Mangled Thoughts

Who are the 5th Columnists? Islamo-fascists.

Someone once recommended Hinch as the answer to the diseased Left’s bunker, the ABC. Hinch and radio 3 AW are what the Herald Sun is to “The Spencer Street Soviet” Age, an ineffectual cartoon house, with a spread of conceited Leftists in hand to really brutalise the treacherous Left.

Oh, on some things, Hinch is ok. He beats the drum against judges handing out lenient sentences to types who should be shot, particularly in view of the habit of some of them, on repeated releases to kill and brutalise more Victorians. Having said that, he’s limited, very limited and the explanation might be, he doesn’t bother to find out much on many of the topics he fulminates on.

In defence of free speech, he still fulminated against the Two Pastors, as did his stablemate sookie, Neil Mitchell. Neither had a clue about what the Two Pastors had actually said, but this ignorance didn’t stop them calling the two Pastors nasty, fundamentalist bigots. Islamo-facists certainly loved the backhanders, as they did last Friday evening.

Hinch has a burning dislike of Christians, judging by the way he rages when interviewing some, and his reception of callers. Once again, he could barely contain himself, such was his fury against the Reverend Fred Nile. I missed the opening shot but the substance devolved on, from what I gleaned, the French Government’s decision to ban the burqa. Nile remarked it should be banned in Australia too, and Islam checked as un-Australian. Hinch had a firecracker up his backside, for it detonated and he whizzed and poured out smoke.

I happen to like Nile. Far from the ogre the Left dominated media paint him, he’s an amusing, patient, principled Christian gent. In some of his public stances, he shows a propensity to enjoy being sent up. One might or might not disagree with him theologically, on some points, and I couldn’t say not having engaged with the man. However, his decency and genuine Christian charitableness are far above reproach.

Nile called the Islamo-fascists a fifth column and he is right. Just consider this item by Faris QC,

…Sheikh Taj Din al-Hilali…in my opinion, he is a brave and honest man.

He does not hide behind platitudes of “moderate Islam”, of multiculturalism and the like.

He is not frightened to tell the truth about Islam. Last week he dealt with the place of women in Australian society from an Islamic point of view.

Muslim women must be covered up because that shows their modesty and protects them from male lust.
Aussie women, on the other hand, are semi-naked, little better than sluts and prostitutes.

They have provoked the rapes. And is it really rape to have forced intercourse with a provocative slut?

I recollect a Muslim against Faris QC that they desire Australia will be put under Shria Law or, what that really means: and Islamic fascist dictatorship. He asked her, ‘well, why don’t you leave for an Islamic theocracy. Iran is one, you should be content there.’ She replied, ‘but he wouldn’t be able to earn what he earns here and we’d be worse off.’ Faris put to her the rebuttal in the rhetorical figure, “It wouldn’t have anything to do with the absence of shria law in Australia.

I remind readers of Sheik Khalil Chami’s and Keysar Trad’s recent demand for the imposition of ‘legalised’ polygamy. The force isn’t simply to give Shria Law force in Australia but this as an anvil to establish another Islamic fascist dictatorship. Hmmm, a couple of items:

It’s Fascism – And It’s Islamic, By Victor Davis Hanson

Andrew G. Bostom elucidates how tolerant Islam is:
Under Turkish Rule, Part I

Jim Ball ( also links the Hanson article) furnishes links to more items, and is neither the first nor the last to observe, for example;

The Plight of Women under the Yoke of Islam
The feminist sisterhood is very quiet on the issue of the plight of women under the yoke of Islam. It is to their shame that they allow their rose-coloured view of multi-culturalism to taint their view of such an important issue…

He has up a chilling execution:

Apostates of Islam

Last time I checked we were living in the 21 st century….Check this site Apostates of Islam and force yourself to watch the 15 minute video of a stoning. The vision is a bit blurry but we must at least make the 15 minute effort to sit through it. Think what the poor victims of this mad, insane, hysterical, frenetic and satanic behavior went through. And all in the name of God. The least we can do is to bare witness to the barbarity of this death cult…

The University of Melbourne Professor in linguistics, who supplied expert evidence on behalf of the Two Pastors, is also an Anglican Chaplain. He pastors to ‘apostates’ from Islam and has stated the fear of ‘apostates’ is not unfounded at all. This is in Melbourne. not Turkey, not Iran and etc., but Melbourne Australia.

