Mangled Thoughts

Figuratively speaking.

To date, over 10 years, Centre of Independent Studies and Institute of Public Affairs have received $20 million. This splits into, to date, approximately:

Centre of Independent Studies $1m to $1.4m

Institute of Public Affairs $800,000 to $1m per annum

Keep in view, they are both treated for tax purposes as ‘philanthropic’ entities. Notice, such entities under the tax regime can invest in certain instruments which entail no capital gains tax to make even a brainy children cry over.

It seems that donors have multiplied the millions they are pouring into the CIS, judging by their latest expansion in clubrooms offices and staff numbers. Are they peculiar satisfied customers? The types who are in lurve with economic destruction through Co2 taxes? Readers, your guess is as good as mine.

For all these millions, which by the way could have built a few nice little enterprises and with the attached bonus, real jobs for some Australians, what do the donors get for the money - besides pro-Co2 tax propanda? This:

Professor Saunders the guy all in real jobs giggle at - oh and all the other clowns in the IPA and CIS too. No, truly, sources have told me, when they can stop giggling, they have had a bad job trying to head them off at the advice pass, defeated only by the illiterates holding the final yes or no decision making authority.

Chris Berg and Professor Sinclair Davidson reassuring Australians manufacturing really is only a home cottage hobby in ‘making things’.

Saunders telling those given a 100% pay cut because of effective minimum wages that they are dole bludgers and really should slave for a master out of gratitude for sudden idleness. [This jester shares another quality with Morgan, Day, Evans, and Moore, callous contempt for peasants].

Andrew “Andy Pandy” Kemp and Chris “the Castroingo Kid” Berg. Oh, don’t forget, Berg wrote masterpieces on why Che Gueverra is a real nice pop idol. Why Adolf Hitler is but isn’t at the present, and why the Stalinist regime of Cuba are really misunderstood adventure seekers.

The glorious achievement, the most fantastic piece of ground breaking scholarship and history ever produced:

Andrew “Andy Pandy” Kemp’s and Chris “the Castroingo Kid” Berg’s,
“Islam and the Free Market”. The IPA proudly displays its full glossy advertisement for it, as a masterpiece on history of economics.

Centre of Independent Studies writing a shattering paper, by the hand of the man they threw under a truck several times and shoved him over a cliff for good measure, then brought him back from the dead, to shove him under another road train just for the thrill of it, John Humphreys;

How destroying Australians via Co2 taxes is fun and can make the cleptomaniacal “Right” wealthy and sod the peasantry.

Their long run of success in crawling to the diseased Left, kissing their shoes and generally ensuring that what the Hard Left demands they can have. ‘Watermelon Red’ David Kemp put in a sterling effort in obliging the Greens’ and the diseased Left. He can now look forward to a happy retirement on the Kemp Family’s cash box the Institute of Public Affairs.

Yes, Sir, $20 million buys a man a lot of blood sucking, ignorant, yellow fishwives that at times are nigh indistinguishable from the diseased Left. Yes, there are times when I nearly call the boon dog “Right” diseased Leftists but I stop short. “Diseased” is reserved for the Hard Left. Besides, it would be an insult to the Hard Left. The mutton “Right” are cowards, their banner’s field yellow with a pink daisy in the centre.

Ooh, this is enough of this for today. Why spoil a pleasure by gobbling it up like some greedy hog. Slow lunching well into the future is civilised.

$20 million as good as blown away but it’s not. As the above figures suggest, rather a lot has not been spent on work. It’s gone down some gullets. Fat pigeon is a bird to be shot, stuffed, cooked, and eaten.

No! Golly gosh, is it true? It is entirely credible, given ACTU thugs are behind the plans of Rudd and Wong to raze Australians into the Stone Age.

A strong rumour is doing the rounds in Melbourne that at least one Union is siphoning super funds it runs into ‘alternative energy’ frauds. Their justification is Rudd will transfer billions into ‘alternative energy companies’ and this will constitute the earnings return to funds. Not that, if true, it is at all surprising. The ACTU has supported magic instead of science for a long time, and bunk instead of economics. The grey matter jogged -

Windpower, union stupidity and green lies

Recently, a minor union official complained about the impact of the financial markets’ gyrations. I appreciate not all union officials are thugs. Some are well intentioned and decent, though misguided - as in supporting measures that sees many given a 100% pay cut in the form of unemployment, by forcing effective minimum pay rates above market rates. The subject complained the market staggers is slicing the nominal value off his savings.

Assuming politicians were not bent on economic destruction via Co2 taxes and other tax and kill capital measures, over time the share market builds savings into a nest egg worth retiring on. Savers don’t have to be high income earners to achieve this at all. The current value of that official’s super holdings, therefore, is trivial, unless he wishes good stocks cashed in and to take a real loss.

He further complained, it is wrong retirement funds should be built out of investment in capital. He opined, ‘why can’t we go back to the old tried and true way of prescribed pensions’. This was when the official totally lost me. He clearly does not realise that there cannot be a ‘prescribed pension’ without capital and, crucially, capital accumulation.

Due to the ruthless immorality of anti-market labour pricing measures, worries over nest eggs is solved for the compulsorily made destitute. Their immediate worry is to obtain paying work, and then they can worry over accumulating a nest egg and its future value.

The lucky few with paying jobs, who are members of Unions, and have their savings policies with their unions, won’t have to worry about their nest eggs either. As reported, the Union heavies are wiping them out by throwing it down the black hole of ‘alternative energy’ frauds.

It does beg the question of lawfulness of these actions against fund members. Have the ACTU heavies told members they are plundering their modest savings to enrich their pals in Government and in extortion rackets called ‘alternative energy companies’?

Consider a new start up, genuine free market proposition. Super funds do not and cannot direct funds held in trust into supplying start up capital in ventures that may or may not succeed. Policy holders must approve such allocations and that means, being in funds that enable them to approve it, on evaluation of the risks should they, it is usually an insignificant consideration which won’t damage fund performance). Otherwise, individuals pushing some little amount, and those who engage in large venture capital raising and allocation do the work.

‘Alternative Energy companies’ are not free market capital formations. We can tell; they are subsidised to the hilt. They were set up only because Governments transferred tremendous sums to their ‘principals’. Funds stolen from real taxpayers and their genuine capital investments. They have no market value.

If what they were doing was valuable, investors would volitionally supply them capital. None have and, miracle of miracles - denied by the likes of Union thugs, Mark Vaile, Jeff Kennett, David Kemp, Penny Wong and Kevin Rudd, they plan long term and act rationally. They have seen the future in ‘alternative energy’; it does not exist. Therefore, they concluded, it is suicidal to extend capital to it, unless there is a genuine loony out there who reckons wiping out their own little all is a brilliant way to build a nest egg.

