What do China and Australia have in common?
Ordinary Liberal Party members are appalled at the obvious and what has their back up is, it didn’t happen overnight, nor in the last two years. What chills them all the more is that they know full well that the Right is as much responsible for it as the Left. It is the culmination of years of ‘policies’. Yet, it is not Liberal Party members only who are drawing the conclusion. It increasingly litters the daily conversation of the man in the street.
The answer, ladies and gentlemen, as brutal as it might seem, is fascism. For good measure, amusingly Victoria is almost what China also is, a one Party State, and the Victorian Right, whether ‘wets’ or ‘dries’ - the distinction is a mere quibble turning on their hubris, is also responsible for this. Apart from Victoria, the general question is, where is Australia’s Right in all this, fascism, and it’s rhetorical only. Let’s lay the case out per a swift demonstration:
The case of Peter Spencer
New South Wales farmer, Peter Spencer, is fighting for his property rights. What this turns on is, all property owners in Australia own their property in name only, but pay for the expense of their upkeep. It is politicians and bureaucrats and the voting blocks they buy with the fraud and deception who realise what is crucial to inalienable property rights:
Owner’s
- enjoyment of their property
- use of their property
- development of property, in the case of Peter Spencer’s property, that means land he had developed into valuable agricultural and fishery land
- last, but not least, sale of property.
In sum, freedom of disposal of property is inseparable from inalienable property rights. The one is intrinsic to the other.
Politicians of both major Parties and bureaucrats have seized the former, for their own benefit and for the benefit of the ‘voting blocks’ they toady too. And, the Right crawls and toadies as much as the ALP does to those diseased, lying, Chavez hugging, treacherous, primitive creeps the Greens. I shall repost on Bob Brown’s and the Greens’ and other hard Leftists’ full support for the totalitarian, drug king-pin, Hugo Chavez and his gang of butchers. And the failure of the Right to deal forthrightly with them and what Brown laid out in Parliament.
Inalienable property rights are the foundation of free markets and this means the foundation of prosperity and freedom. It’s the very basis on which people everywhere have lifted themselves and their families out of the gutters, out of misery and into happiness. It is written in history, but we have a direct window into this, the work of Grameen Bank in Bangladesh and it’s founder, Muhammad Yunus.
Having remarked before on the wonderful transformation wrought by this bank, the pertinent point is Yunus’ “micro-credit” didn’t simply finance vast numbers of formerly destitute Bangladeshis into their own start-up enterprises and their expansion. Many, bye the bye, were once effectively bound to old tribal chieftains. It freed them to acquire property and this drives business expansion, and issued into rapid capital accumulation. It liberated them from bondage. This transformed their lives in two ways that are inseparable:
1. The obvious, prosperity, in their own life-time, with-in a single generation. Their children, until Grameem Bank, faced the same life of hard labour, mired in appalling destitution as their parents once endured. It’s reflected in good food on the table they could not have had in the past, nice homes they never could have aspired to before, buying medical services, appliances, schools and universities for their children.
Has anyone heard of mass deaths from tidal waves in the bay in recent years, at least with the frequency that blighted their lives in the past? No, of course not. The reason is straight-forward; they not only own nice, well-built, comfortable homes, they own land in superior locations, that’s why.
2. They are free, they have gained real liberty. Their new inalienable property rights has freed them, and extended their freedoms. I detest those who say wealth ‘doesn’t buy happiness’. It does, just ask all those Bangladeshis who are now very, very happy.
It is important to note that Yunus worked very hard to convince the Government that law must be rooted in economic freedom and, this means inalienable property rights, because it was crucial if the aim of Grameen Bank, to transform not a few but millions of lives, was to succeed. He succeeded with the politicians and the evidence is written in happiness. Bangladesh thrives and what does the rest of the world do? Since Bangladesh is no longer a cot-case, but a vibrant demonstration of the truth of free market economics, it is ignored - as an inconvenient fact.
Grameen Bank is imitated in Eastern Europe with the same tremendous success.
Freedom of disposal of property is intrinsic to inalienable property rights
What the politicians and bureaucrats, in concert with Greens fronts have done is not formally stolen property but have effectively done so by ‘regulation’. Thus they have stolen not only from farmers but also-from every Australian (except, of course, themselves) by asserting that they only and not owners can dispose of property. This is what they have done, the Right and the Left, and their advisers.
In case anyone in a city is unsure of this try, for example, merely cutting down a tree in your backyard and see what happens to you. You are allowed to give effect only to how local councils and states’ governments wish to enjoy your house and land. I am aware of some brave types who have defied local councils and state governments and these examples show the ‘Acts’ are hollow but this is not the point to such ‘Acts’. Those who have rammed them down rely on two facts:
1. Millions of Australians are law-abiding and respect authority.
2. Intimidation and fear. Who wants to face the real police state thuggery Cabinets assert through such Acts, and it’s no joke. The police state powers wielded by States’ and Federal Cabinets are real and extensive. Lawlessness in the form of violent, naked coercion backed by goon squad enforcers are real threats to be wielded against Australians who refuse to comply with what is dictated to them.