Under the header, STONY SILENCE: Iran Terrorises Its Own People And Its Neighbours While We Work Hard Not To Offend Them, Andrew Landeryou supplies on his site photographic evidence here of -

Today twenty-nine people were executed for offences including being a public nuisance while drunk (Les Twentyman take note) and being in “illegal relationships” and alcohol dealing.

The two Pastors themselves had to flee Pakistan because the apes from the dark side of an ancient, cruddy, violent past threatened to kill them.

Who can forget the antics of the Executive of Brackistan, through HEROC, noting the blobbies holding precious Liberal Party seats back the anti-Bill of Rights. Overseas readers may not be fully apprised, yet, of what both the ALP and the Statist thugs wrecking the genuine Liberal party did to Victorians. This, by — Ezra Levant (January 2008), is an excellent indication of things neatly, inclusive of dhimmitude under the Blasphemy Law and the trial of the Two Pastors:

What Thought Contol in Canada Looks LikeDon’t say it can’t happen here. It has. This is how its done.

This is what an interrogation in 2008 looks like. It’s not in a dungeon, or even a secure government facility. It’s not done by paramilitaries in uniforms. It looks banal — in a meeting room at a law office, with a bored bureaucrat. It’s what Hannah Arendt called “the banality of evil….”

The ‘procedure’ also sums up VCAT, and it was done to Jennifer and Peter under STO and OPA ‘legislation’.

After the chat with Nile, a woman telephoned Hinch claiming to be a Catholic and she equated Catholic nuns in habits with women in burqas under Islam. She also equated Christian mission with Islamic conquest. It’s a wonder she didn’t equate monks with mullahs issuing death sentences by stoning. Hinch liked this call very much, extolling her deductive powers by, roughly, a gleeful:

‘Yes…that’s right…quite right.’

Wrong! And a lie:

1. Nuns and monks enter monasteries voluntarily, and voluntarily accept to wear the habit of their orders. They, before they are accepted, must pass a novitiate. The Abbess and Abbots are trying to establish several things such as, it’s not merely a voluntary decision, but is the motive right - an act out of faith, and not an attempt to escape life, and so forth. Even if they are passed, they are not enslaved to the monastic life. There are those who leave because even an Abbot can be mistaken.

2. Christian mission: the best have always sought to raise all whom they can from bestial and degraded conditions. Despite the repeated smears of these efforts, the record is successful. It has been done out of grace. It is the realisation of ‘do unto others as thou wouldst have done unto thee’ and as against the leftists who infest the Churches, ‘Love thine neighbour as thyself’, is no fatuous sentiment.

You love your freedom, then do not enslave others, but raise up others. The Wesley brothers took this very seriously and wrought a tremendous change, they convinced many in England caught up in despond and worse to change their lives and prosper, and they did.

Islam is all about the opposite to such principles. Islamic regimes theocracies are solid evidence of this. Down through history, they all have achieved the same glories as the regimes Stalinist and Nazi, hells on earth.

The burqa is not specified in the Koran. It was invented as part of the subjugation of women. It is un-Australian, as Islamo-fascism is un-Australian. The un-Australian diseased Left have allied themselves with Islamo-fascists and for the reason, both hate the free capitalist West.

The 5th column.

It wasn’t the man in the street who wanted the entry of large numbers of Islamo-fascists. It was the conceited, self-styled elite, busy regulating Australians towards economic ruin and stripping them of their real rights, who opened the flood gates to a population who have an aim that is singulalry unpleasant.

