Mangled Thoughts

There is an upside to “The chances”, the enemy gets it all at once.

After months of hard slog, a Recce Troop captures a Taliban leader in Afghanistan, takes him to a warehouse. They read him his “rights” - dice.

The Sergeant says, ”Roll the dice  and if you  get  a 1 2 3 4 or 5  your head comes off.”

The Taliban leader says ”What if I throw a 6?”

The Sergeant says, “You get to throw again.”

This is the way to interrogate Islamo enemy and read them their “rights”. They understand this. Their “supporters” also understand this.

It is why they, the villagers and townsmen in Afghanistan, are disillusioned by Mohammad’s great ‘leadership’. Reality is dawning. If this is glorious Jihadic conquest, what in the Hell is Goddy on about blasting his devotees to smithereens and, come to that, making life hell for the little guy courtesy of his enforcers. And, they are bothered about what is done to them by their “brothers”. This, before mentioning that Muslim shit-hole paradise, Iran. All self-inflicted death, no glory tends to do that.

This is another message to the “religion of peace”, courtesy of patriotic Australians and our allies delivering messages of solace attached to lead carrier pigeons fired through tubes carried by bird fanciers dressed in “eco-friendly” camouflage gardening dress.

As a keen gardener, my best friend is Mr. Roundup.

The consumption fallacy states consumer spending drives growth. If this were true, why do entrepreneurs raise capital funds? The differences between the “stimulus’ spending of each “tier of government” and Australians spending is, politicians and bureaucrats are dictating consumption. Secondly, their dictating consumption rests solely on coercion. However, as they continue on their spending sprees, manufacturing is still collapsing.

On Friday and Saturday, I had interesting conversations with some manufacturers. Those still surviving that is. Despite what Rudd, Swann, and the media commentariat say, these guys - entrepreneurs are in no doubt Australia is deep in recession. They are in capital goods and consumer goods production. It’s a miracle any production of capital goods survives in Australia because:

Even before recession, caused by what inflation is - central banks’ expansion of money (try this at home and see what happens to you), the truth is manufacturing has been pounded into the ground with regulation and taxes.

The gentlemen I spoke to are more than worried. This time of the year for the firms they run happens to be their major funds build up and planning period. They are watching their builds being diced. I cracked to some of them: “Well, if carbon taxes are rammed down no-one need bother turning up because there won’t be anything to front up to, but we’ll be too bloody busy trying to survive on nothing.”

Amid the wry smiles the following could be heard: “F…… politicians… bureaucrats. Bastards.”

On politicians, they didn’t distinguish between the Left and the “Right”.

Peter Costello, Nobel Prize wining Jurist and Economist and the likes of the Institute for Public Affairs, Centre for Independent Studies, HR Nicholls Society and Quadrant magazine are culpable for what is a devastating disaster. The hard left are where they are today and manufacturing is being eradicated because the Clique, who have wrecked the Liberal Party, are:

Venal, unprincipled, economic ignoramuses busy at only one thing, ensuring they are “OK” by hoovering real taxpayers and sending begging letters to company directors to fill their bank vaults with share-holders’ funds. These guys know the meaning of principal principle.

An uncle, who was a manufacturer of capital goods, gave this sound advice: “To be an entrepreneur in Australia is penal punishment. Don’t do it.

He was dead right. The difficulty is, if none were prepared to engage in markets, there would be no Australia. It would be a land of the immiserated fighting for mere survival. Carbon taxes will do that, reduce Australians to savagery.

It bloody well is penal punishment. During much of my lifetime, I have watched firms butchered by lousy “policies”. Indeed, the whole point to schooling is to eradicate the protean entrepreneur and ensure all turn out dutiful serfs of politicians and bureaucrats. Idolaters of the “State”.

Not only the hard Left, but also the Clique holds, Australia will be truly great when all production is destroyed and smelly oafs otherwise known as Australians are made to keep their place as the serfs to them. The Clique only spelled this out in, for example, the garbage they asserted as the case for free labour markets. No, truly, this lot spot a factory and they call it a criminal offence.

Professor Sinclair Davidson is too busy trying to find out what a Laffer curve is to be bothered answering the analysis of Jackson (Brookesnews), an over-valued currency could be hollowing out manufacturing and overall the production structure of Australia. besides, along with his mates in the Clique, Professor Sinclair Davidson is also far to busy smearing Jackson than to waste his time on anything so trivial as debate on very grave economic matters. He’s a “professor”, end of debate - as far as the clique is concerned. Man, do they get upset when someone has the nerve to tell that lot the truth, they are not capable of debating anything even of ordinary merit.

This morning there was an interesting announcement. Hands up all who assumed Australian beef producers have not a comparative advantage but an absolute economic advantage?

I did. Well, now they don’t. This morning on the radio there was a brief report, beef will be imported into Australia. Beef in Australia is now internationally trade-able.

It was mentioned that this development has sparked calls for protectionism. Of course it would. Why wouldn’t it? look at the idle illiterates occupying Liberal party seats. What stood out in Professor Sinclair Davidson’s IPA article on manufacturing, with ‘co-author” Chris Berg the retarded, developmentally arrested editor of IPA Review, is he positively invited “industry policy”. In case anyone is unsure as to what is wrong with “industry policy”, it was the “economic policy” of the Soviet regime.

What is telling is, entrepreneurs are angry but they have no confidence in anyone fighting good causes. Why should they? It’s telling, because of the sheer damage the Clique and their clunker tanks has wrought that the backbone of Australia are fatalistically accepting the destruction of production. They Clique has reduced entrepreneurs to stoical acceptance of total ruination.This is the sum total of the Clique’s efforts over decades, and having enjoyed eleven years under Peter Costello the Wizard Treasure of the entire universe and Kennett and Stockdale, the Maestro builders of Vic Crime Inc.

They, manufacturers, know what carbon taxes mean, as they told me in no uncertain terms. These gentlemen will be, of course, accused by the hard Left of “profiteering at the expense of workers”. The likes of Peter Costello, Kevin Rudd, Tony Abbott and Gregg Hunt won’t, of course, blame themselves for their own thuggery. Rudd, Swann and Wong, will blame it on markets. The likes of Ray Evans, Des Moore, Professor Sinclair Davidson, Ken Phillips, Greg Lindsay, the -

Institute for Public Affairs (David Kemp and the Kemp family is the IPA)

HR Nicholls Society

Centre for Independent Studies (Greg Lindsay is the CIS)

Quadrant Magazine

Along with the likes of Peter Costello, David Kemp, Senator Nick Minchin, Michael Kroger and their backers, are all responsible for this shocking state of affairs. Bye the bye, the names Business Council of Australia and Australian Industry Group are also mud. The hilarious thing is, all these blood-suckers can’t figure out why so many in business despise them and, for light relief, laugh at them.

Don’t worry Des Moore and Ray Evans, we’ll give you more “PR” too. Jesus Christ, this pair of clowns busy smearing genuine Liberals and genuine free market economists, deserve, ceaseless media attention. We are happy to oblige them.

