Mangled Thoughts

What do China and Australia have in common?

Ordinary Liberal Party members are appalled at the obvious and what has their back up is, it didn’t happen overnight, nor in the last two years. What chills them all the more is that they know full well that the Right is as much responsible for it as the Left. It is the culmination of years of ‘policies’. Yet, it is not Liberal Party members only who are drawing the conclusion. It increasingly litters the daily conversation of the man in the street.

The answer, ladies and gentlemen, as brutal as it might seem, is fascism. For good measure, amusingly Victoria is almost what China also is, a one Party State, and the Victorian Right, whether ‘wets’ or ‘dries’ - the distinction is a mere quibble turning on their hubris, is also responsible for this. Apart from Victoria, the general question is, where is Australia’s Right in all this, fascism, and it’s rhetorical only.  Let’s lay the case out per a swift demonstration:

The case of Peter Spencer

New South Wales farmer, Peter Spencer, is fighting for his property rights. What this turns on is, all property owners in Australia own their property in name only, but pay for the expense of their upkeep. It is politicians and bureaucrats and the voting blocks they buy with the fraud and deception who realise what is crucial to inalienable property rights:

Owner’s

- enjoyment of their property

- use of their property

- development of property, in the case of Peter Spencer’s property, that means land he had developed into valuable agricultural and fishery land

- last, but not least, sale of property.

In sum, freedom of disposal of property is inseparable from inalienable property rights. The one is intrinsic to the other.

Politicians of both major Parties and bureaucrats have seized the former, for their own benefit and for the benefit of the ‘voting blocks’ they toady too. And, the Right crawls and toadies as much as the ALP does to those diseased, lying, Chavez hugging, treacherous, primitive creeps the Greens. I shall repost on Bob Brown’s and the Greens’ and other hard Leftists’ full support for the totalitarian, drug king-pin, Hugo Chavez and his gang of butchers. And the failure of the Right to deal forthrightly with them and what Brown laid out in Parliament.

Inalienable property rights are the foundation of free markets and this means the foundation of prosperity and freedom. It’s the very basis on which people everywhere have lifted themselves and their families out of the gutters, out of misery and into happiness. It is written in history, but we have a direct window into this, the work of Grameen Bank in Bangladesh and it’s founder, Muhammad Yunus.

Having remarked before on the wonderful transformation wrought by this bank, the pertinent point is Yunus’ “micro-credit” didn’t simply finance vast numbers of formerly destitute Bangladeshis into their own start-up enterprises and their expansion. Many, bye the bye, were once effectively bound to old tribal chieftains. It freed them to acquire property and this drives business expansion, and issued into rapid capital accumulation. It liberated them from bondage. This transformed their lives in two ways that are inseparable:

1. The obvious, prosperity, in their own life-time, with-in a single generation. Their children, until Grameem Bank, faced the same life of hard labour, mired in appalling destitution as their parents once endured. It’s reflected in good food on the table they could not have had in the past, nice homes they never could have aspired to before, buying medical services, appliances, schools and universities for their children.

Has anyone heard of mass deaths from tidal waves in the bay in recent years, at least with the frequency that blighted their lives in the past? No, of course not. The reason is straight-forward; they not only own nice, well-built, comfortable homes, they own land in superior locations, that’s why.

2. They are free, they have gained real liberty. Their new inalienable property rights has freed them, and extended their freedoms. I detest those who say wealth ‘doesn’t buy happiness’. It does, just ask all those Bangladeshis who are now very, very happy.

It is important to note that Yunus worked very hard to convince the Government that law must be rooted in economic freedom and, this means inalienable property rights, because it was crucial if the aim of Grameen Bank, to transform not a few but millions of lives, was to succeed. He succeeded with the politicians and the evidence is written in happiness. Bangladesh thrives and what does the rest of the world do? Since Bangladesh is no longer a cot-case, but a vibrant demonstration of the truth of free market economics, it is ignored - as an inconvenient fact.

Grameen Bank is imitated in Eastern Europe with the same tremendous success.

Freedom of disposal of property is intrinsic to inalienable property rights

What the politicians and bureaucrats, in concert with Greens fronts have done is not formally stolen property but have effectively done so by ‘regulation’. Thus they have stolen not only from farmers but also-from every Australian (except, of course, themselves) by asserting that they only and not owners can dispose of property. This is what they have done, the Right and the Left, and their advisers.

In case anyone in a city is unsure of this try, for example, merely cutting down a tree in your backyard and see what happens to you. You are allowed to give effect only to how local councils and states’ governments wish to enjoy your house and land. I am aware of some brave types who have defied local councils and state governments and these examples show the ‘Acts’ are hollow but this is not the point to such ‘Acts’. Those who have rammed them down rely on two facts:

1. Millions of Australians are law-abiding and respect authority.

2. Intimidation and fear. Who wants to face the real police state thuggery Cabinets assert through such Acts, and it’s no joke. The police state powers wielded by States’ and Federal Cabinets are real and extensive. Lawlessness in the form of violent, naked coercion backed by goon squad enforcers are real threats to be wielded against Australians who refuse to comply with what is dictated to them.

Now for Mr. Spencer again, beginning with a joke:

Two farmers in1930’s Germany:

Hans: What’s the difference between National Socialism and Communism, I’m confused.

Carl: Hans, Hans, my friend, it’s simple. Under communism, the State keeps your cows. You milk them and drink all that your scraggy cow produces before they get their hands on it.

Carl: Under fascism, you keep the cow, the State milks it and drinks the milk from the mangy beast.  Hans, Hans… where are you going?

Hans: I’m going to shoot the cow. Under communism, it’s clear now,  a farmer gets to drink all the milk until the day they shoot him. Under fascism, I keep the cow, the gauleiter can throw me in prison if I don’t keep it how they want it kept and hand over specified production. So, I reckon I’ll go to jail for committing what is a crime according to them, killing Heidi. Carl, the bastards will go right round the bend when they find a fly-eaten carcass. It’s alright, though, the joke’s on them: I’ll drink milk in prison.

In not only Mr. Spencer’s case, but of all farmers around Australia, the excuse for what is nothing less than property theft on a tremendous scale has been the cult of environmentalism and expressed in regulation. It must not be forgotten that, for example, Malcolm Fraser also blitzed the way with large-scale land grabs, declaring vast tracts of forests as “heritage wilderness”. The latest twist is just that, another twist committed by the perverted sitting in parliaments, ‘carbon capture’ to excuse the indefensible.

Regulation is not rule of law; it is the overthrow of the rule of common law, which is grounded in inalienable property rights and so free markets. It is no accident that both Right-wing politicians, including Peter Costello, and Leftist politicians assert regulation is the rule of law. They are doing nothing less than attempting to convince the two are identical. Repeating a lie often does not make it true, and it is nice to see the lying bastards in the East Anglia University will be dealt with on the wrong end of trials in courts for this very reason.

A distinguished law lord made it very plain what regulation is and what it is not. Lord Mansfield’s 1772 judgement:

The state of slavery is of such a nature, that it is incapable of being introduced on any reasons, moral or political; but only positive law, which preserves its force long after the reasons, occasion, and time itself from whence it was created, is erased from memory: it’s so odious, that nothing can be suffered to support it, but positive law.

In Victoria, Steve Bracks, John Brumby, Rod Hulls and local councils proceeded from imposing restrictions on land clearance and usage, to outright criminalisation of any activity on property they do not like, eg. clearing highly volatile scrub and trees are major crimes for which the punishment is fines and prison terms. This was not merely unopposed by Victoria’s Right, they supported it in the Parliament. Another instance, Bracks’ ‘Green belt’ through Melbourne and outlying areas.

For many in this ‘green belt’, their property was also their superannuation ‘policy’, from market gardeners, other types of firms, to home owners who had planned to split large blocks later in life to pay for their retirement. Any proposed change in land use must be submitted in a report to the Orwellian ‘Department of Enviornment’ and, if approved, the owner must pay a fee, and, should it be approved, the minimum fee is $50,000 and this for a slight, trivial alteration in usage only.

Under Commonwealth and NWS regulations Right-wing and Leftist politicians effectively stole Mr. Spencer’s and all other farmers’ rights progressively, and progressively forced Mr. Spencer and others to shut down agricultural production on their properties in a matter of a decade or so. Their farms are now, as Mr. Spencer’s is, valueless, worthless. Mr. Spencer, as are others, is left with land reverting to savage jungle and another load of fuel for more ferocious, more life-destroying bush-fires.

Victorian and NSW farmers also watched politicians and bureaucrats further steal property rights for their own expense free pleasure by making it a criminal offence to build water storage capacity on their farms.It is clear what that lot in the name of their cult expect modest Australians to do.

All of the above committed by the Left and the Right and not paying their many victims one cent of compensation. The likes of Mr. Spencer own their properties in name only, and have to pay for the upkeep and the only beneficiaries of this are politicians, bureaucrats and greens and other diseased Leftists.

And to make sure there is no room for doubt on this, three Right-wing minsters are directly guilty of these criminal actions against Australians, Ian Campbell, David Kemp and Malcolm Turnbull as successive Ministers for the Federal Department of Environment. But first, Mr. Spencer supplies a quote  from none other than Pulitzer Prize winning jurist, Peter Costello.

