Kevin Rudd’s new way, Corporativa and Zwangswirtschaft
Thursday, August 7, 2008
Tony Blair coined the expression, “Third Way”. The trouble is, it isn’t new and neither is “New Labour”. Mussolini and his chums got in first. They called it “coporativo”. The undergraduate textbook steeped in some devestating economic fallacies bound “Right”, have caused extensive damage. They paved the way for Rudd and his Cabinet of imitators of nasty habits. Yet, there is also an element of Zwangswirtschaft involved.
It is impossible to stop giggling at the Centre of Indendent Studies. A warning must be issued to all who might bother with their bilge. Come to this, also the IPA’s and HR. Nicholls Society’s comic scripts for children. This is how I managed to break a rib. Some of their papers are so hilarious, I managed to hit a rib on the arm of the chair. They would be funnier if these village idiots were not wrecking good causes.
The biggest joke is; they pride themselves on being experts on Hayek. To indicate how bad they are, if they were they would be Austrian school economists. They are clueless in it.
If they were well read they wouldn’t say, for instance, Hayek influenced von Mises; it was the reverse. Secondly, Hayek was already an economist before he met Mises and was influenced by him. They do not even recognise an ‘Austrian’ argument when it is put before their peepers. Safe in their hubris, they even smear a fine economist in Mr.Jackson of Brookesnews, who has delivered devestating criticism of their pseudo-free market economics output, from ‘Austrian’ reasoning.
Between them, the “Right”, including Peter Costello, whom the HR. Nichs. Soc. fetes on their website as a Nobel Laureate in Economics and the most distinguished Jurist in the history of Common Law… darn, I’ve cracked another rib. These prize pillocks have not merely severely damaged free markets and economics of. In their insouciant crashing around in an intellectual china shop, they have only made those out to destroy free markets seem creditable.
Needless to say, incapable of defending free markets, they are fully aware that if they dared to treacherous Leftists would have a fun time exposing them for the empty balloons that they are. They pop and deflate rapidly.This is what happened when they pretended to run the otherwise solid and thus highly moral case for Labour Market Reform. This is why cretins have a free time in the public arena, as typified by a Lefty ignoramus called John Ralston Saul, as Jackson related in:
Ralston Saul: Nonsense from an anti-market ideologue
Saul is confused over corporativa, and so are the living dead “Right”. Jackson isn’t. Neither was von Mises.
The Centre for Independent’s Studies Megaglorious Professor in Hayek, not only errs in asserting Hayek influenced von Mises. Nicholas Gruen in, Much to learn from Hayek on efficiency, declared:
Hayek theorised, quite rightly that central planning is a dysfunctional way to run an economy, that markets are much better at using the local information that central planners cannot be aware of and have minimal incentives to take advantage of.
The Austrian school made no such mistake. They stressed central planning, the original 19th century word for socialism, is impossible. It was von Mises who famously hit Marxists hard, crumpled them up, with his pungent phrase, “Planned Chaos”. Hayek’s statement of this is:“ rational economic activity is impossible in a socialist commonwealth”.
Not content with cocking up these basic points, Gruen proceeded to a grander effort in destruction. He asserted large firms are socialist ‘organisations’. Coase nailed why this is false, in his
The Firm, the Market and the Law (1990); the market resolves optimal planning in firms. Mr. Jackson cited Coase in a devestating item on,
Anti-merger laws are bad for the Australian economy, Mr Barnaby Joyce
Who else blunders, viz Coase and other matters? Oh, No! Ken Phillips and his atrociously idiotic “Master-Servant” paper. Gruen “guesses” those in large firms haven’t read Hayek. Maybe so, but it’s better than a guess Gruen hasn’t read him, neither have his CIS, IPA and HR Nicholls Soc. pals, and nothing much else either.
It is to Von Mises’ tight, sparklingly clear, Planned Chaos (1947), that we turn.
Corporativo
“Benito Mussolini, the outstanding man in Italian socialism, chose at first the orthodox Marxian position. Nobody could surpass Mussolini in Marxian zeal. He was the intransigent champion of the pure creed…
“As in all other European countries, most of the Marxians longed for war and conquest…
“The program of the Fascists, as drafted in 1919, was vehemently anti-capitalistic. The most radical New Dealers and even communists could agree with it.
“Its shining leader, the peerless Duce, was called to find the ultimate solution for the burning problems of society’s economic organization and of social justice.
