Mangled Thoughts

Obama is the United State’s Hugo Chavez. And an ignorant, oily, blowhard who had only two things going for him. He appealed to the treacherous, Castro and Islamo fascist hugging Leftists in the Democrats Party. He is going to reduce Americans to a living nightmare and this is all too transparent in his ‘policies’.

If anyone else did what he and the lying club of socialist cultists are perpetrating, they’d  be thrown into prison. And, if anyone else has done what central banks have perpetrated, and what successive Victorian Cabinets have committed, and what Rudd, Swann and Penny Wong are bringing down, they’d be thrown into a prison cell and the key thrown away down the sewer, lost forever. Sadly, in Australia, the Right has done much to advance criminal ‘policies’.

I  cannot but laugh each time I hear Costello boast of how he and his fellow Liberal Party wreckers have fought for Liberty. The joke is funnier when recollecting Costello’s and Michael Kroger’s account of their heroic actions as undergraduates against the hard left. ‘Airbrushing’ isn’t a good look for these two slimes. Let’s recount the historical facts, just for a jolly good belly laugh; it’s Friday after all.

When Peter was an undergraduate, he started out as a member of the Monash University ALP club. He was no Liberal then, and he is no Liberal today. Other ALP members of the club called him names, because, at a good estimation, Peter couldn’t get his way. This was unfortunate, because he and his pal Kroger inflicted themselves on the Liberal Party.

Peter cried crocodile tears and complained to ALP machine heavies, and demanded they spank the Party poopers. The gown-ups  gave him a hanky and told him to nick off. He did. At a boozey ’stooodent ooonion’ barbecue of a piss up, the ALP club members gave Costello and Kroger what for, for being a pair of whining cretins who couldn’t get their own way and then ratting. The Liberal ’stoodent ooonion’ Party welcomed them because, no doubt, they recognised in these two brats types just like themselves, and its been that way ever since.

So, Costello and Kroger airbrushed what did transpire. Every Leftist heavy knows it and rolls about laughing each time it is told; an oldie but it’s still one of their favourite jokes.

The Costello-Kroger version is that they were not only engaged in hard intellectual war against the Left, but they risked life and limb. It was real, old fashioned physical violence. They were the equal to someone who literally risked his life against genuinely violent, hard Left thugs, B.A. Santamaria.

Not to be outshone, The HR Nicholls Society held a dinner commemorating the fall of the Berlin Wall, how they destroyed it all by themselves. Oh, darn, Kroger and Costello are founding members of that club of buffoons. Yet, there is genuine competition between them. Unbelievable. Oh, competition in what? The heroism stakes, that’s what:

In a speech to the HR Nicholls Society - why do they bother, they all blather the same rubbish. Oh, I know, each likes to be a star and outshine Lord Olivier or Sir John Gielgud. What are two great Shakespearean actors against the poise and dramatic voices of The Village Idiots Vaudeville Troupe?

Ah yes, in said speech, David Kemp praised the heroism of his fellow, ‘gung-ho’, battle hardened combat warriors but managing to point himself up as the best of them. He is outstanding. Here it is, readers, in black and white:

Tenth Anniversary Conference, The Occasional Address, David Kemp

I am honoured to have been invited by Ray Evans to speak to this tenth anniversary dinner of the H.R. Nicholls Society…

It has been a particularly satisfying Society to belong to, not merely because it has had such remarkable success with its agenda of reform—though some here may think that success has so far been inadequate—but because it creates such consternation among one’s political opponents when they discover that you are a member of the H.R. Nicholls Society.

In the Parliament it still causes that frisson of fear to ripple around the Labor benches.

It gives me the same thrill as barracking for Carlton in the Collingwood stand at Victoria Park.

It is hard to believe that the Society is an organisation which holds peaceful seminars and publishes papers.

After all, no seminar group could have the apparent influence, and blanch so effectively the face of any ACTU Executive member as the H.R. Nicholls Society did. And still does today. It gives me great delight to wear my H.R. Nicholls Society tie into the House of Representatives, and wave it at poor old Martin Ferguson and Simon Crean…

It has been the awareness of that response by those who have defended the system of privilege and elite power supported by the ACTU that has made the H.R. Nicholls Society such a fearsome and feared opponent. But even a debate where victory for one side may be written in the stars cannot be won without champions, and it has been the courage of those who founded this Society and pressed ahead with the case for freedom in the workplace, who rightly receive our praise at this tenth anniversary conference.

That, readers, is only one of many reasons why the hard Left call the Right “pompous asses” and on this count let’s finish Kemp off properly. In the speech he boasted of millions of Australians are reverently and eternally grateful to them, and for representing them. Yes, so successful and so respected, and the “silent majority” such obedient serfs to this lot that they picked up their pitchforks and booted them out of office in 2007.