This 5th column poses a real, current terrorist threat, evidenced in detected terrorist cells. They provoked what was not a riot but a demonstration, at Cronulla. Locals fed up being bashed, attacked and worse tby muslims, who regard themselves free to commit atrocities against Australians because the latter are ’sluts’ and ‘dhimmis’. A situation compounded by the prior refusal of the NSW Government, as the Victorian Goverment, to do their duty to taxpayers, and to stomp hard on savages and thus protect the decent.

If the man in the street had his say, muslim immigration would be finished and many already in stripped of citizenship and expelled from Australia. Faris QC himself declared this the right thing to do.

We are at war with Islamo-fascists. This is what the armed forces are fighting in the middle east. Yet, here we are in Australia, and we have a column of them inside. And, Hinch comes out with his disgusting attack on Nile and hailed Islamo-fascists as good Australians, equating them with saintly nuns, and Islamo-fascism as Australian.

Needless to say, some Muslims telephoned Hinch, praising his ’stand’. No doubt the diseased Left also applauded.

The little good Hinch does is outweighed by the damage he causes. He can’t help it, because he’s lazy. He doesn’t bother to find out things and, consequently, wallows in the dark, while reviling a far better man than he is in one Revd. Fred Nile. Get stuffed Hinch.

Well, that’s not the headline, but it could be.

Harvard lefties conducted a poll of Arabs who happen to be Israelis. Harvard ‘graduate’ school turns out neo-Marxist cretins such as Brackistan’s Cheify of Vic Police Christine Nixon. The graduate programme Nixon was entered in is concentrated on how to bring about the wonders of socialist hell on earth. Thus, the motive for the poll is clear - Israel is anathema and, surely Arabs inside Israel will provide a prextext for abusing Israel as a “Nazi occupation cooked up Zionists”. The good professors threw up at the results.

Despite having heavily biased the poll, the Arabs showed the B.S.itters two fingers:

It is difficult to find a more neglected story than the relative satisfaction of Palestinian Arabs living in Israel as is revealed from a recent Harvard Study. (Palestinians Arabs (including those living in greater Jerusalem) constitute 20% of the population). Aware of inconvenient polls which reveal that Palestinian living in Israel are vehemently opposed to becoming citizens of Palestine, the researchers did their best to lower the satisfaction number by phrasing the question so as to receive the most negative number.

77% of the State of Israel’s Arab citizens would rather live in the Jewish state than in any other country in the world, according to a new study titled “Coexistence in Israel”.

Let’s not forget Egypt either. Though having tried to wipe Israel off the face of the earth twice, The Gypos came to realise their best pal on the block is not Iran and Syria, it is Israel. Muslims assassinated Anwar Sadat for this heresy but, they did not kill the shift. The Gyps have even copied Israel.

They have drawn the correct conclusion, the “Palestinian Territory” is a fiction told to cover up what it is, a Muslim terrorist camp and, consequently, have closed Egypt’s borders to the rodents. It might be a tad too optimistic but, then, it would be no surprise the Gypos might, underneath it all, acquiesce through inaction in Israel blowing the mullahs of Iran to hell.

This is all bad news for:

Harvard lefties. Liars in the media. ACTU thugs. The un-Australian Chavez-Hezbollah support clud, headed by such notaries as “Phuc Phil” Adams, Nettle, Bob Brown, and Keysar Trad. The ALP’s Jill Irwin, who bleats Belinda Neal is a nice ogre. The Greens. The Democrats - on whom, wiped out in the last election, my friend Strider has a nice take -

Australian Democrats leave the Senate - Good Riddance to Bad Rubbish

As he also has on Irwin and her pet ogre, Belinda Neal: Liar Liar Pants on Fire!

Oh, I cannot omit the Jew haters who have also done their bit to totally wreck the Liberal Party, the likes of:

John Valder, who said -

America is a war criminal and the liberation of Iraq “the greatest act of aggression by any Western nation since the days of Hitler’s Germany”, neatly putting Bush, Blair and Howard on par with Adolf Hitler….

He did, however, approvingly refer to the pro-Saddam London demonstration that had been organised by a coalition of Marxist-Leninists and Jew-hating Islamo-fascists.