Now for Mr. Spencer again, beginning with a joke:
Two farmers in1930’s Germany:
Hans: What’s the difference between National Socialism and Communism, I’m confused.
Carl: Hans, Hans, my friend, it’s simple. Under communism, the State keeps your cows. You milk them and drink all that your scraggy cow produces before they get their hands on it.
Carl: Under fascism, you keep the cow, the State milks it and drinks the milk from the mangy beast. Hans, Hans… where are you going?
Hans: I’m going to shoot the cow. Under communism, it’s clear now, a farmer gets to drink all the milk until the day they shoot him. Under fascism, I keep the cow, the gauleiter can throw me in prison if I don’t keep it how they want it kept and hand over specified production. So, I reckon I’ll go to jail for committing what is a crime according to them, killing Heidi. Carl, the bastards will go right round the bend when they find a fly-eaten carcass. It’s alright, though, the joke’s on them: I’ll drink milk in prison.
In not only Mr. Spencer’s case, but of all farmers around Australia, the excuse for what is nothing less than property theft on a tremendous scale has been the cult of environmentalism and expressed in regulation. It must not be forgotten that, for example, Malcolm Fraser also blitzed the way with large-scale land grabs, declaring vast tracts of forests as “heritage wilderness”. The latest twist is just that, another twist committed by the perverted sitting in parliaments, ‘carbon capture’ to excuse the indefensible.
Regulation is not rule of law; it is the overthrow of the rule of common law, which is grounded in inalienable property rights and so free markets. It is no accident that both Right-wing politicians, including Peter Costello, and Leftist politicians assert regulation is the rule of law. They are doing nothing less than attempting to convince the two are identical. Repeating a lie often does not make it true, and it is nice to see the lying bastards in the East Anglia University will be dealt with on the wrong end of trials in courts for this very reason.
A distinguished law lord made it very plain what regulation is and what it is not. Lord Mansfield’s 1772 judgement:
The state of slavery is of such a nature, that it is incapable of being introduced on any reasons, moral or political; but only positive law, which preserves its force long after the reasons, occasion, and time itself from whence it was created, is erased from memory: it’s so odious, that nothing can be suffered to support it, but positive law.
In Victoria, Steve Bracks, John Brumby, Rod Hulls and local councils proceeded from imposing restrictions on land clearance and usage, to outright criminalisation of any activity on property they do not like, eg. clearing highly volatile scrub and trees are major crimes for which the punishment is fines and prison terms. This was not merely unopposed by Victoria’s Right, they supported it in the Parliament. Another instance, Bracks’ ‘Green belt’ through Melbourne and outlying areas.
For many in this ‘green belt’, their property was also their superannuation ‘policy’, from market gardeners, other types of firms, to home owners who had planned to split large blocks later in life to pay for their retirement. Any proposed change in land use must be submitted in a report to the Orwellian ‘Department of Enviornment’ and, if approved, the owner must pay a fee, and, should it be approved, the minimum fee is $50,000 and this for a slight, trivial alteration in usage only.
Under Commonwealth and NWS regulations Right-wing and Leftist politicians effectively stole Mr. Spencer’s and all other farmers’ rights progressively, and progressively forced Mr. Spencer and others to shut down agricultural production on their properties in a matter of a decade or so. Their farms are now, as Mr. Spencer’s is, valueless, worthless. Mr. Spencer, as are others, is left with land reverting to savage jungle and another load of fuel for more ferocious, more life-destroying bush-fires.
Victorian and NSW farmers also watched politicians and bureaucrats further steal property rights for their own expense free pleasure by making it a criminal offence to build water storage capacity on their farms.It is clear what that lot in the name of their cult expect modest Australians to do.
All of the above committed by the Left and the Right and not paying their many victims one cent of compensation. The likes of Mr. Spencer own their properties in name only, and have to pay for the upkeep and the only beneficiaries of this are politicians, bureaucrats and greens and other diseased Leftists.
And to make sure there is no room for doubt on this, three Right-wing minsters are directly guilty of these criminal actions against Australians, Ian Campbell, David Kemp and Malcolm Turnbull as successive Ministers for the Federal Department of Environment. But first, Mr. Spencer supplies a quote from none other than Pulitzer Prize winning jurist, Peter Costello.
Mr Peter Costello on the ABC 7.30 report on the 6th of June 2007 said
“Let me come back to the point earlier, that because we stopped land clearing, some how that shouldn’t be counted. Actually, stopping land clearing was a good thing…
“Yeah well, its- that‘s – but this was all designed to stop land clearing and we stopped land clearing, and its helped us meet our Kyoto target.”
The lie, man causes ‘global warming’, and the Kyoto fraud are only recent developments in what is a long record of politicians and bureaucrats using Federal and States’ Parliaments to create the impression their actions are lawful.
Mr. Spencer recorded a damning quote. This what Mr. Ian Campbell, when Minister for the Environment, said:
Campbell:
…you’ve got, you know, a lot of the natural heritage of Australia is held on private lands, on farms and pastoral leases, stations as we call them, and so the main people who look after this natural heritage are in fact the farmers… so very important that they’re on board and don’t feel like some heavy-handed Government based in Perth is trampling on their property rights.
