It was syndicated by the Right under the Kennett-Stockdale Cabinets. I’m certainly not saying Kennett and Stockdale deliberately, knowingly, did this. It was their arrogance, rooted in their anti-intellectualism that propelled them, but this does not excuse what they and their Cabinets and their advisers are responsible for. The IPA and CIS were their, ha, economic advisers.

The rationale was the lousy, anti-free market economic nostrums  of the Right and their ‘think tanks’. This fuelled what was not free market reform at all. Privatisation was how to punish Victorians by filching more money out of them - privatisation of former government monopolies, instead of establishing them as genuine free market entities that genuinely serve customers (monopolies exist only if governments impose them). This, bye the bye, is another instance of how the Right discredited the thoroughly sound, therefore highly moral cause of free markets where it counts, the modest voting Australian.. They went further:

They decided crucial institutions that are not businesses could be privatised too, and this is what they did with the STO-OPA and enforced through VCAT. This is how they turned the STO-OPA into a crime syndicate enforced by the Kafkaqesque show trial courts of VCAT. Bracks and Brumby intensified the legalese to ensure Victorians could not fight back. Indeed, Jennifer and Peter were the last couple to win a major victory before a measure came into force soon after that crucial victory that would have made their action in fact a criminal offence.

Justice and inalienable rights in Victoria - rubbish - just lawless, criminally lawless politicians and their goons. Victoria, the totalitarian crime state. It really is appalling - each time I hear the name STO and OPA and VCAT, my reaction is I’d just like to reach out and rip their heads off, and the heads of those responsible for this vicious crime syndicate.

Mind, the Right and their advisers in their ‘think tanks’ are running scared over this, for jolly good reason. Justice means that they with Bracks and Brumby Cabinets would be rammed through the courts on grave criminal charges and this is no joke. They know this, they certainly do because of the detailed articles I have already published on these shocking matters. Before introducing any more fresh material, here-in we simply give the links to the articles so that those unfamiliar with these horrendous affairs can apprise themselves with the hard, bloody, brutal facts.

To repeat, what makes the case of Peter and Jennifer unique is that they are one of the few victims to not only have fought back and won - and there are more subsequent developments on the horizon in their case. Peter is the only one who has fully documented a case over what is now 5 to 6, long, hard years. I’m not saying he managed to extract all evidence but what he managed to extract is extensive, highly detailed, and sufficient to launch criminal investigations into all parties culpable for these crimes against Victorians and raise serious criminal charges, including ramming VCAT “Judges” through the wrong end of stiff in common law cross-examinations in genuine courts of law and seeing all involved in it up to their necks rammed down into the sewers where they also belong.

Over the last few weeks more cases have come to light, and now Mr.Richard Ferguson has raised his in comments. Mr. Ferguson, I’ve been trying my best, in my way, to help fight and see justice done. Needless to say, the gutless vultures in the Right try to pretend it’s all make believe.

Their oath-sworn MPs refuse to do their duty to uphold inalienable rights of victims in Parliament. We have one such parasitical, dishonourable, sponging, idle Right-wing MP stone cold dead on this. Then, why would David Davis MP act when it means his Right-wing mates and their advisers would also be strung up - despicable.

Mr.  Richard Ferguson’s statement is in comments to:

Victorian Government, : Office of Public Advocate caught red handed in commission of major crimes: perverting the course of justice.

Here is his statement:

Michael Beresford-Smith lies to VCAT. He said to me and my Grandmother that he would enquire if services were available to assist me to care for my Grandmother at home.

At the VCAT hearing he says he instructed me to develop a Care Plan for my Grandmother within 2 weeks. He denied saying that he would enquire if services were available. He then said to VCAT that my Grandmother was placed in a Nursing home because I did not develop a Care Plan within the 2 weeks. Michael Beresford-Smith never mentioned anything to me or my Grandmother about me having to develop any Care Plan prior to the VCAT hearing on the 4th of Jan 2009. My Grandmother is devastated that she has been placed in a Nursing Home against her will. I believe the mental anguish caused to my Grandmother by Michael Beresford-Smith will greatly shorten her life.

Another chilling case. Through Peter and Jennifer, I appreciate what it is like though, naturally not the full misery victims are put through.

As for Mr. Beresford Smith, he’s a very nasty piece of work, who is also a central figure in the case of Jennifer. Some of his thuggery is related in the above item.  We have not simply the Left but also the Right to thank for the likes of him and there are very many of them, and why he gets away with it. Also all the ‘law’ firms that have sprung up to aid the Victorian Cabinet enforce their totalitarian, anti-inalienable rights measures against not a few Victorians. There are very many Victorians who are victims.

Let’s be clear on this: the objective of the crime syndicate is to seize and strip the property of Victorians, cash them in and hand the stolen proceeds to the Treasurer and Cabinet. That’s right. The scale is great. It is difficult to gain a true estimate of how many victims and how much has been stolen to date, because of the sheer scale of it. It would take a thorough criminal investigation to establish the full extent of what has been perpetrated and is still being perpetrated against Victorians and even then, it’s doubtful if all would be uncovered.

Here is the coverage of the case of Jennifer and Peter in chronological order, and Mr. Ferguson, I hope that what is documented might provide some insight to aid you in your fight, and I advise that extract every document you can and carefully archive them, your notes, and any other evidentiary note. Secondly, keep a running, chronoligical diary of all that transpires and relate each piece of evidence to any entry they pertain to and these are only the elementary steps needed to fight:

The Government of Victoria (Brackistan) is operating a large-scale criminal operation: Pt.1

[Initially, I assumed it had been set up by the Bracks-Brumby Cabinet and their advisers. Later, as readers will learn in subsequent items,I was corrected. First hand, inside sources, also shocked by it all, explained that it was the Kennett- Stockdale Cabinet and their advisers and how they did it. What Bracks and Brumby did was to continue and intensify it. This does not discount that the Cain and Kirner Cabinets might also have been stealing private property of those who placed their affairs under the STO, but it was the Right who converted it into an overt crime operation, using, of course, ‘regulation’.]

Documented evidence for ‘Phase I’ of: Victorian Government’s criminal operation and State Trustees Office, and accomplices, and other parties.

The Office of the Public Advocate uses an even broader ‘catch–all’ definition with which to trap VictoriansVictorian Government has eliminated the inalienable rights of some Victorians

Victorian Government, : Office of Public Advocate caught red handed in commission of major crimes: perverting the course of justice.

The Right established a large-scale criminal operation in Victoria.

What is the response of the Right? one of their number gave their game away - butt protection, theirs. This is covered in an open reply to one of their number:

Open reply to a spineless apologist, Mr. Steve Edwards, for the Right

What needs to be also kept in clear view is that the whole criminal operation is known in every law and accounting firm in Victoria, which is entirely understandable. It is also known in every real estate firm because they have to execute STO orders to sell up homes and land of the victims they have swiped property off. The STO-OPA crime syndicate is the worst kept secret in Victoria, but nothing is done about it and we know why - So, Mr. Edwards, go blub to your mommy, you pathetic excuse for a man.

Robert Doyle was a typical Right-wing MP in Spring Street, a disaster. He supported all the anti-alienable rights measures of Bracks and Brumby, as did the rest of them. As mayor, he’s showing out not only a disaster, but also a buffoon and hero to those cultists the Greens and the rest of the Hard Left. The Liberal Party and Victorians can thank Michael Kroger.

It seems, however, he is not merely a disaster and a buffoon. It’s troubling, though,  to contemplate he could so easily have been in the Turnbull and Abbott Shadow Cabinets if he were a Federal MP. Consider the likes of Scott Ryan, Greg Hunt, Helen Kroger, to name a few MPs from Victoria - and the Kroger Krony Party owns every Victorian seat in Canberra and we shall unload damning material on Greg Hunt’s antics under Turnball again.

I believed we had the mark of the ‘man’ when as leader of the Opposition, Doyle didn’t merely fail to defend the inalienable property Rights of Victorians, but with the rest of what occupies what should be Liberal Party seats, fully supported every measure by Bracks, Brumby and Hulls to usurp and steal them. I was wrong - not about his intelligence - I can never be accused of insulting the Right by calling them intelligent, no fear.

He not only didn’t defend inalienable property rights, he has strong, shall we say, authoritarian inclinations, as he explained once on radio. His position is ‘positive law’. Being as dense as the rest of them, it has not occurred to him at all that it is wrong and why it is wrong.  I’d over-estimated him.

Arrogance adds, according to the Right, a certain charm and flair. Abbott calling for central planning, or watching Julie Bishop struggling cross-eyed with a proposition with a degree of difficulty less than 1 is charming too, though why the sensation is closer to being terrified is a mystery. Robert “Paper Doyley” Doyle has done the Right proud in two schemes he has cooked up to immiserate Melbournians and best of all, they are not novel. Declaring hard Left aims as his policies also smacks of plagiarism and here they are:

1. Doyle orders Melbourne’s Co2 net emissions be cut to zero

He declared (Lord Mayor Robert Doyle calls halt to city’s sprawl, Herald Sun).

