Mangled Thoughts

Their motive is not personal, it is professional. This is not new. They have engaged in efforts to damage the reputations of others over many years, Mr. Jackson’s certainly. Their motive for this is summed up in one word, venality. Their concern is to obtain ‘donations’ and those they see as a threat to obtaining ‘donations’ have to be dealt with. By donors, I mean company officers handing over shareholder funds into their hands.

Professional. So let’s consider: Is it verging on deliberate defamation? Let’s relate an anecdote. A city source told me they noticed another senior figure with a copy of Jackson’s The Labour Market Wars. A clown noticed it too, and began to smear Jackson’s work, and steered the gentleman to the material of the HR Nicholls Society - their garbage that blew the fight for free markets and the Liberal Party out of the water.

Jackson has delivered devastating criticisms of ‘papers’ by the CIS, IPA, and HR Nicholls Society. There is good reason. Those papers are not only at best defective. They bear upon matters that have grave force for Australian, and purveyed as sound analysis and, crucially, sound policy positions, which claims give ACTU heavies and the hard Left a good chuckle everyday.

“Carbongate”, and the CIS’ lobby papers pushing carbon taxes amplifies things rather well. It is remarkable that the Rudd Cabinet is using the tissue of falsehoods to push its case. Manufacturing is another instance.

Lousy fiscal policy is hollowing out manufacturing in Australia. This is compounding the devastation wrought over decades by Australia’s hideous tax regime (regulation is a tax too). AIG’s data over a year is confirming this. Jackson has repeatedly applied Austrian theory to explain and warn over a few decades. What do we get from the Right? Papers such as the Professor Sinclair Davidson-Berg rubbish on manufacturing calling for ‘industry policy” and carbon taxation (it is one of the IPA’s classics and a monument to stupidity).

The Right have not rebutted Jackson. What they do, repeatedly, is smear him, never to his face, but running around the Internet to smear him. ESS has supplied another of infinite instances of this in comments. He links to Greg Lindsay’s pet, John Humphreys, a whining, feeble, gutless monkey, who is fronting Lindsay’s lobby campaign for interests seeking to enrich themselves through carbon taxation.

The smears are for “professional” reasons. Now the IPAhas decided to smear Dr. Frank Shostak, former Professor in economics and, importantly: Now works in the private sector. This is, to repeat, what the IPA’s effort is about.

The effort to impugn Dr. Shostak has not backfired. It has blown up in their faces. Well, they produce suicide bombs and someone will oblige by detonating them using a rocket launcher. So enters another IPA cane-toad to the rescue, calling himself “resumechecker”, with a stunning comment:

So this Dr Shostak, a professor you say? Professor where? A man with a
PHD from Rand Afrikaans University would be struggling to be a professor
anywhere

Even children in Queensland splatter cane-toads with golf clubs.

Deceitful of him. Rand is no obscure University. It is is the core of what is now called University of Johannesburg. Even if, though, it were obscure? So what?! What has it do do with Dr. Shostak’s work and the calibre of it?

Can the IPA say how many universities there are in the world? I can. There are about 30,000. Can the IPA name off the cuff the top 50 universities. It might come as a surprise to readers how many of the top 50 few have, to follow the IPA, not been ‘heard of’, and this is before trying the same for a list of 300 and then, say, a thousand and so on.

So, there it is, another asinine, infantile comment by the juvenile, ‘ga ga’ company of the the IPA with the obvious force of an attempt to smear Dr. Shostak’s reputation as their usual direct ad hominem smear. 

Consider, readers, scholars you know of, the most distinguished scholars. Can you name their universities? How many of them belong to well known universities?  I can name some very distinguished scholars in their fields, known around the world, but their universities are not known around the world. Yet, these narcissistic, professional dole bludging bastards at the IPAseek to impugn Dr. Shostak’s reputation by such a snide reflection that only inbred, intellectually challenged, ignorant, venal brats could manage.

Worse, Dr. Shostak has never mentioned the IPA. He has not written anything about their puny efforts. Nothing at all, and yet those lying bastards come out and smear Shostak.

