Mangled Thoughts

Mr. David Brown delivers these blows:

Rebutal No.2:  “you should check the history of latin america. american backed puppets like pinochet, batita, samoza ran miltary dictaorships that murdered and tortured routinely. they learnt how to torture at the school of the americas training facility in america. latin america is a much better place than it was”

No.3:  “monckton is not a scientist. his opinions on the subject are worthless. any attacks aimed at him are due to his collsal abilty to tell porkies eg he won the nobel peace prize? that he is an actual maths expert and that he influenced thatcher. she is a keen advocate of climate change”

Before responding, it is pertinent to note:

Mr. Brown’s beloved Marx

When I first read many years ago Marx’s The German Ideology, I was instantly struck by the sheer brutality and violence he expressed. This was the instant reaction to the very first page! And, it is a constant through out the book. The question this begged occurred to me straight away: How on earth could he have been published and taken seriously? The reaction and the question remains.

It is that bad, I feel ashamed that it sits in my library. It is like a great crime. Yet, it sits there, buried in a dark corner and obscured by worthy books, including those documenting the true record of socialists because, sadly, it does have to be referred to now and again. We will do this. I will retrieve it from its concealed place of dishonour.

During next week, I will begin posting quotes from the book, one a week, to demonstrate for all those who have not read it, Karl Marx did reveal himself before the world what an ugly, nasty and violent little man, he truly was. Like attracts like, and his indeed faithful followers were all the same, from Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin, to Che Gueverra, Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez in Latin America.

Response to Mr. David Brown

It is a summation of notes from sources, including Broookesnews, as well as primary material. What I have noted is only a tiny drop in an ocean of evidence. Indeed, what is remarkable about Mr. Jackson of Brookesnews is not only the depth of his learning in economics and economic history - as also Dr. Frank Shostak, but also the depth of his reading in the real, true history of socialist regimes and fronts.

It is work the Right-wing cliques and their think tanks, Quadrant magazine, HR Nicholls Society, CIS and the Institute for Public Affairs never do. There is only one conclusion, and it is the truth, to be drawn. It is of no value to them. They see nothing in it for them. They see nothing in it for them in rebutting those such as Mr. David Brown. Thus they leave the hard Left and their cultist acolytes unchallenged, and the public unarmed.

It is why fifth columnists in the media get away with lying on behalf of butchers such as Saddam Hussein and Fidel Castro and smearing good men, including President George Bush and Prime Minister John Howard. The motive for their treachery is singular. It is to undermine the capitalist West from within. Smearing the stalwart and telling lies about history and current events is essential for this vile aim.

All this, the Right-wing clique has ensured passes. This is another matter of shame accredited to the account of the likes of Des Moore, Ray Evans and the rest of them. They are voids in this too. Donors don’t see what is wrong with this, paying Quadrant magazine, CIS and Institute for Public Affairs to do this work also and they do not do it? Donors pay for nothing?

The editor’s of Brookesnews policy is clear: They will not let it pass. The policy of Mangled Thoughts is the same.

So:

The leftwing accusations against the Defence Department’s Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (formerly the School of the Americas at Ft. Benning, Georgia) are outrageous fabrications. Not a single leftist has been able to substantiate them. About 20 years ago the school’s so-called “torture manuals” were leaked.

One contained the following sadistic advice that warned the interrogator not to “be rude, or impolite…make fun of the interrogee…Lose his temper…Use profane language…[or] Argue.”

The same lying leftists who defamed the school are the same vicious scum who support the murderous Castro and worship the sadistic Guevara.  (For a taste of life as one of Castro’s political prisoner read Armando Valladares’ horrifying Against All Hope: The Prison Memoirs, a horrendous tale of murder and torture in a socialist paradise.)

Pinochet never received US support. Furthermore, he overthrew a Marxist thug who violated Chile’s constitution and then tried to turn the country into a Latin American Gulag along the line of Castro’s Cuba. As for Samoza, the Sandinistas tortured and murdered vastly more people than the Samoza family ever did. (The Black Book of Communism, pp. 665-75.)

