that has opposed the notion that Australia should have an ETS.”
None has gone so far as the IPA in calling for the ETS to be scrapped in the absence of a comprehensive international agreement to reduce carbon emissions, and realistically there is not much chance of that.
Well, it is slightly true, given the BCA, AIG and CIS are doing their bit to run the propaganda campaign for carbon taxes. What Woods omits is, the IPA not only did not say much, if anything at all, against carbon taxation until 2008. Up until then, the IPA was running articles in its review on the right way to impose carbon taxes. It’s position since 2008 has been ambiguous, to say the least.
Some lacklustre articles by Alan Moran, in which Alan Moran stopped short in conceding Jackson is impeccably correct in his evisceration of carbon taxes from within a solid framework of capital theory. On the other hand, they run items such as the shallow, vulgar mush by Professor Sinclair Davidson and the editor of the IPA Review, Mr. Chris Berg, in which they conceded:
- Carbon emissions causes climate change
- Climate change so caused is a disaster that must be prevented
- Carbon emissions must be cut
What these two bilge pumps finally concedeed is that it is OK to destroy Australians by wiping out production via carbon taxes. The evidence confirming that that is the impact of carbon taxes is a Himalayas of evidence, but the CIS and IPA ignore it, as much as they have sought to silence those who have been fighting carbon taxes not since last year, but over a dceade ago.
These destructive concessions were made in the context of a paper in which Davidson and Berg effectively invited the Rudd Cabinet to impose industry policy (Kim Il Carr must have enjoyed it). They also added a novelty of their own; they denied the inverse of the J curve is a true theorem. Davidson is yet to produce a paper contradicting what is a hard truth. Jackson drew attention to the inverse of the J curve in a paper that razed the fallacies contained in their paper as a serious consideration.
Consider this: The IPA is the Kemp family’s fund. David Kemp, as a Minister for “The Environment” in the Howard Cabinet, was a green zealot who imposed many policies the Greens demanded and laid the foundations for Rudd to destroy capital through carbon taxes, and howled down anyone who stood up to him and told him he is committing a gortesque fraud against Australians. As Minister, he was responsible for stripping Australians via taxation and throwing the proceeds down the gullets of charlatans, ‘alternative energy’ frauds, and a rather long list of scams.. On top of this, the Kemps, being part of the Right, have also done their bit to destroy the Victorian Division of the Liberal Party, in line with Michael Kroger.
In 2008! The fight against Greens lies and policies began a couple of decades before then but the Right and their think tanks, the CIS, IPA and HR Nicholls Society made sure those who were doing the work were never given a public hearing and, crucially, never commended to Howard and Cabinet. The IPA, under Nahan, was also very nasty to scientists who offered their services pro bono to fight the lies. Moreover, those scientists know how to fight.’ We know why the IPA spat on them. They know talent means they are finished.
Instead, up until March 2008 the IPA was publishing vulgar papers pushing carbon taxation and only temporised this treachery in 2008. The reason can be readily inferred – the increasing numbers of firms who noticed and the risk of cuts in donations to the IPA this presented.
Their effort since March 2008 has been abysmally shallow and timid, and this is their regular, well maintained form in all grave matters. This alone makes Mr. Wood’s article look like a shabby advertising item promoting the IPA to potential donors against the CIS, BCA and AIG, and he is not the only one to do this. Mr. Andrew Bolt uses his columns to lobby for some types of carbon taxation -
- Ethanol, which destroys food production
- Destruction of coal based energy for nuclear power which is, surprise surprise, what Ron Walker, de Crespigny, Hugh Morgan and Greg Lindsay are pushing for.
- The IPA
What a cosy little club the Right is, Mr. Alan Woods, and incestuous too. The current Directors of the IPA include, Rod Kemp, John Roskam, William Morgan, and Andrew Bolt’s new pal, Michael Kroger.
William Morgan, a source confirmed, is the son of Hugh Morgan. The source also related that some years past Kroger had appointed William Morgan to start up and head a new branch of the Liberal Party. A student’s branch at the institution in which young Morgan was temporarily incarcerated, RMIT. It is the rat-hole in which Sinclair Davidson pretends to be a learned Professor of economics. It had a starting membership of one and remained at one. Another Kroger sure fire success. Rumour has it that the appointment of young Morgan as an IPA Director is to make him seem plausible as another Kroger candidate for a Liberal Party seat.
Let’s not forget another nasty former Director, Mike Nahan, who freely smeared genuine Liberals and now holds a seat in the Parliament of W.A. The Kemps, the Morgans, the Krogers, who:
- Killed the Victorian Division stone dead
- Did their bit to destroy the campaign for labour market reform
- Did their best to oust Prime Minister Howard and replace him with their fellow clubman, Peter Costello
- Blew the Liberal Party out of the 2007 election waters because they destroyed the fight for free labour markets.
I say, Mr. Woods, I am only warming up, but it is plain now things are not looking good at all. This item will be resumed on Monday but let’s end this section with an anticipatory conclusion:
Next to their non-existent intellectual grip, what typfies the Right is that they believe they are not required to publicly defend their positions, as well as believing they do not have to attack the Left. People will merely accept what they say is true and obey. A great tactic, which is one of the many reasons they destroyed the fight for free labour markets. A reticence mixed with the brew that runs strong in their veins, cowardice. The same applies to the IPA.
To defend grave causes and hit the diseased Left, requires the weaponry and ammunition of sound theory and scholarly depth in the history of economics and economic history. The Right and their think tanks are complete voids on all three counts.
The battles that are being fought now were begun not last year. They were engaged decades ago and the Right betrayed the Liberal Party, Australians, and finally the Cabinet in these deadly battles. The CIS and IPA never engaged and never did the advanced homework required to fight. Instead, they and the HR Nicholls Society yielded whole swathes of territory on the count of time alone. They compounded the damage with their economic illiteracy that discredited the free market cause. Moreover, their notion of economics served only the Statist Right and prepared the way for Brackistan, Ruddistan, Capital Destruction Day by Carbon Taxes.
The IPA has never defended free markets and never attacked the Left and lousy policies. They have always taken money from shareholders, due to them steering CEOs and Directors and then abandoning them once the moolah is in the bank. They have never applied the money to things that esnure an effective fight and then encouraged guns to use those things. They also have made sure, with it, no sound alternative advice reached Liberal Party.
It goes without saying, therefore, that they have never even attempted to convince firms they need guns who can fight from within a solid framwork of theory. They have wrecked major causes. This is all why this lot supplied oxygen to the likes of the BCA, AIG, Rudd and his gang of thugs, and hard Left Fronts.
What is needed is a campaign, not bloviating speakers, self-serving articles, smart-aleck commentary, etc., but a hard hitting campaign run by dedicated patriots who know how to defend free market principles and who have the guts to go all the way. Instead we get rubbish like Moore, Bolt, Blair, Evans, Morgan, Berg, Humphries, Greg Lindsay, Kroger, Greg Lindsay, CIS and IPA.