The Left not only roll about laughing at this lot, they send them up to their faces. Kemp believes hard leftists tremble at his approach, and sweat fear when they see the HR Nicholls Society’s badge of courage pinned to his chest. Now, as every jester knows only too well, the thing to do to conceited, humourless, dim-witted clowns whose bravery consists of holding an office by which they can freely intimidate others is to ham it up.

Jesters approach such types mimicking all the signs of fear Kemp claims to see in Leftist heavies. You know the trick:

The jester drops/tightens the jaw; squints the eyes, trembles the lips, and drops a knee to effect the cowed and beaten look.

Naturally, timing is everything. It is essential to launch it on a stage with a large audience present; this requisite is guaranteed in Parliament House. It definitely works, I vouchsafe it because I’ve pulled it myself: the pompous ass in question was deaf to the titters and laughter of an appreciative audience.

Now, it’s horrible to do this, to relate the bare, cold truth. However, and the duty pains me, it is time to disabuse Kemp of his heroic fantasies. Ditto, his brother Robert Kemp, who would during the Howard years, with a Coalition majority in the Senate, swagger in, sneer and make ad hominem cracks against the Left’s Senators. This was Senator Robert Kemp’s notion of fighting the Left, argument and debate. Otherwise his speeches were typical of the Right, numbingly vacuous.

When it was clear the Liberal Party was gone, and it was plain by 2005 they were defeated in the 2007 election, there was a happy note to the disaster caused by that lot. I took a bet on:

On the first day of the new, Left dominated Senate with an ALP President, Robert Kemp would swagger in as usual, throw out his usual loud-mouthed sneers, cheap cracks and general abuse and, the ALP would joyfully commence humiliating him, roused on by a chorus of hilarity.

He delivered in good form and they did. The President let Kemp sling a few lines and then told him to shut up and sit down. When Kemp opened his gob again, the Senator gave him another bollocking. It took the wind right of Kemp, and his smug smile fell faster than led and he couldn’t hide deep in the leather fast enough from  the ALP senators  rolling about in their seats laughing uncontrollably.

Gad it was hilarious and, best of all folks, the Right that hold all Victorian seats in the Senate give the Left a good laugh each day it sits, a belly-aching laugh. It is  hilarious listening to that lot because they really believe they are inflicting pain. Ah, they are, laughter can be painful. Helen Kroger excels at inflicting pain:

“Can the Minister guarantee the armed forces will receive their slouch hats this year?”

Now, I was crumpled up as it was but then I caught a snatch of this genius saying:

“And undies.”

It’s very difficult, readers, listening when the listener is drowning out the speaker. But I caught another word, “socks”.  Some readers can recollect that in relating how the Kroger gang did the routine (Helen’s ‘candidacy’ for the seat was rubber stamped by the branch selection committee), I stated with certainty that in the Senate she would leave the script she’s told to parrot and, believing herself formidable, open her mouth and the House would collapse in a gale.

The retarded cretin is so dense that as one no-nonsense, restrained silver-back said, “When she enters a room, the heating has to be turned up.” I dispute the gentleman’s claim. It is, uncommonly unfair of him to the lady and her talent. Chivalry demands she be praised fulsomely, to the hilt of her gifts. Helen Kroger ices polar ice caps and plunges the tundra into the winter freeze.

Wall Street Journal slams the diseased Democrats and “Hugo” Obama “Chavez”.

The article:

The Cap and Tax Fiction

Democrats off-loading economics to pass climate change bill

WSJ,  26/06/09

Change a few names and it could be the WSJ knifing the CIS and Greg Lindsay.

There is one problem in the article that blunts the proper evisceration of carbon taxes:

The hit to GDP is the real threat in this bill…

The consumption fallacy. There is no consumption before production. Concern over how much it will cost consumers not only understates by a tremendous factor the cost of carbon taxes but misses the essential point.  Business spending is 2/3 of total spending, this is the crucial figure and it squares with what should be obvious. Before consumption can occur, consumption goods have to be produced, and before this can be done, capital goods have to be produced and this is not a single stage matter either -

Capital goods to produce capital goods. Capital goods for capital goods to produce raw materials to be converted into materials needed for fabrication of capital goods.

Carbon taxes destroys this complex production structure. Once this is destroyed, where on earth are consumption goods to be obtained, from elves?

It should be transparent. After all, companies work with this every day but what do we see palmed off as sound economics in the mainstream? Nothing about capital. It, apparently, just exists. Accordingly, economic activity is at best two phased - final capital goods and consumption goods, and yet even this silliness begs the question.

It is the  garbage the Right and the CIS and IPA have pumped out in the name of economic theory and analysis. Making it funnier is when the IPA’s and CIS’ claim to be free market think tanks and warriors because the claim means capitalism and these two clunker tanks are blanks.

Best of all, the CIS claims to be expert s on Hayek, but this means Austrians school economists. It means Austrian school capital theory and they don’t have a clue about it at all. Their scribblings vividly demonstrates this fact, sharpened by the sheer infantile, unadulterated muck their ‘output’ is. They are on the same planet as the HR Nicholls Society, the planet of organ grinder monkeys.

