Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Silver Blaze.
An irregularity put Sherlock Holmes onto his quarry. A dog that always barked at strangers entering premises did not yap. It meant only one thing, Holmes deduced, the ‘beast’ was familiar with the culprit.
Why have ‘States’ and ‘Federal’ Liberal Party MPs not barked at the culprits of serious criminal matters? No, not because they are familiar with the culprits, though of some of them that is true. I am referring to:
1. “Shreddergate”
2. The criminal operation the Victorian Executive operates through the STO and OPA.
The second is the eye-opener. A thorough, fearless criminal investigation would drag in Jeff Kennett, Alan Stockdale, their Attorney General and any other ministers with responsibilities for the STO and OPA. It would also haul in their advisers party to what was set up, immediate and contracted. Thus also dragging in any from the IPA and CIS who might have supplied advice. It would drag in also Bracks, Brumby and Hulls and their advisers. Last, but not least, also officers in both the OPA and STO.
It explains why Liberal MPs refuse to do their duty by Victorians in these matters. It is not only because many victims are not Toorak Brahman, to whom the “Right” grovels.
Liberal MPs refusing to do their oath sworn duty to uphold the Rule of Common Law are not merely unprincipled cowards. They are protecting ‘colleagues’ and ‘friends’ – in the CIS and IPA too perhaps. These self-styled free market clunky tanks advised the Kennett Cabinet on many matters. The Kennett Cabinet altered the Acts pertaining to Wards of the State, and converted the STO into a pseudo-business, a shell company. The original objective was to float it on the stock exchange but the electoral danger staid their hand on this as also Bracks’ and Brumby’s hands. This was exactly the sort of snake oil the IPA and CIS supplied Kennett.
Kennett is no genuine free market Liberal. He himself declared recently, as advice to NSW Premier Lemma, privatisation means extracting greater revenues. That was the whole thrust of privatisation, taxing Victorians and not founding utilities as genuine free market entities by efficiently serving customers and thus lowering prices.
Another excuse for ‘privatisation’, also rooted in falsehoods purveyed as free market economics is ‘user pays’. The Executive taxes Victorians and punishes them again by charging them for what has been paid out of taxation. This wheeze is perpetrated by all governments in Australia and it is itself larceny. This was also part of the ’sound advice’ on which the conversion of the STO into a crime operation was based.
The conversion of Wardship into OPA was an overthrow of the original function, to uphold the real property rights of wards, in themselves and all their property. Prior to the Kennett novelty, anyone for whatever reason could declare themselves a ward of the State. This was the point to the use of very rubbery terms such as insanity or the updated equivalent ‘dementia’.
Such vague words had nothing to do with whether someone was totally ga ga or worse and thus incapable at all of running their own affairs. The buttress is Common Law and the King’s sworn oath to uphold it and to uphold the rights of any subject who approached the King for execution of this oath-sworn service. Wardship was the mechanism by which it was executed. In a stroke, the Kennett administration and their advisers wiped this out, and with it the rights of Wards and potential Wards.
Under the OPA regime imposed by the Kennett administration, they reduced Wards to their private property. Their freedom and dignity as individuals and all their other property rights were struck down. Bracks, Brumby and Hulls liked this wheeze so much, they eliminated any chance of any victim of the Executive of re-asserting their full rights.
Needless to say, the STO was an administrative charge to the taxpayer to meet the King’s duty bound service to subjects who sought it. The Kennett administration and their advisers struck this down when they converted the STO into a shell company. The only way for the straight administrative entity the STO, bound to execute the King’s oath bound duty, can make ‘profit’ is by larceny. It is committed on a large scale and by three measures:
1. Elderly people who named the STO their trustees, having reached a condition that requires exercise of trusteeship, have their accounts hoovered daily by the Victorian Executive through the STO. This alone is shocking, it is heinous and it is a major crime.