Mr Peter Costello on the ABC 7.30 report on the 6^th of June 2007 said

“Let me come back to the point earlier, that because we stopped land clearing, some how that shouldn’t be counted. Actually, stopping land clearing was a good thing…

“Yeah well, its- that‘s – but this was all designed to stop land clearing and we stopped land clearing, and its helped us meet our Kyoto target.”

The lie, man causes ‘global warming’, and the Kyoto fraud are only recent developments in what is a long record of politicians and bureaucrats using Federal and States’ Parliaments to create the impression their actions are lawful.

Mr. Spencer recorded a damning quote. This what Mr. Ian Campbell, when Minister for the Environment, said:

Campbell:

…you’ve got, you know, a lot of the natural heritage of Australia is held on private lands, on farms and pastoral leases, stations as we call them, and so the main people who look after this natural heritage are in fact the farmers… so very important that they’re on board and don’t feel like some heavy-handed Government based in Perth is trampling on their property rights.

Bingo! And, that expression, ‘don’t feel like…’  Here’s a quick and honest solution - dope farmers and their families, or shoot them outright. Either way, they won’t ‘feel’ a thing again.

That’s what private property means to the Right and the Left. Sodding little bastards called Australians expecting to prosper and enjoy real freedom are a blight on the landscape (as are factories). The serfs should be grateful to be allowed the privilege of stumping up tremendous sums to buy property and ensure their masters enjoy these pleasure parks. This is the great advance made by parasites such as Campbell, Kemp, Turnbull, Garrett, Brown, Penny Wong, Tony Abbott, Greg Hunt, Helen Kroger, Peter Costello and Kevin Rudd.

Though, at least Campbell had the decency to say:

So you’ve got to have the farmers working with you and that’s the Commonwealth’s approach, is there should be fair compensation paid when you take away peoples’ property rights…(My stress).

Yes, readers, Campbell and Cabinet fully knew what they were committing, and so did Peter Costello and they still know what they did to Australians.

Moreover, they were using coercion to cut food production through the ethanol scam, and this while they were also effectively confiscating vast tracts of land and shutting, coercing the shutdown of more food production.

These treacherous slobs had the nerve to attack the Rudd Cabinet for using taxpayers to buy a property to shut it down (it’s in Hansard). It is criminal the deliberate economic arson of a property but in this case the owners were paid, except every other little oaf risibly called an Australian had to pay for this one more green, destructive fantasy. They, the Right had the hide to whine about it when they are responsible for much that is far worse, commencing with measures that has ended in Mr. Spencer taking his stand. The right should never use the word proportion again, nor level ‘hypocrite’ against anyone.

The fact is, despite Ian Campbell’s, and Peter Costello’s best efforts to exculpate themselves and pass it off as ’sound policy’, there is no compensation for the real theft of property rights and, what is more, the fascist measures by which they effected it. But we don’t have to refer to the regimes of Hitler and Mussolini to illuminate this. China today provides chilling examples of what it means -  a living window into the force of the actions of the Right and the Left:

What Australia and China have in common

No ifs or buts, the situation is the same:

1) There are no inalienable property rights in China.

2) The fascist pin of these despicable actions is one and the same in both countries.

Both the Right and the Left together, over decades have been engaged in overthrowing inaliebale property rights in Australia. The Red Party gerontocracy must have a good, long laugh at the clowns in Canberra, daily. A very nasty, continuing case demonstrates the point rather well, and there is a further irony in it, what is happening is compounded and driven by the Green’s policies of Western politicians.

Rare earths have a wide range of uses. Keith Bradsher in, Earth-Friendly Elements, Mined Destructively (25/12/09, The New York Times) relates the alternative energy scams set up by western politicians has entailed an explosivel increase in demand for them that has, naturally, induced sky-rocketing prices. It might be mused, therefore, Australia’s politicians are also directly responsible for the economic impact this has for their use as inputs in genuine market driven production. The regime compounded this with export quotas, which it cut by 12%.

These elements come almost entirely from China, from some of the most environmentally damaging mines in the country, in an industry dominated by criminal gangs…

Miners scrape off the topsoil and shovel golden-flecked clay into dirt pits, using acids to extract the rare earths. The acids ultimately wash into streams and rivers, destroying rice paddies and fish farms and tainting water supplies.

On a recent rainy afternoon, Zeng Guohui, a 41-year-old laborer, walked to an abandoned mine where he used to shovel ore, and pointed out still-barren expanses of dirt and mud. The mine exhausted the local deposit of heavy rare earths in three years, but a decade after the mine closed, no one has tried to revive the downstream rice fields.

Small mines producing heavy rare earths like dysprosium and terbium still operate on nearby hills…

“There are constant protests because it damages the farmland — people are always demanding compensation,” Mr. Zeng said.

Green fraud aside, the kernel of the problem described, the destruction of agriculture and crude, destructive mining techniques, is that there are no property rights in China. Neither farmers nor sound mining companies have them, nor does anyone else in China. So, neither farmers nor mining companies have a basis for fighting the crime gangs destroying property by asserting inalienable property rights. Crime gangs aside, consider it:

With inalienable property rights, anyone can enforce their rights, should a neighbour use their property in such a way as to cause damage on the other’s property. A Judge, in his conclusions, will order the culprit to make good the damage they caused to the other and cease actions causing damage. Take, for example, Victoria and the firestorms of February this year, and those still waiting to be triggered.

All the firestorms were in government ‘owned’ forests. They don’t work them, they don’t clear them, they do nothing. If anyone else kept such large swathes of land like that, neighbours could sue, certainly when firestorms erupt and also press criminal charges, including murder. This is apart from also the proliferation of feral animals in those pleasure parks, including feral dogs that destroy farmers’ capital -  live-stock.

So, why are politicians and bureaucrats exempt from at least criminal charges when it is their ‘policies’ that caused the firestorms and destroyed tremendous amounts of property and murdered so many Victorians? Make no mistake, the actions of all guilty of this horror were deliberate. They imposed the’policies’, the Right and the Left. They did this to Victorians.

There is, in truth, no good reason why the whole damned lot of them should not be rammed before stiff in common law judges and tried on every criminal charge and on top of prison terms, have their properties seized and handed over to their many victims. No, seriously, readers, this is what should be done! It’s not a joke; they are rotten criminals who killed Victorians, no-one else did what they did.

Since sound mining companies do not have property rights in China, they cannot establish them in new prospective mines. Since farmers have no inalienable property rights, they cannot work with sound mining companies, and profit as a result while maintaining their farmland. The field is clear for the crime gangs, encouraged by soaring prices and the stupidity and brutality of politicians in China and in the West.

Near destitute farmers are now more than merely worse off. Brutalised and facing a very bleak future is the politest way to sum up their position. All due to the fascist, anti-inalienable property rights position of the regime. On the other hand, inalienable property rights would spell the end of that terrifying regime. Two other incidents reinforce the point;

1. In preparing for that fascist exercise in squander and nationalistic hubris, the Olympic Games, the regime simply closed down factories in Peking, fiat. Never mind the investors and employees. To sanitise Peking, to make Peking look Greenie friendly to the spivs in Europe and on the Olympics ‘committee’.

2. The recent jail term handed down to a former Communist party official for daring to consider how to end the one Party state.

It was as good as loading those unfortunates into a skip and throwing them on a garbage dump as so much rubbish. This drew praise from theOlympic Games spivs - what a ‘wonderful effort by the regime in cleaning up Peking, helping to make it a cleaner, greener, future’.

Orwell got in first, pigs spew vomit and expect the slaves to lap it up. And it was vile. Modest Chinese, whose priority is to do the best they can for themselves and their families, taxed to pay for a two weeks orgy, were rendered destitute so that parasites could feel happy and developmentally arrested juveniles could sweat and grunt in 2 weeks of exhibitionism, to win piffling baubles and, in the case of many - crossing their fingers, be made wealthy ‘career sportsmen and women’.

Well, well, surprise, surprise! What do we see but the Right and the Left have been doing exactly the same to Australians, and not in the last few years. They have been at it over decades and Mr. Spencer has drawn attention to this fact.

And there’s a sign of fascism, the cult of ‘National Sport’,

Local councillors and States’ and Federal governments seizing private property by the $billions and throwing it at ‘elite sports’. Rubbing salt into injury, they call it investment and have spawned a new army of parasites who expect sodding real taxpayers to keep them in the ‘lifestyles’ they expect as of right. You know, those sodding little elves sweating away in factories, mines, and farms to earn a living, only to see their earnings swiped off them by lying, juvenile bastards pretending to be adults. Stalin would also approve, he was a keen ‘patron’ of ‘elite sport’ in, of course, the ‘national interest’.

The message a genuine Liberal Party would give them is: “You want to star, or run a sport. Do it in your own bloody backyard, you big fat tosser.’

Peter Costello avowed fascist aims in a candid radio interview

During an interview on Melbourne radio station 3AW, Neil Mitchell asked Peter Costello:

“But, taxpayers’ money; it’s their property, right?”

Costello was about to firmly answer yes, then checked himself:

“In a way it is…”

That answer is the genuine Costello. The force of his answer is plain enough, what politicians and their enforcer the ATO do not take is, they assert, a grant made by them to sodding Australians.