What many investors will not do, because they are neither suicidal nor loonies, the bosses of at least one union will do. Those bosses believe they can defy economics, the markets and, in the case of ‘alternative energy’, science.

‘Science…’ this must be qualified. Some things, windmills, solar panels, and ethanol are of course sound in science and engineering as such. However, they are not sound in science for the function, energy generation.

Solar panels and windmills, for example, cannot generate sufficient energy to power a room in a tiny house, and this is before economically efficient production. There is no scientific and thus engineering basis on which to achieve economically efficient production. By definition, therefore, to allocate capital into those schemes is to destroy it. Here’s a case study:

1. In America in 1991, LUZ, a solar-electricity generating company, went into bankruptcy. LUZ is interesting because it had been asserted by zealous solar power supporters (especially in the media) that the company’s technology had made solar power an economic alternative to nuclear. Even Fortune magazine waded in with support. LUZ had built its plant in the New Mexico desert to take advantage of the highly favourable conditions. But even there they could not make their 354 MW operation pay, which brings us right back to Suzy Freeman-Greene.

What is also crucial about the LUZ collapse is, ‘alternative energy schemes’ (they are schemes not free market, capital investments) are heavily subsidised. To follow the ACTU bosses, the collapse should not have occurred because LUZ was a major beneficiary of large subsidies. The ACTU are not only economic illiterates, they are also financial ignoramuses.

Financials is about capital. Financial profit is capital accumulation. So, why did Luz collapse?

The price of capital, of shares in a firm, is the sum of the present value of expected future earnings. The allocation of capital into a firm that produces nothing valued has no future earnings. It can only finish in bankruptcy. Here we are talking about earnings before whether a firm is justified. There are enough who sink their savings into loss makers, but no one volitionally sinks their savings into something for which earnings are not possible or are so trivial as to be as good as zero. Subsidies are not real earnings.

Profit: there is no single rate for all companies to justify their capital allocations. One company might require a gross of 12% another 30%. Why 30% but to leap the hurdles of taxes including regulations in order to yield its owners a return justifying their backing, the net return. Governments wipe out advantages in various investments because of the savage burdens they impose. The destruction of the former multi-billion petro-chemical production companies in Australia typifies that force.

A firm in profit means capital accumulation, which is applied to maintaining capital in existing production, expansion, and for new investments. Loss making signals capital extinction is occurring and the question is, can it be remedied or must it be shut down to stop further liquidation of capital. Subsidies over-ride these very important signals for action. They create the chimera of success when capital locked up in failing firms is being consumed. It gives the appearance capital is being maintained when it is being consumed.

Subsidies to alternative energy companies is not papering over loss making. It is deliberate fraud concealing funds sunk into them is instant capital destruction. There is nothing there. They are shells for the commission of larceny - private property seized to only make the politicians, a few bureaucrats, and con men pretending to be businessmen wealthy.

If the rumour is true, and it is a very strong rumour that has now been broadcast over the airwaves, then the ACTU are defrauding their members! Subsidisation is the mechanism to be used to conceal from fund members the ACTU is wiping out their modest savings. They are doing this in anticipation of Rudd transferring tremendous sums into the hollow schemes called alternative energy.

It follows, and it is a very strong rumour, do not grounds for criminal investigation exist – in common law and, interestingly, under all the Acts the Federal government has put through covering such actions? Will the ATO also investigate the ACTU? The ATO launches investigations on reasons feebler than a strong rumour against others who, for example, are merely trying to preserve their own private property against confiscation by Government and, the ATO has them thrown into jail for it.

After all, if a non-Union fund were to do what the strong rumour lifts out as above, just now broadcasted by 3AW, its officers would not only have broken trust. They would be convicted of a long list of criminal and lesser charges, thrown into prison and their own assets would be seized - to compensate their victims.

To reinforce the above, follow up points and reading matter:

The duplicity of Citipower solar panel experiment:

Citipower’s panels generated a maximum… miserable 83 watts… a wretched 8 per cent efficiency (for the total price to make and install it) of $A25, 000…

If the family “saved” a hypothetical $A100 a quarter in electricity bills that would have worked out at $A400 p.a.. This means that it would take this ‘investment’ 62 years and 6 months to break even. But when we discount the return (as we must because a present dollar is worth more than a future dollar) by, say, 10 per cent this ‘investment’ will never pay for itself. It wouldn’t even repay the family’s $A5000 investment. Then of course we have depreciation. If this is set at 10 per cent, for example, then the installation last for 10 years. Even if you run it till it falls to pieces, it still cannot pay for itself at these prices. This is what is called a lousy investment. It’s also lousy science and lousy PR.

Government MPs plan to rip millions off in subsidies for ethanol producers [Which they promptly did]

How the Bracks’ Government will cut Victorians’ living standards [And Victorians are yet to discover how deep the bottom of the pit is]

Erwin Jackson of the Australian Conservation Foundation, [Stalinist Green’s front and is subsidised to boot - Watermelon Red former Ministers pretending to be genuine Liberals also happily threw very large sums at those treacherous, Islamo-fascist - Hugo Chavez supporting, diseased bastards] railed:

… unless an Australian government throws buckets of dollars at that green fantasy called solar energy we will all be “rooned” (The Age, It’s clean and it’s green, but Howard isn’t interested in it, 26 September 2006).

And what does our intrepid investigative reporter throw up as evidence? The fact that other governments subsidise solar energy. And that’s the key — subsidies. If solar energy was superior to centralised electricity generation subsidies would not be necessary.

Green economic illiteracy, money-grubbing CEOs and windmills

Advocates of capital destruction and fraud and larceny to prop up ‘alternative energy - because they reckon razing Australians to the Stone Age is the way forward - reside in/associated with the Centre of Independent Studies. This lot pretends to be genuine free market economists. Genuine Liberals cringe, diseased leftists split their sides laughing (as they do over the IPA and the HR Nicholls Society - David Kemp boasted The HR Nich. Soc. is feared by the Left in Parliament - I cracked up laughing when I read that speech to his fellow HR Nich. Clubmen)

Jason Soon is one of them and, darn, is that guy shallow and callow and callous. Such types have to be callous, because no one decent contemplates wiping out millions of Australians using a pack of lies to justify totalitarian, criminal action on a massive scale. And so,

“To suggest, as Jason did, that we should implement a carbon tax because this will somehow force science to eventually find a better solution is not only naïve it is utterly reckless. Jason’s logic leads us to conclude that to find a decent substitute for petrol the government need only raise the excise to a prohibitive level.”

The boy is as hot as his stable- (play) mate John Humphreys, and these are only two of Greg Lindsay’s gunmen:

No one rumbles with his No.1. hitman, Professor Saunders, because they can’t stop giggling to bother with him. Truly, I’ve tested this by mentioning his name around the city, to heavyweights, and they all burst out laughing.