2. Through the OPA a financial administrative order is put out against a target. This means the target has all their lawful rights to their property and exercise there-of stripped. The STO exercises all the rights and targets are under the Act are forbidden to even utter a word to anyone about it. This is not a joke. It is what the Kennett Administration and their advisers devised and fully enjoyed also by Bracks, Brumby, Hulls.
3. Full Guardianship placed over targets. Targets have their rights in themselves and all their property seized in toto. It is completely illegal, it is a criminal offence for victims to speak out even in a court of law.
To secure 2 and 3, ‘dementia’ is the catchall. It has been redefined to mean a severe incapacitating disability. Victims have to go through hell and horrendous expense in the attempt to fight back. Bracks, Brumby and Hulls tightened the Act to ensure victims, while they may go to the expense; they have zero chance of succeeding. This was because of the lucky few who have succeeded.
VCAT is not a low cost ‘common law court’. It is the enforcer of the capricious and criminal ‘laws’ of the Executive, as the Blasphemy ACT is an infamous demonstration. However, there is a trick to it. VCAT act is an empty vessel.
VACT’s ‘authority’ rests on a bluff. The huff and puff of politicians and their agents, devolving on nothing more than the naked intimidation of Victorians. Only a bluff but an effective one, in view of the sheer numbers who have been cowered by it.
Propping up the above, as in so many other capricious ‘Acts’, is a small army of ‘law firms’ that have sprouted like weeds in spring. As we have already related in the case of Jennifer, conspiray between the STO and at least one law firm has been committed against at least one victim. They make a killing out of the horrendous abuse dealt out to targets.
‘Informers’ also serve the criminal actions of the STO and the OPA. The Blasphemy case is another example. They produce hearsay evidence on which the Executive ‘hangs’ its victims. As in the case of Jennifer, attempts to pervert the course of justice, include attempts at suborning witnesses. It’s all ok, for “it is the compassion of the “Knowers” who knows wots good, so lump it and sod off”.
Due process? In VCAT! It does not exist. Kafka’s The Trial not only sums up ‘justice’ under the USSR, it sums up what the victims of the Executive are put through - and not only under the Acts OPA, STO, and Blasphemous.
Targets
Yes, ‘targets’. As HEROC, Sisel, and Szoke against the two Pastors, the OPA and STO hunt for targets to trap. It requires the co-operation of various types such as the above. This is systematic, and the parties to these arrangements are relentless and the sadistic aspect of it all shows through, as we have so far documented in the case of Jennifer and Peter.
Jennifer and Peter are only two of very many Victorians who have been caught in the dragnet. Heaven only knows how many more have since been trapped and now being put through the same hell. It is important to stress, one victim is missing and it is probable dead.
Those close to this victim are naturally deeply upset, worried, and angry at the criminal bastards responsible.These bastards had a future but it was in the past. Not to worry, evin “Mussolini” Rudd is paving a new one for them.
The Dog did not bark
Not the genuine Liberal Party, but those who have taken control of the Liberal Party and their MPs have suppressed investigations into such matters. They are protecting themselves and this is why they have not barked against Goss, his Cabinet, his Chief of Staff Kevin Rudd and other ALP figures. It is why Beattie with impunity flung Balson into prison (Balson relates on his site - the hideous crime of reporting the facts of Shreddegate as they emerged.
The Left dominated media reinforced the suppression by both sides, as Balson also documented. This is typical of the lying, left dominated media. The media lied to protect also Rudd. At bottom, unprincipled types in the Liberal Party closed ranks with the ALP, while Beattie, a University, and a newspaper took revenge against any who dared expose what the Executive under Goss and his Chief Kevin Rudd did.