The hard Left love them, as numbers have told me, including ACTU heavies and journalists in The Age aka “The Spencer Street Soviet”. And they also adore lesser lights such as Chris Berg and Professor Sinclair Davidson. In fact, a long list of the Clique are the Left’s pin-ups. Never mind, nothing is more important than the Clique and their “hot goss” photo spreads.

This is Douglas of Mangled Thoughts delivering what the Clique and their pet toadies - the likes of Andrew Bolt, Tim Blair and Janet Albrechtsen have never done: tough, uncompromising journalism in the defence of freedom. Unlike these incompetent, idle, gutless “journalists”, defence of freedom means also investigating and exposing the Clique who have - not might have but have also betrayed Australians:

Not, by any stretch of the imagination, because of ideological reasons, unlike the hard Left. No, they have wrecked the Liberal Party and betrayed it and Australians for no other reason than they are contemptuous of Australians.  For, they are self-promoting venal boors.

Oh, they spit on even Liberal party members, what’s left of them that is. Why, the Kroger-Costello foghorn, Andrew Bolt, himself, stated that the members of the Liberal Party are beneath contempt. Andrew Bolt also told modest Australians that they are ingrates because they do not realise they are as wealthy as he is.

This, from a $5,000 plus a week bludger who waits on the telephone to be told what he will write in his column. Readers, as related some time ago, a source who is a contractor used by the Herald Sun observed and related the inconvenient truths Bolt’s “colleagues” freely unloaded.

By that single statement, bye the bye, Andrew Bolt also discredited the otherwise thoroughly sound and thus highly moral cause of free labour markets, and convinced thousands of Victorians to vote for the likes of hard Left ACTU parasite Sharan Burrow, and Penny Wong. Then there are the likes of Greg Combet and Doug Cameron, hiding in Cowards’ Castle, who don’t have the guts to face modest union members directly out in the open and tell them to their faces that they are going to destroy them with carbon taxes. Of course they don’t and won’t. They know what ordinary members would do to them if they were to do what honesty and, crucially, Ministerial duty requires.

Australians have not seen the bottom of this recession, thanks to the Rudd Cabinet and what sits opposite pretending to be the Liberal Party. Why worry? Carbon taxes will destroy everyone anyway.

Rudd and co are, at bottom, furious because Mossad, which history is written in courage, eradicated a Muslim butcher, the enemy for Rudd’s information, using fake passports to insert their agents.

Mossad has done an excellent job in exterminating vermin bent on killing Israelis and Australians. It’s a real nuisance Australia doesn’t have a Mossad.

In case any reader considers this a Coward’s Castle type statement, no it isn’t. I’m all for doing the vermin in before they do us in. Mossad, the intelligence and counter-terrorism unit of our ally, does work that has to be done. Readers can call me a Jew.

I’m not. I do have many Jewish friends and they are  patriotic Australians. These friendships have nothing to do with this stance. The problem of any fake passport is of course it can be mistaken as the ID of anyone who does not have the nerve to face up to the enemy Israel and Australians mutually share, even though the enemy will not hesitate to do to them what they have done to many others, can be easily done away with. The “Government” can help Mossad out,  even call on volunteers if necessary for plausibility.

We are at war against a brutal, ideologocally driven enemy. They underatand only one thing: When they are wiped out. A hard fact of the matter is, faked passports are not a rarity. Enemies in the past used them. Current enemies also use them. It is a part of, like it or not, warfare.

Imagine a muslim cell using fake IDs of Westerners. It spells real trouble. The probability is high that there will be not one but, worse,  many Westerners with the same name. There can be many very many with the same name. What does this mean?

Each time the enemy uses fake IDs, any number of Westerners are suddenly put on the international terrorist alert list, beginning with Interpol’s. I don’t have the cases ready to hand to demonstrate this, but it is what has been done by the enemy to many Westerners.

Has the media ever reported these case? No. But, because Mossad killed a hero of fifth columnists in the media, it’s different. Mossad eradicated a Muslim who was until now one of the most dangerous Muslim terrorists on earth whom the hard Left adores.

It’s not about some faked passports bearing the names of a few Australians. It’s about the fact Mossad succeeded in a very swift operation in eradicating a hero of the treacherous Left. “How dare Mossad kill someone who is a “hero” of the treacherous Left.” This is what this media driven “outrage” is all about.

Me? It’s no Coward’s Castle claim this: If an ID faked by Mossad bore some similarities to mine, I wouldn’t complain. Eradicating enemy would make the error a really enjoyable bit of sport. It would be satisfying to know an accidental bit part served a good turn of tremendous impact on the enemy.

To remind readers, I have given only sterilised accounts of what the enemy do to their victims, and it does not matter who their victims are. If I were to relate the complete details of what they enjoy doing to their victims, when they are not shooting and blowing up and sending “martyrs” to blow up others, let me assure you readers:

Not one of you will eat breakfast, lunch and dinner for a couple of months. At the end of about two months, you might be able to digest some ice-cream. So, Rudd and co can, frankly, get stuffed. Mossad exterminated a number one rodent.

They know what all Australians also face, thanks to the anti-Australian twinned policies of non-selective immigration en-masse and balkanisation euphemistically called multi-culturalism.

You know what was really saddening? The sheer number on Iranians on the Internet pleading for the allies in the first gulf war against Saddam Hussien to roll through him and straight into Tehran.

The real disgrace is the allies didn’t execute in the first gulf war what should have been done. This failure encouraged the enemy in their notion that they are destined to inflict their hell on earth to all peoples.

Islam, like socialism, is barbarism writ large. We are at war.

The hard, unvarnished truth is: The Islamo fascist regime of Tehran is our enemy. Way to go US combat pilots. All that-was missing was dropping a payload on Islamo-fascism central:

Warrior in the skies inviting enemy to oblige him

Aircraft in the Persian Gulf AOR are required to give the Iranian Air Defense Radar (military) a ten minute ‘heads up’ if they will be transiting Iranian airspace. 

[What! The impertinence, of  the Mullahs in Islam Central. They need to remind themselves: When real men take to the skies over Ian, they are only going for a joy ride in their own territory. So, the Mullahs in Tehran can mind their own bloody business or take ‘heat’.]

 

A pilot overheard this conversation on the VHF Guard (emergency) frequency 121.5 MHz while flying from Europe to Dubai .

The conversation…..

Iranian Air Defense Radar: ‘Unknown aircraft you are in Iranian airspace. Identify yourself.’

U.S. Aircraft: ‘This is a United States aircraft. I am in Iraqi airspace.’

Iranian Air Defense Radar: ‘You are in Iranian airspace. If you do not depart our airspace we will launch interceptor aircraft!’

U.S. Aircraft: ‘This is a United States Marine Corps FA-18 fighter.   Send ‘em up.  I’ll wait!’

Iranian Air Defense Radar: (no response … )

[They probably had to go to the loo.]

U.S. Warriors of the skies are ‘crash hot’

Readers, I will put up more evidence, damned good evidence, of how crash hot these guys are.