The WSJ committed a bad mistake in an otherwise good article. It lets those who are about to wreak great carnage off the hook. On the Australian scene, it is one of many reasons why the hard Left are on top, and why the Greens are beginning to eclipse the Liberal Party as a major Party - certainly in Victoria. That is the rotten, hard fact of the matter; the Greens can be destroyed on the count of capital theory alone and what do we see from the Right

1. Stupidity reinforced by ignorance and half wits pretending to be economists. No bloody clue at all.

2. The Right supports the Greens cult and carbon taxes. Two of their starlets are Malcolm Turnbull and and one of Kroger young tyro toadies, Greg Hunt, as the rubbish they spout makes very plain. Liberals, defenders of the Free Market… lying thugs need to corrupt language.

This is what pretends to be warriors for Liberal causes, for the free market cause. And now we have Greg Lindsay and his CIS baboons and monkeys campaigning for carbon taxes. Oh yes, Lindsay, the questions over the reasons for this treachery are doing the rounds. Donors cutting off the ‘philanthropy’ is a pretty a good indication of how irritated various types are becoming.

The not  trivial matter of GDP aside, the rest of the article is not bad, and this paragraph nails an error by correcting it:

The reality is that cost estimates for climate legislation are as unreliable as the models predicting climate change. What comes out of the computer is a function of what politicians type in. A better indicator might be what other countries are already experiencing. Britain’s Taxpayer Alliance estimates the average family there is paying nearly $1,300 a year in green taxes for carbon-cutting programs in effect only a few years.

Cost estimates, as ‘climate modeling’ and, indeed, ‘economic’ modeling, is a futile exercise. The only predictor of what can unfold is solid economic theory. To repeat, Mr. Jackson of Brookesnews has laid it out from within an elegant, solid, impregnable body of theory the economic force of carbon taxation. He has not asserted estimates of costs and this is the correct thing. The evidence rolling in confirms the explanatory power and conclusions from sound theory. That evidence shows:

1. Carbon taxes have already caused tremendous destruction of capital

2. From 1, very many around the world are being made poorer, forced destitution is erupting as employees are thrown out of paying jobs because companies have been destroyed by carbon taxation.

3. The destruction of capital is compounding, unsurprisingly, as politicians persist with this savage crime against millions of firms and people. That, even without Obama imposing by totalitarian decree even more savage carbon taxes, unless stopped, many face a nightmare of a future. But Obama, and Kevin Rudd, Wayne Swann, Penny Wong, Peter Garrett, Bob Brown, Malcolm Turnbull, Greg Hunt, and the rest of the Green Cult worshiping Right are bent on ramming down carbon taxers. Not to overlook their record:

4. The Left and the Right in Victoria have already rammed down carbon taxation and they are causing real damage.

5. In Federal Parliament, the Right imposed carbon taxes in the form of ‘alternative energy’ frauds. One of these frauds, ethanol production, is destroying agricultural production in other countries.

6. The Right, and not only the Left, want to expand ethanol production. This means  stealing vast amounts of capital from Australians and destroying food production in Australia. The Costello-Kroger trumpeter, Andrew Bolt abuses his employer the Herald Sun and it’s readers by running propaganda for this starvation causing carbon tax - a violent criminal action is what it is.

Greg Lindsay and the Right spin the lie, subsidised entities are real businesses. A business is a market formation for the production of goods demanded. Entities set up on subsidies are not market formations at all. They are scams. The alternative energy schemes are not only scams. They are also carbon taxes destroying real capital in real firms that are economically efficient producers of energy, food, capital goods and all sorts of consumer goods.

7. The Right and the CIS have joined in the aim to destroy sound firms. David Kemp was one of the Right-wing Ministers who did much to bring this savagery about, as Minister of Voodoo the Environment:

8. David Kemp imposed extensive measures demanded by diseased Leftists and the fanatical, violent Greens. This idiot has the nerve and the gall to declare in public that he has fought the hard, diseased Left, and that he is the terror of the Left.

The Left do not merely laugh at this stupid bastard. The Left also acknowledge how well David Kemp served them as a Minister.

David Kemp’s record as a Liberal Party Minister reduces to:

- He’s betrayed the Liberal Party and helped his pals wreck it. The Victorian Division is finished, kaput, doesn’t exist, shot stone cold dead and buried some years ago by the Right. This is besides the work they did in preparing to usurp the inalienable Rights and backed Bracks and Brumby on completing this and this is only a couple of items of their thuggery in Victoria.

- With his HR Nicholls Society mates, Kemp is also culpable for the destruction of the campaign for free labour markets.

- They blew the Liberal Party out of the 2007 election waters and not in 2007. This success was complete by 2005!

- A Minister who never served modest Australians but, with his pals, the Right and the clunker tanks, has regarded modest Australians with undisguised contempt:

Smelly serfs to be abused and dictated to, taxed, punished.