That in itself, that Shostak has not referred to them in anyway, makes crystal clear that their smears of others is not personal, it is professional. Readers, this is exactly the point I have been making on the the Right’s sustained smearing of Jackson, to damage his reputation in economics where it counts for those craven cowards, in the eyes of ‘donors’ and potential ‘donors’.

These yellow pygmies don’t have the guts to challenge Jackson and now Dr. Shostak directly. In contrast, that lot:

Refuse to defend what they claim. They believe they do not have to defend what they claim. They believe they are not only entitled to make claims unchallenged but others must accept them without question and worse:

They expect what they merely assert to be implemented by Cabinets and obeyed by companies. Debate? These bastards brook not even a hint of it! Instead, they smear two gentlemen behind their backs, and then pour out their bile over the Internet against any others who exposes gaping holes in the rotting hull they float as the height of economic reasoning.

What a contrast, these brave heroes, the Right. They are afraid of the Left. When a hard Leftist says boo, they scream, “Don’t hurt us”. Professor Quiggin certainly has great fun bouncing the bums. Instead, these vicious housewives run around smearing genuine Liberals and in the case of Jackson and Shostak, two very fine free market economists to blacken their professional reputations.

Having mentioned this week that I pay these two gentlemen the same regard and respect as I do professors in other sound fields of learning, I meant it. Having debated, discussed, and also engaged in private discussions with also some distinguished professors from very famous Universities, the two gentlemen rightly stand in good company. Their work shows they are formidable and there it is readers:

The ignorant, incompetent, feeble, ignorant Right, who refuse to defend anything they claim, resort to the only ‘debating’ method they do command, smearing others. But as I said, it is not personal on their part, it is ‘professional’. They continually apply themselves to damaging the reputation of others for on aim only:

To make themselves look good before the only types they consider worthy of respect, those who have the authority to hand over shareholders funds to them. What is meant by respect in this regard is buttering up and grovelling before those who hold the keys to loot.

The IPA has extended it’s efforts to include Dr. Shostak. It is clear why they have. Shostak is in the private sector.

The Right and their clunker tanks are, at last, being recognised for what they are. This is why donors have stopped being donors to them and why others, very irritated, are considering why they bother propping up a bunch of bludging, developmentally arrested, delinquent, juvenile, whining, venal, narcissistic bastards whose great achievements are:

- Betraying firms

- Supporting lousy policies that strangle companies to death, with the consequences many Australians are made poorer or, thrown into unemployment outright and face the appalling prospect of destitution.

- Discrediting free markets and free market economics.

- Destroying the Liberal Party.

- Supporting new, destructive policies and the big one is carbon taxes that will raze Australians into the ground.

This is in addition to what they did in Victoria; what they did to Victorians. What they did in Victoria was driven by their in fact anti-free market, not debated lousy economics. Victorians are wearing the consequences, and the shocking, criminal treatment of rather many Victorians through the STO and OPA draws out with great clarity what a callous, stupid pack of bastards the Right truly is.

Now the Right also supports the totalitarian, capital obliterating criminal action of carbon taxation and one of the funniest excuses one of them, Professor Sinclair “Sunk like led” Davidson (who also smears Jackson in back alleys infested with brats), is:

He supports it because then he can impose a ‘flat tax’.

The Right is possessed of another fine virtue, the Fuhrer principle runs thick in their veins and not blood.

I will be emailing this item to my City contacts, to ensure they read it to ensure they fully appreciate what an appalling pack of gutless, feeble, bastards the Right truly is.

It is apt that that thug, Michael Kroger, is a Director of the IPA. Reprising the antics of the KKR might be a good idea. It is something the Right is not keen on the public being reminded of:

How the Right strangled the Liberal Party

Smeared and threatened genuine Liberals

Strong-armed branches

Re-wrote the Constitution to consolidate total control over it

Stuffed 104 Exhibition Street with their monkeys

Stacked Parliamentary seats with their clones as candidates.

It’s a long list of their nice habits. Reduced the Victorian Liberal Party to the laughing stock it is today. But it is no longer the Liberal Party. It is the Right-wing Clique Party.

Liberal members and donors have, as a consequence, left it in droves. Except, perhaps, for a few hardy, persisting but unhappy Liberals, the membership today is no more than the Right-wing clique. The numbers tell it; diced from an active 30,000 to a bare 1,000.