Bingo! And, that expression, ‘don’t feel like…’ Here’s a quick and honest solution - dope farmers and their families, or shoot them outright. Either way, they won’t ‘feel’ a thing again.
That’s what private property means to the Right and the Left. Sodding little bastards called Australians expecting to prosper and enjoy real freedom are a blight on the landscape (as are factories). The serfs should be grateful to be allowed the privilege of stumping up tremendous sums to buy property and ensure their masters enjoy these pleasure parks. This is the great advance made by parasites such as Campbell, Kemp, Turnbull, Garrett, Brown, Penny Wong, Tony Abbott, Greg Hunt, Helen Kroger, Peter Costello and Kevin Rudd.
Though, at least Campbell had the decency to say:
So you’ve got to have the farmers working with you and that’s the Commonwealth’s approach, is there should be fair compensation paid when you take away peoples’ property rights…(My stress).
Yes, readers, Campbell and Cabinet fully knew what they were committing, and so did Peter Costello and they still know what they did to Australians.
Moreover, they were using coercion to cut food production through the ethanol scam, and this while they were also effectively confiscating vast tracts of land and shutting, coercing the shutdown of more food production.
These treacherous slobs had the nerve to attack the Rudd Cabinet for using taxpayers to buy a property to shut it down (it’s in Hansard). It is criminal the deliberate economic arson of a property but in this case the owners were paid, except every other little oaf risibly called an Australian had to pay for this one more green, destructive fantasy. They, the Right had the hide to whine about it when they are responsible for much that is far worse, commencing with measures that has ended in Mr. Spencer taking his stand. The right should never use the word proportion again, nor level ‘hypocrite’ against anyone.
The fact is, despite Ian Campbell’s, and Peter Costello’s best efforts to exculpate themselves and pass it off as ’sound policy’, there is no compensation for the real theft of property rights and, what is more, the fascist measures by which they effected it. But we don’t have to refer to the regimes of Hitler and Mussolini to illuminate this. China today provides chilling examples of what it means - a living window into the force of the actions of the Right and the Left:
What Australia and China have in common
No ifs or buts, the situation is the same:
1) There are no inalienable property rights in China.
2) The fascist pin of these despicable actions is one and the same in both countries.
Both the Right and the Left together, over decades have been engaged in overthrowing inaliebale property rights in Australia. The Red Party gerontocracy must have a good, long laugh at the clowns in Canberra, daily. A very nasty, continuing case demonstrates the point rather well, and there is a further irony in it, what is happening is compounded and driven by the Green’s policies of Western politicians.
Rare earths have a wide range of uses. Keith Bradsher in, Earth-Friendly Elements, Mined Destructively (25/12/09, The New York Times) relates the alternative energy scams set up by western politicians has entailed an explosivel increase in demand for them that has, naturally, induced sky-rocketing prices. It might be mused, therefore, Australia’s politicians are also directly responsible for the economic impact this has for their use as inputs in genuine market driven production. The regime compounded this with export quotas, which it cut by 12%.
These elements come almost entirely from China, from some of the most environmentally damaging mines in the country, in an industry dominated by criminal gangs…
Miners scrape off the topsoil and shovel golden-flecked clay into dirt pits, using acids to extract the rare earths. The acids ultimately wash into streams and rivers, destroying rice paddies and fish farms and tainting water supplies.
On a recent rainy afternoon, Zeng Guohui, a 41-year-old laborer, walked to an abandoned mine where he used to shovel ore, and pointed out still-barren expanses of dirt and mud. The mine exhausted the local deposit of heavy rare earths in three years, but a decade after the mine closed, no one has tried to revive the downstream rice fields.
Small mines producing heavy rare earths like dysprosium and terbium still operate on nearby hills…
“There are constant protests because it damages the farmland — people are always demanding compensation,” Mr. Zeng said.
Green fraud aside, the kernel of the problem described, the destruction of agriculture and crude, destructive mining techniques, is that there are no property rights in China. Neither farmers nor sound mining companies have them, nor does anyone else in China. So, neither farmers nor mining companies have a basis for fighting the crime gangs destroying property by asserting inalienable property rights. Crime gangs aside, consider it:
With inalienable property rights, anyone can enforce their rights, should a neighbour use their property in such a way as to cause damage on the other’s property. A Judge, in his conclusions, will order the culprit to make good the damage they caused to the other and cease actions causing damage. Take, for example, Victoria and the firestorms of February this year, and those still waiting to be triggered.
All the firestorms were in government ‘owned’ forests. They don’t work them, they don’t clear them, they do nothing. If anyone else kept such large swathes of land like that, neighbours could sue, certainly when firestorms erupt and also press criminal charges, including murder. This is apart from also the proliferation of feral animals in those pleasure parks, including feral dogs that destroy farmers’ capital - live-stock.