Resuming the section on Hamilton’s straw woman, Janet Albrechtsen and her smearing of Viscount Monckton and nasty little misrepresentation of what he puts, she has caused damage again, she does this naturally, with her drivel. Concentrating on this walking disaster, it is easy to identify why Hamilton invokes her as authoritative support for his mendacious, asinine whine.

She finds the statement of totalitarianism offensive. Well, the major thrust of the Copenhagen Treaty was to impose a world government, using the twinned lies as the excuse. It is expressly stated in the clauses of the “Treaty”, to which the Rudd Cabinet was to be a signatory.

Even without the “Treaty”, Rudd’s carbon taxes and related ‘economic’ measures can only be effected with coercion. How does this square with freedom and capitalism? And this is Monckton’s well substantiated point.

However, to single out and isolate the question of totalitarianism is to miss the essential point to Monckton’s attack and defence. He demonstrated dramatically the impact of carbon taxes - it destroys living standards. This, Albrechtsen conveniently passed over, while not saying boo about:

-The IPA has not grappled with it accurately, let alone forthrightly.

- The CIS has lied about it because the CIS is lobbying for carbon taxes.

We shall return to this in the next section. Noting it here, is to mark how bad her “article” is. What a nerve. She attacks Monckton and covers her pals in the IPA and CIS and so forth, who deserve a thorough public thrashing over their antics in wrecking again another cause entailing grave dangers for Australians.

Not only Monckton, but all Australians have every right to be angry and see their anger accurately brought to bear in accurate attack to secure the total defeat of the two lies and the measures that if not thoroughly and soundly defeated means ruination for Australians. But Albrechtsen states Australians should be good sheep and accept whatever abuse and worse is dealt them without so much as a bleat. This callous, fatuous, shallow, conceited ignoramus is regarded as a conservative journalist?!

The hard truth the Clique won’t face, because it is hurtful, is that they have never nailed what the force of carbon taxes is. Noting their cowardice, they do fear the hard left and how. The notion of open fighting is ‘heresy’ to this lot. It is natural that, for instance, Albrechtsen finds a robust, principal driven stand and fight a criminal offence. Combine all their ‘qualities’ and what do you get? An Albrechtsen.

Oh, and a Chis Berg too. Darn! Alright, the whole lot of them. It is telling Clive Hamilton uses her as authoritative support for his diatribe.

Indeed, Albrechtsen is noted for gutlessness too. She, for instance, as the rest of the Clique, did not stand up and eviscerate the Victorian Bracks’ Cabinet over its Blasphemy ‘law’. Not a word from the whole lot. They hid in their Cowards’ castles behind firmly bolted doors.

Indeed, one of them had the nerve to claim on this site how they fought hard. I like a joke too but this guy, one Mr. Steve Edwards, was not joking. He proved it with a banal, soporific ramble no-one had read before until he shoved it under everyone’s noses on this site.

He wrote it and it was published, a he stated, “under the auspices of the Centre of Independent Studies“. Egads! You need “auspices” to even write pulp fiction. There was no fight in it, just a spineless, hand-wringing bit of tripe about free speech is a “good idea”.

A “good idea”? How about this: It’s an inalienable right and it was stolen by politicians, and the Clique’s mates occupying precious Liberal Party seats in Spring Street supported it to the hilt and it was time to stand up in public and go for the jugulars of the bastards.

Where are you Bunny Champers? Come back! Please. You are needed. ⁽¹⁾

The Clique went into hiding, but there were those fighting

1) The Two Pastors standing up to the thugs enforcing this anti-freedom decree. Did the Right come out and stand up for them, while the media were also smearing the Two pastors? No, not a peep and nowhere to be seen at all. As for Steve Edwards and the CIS, he was too busy writing his monumental thesis on a “good idea” and Greg Lindsay hard at it setting the keyboard fonts for such superficial action.

2) A few hardy types openly breaking the law to show it is nothing more than a political measure aimed at eradication of free speech and the great beneficiaries of it are, why, those fun guys Muslims. Peter Faris QC, for one. Mr. Jackson of Brookesnews stood out with a stroke of inspired tactical genius.

I was really, really annoyed. I hoped to be hauled up and show what Bracks, Hulls and their Kommissars, Sisely and Szoke, really are and what that tripe called “law” really is. I tried really hard. I broke the “law” in the most determined and horrendous way I could fathom without offending public decency.

It was cheering when it looked like Jackson had damned well succeeded in getting himself hauled off to a star chamber trial. You could see from the documents he was happily manacling his wrists to save the Kommissars time. The Kommissars were handed direct the uncompromising, well documented evidence of his heinous crimes. Correspondence showed Cabinet and their Kommissars had been caught out red-handed. Putting Jackson on trial would have seen them eviscerated and thrown into the gutters where they belong.

So, Sisely and Szoke whined and wheedled on about why they could not possibly enforce the “law” they were charged by Bracks and Hulls with enforcing. How can “Judges” concur in gross, criminal violation of the “law”?  It was interesting reading their attempt to get out of answering explain why the could not possibly proceed with action against Jackson. Are there shops that sell brown dresses for special occasions? ⁽²⁾

The champion bantam-weight of Australia and the entire Universe, Janet Albrechtsen, in action

Did Albrechtsen come out fighting? No-one could find out where her corner was to see if she had even bothered togging up and wrapping the hands.

Did she back Jackson on this? Of course not. Defending freedom is not what Albrechtsen and the Clique are about. Anything but this. Their great cause is pushing themselves and their own interests. This is their cause.

There’s nothing in it for them defending freedom and the genuine grounds of freedom at all. Besides, it would mean anyone else but them hogging the lime-light and paparazzi photo-shoots. You never get between the likes of Hugh Morgan, Ray Evans, Des Moore and Chris Berg and a camera - if you value your life.

What Janet Albrechtsen’s smears are really about

Viscount Monckton also hurts the Clique that has succeed in cutting off alternative sources of advice to the Liberal Party. Advice the Party is in desperate need of.

The Clique, consequently, destroyed fights for thoroughly sound causes. Neither has it fought politicians, irrespective of which Party, and bureaucrats over rotten ‘economic policies’ from sound principles. Moreover, their in fact anti-free market nostrums spewed out by the Institute for Public Affairs, Centre of Independent Studies, HR Nicholls Society and Quadrant magazine are the pivot of much damage the clique has caused through States Cabinets – definitely under the Kennett-Stockdale Cabinets, and Federal Cabinets. They also find publication of hard truths hurtful, very inconvenient indeed. (Reader’s, mention “STO” in their presence and watch them run screaming for cover.)

A serious political problem for the Liberal Party

They have left the Party stranded and the likes of Tony Abbott and Greg Hunt are the upshot. No principles, no brains, nothing. But here’s the problem:

How does any party expect to succeed once the electorate holds it responsible for slashing real incomes?

In view of the Shadow Cabinet’s position, it won’t simply be the Rudd Cabinet voters will hold responsible for the impact of carbon taxes and related measures, should they be rammed down. Since the Shadow Cabinet’s disagreement is in emphases only and not in substance, voters will be after their necks too. So what does this mean for the Liberal party as such?