Michael Kroger goon, Susan Chandler - one of the few Kroger thugs to be kicked off the Kroger-Costello tithe machine - the defunct Victorian Liberal Party; which goes to show that if she hadn’t supplied hard evidence by sending that email, the Jew hater would still be bludging off much abused Victorian Liberal Party members. Complete with leftie Kroger Muppet and all round village fool, Petro Georgiou, Andrew Landeryou let rip ripely.

Directly.

We are at war against enemy who are ferocious savages. Leftist journalists lie on behalf of the enemy, and to ensure the truth about the enemy and the war is suppressed. Disgusting is “rightwing” journalists in Australia who shrink from reporting the truth; sources have told me they are afraid to do this important work. Well, this doesn’t surprise me and this is besides their general ineffectualness, as their journalistic ouvre attests. All this is bad enough. However, directly aiding the enemy is treachery that warranted execution in WWI and WWII.

The enemy have no rights under US Law and Australian Law. As for the Geneva Convention, there are limits to it, keeping in view a crucial assumption, combatants serve in armies of, at bottom civilised peoples. In WWII, captured combatants not in uniform could be shot on the spot; the Geneva Convention did not and does not apply to them. Neither did it apply to civilians engaged in spying and sabotage. Neither did it apply to combatants who committed horrifying deeds.

Next, P.o.W. camps were not comfortable by any stretch of the imagination. Food, recreation, and distractions spartan to say the least. Enough Ps.o.W broke down under the tedium and day to day pointlessness of camp life. Then, the point to the camps was to keep enemy from returning to the front without having to shoot them enmasse. P.o.Ws. never had the protection of the law of the enemy.

How many years ago was it, 8/10? A number of Muslims, approximately ten of them, were released from Guantanamo Bay. They promptly rejoined terrorist cells. Until they were first captured, they were a terrifying danger to modest Iraqis and Afghanistanis. Butchers that allied soldiers risked death to fight and capture. They were released to pose the same dangers again. If this view of how to treat the enemy in WWII prevailed in the allied countries, the Axis would have won:

“Sorry, Blamey, Monty, Patton, Ike, McArthur, but we have to release all the enemy you have taken. You see, they have rights too. They have the right to be set free at home, gad about behind your back, to be allowed to return to their armies. I’m sorry. I appreciate all that your men have done, but it’s the law.”

Anybody who proposed that as a measure back then would have been locked up in a lunatic asylum, or tried for treason. Moreover, it might be difficult to credit, but for sheer cruelty the Islamo-fascist enemy exceed the brutality of Japanese soldiers and prison guards.

Then, why should anyone be surprised by the Islamo-enemy’s capacity for horrifying butchery and torture, real torture. Given what they commit against villagers in Afghanistan, in Iran, in Iraq, and Pakistan, the notion that they would be restrained by the values of decent Westerners in uniform and by the Geneva Convention shows out to be the B.S. that it is. To make sure, I repeat an account showing them at their decent best:

Taliban and Al Qaeda take villagers to caves, anyone. They suspend their victims by hooks pierced into the skin and attached to caves’ walls. They then very slowly shred them to death with fine instruments. They proceed by commencing with slithering off the skin, to the final evisceration of the intestines of their many victims. This real torture is slow; the vermin take more than a few, slow hours to kill every one of their victims.

The above is not the worst of what they commit. The victims include women and children. The object of all this decency is, to show who is in charge, to keep villagers in their place. This is all besides the savagery of the defunct Taliban regime, and the Iranian Islamic regime, with even rape victims convicted under Shria Law and, buried up to their chest, stoned to death -girls and women.

The Taliban, whom David Hicks gladly served, enjoyed throwing offenders - men, women and children, against Mohammed and Allah off the highest walls of towns. This was only one of their party tricks in peace-time. (It’s incongruous speaking of peace-time in regards to Stalinist and Islamic regimes - a callous insult to their many victims and slaves.)

Then, it is important to keep in view, the enemy are engaged in jihad. They wish to destroy Israel, exterminate the Jews, demolish the West and impose Islamic theocracy. This is no secret.