So, why are politicians and bureaucrats exempt from at least criminal charges when it is their ‘policies’ that caused the firestorms and destroyed tremendous amounts of property and murdered so many Victorians? Make no mistake, the actions of all guilty of this horror were deliberate. They imposed the’policies’, the Right and the Left. They did this to Victorians.
There is, in truth, no good reason why the whole damned lot of them should not be rammed before stiff in common law judges and tried on every criminal charge and on top of prison terms, have their properties seized and handed over to their many victims. No, seriously, readers, this is what should be done! It’s not a joke; they are rotten criminals who killed Victorians, no-one else did what they did.
Since sound mining companies do not have property rights in China, they cannot establish them in new prospective mines. Since farmers have no inalienable property rights, they cannot work with sound mining companies, and profit as a result while maintaining their farmland. The field is clear for the crime gangs, encouraged by soaring prices and the stupidity and brutality of politicians in China and in the West.
Near destitute farmers are now more than merely worse off. Brutalised and facing a very bleak future is the politest way to sum up their position. All due to the fascist, anti-inalienable property rights position of the regime. On the other hand, inalienable property rights would spell the end of that terrifying regime. Two other incidents reinforce the point;
1. In preparing for that fascist exercise in squander and nationalistic hubris, the Olympic Games, the regime simply closed down factories in Peking, fiat. Never mind the investors and employees. To sanitise Peking, to make Peking look Greenie friendly to the spivs in Europe and on the Olympics ‘committee’.
2. The recent jail term handed down to a former Communist party official for daring to consider how to end the one Party state.
It was as good as loading those unfortunates into a skip and throwing them on a garbage dump as so much rubbish. This drew praise from theOlympic Games spivs - what a ‘wonderful effort by the regime in cleaning up Peking, helping to make it a cleaner, greener, future’.
Orwell got in first, pigs spew vomit and expect the slaves to lap it up. And it was vile. Modest Chinese, whose priority is to do the best they can for themselves and their families, taxed to pay for a two weeks orgy, were rendered destitute so that parasites could feel happy and developmentally arrested juveniles could sweat and grunt in 2 weeks of exhibitionism, to win piffling baubles and, in the case of many - crossing their fingers, be made wealthy ‘career sportsmen and women’.
Well, well, surprise, surprise! What do we see but the Right and the Left have been doing exactly the same to Australians, and not in the last few years. They have been at it over decades and Mr. Spencer has drawn attention to this fact.
And there’s a sign of fascism, the cult of ‘National Sport’,
Local councillors and States’ and Federal governments seizing private property by the $billions and throwing it at ‘elite sports’. Rubbing salt into injury, they call it investment and have spawned a new army of parasites who expect sodding real taxpayers to keep them in the ‘lifestyles’ they expect as of right. You know, those sodding little elves sweating away in factories, mines, and farms to earn a living, only to see their earnings swiped off them by lying, juvenile bastards pretending to be adults. Stalin would also approve, he was a keen ‘patron’ of ‘elite sport’ in, of course, the ‘national interest’.
The message a genuine Liberal Party would give them is: “You want to star, or run a sport. Do it in your own bloody backyard, you big fat tosser.’
Peter Costello avowed fascist aims in a candid radio interview
During an interview on Melbourne radio station 3AW, Neil Mitchell asked Peter Costello:
“But, taxpayers’ money; it’s their property, right?”
Costello was about to firmly answer yes, then checked himself:
“In a way it is…”
That answer is the genuine Costello. The force of his answer is plain enough, what politicians and their enforcer the ATO do not take is, they assert, a grant made by them to sodding Australians.
The sheer amount of police state ‘laws’ that Costello alone is responsible for, through the ATO, is an indictment of the world’s greatest economist. I tracked some of them that filled volumes each, and yet they were but a tiny fraction of what Costello rammed down on Australians. My mistake, he didn’t push them through Parliament; this would credit him with what he is devoid of, energy and intelligence.
He rubber stamped them. He agreed ‘in principle’. There was nothing more to do except bang his head down into an inked stamp pad and affix his signature authorising the establishment of another goon squad, then stand up in Parliament and assert, to the unexpressed pleasure of the diseased Left, it is good ‘LAW’. No doubt every damned treacherous Leftist celebrated hard each new gift Costello, the boy wonder, handed them. I wonder who the moron was who passed him - forget University, out of prep school - because that criminal should be shot.
A reader attempted a cheap put down when some years ago one pointed out that taxpayers under the regulations are treated as criminals, guilty of what are novel crimes, and have to prove themselves innocent 365 days a year. All one will say to that clever dick is, try telling that to all those who know what the real force of the ‘tax code’ is and, as I remarked earlier this year, Rudd and Swann intensified them again to ensure many more Australians know where they really stand.
Yes, Peter Costello, as Treasurer, intensified and extended violent, naked coercion, backed by goon squad enforcers, as real, intimidatory threats to be wielded against Australians who refuse to comply with what is dictated to them. Peter Costello has the hide to consider himself a fine, up-standing Liberal and Australian, and so do the rest of the mendacious Right. I’m here to remind the Right, their guru is a true and fitting representative of them all in all their qualities.