The matter in the KKR items might be the past but the Right remain the same.

So, that lot have the hide to whine about ‘betrayal’ on this site. I’m not betraying anything. I’m defending the Liberal cause, and it is about principles and this means I am coming at those bastards from the front with fists wrapped in knuckle dusters each day.

The Right smears Mr. Jackson and Dr. Frank Shostak, to damage these two professionally. It is telling the IPA continues to smear them on this site. Some of their pet narcissistic bastards are on the loose and:

That lot of professional, wealthy dole bludging parasites sit on their flabby backsides in their bolted clubrooms believing it would not blow up in their faces. They never learn. These geniuses are so bright they could not even spot a train about to roll over them. And they have sat in their bunker as their ’gofers’ blabber smears.

Well, the IPA, the CIS, and the HR Nicholls Society owe Mr Jackson an unreserved apology, stating that that is what they have done, acted to impugn Mr. Jackson professionally. A public statement of this fact, and also directly stated to all ‘donors’ before whom they have smeared Mr. Jackson.

They now also owe the same unreserved apologies, with the explanation that it is about impugning Dr. Shostak, to the public and ‘donors’. That they have impugned a man who has never examined their ‘work’ at all, never said a word about them at all.

Bye the bye, Dr. Frank Shostak challenged hard Leftist Kenneth Galbraith in public. Galbraith ran away. In contrast, the Right hide from hard Leftists. While the IPA and CIS wet their pants each time Professor Quiggin says boo, Shostak sought a vigorous exchange with Galbraith and Galbraith ran away. In the mean-time:

ACTU heavies and the economics guns they hire fear Jackson, while Quiggin is a bit of target practice for Jackson. Here’s Jackson eviscerating Quiggin, the hard Leftist the Right are scared witless of, once again: Austrian business cycle theory defended.

I challenged ESS and the IPA to a meeting at the Sherlock Holmes, to eliminate all possible excuses they can find to insinuate that I am Jackson. I repeat the offer but with a difference, they buy the beer but there’s $1,000 on the table:

And there will be an open debate with witnesses, including company executives and any other serious figures who would find it very beneficial to witness it. Anyone who is in contact with Mr. Jackson, please show him this proposal.

There will be an open proper debate on crucial matters. The audience is free to challenge any speaker.

It would be good to see Sharon Burrows turn up, and some ACTU heavies. But she wouldn’t because she knows that after 30 seconds of facing up to Jackson, she’ll be leaving inside a couple of hundred plastic shopping bags.

I mention Burrows because I heard this half-wit on the Hinch show and saw her on TV yesterday. Hinch didn’t know what to hit her with, but then the Right don’t know either, but I know. Who was put up to lay out the case for firms? A PR man. This is a hard economic fight, it needs economics and, thanks to the Right, it’s now a mere PR job.

What did the PR man have to say? Firms have to tough it out themselves. Well, yes, because that is what they have been doing for decades and all due to the gutless, ignorant, venal, unprincipled Right. Then there are all those who will be given a 100% pay cut because the Unions are now free to exact effective minimum wages.

It was damned annoying listening to that ga ga half-wit, Burrows, spout a litany of bilge the Right conceded entirely. No wonder Australian TV and radio are prisons built by the IQ challenged. They exist to protect thugs Left and Right, and reinforced with propaganda sheets euphemistically called newspapers. No-one with muscle can break into the hovels to tear inmates apart, particularly for prime-time viewing.

Yes, that is the offer. A no-holds barred, honest debate, and so no rocks for the Right to hide under and feeling safe, secure, and comfy, stick their tongues out, blow bubbles, and smear their superiors. Next:

There will be advertising fliers sent out all around the City with time, date and venue stamped on them. And it will be an open invitation to the public. 

It will, to suspect, require a venue slightly more spacious than the Sherlock Holmes.

Yes, a good, honest debate and I’ll look forward to it, as should other parties. The cleaners will be months cleaning their guts and blood off the carpets by the time Jackson, and any other gun willing to engage, has finished with that lot of lobotomised baboons.