Regardless of US errors (which the left are always exaggerating) in Latin America they are insignificant when compared to the crimes of leftwing dictators, crimes that you – being the good little indoctrinated lefty that you are refuse to condemn.

You condemn Monckton for not being a scientist. Did you think I wouldn’t notice that you didn’t condemn all those global warming fanatics, particularly in the media, who, unlike Monckton, are scientific illiterates? More and more scientists are now condemning this green fraud. For example, permit me to refer you to the renowned Professor Pat Michaels and Professor Richard Lindzen.

Having received emails asking whether yes or no, the answer is:

You’re damned right I am.

Clauswitz wrote on the art of war.

The Right wrote: The Art of Backstabbing.  Chapter one is their manual on, How to advance to the rear.

Some readers have expressed doubts as to how much damage the Right have inflicted on the genuine Liberal cause. That officials in the ACTU and affiliates, the ALP, hard Left journalists, academics and, well rather very many of them call the Right clowns and buffoons should be suggestive. There are analytical papers for internal purposes examining the Right and their nostrums that have been fixed in the public eye as the genuine free market case and so on. It sounds odd but it is true, they publish them over the Internet.

One such paper will be used in another item. Keeping in view that it is a serious, analytical paper, the author freely uses expressions such as,”they are clowns”. It’s available on the Internet!

A union online news magazine has a riot of a time. Try this, for instance, keeping in view it is only one example out of countless examples in a magazine widely read by Australians:

It’s time to welcome back into the Tool Shed a truly unique individual, Des Moore Worker’s Online

The item is one of their tame pieces. Those guys do know how to let rip. Hmmm… the writer must have had an off-colour day when he penned that. Notice something else:

Online is written for the modest man. It’s stand is the concern for the modest man. It voices anger over things the modest man can be righteously angry about. It doesn’t hide, it goes out and confronts their targets out in the open and they can eviscerate them publicly because the Right have no principles, no spine, no guts and no passion to stand up for anything.

One look at the magazine and it spells fighting stuff, effectiveness and punch. Turn to the IPA, CIS, HR Nicholls Society, Quadrant and, they are sterile, no first principles, no passion, contempt for the modest man and they are all about themselves.

The clique is a closed bubble. One upshot of this is, they are always in ‘disequilibrium’. There is no feedback mechanism and thus they always spin out of control. Berg and IPA falsify history, attributing it to Muslims, Quadrant pulls a stunt worthy of diseased Leftists and Janet Albrechtsen.

The Left should have been smashed and minced decades ago. The hard Left cannot be defeated until the Clique is pulverised first.

Dead right it’s a campaign.

Thus Mr Finn MLC (Liberal Party) commenced his speech against the “euthanasia” Bill. It was given an orwellian name:

Medical Treatment (Physician Assisted Dying) Bill 2008

State ordered killing is not only medical treatment but the finest expression of the Hippocratic oath! Many doctors took exception and wrote strongly worded protests to MsP against the Bill.

The Bill was defeated last week (10/9/08) 25 to 12. A comprehensive defeat, but it was a far closer run thing than the raw numbers suggest.

One of the blobs the scrofulous Right have jobbed into Liberal Party seats, Mr. David Davis, explained the next morning that the bill had not been drafted properly. He continued that if it were sent to the ‘Law Reform Commission’ (code for jackbooted thugs but this is entirely lost upon Davis) and rectified by these Kommissars, it would be passed.

Yes, it wasn’t merely a rumour, a Bill for State ordered killing was put before the Victorian Parliament. The reason why is clear enough. Examined properly it is cognate to the “Abortion Bill”. The former was raised as a ‘private member’s Bill’. It was raised, unsurprisingly by a Party of diseased Leftists, the Greens, through one Colleen Hartland MLC.