Just ponder what that really means. This is preceded by other statements, including this article by the Lord Nag of Melbourne, for The Age, aka “The Spencer Street Soviet”:

The climate change battle starts at home

The salvationist ‘vision’ of protean dictators shines through his article. Mid harangue he injected this comment:

I recognise there is a significant number of people who would call themselves climate change sceptics; who do not accept or are not persuaded by the greenhouse gas/global warming arguments.

I do not propose further argument to “convince” climate change sceptics of my position.

Funny that, Doyle has never debated anything. Like the rest of the Right, he merely asserts, and everyone else should obey. Does it occur to him that it is up to him and his fellow green cultists to defend their a-scientific and a-economic cultic tripe claims and  not scientists and genuine free market economists, who have set out impregnable criticism of their claims. More so, because it’s not an intellectual exercise only.

Doyle, and his fellow thugs on the Council are playing games with the lives and prosperity of Melbournains and this also sums up the antics of the developmentally arrested Right and their think tanks the CIS, IPA and H.R. Nicholls Society.

Don’t be daft, nothing ever cautioning occurs in his and their skulls.

So, Mr. Doyle, His Naginess, wants additional police state powers to compel business and residential property owners to make very expensive alterations to buildings, what he euphemistically calls ‘retro-fitting’ buildings. As a bribe to break down resistance, he wants to tax them again and hand back the proceeds to ’subsidise’ some of it and he calls this ’seed money’. It is nothing less than another carbon tax, but this is not all.

Doyle and the Council are criminally insane, as one of their reports on the plan demonstrates, Zero net Emissions by 2020. For residential premises, for example (page.8):

An emission reduction target of 149 kt CO2-e on 2020 business-as-usual emissions has been set across the residential sector. This represents an increase of six per cent on 2005–06 levels and a 20 per cent decrease on
2020 business-as-usual emissions as shown in Executive summary Figure 2. This will be achieved by focusing on the largest sources  of emissions that can be reduced for the least cost, specifically:
• space and water heating (approximately 12,000 households)
• common areas in high-rise developments (75 per cent of all high-rise developments, or a total of 24,507 dwellings)
• lighting and other measures.

facilitating a house-to-house audit program targeting space, water heating and insulation in approximately12,000 households
• enabling retrofits on common areas in 75 per cent of all high-rise residential developments and communal hot water and space heating where feasible and appropriate
• a behaviour-change program to encourage resident involvement in the audit program, and the provision  of broad energy efficiency advice and information to residents.

What the devil do these fascist clowns mean by “business as usual”!

The aim, stated in the report, is to ‘cut emissions’ of business premises 2 times that set for residential properties. It’s clear what the following statement mean:

The City of Melbourne will pursue a range of measures to reduce emissions from road-based passenger transport, and the carbon intensity of the public transport system…

And, we come to the crunch, the aim of carbon taxes, eradicate, cheap, highly efficient, coal based energy (and it is in fact also clean):

proven renewable technologies such as wind on a large and small scale and solar power (photovoltaic cells). It is anticipated this will represent a small proportion of emissions reductions

Overwhelming evidence rolls in by the week as to how paltry the output of ‘alternative energy’ is and how economically destructive it is. So why has Doyle taken up hard Left - Greens’ policies to demolish capital, through savaging central power generation for scams that would mean round the clock power blackout for Melbourne as in, no power at all?!

It is highly likely new market conditions created by the National Emissions Trading Scheme and the new Mandatory Renewable Energy Target will ensure investment is realised to support the most economically viable, locally sourced, renewable and low-carbon
technologies within the boundaries of the City of Melbourne.

What we have is the very same lie spun by Greg Lindsay and the CIS, to lobby for carbon taxes. They will induce ‘alternative technologies’. Funny thing is, Lindsay and the CIS couldn’t say what they are and neither can Doyle, because they don’t exist.

Oh, I see, some bright spark said: ‘Caesar! Good news. Slaughter the cavalry’s horses for it will make a wondrous new fighting machine appear.’ What, readers, do you reckon the life-span of such a moron would have been?

Doyle sees his grand plan meshing with those of Bracks and Brumby, the carbon taxes that they imposed that are slashing power production in Victoria, which is why there were wide-spread black-outs of long duration last summer that killed Victorians. Doyle and his gang of thugs use the expression ‘de-carbonisation’ when what is meant  is destruction of cheap, efficient coal based energy. His grand plan doesn’t stop at that.

It included ‘geo-sequestration’, but it is stated in the report that this is no longer required because Rudd’s carbon taxes will incorporate that.

The real force of this declaration of intent needs no comment:

Call a temporary or permanent halt to building and demolition work and to businesses trading

create independent legal structures with the capacity to raise funds

 make new laws relating to new and existing development

Sanctions – exploit the range of regulatory options available to encourage building owners to improve energy performance. Options to be explored will include the potential for requiring disclosure of building energy
performance at the time of lease and sale, and the potential of a special levy or stepped rates according to building energy performance.

Hmmm, Doyle orders a tomb, the Great Musleum Melbournensias. A gargolic bust of Doyle will be stuck on its highest pinnacle.

This declaration also ties into Doyl’es embracing the Hard left’s attack on urban development:

The primary source of passenger transport emission reduction in the short- to medium-term (and which the City of Melbourne can reasonably influence) are policies and actions to facilitate a mode shift away from cars to public transport, cycling and pedestrian options.

Now, while lying about wind and solar power, Doyle and co also wish to put Victorians to another tremendous expense:

establishing a gas-fired power plant specifically for public transport energy supply. The plant could be used exclusively by the tram and train network, and depending on whether suitable…

Let’s run this, with the State and Federal governments, he wants to herd Victorians onto bikes and public transport. He wants to cut off cheap, reliable power to firms and households, thereby demolishing capital and so earnings to millions. He wants to build a tremendously costly gas plant to power up the Soviet style transport scam he’s so in love with.

Now, readers, I’ll stop here, I have not fully digested all that is in the report yet - vomit is hard to absorb, but at least there is a laugh to be found in it. He wants to plug buildings into windmills:

Micro wind turbine generators do not in themselves significantly reduce the carbon emissions of a business or building (typically less than one per cent). But if a strategy was adopted of installing micro wind turbines on all of Melbourne’s tall buildings, this would collectively contribute considerably to carbon reductions…

Doyle proudly affixed his signature to this manifesto.

This report was published in 2008, but it is the grand scheme Doyle is committed to. This little nobody is one of the Right. This pompus, bloated pygmy has sat there at ratepayers’ expense planning how to ruin them. This is what the Right call talent, a gun, a dynamo. This parasite, who has never worked in production at all, regards modest Victorians as beasts to be herded, punished and made to crawl on their bellies and this does sum up the Right, as much as the hard Left.

Indeed, it is Kroger’s grand election strategy to have, courtesy of the Left, Australians crawl on their bellies. He formulated it when Kennett lost to Bracks. Let the hard Left grind Victorians into the ground and they will come grovelling to the Liberal Party.

It worked and you can tell. It’s why the ALP has been in office for 11 years now and set to win the next election. But even if modest Australians were as dense as Kroger and the rest of the Right assumes them to be, it’s difficult to credit they would do as expected. Why should they when they know full well that the Right will do the same to them as the hard Left has been doing to them over a decade, and now also under Rudd. And there is Doyle, Baillieu, Turnbull, Greg Hunt, Tony Abbott: it is what they want to do Australians.

2. Doyle’s grand Plan to halt ‘urban scrawl

Announced in the Herald Sun article above.

Who coined, ‘urban sprawl’. The hard Left, that’s who, and to attack urban development and all those seeking to better their lives. The hard left wants to herd Victorians onto public transport, force them into little concrete holes, while they the ‘good and the true’ live in leafy suburbs, protected by ‘planning regulations’ from the peasants,  and drive around in cars on wide, empty roads. Jackson had cause to attack this some time ago, for these very reasons, in:

Greens wage war against the car, Gerard Jackson, Brookesnews, 3/9/2007.

Their view invariably ignores the fact that public transport is incapable of providing the kind of mobility and convenience that the car has so brilliantly supplied… “mobility and convenience” for the mass of people is not high on the agenda of middle class greenies. Not that they are unaware of the car’s considerable advantages. I suspect that it is these very advantages that greens particularly loathe and this comes out in their attacks on what they disparaging call “McMansions” and urban sprawl…

According to Fisher and Pfuellerr people like me are to be condemned because our low-density suburban style (greens also oppose high-density urban living) raises energy consumption. So what? There is a super-abundance of energy. What is scarce is the means, i.e., capital to transform it into useful work

A telling anecdote:

As soon as it was announced in the news over the radio on New Year’s Eve, around 9.00, that Robert Doyle’s  fireworks spectacular had to be cancelled he was interviewed. He was in a foul mood about it and understandably so:

He and Brumby couldn’t beam down on the tens of thousands of beasts gathered together for the herd experience and see them smiling at them, much like the thugs of the USSR staring down at the ‘crowd’ and the army on May Day parades, and watch them rapturously beam back at them. Footage of Stalin, Brezhnev, and the rest of them, infantile smiles spread across their hard faces, clapping their fat hands like children enjoying  a spectacle, and their slaves had no choice but to salute them and smile back, still sticks vividly in the memory.

