In a reply to a reader, Louis observed:
Subject: CO2 on Mars
Posted by: Louis Hissink
Date: 9/6/2005
Franke Ashe
Sure, mars has little atmosphere, but 95% CO2, so one should see, relatively, some so called greenhouse effect. Earth has 0.03% CO2, and it has negligible effect. Water is the greenhouse component.
The statistic for Mars is the equivalent of a couple of truck loads, or rather more, of dynamite blowing up the the Co2 assertion of the boosters of, `man causes climate change’. It adds to what scientists, as opposed to charlatans, have set out on the matter of Co2.
Some articles linked by Louis, are pertinent to the post below:
How’s the Weather?
Like most sciences, meteorology still considers the Earth to be an isolated body in space. It is not. It is a charged body moving through an active plasma environment, surrounded by a web of electric currents commonly called the magnetosphere. Earth’s surface and atmosphere are electrically connected through this magnetosphere to electrical conditions in space and on the Sun. Astronomers Sallie Baliunas and Willy Soon have shown that for as long as temperature records have been kept, the global temperatures of the Earth have correlated to the sunspot cycle. And the sunspot cycle also affects radio transmission and power grids.
The Electric Universe identifies more effects: Currents to the surface affect the jet streams, moving them closer to the equator when solar activity causes geomagnetic storms. These currents power thunderstorms, waterspouts and hurricanes.
Another,
Mar 30, 2005Tornadoes as Electric Discharge
Because the Earth is a small charged body moving in a large cell of plasma, explanations of all physical phenomena in, on, and near the Earth must take the electrical behavior of plasma into account. Taking this larger picture into account will add new insights for understanding details of everyday phenomena, such as the weather.
Meteorologists are not sure how tornadoes form but they do know that they are often associated with severe electrical storms. The key to understanding tornadoes is that they are the result of rapidly rotating electric charge. Just as electrons are the current carriers in the copper wires we use for power transmission…
The links are of a site which contain more on the subject.
Plasma theory is sound, it’s elegant, satisfying Occam’s razor, and, the implications are amazing, in the best sense of `amazing’, a real frontier in science, and here is one of the possibilities that is opened up because, `Earth… is not. It is a charged body moving through an active plasma environment’
Its [ a hurricane’s fury] could be softened and split. Part could follow the usual pathway up the hurricane corridor as gentle rain and the other part could be diverted to the Sahara. North Africa could become a major producer of grains and fruits and vegetables; its coastline a Mediterranean holiday paradise.
A prospect maybe, but it is no fantasy , unlike that of the of `puppetteer’ booster’s fantasies which, sadly, so many govts. are willing to sack so many in order to indulge them.
It is easy to spot why religionistos, including socialistos, find science appalling, it is an optimist’s interest and, the optimism is fully warranted. Compare, socialistos find the classical economic tradition ( typified by the Austrian School) appalling for the same reason, it also fuels well founded optimism, and thus they cling to the hocus pocus of Keynes.
Sanity, reason, advance are anethema to the religionistos who are not simply in the midst but are in cabinet, parliament, and bureaucracy. Religionistos have every incentive to reduce, at least periodically, many to destitution, misery and dependency, for they are the only things which gives them the leverage to stay on top. No wonder that, they welcome the apocalyptists of the greeny inspired sub-occult of man causes global warming and their quackery paraded as science. Better to have many reduced to gibbering , infantile, fools, than mature adults, is it not Senator Campbell? the daft senator might ponder an example of some-one reduced to gibberish because of hocus pocus equated with science:
Subject: CO2 on Mars
Posted by:
Date: 9/14/2005
Louis, where is the evidence there is no warming effect of the CO2 on Mars. It’s there, but Mars is still cold. Anyway, given the relative density of the Earth and Martian atmospheres, the effective CO2 columns above the surface aren’t much different.
The correspondent, whose name is deleted for self-evident good reason, is a cot case.
In another article, Mr. Hissink sets out, there is no such thing as a `greenhouse gas’. I was staggered by the article because, Louis stated the blindingly obvious, of course there is no such thing as a `greenhouse gas’, it’s ordinary grip level science yet, a telling fact which, so far, from memory has not been stated until Hissink put pen to paper. Just shows how ugly the Man Causes it Case is when even the simplest facts are missed - there is n additional point to it, the charltans, the politicians and the medja have corrupted language and that, as many have pointed out and often enough, is worse than insidious, as the inculcation of the puppetteer dogma and the substitution of hocus pocus for science clearly demonstrates.
Just what is a Greenhouse? Is there such a thing as a greenhouse gas?
By Louis Hissink Email / Print