Another disgusting outrage and act of treachery is the UN brainwashes Arab children into Islamo-fascism, suicide bombing, and jihad against Israel and the West, through the schools in the fiction of the “Palestinian Territory” and “refugee camps” in Lebanon. The UN makes it plain, Israel should reconcile themselves to Holocaust II.

It is unforgivable the Australian Federal Government takes taxes and hands it over to the UN for this purpose. (I was shocked to discover Alexander Downer did not cut off the funds to those lying parasites who exalt savages over civilised men and women - but then, the UN is devoted to a world socialist vision and a free, capitalist world is an obstacle to it. It is disgusting, it is unconscionably corrupt, it is an unforgiveable stain on both major parties of Australia and it must be stopped).

Here is one of many gentlemen who entertains no delusion as to what we face:

Will political correctness destroy America? Vincent Gioia

The idea that Islam is a “Religion of Peace” would be merely comical but for the stakes involved in underestimating the evil power of Islam.

As Gioia also hammers, the problem is not the enemy in front of you that is the greatest danger, though it be a great danger. It is treacherous types behing your back who can deliver the West to these evil savages. The trouble is, the Left in Australia too, has worked hard at breaking down resistance to the enemy and, quashing any who take a principled stand. Steve Bracks and Rudd Hulls went further.

Those two thugs imposed their “Blashempy Law” to haul into prison any who defy the Left and their pals. There are few in Brackistan who entertain any doubt what that ‘law’ is really about. This monstrous “Act” was fully supported by the unprincipled cowards who occupy precious Liberal seats in the Victorian Parliament and also fully canvassed by charlatans called sociologists and half-witted, statist, barely Christian clerics (are they really Christian?). Combine it with the mush of “multi-culturalism” and ‘moral equivalence’, and the following can be observed of also some Australians:

Many, whether merely naïve or rigid followers of political correctness, continue to claim Islam is moderate, tolerant and peaceful, and that the religion “has been hijacked by extremists”. These people ignore the repeated calls for “jihad” and holy war coming from mosques around the world and the Imams who preach the mantra to kill enemies of Islam. As Brigitte Gabriel says, “They refuse to accept that in the Muslim world, extreme is mainstream.”

It wasn’t the man in the Street who brought this sad state of affairs about. Craven politicians, the diseased Left, and the unprincipled, ignorant, cowardly pseudo-Right and their falsely named “free market think tanks” did it in Australia. Just to check, for example, the IPA published the shocking “Islam and the Free Market”.

It is a complete fabrication, a deliberate lie told in a time of war against Islamo Fascists. They falsified history and then had the hide to smear Mr. Jackson, who published a devestating rebuttal of their disgusting apologia cum propaganda piece on behalf of the enemy of Australians.

David “watermelon red” Kemp’s son, Andrew “Andy Pandy” Kemp was one author. The other was Chris Berg, who in one of his limp ‘responses’ also proceeded to lay out Western philosophy and theology is also indebted to Islam. Well, I had fun in demolishing that lie purveyed as history. The Question is still being asked; how many pieces of silver were they paid to publish such a shocking fraud?

It is absolutely inexcusable of the “Right” - these stupid buffoons only score goals for the Left, play straight into the hands of the diseased Left. It is why the Left love them and wish to see them retain their stranglehold over the Liberal Party.

‘Disgusting and shameful’, sums up the conduct of the stupid buffoons over long decades; and they won’t stop it, they never learn even the simplest of lessons. They continue to wreck fights that must be won, continue to write shabby distortions - the latest great example being the CIS on Carbon taxes and, while they crawl to the Left, slander genuine Liberals. Why are companies handing over shareholders’ funds to these poisoners!

The pseudo-Right has never eviscerated the Media for the proganda they have pumped out on behalf of the enemy either. One instance is over Guantanomo Bay. Well, here is one first-hand source who sets the record straight, something Australia’s “Right” have not had the nerve to say - ( which shows how effective their favourite ‘journalists are);

Major Legal Issues [An interview with Major Kyndra Miller Rotunda, a JAG officer in the U.S. Army Individual Ready Reserve; National Review Online, 16/6/08]

Kathryn Jean Lopez: So is it Club Gitmo?