The sheer amount of police state ‘laws’ that Costello alone is responsible for, through the ATO, is an indictment of the world’s greatest economist. I tracked some of them that filled volumes each, and yet they were but a tiny fraction of what Costello rammed down on Australians. My mistake, he didn’t push them through Parliament; this would credit him with what he is devoid of, energy and intelligence.

He rubber stamped them. He agreed ‘in principle’. There was nothing more to do except bang his head down into an inked stamp pad and affix his signature authorising the establishment of another goon squad, then stand up in Parliament and assert, to the unexpressed pleasure of the diseased Left, it is good ‘LAW’. No doubt every damned treacherous Leftist celebrated hard each new gift Costello, the boy wonder, handed them. I wonder who the moron was who passed him - forget University, out of prep school - because that criminal should be shot.

A reader attempted a cheap put down when some years ago one pointed out that taxpayers under the regulations are treated as criminals, guilty of what are novel crimes, and have to prove themselves innocent 365 days a year. All one will say to that clever dick is, try telling that to all those who know what the real force of the ‘tax code’ is and, as I remarked earlier this year, Rudd and Swann intensified them again to ensure many more Australians know where they really stand.

Yes, Peter Costello, as Treasurer, intensified and extended violent, naked coercion, backed by goon squad enforcers, as real, intimidatory threats to be wielded against Australians who refuse to comply with what is dictated to them. Peter Costello has the hide to consider himself a fine, up-standing Liberal and Australian, and so do the rest of the mendacious Right. I’m here to remind the Right, their guru is a true and fitting representative of them all in all their qualities.

Indeed, Costello, with his hunch back-attachment, Michael Kroger, is the Right personified. No wonder his brother, Tim, is Jesus Karl Marx Christ. They are exact mirrors to each other. Yes, Costello is the Right perfected and magnified. I’m here to remind Costello of what he really was as Treasurer, a fascist thug.

Through regulation, politicians and bureaucrats have succeeded in re-arranging their position. They are much too, too important to be mere public servants, with taxpayers as their masters. No, they are the masters of Australians and the latter are slaves, the proper order of things. It’s understandable that the Swiss are despised in Australia too.

Regulation is rooted in the myth of perfect competition, and it is at once also a direct attack on inalienable property rights, for this is exactly what is also involved in ‘anti-cartel laws’, which Costello proudly intensified. The Right are committed to the myth and in this, have done splendidly in discrediting the sound, therefore highly moral free market cause in the eyes of many voters. The truth of free market economics is an inconvenient fact that must be eradicated according to that lot, another thing they hold in common with the treacherous Left. It is why the Right’s single line of attack is to claim they are better ‘economic mangers’ and berate the left for incompetence.

Watching them and their think tanks, IPA, CIS and HR Nicholls Society, smear and slander genuine free market economists while they rammed down anti-free market policies under Liberal States’ and Federal Cabinets is a real insight into what perverted, vicious bastards the Right truly is. All this before considering, for example, what they did with the STO in Victoria during the Kennett years, and the IPA and CIS are really nervous about what I have reported to date on it. They are not looking forward to what I will further disclose, as numbers of their inmates have made plain on this site in comments. The IPA and the CIS were the Kennett-Stockdale Cabinet’s economic advisers.

But, the Right and the Left have promoted the cult of environmentalism, because, as the Spencer case demonstrates, they have latched on to it as an excuse to effect fascist plans overtly and rapidly.

The case of Mr. Spencer summed up

Mr. Spencer is fighting for his inalienable property rights, and for compensation for the economic carnage the Right and the Left, and bureaucrats, police state thugs more like, have caused him and his family. Mr. Spencer’s fight is now a general fight, as all landowners now realise that this is what is at stake, and that they are also entitled to just compensation for the damage that has been inflcited on them. It is to be noted, those who are in increasing large numbers joining Mr. Spencer, realise the crimes have not been committerd by ALP Cabinets only. They have correctly identified the Right as also culpable of these lawless actions.

The hard Left dissemble they reflect the values of those who stood at Eureka Stockade. Bullshit they do. It is guys such as Mr. Spencer who do. Indeed, how long before we do see outright, wide defiance of the tax regimes of local councils, States’ Governments and the Federal Goverment? Carbon taxation has crystallised a few hard truths for very many Australians, all those little voters the Right as well as the hard Left despise.

One important force of Common Law is to protect Australians’ property rights against Cabinets straying down the ‘regulatory’ path. It is no wonder that the Right and the Left, bureaucrats, and sundry ‘academics’ in law, run the spin in the media that regulation is the rule of common law. They have every motive to try to brainwash Australians into believing that lawlessness and thuggery committed by political parties in Parliament and by bureaucrats is decent and, importantly, lawful. Why, the Nazi Party and its squads, the Gestapo were scrupulous to a fault, were meticulous in ensuring all that they did was legal too.They were ‘morally superior’ to the Communist regime in this respect.

No one can question the veracity of both Right-wing and Leftist Cabinets in this respect- Federal, States’, Local Councils, in ensuring that all their actions are legal and why not. They only wrote the bloody rules - as did the Nazi regime. Indeed, much time in Senate ‘debate’ on bills is prudence manifested. They are all concerned to ensure the legality of all articles, clauses and sub-sections of any Bill they ram down.

Their concern is understandable, reflected in a curious pre-occupation. They are all concerned to discover how easily a measure might be challenged in common law and, consequently, whether they could be had up on criminal charges. It’s not a joke, readers. Their lines of ‘questions’ and ‘answers’ are dominated by these two telling questions. Moreover, amendments are introduced when it is found their backsides are fully exposed.

Oh, yes, Left, Right, Upside Down, and Inside out, it doesn’t matter what Party. They are all concerned to ensure they won’t have their heads rammed down a sewer for one reason: they bloody do well know that most of their ‘Acts’ are unlawful. They do know full well what they have perpetrated against Australians, and continue to perpetrate. It’s in Hansard, in black and white.

That they know their actions are not lawful is disclosed in such telling quotes as those included above by Campbell and Costello, and also, ALP heavies in attacking Senator Barnaby Joyce, who for once has got something right:

Barnaby Joyce attacked over land-use claim (18/12/2009, The Australian).

Franklin has got it wrong, in his opening remark -

The government yesterday savaged the opposition finance spokesman as unfit for office after he backed the case of a hunger striker demanding $100 billion in taxpayer compensation for farmers for lost land-clearing rights.

The elimination of freedom to maintain and work land, which is what ‘land clearance is’, nothing more, is rooted in what has been done, the aim of the Right and the Left to seize property rights for their own benefit, and make property owners pay for it. The slimey response of Rudd’s “Finance Minister” was diversion:

The government yesterday savaged the opposition finance spokesman as unfit for office after he backed the case of a hunger striker demanding $100 billion in taxpayer compensation for farmers for lost land-clearing rights.

Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner also demanded the opposition explain how scrapping land-use laws would affect Tony Abbott’s promise to address climate change through direct action on land use.

The Opposition Leader “must come out today and confirm if this is opposition policy or just another erratic thought bubble”, Mr Tanner said.

This, from a Minster of a Cabinet that has plundered thousands of billions of dollars to indulge in a grotesque spending spree. Tanner continued:

“Mr Abbott and Senator Joyce must explain the cost impact their new compensation policy will have on their direct action climate change policy and exactly how they are going to use taxpayer funds to pay for it.”

Those who are victims are entitled to compensation full stop.

Cut to the chase, Mr. Tanner, it is the force of what compensation rests on that disturbs the Left and many in the Right. To ram this home, before taxpayers are touched for one cent of compensation, all those responsible for these fascist, lawless schemes, and all  those who are beneficiaries must be ordered to pay part of the compensation out of their own assests first, then taxpayers making up the difference.

There is a problem, the sheer scale involved, and I don’t mean the numbers required to compensate only farmers. What about every Australian who suffers the same problem. It is the exposure, in law, of the deception and criminal action of parasites in Local Councils, States’ Governments, and the Federal Governments, and their predecessors that scares these lying bastards shitless.

What Mr. Barnaby Joyce needs to do, but stubbornly refuses to, is turn to sound free market economics and seek those who can advise him. This is where Joyce falls down. It is not simply property rights that have to be fought for. It is the fact that property rights is the pin of free markets and so freedom, and the anti-inalienable property rights ‘policies’ of both Parties are fascist that demands solid, robust preparation. It requires sound free market economics to fight this and where it counts, out in the open and on the only battle ground that counts, with the modest voter.

Here is Kevin Rudd’s Green Cult guru and also a Pultizer jurist and yes, as Costello, another spoilt brat whose degree is law:

Environment Minister Peter Garrett also weighed in, saying land-use controls had existed for many years and had been put in place by state governments. He said: “The question for Mr Abbott is: does he support Senator Joyce’s new policy initiative?”

Garrett’s reasoning is thus: If Cabinets get away with lawlessness for a number of years, then it is lawful.