It was also totalitarian in scope for good measure, as the Orwellian abuse of language reinforces and entrenches. Consider, for example:

Section 9: No . duty to assist – A doctor is not under any duty to provide assistance under this Act but must inform the sufferer that other doctors may be willing to provide assistance. A doctor who fails to do so is guilty of an offence. Penalty – 5 penalty units

Clause 9(1): doctors who decline to provide assistance under the Bill ‘must tell the sufferer that other doctors may be willing to provide assistance’

clause 9(2): health care providers who do not provide assistance under the Bill must, on request, transfer a full copy of the patient’s relevant medical records to the new health care provider

Section 10: professional organizations and associations must not apply prejudicial pressure or penalties for things done by someone lawfully under the Bill. (The restraint also applies to health care providers, but not to providers that do not permit their facilities or associations to provide assistance under the Bill.)

Non-victimisation – Provides that a professional organisations or associations must not censure or discipline or subject to other penalty or loss, a person who assists or refuses to assist a sufferer end their life.

The expansion of clause 10 is, “prejudicial pressure or penalties for things done by someone lawfully under the Bill.”

clause 11: no-one may try to resuscitate a person who takes a drug to end his or her life pursuant to the Bill

If it had been passed, it would be a criminal offence for doctors and nurses in any hospital to refuse to aid in the killing of anyone recommended for killing (and this is the force, the selection of defenceless individuals for state ordered killing). Contrary to what those who drafted the Bill, and those who supported it in Parliament claim, doctors and nurses in being compelled to recommend those who are willing to execute State ordered killings would be by naked Government compelled to aid and abet what would be shocking crimes ordered by the administration of Brackistan.

Now this is what we have in in the Bracks-Brumby abortion Bill, state ordered killing of the defenceless, but in the womb. That is what it is, sucxking the brains out of babies, trying to poison them and if they do not die in the womb, as is done in other countries, they are strangled or cast aside to die slowly. It also has an Orwellian title:

Abortion Law Reform Bill 2008

Again, this Bill if it is passed makes it a criminal offence for doctors and nurses to refuse aiding and abetting state ordered killing of babies. Clause 8 spells this out:

“Obligation to refer woman despite conscientious objection of practitioner

“Imposes a referral obligation on registered health practitioners who have a conscientious objection to abortion. A health practitioner must refer the woman to another registered health practitioner who the practitioner knows does not have a conscientious objection to abortion.

“Obligation to perform or assist in emergency abortions to preserve life of pregnant woman despite conscientious objection of practitioner or nurse

“Notwithstanding a conscientious objection, a registered medical practitioner is under a duty to perform an abortion, and a registered nurse is under a duty to assist in the performance of an abortion in an emergency where the abortion is necessary to preserve the life of the pregnant woman.”

Observe this chilling section:

9]. Repeals section 10 of the Act dealing with the offence of child destruction.

Notes: 1. Section 10 of the Crimes Act 1958 provides –

Offence of child destruction

(1) Any person who, with intent to destroy the life of a child capable of being born alive, by any wilful act unlawfully causes such child to die before it has an existence independent of its mother shall be guilty of the indictable offence of child destruction, and shall be liable on conviction thereof to level 4 imprisonment (15 years maximum).

(2) For the purposes of this section evidence that a woman had at any material time been pregnant for a period of twenty-eight weeks or more shall be prima facie proof that she was at that time pregnant of a child capable of being born alive.

Rule of (Common) Law overthrown
For the umpteenth time, in clause 11:

“Rule of common law abolished
New section 66 formally abolishes any rule of common law creating an offence in relation to procuring a woman’s miscarriage”

This is is only one more bit of hard evidence : the increasing lawless of the Executive, and in this case with murderous intent.

When is a baby not a baby but a fetus and a fetus a baby?

The answer is whether it will be killed. If it is to be killed, then it’s a fetus. This is another monstrous abuse of lanaguage but these are the sort of expressions which the boosters use to justify the move towards state coerced killing of the unborn. Here is a chilling instance:

Twiddling the radio tuner Sunday evening stopped at an exchange between Dr Sally Cockburn who also goes under the vile nom de plume, Dr Feelgood. She and her ‘panel’, which included Kommissar of “Health” Beth Wilson. Wilson is a lawyer (surprise, surprise). Her Monash University PR blurb discloses her career has been one long burden to long suffering Victorian taxpayers. They are pro state ordered killing. Cockburn once compared abortion to removing haemorrhoids. During their shallow ‘discussion’, they interchange fetus and abortion depending on whether a baby is to be killed or not.