Having given one excellent reason as to why the Liberal Dog did not bark, another is:
Statism, with the complements ‘positive law’, as opposed to the Rule of Common Law, and the false assertion the Executive is above the Rule of Common Law (I refer readers back to the distinguished Judges and QCs who condemned this falsehood). Given the rate at which not only ALP but also various Liberal administrations have supplanted common law with ‘positive law’, they have made this plain. Indeed, the excuses for Liberal MPs in the Victorian Parliament, imposed by the likes of Kroger, Costello, Kennett and their backers, have been open about this. They went further under Kennett, Napthine, Doyle and Baillieu:
Kennett’s crew drew up the anti-Bill of Rights, inclusive of the clause that makes it a criminal offence for any Victorian to take the final and expensive recourse of preserving their inalienable rights against the Executive through the High Court of Australia. They were denied the pleasure of imposing it; it went to Steve Bracks and Rod Hulls.
Examining the time frame, it is very likely they also drew up a draft for the Blasphemy ‘Law’. Tack on what they did with the OPA and STO, and their subsequent full support for Bracks over the two totally anti-rights Bills, and what pops up? A lawless Executive.
Parliament is itself a court of common law to fight for any depredations of the Executive against those they are supposed to serve, through upholding Common Law. Look around States’ and Federal parliaments and consider what is the case. Upper and lower Houses, each Parliament shredding common law and rights of each Australian, and that includes firms, as opposed to shell companies - inclusive of the larceny ‘alternative energy’ scams.
Such is the degradation, the Liberal Dog did not bark because those strangling it wired the Liberal Dog’s jaws shut tight a long time ago. Thus they do not oppose even the falsehood Co2 emissions causes ‘climate change’ and what is tacked onto it:
The imminent economic ruination of Australians under Rudd, to be effected through sweeping coercive measures that will be called ‘Law’. Absolutism unfolding before our very eyes.
The Liberal Party has not been corrupted. It is unprincipled types that, having obtained a death grip over the Party, have discredited it and what it stands for, genuine free markets and Liberalism. Thus they have suppressed any within the Party who they recognise as a threat to their grip. Thus, as we shall relate, they ensure advice is obtained from ‘trustees’ - including the mendicants of the IPA and CIS. These two dung heaps ably assist the thugs in smearing genuine Liberals, and in suppressing anything they find embarrassing to themselves ( the joke is, it fails every time). The admixture of pride, hubris, venality, cowardice and ignorance is their quality and this cocktail is called stupidity:
Stupid types are callous, cruel and destructive. So long as they are confined to their own interests, they damage only those close to them. However, my God! When they are let loose on things of general force and can impact the lives of many, they can and frequently do unloose Hell. Thus as the above. Thus will Kevin “Mussolini” Rudd. These types can run to befuddled clerics who can reassure them, they are “fine, fine, fine christians” and this, as indicated in the item immediately below, assuredly they are not.
[The remarks on OPA, STO, with reference to Jennifer and Peter serve also as instalment in what remains to be completed, the account of their case.]
An Open Letter to, Mr. Steve Edwards, associate of the CIS.
Sir, if you assumed one had dropped a certain exchange, be corrected. One only saved the continuation for a more interesting context and this is it.
I read, back then, your savage attacks against Bracks, his Blasphemy Law, and defence of the Two Pastors and the rights of Victorians. I fell of my chair in a fit of laughter. It was a mistake, Edwards, linking them and it compounded the first nonsense, your declaration - “I wrote under the auspices of the CIS”. A few pedantic points:
- Spitting from a steel bolted bunker isn’t courageous.
- When, to repeat, does fighting for real causes and anything at all requires writing under the auspices of any entity? Mr. Balson has had a few things to say that are also rather germane to the odd notion you put.
-Very few bother reading the CIS magazines and IPA magazines. It can also be observed, very few bother reading such ‘opinion columns’ in the newspapers. Just as well, because as in, eg., Berg’s disgusting piece on Gueverra, many would crack up over another comedy script. It’s enough the likes of Bolt and Albrechtsen continue to cause great damage over many grave matters.