Dr. Jack Wheeler, To The Point News, set out:

Ethanol has only 2/3 the energy of regular gas, so you get 1/3 less energy per gallon, which means it adds 33 percent to the gas-per-mile cost of driving. But there’s also the cost of ethanol transport, which is by truckload or railroad, much higher than by oil pipeline (which ethanol can’t use because it can’t handle any water seepage like oil can).

The argument that ethanol reduces emissions is a fraud. With a modern car engine’s oxygen sensors and computer-controlled fuel injection, there’s no difference in CO (carbon monoxide) coming out your tailpipe with regular gas or ethanol.

Hell hath no fury than folks threatened with the elimination of their government subsidy. The question to ask the corn farmers is: if ethanol is so great, how come you don’t run your tractors with it and use (far more economical) diesel instead?

One qualification is in order: ethanol emissions pump carcinogens into the air.

Next to being a fraud, ethanol production, which Andrew Bolt advocates as the way to go, is destroying the lattice of food production worldwide with horrendous famines now a real danger. Tim Blair refuses to attack his guru, Bolt, over this fraud, and his other pals in the CIS and IPA and HR. Nich. Soc.

Greens are the enemies of liberty

Economic growth is under attack by greens

Shockingly, they are winning what is a ‘war’. This is due to the unprincipled illiterates who have wrecked the Liberal Party. This lot, when in States’ and Federal Parliaments imposed many measures the Stalinist Greens and their hard Left allies in the ALP demand. This ‘achievement’ was ably assisted by the cretins in the CIS, the IPA and the HR. Nich. Soc. They served the treacherous Left and not Australians - and they are too stupid to realise this is exactly what they did and continue to do - ditto Blair and Bolt.

That is the line the mainstream media is running, and it is wrong. It is nothing more than squealing vicious fishwives, who thirst for power. As for in-fighting, they couldn’t survive three minutes a Leftist faction fight.

The kitten spat has nothing to do with the Liberal Party and its members. Members are only good for handing over fees. Members must Keep their place as mere dumb serfs. Members must not enter the presence of the Uber Lords, lest they are offended by the unwashed.

The Right’s control and wrecking of the Liberal Party is due to Michael Kroger. Michael Kroger is not the subject. It’s been some time since the last scrutiny of Kroger and his backers; this fun past-time is for another day.

One is no longer interested in Red Ted and his antics. He’s only a symptom of the disease called the Right. There’s no point in kicking him for many reasons, eg.,Ted doesn’t have a grip, (neither do those out to knife him). Secondly, despite his stupidity, he is fundamentally a decent man, which cannot be predicated of the thugs trying to stab him to death with a rubber flensing knife. Thirdly, it’s not his fault he occupies a safe seat and is leader of the Opposition - the Right put him in.

The interesting development is Kemp’s split from some of his buddies, notably Michael Kroger. My Mole in 104 Exhibition St. tipped me off but I enjoy Andrew Landeryou’s take on the Brawl of the Vicious Fishwives. The Other Cheek also draws attention to Kemp’s past:

Kemp has displeased factional operatives on both sides since becoming president by … a “pious and sanctimonious” mindset that…forget(s) his past and pretend(s) he lived another political life to the head-kicking and scalp-taking that actually got him into Parliament all those years ago.

Party members will be fascinated to see…how dirty Kemp’s hands are…(” KEMP UNDER THE GUN:” 15/5/08)

I remind Landeryou history for the Right begins when they wake up each morning. These are the guys who have not heard of the “German economic miracle”. Forget,eg, asking them why the 1930’s was an economic axial period of the 20th century.You will receive a blank stare and, a long time later, a reply to this effect:

“axial…ah. They are the thingummies attached to car wheels.”

That is the calibre and depth of responses I’ve received when I have asked graduates in Law on subject matter requiring scholarly grounded expertise.The Right is packed with lawyers that bright. Kroger and Costello are lawyers.

Kemp’s antics in the 80’s devolved on a grab for power. He freely before the public’s gaze sank his ballerina boots into ‘Wets’ and grabbed their blue-ribbon seats for himself, his brother, his chum Costello and his ex-chum, Kroger.

Ted is dead, but who will emerge as Caesar? Kroger? The mendacious propagandist for devastating carbon taxes, in the form of the ethanol fraud, Andrew Bolt, is flying cover for Kroger and Costello during this campaign the Brawl of the Vicious Fishwives. He’s blaming Ted.

Bolt was silent on the truth. Kroger, Costello, and their stick puppets have been working against Ted for some time now. Actively undermining him. Ted had to take it without lifting even a finger in retaliation.

Bolt asserted, Ted is indulging in a witch hunt, demonstrating paranoia. Wrong. If it’s paranoia to go after those sticking a knife in your back, it is the right sort of paranoia.

Ted’s problem is, he doesn’t know how to fight and campaign. It shows. He picked the wrong Brawl field, the Plains of Releasing Emails. That’s Ted’s crime; thus it backfired. Mind, it’s a good thing he did it. It flushed out a Jew hater. Bolt covers for nice sorts.

However, what is Kemp really up to? I’ve quizzed some senior Liberal figures. They too hope the wreckers blow themselves up in this fight. Their answers are only speculative. Here’s my assessment:

Kemp is mounting a coup-de-tat against Kroger. He wants to be Fuhrer. Kemp has his own ‘power base’ now. Stubby holder documents the sheer number of lackeys Kemp has groomed and is steering towards blue ribbon seats is an eye-opener.

Kemp is attempting to impose one of his finger puppets on the seat of Higgins. To succeed, he needs the co-operation of Costello. It also means crossing Kroger, who wants to impose the walking royal chamber pot called Julian Sheezel.

It meshes with the latest news. The Kroger camp has promised they will neuter Kemp if he persists. Landeryou has documented this. Can even a flea be neutered with a plastic knife? But it’s the Right. Their nuts fall off at the merest hint of trouble: afraid of the left-dominated media they shine their boots, saying “Sir/Ma’am, I never meant to offend you”, as the IPA and the CIS also do.

It’s not about principles. They don’t have any. It’s all about power. This is why the Victorian membership is all but non-existent at 5,000. The brawl is ramming home to an unconvinced few how bad the Right is.

A new stream of genuine Liberals is fleeing the “Liberal Party”. They are appalled. How strong is this current? They have been flooding talk-back radio in order to say what they are not free to say in the Party, and are punished if they even dare to by Kroger and Kommissar Kemp. Flaps are the preserve of the Right.

The Brawl is showing to the public the Right is not the Liberal Party. That, they merely seized control of it in the 80’s and proceeded every day since to bash the living daylights out of it. That, the Right hold Liberal principles, members, and modest Australians in contempt.