“Cockburn…says when someone comes to her surgery with a lump on the bum she…”

One of the ‘panel’ declared, ‘more babies survive today than in the past.’ Her point was, abortion reflects nothing more than mortalioty rates in vitro. Hang on a sec:

Entrepreneurs invented the first great life-saver, disinfectant. This resulted in a great reduction deaths. They then resolved how to supply new medical procdures and how to deliver them at increasingly lower prices (contrast socialist schemes such as Medicare which is very costly as the growing, long waiting lists for surgey telling reflects). Free markets and entreprenuers overcame what was a devestating blight in the past. Now we have dumbkopfs saying, ‘bring on the good old days through state ordered murder’!

Anti-Bill of Rights

It came as a shock to learn it was the Kennett Administration prepared the anti-Bill of Rights. The timing of this Bill indicates the Kennett Administration might also have prepared the Blasphemy ‘Act’. This is all on top of what they did with the STO and OPA.

While state ordered killing is an aim of the diseased Left, they have made major inroads only because of the myopic, statist Right, and thier defective economics. The grounds of the rule of common law is property rights and free economic action. It is out of these real rights are generated and thus the dignity and freedom and life of the individual is advanced. The Right haven’t failed badly on these grave matters. They are a massive intellectual and moral failure.

What has occurred in Victoria has been extensive inroads into real rights, with the upshot:

The STO and OPA is engaged in systematic larceny.
Larceny to prop up alternative energy ’scams’, and desalination plant (instead of genuine free market massive dams on rivers)
Billions squandered on Sports and entertainments

And the real Rights of Victorians ground under the feet of Statist morons and thugs. And this bleak comedy is played out in the two Bills. Under the anti-Bill of Rights, so long as a Bill meshes with that pack of elastic garbage, it’s ok and that is what is to be found in these two Bill, state ordered murder is ok becaase it can be meshed with the anti-Bill of Rights. Notice also:

By appeal to that bog paper, the anti-Bill of Rights, politicians absolve themselve of culpability for the genuinely criminal overthrow of real rights and any malevolent scheme they dream up. “It was me, it was the Bill of Rights that made me do it that’s wot”, and this the tenor of the sentimental rubbish spewed out by all behind those Bills for state ordered killing. They remain culpable.

It must not be ignpored, under the abortion ‘Bill’, it is a crime for any doctor and nurse to refuse to do as the administration dictates.

The abortion bill has been passed in the Lower House but is yet to be put to the Upper House. Under this Bill, doctors and nurses face automatic prosecution if they do not do as the slobs in Spring Street dictate, and this Bill recieved support from some of the Blobs.

The Bills are cognate. It is no accident at all that they were introduced and debated roughly simultaneously. Little dictatorial parasites enrich themselves while having effectively reduced Victoria to a one party State, and only a few short steps from outright absolutism. For good measure, to ensure the complete debauchment of Victorians, they gaily render it also a charnal house.

The best the camotose Right can do is bleat like Mary’s bloody little lamb. Well, lamb belongs on barbecues, in ovens, and in frying pans for a tasty gnosh up. Meanwhile “Red” Ted Baillieu and Michael Kroger continue to strip the Party of anyone who could be merely accused of holding genuine Liberal Principles. Just to check, here is Komrade Ted in action, purifying the Party:

RED TED: Leader’s office shrieks “Death to America” in between faction fights

While their clunker tanks, the HR Nicholls Society, the Institute of Public Affairs, and the Centre for Independent Studies continue to fatten themselves at taxpayers expense and at the expense of Liberal Party members. More lamb to be roasted.

This, as a running subject, is now tagged Charnal house.