But, the legalese eagle is making a fine point, the right sort of criminal lawlessness committed by Cabinets and enforced by police state goon squads, as defined by, well, them. Now, if the Right were in Office, it would be lawful; what would be wrong are mere adminstrative details. This is what the garbage by that retarded, developmentally arrested, wealthy, ignorant, dummy sucking brat amounts to. And, he’s right, for that is the “Right’s” notion of ‘principled opposition’.

But there it is, Tanner himself has confessed the fascist force of this effective coup de tat against Australians - Australians own property in name only. They must keep them as ordered by their masters in Local Councils, States’ Parliaments and Federal Parliament. They must also pay any extra levies these parasites demand for the privilege of being allowed to keep their land. In return, accept destitution and, the truth of the matter, accept what is all too bluntly evident- the now fast slide into absolutism. And, this is what Rudd’s grand plan to ram down carbon taxes, and ‘remake the Australian economy’ will complete if passed, and so would Abbott’s version. This is central planning with naked totalitarian force.  Stalin and Mao tried and look what happened. The response of the Right? Exactly.

Oh, but for two things:

- They paved the way for the horror times ahead. Now we end up with Tony Abbott who only called for central planning to be rammed down in his manifesto. The funny thing is, this is what the Rudd Cabinet is doing.

Oh, I see, Abbott’s objection is that it’s Rudd and not him who get’s the glory and praise for this wheeze. I understand, sympathise with the poor old boxing boof-head, he had to knife Turnbull, who also wanted to do the same thing to Australians and it’s Rudd who will win the great mad mullah prize. Oh, by the way, the one time hero of the Liberal Party, John Elliott, sees nothing really wrong in all this - his disagreement is, it should be Turnbull and not Abbott leading the Liberal Party and Australians down the Shining Path to death. He’s as brilliant as Michael Kroger.

- The slide is unmistakable. It is a slide from Statism, to fascism, to outright totalitarianism. The right are directly responsible for this as much as the Left. And, so too are the IPA and CIS, and the clowns in the HR Nicholls Society in which that anti-Liberal half-wit, Peter Costello, is the star ‘economist’. The really hilarious thing in what is otherwise a chilling fact is, the Right don’t have a clue that they are directly culpable. The hard, treacherous Left, however, know they are, which is why they laugh at the Right, and call them clowns and buffoons.

Make no mistake, readers, what is now at stake is not only prosperity for millions of modest Australians. Now freedom is at stake. It’s taken decades to reach this pass, and all Australians can thank the navel-gazing, ignorant, anti-intellectual Right and their selfish, arrogant ‘think tankers’ the CIS, IPA, HR Nicholls Society.

It is silly to pretend millions of modest Australians support hard Left policies and aims. They hate the hard left and their aims. The Right has betrayed them to the treacherous Left and this is the hard, unvarnished truth of the matter.

If there had been genuine Liberal talent in the Liberal Party, backed by solid, gutsy genuine free market economists, the Left would have been smashed decades ago. The Greens, a spastic ugly little mongrel of a puppy-dog, would have been killed at birth. The threat of absolutism would not have emerged. And, bonus! Millions of modest Australians would also be far wealtheir than they are, for there would have been no policies that have hampered and crippled and wiped out investment in Australia, from regulation to the larcenous ‘monetary policies’ of the RBA.

No, instead, the great achievement of the Right and their think tanks is their success in bringing about a fascist regime.

Mr. Spencer and the many who have joined him are fighting for their inalienable property rights, and for compensation for the economic carnage the Right and the Left, and bureaucrats, police state thugs more like, have caused him and his family. What they might not realise is, they are the meat in the sandwich.

The fact that their plight is due to fascist policies points this up. Fighting through the courts alone, Mr. Spencer has realised, won’t work. But, the fight is against a hard Left ideology and neither Mr. Spencer nor his allies are intellectually equipped for this fight. Unless this, in fact, ‘war’ is fought accurately and hard, the reason for Mr. Spencer’s plight won’t be rectified, and all Australians, not only farmers, remain in great danger.

Open Challenge to Senator Barnaby Joyce

Yes, Mr. Barnaby Joyce, you ignore (genuine free market) economic laws at great peril. The perils are being realised. So, Mr. Barnaby Joyce, why do you stubbornly persist in refusing to hear out alternative sources who can lay out vital truths - not for your pleasure and whim, but so that you can do the job you claim to be doing, serving Australians the only way an MP can, from sound principle, reinforced with spine?

Like it or not, Mr. Joyce, without sound advice, you can cause great damage to this cause unless you seek out sources equipped with what you are bereft in, and worse, you are also blind to why this is so crucial. You will fail not only Mr. Spencer. You will fail all Australians in a matter that is grave and of great impact, inalienable property rights. As it is, Mr. Joyce, your stance on the ACCC, and your refusal to work through why ‘anti-cartel laws’ are in fact highly destructive and ruinous for Australians also undercuts much ground you need to hold if you are to succeed in this fight, every other fight, and the war that must be won.

The ‘Dead Right’

The Right has not merely betrayed them, Spencer and all farmers, and all decent Australians. They have sold them all out to the hard Left. The Right has never fought the Left, but then to do this requires what the Right are devoid of, sound principles and the spine to act on them and standing by those principles when they were in office. No, instead, the Right imposed on the Liberal Party venal fifth rate hacks who see nothing wrong with Statist and fascist ‘policies’. Decades of the Dead Right has lead to Rudd.

The Right does not give a stuff about Australians and Australia. They only fight for themselves, for ego inflating media publicity, and for their bank accounts. Gentle readers, I advise you not to get between the likes of Ray Evans, Des Moore, and the inmates of the IPA and a media camera.

So, they threw up the likes of Michael Kroger, Peter Costello, David Kemp. The other reason is, the Right are anti-intellectual, and it shows in the tripe put out by their ‘think tanks’ the IPA, CIS and HR Nicholls Society. These cretins, Kroger, Costello, and David Kemp, are what the Right call talent.

Slobs, who see nothing wrong with policies that ruin firms and Australians, and nothing wrong with ‘circumventing’ inalienable property rights. Come to it, I’ve never once heard nor seen Costello fight against Greens’ policies that destroy production and immiserate many. To the contrary, as Treasurer he sacked Australians to set up more Green frauds such as the ethanol scam. But then, why shouldn’t he have enjoyed loose living when he regards property, including pay packets and firms’ earnings and capital, as the private property of politicians.

Peter Costello is opposed to genuine Liberal principles

No better evidence exists than his actions as Treasurer.

Peter Costello, Hero of the Liberal Party - what a bloody nasty lie that is, but then the Right believe smelly, modest Australians really do love them. Why, when a Toorak Doctor’s Greenie-hugging wife smiles the whole world smiles with her and, heck, the likes of Hugh Morgan, who puckered up for the camera that loved him, know they have the same impact.

Fascism

We can do no better than quote von Mises, Planned Chaos, who in that singular polemical tract smashed the hard Left.

“Fascism was not, as its advocates boasted, an original product of the Italian mind. It began with a split in the ranks of Marxian socialism… Its economic program was borrowed from German non-Marxian socialism and its aggressiveness was likewise copied from Germans, the Alldeutsche or Pan-German forerunners of the Nazis. Its conduct of government affairs was a replica of Lenin’s dictatorship. Corporativism, its much advertised ideological adornment, was of British origin. The only home-grown ingredient of Fascism was the theatrical style of its processions, shows and festivals.”

Corporativo is being advanced by the Rudd Cabinet, through extensive plans and it is not only Co2 taxes that they are preparing to ram down.

Zwangswirtschaft

(Nazi economic policy, 1930’s.)

“…seemingly and nominally, maintains private ownership of the means of production, entrepreneurship, and market exchange. So-called entrepreneurs do the buying and selling, pay the workers, contract debts and pay interest and amortization. But they are no longer entrepreneurs. In Nazi Germany they were called shop managers or Betriebsführer. The government tells these seeming entrepreneurs what and how to produce, at what prices and from whom to buy, at what prices and to whom to sell. The government decrees at what wages laborers should work, and to whom and under what terms the capitalists should entrust their funds. Market exchange is but a sham. As all prices, wages and interest rates are fixed by the authority, they are prices, wages and interest rates in appearance only; in fact they are merely quantitative terms in the authoritarian orders determining each citizen’s income, consumption and standard of living. The authority, not the consumers, directs production. The central board of production management is supreme; all citizens are nothing else but civil servants. This is socialism with the outward appearance of capitalism. Some labels of the capitalistic market economy are retained, but they signify here something entirely different from what they mean in the market economy….

“The Nazi plan was more comprehensive and… pernicious than that of the Marxians. It aimed at abolishing laissez-faire not only in the production of material goods, but no less in the production of men. The Führer was not only the general manager of all industries; he was also the general manager of the breeding-farm intent upon rearing superior men and eliminating inferior stock. A grandiose scheme of eugenics was to be put into effect according to “scientific” principles.”

“The slogan…[for their] their economic philosophy… Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz (i.e., the commonweal ranks above private profit)… [is also] the idea underlying the American New Deal and the Soviet management of economic affairs. It implies that profit-seeking business harms the vital interests of the immense majority, and that it is the sacred duty of popular government to prevent the emergence of profits by public control of production and distribution.”

In Australia, the term used by the decrepit “Right” and the diseased Left is neither “the majority”, nor “the collective”. They chose an infantile substitute to say the same thing, “the community”, which stretches, expands, deflates, and shrinks according to what the wheeze is.