The Right made this plain to all a long time ago. Back then, few took their callousness, contempt, venality, cowardice, thuggery, and treachery seriously for what it showed. The question is, can the Right be shot out the door before they completely finish off the Liberal Party? This, as the issue of The Brawl, is a good prospect and thus pessimistically held.

Liberal members, stand up to them. There is nothing to fear. They are cowards. There is nothing to lose and everything to regain - Liberal Integrity. Lay into them. The thugs have reduced good, genuine Liberals. Look at Liberals who have been stomped on, and all those who have abandoned the Party. Look at the condition of the Federal and States’ Parliamentary wings. Then, you will know what to do.

What do the CIS and IPA have in common? Answer: Hugh Morgan. Besides destroying WMC, then wrecking the campaign for labour market reform and inflicting great damage on the Liberal Party, what other little destructive schemes is he involved in? The answer is, ‘alternative energy’ scams.

The CIS is less than candid with the Australian public, and its donors. It, in fact, has a direct conflict of interest, detonating on its seniors’ full endorsement of Humphrey’s very defective paper, “Exploring a Carbon Tax for Australia”. The conflict is this: direct pecuniary interests in ‘alternative energy’ and ‘carbon credits trading’.

The upshot is the CIS has no credibilty at all, marked by a blatant and yet idiotic attempt to conceal their conflict of interest in what is a very serious matter. It is a matter that if executed by the Rudd Cabinet, means real misery for millions of Australians and real capital destruction on a massive scale. The dishonesty of the CIS is deliberate.

There are those who, when they have read this article, might even add, “they have deliberately committed intellectual fraud, in a lame attempt to conceal their real interests.” What the CIS has done is very bad. Read on and find out why.

A fascinating snippet.

A director of the CIS, Mr. Peter Yates, has an immediate vested interest in one of the scams. Mr. Yates is also a director of the ‘carbon credit trading company’, Peony Capital. Does anyone else involved in the CIS have a vested interest in Peony, and also any other scam called an ‘alternative energy’ or ‘credit trading’ pseudo-business?

Bill Gates and his wife supplied the funds for Peony. One never questioned Gates the entrepreneur who revolutionised the computer, delivering a great machine right into the home. Outside his forte, he has shown a propensity to silliness, even stupidity. Gates takes up leftists causes. Or, perhaps, he just wishes to feel loved. His cave in to”Global warming” is a nasty indication of shallowness, a nastiness heightened by his decision to back the fraud of ‘carbon credits’ and ‘trade’ in them.

Sucking up to the US Democrats hasn’t paid off, since they punished Microsoft or, rather, through Microsoft consumers of its products. What the Clintons and their fellow Stalinistos do, the Euro socialists adopt, and they stuck the knife in further, as the latest Euro kangaroo court ruling against Microsoft shows. It’s plain why: Bill Gates didn’t hand over a big enough bribe to the Clintons and Al Gore. Yet, Gates persists in appeasing leftists.

Peony is, curiously, based in China. How convenient, given Kevin Rudd is attacking allies such as Japan, while bending low over for the Peking Geratric Buggery club. All this and preparing to impose ‘carbon credits’ on Australians. It’s more than convenient, its a cosy set up for those who are about to fill their bank accounts on the back of another massive fraud. The purpose of Peony is to clean up in “carbon credit trading” and not capital investment in real free market production. Peony’s website is at least honest about the thuggery it was set up for:

Our focus is on achieving attractive returns by investing in sustainable development projects and then managing the carbon credits created. We make equity investments in selected projects.

Working in partnership with project developers, financial institutions and the Chinese government, Peony invests in CDM projects in China that have the potential to generate CERs.

and remaining fully involved in the project to ensure the maximum delivery of the CERs.

Ron Walker and Hugh Morgan; their ‘alterantive energy scheme’ to get hold of billions of dollars out of hard taxed Australians, courtesy of their best mates - ALP Governments.

With his mate Ron Walker, already wealthy thanks to the racket called the Grand Prix, Morgan too wants to be made wealthier than he already is via professional dole bludging. How? Morgan and his fellow scumbag called Ron Walker want the Federal Government to rob modest real taxpayers of their hard-earned pay and transfer the proceeds into their fat bank accounts through an ‘alternative energy’ racket, in the form of nuclear power generation.

The coal fired electricity plants are clean, low cost, very efficient, marked by the sheer capacity supplied at low prices – that would be even lower if it were not for Australia’s politicians and bureaucrats. Walker and Morgan consider themselves fine Liberal Party members. Ordinary members, and most modest Australians know what they, and their pals the likes of Costello and Kroger really are. Morgan considers himself a great defender of classical Liberalism and, crucially, classical economics. What Morgan really is shows up how delusional he is in this conceit.

Remember, Morgan is the man who in 2005 puckered up to ABC TV cameras, in the odd belief the camera loved him. ABC TV cameras did, as Morgan destroyed the campaign for Labour market reform and the Liberal Party’s 2008 re-election chance in a matter of a few minutes.

Morgan has showed his colours. He is not a genuine Liberal at all. He, as his pals, doesn’t give a stuff about economic liberty and general Liberal principles at all. They are concerned with only one thing, themselves. Neither does he give a stuff about the damage he has inflicted on many Australians, nor the economic destruction that can be wrought by satiating the Green Goddess of Death.

Not Hugh Morgan. No, with his fellow parasite called a Ron Walker, Hugh Morgan puckered up once more for the cameras, last year. He and Ronnie “Biggs” Walker announced through the media they were setting up a nuclear power company.

Ronnie “Biggs” Walker is no more an entrepreneur than Morgan is. He is cheify weify, for example, of the Fairfax communist propaganda rag, The Age. The Age was saved from a well-deserved fate, bankruptcy and closure, courtesy of Ron’s two other close pals, Steve Bracks and Brumby. Those two thugs shovel mountains of taxpayers stolen pay packets to prop up the Spencer Street Soviet’s “Pravda”.

It’s funny really, a ‘Liberal’ in charge of a Stalinist organ, which makes ‘profit’ courtesy of the larceny of the Bracks-Brumby Cabinets. A ‘Liberal’ who appointed the Trotskyite Jaspan editor of ‘Pravda’. A ‘Liberal’ who has made another fortune by the same type of mechanism, Bracks and Brumby transferring millions of stolen property into his pockets, using that exercise in economic cretinism, the Grand Prix as an excuse. Walker and Morgan expected Morgan’s mate, Peter Costello, to do for them what Bracks and Brumby have done so generously for Walker.

It might seem sad their hopes were dashed when Howard was defeated, and their fellow rightwing parasite, Peter Costello, denied his ambition, ‘power’. It’s not sad; Ron Walker has obvious advantages as Morgan’s partner. Walker shows how you can suck up to leftists and do splendidly: “Hughie; you’ll see, Rudd will come round and fund our nuclear energy company; the left are my best bed pals.”