Andrew Landeryou has disclosed this interesting bit of news:

“COURAGEOUS: MP’s career on the line as Labor’s Left faction subverts conscience vote with abortion decree

Labor’s Socialist Left faction in Victoria has issued a directive to all of its state members of Parliament that they must vote in favour of the bill decriminalising abortion regardless of their personal views.

Their move is seen by ALP insiders as a repudiation of the government’s approach that the bill be decided as a “conscience vote”.”

It comes as no surprise, and the reason why it has come to this is straightforward too:

The truth is the bill should not have even been contemplated. What will follow this, if passed, will be ‘euthanasia’, the extension of state sanctioned killing of those still in the womb to the defenceless; the aged, the handicapped, and why not those with grave diseases?

It is, moreover, state sanctioned killing which will eventually lead to state ordered killing. Now what do we see? This was stated on radio a couple of weeks ago:

“If the Bill is passed, the next step will be to steer an ‘euthanasia bill’ through the Victorian Parliament.”

Deadlier, as we have had cause to note, the Rudd administration is looking to the backdoor route, the States’ Parliaments, to achieve this, as related in:

Rudd Cabinet is pressing for State sanctioned killing, euphemistically called euthanasia

I fail to see how High Court Judges could rule the NT euthanasia act was lawful. When is state sanctioned killing, apart from death penalties for dangerous criminals and thus an entirely different matter, lawful? ‘Regulation’ and ‘legalisation’ of any matter is not the rule of law. They are an attack on the rule of law.

How could the High Court even consider State sanctioned killing is lawful. Indeed, how can it consider those responsible for that ‘Act’ as law abiding, decent Australians because this is what the diseased cretins in the NT Parliament are not?

Now what Catholic in name Steve Bracks prepared and now Brumby is pressing, their ‘abortion bill’, is State sanctioned killingt of babies. This is exactly what it is, the killing of fully developed babies, of individuals. To reinforce this crucial point, I’ve just listened to an American woman on the radio.

She survived an attempt to kill her in late term. What is worse, she has investigated late term abortions in America, and the findings are truly appalling. How does this sound? Babies finished off by strangulation. Others thrown aside to finish dying. Here is the punch line, she is not the only survivor of attempted state sanctioned killing of the unborn. She related there is a surprisingly large number of survivors.

Common law is the rule of law, and it is generated out of its grounds, absolute property rights. From this, free economic action, and it is these real rights that are grounds of the rule of law. This also means the individual. It is these real rights that are being overthrown.

Brackistan is already a one Party State, as the article article on the condition of the Victorian Liberal Party puts beyond question, Liberal Party News: The Victorian Division is stone dead (1/9/08). Brackistan is far down the road to absolutism, as the sheer number of “Acts” that overthrow real rights shows. In this respect, the Bill of anti-Rights is a mere formalisation of what is the case. Now we have the Rudd fascist Cabinet on top heading down the same road.

The treacherous Left are fond of telling the lie the Nazi regime and its mass murder progroms were generated out of Germany’s “Right”. Entirely false; it was a Leftist movement. Secondly, the Nazis did not invent euthanasia and eugenics.

The rise of National Socialism was the culmination of some 60 years of sliding down that road, commencing with Bismarck’s Statist policies. Bismarck believed his approach would defeat socialism. He was not only wrong; his policies prepared the way for absolutism.

On the Nazi progrom, readers might refer back to this, and linked articles:

Hard Left Fronts advocate legalised murder of children

As for the Nazis’ mass extermination of the defenceless, T4, this site summarises what they did:

Shoah education

The cults of nature, with the equation of animals with man, and nation were central to the descent into what was nothing less than a progrom in mass murder of the defenceless. The roots of these cults are in pseudo-philoposphy during the 17 to the 19th century. Over the same trends in theology, the Lutheran Church split mid 19th century. Some Lutherans, so disturbed by the developments, left Germany forever. They migrated to Australia.

Classical liberals, including theologians, were smeared not simply by the hard Left but also by the Right. They were accused of being naive simpletons. There was, though, a problem.