Major Kyndra Miller Rotunda: To some extent, yes, it is Club Gitmo. Detainees…

No WWII P.o.W. had it so good as those monsters in Gitmo have it. My Grandfather escaped from the Germans several times, and under heavy machine gun fire in one of them. He related that on a forced march, any man whose hands dropped from his head was shot on the spot. It was in winter, they were marching through deep snow. What a contrast.

For how long has the media lied about Guantanomo Bay? Over a decade now. It is no satisfaction to say, all those who did object, saying not one inmate (including David Hicks) was tortured, have been vindicated. The damage has been done and how.

It seems the ferocious savages inside the prison might not only be set free but freed in America. This is unbelievable, if it were not for the fact of the tremendous institutional backing the hard Left have received in pressing their aims. (This the pseudo-Right in Australia also failed to attack and arrest.) Here is the atrocious news:

US Supreme Court -
The majority justices’ response is that “our basic charter cannot be contracted away like this” and “to claim that the political branches have the power to switch the constitution on or off at will … (would lead) to a regime in which Congress and the president, not this court, say what the law is”.

The majority judgement restores to detainees at Guantanamo Bay the right to petition the US civilian courts to challenge the legal basis for their detention.

That quote is from an article by another Leftist, Tim McCormack. McCormack “is the Australian Red Cross professor of international humanitarian law at the Melbourne Law School”. I refer readers to to what Major Rotunda had to say about the Red Cross. There-in is beneath the lies the media has spun another grotesque fraud the Left has perpetrated (what does it show about some Liberal Party MPs bye the bye).

Amnesty International, Red Cross, and lawyers cried crocodile tears over the inmates in Gitmo, and how such a luxury hotel is really a torture chamber. How evil it is the inmates had their ‘human rights’ stripped off them. Never mind that they are enemy who have suppressed many in the Middle East. Never mind they are waging jihad to massacre Jews and subjugate the West. Never mind the very many victims of the vermin. No, their ‘hoooman rights’ have been “violated”.

Am I missing something? Has anyone seen them enter Afghanistan and Iraq, knock on the door of Osama ben Laden, Taliban and the Iranian mullahs and fight for the real rights of their many victims? Did they rock up to David Hicks’ bosom buddies and confront them over villagers tortured in caves? Have they stood up in the media and savaged muslims for such atrocities and demand Western Governments act with uncompromising force against such savage vermin?

That’s right, not once. It never entered their calculations to stand up to real torturers and mass murderers. It is plain why they won’t. It is plain why they aid some of the most sadistic, totalitarian butchers in history.

The Left regard the enemy as a useful ally to overthrow free countries. It is why Amnesty pressed for an ‘anti-torture convention’ and cheered when that cretinous moron Kevin Rudd signed it - to cripple the West’s capacity to fight a horrific, determined enemy. Amensty itself made this aim plainer than the sun at noon on a clear day.

The “bleeding hearts”, are anything but decent, stalwart defenders of freedom and the oppressed. The shocking truth is now coming out. Their own actions are showing the truth. Australia and our allies are engaged in a deadly war that must be won. This effort is being betrayed in naked acts of treachery by the Left, fully supported by the major media companies.

Thier treachery shows once again the real morality of the Left. They don’t a give stuff about the victims of Stalinist regimes. They freely lie upon their behalf. They have been doing the same of Muslim savages, and their many victims. Worse, in truth they have been activley assisting this ferocious enemy. It is treason.

One thing is already clear, we will see the death toll rise exponentially. The US Supreme Court ‘decision’ is one grave reason why. That, endangers modest Americans on home soil. A decision that betrays the brave men who captured the savages. A decision that entails a direct security risk. This alone is treachery, and it is due to the Left and the cowards who simply don’t stand up to them.