This bastard has the hide to boast of how he has defended Liberty. And, this is what is the current President of the Victorian Division of the Liberal Party.

It is no longer the Victorian Liberal Party. It is the Right-wing clique, Toorak Brahman - Doctors’ wives Party,  headed by Clique Party boss Michael Kroger. That’s why the real membership has plummeted from around 30,000 to at best 1,000.

Choke on all of the above, Greg Lindsay, you treacherous, craven, gutless shit shoveler. The good news is, Greg Lindsay wears an attachment. It is an irremovable growth on his neck.

It is a monkey. It is Lindsay’s pet. It is paid for by Ron Manners. Its name is Bongo Drongo. Bongo Drongo is ape-speak for, John Humphreys. For the first time in my life I’ve enjoyed visiting a zoo and hadn’t realised it is a real zoo, and in Sydney! It is the CIS. Bonga, Bonga! Oo, oo, ooo!

Here is more on how destructive Obama’s carbon taxes will be:

Waxman-Markey: Man-Made Disaster, Investor’s Business Daily, 25/6/09

Fiscal Policy: The House of Representatives is preparing to vote on an anti-stimulus package that in the name of saving the earth will destroy the American economy. Smoot-Hawley will seem like a speed bump…

The 1,000-plus-page American Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454)…

It’s ‘OK’ for Islamo-Nazi terrorists to murder Israelis, firing rockets and sending in ’suicide bombers’, killing Israeli children in schools, in their homes and in the streets. Israel fights back, to eliminate terrorist cells, and that is called an “atrocity”. Israel, apparently, should lie back and serenely allow the Islamo-Nazis commit Holocaust II and supported by their great ally the UN. Meanwhile, in Australia, the media commentariat are doing their best to cover for the vermin whom the diseased Left portray as regular nice guys, who are ony victims of those hideous ‘occupiers’ of “Palestine”, Israel.

It’s not only Lying Leftist central either - ABC, and The Age aka “The Spencer Street Soviet”. Those who consider the Herald Sun and radio station 3AW as counters to the Left are in noddy land. 3AW ‘presenters’ daily wring their hands: “it’s all too complex”; “there must be a way to end the conflict”; “who is in the right”.

The real horror is Israel taking action against rodents. Needless to say, 3AW and the Herald Sun have also played up the latest ‘atrocity’, the wiping out of a Hamas terrorist hold, formally a UN school for ‘Palestinian’ children. The sheer laziness of ‘journalists’ is reflected in their confusion and their false sense of outrage and false pity. 

A firm grip on history is required for clarity, as one intellectual requirement. Absence of the modern disease of shallow, “moral equivalence” is another. Both covers things the idiot “Right” are also happily oblivious to.

As for the UN,  ’General Assembly President’ Miguel d’Escoto calling Israel’s defensive action an ’atrocity’ and a ”holocaust” perpetrated against the “Palestinians”, typifies the UN. De Escoto is a hater of the Jewish people, and here a few ripe facts summing this thug up:

 - He is a supporter of  Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

- He’s a Sandanista.  In the 1980’s, he was 

-  A long committed diseased Leftist, 1980s, d’Escoto was the foreign minister for the Sandinista regime, and sought to establish strong ties with the Soviet regime and Arab regimes. He established a PLO ‘embassy’ in Managua. They engaged in persecution of Jews in Nicaragua, who, understandably, fled the country. The Sandanistas deny the Holocaust was committed by the Nazi regime.

They are a few brief facts and some readers might opine they ‘prove nothing’. To the contrary, they square with the mountain of evidence condemning the UN.

Before crushing rotten eggs, let’s summarise some hard historical facts.

 History

Introduction 

The lie, Israel are occupiers of “Palestine” and drove them out of their country, is not only told by lying journalists and ‘academics’. It is mouthed by the man in the street, but he is excused, because he is not equipped to punch the truth through mud and slime. Sadly, neither are the “Right-wing” and their clunking think tanks the IPA and CIS, which defect is compounded by their gutlessness (they cower before hard leftists). A major influence that pushed the lie was lefist historians, zeroing in on in particular Marxist,Toynbee, who wove a complete tissue of lies in order to attack Israel and support the Arabs against Israel.

In, Jewish Rights in Palestine (1962), he began:

“In the current dispute over Palestine ,the immediate claimants are the Palestinian Arabs on the one side and the Jews now in Palestine on the other…”

He expanded on ‘now in Palestine’. He asserted, the Romans `exterminated’ the Jewish population of ‘Palestinian’ in the two Jewish-Roman wars. The Arabs succeeded as the ‘native inhabitants’.  Modern Israel, according to Toynbee, is a fiction without a shred of historical foundations to it, generated out of the Balfour Declaration of 1917, and Western guilt:

“if not for their (Germany) atrocities against the European Jews … there would not have been the pressure there was to turn palestine into an asylum for the jews…. The genocide was not committed by Arabs… Yet it is (they)…. who have been made by Germany’s fellow -Westerners, the Western Victors in the Second World War, to pay for Germany’s crimes.”