What has to happen for their scheme to get up is not only Rudd transferring hundreds of millions per annum into their coffers. The economically efficient coal fired electricity production firms have to be priced out of existence. In their media conference, Ron and Hugh said just that: the government should force the price of coal generated electricity up to a level that makes sinking funds into nuclear power plants viable. This amounts to three things.

It’s a direct subsidy, through govt. using coercion to force prices up, and that is before other types of transfers. Capital destruction, and not only of the coal based energy companies. The coerced immiseration of Australians, from the cut in power supply, to shouldering the consequences of economic carnage, including more unemployed Australians. The editor of Brookesnews has covered the second fact only this week,

Why is the Centre for Independent Studies supporting the destructive carbon tax?

Next to the destruction of capital and the immiseration of millions of Australians due to the ‘alternative energy’ scams and ‘greenhouse gas reduction’ fraud, the rub is clear. The racketeers behind ‘windmill’ and ‘ethanol’ ‘firms are being made wealthy due only to coercion by State’s and Federal Govts.

After all, without the violence of coercion, those schemes don’t in free markets survive a casual idea tossing and binning it session. To mark this, Bracks and Brumby compelled all Victorians by an “Act of Parliament” to directly subsidise the windmill fraud they set up. Now Victorians have to pay for another fraud cooked up between Bracks and Brumby, the ‘desalinisation plant’.

What is the definition of ‘alternative energy’?
Answer: an excuse for an already wealthy, bi-partisan oligarchy to enrich themselves many times more by seizing real taxpayers’ private property.

How the ‘alternative energy swindles are mounted.

Faced with those bare facts, we see the difficulty faced by the racketeers. It’s not simply that their fraudulent operations could never be established in free markets. Most Australians would be very hostile at any attempt to impose them. The ‘bosses’ ( they put the Mafia to shame) have had to prepare the way through political propaganda campaigns.

The grand lie of man causes global warming has been one leg of a monstrous propaganda campaign mounted not just by the Greens, the Democrats, the ALP, and the media. The ‘wets’ and ‘ dries’ in the Liberal Party and the National Party also, having thrown millions of taxpayers dollars at it, inclusive of a deliberate brainwashing progrom which was directed at schools.

Coalition Ministers boasted in Parliament of their brainwashing progroms for school children. They probably studied Peter Garrett’s ‘bible’, the KGB handbook for the Greens, ‘How to corrupt children’). This is where the CIS and IPA come into the picture.

Morgan threw millions of WMC shareholder funds at the IPA and CIS. Morgan, bye the bye, appointed that devotee of Fidel Castro, and notorious Melbourne neo-Marxist, Joan Coxsedge as environmental adviser to WMC. It puzzles me why shareholders endured that man’s perfidious habits, and did not, instead of mollifying, him, ram him through the courts to recover every cent he plundered in order to line the pockets of Coxsedge and those professional dole bludgers in the IPA and CIS.

In the above linked article Jackson condemned the very bad paper by John Humphreys, “Exploring a Carbon Tax for Australia”. I had also attacked it, last year, in, “The odd couple”

What is pointed is, the IPA has not fought for free markets either. “Privatisation”, for example and one of their great ’causes’, has nothing to do with free market supply, and thus really serving consumers. It is about extracting as much revenue as possible from long suffering modest Australians and funneling it straight into the coffers of ‘government’. Bracks’ and Brumby’s treatment of the ‘privatised’ firms in Victoria typifies this real aim. The IPA in its “Bash Howard” bumper issue demanded what that lot did to Victorians should be made policy in all other states.

Like the CIS, the IPA’s position is not fighting politicians and bureaucrats over wrecking markets and with it, destruction of capital through regulation and all other types of taxation. No, as many an article in the IPA alone makes plain; they are concerned to ensure ‘government’ imposes the ‘right sort’ of burdens and this begs the question; What sort is the right sort?

Next to other destructive implications, taxation (regulation is a tax) is also a ‘backdoor’ means of protectionism. To follow the money trail, ask the question, Who benefits? Maintaining the lie of man causes global warming to conceal the aim, both the CIS and IPA are serving only the scammers behind ‘alternative energy’ ‘firms’.

Humphreys, in his paper, has only mounted a false excuse for what Ron Walker and Hugh Morgan seek; the ruination of coal fired plants, and additional massive capital destruction of many producers of other goods, in order to set up their grand swindle of nuclear generation of electricity. This is exactly what the CIS and IPA are leading up to.

It is blindingly obvious that is the objective because of a few simple facts. Windmills and ‘solar’ are totally useless for electricity generation. There is only one alternative to coal fired plants, nuclear power plants. Bingo! And the ugly mugs of those two parasitical scumbags emerge in full view: Hugh Morgan, Ron Walker, along with their leftist bed pals, Brumby, Bracks, and who else is behind their plan to once again defraud Australians of billions of dollars. Notice also, Bracks is now an ‘economic adviser’ to Rudd.

This is one plot the CIS and IPA are flying cover for. I am not saying that that is why Humphreys wrote the tripe he did. The question mark hangs over the CIS, which praised Humphreys’ deception on carbon taxes and co2 emissions to the hilt. Then, as set out above, there is Yates and Peony.

The Morality of the CIS and IPA

Let’s not overlook the gross immorality of both Humphreys and the CIS, and the IPA, in pushing positions that are hideous in the implications. Their morality is the same as that of Ron Walker and Hugh Morgan; they don’t give a stuff about the sheer carnage and immiseration of millions of Australians such vile positions entail. From Jackson’s article, one formed the strong impression Humphreys resents Jackson for his lucid demolition of what is a bad paper. I advise Humphreys of this:

What is truly objectionable is types like you advocating measures which are devastating in force, entail real cruelty against Australians, and are criminal in force. Types like you and your bosses in the CIS pretend to be free market economists and fighters, while in reality covering up for scumbags, and working out how to bludgeon modest Australians into the dust.

It’s worse. As we have seen, it turns out that at least one of the prinicpals of the CIS has a direct, vested interest in Governments imposing the highly destructive, wicked measure of ‘carbon credits and trading’.

Types like you put that little fat fascist called Kevin Rudd, and green guru Peter “ Corrupter of Youth” Garrett and his female Gaiae priestess Penny Wong onto the government benches. Types like you made scumbags such as Ron Walker wealthy men, out of stolen private property. Types like you have helped the Kennett - Stockdale and Bracks and Brumby Cabinets steal billions of dollars from Victorians through such deceptions as privatisation, instead of returning production to free market enterprise resting on unfettered private property rights. That is the morality of the IPA and CIS.

The claim man is causing global warming is a lie. It rests on lies and not science. First Coalition Ministers, now ALP Ministers under Kevin “Mussolini” Rudd are using the lies as an excuse to burden Australians with more regulations and smash capital. Those liars Bracks and Brumby lead the way, in punishing Victorians with windmill scams, and desalination plants (instead of letting free market entities build massive new dams), and other controls.