It will also be held responsible when in fact, this rotten situation is entirely due to the Clique and in Victoria, Michael Kroger, his mates and their backers.  They are not the Liberal party but they have convinced the public that they are identical with it. We shall return to this.

The voter and also Liberal Party members have every right to be furious with what stands in the name of the Liberal Party, and those who have choked alternative sources to ensure only their rubbish forms the anti-intellectual framework of advice, “debate”, and policy formation. As for debate, that lot reject debate. They debate nothing. Mind, all this requires principles too and they have none; this is tellingly transparent in the States’ and Federal Parliamentary wings of the Liberal Party. It’s a right disaster.

The Great Upset

So, Viscount Monckton had the nerve to come to Australia and upset their stomachs. Really, what on earth was Monckton thinking running around Australia saying things forthrightly and out in the open against real opponents when they, the Clique, had safely killed such nonsense and iced and knifed any genuine Liberal with the guts, brains and ability to do it decades ago. The scorn of a woman is fury incarnate -

Albrechtsen heaved into her type-writer and it really looks like a ghost-writer had to wash it up a tad. A solid blue funk will not be kept down. It’s still a smelly mess.

She’s inane at the best of times. But when she blows steam, it’s the guys who are genuinely defending freedom who have to dive fast into their trenches to avoid the blast and flying shrapnel and then fight the ensuing rear guard actions. Yup, she’s no menace.

Clive Hamilton is welcome to her. A bloody relief really. She’s worked already: Clive Hamilton has blown his head off using her. In the next section, we shall finish exploring how extensive the carnage Hamilton caused himself is, by detonating earthquake Force 10 Albrechtsen. This is bloody hilarious. What many hard Leftists would avoid like the plague, Hamilton ran to.

My god, this is a scream. I need a break, because I’m breaking up in laughter. Hamilton, meister warrior, slinking in Coward’s Castle, relying on the a-neuronal to beef up his trash with another pile of dung. In a while we’ll have the rest up, for sure – it’s the best light comedy relief to come in weeks.

A heartfelt big thankyou, thankyou, thankyou Clive Hamilton for giving your all so generously. And, you now have a very large and very diverse audience truly appreciative of your qualities. Yes, no greater favour can I do for Clive Hamilton than to serve him up properly.

The blunt fact is terrorists, and those inside a country loyal to another country never must be tried in a civilian court. Neither does the Geneva Convention apply to them.  Consider, soldiers of opposing armies behind enemy lines out of uniform do not come under the protection of the Geneva Convention. Neither are enemy agents. They can all be interrogated and then taken out and shot. This is exactly what should happen to terrorists, including those recently convicted inside Australia.

Thanks to the open-door, non-selective immigration “policy” and the anti-Australian policy of balkanisation euphemistically called multi-culturalism, those loyal to “another country” are here in large numbers. Of course I am talking about Muslims and we are at war against Muslim enemy.

Kevin Rudd and Tony Abbott are dedicated to open door, non-selective mass immigration and balkanisation. An average of 5 boat loads of Muslims enter Australia per month thanks to the hard Left through their hero, Kevin Rudd ended the policy to stop this. And, the unprincipled, spineless spongers occupying Liberal Party seats and their clunker tanks who merely blew bubbles.

Rudd has acknowledged the real terrorist threat this now poses. His solution? More bloody balkanisation the collectivist way.

What a load of treacherous garbage from Left and Right.

Meantime, a Melbourne Judge gave to a number of convicted terrorists a maximum of 23 years jail term. This time will, of course be cut. During the prison time, as happens in American prisons, this provides plenty of time for these Islamo-fascists to recruit others into their nasty little cult. How do they do it in American prisons?

The old bad guy, good guy routine. Sugar for the receptive, intimidation dealt out to the obdurate and this is no joke.  Those bastards should not have been tried in a civilian court. They should have been interrogated and then shot full-stop.

It is time to stop Muslim immigration. We are at war. It is time to reintroduce selective immigration and reassert assimilation and bring an end to the hard left, anti-patriotic garbage of “multi-culturalism”.

It is time also to cut off the UN, a house of good for nothing parasites who are also transferring funds stripped off the backs of real taxpayers in America, Britain and Australia and handing it over to Islamo-fascists. We have summed up:

The UN, through its armUNRWA, is directly involved in brainwashing Arab children in the Middle East into Islam and Jihad. This is correct. The UN is directly brainwashing children in the Middle East to be good little Islamo-fascists dedicated to the destruction of the capitalist West, the destruction of Israel and the extermination of the Jewish people. It has put onto real taxpayers’ kept payroll hard Leftists dedicated to these aims. This is the accurate unvarnished truth, all of which is extensively documented.

More shocking is the “Right-wing” was party to this, through Alexander Downer. We have documented all this. We will throw up all the material again to ram it home. This is not to overlook those in the ALP who also give aid and comfort to murderous, Islamo-fascist killers such as Irwin whose pity is for the PLO, which was set up and funded and advised by the KGB into the 1980’s as a matter of fact. Arafat was their useful tool, as one senior KGB explained, guffawing as he related how they ran riot in the Middle East and built the mass murder up as if he were some Hollywood starlet.

There is no such thing as a palestinian people. Israel has always been the country of the Jews people from ancient times. Rubbing insult into injury, territory was stripped out of Israel to expand the pan-Arab-Muslim empire, viz Jordan and Syria.

So, a Judge in the United States gave Obama and the “Democrats” what for too in a judgment. He told a Muslim the hard facts of life. He indirectly told Obama, this is not the way to deal with these rotten bastards, and told Obama and the hard Left what real patriotism is and what it is really built on.

In truth, to treat the enemy to a regular trial is itself is a perversion of the rule of law. The Judge made this rather plain too.

So, a judgement by a gutsy Judge who stands tall. The trial and judgment was not reported by the treacherous Left dominated media for the obvious reasons:

The judge ensured an impartial trail, upheld all principles of due principles and then delivered the Judgement that also damns Obama and his fellow travellers in the US “Democrat” Party and the media. And Shamrack’s report on the on the  the latest terrorist funding antics of the UN. It is disgusting but not surprising at all that the Clique, which has wrecked the Liberal Party and the genuine defence of freedom, happily bends the backs of Australians  as much as the Left does before those vicious, lying little wannabe rulers of the world. Get rid of the UN, a taxpayer kept den of the diseased.

The transcript of Judgment (damn it, Australia could do with principled, gutsy Judges like this patriotic, upstanding gentleman)  and Shamrack’s report in Continued.

(Continued)

[Continued from, Hard Leftist Clive Hamilton has a good whine, 23/2/2010]

Reviewing Part I, Hamilton’s ABC “article” rests on nothing more than a thick tissue of fallacies and very crudely put too. This is an argument? This is the calibre of a University Professor? What a joke. Some of Clive Hamilton’s fallacies, as in many fallacies, are explored in the footnotes to this article ⁽¹⁾, so only a few remarks need be delivered here:

Hamilton’s case misrepresents the position of scientists, and we are talking of hundreds of thousands of scientists all around the world, who have thoroughly shown the lie is a lie. He uses the nasty little device of picking on a few “emailers” to assert these cretins sum up the arguments of scientists and all else who say no!