Indeed, Costello, with his hunch back-attachment, Michael Kroger, is the Right personified. No wonder his brother, Tim, is Jesus Karl Marx Christ. They are exact mirrors to each other. Yes, Costello is the Right perfected and magnified. I’m here to remind Costello of what he really was as Treasurer, a fascist thug.
Through regulation, politicians and bureaucrats have succeeded in re-arranging their position. They are much too, too important to be mere public servants, with taxpayers as their masters. No, they are the masters of Australians and the latter are slaves, the proper order of things. It’s understandable that the Swiss are despised in Australia too.
Regulation is rooted in the myth of perfect competition, and it is at once also a direct attack on inalienable property rights, for this is exactly what is also involved in ‘anti-cartel laws’, which Costello proudly intensified. The Right are committed to the myth and in this, have done splendidly in discrediting the sound, therefore highly moral free market cause in the eyes of many voters. The truth of free market economics is an inconvenient fact that must be eradicated according to that lot, another thing they hold in common with the treacherous Left. It is why the Right’s single line of attack is to claim they are better ‘economic mangers’ and berate the left for incompetence.
Watching them and their think tanks, IPA, CIS and HR Nicholls Society, smear and slander genuine free market economists while they rammed down anti-free market policies under Liberal States’ and Federal Cabinets is a real insight into what perverted, vicious bastards the Right truly is. All this before considering, for example, what they did with the STO in Victoria during the Kennett years, and the IPA and CIS are really nervous about what I have reported to date on it. They are not looking forward to what I will further disclose, as numbers of their inmates have made plain on this site in comments. The IPA and the CIS were the Kennett-Stockdale Cabinet’s economic advisers.
But, the Right and the Left have promoted the cult of environmentalism, because, as the Spencer case demonstrates, they have latched on to it as an excuse to effect fascist plans overtly and rapidly.
The case of Mr. Spencer summed up
Mr. Spencer is fighting for his inalienable property rights, and for compensation for the economic carnage the Right and the Left, and bureaucrats, police state thugs more like, have caused him and his family. Mr. Spencer’s fight is now a general fight, as all landowners now realise that this is what is at stake, and that they are also entitled to just compensation for the damage that has been inflcited on them. It is to be noted, those who are in increasing large numbers joining Mr. Spencer, realise the crimes have not been committerd by ALP Cabinets only. They have correctly identified the Right as also culpable of these lawless actions.
The hard Left dissemble they reflect the values of those who stood at Eureka Stockade. Bullshit they do. It is guys such as Mr. Spencer who do. Indeed, how long before we do see outright, wide defiance of the tax regimes of local councils, States’ Governments and the Federal Goverment? Carbon taxation has crystallised a few hard truths for very many Australians, all those little voters the Right as well as the hard Left despise.
One important force of Common Law is to protect Australians’ property rights against Cabinets straying down the ‘regulatory’ path. It is no wonder that the Right and the Left, bureaucrats, and sundry ‘academics’ in law, run the spin in the media that regulation is the rule of common law. They have every motive to try to brainwash Australians into believing that lawlessness and thuggery committed by political parties in Parliament and by bureaucrats is decent and, importantly, lawful. Why, the Nazi Party and its squads, the Gestapo were scrupulous to a fault, were meticulous in ensuring all that they did was legal too.They were ‘morally superior’ to the Communist regime in this respect.
No one can question the veracity of both Right-wing and Leftist Cabinets in this respect- Federal, States’, Local Councils, in ensuring that all their actions are legal and why not. They only wrote the bloody rules - as did the Nazi regime. Indeed, much time in Senate ‘debate’ on bills is prudence manifested. They are all concerned to ensure the legality of all articles, clauses and sub-sections of any Bill they ram down.
Their concern is understandable, reflected in a curious pre-occupation. They are all concerned to discover how easily a measure might be challenged in common law and, consequently, whether they could be had up on criminal charges. It’s not a joke, readers. Their lines of ‘questions’ and ‘answers’ are dominated by these two telling questions. Moreover, amendments are introduced when it is found their backsides are fully exposed.
Oh, yes, Left, Right, Upside Down, and Inside out, it doesn’t matter what Party. They are all concerned to ensure they won’t have their heads rammed down a sewer for one reason: they bloody do well know that most of their ‘Acts’ are unlawful. They do know full well what they have perpetrated against Australians, and continue to perpetrate. It’s in Hansard, in black and white.
That they know their actions are not lawful is disclosed in such telling quotes as those included above by Campbell and Costello, and also, ALP heavies in attacking Senator Barnaby Joyce, who for once has got something right:
Barnaby Joyce attacked over land-use claim (18/12/2009, The Australian).
Franklin has got it wrong, in his opening remark -
The government yesterday savaged the opposition finance spokesman as unfit for office after he backed the case of a hunger striker demanding $100 billion in taxpayer compensation for farmers for lost land-clearing rights.