The Coalition ministers Kemp, Campbell and Turnbull joined in these criminal actions against Australians by setting up the ethanol scam. It’s a scam fully supported by driveling fools such as Andrew Bolt (another parrot for the racketeers behind the ethanol syndicates falsely called businesses). And the CIS and IPA are pushing for more ‘alternative energy’ swindles to be perpetrated by politicians and bureaucrats against Australians. At least one of the CIS’ principals is a direct beneficiary of these vile schemes. How many more in the CIS, and for that matter the IPA, have direct interests in the perpetration of these massive frauds?

They, the IPA, CIS, and the HR Nicholls Society are ‘defenders of Liberty’, and ‘Leading free market economists’? To use a good old ‘ockerism’, bullshit. But its worse than bullshit.

The pecuniary interests of Ron Walker, Hugh Morgan, Rudd and his Cabinet of “brownshorts”, Steve Bracks, and the CIS and its Yates and his Peony directorship intersect. This is what Humphrey so badly defended in his paper, an oligarchcy of rotters. This is the real reason for the existence of the IPA and CIS, to justify a pack of wealthy cretins trampling over Australians, as they get on with schemes the modest man would assume are merely the mad dreams of insane cleptomaniacs

Postscript.

Given the CIS’ interest in seeing Federal and States’ Govts. perpetrate massive frauds, using the total lie that Co2 emissions causes global warming as the excuse, it is clear why they had Humphreys attack Jackson’s demolition of their nasty ‘case’ for carbon taxes and ‘trading’, cowardice.

In view of his very bad paper, they must be as thick as two bricks to have Humphreys to cover their backsides by attacking Jackson’s solid rebuttal of their nonsense. Why did they have him do that? Did they believe that that way they wouldn’t be found out if they hid themselves in their bunker and sent boy Johnny out to exchange blows with Jackson?

If so, here we are, I have uncovered the most illuminiating revelations set out above. In that case, they haven’t been merely found out, they have been caught red-handed in their grotty act of deceit. A deceit papered over by a shabby attempt to conceal their disgusting, highly immoral conflict of interest.

Gee, if I could unearth the matter effortlessly, how many others have also discovered their ‘dirty little secrets’? The power of the internet seems to bamboozle them.

Didn’t it occur to them that in view of how bad his paper is, any attempt by Humphreys to rebut Jackson would only pulverise the slivers of glass from the window he smashed unaided in that paper? Apparently not. They at the CIS can rest assured, Humphreys has succeeded in throwing more bricks at the thoroughly shattered remains of their credibility.

Anyone who is a friend of Mr. Jackson might bring this article to his attention. On the strength of his news weekly, I believe he will find these revelations highly amusing.

The CIS caught red-handed.

One has been light with the postings because, amongst other things, one has been pursuing a couple of leads for what could be another scoop. I?m, not saying what at the moment, and it is up in the air as to whether anything comes of it. Yet, one does have hot fresh news as the tag to this post suggests. My mole in 104 Exhibition St., has apprised me of a black comedy , which is the latest development. The KKR is hurting and desperate to find a big hole to hide in. The second development is the case of X and Y, and the horrendous abuse being dealt them by X?s daughter, and the Bracks Junta,its commissars of VCAT, and its goons.

My mole in 104 Exhibition St., the Victorian Liberal Party?s headquarters for the information of readers not familiar with the import of that address, has apprised me of a black comedy and it is the latest development in the scandal of their treatment of Prodos Marinakis. The KKR is hurting and desperate to find a big hole to hide in.

My mole inside 104 Exhibition Street has furnished new information on the persecution of Prodos by the wreckers of the Victorian Liberal Party by the KKR and their backers. The new development has a ring of black comedy to it, Krogers? Kronies and Resurrectionists have been told by the Powers that Be to forget Prodos and leave him alone and make a conciliatory gesture toward Prodos. The answer to the question why is straightforward, the exposure of their vicious attacks on Prodos has not only embarrassed them, it is hurting them.

To repeat a previous observation, the KKR are ignorant thugs, who, in wrecking the party, enjoy inflicting pain on others. Being the gutless thugs and girlies that they are, they believe they can safely persecute anyone the Krogerites don?t like. The undesirables are any who hold Liberal convictions. They believe they are protected by the safety of their well-paid jobs in 104 Exhibition Street and the tin pot goddies they serve - the Powers that be. They believed they could smear and slander and persecute Prodos in secret and thus would not face anybody prepared to hit them back and do it in public.

No, not hitting them back in kind, unlike their character assassination of their moral superior Prodos. It is, instead, simply a matter of throwing punches with fists loaded with the knuckle dusters of fulsome disclosures of their actions and what those Krogerite glove puppets, who feed their faces in 104 Exhibition Street at the expense of Liberal Party members, are doing to members and the Party. That sound squelching over the net? It is the grunting and squeals of hogs in a trough given electric shock treatment.

While they enjoy inflicting pain, being the gutless girlies that they are, they can?t take pain and, they are hurting. Moreover, they have become an embarrassment to their masters, and their masters have told them to stop and crawl to Prodos and kiss and make up. The motive is clear enough, the powers that be are increasingly nervous about the exposure and coverage they are receiving on the savage persecution of Prodos, and the attached illumination of what they are doing to the Victorian Liberal Party, wrecking it while serving the Bracks Junta. They are hurting also because, the consequences of the vile and disgusting treatment of Prodos and the Richmond Branch and its members, is revealing them in public for the selfish, venal, capricious moral cretins that they are.

The Powers that Be can?t see the problem is not Prodos and the exposure of the disgusting conduct of the Krogerites, it is their Krogerite vassal slaves who are the problem. It is a problem the little goddies are as much responsible for as the Krogers are. And the problem is a manifestation of why it is a problem at all, the absence of solid Liberal principles and convictions in a small narrow clique who have taken control of the Liberal Party and treat it as their feudal vassal estate.

The Powers that Be seem to believe that if the vicious campaign against Prodos is stopped and a conciliatory gesture toward Prodos made that will be the end of the matter and the public scrutiny. With this, because of the power of the Internet, the public attention the KKR and their narrow clique of backers are receiving will cease too. There are several problems with what they presume.

The first problem is their motivation: they are hurting because of the public exposure. Readers will recollect the first revelation of the scandal I wrote up and which was published on Brookesnews, and follow up articles. The media have picked it up. In the Sunday edition of the Herald Sun (14/5/06), most of page 31,Opinion Extra, was dedicated to a feature to the state of the Victorian Liberal Party, featuring Prodos. It did not do justice to Prodos; to the contrary, Brendan Donohoe, who is the state political reporter for Channel Seven, made snide comments against Prodos.