Clive Hamilton damns by generalistion anyone who opposes the lie as somehow morally deficient and worse. Accordingly, sceptics are really nothing more than pack of a few isolated malcontents unhappy with life. Hummph! Hamilton and his fellow travellers are unhappy malcontents. Capitalism and freedom makes them unhappy.

Hamilton’s proudly mounted great defence is a feeble (and this is an exaggeration) fallacious moral argument written in crude, bilious drivel.

This is an argument? This is Clive Hamilton’s defence of lies? This is what ABC boldly publishes on its website as gutsy analysis and commentary? Of course it is, to the hard Left. It is their cult and aims that counts, not the truth. It’s no wonder so many taught by hard Left “Professors” turn out twisted cultists.

Sadly, there is no let up in Hamilton’s soporific, trashy little exercise in mud throwing. It must have really strained the full capacity of his intellectual powers to deliver it, as other ‘articles’ he writes shows by their inferior quality. Let’s not forget, it is one of his most considered articles on what is a very serious matter, involving the corruption of science, totalitarian measures and economic destruction, the causes he fully approves of and advocates as his “articles” demonstrate. And, we are still to complete the item on the CSIRO.

The rest of Clive Hamilton’s magnificent whine

Hamilton sets up a straw-woman as evidence for his banal tirade, Janet Albrechtsen. Albrechtsen has caused great damage to grave causes. She’s still at it. Hamilton cites an ‘article’ by Albrechtsen as damning of sceptics. It’s bad and it’s false.

Typically, Albrechtsen’s notion of arguing and fighting is character assassination, and whom did she do this to but Viscount Monckton, whose integrity is beyond question. It’s a real contest between the likes of Albrechtsen, Helen Kroger, Greg Hunt, Julie Bishop and Tony Abbott for the Human Freezer of the Year Award.

As in some of her nasty little rants, Albrechtsen commences on a reasonable, promising note and it’s all downhill after one sentence,

“IS it too much to ask for a measured climate change debate in 2010? Looking back at 2009, it’s hard to think of a more frustrating debate than the one about anthropogenic global warming.”

Quite. Here she begins her descent into adolescent stupidity,

“Yet frustration only grows at the extremism on both sides.”

She degenerates through a controlled tone. The measured tone is not Albrechtsen. After her stupid sprays against Buchanan and Woonray⁽²⁾ and calling aspiring homeowners and financial markets’ traders criminals⁽³⁾, obviously someone in The Australian is excercising tight editorial control over her. The measured tone is not Albrechtsen.⁽⁴⁾

Who is this “extremist” Albrechtsen slates as discrediting a “debate”? Why, none other than Viscount Monckton. Maintaining the tone of sweet reasonableness, and anyone could be forgiven for assuming the entire article was ghost-written” because it is not her typical style, she begins her damnation of Monckton:

“To those with an open mind, Monckton’s fact-based questions demand answers from our political leaders. To this end, he will impress his Australian audience over the next few days.”

A “few days” only, and this is her explanation of why:

“More important, it damages the debate. You… look like a crank… describ(ing) opponents as Nazis and communists. You can see how it happens. Talking to a roomful of cheering fellow travellers, the temptation is… hyperbole. But if your aim is to persuade those with an open mind, this kind of talk will only turn people away. Warning people about the genuine threat to national sovereignty from a centralised global-warming bureaucracy is one thing. Talking about a new front of communists marching your way is another. It sounds like an overzealous warrior fighting an old battle.”

Albrechtsen, typical of “Right-wing” journalists, investigates nothing. Albrechtsen is either ignorant of the facts or is lying. I can’t tell which.  She can clarify the question but what she wrote is mendacious.

Monckton has faced Leftists in Copenhagen. He was forthright there. He has been forthright in his open letters to the Prime Ministers of New Zealand and Australia. He has been forthright in Australia.

I attended the Melbourne leg of his tour and he said the same thing he has stated before, in front of the audience in which sat hard Leftists. He didn’t simply level serious claims in safe company. Since Albrechtsen is a journalist, her item ghost-written or not, she is lying on this count alone.

It is worse, for her. Viscount Monckton, unlike her chums of the Clique that has wrecked the Liberal Party, never has and does not hide in Coward’s Castles, including the media. He has faced the hard left out in the open and has been literally brutally bashed in Copenhagen by State Police for daring to do this. Albrechtsen has the nerve to slime Monckton with a lie and the lie is this:

Janet Albrechtsen called Monckton a coward.

It is the exact force of the paragraph. Well, it looks like her editorial controller didn’t learn a trick from the Buchan-Woonroy “stunt” either. The lesson is: never let Albrechtsen write on any serious matter because, she drowns it in shite the moment it occurs to her.

Monckton did not and has not declared, for instance, Rudd is Hitler, in contrast to hard leftists who have equated Howard with Hitler.

A break

Readers, I have to break this item up, one more item again.  The reason is as, for example, the CSIRO and Mr. Ben Eltham’s economic  articles (both yet to be completed) for the Real Matilda, too rich for treatment in a single item. The next item on Clive’s tripe follows shortly.

Footnotes will be given separately once the body of this item is complete.

A Note

I repeat again, I acknowledge and respect Mr. Eltham’s integrity shown in his willingness to debate the matters concerning taxes and capital. I apologise to Mr. Eltham for not having yet delivered the third part. Though, unless mistaken, Mr. Eltham, and all who have followed it, can infer the conclusion because it follows from the case put.

Clive Hamilton and his mates can’t take what is coming, a hiding from modest Australians weilding that terrible weapon, the vote. The truth is of no concern to the ABC, aka the Australian Bolshevik television Comintern, has wasted no time in bringing their pet “gun” to bear, Clive Hamilton. What a risible joke.

The Left are in a flap. What the unprincipled spongers occupying Liberal Party seats and their little mates in the Institute for Public Affairs, Quadrant Magazine, and the total sell-outs in the Centre of Independent Studies have so abysmally failed to do, the modest Australian is succeeding in. It is the modest Australian who is set to defeat the twin lies and the Left know it.

The Left in Parliament today whined they have lost electoral momentum in their drive to impose the  horrific fraud of carbon taxes and related measures that does require totalitairan measures. What has concentrated the attention of the voter is the dawning realisation of what carbon taxes means. A happy upshot is, voters are also realising the excuse for the progrom, Co2 emissions causes climate change, is also a great dirty lie.

Rudd and his hard Left mates are staring over the edge of a  precipice. They know modest Australians will shove them down it should they impose the progrom and this is what has upset the Left, they see their dream to impose socialist hell go down in voting Australians flames.

The ABC, whose extensive propaganda efforts include that vicious attempt to brainwash children called “Planet Slayer”, wasted no time. They called on Hamilton to rescue Rudd and Wong and the progrom.

Clive Hamilton, wealthy hard Leftist on ABC in action. Ha! This is his awesome fight, inflating little balloon men and popping them. Bravo. Darn, I spluttered good scotch laughing.