The elimination of freedom to maintain and work land, which is what ‘land clearance is’, nothing more, is rooted in what has been done, the aim of the Right and the Left to seize property rights for their own benefit, and make property owners pay for it. The slimey response of Rudd’s “Finance Minister” was diversion:
The government yesterday savaged the opposition finance spokesman as unfit for office after he backed the case of a hunger striker demanding $100 billion in taxpayer compensation for farmers for lost land-clearing rights.
Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner also demanded the opposition explain how scrapping land-use laws would affect Tony Abbott’s promise to address climate change through direct action on land use.
The Opposition Leader “must come out today and confirm if this is opposition policy or just another erratic thought bubble”, Mr Tanner said.
This, from a Minster of a Cabinet that has plundered thousands of billions of dollars to indulge in a grotesque spending spree. Tanner continued:
“Mr Abbott and Senator Joyce must explain the cost impact their new compensation policy will have on their direct action climate change policy and exactly how they are going to use taxpayer funds to pay for it.”
Those who are victims are entitled to compensation full stop.
Cut to the chase, Mr. Tanner, it is the force of what compensation rests on that disturbs the Left and many in the Right. To ram this home, before taxpayers are touched for one cent of compensation, all those responsible for these fascist, lawless schemes, and all those who are beneficiaries must be ordered to pay part of the compensation out of their own assests first, then taxpayers making up the difference.
There is a problem, the sheer scale involved, and I don’t mean the numbers required to compensate only farmers. What about every Australian who suffers the same problem. It is the exposure, in law, of the deception and criminal action of parasites in Local Councils, States’ Governments, and the Federal Governments, and their predecessors that scares these lying bastards shitless.
What Mr. Barnaby Joyce needs to do, but stubbornly refuses to, is turn to sound free market economics and seek those who can advise him. This is where Joyce falls down. It is not simply property rights that have to be fought for. It is the fact that property rights is the pin of free markets and so freedom, and the anti-inalienable property rights ‘policies’ of both Parties are fascist that demands solid, robust preparation. It requires sound free market economics to fight this and where it counts, out in the open and on the only battle ground that counts, with the modest voter.
Here is Kevin Rudd’s Green Cult guru and also a Pultizer jurist and yes, as Costello, another spoilt brat whose degree is law:
Environment Minister Peter Garrett also weighed in, saying land-use controls had existed for many years and had been put in place by state governments. He said: “The question for Mr Abbott is: does he support Senator Joyce’s new policy initiative?”
Garrett’s reasoning is thus: If Cabinets get away with lawlessness for a number of years, then it is lawful.
But, the legalese eagle is making a fine point, the right sort of criminal lawlessness committed by Cabinets and enforced by police state goon squads, as defined by, well, them. Now, if the Right were in Office, it would be lawful; what would be wrong are mere adminstrative details. This is what the garbage by that retarded, developmentally arrested, wealthy, ignorant, dummy sucking brat amounts to. And, he’s right, for that is the “Right’s” notion of ‘principled opposition’.
But there it is, Tanner himself has confessed the fascist force of this effective coup de tat against Australians - Australians own property in name only. They must keep them as ordered by their masters in Local Councils, States’ Parliaments and Federal Parliament. They must also pay any extra levies these parasites demand for the privilege of being allowed to keep their land. In return, accept destitution and, the truth of the matter, accept what is all too bluntly evident- the now fast slide into absolutism. And, this is what Rudd’s grand plan to ram down carbon taxes, and ‘remake the Australian economy’ will complete if passed, and so would Abbott’s version. This is central planning with naked totalitarian force. Stalin and Mao tried and look what happened. The response of the Right? Exactly.
Oh, but for two things:
- They paved the way for the horror times ahead. Now we end up with Tony Abbott who only called for central planning to be rammed down in his manifesto. The funny thing is, this is what the Rudd Cabinet is doing.
Oh, I see, Abbott’s objection is that it’s Rudd and not him who get’s the glory and praise for this wheeze. I understand, sympathise with the poor old boxing boof-head, he had to knife Turnbull, who also wanted to do the same thing to Australians and it’s Rudd who will win the great mad mullah prize. Oh, by the way, the one time hero of the Liberal Party, John Elliott, sees nothing really wrong in all this - his disagreement is, it should be Turnbull and not Abbott leading the Liberal Party and Australians down the Shining Path to death. He’s as brilliant as Michael Kroger.
- The slide is unmistakable. It is a slide from Statism, to fascism, to outright totalitarianism. The right are directly responsible for this as much as the Left. And, so too are the IPA and CIS, and the clowns in the HR Nicholls Society in which that anti-Liberal half-wit, Peter Costello, is the star ‘economist’. The really hilarious thing in what is otherwise a chilling fact is, the Right don’t have a clue that they are directly culpable. The hard, treacherous Left, however, know they are, which is why they laugh at the Right, and call them clowns and buffoons.
Make no mistake, readers, what is now at stake is not only prosperity for millions of modest Australians. Now freedom is at stake. It’s taken decades to reach this pass, and all Australians can thank the navel-gazing, ignorant, anti-intellectual Right and their selfish, arrogant ‘think tankers’ the CIS, IPA, HR Nicholls Society.