What Tim McCormack and The “Spencer Street Soviet” Age, Amnesty and Red Cross are celebrating is not justice and liberation of the oppressed. It is plain what they are celebrating; a victory that is genuinely criminal in war-time, an act of treason that gives considerable aid and comfort to a truly savage, ferocious, evil enemy. An act that puts the enemy back into action. But then, the diseased Left admires and lies for brutal savages and this renders more definite acts of treason no huge leap.

This is an addendum to the article, Bob Brown gave a candid speech in the Senate and Liberals failed to shred him for what he disclosed (Friday, May 16, 2008), posted immediately below.

Interpol has just released a report that only adds to the mountain of evidence against Chavez, whom Bob Brown fully supports. The report speaks for itself, so no further comment from me on it:

Computer Verified, Chavez Implicated

In the article posted below, an item on Obama concerning his embrace of our enemies was also cited. Here’s more evidence of Obama’s treachery.

Hitting A Nerve

Keep in clear view: Liberal MPs failed to shred Bob Brown. It is transparent why they put in another dismal, supine effort.

Senator Bob Brown, head honcho of the Australian arm of the KGB founded Greens Party, gave one of his more revealing speeches in Parliament, Wednesday, 14th of May. It is almost incredible that he can outshine his usual candour when it concerns what he really stands for but he managed it.

In the speech, he waxed lyrically about his recent holiday. Brown was a guest of someone he admires. Brown’s host is a narcotics kingpin, admirer and pal of Fidel Castro and that Stalinist regime, and financier of terrorists. He also outlined the Green’s manifesto for world totalitarian rule.

Liberal Senators failed to shred Bob Brown for what he had to say. The reasons for their usual dismal performance are why the likes of Kevin Rudd, Peter Garrett, and Bob Brown hold seats in Parliament. Instead, we shall do the work Liberal MP’s cannot do and it shall be spread out over several days - a pleasure must not be indulged in haste.

Bob’s host was Hugo Chavez. Yes, that monster. Brown admires him and you can tell he does from his sycophantic high praise of that financier of terrorists. Why does Brown like Chavez? Chavez supports the Greens. That’s right, according to Brown, Chavez has embraced the Green’s cause and treats its Stalinist members as his best mates. Reverse the relationship to uncover the reason Chavez embraces the Greens.

Wrong! It’s not because Chavez believes in their mystic rubbish. He is as Kyoto compliant as a flea obeying a dog’s request that it remove itself forthwith. This leaves only the Green’s real aims and their success in the West in realising them. Chavez hopes for the demolition of the West and it is no secret. He sees the Green’s putting in a jolly good effort to this end. Perhaps there is a medal in the post for Brown, Garrett and chums; the Order of Chavez, and wow, first class.

What more is wrong with Bob Brown’s adoration of Chavez? It has to do with what must be, to follow Brown, a trivial detail. Chavez funds enemies Australian soldiers are fighting in the Middle East. Yes, that is correct. Chavez not only funds communist terrorists in Latin America. Bob Brown is pals with someone who trains and funds very violent and savage enemy of Australia, Islamo-fascist terrorists.

Taken together with the violence he has committed against Venezuelans, his criminalisation of free speech, matched by control of the media, and much else besides, Chavez seems an odd choice of friend. Not to the Greens, as their Manifesto makes plain. He’s on their wavelength.

In praising Stalinist Chavez, Brown fits in, typically, excoriation of Howard, Downer, the United States and President George Bush. He reviled Howard and Downer for closing down the Australian embassy in Venezuela. I suppose his resentment is because they did not invite him to lunch and generally toady to him, cooing in his ear “what a nice shoe shine boy you are Bob.”

Brown called for the re-establishment of intimate relations with Chavez and his band of killers. Well, this is welcome news, for Islamo-fascists and drug pushers. Mothers, fathers, siblings, and grandparents watching loved ones perish from addiction to narcotics, enmeshed in crime, and mixed up with dangerous criminals until they are dead, must be thrilled with Brown’s good news.

These poor Australians can take consolation in the knowledge Chavez is a major producer of narcotics and is killing children and teenagers on the streets. So too, can our American friends find comfort in the knowledge that Chavez does this because, as Brown says, he really is a decent guy.