Szoke, The Bracks-Hulls-Brumby Unero Numero neo-Marxist Kommissar, made another lame effort to wriggle out of some forthright questions on radio yesterday morning.

The context of the exchange on 3AW was the right of clubs to specify membership conditions. Szoke asserted that clubs are free to decide membership, which for the likes of Bracks, Hulls, Brumby and Szoke involves the horrifying crime of mere mortals exercising discrimination. She continued, ‘all that we require is that clubs be transparent, thatthey present themselves before VCAT and give good reason for exclusive membership.’

The telling question put to her was, ‘You decide this but who are you and the government to tell people what to do, dictate what people can and cannot do, and interfere in people’s lives and their associations.’ Szoke replied that she doesn’t make up the law, she merely applies legislation. That, she is merely a public servant employed to apply the law. This is entirely false. As for VCAT, it is a Kafkaesque torture house but with the difference that unlike the Soviet Union, VCAT is a hollow man.

The Cabinet, VCAT, Szoke and her fellow Kommissar, Sisel, rely on intimidation and the appearance of judicial legitimacy to secure the submission of Victorians to VCAT and they do, as law abiding, decent people, and suffer greatly for it. VCAT, the Inquisitorial Kafkaesque ‘court’ was developed and entrenched by the Right under Kennett. This is unforgivable, and a manifestation of what not only the diseased Left lording it over Victorians is, but also of the unprincipled, ‘Statist’ Right.

The question of clubs and their internal arrangements, as discrimination in general, is one of property rights. They have been totally overthrown in Victoria by both the Left and the Right. It amounts to a coup de tat mounted against Victorians. This is what is at stake, so it is not merely the freedom of clubs to exercise discrimination. 3Aw’s weekly feature ‘controversialists’ missed this point entirely in their questioning of Szoke. They further blunted their attack by conceding that somehow discrimination by employers is wrong and needs to be ‘regulated’ and ‘more action taken’. There is no difference.

Further, exercise of discrimination in employment, along with the overall freedom to hire and deploy factors of production is a crucial aspect of the overall competence of entrepreneurs and their development. This, with so many other things has been hampered not by the rule of common law, but the capricious regulations imposed by politicians who are so far removed from entrepreneurship that they might as well call it a criminal offence and, as a matter of fact they have gone some far way down the track  in doing it this year, as we shall relate in a separate item (not only Leftists, but also politicians of the Right.)

Employment regulations, bye the bye, do not merely hamper entrepreneurship. They involve other burdens. One is, they are a payroll cost, and when entrepreneurs plan hiring, they work on total cost of hiring and not just the direct cash payment to labour. The second thing is, like it or not, it does damage employment opportunities for women too, the very thing anti-discrimination regulations were inflicted to cure.

Other imposts such as credential-ism do further damage. What employers seek in hiring is types of competence, not bits of paper, as difficult as this is for politicians and bureaucrats to comprehend. In other words, employees, male and female can be as frustrated as employers in getting at what they can do to advance themselves by way of opportunities. One has heard many anecdotes and read many instances and observed cases that spells this out. The free market, rooted in inalienable property rights serves what the new ‘masters’ cannot effect in a fit.

Neither is discrimination important to the above only. It is vital for self-preservation. “Don’t associate with those thugs, young Peter/Hilda. They will drag you down into the gutters with them”. In today’s politically prescribed, non-rights driven action, parents exercising discrimination are committing an offence. It ‘hurts the person of thugs’. Schools must be non discriminatory as well as not allowed to punish thugs, and sod the victims of thuggery. Indeed, as an aside, much of the violence today didn’t brew up in an instant. It began in schools; it was very noticeable as early as the 1980’s. The overthrow of property rights has only further fuelled what is now an unceasing, horrifying crime wave in Victoria.

Szoke deceived the public on two counts in her comments. Not only public servants, but also bureaucrats ad aspiring Kommissars work to the overall lines taken by Cabinet. Let’s repeat a telling anecdote, an exchange I had with some bureaucrats in 2005. They interrupted a debate with a Judge over the force of ‘legislation’:

They, eavesdropping, turned and jumped in as soon as I remarked, `this isn’t the rule of [common] law. This is the beginnings of totalitarian diktat and secret police state thuggery. It is transparent.’ 

They protested that ‘You need to understand the processes of how legislation is raised.’ Their point being that they draft legislation that serves the lines indicated by a Cabinet. I replied that Parliament is still responsible and cannot, or should not be passing anything inimical to the rule of law and amounts to overthrow of constraints against the executive. The point being ladies and gentlemen, they saw themselves as actively pursuing agendas and here are some of the excuses they gave: 

1. `Public Servants are caring, moral, compassionate men and women:
The thrust: they are more, more compassionate, more moral, and selfless than many who are not public servants, namely businessmen and women and, generally, many employees in businesses.

2. `public servants are brighter than anyone else; this is the kernel of the early heresy, gnosticism, and its pseudo-rational, totalitarian equivalent, Platonism. Plato himself repented of his ‘philosophy’ but the damage had been done.

(I was appalled that they could have said anything so inane and false. That they could utter that rot as an argument in view of the conversation with the judge, which they butted into, actually puts them in the bad light of the demented, not the rational.)

3. This third reason is telling: They proceeded to demonstrate ignorance of economics, in asserting ‘government’ has to intervene to make entrepreneurs ‘moral’, prevent ‘abuses’, and  counter ‘market-failure’. The myth of perfect competition is behind this of course, and it is an assault on free markets. Rebutting the last was a waste of time, for they descended into an ad-hominem attack when I began to run the argument, and ranted right over the top of me. Your taxes at work, senior bureaucrats howling down someone for saying something they don’t like - ditto Szoke et al.)

This insight alone flatly contradicts Szoke’s claim. It is an insight into the descent from public service to bureaucracy, which the Right under Kennett fuelled and the Right have continued to assist this perversion of the former public service. A descent into bureaucrats see themselves as having top intervene according to their capricious agendas. This is only a short step away from what has proved the upshot.

Steve Bracks’-Hulls’ Kommissars Sisel and Szoke initiated the persecution of the Two Pastors. Over the blasphemy law, Jackson went out of his way to demonstrate it and HEROC and VCAT are toothless, by breaking the ‘law’. Faris Q.C. also confronted the Cabinet and their hand picked thugs, and so did I by breaking the  ‘law’.

During this rotten business, the persecution, the pastors were also vilified by radio stations and newspapers for good measure. A certain source within the Government told me that what the two pastors said is horrible. I shot back, ‘you are relying on hearsay because it is crystal clear that you have not examined what they said nor the expert testimony given on their behalf.’ That individual, to their merit, admitted they had not studied the material at all.

Jackson, however, managed a new twist, courtesy of Joe Cambria. Mr. Cambria sent Jackson’s most criminal act to Dr Helen Szoke, then Chief Executive Officer of the Equal Opportunity Commission Victoria. Her ‘reply’ was interesting in what it revealed about the Star Chamber proceedings of her Orwellian commission. Jackson related the fireworks in:

Bracks’ Star Chamber commission applies the law selectively against Christians in favour of Muslim bigots

I note that she also claimed, in “digging herself into an even deeper hole”:

The vast majority of complaints are finalised in the course of the Commission’s impartial investigation and conciliation processes…

There is nothing ‘impartial ‘ at all about it and VCAT. Further, as already set out on the OPA-STO-VCAT set up, in addition to explaining its Kafkaesque ‘procedures’, perversion of justice, I related evidence of indisputable perversion of justice on other, serious counts. Impartiality does not necessarily entail justice. Dictators impartially treat all their slaves to the same abuses. I might also add HEROC’s site and many another “government site”, including the OPA’s, is covered in neo-Marxist propaganda garbage. Duplicitous is not the word and neither is mendacious.

There are actions devolving on several things befitting all good tyrants. The Anti-Bill of Rights sums up the situation. The only right Victorians have is to do what is dictated to them on pain of punishment. There is nothing lawful at all about what has been rammed down in the Victorian Parliament. The Right have been instrumental in building this road to tyranny.