It is silly to pretend millions of modest Australians support hard Left policies and aims. They hate the hard left and their aims. The Right has betrayed them to the treacherous Left and this is the hard, unvarnished truth of the matter.
If there had been genuine Liberal talent in the Liberal Party, backed by solid, gutsy genuine free market economists, the Left would have been smashed decades ago. The Greens, a spastic ugly little mongrel of a puppy-dog, would have been killed at birth. The threat of absolutism would not have emerged. And, bonus! Millions of modest Australians would also be far wealtheir than they are, for there would have been no policies that have hampered and crippled and wiped out investment in Australia, from regulation to the larcenous ‘monetary policies’ of the RBA.
No, instead, the great achievement of the Right and their think tanks is their success in bringing about a fascist regime.
Mr. Spencer and the many who have joined him are fighting for their inalienable property rights, and for compensation for the economic carnage the Right and the Left, and bureaucrats, police state thugs more like, have caused him and his family. What they might not realise is, they are the meat in the sandwich.
The fact that their plight is due to fascist policies points this up. Fighting through the courts alone, Mr. Spencer has realised, won’t work. But, the fight is against a hard Left ideology and neither Mr. Spencer nor his allies are intellectually equipped for this fight. Unless this, in fact, ‘war’ is fought accurately and hard, the reason for Mr. Spencer’s plight won’t be rectified, and all Australians, not only farmers, remain in great danger.
Open Challenge to Senator Barnaby Joyce
Yes, Mr. Barnaby Joyce, you ignore (genuine free market) economic laws at great peril. The perils are being realised. So, Mr. Barnaby Joyce, why do you stubbornly persist in refusing to hear out alternative sources who can lay out vital truths - not for your pleasure and whim, but so that you can do the job you claim to be doing, serving Australians the only way an MP can, from sound principle, reinforced with spine?
Like it or not, Mr. Joyce, without sound advice, you can cause great damage to this cause unless you seek out sources equipped with what you are bereft in, and worse, you are also blind to why this is so crucial. You will fail not only Mr. Spencer. You will fail all Australians in a matter that is grave and of great impact, inalienable property rights. As it is, Mr. Joyce, your stance on the ACCC, and your refusal to work through why ‘anti-cartel laws’ are in fact highly destructive and ruinous for Australians also undercuts much ground you need to hold if you are to succeed in this fight, every other fight, and the war that must be won.
The ‘Dead Right’
The Right has not merely betrayed them, Spencer and all farmers, and all decent Australians. They have sold them all out to the hard Left. The Right has never fought the Left, but then to do this requires what the Right are devoid of, sound principles and the spine to act on them and standing by those principles when they were in office. No, instead, the Right imposed on the Liberal Party venal fifth rate hacks who see nothing wrong with Statist and fascist ‘policies’. Decades of the Dead Right has lead to Rudd.
The Right does not give a stuff about Australians and Australia. They only fight for themselves, for ego inflating media publicity, and for their bank accounts. Gentle readers, I advise you not to get between the likes of Ray Evans, Des Moore, and the inmates of the IPA and a media camera.
So, they threw up the likes of Michael Kroger, Peter Costello, David Kemp. The other reason is, the Right are anti-intellectual, and it shows in the tripe put out by their ‘think tanks’ the IPA, CIS and HR Nicholls Society. These cretins, Kroger, Costello, and David Kemp, are what the Right call talent.
Slobs, who see nothing wrong with policies that ruin firms and Australians, and nothing wrong with ‘circumventing’ inalienable property rights. Come to it, I’ve never once heard nor seen Costello fight against Greens’ policies that destroy production and immiserate many. To the contrary, as Treasurer he sacked Australians to set up more Green frauds such as the ethanol scam. But then, why shouldn’t he have enjoyed loose living when he regards property, including pay packets and firms’ earnings and capital, as the private property of politicians.
Peter Costello is opposed to genuine Liberal principles
No better evidence exists than his actions as Treasurer.
Peter Costello, Hero of the Liberal Party - what a bloody nasty lie that is, but then the Right believe smelly, modest Australians really do love them. Why, when a Toorak Doctor’s Greenie-hugging wife smiles the whole world smiles with her and, heck, the likes of Hugh Morgan, who puckered up for the camera that loved him, know they have the same impact.
Fascism
We can do no better than quote von Mises, Planned Chaos, who in that singular polemical tract smashed the hard Left.
“Fascism was not, as its advocates boasted, an original product of the Italian mind. It began with a split in the ranks of Marxian socialism… Its economic program was borrowed from German non-Marxian socialism and its aggressiveness was likewise copied from Germans, the Alldeutsche or Pan-German forerunners of the Nazis. Its conduct of government affairs was a replica of Lenin’s dictatorship. Corporativism, its much advertised ideological adornment, was of British origin. The only home-grown ingredient of Fascism was the theatrical style of its processions, shows and festivals.”
Corporativo is being advanced by the Rudd Cabinet, through extensive plans and it is not only Co2 taxes that they are preparing to ram down.
Zwangswirtschaft
(Nazi economic policy, 1930’s.)