-While you hid in your steel bunker, there are those in Victoria who risked imprisonment. They weren’t in the IPA, nor the HR Nicholls Society. Not one of these uprightly supine chaps uttered a peep against Bracks et al. Come to it, neither have they attacked Islamo-fascism - to the contrary, they’ve extolled it viz the Berg-Kemp IPA rubbish.
No, it was un-funded sods who did go for them. Let’s name them:
Prodos, and Mr Jackson; oh and also Mr. Farris QC. Jackson startled me with a daring approach.
Mr. Cambria ensured the witch-sniffing HEROC was fully apprised of Mr. Jackson’s hideous violations of the Blasphemy Law. On reflection, it was a brilliant set-up. Jackson skewered them and they knew it. Better, and this reinforces a point above, it drew out the fact; HEROC and VCAT are nothing more than skeleton hulks set up by fatuous statists and run by those dreaming of neo-Marxist nirvana.
On observing Jackson’s actions, unlike Edwards’ estimation of his own spirited defence, I wrote mine down as lacking the same fearless dash despite violating the law rather extensively.
Then there is the fine example of Balson. This raises a trivial concern: What exactly is it about Edwards’ efforts that he should boast and compare himself with anyone who goes out into the open to fight good causes, those who dare do something? And, the efforts of his chums?
Now, Mr. Edwards, what is also essential about all that is related above?
I am assured of one thing, one has not heard a peep out of Edwards and his chums. The brigade of gumless and debarked geriatric poodles, zooms along on paw propelled doggy zimmer frames. No wonder they are in the Kitty Kennel clubs called CIS, IPA and HR Nicholls Society.
Secondly:
The cowardice of the Right wing tanks, and journalists. Let’s take Bolt and Blair as examples. They stick their fingers up diseased Leftists’ nostrils and completely ignore diseased Rightists. Yet, even agaisnt the Left, how brave are they? They said zero on the affairs and the culprits Balson wrote up.
Edwards is stumped, given his previous special pleading (“I was there, I was, I was….” - ad nauseum) as to what all the above discloses. It’s spell out the bleeding obvious time. In the article, a few points of interest were put. Speech is action, reasoning and so forth. Taken with what has been laid out above:
It’s not simply the diseased Left who cannot but ceaselessly reveal themselves in their actions. The “Right” do the same. They can pretend no one sees and none hears what they do and so what they are. Amazing! It’s like hiding a ruddy great big elephant under a pebble.
What hurts them is anyone stating the fact of the matter. They don’t give a stuff about the damage they cause, the lives they have ruined, and the lives they will have helped to ruin –through, e.g., Rudd’s Greeny progrom and related measures.
No, what makes them unhappy is someone with the gall to utter a few home truths. Recollect readers, for example, that that was the only concern of Kroger, his backers, and his lackeys when one merrily tapped on about their thuggery against Richmond Branch, Prodos, and trampling over many other branches. The smears they related to Crikey.com and how they grovelled before its retarded, Leftist inmates. How they seized control of the Liberal Party via stacking the Administrative Council and re-writing the Constitution.
Their compassion: them, them and their fat wallets. When they bleed, fairies blow their noses and dumb oafs cry. You can tell. Look at Peter Costello wailing “ I must leave Parliament for commerce to make my fortunes” . I’m reminded of the Dictator’s Song , Evita’s “Don’t cry for me Argentina”. Either this, or little bleeding Oliver Twisted Boy. The effect is spoiled somewhat, because Peter has realised the blooming obvious, no real company is mad enough to pay him $multi-millions per annum. He’s incapable of anything that warrants a fraction of it.
That is what they fight for. The above in this article is further demonstration of it. Voters see all this. It simply doesn’t register with the “Right” how from bad to shockingly unconscionable much of what they do is. Then, unlike the Left, the “Right” presume upon the peasantry.
It is telling what exactly it is that Mr. Edwards does defend and whom he actually defends. For some odd reason, ‘repeated cover up’ occurs, so I’ll type it just in case it means anything.