As soon as justice is restored in Victoria, and genuine, principled MPs are in Parliament and Cabinet, the likes of Szoke, Sisel, and the rest of that gang of thugs must be thrown out onto the streets without separation pay, not a penny, including their unearned, taxpayer super. Then this lot will discover how cute and cuddly they are. But the greatest exaction of revenge should be reserved for those responsible for the likes of Szoke, not forgetting, a thorough criminal investigation of the STO-OPA -VCAT set-up is required and this means there are those in the Right who will have to ‘face the music’ too. Indeed, is there any good reason for them all not being slapped with perversion of justice charges right now and just for starters?

If the 3Aw hosts, John Michael Howson and Nick McCallum, had locked onto the fundamental principle of inalienable property rights, and important cases such as the above, they would have had Szoke publicly crumpled up in a screaming heap over misleading the public and for what she is. As it was, she nearly went over the edge, as her repeated protestation in a strained voice showed all too clearly. She knew they’d caught her out. It’s too bad that they gave her wriggle room.

I’ll say this, though, they were better against Szoke than Derryn Hinch is when he has her on his show. Hinch is so considerate and docile to that nasty neo-Marxist parasite that I ponder the question of exactly how many rocks are stuffed inside his cranium.

The likes of Szoke don’t merely ‘apply legislation’. They make it up and then actively seek out victims to haul through their Kafkaesque, star chamber inquisitions. Indeed, on radio, she remarked people should bring cases before VCAT to ensure clubs explain to it their set-up and make themselves ‘traparent’ to Szoke and he fellow Kommissars. She was once again touting, trying to encourage Victorians to rat on others, to subject friend, neighbour and stranger to the farce. Oh, yes, ladies and gentlemen, the whole farce is summed in Kafka’s The Trial, banned in the Soviet Union because of its deadly accuracy. They can do this because of what sits in the Victorian Parliament, the Right as well as the Left. Lawless is their name.

In addition to the evidence that has rolled in from Japan, Europe, Britain and even within Australia of the disastrous impact of carbon taxes, which in Victoria led to the wide blackouts in summer that killed Victorians, we now have not only:

Study of the effects on employment of public aid to renewable energy sources, by G.C. Alvarez Phd., R.M. Jara, J.R.R. Julian, and J.I.G. Bielsa, Rey Juan University, 2009.  53 page report.

It can be anticipated more damning reports will roll in over the months ahead. The Spanish report alone flatly condemns each claim Greg Lindsay merely asserts - doesn’t bother attempting to justify and defend them, he merely asserts them. It is very important to note the Rudd Cabinet is using the same assertions to push its carbon tax. There’s more:

Arnold Schwarzenegger claims to be a Hayekian too. As the IPA and CIS, he’s heard of Hayek, he has like them, to be generous, seen the titles Road to Serfdom, Constitution of Liberty and stopped there. Schwarzenneger is far from being a free market Republican. Before Obama and the diseased Left Democrats were handed the keys to the White-house,

Schwarzenneger has done his bit. He has razed Californians with carbon taxes. Speaking against Obama’s villainous act of tyranny, the Waxman-Markey ‘cap and trade bill’, Republican Rep. Tom McClintock summarised the impact of Schwarzenneger’s carbon taxes and McClintock has a particular advantage, he is a House Representative from the state of California:

In addition to destruction of capital, and the flight of capital, McClintock attest to the contrary of what Lindsay also asserts:

Gov. Schwarzenegger assured us that AB 32 would mean an explosion of new, green jobs — exactly the same promises we’re hearing from cap and trade supporters. In California, exactly the opposite has happened. We have lost so many jobs the UC Santa Barbara economic forecast is now using the D-word — depression — to discuss California’s job market.

Waxman-Markey Is Our Smoot-Hawley

And this is what Greg Lindsay, the vested interests he is connected to, and Rudd,. Wong, Brown, Garrett, Turnbull and Greg Hunt want to do to Australians, wipe them out with carbon taxes and ‘alternative energy’. The difference between the Right and the diseased Left is the latter are motivated by their vile cult beliefs while the Right are motivated by their own wallets, they want to rich themsleves more by inflicting great pain and what promises to be irrecoverable long term economic damage. Let’s carbon taxes for what they are, deliberate economic sabotage on a tremendous scale backed on magical beliefs held by the fanatical Greens, propagated by their diseased Leftist allies and embraced by the kleptomaniacal, inbred, brain challenged Right.

The final abject act of Schwartzenneger was to betray the Republicans, attacking George Bush and expressing his full support for that treacherous Leftist thug called Obama. The CIS is in good company.

Obama, the only time he has told the truth, did declare the object is to destroy energy production, which means, as is occurring in California under a ham whose sobriquet takes on a certain twist, The Terminator, the destruction of the capital structure of the U.S. What was that you said, Professor Sinclair Davidson? Never mind, Professor, we have cause to return to you. Obama had an amendment attached to his carbon tax, a bit redundant in some respects but not in others, namely:

The amendment reinforces the totalitarian thrust of carbon taxation. It, moreover it is a measure the Brumby Cabinet of Victoria is working on - this is in addition to all the other ‘Kyoto compliance’ frauds he and Brumby before him dictated Victorians must waste money on when building new house, sending up the cost of house up by no trivial amount. The amendment is:

RUSH:  Have you heard about this, folks?  When you sell your house, environmental experts have to come in and do a survey to find out if you’ve got leaky windows, if all the environmental systems are correct, if you have relatively new appliances, and until you modernize in the way they say, you can’t sell — that’s in the bill.  I’m not kidding, Brian.  See, you can’t believe it.  You can’t.  It’s in the bill.  It was in this amendment that Boehner (Republican) read [the bill in the House].

 Arnie, diseased Leftist hugger and The Ratinator Terminator.

Greg Lindsay, through his monkey John Humphreys in asserting the anti-science and anti-economics lies, asserted carbon taxes are “as everyone knows the cheapest way” to effect compliance. It is lie. The Australian tax regime as it is, and by taxation I also include regulation, is very complex and very expensive to comply with and it is why companies have closed and transferred production to other countries.  Keating and the ALP, Costello and the Right intensified and extended the tax regime that strangles companies to death. Wayne Swann and Rudd have multiplied new measures which will swallow many in a right tax compliance nightmare.

Forget capital theory, the Right are no more clued in as to what is involved in running enterprises in Australia. All the evidence to date indicates carbon taxes are a nightmare to comply with but this problem becomes hypothetical, since the destruction of capital means no-one has to worry about compliance.

Anyway, the Rush page contains links to other damning items. In the meantime, the scandal of a suppressed report is blowing up in Obama’s face.  Here is the suppressed report:

Comments on Draft Technical Support Document for Endangerment Analysis for Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the Clean Air Act,  

By Alan Carlin NCEE/OPEI  March 2009.

The developments are related here:

RELEASED The censored EPA CO2 endangerment document – final report

EPA plays hide and seek; suppressed report revealed

Source inside EPA confirms claims of science being ignored, suppressed, by top EPA management

Fraud, and Lindsay and his chums see nothing wrong with its perpetration in order to perpetrate crimes on a tremendous scale, horrific crimes.

But some telling matters are being brought out:

Self-serving know-alls fuelled fires, The Australian, 24/6/09

THE bureaucratic ineptitude being revealed at the Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission is at once extraordinary and infuriating. The lessons have implications for every aspect of government in Australia and demand a radical rethink about the dominance of politicised bureaucracies within our lives.

The emerging picture eerily imitates Franz Kafka’s The Trial.

Government fire services furtively developed their doctrinaire rules, then enforced them with mindless zeal. Fire and emergency supremos were provided with limitless authority to bend citizens and communities to their rigid controls without effective scrutiny or supervision.

The article doesn’t pin why, who, and how. Let’s demonstrate with a case, the State Trustees Office. To recapitulate from previous articles:

I had originally assumed it was Bracks and Hulls who had converted the State Trustees Office and the Office of Public Advocate into a crime syndicate. This is wrong. Sources not only corrected me; they explained how and why Kennett, Stockdale and their advisers did this. From the item, What the Right did to the STO and Wards of the State, Pt.I:

The history of ‘wardship’ spans the 12th century to the present.

The origin of the STO is Henry II’s seminal decision to commit the Crown to fully uphold common law, and thus the property rights of Englishmen, and bind the Crown to being subject to Common Law. Property rights and economic free action are the grounds of common law. He swore to uphold Justice, and to ensure the rights of Englishmen. Later, consistent with this oath-sworn duty, the “Lunacy Act” formalised what had developed since Henry II. An Englishmen could have the King ensure and uphold his common law rights freedoms.

In other words, “lunatic” did not necessarily mean someone who appealed to the King was a lunatic. This is reflected in the word is as ‘depression’, loose and rubbery. By this, the King’s protection was not restricted to men, women and children who reason is impaired by an incapacitating condition. The 19^th century Lunacy Acts 1808 - 1853, for example, was a formalisation of the binding oath the Crown will execute service to those who, irrespective of reasons, sought it.