Many of them lacked the bulwark required to defeat central planning and the diseased Left. That is, sound, free market economics. How remarkable, today’s Australian Right are void in this crucial armoury. Unlike the German Classical Liberals, these guys have no excuse what-so-ever for their appalling defection.

“Bismarck believed his approach would defeat socialism…”

It is also what Australia’s ignorant “Right” have done over a couple of decades. Now that they are in Opposition, States’ and Federal Parliaments, they are still at it. Neither can their strong authoritarian, statist inclinations be ignored. They are ably supported in all this by the buffoons in the Centre for Independent Studies, The Institute of Public Affairs, and the HR Nicholls Society.

The sheer damage these three plunker tanks of cranks alone have caused is incalculable. Where’s the good Professor Sinclair Davidson’s explanation? Readers eagerly await his account of why all the damage that they have caused and continue to wreak is good for Australians. Davidson can’t be a coward?

What the abortion bill and the push for euthanasia in both Brackistan and now by the Rudd administration is, is not only state sanctioned killing of the defenceless. It is also a major assault on the freedom and dignity of all Australians. An assault involving the deliberate debauchment of Australians, and to make modest Australians as culpable as they are for this shocking, disgusting descent.

Oh, yes, deception is involved in the lie that ir has the support of the modest man in the street. The tactics used that led to the Nazi progroms are the same as those used today. A persistent whittling away at the defences of the man in the street, combined with ensuring opponents were smeared and not heard, to the extent it was possible prior to 1933.

The Innoculated “Right’s” response

“Red” Ted Baillieu and the “blobbies” see nothing wrong with the ‘abortion’ bill. The “Rightwing” kerplunker tanks, as is their daily routine, are dead in their plush graveyards. It is not that they are merely incompetent in economics and defending free markets. They have no moral compass whatsoever. The Centre for Independent Studies lobbying for the destruction of Australians through Co2 taxation is another obscene indication of this.

Here we are witnessing the diseased, treacherous Left about to gain another major victory against Australians and it is all due to the venal, narcissistic, unprincipled cowards who are the ‘Right’ and are not the genuine Liberal Party of not only Victorian but also Australia wide. If these clowns had not seized control of the Liberal Party, and real talent had been promoted as MPs and advisers, the Left would not be where it is today, they would have been dead and buried long ago. Needless to say, there would be no pushes for monstrous measures.

The truth is, modest Australians loathe the left. Victorians make plain daily that they despise Bracks and Brumby and their diseased Leftist, absolutist creature called Brackistan. However, when they look at what is to the fore in the name of the Liberal Party, they see nothing better than a pack of insular clods muttering village idiot-like noises, “foine, foine, foine… can I have a lolly now?”, and give the thumbs up to increasingly naked absolutist measures. Victorians and Australians are in great peril because of this lot. Victoria and Australia are at risk of being reduced to another charnal house built out of ‘credentialled’ state ordered murder.

NB.

Media commentators have it completely wrong. Of diseased Leftists in the media the reason why is obvious. The point to observe is:

It is completely false the notion that the matter is a debate over “pro-choice” versus “pro-life”. This false stress is part of the hard Left’s weaponry used to break down resistance. This is the gambit of diseased Lefitsts, contrary to Mr. Derryn Hinch.

Hinch for example, is “pro-choice”. Recently, however, he did admit on radio that abortion “is the deliberate killing of the unborn”. Hinch is shallow, because if he worked through what follows from the admission, he would not be using 3AW as platform to boost the abortion bill. He would be vociferously attacking it.

What is crucial about the above? Hinch’s audience is the man in the street, whom the venal necrotic “Right” hold in contempt. Hinch should examine why Andrew Landeryou’s sites are a favourite of the man in the Street, and thus why the diseased Left are pushing to have his sites shut down.

Hinch is eminently qualified to be a ‘gun’ in the HR Nicholls Society, the Institute of Public Affairs, and the Centre for Independent Studies.