These two developments, according to Toynbee, created the opportunity for an intruder  Jewish population to take “Palestine” by conquest, overthrowing and expelling the ’native Palestinians’ in the 1940’s, and establish a bastard state called Israel. Toynbee’s account is not only a pack of lies purveyed as history, it involves a glaring contradiction coated in hypocrisy.

Ancient History 

The Roman Empire, according to Toynbee, ended the existence of Judaea. They conquered the Jews and thus they were no more an independent people, and their independent country was no more. They ceased to exist as an independent people.  This is a pack of lies. They ceased to exist. What, bye they way, of the previous Greek, Persian,Babylonian, Assyrian,and Egyptian periods?  Toynbee’s history is very peculiar.

Toynbee compared the Arab-Muslim conquest with the foundation of Jerusalem and Judaea as the country of the Jewish people, as accomplished by invasion and conquest.  He is speaking of the biblical wars of Joshua, with the kingdoms of Judaea and Israel, according to Toynbee. He asserted that it is arrant hypocrisy to accept the foundation of the Jewish people as legitimate but deny the same for the `Palestinian Arabs’. Since it is Toynbee who considers modern Israel was established only by conquest and yet declares Israel to be illegitimate, it is Toynbee who hung his hat on the rack of hypocrisy. It’s OK for others to trample over Jews but not the Jews?! No, not quite right; they did it once, long ago, but, hey, it’s not fair they do it twice, it’s the Arab’s turn.

He deliberately committed the fallacy of generalisation in order to prop up his home-spun account of  Jewish and Middle Eastern history. It is a rather strange notion at that:

Conquest is a means by which a conqueror not only takes over another country and asserts administrative control over it.  Conquest means the conquered no longer exist. This is certainly not true of Jewish history; Toynbee lied.

The conquered in the ancient middle East remained an independent people with their country theirs. They were bound only, under force of course, as vassal to the the Overlord King, formalised in vassal treaties. The terms specified conditions which the vassal King had to fulfil. Standard expressions included familiars like ‘brother’. The overlord would protect his brother/son , and do so for as long as the other ‘brother’ fulfilled his ‘brotherly’ obligations, which were the point of conquest, to extract taxes as ‘tribute’ from vassal kingdoms. 

Even the harshest, most brutal of vassal lords, the Assyrian, were no exception. The Assyrians were ever-ready to take direct administrative control of a vassal. They did this, however, in strict form.

Their tactic was to impose the harshest terms on a vassal, calculated to provoke revolt by the vassal. The Assyrians would mount a bloody campaign, completed with execution of prominent people and impose additional burdens. Vassal revolts provided the “legal” trigger to slaughter most of the ruling house and enough of the supporting aristocratic families and install their own administration . Yet, they never equated that with, ’that country is now mine; it and the people no longer exist. It is now Little Assyria.’ 

Under successive empires, noting the major differences between them, Judaea remained always the land of the Jewish people. The Roman Empire did not liquidate them, and it was not by any stretch of historical truth the aim of the Romans.

Neither were the Romans interested in interfering in their domestic affairs. Certainly there were restrictions, capital crime trials as an example. The Sanhedrin had no competence whatsoever on such matters, and so the the trial of Jesus - the pithy `King of the Jews’ amplifies why Pilate tried Jesus. The Roman empire was a military - adminstrative order, and was brutal, but the Romans did respect those with history behind them, including the Jewish people.

Toynbee lied about the cause of the two Roman-Jewish wars. They were brought on bys self-styled, to use modern expression, national liberationists. Bloodthirsty types such as the Siccari, with a totalitarian bent, who were far more odious and dangerous to Jews than Romans. As Josphesus attested,  the modest Jew wasn’t given to ‘nationalist’ wars, they were still independent, and it was understood, it only spelt misery for the Jewish people. and peace, but this did not stop the thugs busy press-ganging them into war against Rome. The Romans destroyed the Temple to put an end to such violent inclinations.

The crisis of the Judaeans was not a loss of independence and expulsion from Judaea. The Romans did not do this, it was still the land of the Jewish people. The crisis was the destruction of the Temple. It was one of the first major themes of the second great body of Jewish classical literature the Talmuds Babylon and Jerusalem, followed by the commentaries and tractates. These collections received their seminal departure point from the somewhat secular Mishne.

 Not only through the above empires but also, through the Arab and Turkic empires,  from c. mid 4th century c.e. to 1917, some 1,600 years of history. From the conclusion to the second Jewish-Roman war to 1917, ‘Palestine’ remained the Jewish country and Jerusalem their capital. Though, under Islamic rule, they were much reduced -their property could be confiscated; subjected to very high rates of taxation; persecuted; massacred by Allah’s butchers; all alleviated by the hilarity of being subject to bouts of mere mob violence. But, it was still the country of the Jewish people.