“From the dustheap of discarded socialist utopias, the Fascist scholars salvaged the scheme of guild socialism. Guild socialism was… so impracticable that it disappeared very soon from socialist literature. No serious statesman ever paid any attention to contradictory and confused plans of guild socialism. It was almost forgotten when the Fascists attached it to a new label, and flamboyantly proclaimed corporativism as the new social panacea.
“They called corporazione the compulsory organizations of the various branches of industry which were the administrative units for the execution of the German pattern of socialism they had adopted…
“Fascism was not, as its advocates boasted, an original product of the Italian mind. It began with a split in the ranks of Marxian socialism… Its economic program was borrowed from German non-Marxian socialism and its aggressiveness was likewise copied from Germans, the Alldeutsche or Pan-German forerunners of the Nazis. Its conduct of government affairs was a replica of Lenin’s dictatorship. Corporativism, its much advertised ideological adornment, was of British origin. The only home-grown ingredient of Fascism was the theatrical style of its processions, shows and festivals.”
Corporativo is being advanced by the Rudd Cabinet, through the extensive plans to make Australians Kyoto compliant. It is not only Co2 taxes that they are preparing to ram down.
Zwangswirtschaft
“…seemingly and nominally, maintains private ownership of the means of production, entrepreneurship, and market exchange. So-called entrepreneurs do the buying and selling, pay the workers, contract debts and pay interest and amortization. But they are no longer entrepreneurs. In Nazi Germany they were called shop managers or Betriebsführer. The government tells these seeming entrepreneurs what and how to produce, at what prices and from whom to buy, at what prices and to whom to sell. The government decrees at what wages laborers should work, and to whom and under what terms the capitalists should entrust their funds. Market exchange is but a sham. As all prices, wages and interest rates are fixed by the authority, they are prices, wages and interest rates in appearance only; in fact they are merely quantitative terms in the authoritarian orders determining each citizen’s income, consumption and standard of living. The authority, not the consumers, directs production. The central board of production management is supreme; all citizens are nothing else but civil servants. This is socialism with the outward appearance of capitalism. Some labels of the capitalistic market economy are retained, but they signify here something entirely different from what they mean in the market economy….
“The system of the hampered market economy, or interventionism, differs from socialism by the very fact that it is still market economy. The authority seeks to influence the market by the intervention of its coercive power, but it does not want to eliminate the market altogether. It desires that production and consumption should develop along lines different from those prescribed by the unhindered market, and it wants to achieve its aim by injecting into the working of the market orders, commands and prohibitions for whose enforcement the police power and its apparatus of coercion and compulsion stand ready….
“The Nazi plan was more comprehensive and… pernicious than that of the Marxians. It aimed at abolishing laissez-faire not only in the production of material goods, but no less in the production of men. The Führer was not only the general manager of all industries; he was also the general manager of the breeding-farm intent upon rearing superior men and eliminating inferior stock. A grandiose scheme of eugenics was to be put into effect according to “scientific” principles.”
“The slogan…[for their] their economic philosophy… Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz (i.e., the commonweal ranks above private profit)… [is also] the idea underlying the American New Deal and the Soviet management of economic affairs. It implies that profit-seeking business harms the vital interests of the immense majority, and that it is the sacred duty of popular government to prevent the emergence of profits by public control of production and distribution.”
In Australia, the term used by the decrepit “Right” and the diseased Left is neither “the majority”, nor “the collective”. They chosen an infantile substitute to say the same thing, “the community”, which stretches, expands, deflates, and shrinks according to what the wheeze is.
Community rhymes with the sound cows make,
“Commoooooooooooonity”
This gels nicely with the resurrection of the cult of nature and the slogan proudly shouted by cretinous MPs busy blowing up the Liberal Party, “We are all beasts”.
The above will be brought to bear in lifting out Rudds old socialist ‘plans’ in further items. For now, it is enough to note the living beast mummies of the “Right”, and their sterilised to death ‘free market tunker tanks” paved the way for Rudd’s atavism. Oh, it wasn’t becuase they deliberately laid foundations for it. It was because they don’t have a sputtering candle between them to shed light up these grave matters.
History begins each morning when they emerge out of a good night’s undisturbed sleep.
The History of economics begins as soon as they can invent their newest gag they offer in the name of free market economics [bother, does the rib hurt and how]. Chris Berg and Andrew Kemp demonstrated this perfectly - Islam and the Free Markets. They are typical of the completely dumbed down dumbkopf “Right”.
Ah: Peter Costello a bright spark. For once I could laugh along yesterday evening with Paul Keating (blimming heck was this a shock). He popped the ‘balloon’ with a nicely delivered one-liner.