I mean to say anyone who can write that tripe is in all seriousness a good candidate to replace Chris Berg as editor of  The Institute for Public Affair’s Review magazine. Let’s lift out the essentials of Hamilton’s great bleat, “Who is orchestrating the cyber-bullying” (Part I, Part II).

“The floods of offensive and threatening emails aimed at intimidating climate scientists have all the signs of an orchestrated campaign by sceptics groups. The links are well-hidden because mobilizing people to send abuse and threats is well outside the accepted bounds of democratic participation; indeed, some of it is illegal. And an apparently spontaneous expression of citizen concern carries more weight than an organised operation by a zealous group.”

First, let’s make this crystal clear. Threats and such like are nasty and can be criminal actions. It is, to say the least, offensive. But consider what he said, “orchestrated campaign by sceptics groups” and to reinforce this, he opened with the reason for this tripe:

“The new Government promised to spearhead world efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Today it’s on the run, retreating from a surge of militant anti-climate activism that believes climate science is a left-wing plot aimed at promoting elites, wrecking the economy and screwing the little man. What happened?”

What happened Clive Hamilton is Australians are waking up to the fact those claims are shabby lies used as a stinking excuse to impose what is truly damnable. Best of all, evidence is rolling in in tidal waves of what the true force of carbon taxes, ‘alternative energy’ scams and other measures really is.

As for, “a surge of militant anti-climate activism”, it’s timid compared to the “militant activism by hard Leftists aimed at one thing, imposing socialist hell on Australians. Try murderous – Greens fronts spiking trees to injure, maim and kill loggers. Left fronts engaging in real terror against scientists. Carbon taxes and other greens polcies are murderous in force. Victorians have already been killed with such policies.

In the meantime, here’s a tissue, Clive.

Yes it does and how.

It was reported on the radio this morning BIS Schrapnel has concluded next year will see a return to economic growth. Their reason is the Rudd Cabinet’s spending spree. As a firm supplying research to businesses, it really should leave the consumption fallacy to keynesians. The real force of their report however is that it is misleading and let’s those responsible for lousy monetary policies and what it causes, recession, off the hook and this is very damaging. It is damaging in another way too, it reinforces the mess the media economics commentariat have made of such grave matters.

The nonsense put out by the commentariat over years now actually betrays Australians. They have every right to expect that the commentariat will accurately analyse and comment and arm in this way arm Australians. Now why should Australians be armed? Because, the RBA and politicians and bureaucrats are answerable to Australians, even though these days they arrogantly pretend that they are not, as we see once again in the case of the CSIRO.

Furthermore, far from correcting the media abuse, Quadrant Magazine, Institute for Public Affairs and the Centre of Independent Studies have only poured out more of the same bilge. In fact, without Brookesnews, Australians can be forgiven for believing there is no such thing as thoroughly sound economic theory, analysis and commentary.

It is for such reasons one leads today’s posts with applying the blow torch to the BIS Schrapnel “economic analysis and forecast”. It is very bad, misleading, very damaging. The only types who can draw confort from it are the sods in the RBA and ignoramuses in Cabinet, principally Kevin Rudd and Wayne Swann. Let’s see.

Why BIS Schrapnel is wrong

Jackson of Brookesnews has demonstrated consumption can rise in a recession. There is nothing more dramatic an instance than consumption rose in the US during the appalling Great Depression. Put another way, are they seriously suggesting consumer spending funds investment? “Economic Growth” in the report boils down to vulgar keynesianism. Consider for example, how do they account for the contraction in production for now over 2 years?

It is important of course to check the radio report against BIS Shrapnel’s published forecast It is worse than the radio report conveyed, Long Term Forecasts 2009-2024, updated February 2010. They assert, “the economy experienced only a minimal setback to output”.

It’s a scary prospect what they consider a greater contraction in manufacturing. In contrast, a firm tracked developments in manufacutring demonstrating how serious the matter is, but that firm did not pretend to argue from within economic theory. It must be stressed the only sources warning of recession from within economic theory were Mr. Jackson and Dr. Shostak on Brookesnews, with Jackson banging down in 2004 his stunning prediction of when it would emerge. ⁽¹⁾

GDP is totally misleading

So why does BIS Schrapnel hold it is the indicator of growth?

GDP is the final value of all goods and services, which is why according to this measure consumption is 70% of spending. This is wrong.

The American Bureau of Statistics does measure total spending and it demonstrates the point, business spending (spending on capital goods) is 2/3 of activity, with consumption only 1/3 of total spending. What is staggering is that there are those who assert this is double accounting - try telling that to firms making and buying capital goods! As for the Australian Bureau of Statistics, it either holds the same crude error or dismisses the important detail of business spending as not worth bothering with and beneath them. (ABS, taken with much else it does not do, presents a good case for why it should be shut-down, which would be a relief to heavily burdened real taxpayers).

The nail in the coffin of BIS Schrapnel’s “ analysis and forecast”

“Falling back on the fallacy that consumption drives the economy, the authors assert that the contraction simply “reflects slower consumer demand”. If this were so then we should expect consumer demand to start falling first and continue to fall followed by a continuous fall in manufacturing output. But this clearly did not happen.

“… it should become apparent that if our economic commentators were right about falling consumption causing a manufacturing recession then not only must the sequence in which the stages of production contract follow a strict order (first consumption contracts, then the next stage of production and so on) but consumption must also be highly variable. That this is not so is made clear by the following chart showing consumption to be highly stable compared with business investment and housing expenditure…”  [Economic commentators still clueless about the recession, Jackson, Brookesnews].

Indeed, it has not been happening over the last two years and is still not happening. Where does this leave the report? Totally shredded and buried, that’s where.

BIS Schrapnel attempts to uncover the reason for emergence of bottlenecks

And fails.

What do they mean by this statement:

“However, an upswing in business investment in 12 to 18 months time will result in a synchronisation of investment cycles, at the same time as employment and consumer spending are regaining momentum. This risks exciting a build up of inflationary pressures which the Bank will be required to head off.”

What they seem to mean is rising prices, which they define as inflation instead of what inflation is, monetary expansion by central banks. To speak of rising prices as inflation is more than problematic. Prices of consumer goods, certainly in free markets, fall due to efficient production.

The reverse can be a signal for entrepreneurs acting serve consumers by rectifying this. Needless to say, there are those who hold falling prices is deflation - imagine the consquences of policies to halt this. Oh, alright, let’s spell it out: it means impoverishing Australians. One policy that can do this is “anti-cartel laws”, which when “enforced” do break up efficient capital scale.

If they mean factor prices will rise, it could mean factors of production are being allocated to production in which they have higher marginal values of product. Now this can be problematic for firms in which factors have lower marginal values of product. Would BIS Schrapnel propose that Australians be made poorer by hampering intricate market processes to, what? Prevent this?

However, rising prices can also signal continuing damage caused by the lousy policies of the RBA that hits manufacturing right from the beginning of any recession it causes. In this case, the question becomes how great is the damage caused to manufacturing?