Those Acts were framed to also resolve problems discovered, arising out of executing that duty. The Lunacy Act of 1890 replaced them. Later the name was changed to “Wards of the State” and officers responsible for the administration of the Act accordingly renamed.

The Australian colonies followed all these 19th century developments. This was the basis of the establishment of the STO. This the foundation of the STO in common law and in statute…

The duty of the executive, was given crucial institutional expression, which was reflected and maintain through the  STO, to deliver on the duty to uphold the the property rights and freedoms of ‘wards’. This is not a business and Cabinets and administrative apparatus are not businesses; it is duty, and honour bound duty for good measure. 

What did the Right do?

They deliberately traduced the Crown’s duty to those who request it. They decided to establish it as a profit making enterprise. How was this to be done? The truth is, there was no lawful way it could be done. But a way was found.

They would generate the appearance the STO is a business. Secondly, they would fabricate the fiction it is a business by re-establishing it as a company entity. The original plan was to then float it on the stock market. It still exists as a shell company with the single issued $1 share still held by the Victorian Cabinet through Treasury.

To do all that, the appearance of profitability had to be generated. How was this to be realised? It was achieved by stripping the accounts of Wards of the State, and seizing other types of property, seizing property titles, imposing encumbrances, and selling them off. It was found the STO was a ‘profitable business’.

The above was reinforced by the lousy, not free market economics of the Right and their ‘think tanks’, the IPA and CIS, in particular, privatisation’ and the Kennett Cabinet was drawing advice from them.

VCAT - Is no court

Merely a toothless tiger serving as a goon squad to Cabinet and Parliament and this is black because the original function of Parliament is as a court of common law to stand up against lawless Cabinets.

VCAT is the instrument with which the actions of the OPA and STO against its many victims are ‘protected’.

While The Kennett administration asserted VCAT was to be a low cost resort in common law, in contrast to the expense of the regular courts, the reality is, VCAT is a mockery of the function of courts, and the result is a mockery of justice. As we have noticed in the case of Jennifer of Peter, VCAT proceedings are truly Kafkaesque. Kafka’s The Trial fits. VCAT is nothing more than an enforcer of the thuggery of politicians, and this is transparent through the operations of the STO and OPA:

They actively seek, in ways much like the actions of HEROC, to place as many Victorians as possible under types of Guardianship-Administrative orders. These orders subject victims and their property and victims under absolute control of the Government, which then strips the property, from accounts to the titles of the homes of victims. In the case of titles to homes and any other land owned by victims, the Cabinet, via STO, then sells the land and pockets the loot. Another wheeze is, closing down the bank accounts of victims, entering this as a ’sale of capital’ and charging the victim a selling fee.

It is, to say the least, a complete perversion and corruption of the true function of the STO and OPA. Mechanisms used to achieve this include the “Guardianship Act”. These mechanisms were put in place by the Kennett Cabinet, and have since been tightened by Bracks and Brumby to shut any loopholes victims could use to re-assert their liberty and property rights.

All that has happened since the defeat of Kennett, under Bracks and Brumbys is a spiralling corruption of important institutions and their functions. This has been matched, among other nasty developments and changes. It might seem trivial but it is a sign of this descent by Cabinet and Parliament into criminal thuggery that what should be mere administrators are now called, chief executive officers. The head of the Blasphemy Court, Szoke is one. ’Managing Directors’ is another abuse of language. This is all the more duplicitous because it equates those types with entrepreneurs, reflecting the descent from Statism under the Right into fascism under the Left. Their proper names are Commissar and Gauleiter.

The Bill of anti-Rights

Though imposed under the Bracks Cabinet, it was the Kennett Cabinet and their advisers who prepared the anti-Bill of Rights. Whatever alterations Bracks and Hulls made to it are trivial. The  draft“Bill” was prepared and completed by the Kennett Cabinet and their advisers, inclusive of making it a criminal offence for any Victorians to reassert their inalienable Rights against a criminal, larcenous Victorian regime by resorting to the High Court of Australia.

It is no mere usurpation of the inalienable rights of Victorians. The force of it is, the rights of Victorians are nothing more than the decree of politicians. They own and dispose of the property and lives of Victorians and this is the force of the Bill.

Things are worse than even the above suggests. Looking at the time frames involved, and the sequence in which Bracks, Brumby, and Hulls (under both of these “Premiers”) introduced the major bills and alterations, it is highly probable the Kennett Cabinet and their advisers also devised the Blasphemy Bill.

Kennett the arrogant anti-intellectual

I’m not saying Kennett and his Cabinet converted the STO and OPA, intentionally. Kennett, being anti-intellectual and this reinforced and fuelled his arrogance, as with ‘privatisation’ of water and energy supply  (as opposed to re-founding them on genuine free market foundations, a crucial distinction) eschewed rigorous examination and debate over what are very serious matters.

An acquaintance, who read the material on the STO and OPA mentioned a fierce exchange that I had missed, a few years ago. It was between Mr. John Stone, and one of the pseudo-free market ‘intellectuals’ and IPA supremo, Mr. David Kemp.

John Stone mounted a stern defence of the integrity and its maintenance of important institutions, and the conventions and practices generated over centuries that inform them, restrain them, and essential to their proper and sound functioning. Kemp sneered at the case as naive rantings, the notions having no place in the brave new, anti-free market world of the Right.

The only thing Mr. Stone has to take on board is inalienable property rights, which are the foundation, the ground of free markets, and common law and the institutions that serve freedom. This means, sound free market economic theory is indispensable and the thing is, the indication is that Mr. Stone is realising this.

The Right’s destruction of the sound and therefore highly moral cause of free labour markets and the related upshot of the Rudd fascist Cabinet has changed Mr. Stone’s long held stance that theory can be dismissed as useless. That, Mr. Stone now appreciates his previous position on economics was not merely wrong, it is a perilous position, as he now realises.

Will Mr Stone, and in view of his general standing and reputation, go forth in public on this and what that also involves, public recommendation of Mr. Jackson as a genuine free market warrior, and Dr. Shostak? For, he should in the face of the great perils Federal and States’ Cabinets, and Local Councils are forcing Australians to face, and with it the very evident fact that the ‘road to serfdom’ is now being rapidly laid by parasites called politicians.

The evidence of the corruption of the ‘public service’ and service entities presented before the Victorian Bushfire Commission is merely a symptom of the perversion of institutions and various entities. The Right have as much ‘blood’ on their hands as does the diseased Left. It has been more than a disturbing descent from the Kennett years to the Brumby Cabinet.

As for the bush-fires, they were caused by the Right and the Left, with their land-grabs and locking it up, converting them into fire-storm material. Victorian politicians killed the victims and destroyed their property. On this, the Commission is a whitewash.

Premier John Brumby preempted the white-wash, when he announced it:

Media and Brumby are daily running the line, Victorians must not ‘engage in finger pointing’ (Brumby) and descend to the blame game. It’s not a matter of a ‘blame game’ and ‘finger-pointing’. The fire-storms were deliberately caused by politicians of the major parties who used Greens policies against Victorians.

They murdered hundreds of Victorians as surely as if they walked up to them and killed them with axes. So, too, the 40 odd Victorians killed in the heatwave because of the anti-energy policies of Bracks, Brumby and supported by the Right. The Right also aided Bracks and Brumby through usurping the property rights of Victorians (the foundation of Liberty as reflected in Common Law) through such acts as the Blasphemy Act, the anti-Bill of Rights - to name only two of a very long list of bills Left and Right dreamt up to strip Victorians of their inalienable Rights. Ditto, local councils’ politicians.

John Brumby’s white-wash and Red Ted Baillieu’s agreeableness

 The new motto for car rego plates is -

Victoria The No.1 State for Lawless Politicians and Bureaucrats

Just some of the items posted on the STO and OPA: 

The Government of Victoria (Brackistan) is operating a large-scale criminal operation: Pt.1

Documented evidence for ‘Phase I’ of: Victorian Government’s criminal operation and State Trustees Office, and accomplices, and other parties.

Victorian Government has eliminated the inalienable rights of some Victorians

Victorian Government, : Office of Public Advocate caught red handed in commission of major crimes: perverting the course of justice.

I repeat the call, and justice demands it, all involved should be investigated. There must be an impartial criminal investigations and charges must be laid wherever they fall. This means politicians and their advisers cannot be allowed to escape such an investigation.

Economic thinking was initiated by the Greeks c. 500 BC. Under the Roman Empire, economics dropped out of sight. The reason was, the Roman Empire suppressed free markets, and the possibility for some, though this is not altogether straight forward. The Roman Empire was an administrative-military order. Life in Rome and Italy was a hard, miserable existence for many. For some odd reason, the Roman Games, contrary to current ‘orthodoxy’ in Victoria, didn’t do a blessed thing for the miserable sods, except for one thing:

The Games were a good blunt and bloody warning: Try anything against us and this is what will be done to you.