Donohoe, however, did rate the Victorian Liberal for its glaring failure to attract members and, candidates who are prepared to stand and fight for seats. Donohoe doesn?t manage to pin why the Party is in a shambles but he doesn?t hesitate to call the state of the Victorian Liberal Party for what it is, a disgrace. Donohoe blunted the force of the point by rambling on about how much members of parliament are paid, reducing the argument to a lack of monetary incentive. This is rubbish but that aside, Donohoe’s article was just one more kick in the Krogerite groin.

Well, one will not cease covering the scandal, and not just because of the scandal, but because of the Krogerites’ treachery and their wrecking of the Party. One will not cease publishing new revelations exposing a pack of venal thugs who are a cancer in the Party.

The second problem is the presumption, if the scandal is brought to an end and Prodos is appeased, then it is business as usual, with the Krogerites still in place and the clique still in control of the Party. Well, it is exactly that which led to the persecution of Prodos. They are wrong.

Victorian Liberal Party members have had enough of being treated as vassal serfs and seeing Liberal principles betrayed and the upshot, the parliamentary wing corrupted by the Brahmins and their Krogerite stooges. They are disgusted at that wing?s efforts in supporting the police state `laws? of the Bracks Junta and for the ever increasing tax and squander on bureaucracies, `environmentalism?, windmill scams, train sets, the Commie Commonwealth Games, and goon squads, all of which entails only economic carnage.

Nothing better amplifies the damage done to the Party than the wing?s spinelessness and cowardice and betrayal of Liberal principles by their support for a long list of the Bracks Junta?s rotten measures. Absolutely shocking is their failure to assert the Rule of Common Law and, instead, the gutless pricks have supported such police state measures as the Blasphemy ?Law? and medieval witch sniffers? ?court?.

The KKR are deluding themselves if they believe ending the savage action against Prodos ends what is nothing less than a fight against a bunch of cowards, who wouldn?t recognise a liberal principle if it hit them in the face. No, it doesn?t end there, It ends when the Party is gutted of those treacherous wreckers and men and women of solid Liberal principles and convictions hold offices and stand as candidates, and run on those same convictions. That is when it stops.

The third problem is, they seem to believe Liberal members are, as they are, spineless, unprincipled, craven, morons. That?s evident enough, if they believe Prodos can be turned into another lackey of theirs by offering him a conciliatory gesture. A Gesture! Krogers? lackeys, Sheezel, Tony Barry, and Russell Hannan have used their positions and Liberal Part head office to mount a vile campaign against Prodos, and the Powers that Be believe all that is required is a load of socialist drivel delivered in a heart-to heart group hug-in.

More to the point is that they are assuming Prodos is behind what is hurting them. To this, they assume if Prodos can be bought, and he can not be bought, he will call off the `retaliation? I have a hot flash for them: Prodos has nothing at all to do with the exposure of their treachery and betrayal of Liberal members and the Victorian Liberal Party.

Prodos has never contacted me, nor sent me information, nor have I approached him. It is obvious that Prodos has adhered to the Party?s rules regarding confidentiality and silence on matters internal to the Party. Why, is lost on me and for no less a reason than Sheezel, Tony Barry, and Russell Hannan have exploited that in order to mount their attacks on Prodos.

They can rest assured, it?s not the end of the attention to their nasty ways; I won?t cease writing on it and broadcasting it over the Internet. It is not a matter of `tit-for-tat? retaliation either. It is a proper exposure of the conduct of moral cretins, their actions against Prodos, and what they and that typify. So, they can hide in their offices and keep on trembling. 104 Exhibition Street leaks faster than a colander absent of rice and this fact must have the KKR bent over vomiting into the toilets several times a day.

The last problem is, a ` gesture?, type - `conciliatory?, doesn?t quite make reparation for the smears, slanders, public campaign through the sniveling lefties at Crikey.com, and the star chamber inquisition, hurled against Prodos by Sheezel, Tony Barry and Russell Hannan. It doesn?t make up for such treachery against Prodos whose crime is; he holds Liberal convictions and is their moral superior as well. It doesn?t make up for their treatment of the members of the Richmond Branch. It doesn?t make up for their shear contempt for Liberal members and Victorians. It doesn?t make up for the KKR and their backers treating the Victorian Liberal Party as their feudal estate and, their wrecking of the Party, their treachery reflected in how well they have served and supported the Bracks Junta.

A gesture and conciliation are the wrong words. What will satisfy Liberal Party members is:

The Krogerite lackeys and glove puppets given the sack and flung out of 104 into the gutters.
The control of the clique over the Party killed off.
Appointments to executive offices of men and women who do hold solid Liberal principles, and unlike the current incumbents, are actually competent to execute the responsibilities and charges those positions entail.
Killing the Krogerite habit of coercing branches into dismissing candidates for seats in Parliament who firmly hold Liberal convictions and replacing them with spineless, unprincipled glove puppets.

It is not a matter of members exacting satisfaction. They are only a few items, which must be done now. More has to be done in order to rectify the Victorian Liberal Party .The Party has to be put it back into shape to not merely win elections, but make it fit to hold the Treasury Benches again. Right now, the Liberal Party is as fit as the ALP to do that, not at all.

In the meantime, the Powers that Be and their K.K.R. glove puppets are wailing, gnashing their teeth, vomiting into toilet bowls, their heads hurt and, stamping their feet,crying, ?We want the (thoroughly deserved) publicity to stop??. Gad, it?s funny. Those oh so tough, head kicking, nobodies and con men are crumpled up in agony because, truth hurts and truth will out. Well, they can keep screaming, for they are not hurt enough yet.

N.B.: A Liberal Party member, who fully understands what the KKR are, and what they are doing to the party, read the first article on the KKR?s actions against Prodos when it was published by Brookesnews. He mentioned to me ? I give them two weeks, at the most, and then they will break down crying their little eyes out.?? Well, that senior Liberal Party member has the measure of those types.

The case of X and Y

First, a few corrections to my last piece on X and Y are to be noted.
Having related X was assaulted by X’s daughters in the street, what the daughters did to X is far worse than I had related. Early one evening, as X walked to a mailbox from her residence, her daughters, with two female friends, followed X. to the mailbox. There, they together, the daughters and friends, bashed X and threw X to the ground. This assault opened up and accentuated an old, fine and small fracture in X?s hip. The gangsters then dragged X up and grabbed hold of X?s wrists and locked X?s up into X?s back and forced marched X back to X?s residence.

The daughters? defamation of Y, who is the spouse of X, is far more vicious than I had related.

This week, the case should have been concluded in a VCAT tribunal. It hasn?t been concluded, one of Bracks? commissars decided to extend what amounts to nothing less than a Kafkaesque trial of X. The trick Bracks? commissar used, was to reject the psychiatric report another VCAT commissar had ordered X to obtain for the VCAT persecution a while ago.