It should be noted, the Crusaders did not expel and overthrow the Jewish people, and  liquidate their country.

Damascus was the capital of the Arab world, Mecca its centre. The Arabs who conquered Jerusalem were composed of mainly the southern desert tribes and for the Arab empires, as also the Turkic empire, the interest was economic and military control. Palestine remained Jewish country and Jerusalem their capital all down those centuries, through to  1917 and on to the present.

The history of the Jews does not rest on ‘the Bible told me so’. The Bible is a collection of types of literature. The essential point is, the Jewish were not invaders. The history of the Jewish people and Israel stands on solid, secular ground. To use the expression - natives, they are the natives of what is called “Palestine”. Jerusalem is their ancient capital. The the historical fact is:

The ancient Jews were the original inhabitants of Judaea. In other words, Jewish history begins with that stark, mundane observation. Not invaders, not outsiders to the Jordanian defile from Cis- Jordan to trans- Jordan,  just the people who populated Judaea, whose dialect was Judahite. 

The Jewish people survived, endured the ructions of history as an independent people, with their capital and country intact. Descendants of other ancients, civilised nations of the ancient East have not fared so well, as their plight under Islamo-Arabic-fascist regimes shows - and the bleeding heart brigade care no more for these than they do for “Joos”.

It is time to blow up that monstrosity that now sits on the Mount. The Mount was the seat of the ancient Jewish kings. There is a wealth of material to be uncovered. I’ve had a very interesting eye-opener of a conversation with an archaeologist on this. 

20th century to the present

The Jews conquered and expelled “Palestinians” is a lie, just as it is a lie to say there is a distinct Palestinian people, when what is referred to is Arab Muslims. Toynbee couldn’t help himself, he had to re-write all of Jewish history to the 1960’s.

The Jews did not invade, conquer and drive out Arabs out of their country. Neither were Arabs who left Israel refugees, and their are still no refugees from modern Israel, contrary to the lying bastards in the UN and drivelling journalists in Australia. They volitionally left out of murderous motivations.

The Balfour Declaration of 1917 did not ‘create’ Israel ex nihilo or as a capricious act of Western governments. It merely reflected what was acknowledged by the League of Nations, the forerunner to the United Nations: “Palestine” is in fact the independent land of the Jewish people, it has never ceased being that. 

The League went further. It asserted that the Jewish people should be encouraged to build their economic interests, establish their own governance, should be encouraged to advance their traditions and practices and, Jews in other countries contemplating migration to the homeland of the Jewish people should be encouraged and welcomed. The Balfour Declaration merely formalised some of these crucial points, and the background to it was  Chauvel and Allenby put an end to the Turkic subjugation of Middle East countries. The League’s position was not only Israel but for all countries in the Middle East to re-emrge economically and re-establish their institutions. a

Toynbee lied on another count. The Arab world was not merely influenced by the ideas of the National Socialist regime led by Hitler. They drew on them to shape their pan Arabic version of National Socialism, including the extermination of the Jews and the destruction of Israel.  The trouble is, they were some years down the path before the full nightmare of what the Nazis were to commit was launched. Arab leaders were inciting Arabs long before the 1930’s and 40’s against Jews. An upshot was the massacre of the Jews of Hebron in 1929. This was 19 years before Israel’s declaration of independence in 1948.

The Arabs’ position was not a dispute conducted by gentlemanly Arabs against boorish, ingrate “Joos” over the future of “Palestine”. The Arab leaders crystallised and then drove the aim to exterminate the Jews and Israel, before 1948.  This, understandably, added urgency to realisation of Jewish Independence, it had become a matter of survival for the Jewish people.

It came to a head in 1948. Azam Pasha, Secretary General, Arab League, the Arab version of a U.N. delivered their great analysis of the ‘tensions’. His prescription for resolution was observed for decades and certainly remains in force for Islamo Nazis. The Cairo paper, Al-Ahran, was lovingly quoting Pasha in May 1962 when it cried:

“The Israel- Arab problem can be solved only by war. And since Israel knows very well that we will not agree to anything less than her liquidation it is she who will start the war and will attack as in the near future.”

The Arabs wanted all , the territory and the Jews exterminated. They backed Fauzi el Kaukji and his army to do it in 1948. Israel smashed Kaukji’s army. The response of the Arabs was to launch a second war against the Jewish people in 1948, in a coalition of five countries led by Egypt and Syria, which was defeated. In a single year, the Jews had survived two massive attempts of the Arabs to seize their land and perpetrate Holocaust II.

These facts alone are major killers of Toynbee’s lies.

The Arabs’ attempt to exterminate Israel was the excuse the United Nations used to carve up Israel. Amusingly, Israel did not oppose partition, the Arabs did.

The Arab ‘leaders’ created the faux refugee problem, starting in 1948 by calling upon Arab residents to leave Israel, on the promise that the army would massacre the Jews and they could, after the overwhelming victory resume their properties and take everything the Jews had built up. (What, after all, do the dead need of assets?). They also declared, any Arab who remained in Israel is a traitor. Any traitor could be killed by loyal Arabs.