The odd massacre of smelly plebs reinforced the point.

It is unclear how much Victorians have been sacked for so that the self styled elite can “have fun”, as the likes of Robert Doyle and Red Ted Baillieu also happily declare. Yet, even these two bricks realise there is something needing covering up and so they tack on the rider, ‘and it is investment and means jobs and investment.’ Emperors spent huge fortunes on games, they had fun but the unwashed remained the unwashed and the Empire staggered and reeled on into collapse.

Ron started up the wheeze of Roman economics under Kennett. The Grand Prix. Walker explained on radio some weeks ago that it was needed to lift Victoria out of recession and gloom. The Grand Prix did no such thing.

Recovery in Victoria came the hard way, savings and its accumulation. I observed it in country Victoria, mainly because it was highly noticeable. Tellingly, because the 1980’s recession was so severe, and the Cain and Kirner Governments had spent and taxed until there wasn’t much left to tax. All that Kennett and Stockdale could do, was to reign in Government consumption. This explains a paradox:

The appearance of the Victorian Right as Liberals, when they are Statists. The Right solved their financial limitations by privatisation. This wasn’t a genuine free market reform of production of things hitherto controlled by the Government. It was a way to extract high revenues without taxpayers noticing. Thus, they established Vic, Inc., as advised by the IPA and CIS.

Walker has repeatedly declared, “You can’t buy advertising like that”. So what. When South Koreans were in recovery following the Korean War, they didn’t give a fig about that type of ‘advertising’. They were interested in only one thing, savings. Or, Hong Kong, or Switzerland.

Advertising has its place, as a subset of the logistics of some firms (not all firms) for distribution of principally high volume consumer markets. Walker’s notion has nothing to do with that important function. His, is a vulgar, meaningless spin on something that is nasty. Yet, Walker is not the only one to hold it… Bracks, Brumby, Doyle, and Baillieu do too. Left and Right are bipartisan in Brackistan.

Red Ted is attacking Brumby for throwing taxpayers’ money at golfing tournaments and Tiger Woods. There are those who might, at first glance, a glimpse of something not noticed for some time, a hint of Liberal principals. Don’t be a fool man.

His reason is the golf does not have the “international exposure” and attraction as the Grand Prix and Tennis. Well, Bracks and Brumby have thrown tens of millions of dollars at AFL, and they have no noticeable international’ appeal  either.

But, heck, if that is what warrants the confiscation of funds from Victorians so a few can “have fun”, I will come up with a ‘business plan’ that will guarantee ‘Australian, elite snail racing” is an” international” sport. This must mean I am entitled to a cool $50-60 million. Surely it must have at least that ‘value’, since Anna Bligh is about to sack Queenslanders for $60million to build a stadium for the parochial AFL.

Oh, it’s not only motor racing, AFL football, the odd multi-billion dollar Commonwealth Games, “international elite swimming”, and cricket either. It’s also obscure events such as netball, hockey, bicycling and lord knows what else. Bracks stiffed Victorians for $2b to have fun watching the Commonwealth Games.  So, how many billions have been thrown at sports in total?!

In 2006, Bracks threatened fines of up to $240,000 if media showed pictures of rehearsals for the Commonwealth Games’ opening ceremony. Today, Brumby might well be threatening anyone for finding out and publishing how much he and his Cabinet of larcenous thugs might by robbing from Victorians and throwing at golf games. After all, he has just attempted to do that over the water pipeline, despite the fact that it is Victorians who are being compelled to pay for this disgusting waste of their former private property.

The Herald Sun engaged today in a general spray against Red Ted. It would be good if the H.S. had a clue as to what to hit him for and why:

The latest example is condemning the Brumby Government’s initiative in bringing out the world’s most successful sportsman, golfer Tiger Woods, to play in the Australian Masters in Melbourne.

This was preceded by another economic illiterate and bosom pal of Brumby and Bracks, Eddie McGuire. Yesterday, McGuire made the same claims listed above, in the Herald Sun; the litany of international exposure, advertising that can’t be bought (bah, there are companies who do, for the right reasons), commercial impact, tourist dollars, and fun. Any who ‘knock it’ are kill-joys; there, opponents knocked over stone cold.

Of course the consumption fallacy, spending drives growth, is their excuse, as it is for Rudd’s $52 billion shopping spree. There it is. Romanomics Brackistan style is not investment. It is taking from Victorians, and it means they don’t get to spend it on what they value. No, instead they watch a few have fun, and fewer still made wealthier through nothing more than larceny and this is not the end of it.

It is not only robbing Victorians of their funds but what that means, taking funds that would be sunk into real  investment and blowing them away on another Romanesque “binge”. This means, consequently that real jobs are also destroyed. It is the stark truth of the cost: eliminating capital and the consequences of this, cutting real wages - a real decrease in living standards, a matter that is central to what is related in the article immediately below.

Ted’s complaint against Brumby robbing Victorians in order to ‘have fun’ watching Tiger Woods belt a little ball around is dead flat spastic. There is no difference between doing this to stage what Ted considers a modest local event and to stage “international events”.  Ted is not alone. He typifies the Right-wing clique that has destroyed the Liberal Party.

What the Right has jobbed into Parliamentary seats are windows into them. No amount of black-out paint works to conceal the ugly truth. Bligh and her ALP Cabinet, though hated by Queenslanders for what they have done, have been handed another term in Office, because of those unprincipled, economic ignoramuses the Right.

The Right have not only handed Brumby and his Cabinet of lying thugs the next election, they are cementing it rock solid. Then, that is why Victorians won’t vote for the Liberal Party, it exists in name only and what smears the name Liberal are, in many respects, no d…..d better than Brumby and his club of gangsters. There are those who are wondering if they are not a plant by diseased Leftists, but this assumes brains and the Right is too stupid to carry this off without being caught red-handed.

Having explained his great scheme, and not for the first time as will be indicated below, Union bosses turned white. After all, Union thugs, with country houses and other jolly items to keep, know as well as the Mafia does not to break the goose’s neck, just seize the golden eggs it lays.

This latest move is to fill the $2b plus no investor will sink into a ‘desalination plant’. Nature abhors a vaccuum; entrepreneurs abhorr losses. But then, entrepreneurs and investors don’t sink money into so transparently rotten non investments.

The scandal is gathering steam. Brumby has picked on no small fund either, at over $10b, after losses written off:

Cbus chairman’s report, Mr Willis blames large falls in equity values, domestically (28.5 per cent of the fund’s assets), and offshore (21.2 per cent). About 15.5 per cent of the fund’s assets were invested in property.

“These falls were very much a reflection of the severe shakeout in financial markets worldwide stemming from the sub-prime mortgage disaster in the US,” Mr Willis says…

(Willis, former Federal ALP Minister).

Neither, at a rather easy guess, is it only the Union heavies of Cbus, which is the unions’ fund for members in construction and building, who turned a shade of white:

… Carol Schwartz, chairman of Industry Superannuation Property Trust, in which Cbus has an 11 per cent stake, has stepped down. In contrast with Cbus, ISPT had a positive, 8.5 per cent return for members.

Cbus, it might be mused, is already one of the worst performing super funds. Steve Bracks, his bank vaults already brimming to taxpayers’ expense, is never at a loss for the next wheeze. He’s a Director of Cbus.

“Bass Water” is the pseudo business entity set up for the desalination fraud, with John Holland and ABN Amro listed as involved in it. ‘Bass Water’ is also trying to pressure union bosses to destroy their members’ funds in Cbus.

Bracks and Brumby have a black record on super funds, for example: 

How Rotten is the Bracks’ Cabinet? (8/11/2005). In 2005, Cabinet launched plans to plunder public servants’ super funds.

In 2007, a former head of the Victorian public superannuation fund resigned, returning to Austria. He managed to be both both blunt and indirect in stating his reason for resigning, ‘Cabinet’s political interference’ in his duty to run the funds successfully for super policy holders, crippling the capacity to make the right decision. He meant more than this, as the Cabinet was applying pressure to siphon funds, including from energy firms into alternative energy scams.

It is not unimportant to recollect, 

Unions defrauding superannuation funds?  18/7/08
A strong rumour is doing the rounds in Melbourne that at least one Union is siphoning super funds it runs into ‘alternative energy’ frauds. Their justification is Rudd will transfer billions into ‘alternative energy companies’ and this will constitute the earnings return to funds…  

Whether the Unions behind Cbus were some of the unions who contemplated shredding members’ capital funds in that way is an interesting question. If they are, whether they remain keen in view of the recession caused battering is another question. One thing is clear, fund members should be not only disturbed, they should go on the warpath to protect their golden nest eggs. After all, it is one thing to have union thugs skim eggs from the nest, but an entirely different matter to watch them all stolen and suffer wrung neck syndrome. 