What was wrong with the psychiatrist?s report? It contained the wrong answer. The conclusion was a solid statement of X is sane The Commissar did not like that finding and ordered X to spend another $300 on another examination by another psychiatrist. One can imagine the Commissars in VCAT stretching the trial of X through the remainder of this year and into next year on the strength of simply rejecting each new psychiatry report.

Dickson, Bracks? goon in the Office of State Trustees, to recapitulate, seized X?s bank and superannuation accounts, siphoned out all the funds and closed the accounts. With X?s private property thus stolen by the Bracks Junta, Y is paying X?s bills and, Y is struggling to meet the now compounding financial burden, which has followed upon the Bracks confiscation of private property.

Franz Kafka?s, The Trial, is a black, bleak, surreal story. A man is subjected to the horror of being arraigned before a Star Chamber, for no crime at all. Scoundrels, with all the qualities of police state thugs, detain him at their whim. The Trial was banned in the U.S.S.R. because, for a work of fiction, it illuminated what `law? and trials in the U.S.S.R were with rare clarity.

VCAT is not a court of Common Law. VCAT amounts to nothing less than a kangaroo court in which commissars of the Bracks Junta enforce nothing more than the whim of tyrants. Amplifying what VCAT amounts to is the shocking enforcement of Bracks? totalitarian Blasphemy `Law?, against the two Pastors on the strength of nothing more than the Commissars in VCAT did not like what the Two Pastors did, told the truth about Islamo-nazism. How they set about snaring the two Pastors, by deliberately seeking out a couple of Muslims to enter private property and, seek some excuse to find that their feelings have been hurt by the truth. Brookesnews has fully covered the brutal, totalitarian actions of Bracks? goons against the two Pastors. The editor of Brooksnews went further.

The editor has not merely published statements in the Brooksnews magazine that are, according to the Blasphemy Act, hideous crimes, he directly wrote to Commissar Sisely and pointed out, as Sisely did against the Two Pastors, she must arraign the editor before the Kafkaesque VCAT Star Chamber. Sisely has not merely not done so, she has sent a snivelling excuse which contradicts the fact of her action against the Two Pastors. These matters are available to read on the Brooksnews website. Those who have followed the correspondence and the editor?s articles are fully apprised why the editor launched the challenge to VCAT, through Commissar Sisely and the Blasphemy ?Law?.

The Commissars of VCAT haven?t acted against the editor and the reason is obvious. The Commissars act only against those they believe are too weak to stand up to those, gutless, venal, Police state thugs. Lets? get this clear, as in The Trial, the `authority’ of types like that resides only in brute coercive force and police state thuggery. Without the Bracks Junta, the Commissars of VCAT would be in the gutters as the rotten unemployable dole bludging bums that they are. Thus we see them beating up:

The two Pastors and;

A sixty year old woman, who suffers multiple sclerosis, which has impaired only her eyesight and hearing.

The Commissar, who presided this week in the Kafkaesque Trial of X, seems to assume no-one would notice that Commissar?s thuggery, and that of the Commissar for admitting a case which in Common Law would have been rejected in the first few minutes of the first hearing, for admittance of the case, as entirely without merit, as only vile nonsense put out by two vile daughters.

How brave, how learned, just as the slimes that serve communists regimes are so brave. They must be brave, for who else but the brave would arraign and brutalise decent men and women, and in this case, a 60 years old woman who has multiple sclerosis?

The Commissars are no better than X?s daughters, who, aided by their savage friends bashed their 60 year old mother in a shopping strip, broke her hip and frog marched her back to her residence, and seized and threw down a staircase X?s husband.

In doing so, they are ably abetting the Commissar in the State Trustees Office and the Junta in their act of confiscation of X?s accounts.

Unbelievable, this is Australia, and yet we have a Junta, which, daily, commits actions worthy of the USSR or, otherwise, would be no more than a fiction in a surreal and black novel.

As for the gutless krogerites and one in particular, David Davis, who plague the Liberal Party, and have supported the Junta?s totalitarian Acts and actions, what has their response been? Silence, stony silence, nothing at all.

Having related X, as a constituent of David Davis, properly sought justice by contacting Davis as her M.P., David Davis has not taken up her case. Silence, the silence of another gutless, unprincipled, krogerite glove puppet, that has been is response. Well, what of Ted Baillieu? I hear crickets chirruping, and at it is the beginning of winter.

Last Friday, Ted promoted Davis to, Minister for the cult of the goddess of death, Gaia, as the `Minister for the Environment?. He has praised Davis for being a fine, decent, hard-working Liberal M.P. Ted must have been cracking a subtle joke, for Davis has not simply failed in his duty as an M.P. to a constituent. Davis is derelict in his duty to a constituent, who is being cruelly and brutally treated, not only by her daughters, but also by the Bracks Junta, its goons, and its commissars.

Ted, mate, that 60 year old woman, who has multiple sclerosis, and her partner, are being subjected to brutal thuggery, not just at the hands of the daughters, but at the hands of the Bracks Junta. And your pals in the Liberal Party are so unprincipled they have refused to do their duty. Well, given the krogerite lackeys under Doyle backed to the hilt Bracks? Blasphemy Act, I can understand why they won?t lift a finger on her behalf, for the gutless and treacherous lackeys supported the measure which befits only a totalitarian regime.

What are you going to do, Ted? Are you going to find spine and principle and stand up for the poor couple and with it, re-assert the Rule of Common Law and not the capricious tyrants? rule by diktat ? otherwise called regulation and that garbage called `made law?. What are you going to do Ted? Are you too going to betray Liberal principles or are you going to stand up, be a man, and fight for the couple and fight the Bracks Junta? Of course, it will be difficult Ted; you would also have to stand up to your sister, in view of her collusion with the Bracks Junta in leading the naked confiscation of property, the site of the former Portsea OCTU battle school.

The betrayal of X and Y by a Krogerite glove puppet typifies what the Krogerites have stuffed the Parliamentary wing with, and why it has not fought the Bracks Junta but has, instead, backed many of its rotten measures. It is another demonstration of why they have lost the 2006-election, rather than having eviscerated the Bracks Junta and not at this years polls, but years ago. Ted, that is what the man in the street sees and is talking about, the Liberal Opposition are not better than the Bracks Junta is, they are exactly the same, rotten. You can indulge in a happy - clappy socialist group hug in Ted, and you will continue to lose voters because of spinelessness and betrayal of Liberal principles, Ted.

Oh, I must add, X explained, in the Star Chamber, defence, so far , has been impossible. Daring to even begin an explanation provokes the Commissar into treating them as having committed some horrendous crime.A truly Kafkaesque wringer this poor couple are being put through, and, it is not over yet.