In 1955 the Israeli government made a firm offer to compensate those Arabs for the assets they had abandoned. This was a promise they did not have to commit, as the above demonstrates. It kept the offer of compensation open, on the condition the former Arab residents integrate into the Arab world, with the assistance offered in 1955 to for that transition as well as restitution. In November 1960, the Israeli government instructed its ambassador to the U.N., Mr.Comay, to re-affirm the offer in an open, public declaration before the UN. McComay delivered it on the 28th to ’The Special Political Committee’, General Assembly, U.N.

In summary, the Israeli govt. did not dispossess Arabs of assets and lawful freedoms and expel them out of Israel. To the contrary, to the extent reasonable the Israelis offered to to honour those rights by compensation. The Israelis can be accused only of committing an act of generosity towards those who sought their extermination and seize all Jews’ property.

Yet, some were robbed of their rights, they were all Jews. In the wake of 1948, Arab govts. confiscated the assets of Jewish residents and expelled them from their countries and have never made any offer of restitution for those sequestered assets.  The worst was the Egyptian government, which robbed some 180,000 Jews of their property and drove them out of Egypt. The Iraq govt. put in a good effort too, robbing and persecuting 90,000 Jews.

The contrast runs deeper. The Israeli govt exhorted the Arabs not to leave but to stay and continue to add to the economic and general prosperity of themselves and Israel in general. The Israeli govt. and people did not seek the ruination of those Arabs and tried to convince them not to ruin themselves. 

Even to speak of Israeli intolerance of Arab residents is not stupid, it is a deliberate lie malevolently aimed against Jews and Israel. To speak of Israeli abuse of Arabs and oppression of Arabs is a vicious lie aimed at fuelling hatred of the Jewish people and modern Israel. That the UN foments such malevolent propaganda is only further evidence of the duplicity, mendacity, and all round rottenness of the UN, more so given the record of the stance of the Israeli govt. before the UN. Ditto lying Lefist journalists, as well as those merely dunces. These lies set in relief the patience and generosity of Israel towards Arab-Nationalists and their Islamo-Nazi ‘brotherhoods’, who only sought the best for Jews - extermination.

Which brings us to the PLO , it was founded by the Arab coalition to wage war against Israel by means other than army-based operations. The PLO was not a “spontaneous popular `liberation’ movement” by ”Palestinian Arabs”. Next to Arab govts. setting it up and financing it, the Stalinist Soviet regime also backed Arafat through the KGB, which also supplied PLO with intelligence against Israel.

With the raising of the PLO, the lie of a ‘native Palestinian people’ was spun for the obvious purpose, a propaganda stunt aimed at the West. It required the co-operation of agents of influence, and diseased Leftist journalists to pump it out. It worked.

Arafat was hailed in the West as a sainted uncle whose only crime was trying to ’save his people’ from Israelis. Half wits cried crocodile tears over the fate of “Palestinian refugees booted out of their homeland by cruel Jews”. The UN chipped in, beginning its still running, consistent record of condemning Israel as a house of butchers, passing resolutions by the truckloads saying, “Israel is a criminal bastard”. After the PLO, the development of additional terrorist cells shifted to firm anchorage in Islamo-fascist cells, as opposed to the pan-Arabist-muslim blanket orientation of the likes of the PLO. Thus sprung Hamas and Hezbollah, and supplied by Syria, Iran, and until smashed, the national Socialist Baath regime of Saddam Hussein. It’s blowing up in the faces of, for example, the Egyptians, who are now in as much danger from the monsters they have spawned as is Israel.

Conclusion to survey of Israel’s history

Compressing Jewish history into a brief survey is like squishing an elephant into a shoe box. The distinction between Bible and secular history, for example, should indicate one is alluding to a background built of exacting scholarhsip. Taking it down to the present points to what a thorough treatment entails. However, the above sketching of salient lines shows how extensive are the lies and fabrications told against Israel. Nothing much new has been added to Toynbee’s pack of lies, so it made for a good demonstration of a few hard facts.

The ‘arguments’ and ’claims’ made against Israel, and those made in order to support the enemies of Israel are false. The UN and Leftist liars peddle them. The only way to smash the diseased Left, is, as on economics, to eviscerate what they spew out as arguments. Only the armed can do this. The idiot ”Right” and their clunker tanks the IPA and CIS are not armed to fight on any ground, and their intellectual feebleness, as their efforts in economics demonstrates, only yields ground to the diseased Left and this is not warranted at all.

This article will be resumed tomorrow, in Part II.  

The only freedom the diseased Left defends is theirs. Other than this, it is control and subjection of everyone else. Not for them living according to their cultic beliefs and trusting that if they are onto a good thing others will imitate them volitionally. Well, they are nothing more than totalitarians. One of their major tactics to achieve what they aim at is the ‘take-over merchant’ tactic. The Church, a case study.