Community rhymes with the sound cows make,

“Commoooooooooooonity”

This gels nicely with the resurrection of the cult of nature and the slogan proudly shouted by cretinous MPs busy blowing up the Liberal Party, “We are all beasts”.

They want to give the coup de grace to liberalism and capitalism; they want to overcome immoral egoism by altruism; they plan to replace the anarchic democracy by order and organization, the society of classes by the total state, the market economy by socialism. Their war is not a war for territorial expansion, for loot and hegemony like the imperialistic wars of the past, but a holy crusade for a better world to live in. And they feel certain of their victory because they are convinced that they are borne by the wave of the future.

Just as “Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini constantly proclaimed that they were chosen by destiny to bring salvation to this world”, against economic liberty, so did both the French and the Germans on the road to WWI. The same false morality is to be observed of the U.N. and boosters of that monstrous body, and the E.U. And also of the likes ofTurnbull, Greg Hunt, Abbott wrote it in his manifesto, and it litters the speech of Rudd and Wong.

I remind readers of the couple who were children in 1930’s in Britain. They were shocked into silence as they listened to Kevin Rudd. They said he sounds like Hitler, that listening to Rudd is like hearing Hitler’s national socialist slogans all over again. This, from a couple who hitherto had never compared anyone to Hitler. They were in tears. The more I listen to Rudd, I have to say, I can only conclude that they are dead right, for the couple drew attention to expressions that littered Hitler’s speeches in the 1930’s that also litter Rudd’s:

“We the nation will overcome…”

“We will build a new future…”

“Together, we the people will build the nation…”

“We need to make these sacrifices for the sake of our children…”

Rudd is also fond of stressing, “I am your Prime Minister… your leader…”

That elderly couple wept because Rudd refreshed memories that are best left well buried.

Let’s get this right:

A Prime Minister is merely the 1st minister among equals in Cabinet. Nothing more, and not a bloody Reichsfuhrer.

Well, we can all thank the Right for an Australian Reichsfuhrer, a little, over-promoted, ignorant, feeble little slob who might be Catholic in name, but not in confessional substance, for his position is also virulently anti-Christian and anti-Catholic in particular. Rudd seems tough only because he shows a very nasty character; he violently abuses those who are not in a position to deal back what he deserves. Fancy that, a gutless, schoolyard bully as Reichsfuhrer Prime Minister of Austral Department of the Greater World Soviet Union the U.N. Australia.

Thanks very much, the Right - wreckers of the Liberal Party, for your treacherous betrayal of principles, the genuine Liberal Party, and Australians to the hard, diseased left. What a fine achievement these parasites have recorded - a fascist regime. Mind, it’s a fitting tomb for Peter Costello’s reputation as an economic genius.

I implore any MP who has any principle left in them to forget them-self and for once in their parasitical life do the right thing by Australians. Yes, you too, Mr. Barnaby Joyce. There is not much time left. But, act! And, for once, drop the arrogance and turn to those who can advise you soundly, and I do include Mr. Gerard Jackson of Brookesnews and Dr. Frank Shostak as two gentlemen you need to hear.

‘Happy New Year’, rings hollow. I’d sooner eat soap coated in salt than utter what will show out a very nasty lie.

Illness over, the Christmas break at an end, we are back in the saddle, and we will commence with picking up matters indicated before being laid low by a pretty nasty dose of something that laid one low all last week and right through Christmas. Mind, spending Christmas wrapped up in blankets in a feverish sweat, constant nausea and not having eaten, by the end of the day of Christes-masse, for 5 days, is not by any stretch of the imagination unfortunate, unlike those who have something to be in misery over during the festive season.

So, back in the saddle and I’m dusting off the knuckle-dusters and polishing them and soon enough, later today, the 1st posts will be up and we won’t let up and those who are in for it know what this means - particularly since I feel fit and keen again - always a pleasant sensation after an illness. Another, great thing about an illness is that it’s temporary, where-as wielding the pen is life-long. Needless to say, the last thing one wishes for some types is a happy New Year, I hope they ruddy well choke on reading this. Douglas is back in action and unlike this now nearly past year, there will be no long interruptions to the work and service of Mangled Thoughts in 2010.

Apologies readers for no postings this week but I was hit by a particularly nasty virus. Now it’s Christmas eve. We shall resume next Wednesday.

Merry Christmas.

For the first time in decades, something approaching a full defence of inalienable rights has been mounted. It’s not news as such - Barnaby Joyce is giving the Right, and the Left heartburn, but it’s the first time in many decades an MP has stood up and done what an MP and every MP should do.

The cause is the Peter Spencer case, who alone has taken a stand against theft by politicians and bureaucrats of property rights. There is far more to unwind on this than is transparent. However, having hammered the point about the overthrow of inalienable property rights on the internet since roughly 1995, suddenly a politician has twigged that there is something wrong and that he and his fellow ‘tin pot goddies’ and an army of goons called public servants are the culprits, oh and their advisers. Now, I’ll stop here, because there is a mountain range of points to unfold on this and, being Saturday evening, it is too late family time to do it.

I’ll keep it at this, - and given also that as promised yesterday evening, today was to be devoted to ripe material. Now, after the morning’s work, as mentioned, then an interlude, itself interesting, I had late afternoon another interesting ‘interlude’ which is itself worth an article. As far as posting intentions are concerned, yes, it has been a disastrous day, readers. I apologise for wasting your time by not delivering as promised. Tomorrow is Sunday, so let’s call it Monday for the delivery of material hurtful to all the sodding bastards, Right, Left and in-between  punishing Australians and, let’s be sure of this, Barnaby Joyce is one of them. Now, though cheering news, he discovers inalienable property rights. But, he still can’t make head nor tail of the real force of them.

Monday, readers, and my sincere apologies, but then I am a one man band and one man doesn’t do all the newspapers’ combined out-put and just as well they can’t compete against me because they are bloody rubbish as it is. How good is that!

One man does more than those hovels, homes to lying bastards, Left and Right and, readers, you get to read this rag for free. Gee, then you read Brookesnews and next thing you know the ACCC will have Jackson and me each on criminal charges for monopsonistic conduct. But I have my defence prepared, the world ain’t perfect.

Senior Liberal Party and City sources are demanding a few latter day “Longshanks”.

If Abbott had his wits about him, he would have run his blade through Greg Hunt. Why, will be explained tomorrow.

IPA conceded Rudd Cabinet’s carbon tax. What’s news, and Abbott did the same but there is a difference. Michael Kroger and Green cult watermelon Guru, David Kemp, had the say.

IPA has come up with another fabrication, courtesy of their Gnius College Professor of History, Chris Berg, on how Islam brought intellectual freedom to the West. Careful, guys, for I could agree because of one, fine detail:  when the West butchered the bastards.

But since it is a Kemp-Kroger outfit, Chris Berg their one man walking University, with Stinker Pinker Sinclair Davidson as their adjunct scholar of tripe, speculation is rife in less learned circles and in the City and among senior Liberals on how much did a Wasabi Saudi have to pay after their last propaganda effort, Islam and the Free Market. Oh, yes, not only is yours truly taking a keen interest in this, so are many others and to make it all the merrier, so too are Hard Leftists. Here’s the Hollywood extravaganza ‘blurb’:

  How the idea of religious toleration came to the West,

“…a central aspect of the development of liberalism… how it evolved is regularly downplayed by political…”

Date: 9/2/2010. Chris Berg

Also splashed is, Berg will set out why pensioners and those approaching pension age should jolly well earn their own keep. Not for the first time either. Calling pensioners smelly little leeches is an IPA practice -eg.  Social Justice’s Endless Maw. Mind, they are in good company. The HR Nicholls Society and the CIS also know propping up the likes of runty little oafs is nothing more than a backdoor socialist plot. Well, we hope Berg is consistent and accepts, when the day comes, being tossed into a garbage truck and dumped.

I will be most interested to hear why pensioners and those about to obtain it should be made to keep working until they are dead because, they only bloody well paid taxes all their lives because politicians decided to keep what was a war tax to pay for war, income tax, and told all Australians they will enjoy an indexed pension. Well, some do: Politicians and retired top Public Servants, as a few of the Right wing gurus are, can explain what a splendid scheme it is too, because no other sodding little pensioner can.

Today, even the worst off modest pensioners are lucky to receive a full pension. Whether they do or not do, it is so bloody inadequate they have to go out and work! Unlike the Kemp clan, their inbred cousins - Berg springs to mind, and their new putative boss, Michael necrophiliac man Kroger. And these sodding parasites wonder why so many voted ALP. Well, shit runs and this is what that lot have, shit for brains.

I know what will be missing in Berg’s tour de force, the intellectual history of Western civilisation entire. I would like to set out what will be said. It is easy to predict but, heck, why kill the surprise and give these kindergarten hacks a chance to try and find someone even more developmentally arrested than they are to take the punishment than Berg, as well as his congenitally twinned idiot soul mate, Andrew ‘Andy Pandy’ Kemp. I doubt, however, someone so genetically enfeebled can be found because they would have died at the moment of conception.