Then we had this in 2007, ACTU is frozen over the aired allegations

Kevin Rudd has still to answer for two sets of very serious charges, “Heinergate”, and yes, covering up for Union thugs siphoning off superannuation funds - 

Is Kevin Rudd involved in ACTU’s super funds siphoning into shell ‘companies’

There is a connection, the Wootton funded coalition of treacherous Leftists under the umbrella, Climate Change Institute, which includes such thugs as Sharon Burrows, and reports directly to Rudd. As it is, after the 2007 Federal election, Rudd proclaimed super funds should be soaked to fund Federal Government squander.

The best inference as to why the Liberal Party decided to drop the cases against Rudd is because a number of the Right must be investigated, along with the Bracks and Brumby Cabinets, for what they have perpetrated via the STO and OPA. Under the Treasurer, the Victorian Cabinet has stolen, literally, a massive fortune from their many victims. The total to date involved is tremendous, but without a thorough criminal investigation it is very difficult to derive a reasonable estimate. We also know that at least one victim might be dead and this does mean. therefore, the charge of murder against Cabinet and not only its agents.

Yes, Bracks and Brumby are now at the centre of another criminal action, if executed, involving the ‘principals’ behind ‘Bass Water’ and Union thugs - if they agree.

This is Brackistan:  Lying, crime syndicates running bastards incorporated.

Media and Brumby are daily running the line, Victorians must not ‘engage in finger pointing’ (Brumby) and descend to the blame game. It’s not a matter of a ‘blame game’ and ‘finger-pointing’. The fire-storms were deliberately caused by politicians of the major parties who used Greens policies against Victorians.

They murdered hundreds of Victorians as surely as if they walked up to them and killed them with axes. So, too, the 40 odd Victorians killed in the heatwave because of the anti-energy policies of Bracks, Brumby and supported by the Right. The Right also aided Bracks and Brumby through usurping the property rights of Victorians (the foundation of Liberty as reflected in Common Law) through such acts as the Blasphemy Act, the anti-Bill of Rights - to name only two of a very long list of bills Left and Right dreamt up to strip Victorians of their inalienable Rights. Ditto, local councils’ politicians.

The Royal Commission is a white-wash

Justice Teague has declared much of it will be convened behind locked doors. Victims are justly angry and want the criminals brought to justice, but the evidence they have to supply in support of the demand force justice will not, consequently, be delievered in public. Then again, there is no need for a Royal Commission. It is obvious what, why, and who are responsible. Brumby and co are simply using taxpayers’ to gain time in the hope that they can evade justice, when prosecutions should be launched against the lying bastards now - and they should also be forced to compensate victims as well as face criminal prosecution.

Liberal Party: Red Ted Baillieu and the Supines

Apart from a couple of inane statements, this lot the Right have jobbed into Liberal Party seats, were in their typical spinelessness stone cold silent during the fire-storms. Believing it is now safe to come out into the open, and seeing that Brumby and the Greens are properly the object of Victorians’ desire for vengeance, Red Ted and the Lolling Blobbies went onto the attack:

He savaged the Bracks Cabinet for not having given sufficient warning to the victims. This is entirely false. Victims were warned and to repeat, warnings were not a problem. The problem was the fire-storms travelled at 200 km.p.h. and they were surrounded by the jungle politicians of the major parties are guilty pf creating. Escape was impossible for many.

Needless to say, the Left had a fun time with this latest act of callous stupidity by the clowns who lounge in what should be Liberal Party seats:

HARD CORE: Victorian Government media unit goes in very hard on bushfire finger-pointing

The real problem behind their failure to stand up for Victorians and demand justice be exacted against those guilty of the killings, and the destruction of a tremedous amount of property from homes to businesses is not only that they are unprincipled cowards. They are party to these crimes. And so are those who are responsible for them, the likes of Michael Kroger and their Brahman and Toorak Doctors’ wives backers. They saw nothing wrong at all in imposing Greens’ policies and, as the Left and diseased Greenies, profiting from massive land confiscations euphemistically called “Conservation Parks” and ”reserves”. Never saw anything in stripping others of property rights. They fully supported this, and profited from it as much as the hard Left  and Green fanatics do on both counts.  

To check, I remind readers of what I have reported on what the Right did with the STO and OPSA, turned them into a crime syndicate. I have called for criminal investigations, including any of their advisers involved, and this means also anyone from the IPA and CIS, noting they were the advisers to the Kennett Cabinet. The Bracks and Brumby Cabinets continue to receive tremendous amounts of stolen property. What a bloody hide, the STO is agains ‘advertising’, trying to encourage Victorians to name them their Trustees. I issue the warning again: any Victorian contemplating it, don’t. Any with elderly parents and relatives who are contemplating it or have signed up, act to get them to reverse that decision.

I remind readers of David Davis, who is touted as a leader of the “Liberal Party”, conditional on him moving to the Lower House: he refused to do his oath sworn, honour bound duty by one of his constituents who is a victim of the STO-OPA crime syndicate. This case is only one appalling case, many are far worse. Another case, one victim is believed dead, and if so, then it is a murder charge.

The Right pretend to be principled, and compassionate and considerate. It’s a lie. It is only a front they present to the public and I don’t mean only MPS. I mean the parasites in the Party machine and the Brahman and Toorak Doctors’ wives who have made sure these weasels dominate the Party, and there is no bigger scumbag and fitting tribute to this pack of conceited conmen and women than Michael Kroger.

Oh, yes, they are all for Brumby’s whitewash too. They also wish to save their own skins, and the sheer amount of wealth they recieve courtesy of ‘Government”.  Modest Victorians are nothing more than cash cows, slave labour, and mud under the feet of the Deah Rulers - Left and Right.

The Dog doesn’t bark because it is very familiar with the wrong things too. The rotten, larcenous bastards.

The Right laid the foundations of Brackistan, through Vic Inc. A scientist has gone public today, saying,”I’m usually against saying such things but Victoria has been turned into a totalitarian state.”

Well, the penny is dropping with increasing numbers of Australians and not only Victorians.

The Cabinet, bye the bye, is attacking him over material he produced, and trying to suppress it - expert evidence for a report. 

Instead of massive dams on the Mitchell River and in the Otways, Steve Bracks ordered a multi-billion dollar desalination plant that, it was reported this morning, has already incurred an additional $2billions black hole, and this is before it is completed.

Steve Bracks burdened the coal based energy companies and taxpayers with the fraud of windmill ‘energy’. His successor, John Brumby, then blew more stolen property on a ‘wave energy scam’. Not content with robbing Victorians blind and, for good measure, ensuring genuinely economic energy production, coal based energy, is cut, John Brumby has announced he will blow away hundreds of millions of dollars on a ’solar panel energy plant’.

The figure Cabinet has given is $100m. This is B.S. It is in addition to this fraud against Victorians:

Mr Brumby confirmed that the Government would proceed with a subsidy for electricity generated by domestic photovoltaic solar panels, known as a net-feed-in tariff. Under the system, households will be paid a premium of 60 cents per kilowatt hour for surplus power fed back into the electricity grid.

If ‘alternative energy’ was such a terrific proposition, investors would have have built such plants before now. Indeed, politicians inventing these frauds should be required to pour into them a very large of their:

‘Parliamentary salary’ and, let them lead by example, 100% of their untaxed, totally taxpayer kept, CPI fully adjusted superannuation. The difficulty with this is, it would provide them with even greater incentives to defraud taxpayers.

Bye the bye, one cannot overlook the vested interests Greg Lindsay and his CIS are serving, hoping to collect billions through nothing more than larceny on a greater scale. Greg Lindsay and the CIS have told a pack of lies to Australians in order to drum up support for ‘alternative energy’, including destroying coal based firms through carbon taxes will make ‘alternatives economic”. A barefaced lie, that is all it is, and from a ‘think tank’ that again lies to the public and donors in claiming to be a free market think tank fighting genuine liberal causes and defending the free market.

Carbon taxes and renewable energy: a disaster in the making, Viv Forbes:

Governments and the media of been spreading myths on the ability of “renewable” to supply Australia’s future electricity. There is no way that wind, solar, hydro and geothermal could supply 20 per cent of Australia’s electricity by 2020 without massive increases in electricity costs and severe damage to Australia’s industry and standard of living. The belief that we can go further and eliminate coal from our energy supply is a dangerous delusion. 

Wind and solar suffer three fatal flaws which no amount of research dollars, climate junkets, green papers, government gifts, carbon taxes, ministerial statements or imperial mandates will change. The first fatal flaw is…The output of both wind and solar varies or shuts down with little warning; this causes big problems in maintaining stability in large power grids. Thus any power grid with more than 10 per cent of its power supplied by wind and solar will risk sudden blackouts or damaging fluctuations. To maintain stable power requires that every kilowatt of solar or wind is shadowed by standby power (preferably gas or hydro) ready to switch on to full power in a very short time. The capital and operating cost of these standby facilities should be added to the real cost of “green power”.