Funny, isn’t it, there were some in the US, UK, and Australia who held the same esteem for Adolf Hitler, until WWII broke out. Mind, treacherous leftists, fully backed by Union thugs, were content with Hitler right up until he invaded Russia. But, hey, Adolf was a Greeny too. Not in name, but as an ardent nature worshipper, who blew away massive amounts of capital on ‘alternative energy’ schemes - to the chagrin of businessmen and Generals.

Australian servicemen can take consolation in the knowledge Brown’s hero and new found pal funds the monsters they risk their lives fighting. Our American friends must be thrilled too at the prospect of taking high tea with someone who wants them massacred. Here’s an interesting comparison:

…the incredible ignorant statement by Obama that FDR and Truman talked to our enemies…

Iran is one enemy, al-Qaeda is another. Talking to AQ is akin to madness and treason…

But there it is, in black and white, the evidence that this man would sit down with those who deserve no sit-downs.

[Obama:] “The other side can label and name-call all they want, but I trust the American people to recognize that it’s not surrender to end the war in Iraq so that we can rebuild our military and go after al Qaeda’s leaders. I trust the American people to understand that it’s not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but our enemies – like Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did.”

Obama wants to have meetings without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has publicly spoken of his desire to annihilate a key ally of the US, as well as Hugo Chavez, Raul Castro, and any number of thugs and tyrants. When did FDR, Truman, and Kennedy do that? Answer: never…

I really have to inform my Jewish friends, who survived the Holocaust, what big-hearted humanitarians Bob Brown and his new pal, Chavez, are. I presume they will be as chuffed as I am. Chavez is decent, for he is concerned for the welfare of our enemies. Preparing islamo fascists to massacre Jews is a considerate, charitable, awfully civil act. These kind gestures have touched me. I’m weeping, for all those who have been butchered by them and their backers - Chavez.

ASIO and the Federal Police must be chuffed at the prospect too. Saner heads might surmise they have enough on their hands dealing with the agents of other regimes, including Kevin Rudd’s ‘mastahs’ in Peking. They will enjoy their irritations exacerbated by Chavez’s agents running around Australia encouraging terrorist cells, treacherous leftists, and delivering diplomatic packets to drug pushers in the streets to pay for all this diplomatic goodwill.

What of the reciprocal? Oz diplomats serve in a wide range of countries with nasty regimes. Why spoil a bad thing by adding another called Venezuela? The strong impression is, many diplomats are rather keen on shutting down rat-holes, permanently.

To show what a lovely dictator Chavez is, here is some sound reading matter:

Olavo de Carvalho, South America’s resurgent left is a threat to liberty , also on Carvalho’ site, on this page.

Even Wikipedia cannot competely ignore the truth about Chavez and his regime, as its item sets out here.

Eric Driggs, South America: Carbon Copying Cuban Tyranny. (This article contains a bibliography, some linked, of analytical papers and newspaper articles lifting out matters that the reveal the brutality of the Chavez Regime.)

While Brown lauds Chavez, and marvels at how lucky the Venezuelans are to be under his jackboots, there are those who have an uppity view of paradise. There have been large demonstrations in Caracas, against Chavez. Chavez doesn’t mind. They are Chavez’s excuse for a bit of fun - putting down his uppity slaves with ruthless, murderous violence.

Living in Chavez’s holiday inn, Brown obviously didn’t have time for glum faces. Why ruin a fun holiday when he could smile along with Chavez. Chavez calls any Venezuelans who oppose him traitors, and deals with them accordingly.

No Liberal MP stood up and slammed Brown for his admiration of Chavez and his recommendations. None stood up to ensure it went down on the record why Howard cut diplomatic ties with Chavez and his band of totalitarian, drug peddling, terrorist supporting thugs. Not one of them.

Brown is not of fit and proper character to hold a seat in Parliament. Is his position on Chavez just reason to boot Brown out of Parliament for the disgusting, treacherous, totalitarian fanatic that he is?

Choice selections from Brown’s masterful speech in “Continued”.
(Continued)