There are some other surprises smelly I won’t foreshadow - reduces slightly the pleasure of lobbing them. This is a short note to say, today was spent in tracing out and tying together some nasty matters that are hurtful to not only the left, but also to the Right. Tomorrow, after a couple of jobs in the morning, we shall have fun posting.

Readers, carry a lantern walking into “Right House”. You spot diseased little sorts and then, watch out for the bubonic plague carrier, rattus rattus.

That is what it amounts to, and carbon taxation amplifies the fact rather well. Substituting the expression “carbon  reduction” makes no difference to the force of Tony Abbot’s position. ‘Carbon reduction’ is only a euphemism for carbon tax. Any type of this tax destroys  capital. He asserts that ‘carbon reduction’ can be costless, or at least not so devastating as Rudd’s ETS, which is a capital tax. So, while it is a relief to see the end of that dictatorial blowhard, who is keen on not merely the immiseration of Australians but far worse, Malcolm Turnbull, the truth is, things are no better.

It is not only that Green cultists such as Greg Hunt hold Liberal seats. That, statists still dominate the Party. There are still others who, though they oppose at least the worst the Right and (not to put a too fine a point on it) Leftists in the Party dream up, remain wilfully ignorant of what they need to be armed with - sound economic reasoning and advice. The CIS, IPA, HR Nicholls do their bit to ensure those members do not enlighten themselves.

The upshot is not only was there Leftist Brendan Nelson, followed by aspiring dictator Turnbull. Now we have Abbott. The unpleasant truth of the matter is, there is no-one who could be contemplated as a genuine Liberal Party Opposition leader and future Prime Minister. The Right have worked hard to make sure no genuine talent emerged, and this is the only effort they have put into anything that counts. The latest testament to this is how they knifed Dr. Jensen in the back. Jensen obviously slipped under their talent radar detector, and thus couldn’t wield their anti-talent weapon against him before he was selected and won his seat. The weapon, oh just a bit of thuggery and branch fixing, the usual tactics of the Right.

What’s wrong with Abbott, readers might well ask? Several things. He’s ignorant. Rhodes established his scholarship to select and promote men of brawn, not brains, to fight for the British Empire, which translates today into Commonwealth and, crucially of Abbott, Australia. What is there to fight for ? I know, the grounds of freedom, and this means genuine free markets and the rule of common law, and these pins are under assault and the worst of it is, The Right have not only discredited the fight but themselves have dreamt up much that overthrows free markets and so Liberty and, as we shall proceed to examine, Abbott is committed to causing even greater damage.

Rhodes scholars, brawny, fighting gentlemen and nothing wrong with this sort at all. There can be drawbacks. During the fight for free labour markets, and it is not over, Abbott as one of the Ministers charged with running the Cabinet’s case was safe when he stuck to one correct point, they clear unemployment. After that, he committed the fallacies that sunk reform. He sunk.

It might be said, it’s not entirely his fault, because with the rest of the Cabinet he was reliant on the advice of the HR Nicholls Society. On the other hand, Abbott didn’t do what his colleagues also didn’t do and are too lazy and arrogant to do, seek out alternative advice. In this connection, Peter Costello shines.

If Costello is the economic genius so many have proclaimed him to be, including Costello-Kroger toady Andrew Bolt, why didn’t he spot the nonsense and falsehoods and, indeed sheer asinine drivel of Des Moore, Ray Evans and Hugh Morgan and seek out those who could soundly advise Cabinet? Mind the HR Nicholls club are his pals too, and the funny thing is, Abbott is one of it’s inmates. The truth is, he didn’t, so he didn’t, and he couldn’t anyway; he is illiterate in economics. We won’t dwell on Costello here, he’ll be served up in items on manufacturing.

The Right’s destruction of the fight for free labour markets has tremendous consequences. One is unemployment. With it the Right and its journalists, namely Bolt, Blair and Albrechtsen, also discredited free markets and free market economics to the delight of the hard Left, and not simply ACTU bosses. I should mention, during a break away from posting, a N.S.W. union official told me direct it was his job to read all that Des Moore and Ray Evans wrote and said on labour markets.

I have to admire the chap because reading through their ‘papers’, as well as the rest put out by the HR Nicholls Society, IPA and CIS, is teeth gritting stuff, it is unbearable. Mind, they are a great soporific. The union official found Moore and Evans entertaining, for he quipped, “They are a pair of clowns’. He is not the only union source to have said this and also remark they couldn’t believe their good fortune that it was them and not Jackson leading the fight, for he and other officials are frank and blunt about it that if it had been Jackson they would have been smashed. 

Abbott is also directly responsible for the disaster, and the fight is not over, far from over. It has entered a new phase. The Rudd Cabinet will hammer Abbott and his  Shadow Cabinet over it. They only announced recently that this is exactly what they are going to do. How are the so-called Liberal Shadow Ministers going to fight? They have not rectified the errors they first committed, and have not armed themselves and have not sought out those who could arm them, and yes, I mean Jackson of Brookesnews, and they should also call upon Dr.Frank Shostak, for the front bench is an intellectual vaccuum. They are stone cold dead on this fight and every other fight.

Abbott’s manifesto

It’s obvious no-one took Abbott aside and gently convinced him not to publish his book, but I’m as glad as the hard Left is that he did and it really grates to find myself holding the same sentiment as the hard Left, though from different motives.

Abbott’s Battlelines is his manifesto, not a ‘vision’. What has escaped the commentariat is, Abbott’s position is central planning, the creed of the hard left. This is the short, crisp, actual force of his ‘grand vision’ for Australians. To secure this, Abbott declared in his manifesto that the federal constitution must be altered to deliver central power. Well, well, he does have some inkling on one topic, eliminate the inconvenient.

The pretext he gave is the rotten antics of States’ Cabinets. This alone shows Abbott has not applied himself one jot to considering why States’ Cabinets’ are rotten and more  importantly, the grief and damage they are causing in each state. He has not taken the steps required to arrive at any conclusions, and the matter is economics and it needs solid economic reasoning just to come to grips with it.What it boils down to is, the real grievance is reduced to a pretext to impose central planning. I’m not saying he deliberately decided for central planning, because this would presume he has a grip on economics and ideas and, importantly, their history, and that he has a brain.

The very grave problems in the states is not simply due to Leftist cabinets. The Right is directly culpable too, as the case of Victoria amply demonstrates. The trajectory or, rather, descent commenced with the Statist Kennett administration and their advisers in the IPA and CIS. Statism can, for not necessarily so, lead to absolutism. Abbott wants to make it certain.

As for Federal and States’ constitutions, there is a need for real debate, to eradicate clauses old and novel that free Cabinets to arrogate ‘power’ and overthrow the real freedoms and so property rights of Australians and on this the Right have not merely been silent. This is not the sort of Constitutional debate the Right is anymore interested in than is Rudd and the hard Left. Besides, in Victoria the Right supported through their parliamentary wing (for it is certainly not the Liberal Party that sits in Spring Street) every measure Bracks, Brumby and Hulls raised to overthrow and usurp rights, with their final act of treachery being their fulsome support for the anti-Bill of Rights.

Now, what Abbott calls for, the Rudd Cabinet is busy imposing already. Abbott’s manifesto is music to the ears of the likes of Kim “Il” Carr. What, therefore, does Abbott have to fight the hard Left with, and Rudd. Abbott and his Shadow Cabinet of mediocrities can blow bubbles, that’ll really hurt the Cabinet - suppressing fits of laughter is dangerous. This is what is called a “Liberal Party’ MP and leader.

To add insult to injury, as did Kroger, Abbott invokes the name of Menzies. Like Kroger, Abbott has demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt that what he stands for is an abuse of Menzies name. It is telling that Abbott is the best that could be found to be leader of the Opposition.

Appointing Barnaby Joyce to the Shadow Cabinet is a nice insight. Joyce supports the break up of companies. Joyce objects to outright economic destruction through carbon taxes. He is considerate in holding Australians should be immiserated slowly.

Anti-merger laws are bad for the Australian economy, Mr Barnaby Joyce

 Not to single out Joyce. There are not many on the Liberal-National Coalition benches who can withstand scrutiny.

On carbon taxes, what does Abbott really stand for?

Malcolm Turnbull is finished because of his desire to impose a carbon tax. Good. Abbott, however, has declared only against one type of carbon tax, the ETS. He stated candidly he supports carbon taxes, which is what carbon reduction is and he supports this. The problem is, Abbott has not stepped through what a carbon tax is and so what its impact is.

The  number 1 target to date is the destruction of coal based energy production and this alone is horrifying:

Coal fired stations; mines, plus all firms making capital goods or supplying services required by the coal plants and mines. Abbott should visit the La Trobe valley, first up, for everyone there knows what carbon taxation or, if Abbott insists on the euphemism, ‘carbon reduction’ means - their obliteration, which is why the La Trobians are beginning to rise up in large numbers against any carbon tax. But it doesn’t stop there.

The destruction of the coal firms and all firms involved in various aspects, means the destruction of efficient (thus why it is cheap) energy. This means every firm and household and hospital and school will enjoy a 100 percent power cut.  For alternative energy doesn’t cut the ice, with one possible exception, nuclear power plants.