 Lefty journo pushes green solar scam, Jackson:

If solar energy was superior to centralised electricity generation subsidies would not be necessary.

Solar generated electricity is a disgusting scam that has successfully tricked millions of people into believing that solar energy is a realistic alternative to power stations.

… in 1996 Citipower, motivated by what I can only describe as a public relations attempt to curry favour with greens and their half-witted media mates, installed 24 solar-voltaic panels on a family of four’s Brunswick home at a cost of $A25,000. The…

Let us start with a fundamental physical law. The maximum amount of energy that the earth receives from the sun under optimum conditions is just under 1 kWh per square metre (11 square feet).

Optimum conditions mean…At one square metre per panel (a total of 264 square feet), and assuming 100 per cent efficiency and optimum conditions, the installation will generate 24 kWh. Terrific! No it ain’t. The sun cannot…

the maximum efficiency achieved under laboratory conditions has been 24 per cent. Citipower’s panels, however, generated a maximum 83 Wh. That’s right — miserable 83 watts. This translates into a wretched 8 per cent efficiency. A maximum of 83 Wh times 24 gives us 1.9 kWh. (Would you pay $A25,000 for this?)

A killer case

Luz was a U.S. subsidised ’solar power energy company’,  that went bankrupt. Jackson also cites this case.

Members of Union super funds should panic

In the meantime, members of Unions should be very disturbed. Brumby has entered ‘negotiations’ with Union thugs to divert members’ funds into propping up the desalination fraud. Sound advice to members: move your funds into reputable, ‘hands off’, prudentially controlled, super fund managers. Things are not that hot with, going on financial reports, Union controlled funds as it is.

Doyle declared a few weeks ago, his trip to Russia was necessary. A diplomatic, internationalisto relations splitting fracas would erupt if he didn’t. War with the Muscovites! He solemnly told the victims, ratepayers of Melbourne, it was the only reason he is going, for he’s all against junkets. Why, the No.2 man of all the Russias wants to see him, the Nag of Moscow - for as Doyle inflated, being the Muscovite Nag means he could be the next Putin. Robert Doyle of the F.O. will do his duty.

His high level source inside Australia’s F.O. had briefed and instructed him. He blabbed it all over the radio to all Victorians and the rest of the world “this is very sensitive. Refusal will cause a crisis. I have to go.”

A briefing came in, and it didn’t look good. My friend got hold of it (he must have lifted it from the garbage cans littering Melbourne. I’ll doff my lid, he’s a canny cunning bastard.) Never one to keep to himself without reason top, top, very secret secrets, he whose name is a byword for confidence personified of course published the dirt:

Robert Doyle abandons his St Petersberg junket

Oh, dear, dear, dear. This was the junket top secret mission. Phut, cancelled. Australia’s top operative put himself on ice - not that he noticed any difference. He iced the whole show. The man knows what to do when he smells danger and his record is impeccable; standing down wind taking in the smoke from a fire long out is Alert and Ready never bested - even if the britches are a tad singed and the plastic surgeon fears he needs to apply a couple of gallons of putty like mascara on a broad of the night.

Strider, being the patriotic chap he is, did withhold some details of the racket. He needed a high-level chat. So we went to the pub and cooked it up, “Yes, we can do this.” So, here is the rest of it, and we might as well let slip who deep throat is - in for a penny so make it a pound I say:

Jim “Tiny Jumbo” Carruthers of the F.O. chatted to Doyle, behind the City Council chambers, while hosing a rose bush with a fire hose connected to a fire-hydrant and not the john! The meeting place was arranged in signals sent to Doyle’s office by a circuitous route and borne by a lycra clad retarded cretin riding a terror instrument euphemistically called a bicycle, who handed a butcher paper written in pretty crayons (he couldn’t rote learn it) saying, “Doyle, you little ferret, 1.00 pm tomorrow, be there or be square”, over to the bell hop who gave up his old day job because it had been wiped out by Hugh Morgan, and also so that he could stop crying and have a good laugh for once.

As Doyle and Carruthers stood watching thousands of gallons of water revive the rose and so did a crowd of serfs, who were promptly hauled off to jail unlike Greens who merely riot in the streets and injure police whom Commissar Nixon couldn’t give a stuff about either, the Bell Hop agreed to take a microphone used by that corrupter of youth and bloody liar Peter Garrett and secret it somewhere so we could get a complete recording.

The Bell Hop, because of his disguise could pull it off. He walked up to them and rammed it somewhere but I can’t say where, because I was too busy taking in the look of sudden pain that spread all over Doyle’s face and plugging my ears to block out his screams:

Doyle: “What was that?!”He howled.

Whatever happened, it must have been pretty nasty, because it was the first time the little runt had felt what pain can be like. Carruthers, concentrating on his mission, the cryptic code- no, not that sort of cryptic code. The frigging cryptic crossword, and he all concern remarked “Oh, do be quiet you big pansy,” and retuned to finishing off the last clue.

This is the transcript of the conversation, though Doyle’s remarks are omitted, inane pouting clarifies nothing and tends to wear thin after a couple of seconds:

“Doyley, Doyley, are you listening to me!”

[Deep throat soliloquises,’Most likely not, he’s in love with the echo chamber inside his cranium.’]

“Doyle! Pay attention. If you do not go to Russia, and meet a secret agent pet poodle code-named, Putin, there’ll be hell to pay.”

“Damn it man, stop admiring yourself in your beauty compact mirror and listen. You don’t go and it’s war, trade war with Moscow!”

“They asked you to come. I don’t have a clue on earth why, but they did.”

“What for? What for? Why in heaven’s name should I know. We’ve got nothing much to do with them. They’ve got nothing much to do with us. Personally, I prefer it that way.”

“Wing it, Doyle. Tell the serfs of Melbourne: You go because you will bring victory, mercantilist trade. Though what they’d buy from Brackistan beats me. Seems to me both your lot and the Bracks-Brumby gang have done a smashing job smashing enterprise in… what was its name? Ah, right, Victoria. Ah, I apologise, your lot turned it into Vic Inc. first, and Bracks and Brumby thanked you, heartily, for the good turn. No parasite worth it’s blood wants to put in hard shift now, do they.”

The above was followed around the time of Strider’s disclosure by a second stitch-up hush hush meeting which yielded the inside for Strider’s disclosure. The method of extraction was the same, even to the hour, bell hop and microphone, but on a different day of course.

It would have been bleeding obvious if we did it the same day. Thicker than a brick coated in cement and encased in steel as Doyle is, a chap has to allow even he might have twigged on to us and that would have been no good at all. I mean to say, I’ve never been able to stay in the same room as a cry baby let alone attempt to pacify one. Oh, Carruthers did offer a suggestion:

“Look chaps, it’s more than my life’s worth but you can pacify him. There are a few of us who sympathise. Putting up with a pack of prize pillocks selling you lot out, shredding your rights, stripping others of all their property through the OPA-STO is enough to make any good man puke. The only drawback is; they have infantalised too many Australians, drawing blood is an offence. Mind, that never worried greenies spiking trees to murder good men, or the diseased Left injuring and maiming others in one of their joy riots.”

“Damn it, Carruthers, we haven’t seen you and you seem a good chap, so why did you have to kill a good idea? What’s the matter with a bit of Burgundy tint all over the footpath?”

“Don’t be a fool man. You have the goods; go publish and be damned. I’ll sort things out my end. Bell Hop, good man. Do you reckon you can fit into Doyle’s suit? Good. We’ll insert you into the Mayoral Office, as soon as we have him sedated with a barrel of Bollinger and we’ll keep him there. He’ll be so full he won’t even be able to waddle out to piss on the lemon tree.”

Oh, dear, dear, now I nearly proceeded to disclose some more ultra very top, top secret secrety things. I’ll have to have a chat with my friend strider in HQ pub and sort out what we can cook up next.

P.S.

“… being the Muscovite Nag means he could be the next Putin.”

Might have stumbled onto something here. The Mayor of Moscow might be a bit slow or not realise that unlike the Putin-KGB-Communist Mafia in Russia, cream puffs from Melbourne wouldn’t topple him in order to move on Putin. Oh, they might dream about it, and in the safety of their clubrooms stick pins into figurines -’Take this, I got you…’ But up front, direct, ha! So Moscow cancelled Doyle’s junket behind his back.

It’s one hypothesis. Another is, they found out about Doyle, and realised they’d have a dickens of time stopping Russian women saying something unpleasant in front of the Nag’s entourage, “Lovely pink they’re wearing”. For their safety, Moscow cancelled the happy holiday tour.

Why did they have to go overboard with being considerate of others when their disappointed eager guests have never bothered finding out what consideration might even look like? There is a limit to decency and I’ll have to write to Putin and let him know, and he owes me a favour.

That’s 2, so I’ll stop here, the possibilities simply trip off the key-tapping pads.