“…seemingly and nominally, maintains private ownership of the means of production, entrepreneurship, and market exchange. So-called entrepreneurs do the buying and selling, pay the workers, contract debts and pay interest and amortization. But they are no longer entrepreneurs. In Nazi Germany they were called shop managers or Betriebsführer. The government tells these seeming entrepreneurs what and how to produce, at what prices and from whom to buy, at what prices and to whom to sell. The government decrees at what wages laborers should work, and to whom and under what terms the capitalists should entrust their funds. Market exchange is but a sham. As all prices, wages and interest rates are fixed by the authority, they are prices, wages and interest rates in appearance only; in fact they are merely quantitative terms in the authoritarian orders determining each citizen’s income, consumption and standard of living. The authority, not the consumers, directs production. The central board of production management is supreme; all citizens are nothing else but civil servants. This is socialism with the outward appearance of capitalism. Some labels of the capitalistic market economy are retained, but they signify here something entirely different from what they mean in the market economy….
“The Nazi plan was more comprehensive and… pernicious than that of the Marxians. It aimed at abolishing laissez-faire not only in the production of material goods, but no less in the production of men. The Führer was not only the general manager of all industries; he was also the general manager of the breeding-farm intent upon rearing superior men and eliminating inferior stock. A grandiose scheme of eugenics was to be put into effect according to “scientific” principles.”
“The slogan…[for their] their economic philosophy… Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz (i.e., the commonweal ranks above private profit)… [is also] the idea underlying the American New Deal and the Soviet management of economic affairs. It implies that profit-seeking business harms the vital interests of the immense majority, and that it is the sacred duty of popular government to prevent the emergence of profits by public control of production and distribution.”
In Australia, the term used by the decrepit “Right” and the diseased Left is neither “the majority”, nor “the collective”. They chose an infantile substitute to say the same thing, “the community”, which stretches, expands, deflates, and shrinks according to what the wheeze is.
Community rhymes with the sound cows make,
“Commoooooooooooonity”
This gels nicely with the resurrection of the cult of nature and the slogan proudly shouted by cretinous MPs busy blowing up the Liberal Party, “We are all beasts”.
They want to give the coup de grace to liberalism and capitalism; they want to overcome immoral egoism by altruism; they plan to replace the anarchic democracy by order and organization, the society of classes by the total state, the market economy by socialism. Their war is not a war for territorial expansion, for loot and hegemony like the imperialistic wars of the past, but a holy crusade for a better world to live in. And they feel certain of their victory because they are convinced that they are borne by the wave of the future.
Just as “Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini constantly proclaimed that they were chosen by destiny to bring salvation to this world”, against economic liberty, so did both the French and the Germans on the road to WWI. The same false morality is to be observed of the U.N. and boosters of that monstrous body, and the E.U. And also of the likes ofTurnbull, Greg Hunt, Abbott wrote it in his manifesto, and it litters the speech of Rudd and Wong.
I remind readers of the couple who were children in 1930’s in Britain. They were shocked into silence as they listened to Kevin Rudd. They said he sounds like Hitler, that listening to Rudd is like hearing Hitler’s national socialist slogans all over again. This, from a couple who hitherto had never compared anyone to Hitler. They were in tears. The more I listen to Rudd, I have to say, I can only conclude that they are dead right, for the couple drew attention to expressions that littered Hitler’s speeches in the 1930’s that also litter Rudd’s:
“We the nation will overcome…”
“We will build a new future…”
“Together, we the people will build the nation…”
“We need to make these sacrifices for the sake of our children…”
Rudd is also fond of stressing, “I am your Prime Minister… your leader…”
That elderly couple wept because Rudd refreshed memories that are best left well buried.
Let’s get this right:
A Prime Minister is merely the 1st minister among equals in Cabinet. Nothing more, and not a bloody Reichsfuhrer.
Well, we can all thank the Right for an Australian Reichsfuhrer, a little, over-promoted, ignorant, feeble little slob who might be Catholic in name, but not in confessional substance, for his position is also virulently anti-Christian and anti-Catholic in particular. Rudd seems tough only because he shows a very nasty character; he violently abuses those who are not in a position to deal back what he deserves. Fancy that, a gutless, schoolyard bully as Reichsfuhrer Prime Minister of Austral Department of the Greater World Soviet Union the U.N. Australia.
Thanks very much, the Right - wreckers of the Liberal Party, for your treacherous betrayal of principles, the genuine Liberal Party, and Australians to the hard, diseased left. What a fine achievement these parasites have recorded - a fascist regime. Mind, it’s a fitting tomb for Peter Costello’s reputation as an economic genius.
I implore any MP who has any principle left in them to forget them-self and for once in their parasitical life do the right thing by Australians. Yes, you too, Mr. Barnaby Joyce. There is not much time left. But, act! And, for once, drop the arrogance and turn to those who can advise you soundly, and I do include Mr. Gerard Jackson of Brookesnews and Dr. Frank Shostak as two gentlemen you need to hear.
‘Happy New Year’, rings hollow. I’d sooner eat soap coated in salt than utter what will show out a very nasty lie.