I have a problem and it is not nuclear power as such - it’s scientifically and technologically fine. Coal based energy production is much cheaper in Australia than nuclear be a great factor. If otherwise, entrepreneurs would build them and, investors voluntarily supply capital funds so they can be built. What the Right is proposing is destruction of coal based firms so that some venal, treacherous thugs can make squillions out of the dictated replacement of coal with nuclear plants. Hugh Morgan, Ron Walker, de Crespigney worked frantically for this and all, curiosuly enough, linked into the CIS.

Andrew Bolt is using his column and weekly radio slot to push it. Sinclair Davidson and Chris Berg in their atrocious IPA paper on manufacturing concluded since carbon taxation is here to stay what else is there and the unsaid didn’t need stating, did it Sincalir Davidson ( - it’s a gag, right, that this gutless prankster is a “Professor”?). Oddly, as well as other venal vested interests, it looks very much the case that this was also the aim of the CIS’ lobby campaign for carbon taxes.

If the Right were to get away with this, the upshot, before any other consideration, would be substantial price increases in energy and this hits households and every firm - imposed cost rises that can put many out of business. But it is worse than this:

It means politicians coercing the diversion of precious capital to build what is already efficiently and cheaply done by the coal firms. This is impovershment of Australians. Worse still, the destruction of all the capital in the coal based energy firms and in all types of production of other firms they require to maintain their operations. What the Right is contemplating is nothing less than:

The deliberate pauperisation of all those engaged in the coal based energy firms and firms that supply/support all that they need to run their production. This is horrendous, the deliberate effort to make many Australians destitute courtesy of Cabinet, Shadow Cabinet and Parliament. These are not adaptations and developments driven by free markets (contrary to the bilge put out by the CIS). This would be deliberate destruction on a horrendous scale dictated by the Right and the venal interests pushing for this treacherous betrayal of Australians.

Is that what Abbott means by “less-costly”  ’carbon reduction’, only those involved in some way in supply coal based energy will be wiped out?! If it is, then let him be warned, those who are saying that are lying. Secondly, he would stand as Rudd and his Cabinet will - should they get away with the ETS carbon tax, the worst pack of criminals in Australian history. Monsters would be the correct adjective and, let’s take a stab at it, Australians would turn on them and treat them accordingly. Abbott hasn’t stepped anything through on these dangerous matters at all.

What else are carbon taxes?

“Bio-fuels, which has lead to destruction of capital in food prodcution , with farm land diverted into production of ‘bio-fuels’, which are susbsidised to the hilt. Who in the Right oversaw this scam? Why, Campbell, Kemp, and Turnbull as Ministers in the Howard Cabinet. Is this what Abbott is proposing, to destroy more food production in Australia?

Wind-farms and wave-farms, are also capital destroying scams, as the evidence from the states demonstrates all too well, and from overseas, with the most shocking demonstration to date being that of Spain. This is besides all of the very many cases already cited on this site.

Another example of a carbon tax is when Steve Bracks and Hulls came up with decree 200097812 which says it’s a criminal offence for the coal firms in Victoria to sink capital into their plants beyond limits imposed by these 2 gangsters. The upshot is:

The firms have not been able to increase their scale to cater for new levels of demand; they can barely meet maintenance. Compounding this crime is, due to the threat of a federal carbon tax, investors are not supplying the firms with funds for their capital requirements. It’s understandable, for who is going to buy capital in them when the politicians are going to destroy it. It showed:

The blackouts last summer and the deaths of all those Victorians as the consequence. Let’s spell this out, those Victorians were killed with this green cult policy. Why shouldn’t the Victorian Cabinet be charged with murder, as also over the bushfires - also entirely due to their green cult ‘policies’? Not that all this disturbs Abbott’s developmentally arrested Green Cult Guru, Hunt either.

Yes, Mr.Abbott, Victorians were killed by means of such policies and it was politicians, charlatans parading as scientists and jack-booted bureaucrats who did it. Ponder it Mr. Abbott, particularly as Victorians will enjoy more of it this summer. Imagine what a ‘National” carbon tax will do.

So, what does Mr. Abbott mean by costless or relatively costless carbon reduction when what it is is taxing, destroying capital. Greg Lindsay of the CIS asserted carbon taxes can be costless too; is this Mr. Abbott’s source of ‘advice? To whom!

Abbott’s position concedes lies which the Rudd Cabinet relies on, purveyed as science and economics, to justify their carbon tax. It is an assault on science and a descent back into ugly, primitive beliefs in magic - by gum, Abbott is a right genius. Lastly, as Rudd’s ETS scheme shows, it is totalitarian in force. Well, it is easy to appreciate why Abbott can have no objection to this side of carbon taxation. A man who demands the imposition of central planning can have no such objection to such fraud, and treachery against Australians.

To add insult to injury, it was reported yesterday that

TONY Abbott will today accuse Kevin Rudd of attempting to use his proposed emissions trading system to disguise an old-fashioned Labor-style attempt to redistribute wealth to the poor.

Homing in on Mr Rudd’s assurances that he will compensate low-income earners to the value of 120 per cent of the impact of the CPRS on their living costs, Mr Abbott will say: “This is a redistribution policy dressed up as a climate change policy. The Liberal Party, by contrast, doesn’t like new taxes, doesn’t like politicised handouts and doesn’t like new bureaucracies.”

Actually, should the ETS be rammed down, Australians, including firms deserve compensation, out of the assests of all those who would be responsbile for this crime. But it would be too late. The economic destruction of Australians cannot be compensated for, a matter the CIS also lied about and it is most curious the Rudd Cabinet parrotts the CIS pseudo-economic case verbatim.

The  origin of the word poor is humility and this is the accurate defintion of the Greek word for humility used in the New Testament to translate the semitic word. The humble, Mr. Abbott. Men bent on central planning and carbon taxation are not humble one jot. There, this takes care of gibbering clerics too, including Peter Costello’s Leftist brother and Green cultist, pretend apostle in Christ, Tim.

The word destitution is accurate for what is usuallly meant and there will be many in that club, by the millions, once carbon taxation is rammed down entire the Rudd way, or the Abbott-Hunt way. The CIS asserted Australians can be compensated for the impact of carbon taxes through inc0me transfers. This is false. When the means that generates income is destroyed, what is there left for anyone to enjoy, let alone for politicians to redistribute?

Here’s the rub, many Australians are being made destitute through larcenous ‘policies of local councils, States’  Cabinets and Federal cabinets. There is more to this than meets the eye. Rotten monetary policies of the RBA, and other rotten economic policies of the Federal Cabinet have lead to the contraction and shutdown of manufacturing in Australia. We are talking about real impoverishment of Australians. And many others finding themselves brought to the point where they are now struggling to tread water. How are they to be compensated. Regulation alone has caused great damage. But that’s ok, why worry when insane Green policies will really finish everyone off.

Capital accumulation raises wealth. Why can’t modest Australians not merely apsire to be wealthier, without vainly turning to the lastest craze, professional sports? The Right are responsible for many ‘policies’ that have made the aspiration become a wish for many.

Now, Abbott recognised the ETS is a tremendous tax, though he has not mustered why it is a destructive tax. Abbott also treats it in terms of income alone but what generates income the Right refuses to attend to, and the CIS, IPA and HR Nicholls Society never have. They are void in capital theory as well as much else in economics and so is Tony Abbott. 

So, this genius finally reduced what is a very grave matter to one of redistribution, insulting modest Australians, many of whom are now realising they will be wiped out because the firms in which they earn their incomes will be destroyed. This point, as a matter of fact, is brewing into a split of unions from the ACTU and ALP. Yes, readers, union officials realise the ACTU bosses and the ALP are abandoning modest union members and Australians for a dastardly scheme.

All that Tony Abbott can make of it is that’s it’s a matter of income adjustments and the ALP’s love of redistribution. This is a reprehensible trivialisation of the matter, loaded with something else. However, there can be no transfers because carbon taxation will destroy all that generates incomes, capital.  

The Right holds modest Australians in contempt. The Right spurned the notion they had to convince modest Australians with sound reasons of why free labour markets are good. Now we see it again, with Tony Abbott in god Right-wing style -speaking ex cathedra and down at them by sneering at what the man in the street is now realising with some clarity and more than slight apprehension, their immiseration.

The man in the street who has to go to work in production to earnhis income, knowing that with investors and the firm they are compelled to also supply income to many - try those in government who don’t. The poor sods who are wondering what they will do should the carbon tax bomb be dropped. What are these modest Australians saying in increasing numbers each day, in the streets, “There is no income compensation.” They are dead right. 

I am disgusted, I truly am. The Right in action. And this same ‘wannabe’ Prime Minster has the hide to say as reported:

So it is no wonder Mr Abbott will declare that the economic effect of placing a value on carbon emissions through the introduction of the CPRS would represent the most pervasive extension of government regulation since World War II.

This, from a man who is calling for outright central planning!

Abbott declared:

“The first rule of politics is that oppositions don’t win elections, governments lose them,” the speech says. “The second rule of politics, which the Liberal Party has just rediscovered, is that governments can’t lose unless they actually have an opposition.”