Before continuing, economists reading this item might conclude the above criticisms are inadequate. However, I am a layman in economics and stepping through what stands out as wrong with the report from this position. Continuing, therefore:

BIS Schrapnel on “bottlenecks” and “capacity constraints”

Only “bottles” itself up further under great intellectual “constraints”. What do they mean by this statement:

[A]  “Over a longer horizon, the re-emergence of capacity constraints is expected to see the economy experience truncated growth cycles

[B] “interrupted by debt-induced downturns in consumer spending and dwelling construction.

[C] “Understanding the nature of the situation is critical to successful business planning, and will continue to be important as many of these problems are set to become perennial features of the Australian economy.”

B.  Reasserts, of course, the consumption fallacy.

A.  Is a misconception of causality. Genuine growth, which is capital accumulation, does not cause “bottlenecks” and “constraints”. Rotten monetary expansion by central banks do because it induces factor allocation away from sound investments into unsupported production of lower values for the period.

The real problem is, of course, the distortion of the market signal that is interest rates by central banks. This is crucial and  for this reason a section on interest rates is given below and what is amusing is, a layman can write it so what is BIS Schrapnel doing?

What they assume is of course the business cycle, which is caused by monetary expansion. Unless central banks are cured of their lousy monetary policies, marked by a return to sound money, it is reasonable to bet central banks will continue to repeatedly engage in recession causing inflation in the future. How businesses are supposed to “plan” to cater for this danger is a mystery, since all actions are based on prices.

Put it another way, if it were possible to ‘plan” to counter it, what would this really mean? Secondly, given the long history of “business cycles”, it might be assumed entrepreneurs would by now be able to well do this. Why can’t they?

C.  They are ‘perennial problems” is a rather pedestrian observation which analyses nothing. Next, they miss the crucial point, they can be eradicated by a return to sound money.

That is the calibre of BIS Shrapnel’s economic analysis and forecast? It’s useless and, consequently, leaves entrepreneurs in the dark as to what they face and, importantly, what might be done to rectify a lousy cause of economic havoc. They might carefully consider, for example:

Bottlenecks and monetary policies: more economic fallacies that damage economies

How central banks destabilized the world’ s economies

The Reserve’s reckless monetary policy caused the financial crisis

What of the “Stimulus driven growth”?

It distorts production again and wastes savings simply by politicians taking savings from Australians and throwing it down what they decide to consume.  It is redistribution that adds nothing to investment. What is needed is savings accumulation matched by politicians and bureaucrats getting off the back capital and markets.

On idle capacity, something else is idle in rather many quarters

Economic reasoning.

“On the other hand, nineteenth century economists were very much aware of the existence of excess capacity. Unlike today’s economists they did not confuse cause with effect. They knew that the emergence of idle capacity and widespread unemployment was a symptom of depression not a cause just as they knew that deflation is the product of a monetary contraction.” [Is excess capacity dragging the world economy down?]

It’s more problematic, as Dr. Shostak demonstrates in, eg, Can an increase in spare capacity reduce the rate of inflation?  The shocking conclusion that escaped BIS Schrapnel’s analysts is that idle capacity can, as it were, remain ‘idle’. Again, from Jackson:

“If consumer spending were to rapidly expand the result would be a highly unbalanced recovery that would keep the higher stages of production depressed resulting in another “rustbelt”.” [What is really happening to the US economy?]

Gentle Advice to BIS Schrapnel

At the kindest assessment, their report is worthless. It would not be too bad if it had been filed in the ‘foget it bin’ and not acted on. The public impact of its release makes it very damaging. It is totally misleading, and only gives comfort to those guilty of lousy, destructive economic policies.

The best thing BIS Shcrapnel could do is to ask Mr. Jackson and Dr. Shostak to write their economics analyses and forecasts. These two gentlemen do have a solid record of proven predictions worked up from within a solid framwork of theory. Best of all, BIS Schrapnel could ask these two gentlemen whether they could simply reproduce their articles entire, for they contain all that BIS Schrapnel and those it advises needs.

They won’t if they adopted this sound advice mislead the public and cause great damage. And, bonus! They won’t be embarrassed by a report written in economic fallacies and illiteracy that are highly embarrassing to reveal, and can to some modest extent be demolished by even a layman in economics.

Interest Rates

Interest rates are not ‘prices of money’. The price of sound money is given in its basis, a commodity such as gold. A valued good exchangeable for other goods, its properties rendering it suitable for use as money. Real money is generated out of production. It has been interesting to observe those shifting into not only gold but also oil as a defence against debasment of money by central banks.

Interest rates, as Jackson carefully explained in, The nature of interest rates and why it’s dangerous to manipulate them, are the prices of time, given in preferences for present goods and savings. Böhm-Bawerk killed false explanations of interest and founded the theory of interest - the time preference of theory.

“Keynes just could not grasp that interest exists because people value present goods more than future goods (time preference). And so interest determines the supply of and demand for capital goods.”

The rate of interest is established by:

“… the marginal efficiency of capital [expected rate of return] is the rate of interest. This is the natural rate of interest and a price on the time market.”

The rate of interest not only equates supply of capital with demand for it. It is a process that occurs with time, capital goods are allocated over time. Keynes’ account of interest and money totally debases both, reducing them to mere “monetary phenomenon” of “supply and demand for money”.

Credit expansion distorts the natural market rate of interest signal informing entrepreneurs in establishing capital allocation priorities, based on the marginal productivity of capital. Every entrepreneur in planning capital allocation, while not working from economic theory, does exactly this through financial analysis.

Thus, to make explicit, interest rates balances production and consumption with time.

Credit expansion delivers the paradox:

“…gives rise to the consumption of goods which is not preceded by production. It generates exactly the same results as the counterfeit money. For under these conditions the buyer of goods does not use them to support his own production. In fact he consumes and produces nothing. Consequently the buyer of the money/or seller of goods can never realize his money, for the means of sustenance to support these newly created money was never produced. Any attempt then, to lengthen the production structure by means of an expansion in the money stock must always fail.”

Consumption rises, though the country is in recession.

Footnote

(1) More Confirmation of Manufacturing is collapsing

[The “EL Consult Australia’s  Demand Index” report of 2008. This item was written the day following its release in September 2008]

Yesterday, Mr. Montgomery of EL Consult Australia, interviewed on ABC radio on unemployment trends, related devastating evidence in EL Consult Australia’s Demand Index:

“Executive employment records its tenth fall in twelve months:
“Employment opportunities for executives have dropped further last month now showing a total of ten monthly falls over the last year.

“According to the EL Executive Demand Index this now equates to a total decline in available executive positions over the past year of over seventeen percent (17.34%).

“According to the EL Executive Demand Index this now equates to a total decline in available executive positions over the past year of over seventeen percent (17.34%).

“Produced since 1992, the EL Executive Demand Index has been found to be highly predictive of the direction of the general job market.”

Analysis of the EL Executive Demand Index and Report

What is crucial about the EL Executive Demand Index? Non-executive employment trends lags behind hiring of executives. The Index is an indicator of what will follow these trends in non executive hiring.