This is the Michael Kroger strategy; let the ALP inflict pain and when Australians can endure no more, they will come running to the “Liberal party’. But what is really meant, is run to the Right-wing clique who hold no genuine Liberal principle, and this means genuine free market principles. Best of all, and when they have come running, the Right will do anyway to them what the ALP plans. It is pointed to link an open letter to the Prime Minister of New Zealand, whose National Party is the same as the Australian “Right”. 

Lord Monckton, as one has observed before, is forthright and courageous. In his open letter is a very interesting reference. Not with precision but Monckton also takes pains to explain that any carbon reduction scheme is the destruction of capital and it is devestating for all who are made to endure it. Monckton also doesn’t hesitate in  stating that it also entails totalitarianism. In it, he quotes accurately Jackson’s analysis of its impact.

Unlike Abbott, Lord Monckton is first a fine scientist and, secondly he is engaged and active, and curiosity driven outside of science, and this further motivated by his sense of duty to the British through the House of Lords and also out in the open. He actively seeks out alternative sources, and he also engages in what the Right in Australia never have done, debate, and debate against the hard, treacherous Left. Abbott has nothing to debate, his manifesto demonstrates that.

One statement in the letter is inaccurate, “Adam Smith is the first economist”. Secondly, Adam Smith committed errors that had been demolished long before him. However, Monckton is the sort of gentleman who enjoys open, frank engagement, and the history of economics is far more absorbing than can be gauged from standard university courses (can’t be done because it is not unfolded in undergraduate courses).

From: The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley

To: John Key, Esq.,

Prime Minister of New Zealand and Leader of the National Party.

Sir, 

Open letter about climate science and policy (part two)

 

Abbott should read Monckton, and then he needs to knuckle down to what he really needs to come to grips with if he is to be a Prime Minister worthy of the name Liberal. Right now, it is nice to wish him upon the ALP but the ALP are happy for him to unwittingly serve them from the Opposition front bench as their outer outer Cabinet Minister.

Readers, the word pessimism is an understatement. For, oh yes, the Right is selling out Australians to the hard Left. Unfortunately, there are those such as Abbott who don’t have a clue as to that is exactly what they are doing. His ‘manifesto’, his support for ‘carbon reduction’, and his complete confusion over carbon taxes and it’s impact are chilling.Whoever is advising him should be given the boot quick smart, and replaced with those who do have a clue, before Abbott and the rest of the Shadow Cabinet and their ‘advisers’ can cause any more grievous damage.

Andrew Bolt, if he were blond, is the male of the female specimen bimbo. This $4k plus a week Kroger-Costello shoe-shine boy, to refresh, called modest Australians ingrates because they didn’t realise they earned what Bolt never has, $4k plus/week and because they were not about to vote for the world’s Ultima Pulitzer Bull Puller - tra lalalalal, dual economics and jurisprudence, Peter Costello.

Pete the Prat (to his leftist pals), unlike his brother Leftist and two-faced hypocrite, Tim Costello, otherwise alike in being paparazzi flash mikes addicts, fled to join the Liberal Party after his ’stoodent ooonion’ Lefty ‘bruvvers’ called him a pansy, biffed him on his proboscis and ALP machine heavies told him he’s a sodding little squealer for whining about it. What else could a nice toe-licker do but in tandem with his buddy, Michael the necrophiliac Kroger, bend low and lick the toes of the very gee jaws who have wrecked the Liberal Party and imposed Kroger as Chief Tosser in Chiefy Weifyness.

Leftists, as we shall recount and added with new intelligence, are still so happy that they could be investigated for possession and using and cleared of drugginess. I know if I faced the likes of Abbott, Turnbull, Bishop, Hunt, Helen Kroger, Minchin, Michael Kroger, Ted Baillieu, David Davies, et al, I’d be had up on the same charges. Throw in IPA, CIS, HR Nicholls Society, Samuel Griffiths Society and sundry other inbred cousins and, well, 2010 will be all purple and polka dotted. I’ve digressed; back to the unicycle pusher, Andrew Jumbo Bolt.

Andrew Bolt bike pump man recently declared Rudd is ’authoritarian’, over ETS and the pulp used to justify what, in an earlier day, would be called the spade it is, totalitarianism. Now?!

He piked, calling it authoritarianism. He wears the dunce cap for no rotten reason. I mean to say,  in his supine position - in his case flat on his in-built food holding apparatus taking it all in, what does he make of his “right-wing” pals whose Fuhrer impulses make my treatment of snails, ants, kangaroos, snakes, rabbits, crippled dogs and sundry beasts, and trout, smack of all the highest virtues informing the gentlest of gentlemen - just me, my rifles, guns and rods, and game and vermin. “Well, asp, are you feeling lucky.”

I must be an a-spinal, pillow biting, sand hugging pansy, measured against Bolt. Must be. I mean to say, never crawling for a $4k plus per week job , prepared to fight for his country against the sort of guys (Islamo-fascists) that would make the the toughs running riot in Melbourne shite their pants every second they live, who has already dealt with a gunman, in dinky hell town, aka Melbourne, and other pansy antics I won’t relate because a gentleman simply does n0t do that, I know I’m all yellow when compared to Mr. Andrew “Bulldog” Bolt.

For cartridge-less Bolt won’t confess the hideous, apparently, truth, his ‘right-wing’ pals are the same, which is why we have the brown, short-panted, little fascist creep called Rudd, whom Queensland QCs want to cross-examine on the wrong side of the bench. So, Bolt bleated like Mary’s sodding little git of a lamb and said, Rudd is authoritarian. Now, Mr. Bolt, when you take off your white jacket, what do you really make of it? Tim Blair has never said boo either against his buddies, nor against leftist liars in the paper in which he features as an intrepid, fighting Conservative columnist, and the less said about  how he and Bolt slobber over the high heels of that retarded, callow, half wit, Janet Albrechtsen, the better for them: we’ll have to rectify this. for the umpteenth time.

After all, Bolt, having crawled his way to a good screw in the journalistic pay rankings heap, and really made it - and Blair too, who is living the high life attending Greg Lindsay’s smack up barbies, cannot be but the epitome of bon homme and fearless reporting. You can tell by the way they both set about blackening Jackson’s (of Brookesnews) name. These two are in good company. I mean to say, there is that distinguished Professor in economics, Sinclair Davidson, and IPA guru, whose notion of economic reasoning is to cite himself 50 times in a single tiny tome of bilge, and then smear his superiors f0r skewering the fallacies and falsehoods he writes, daily.

I have, during the time out, had some very interesting chats, and attended to some developments that are shocking and these Australians can thank what is called the “Right”. 

Last, but  not least, Greg Lindsay, John Humphreys, and the CIS.

This is Douglas Bignell of Mangled Thoughts. I’m back.

A nasty couple of months, some more of rest and, for once,  sheer self-indulgence, and now I’m gunning again and we will kick off with more new ripe material too, on the criminal operation set up by the Right, as advised by their think tanks the IPA, CIS,  the the State Trustees Office of Victoria and, by god! I wish I were a member of the bar, because I would have all responsible hung, and, readers, this is no joke.

Companies are shutting down or collapsing . I have fresh material and how the “Right’ under their guru Costello helped bring this about. Both the Right and the hard Left in Australia do really regard all modest Australians as fodder for their pockets and ‘ambitions’. I include genuine entrepreneurs as well as those on modest pay. It’s not so much as all should ‘eat cake’ as be swept off the tables of these neo-Lords , as detritus, dirt not even fit to be fed to dogs. I’m here to correct these pestilential usurers and their ‘think tank’ fellow parasites. Damn, the ulcers are already returning.

Bolt does not have the spine to do it because he is ignorant and a foghorn for the “Right-wing’ slobs - lead by the likes of Peter Costello, Michael Kroger, their half witted backers  - Toorak Brahman and Doctor’s wives. Nick Minchin, the Kemps and their family slush fund the IPA, Hugh Morgan, Ron Walker, Ray Evans, Des Moore, Greg Lindsay and his super fund the CIS and so on.

Yes, readers, the voice leonine is back. I don’t believe in roaring, just the more modest effort of using a machine gun against those who deserve far more than what they have done to Australians. This, before contemplating the Left! I’m here to serve.

The Jokers in the Right don’t know the meaning of the word, serve, which is funny because they like to accuse the left of being little dictators too. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I have fresh material, which adds to my mountain range of unused evidence.. The last three days I’ve been plotting the bombing runs. there will be, of course, a brief interlude for Christmas . You see, gentle reader, what’s to fear when you have faced the wrong sort of death only inches away, something that can  kill you only. Nothing.

The Right, as the Left, prey on  fear. Fear is the refuge of the dead and dictatorial slobs who all share one thing in common, including the Rudds and Penny Wong, they are parasites. The living fear nothing. So when I look at dead men such as “Professor” ’Sinkers’ Sinclair Davidson, I laugh. Unfortunately, it’s not the hearty, cheery laugh, though guttural , it’s the black humour, for the likes of Davidson too have caused tremendous damage. The man is not fit to be regarded as an undergraduate but he’s not alone. It’s no joke, no jest; I mean it.

Yes, “Liberal Party News: How we defraud the members and voters” sums up what this lot do daily to Australians.

Refreshed, Hell is, for the wrong types, renewed. Gad, I love blood sport; God help me, I love it.