It is a relationship that I have observed and analysed anecdotally, because what is also important about any firm’s payroll planning is that it is important evidence of its production and investments plans for a period ahead. Now, what we have is a consulting firm, EL Consult Australia, that has developed an Index of this relationship.

The killer blow is where the nearly 20% fall in hiring of executives is, engineering. It is in the production of capital goods. Montgomery related that it is not simply a fall in hiring. Engineering executives are also not being replaced. In the radio interview, Mr. Montgomery himself stated the obvious conclusion: new investment in capital is not simply coming to a grinding halt.

There is a very grave contraction and reduction of capital in production of capital goods. It has been occurring for over a long period to date and is continuing. This means, as Montgomery also observed, the capacity to produce goods in the future is being extinguished.

Montgomery lifted out the above with the telling point:

Engineers are required for production of capital goods, the building of plant and their maintenance for production. This is not occurring. It follows, all other types of labour hired for these operations will be cut. Hiring will fall at a shockingly high rate. For the manufacturing states, Victoria and NSW, what is in train is devastating.

[What do we see since 2008? Rivers of blood in manufacturing. This, it goes without saying, also shreds the BIS Schrapnel report.]

CSIRO is dirty. Not the fillm of dust from paddocks, but the tissue of mendacious frabrications purveyed in the name of science and economics. In view of the systematic exposure of how the CSIRO has been subverted to hard Left aims, those responsible for this have now commenced ‘research programmes’ on how to extricate their backsides:

“Australia’s peak science agency, the CSIRO, has backed away from attributing a decade of drought in Tasmania to climate change, claiming ”the jury is still out” on the science.”

Bob Brown natuarally accuses one of the hard Left’s best friends on this, CSIRO, of caving into “political pressure”. Ah, no contrary to this fan of the protean Stalinist Chavez regime, it looks very much so that those responsible for pushing the twin lies, thus abusing taxpayers, are trying to find a way to protect their own backsides. I’m here to say, for those responsible there is no escape for what they have done to Australians.

To ram it home, while those responsible in CSIRO believe they can fabricate for themselves a bomb shelter, they still push not only the twinned falsehoods in the name of science and economics but also the frauds from “bio-fuels” to this:

Charge your car and check your toaster on smart grid

“The plan has been a closely guarded secret for six months, as EnergyAustralia developed its bid tactics with the support of the state government, local councils and the CSIRO. The technology companies GE, IBM and Cisco have joined the bid.”

So much for the integrity of those inside CSIRO pushing the hard Left’s aims.

Well, we have much to write on CSIRO’s pseudo-business interests. The heads of CSIRO really do have to give very, very good reasons why they should not be sacked, along with their ‘experts’ also responsible for asserting the twin lies and abusing taxpayers by taking their money and throwing it down garbage dumps purveyed as sound research within CSIRO’s remit.

This morning it was alerted that today would be a timid day viz postings and content due to an appointment for “a chat with a source… Whether the chat will prove up for another scoop is an open question. If it is, you will, readers, have it first and unvarnished.”

I apologise, on several counts:

1)  not “a source” but with a number of sources;

2)  The chat did prove up but I cannot deliver the scoop itself;

3)  Readers, you cannot have the scoop first hand and unvarnished.

The reasons why you cannot have as declared on count 3) is, I have to protect the sources.  What, readers, you will recieve  are:

- It has added great clarity to what the Clique have done. So many erroneously confuse the Clique with the genuine Liberal Party, genuine Liberalism, and genuine free markets and genuine free market economists.

- What I was told today we discussed and, yes, debated, is the extent of the damage the Clique has caused.

Matters that are grave, and they are very grave, which is why my sources unloaded knowing I betray no confidence and no man, except for treacherous Leftists;  whom, each of my sources would agree, are jolly good things to betray should, perchance, if one of these not Australian liars happen to unload to this sleuth.

It is simple as that. I cannot divulge details. I have held to this in many articles in the past. I do it today. I will do it tomorrow and the next, and until the day I cease. This, readers, is the fact of the matter, and all my sources know this.

The Clique and their clunker tanks, the Institute for Public Affairs, Quadrant magazine, and HR Nicholls Society have caused great damage by:

1) Discrediting the sound, therefore, highly moral case of free markets and so genuine Liberalism

2) Through their actions when in Cabinets, States’ and Federal, and this alone is, bluntly put, shocking. Each of the afore-mentioned think tanks have been central to what has been their systematice corruption of institutions and also the abuse of others vital to Australia as their treatment of The Armed Forces of Australia is a despicable instance.

(Greg Lindsay and his Centre of Independent Studies surrendered any prentence they had to defending freedom when they sold Australians out for the lies of carbon causes climate change and carbon taxes are good.)

It is mistaken to assume only the likes of the inmates of the, Institute for Public Affairs and HR Nicholls Society and Quadrant lead by the likes of Ray Evans, Des Moore and David Kemp and the Kemp family’s inbred pet, Chris Berg, seek to put the blame on John Howard for what in fact they did.

Now we have none other than high minded John Stone sticking the knife into Howard,

Eleven Decent Years, John Stone, Quadrant Magazine (Jan.-Fed. 2010).

The full text is not availiable yet online. I have it. It will, therefore, be great entertainment to quote it and stone it.

It should be re-written as, “Eleven Indecent Years Plus More Decades of the Clique”. That’s the truth, Mr. Stone and, worse, you know it is the disgusting, shameful truth.

We shall leave John Stone for another item and also som eone who was for all intents and purposes entombed, Peter Coleman, who also smears Howard in order to deflect focus from the Clique’s mendacity, anti- free market ‘advice’, and ‘policies’ and overall incompetence by which they discredited the thoroughly sound and so highly moral case of free markets and genuine Liberalism, and caused real, extensive damage.

The Clique have the hide to snipe at the Left when all that is contested by this lot of grasping bed-wetting parasites against the Left is who corrodes, perverts and saps things.  Yes, readers, there is genuine anger driving these words and for good reason. This reason, unfortunately, I cannot disclose. I will not betray good men and women, and I will not betray these patriots by stating details that can identify them.

Readers, I am delivering a scoop on the CSIRO before those news-hounds and  lackeys of the Clique  “report” feeds fed them by the likes of Michael Kroger. I’ve delivered many scoops the likes of Andrew Bolt and Tim Blair wouldn’t bother with because no one telephoned them or it is just too damned awkward for their patrons in the Clique. They have been damned silent on this and many other serious matters and they have all the resources of their employers to do the work I am doing.

This is Mangled Thoughts bringing scoops hurtful to the hard Left and the Clique.

God Save Australia because, the Clique have made sure nobody else can. Readers: Scoops tomorrow, including:

Sources are shocked at implications of carbon taxes for the Armed Forces of Australia. They were stunned when it was explained to them what the real force of carbon taxes is (it does mean the destruction of the Armed Forces too) and that it is the policy of not only the Left but also some of the Clique (not all, as shall be related but, too late, they as much as the rest of them have brought his about too). This and much else to come.

It’s the news the fifth columnists in the media won’t tell, and the Clique and their pets such as Blair and Bolt are too indolent to uncover and cowardly to report. What, rat on the rats that feed them, never!