A lady related that as a teenager in the 1950’s she and her friends of a parish worked weekends, and held fundraisers in order to purchase a restorer’s dream, a run down weatherboard building. It had its good side, a pleasant seaside location. After the purchase, they raised more funds to pay for the renovations. On weekends and term breaks, they travelled to the site and, under local tradesmen laboured on the building. Their motivation? They did it to provide holidays for children of destitute parents who could not even afford to send their children away for a break. Don’t forget, Australia was deep in depression.

At the end of their last, weeklong effort of applying finishing touches, they held a barbecue to celebrate the new resort for children of the destitute. To their surprise, a cadre of twenty somethings turned up, in the name of their denomination, in time to party. These ‘blow-ins’, were as foreign to the Parish as they were to the work on the building. They helped themselves to the barbecue, the drink and started bossing the teenagers about in their own party. They held an unctuous prayer session at the end. The 20 somethings had a last trick up their sleeve. They concluded the damped celebrations by informing the Christians they were taking control of the holiday house and the teenagers “’were no longer needed”.

Neither were children of destitute parents, who might have enjoyed the vacation retreat. The 20 somethings used it for themselves. Who were these “holy Joes”? They were a new generation of diseased Leftists, who were infiltrating the Church, albeit a Protestant Church.

They were not old Marxists. They were the first of the emerging neo-Marxists. It’s an anecdote but sums up the institutional march of the Left. This and everything the diseased Left touches is poisoned and burned to stinking rubble. They seize control of what is good, spit on those who made it good, and destroy it beyond recognition. The Church has not been immune to the march of the diseased Left.

“The Australian Catholic Study Circle for Animal Welfare”, mentioned in two items below is only another minor outbreak of these parasites. What developed during the 1960’s has been nothing less than an internal war with the diseased Left. The problem for decent orthodox Christians is it has been fought out institutionally, and still is. There has been bad theological grip that has only conceded ground. Secondly, ignorance in other fields, the deadliest being economics. It shows. For now, we draw this out by what is certainly not a minor demonstration, the Society of St. Vincent de Paul.

In the late 1980’s to early 1990’s, the neo-Marxist 5th column completed their take-over of the Society of Vincent Paul with genuinely pious, Catholic, charitable members and non-members were shocked by their thuggery, but passed over the treachery in silence.

Once the Head office had been stuffed with the walking dead, things were changed swiftly. As an example, the kommissars expended funds on printing literature for use in the chapters of the Society. Neo-Marxist indoctrination literature, and written in the Dick and Dora grasp of English for good measure. This in itself is typical of how the diseased Left regard others, in undisguised contempt.

To check, their website is page to page neo-Marxist propaganda. The section titled,”Ethics” (ethics schmethics), is headed by assertion of the lie Co2 emissions causes global warming:

Ethics and climate changeOur moral obligation to take climate change seriously

Quoted is guru Flannery,

Climate change could also cause the extinction of one third of the species of the planet. According to Tim Flannery…

Besides fraud in science, statements such as these are to the point:

Behind these figures lies not just the death of possibly hundreds of millions of people

One of the first ethical principles is identifying those who are responsible for the damage caused by climate change. This principle states that a nation cannot use the excuse of minimising the cost to its own economy as an ethically acceptable excuse for failing to take action on greenhouse gas emissions that affect the whole planet.

Rich countries, which are mainly responsible for releasing
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere over the past 200 years, are obliged to pay compensation for climate change damages that are unavoidable. In a spirit of global solidarity they are also
morally bound to make resources and new technologies available to poor communities so that these countries…

Petrochemical corporations, especially Exxon-Mobile, have played
a very negative role in trying to pretendnthat climate change is not due to burning fossil fuel. Once again this excuse
transgresses basic ethical norms. When there is a possibility that activity, in this…

The only truthful point made is the great lies impact of Co2 on climate and it is a “pollutant”, is the objective behind the rush to controls, to undermine free market, capitalist west. The destitute, why they are destitute, and those living under brutal regimes are not the object of this unpious trash. The objective is, the West should be reduced to the squalor of hell holes on earth too. This piece of disgusting, shallow, false piety is an obscene insult to genuine Christians, and encapsulates the mendacity of the Leftist dictators at the helm of the Society:

know that climate change will have a terrible impact on the poor, the very people who did least to cause the problem in the first place. In the Magnificat, Mary tells us that God’s mercy reaches from age to age for those who fear him (Lk 1:50)….

Going back to the Religion Report interview for a moment, the intrepid Stephen Crittenden continued with his questions. He asked: “Would there be any need for those volunteers (referring to the members of the St Vincent de Paul Society) if Australia was a fair and just society?”

What sets them apart is the inequality of resources allocated to them by our society. Because we choose to stand in solidarity
with our sisters and brothers who have been pushed to the edge we come face to face with degradation and yet we are driven by a seemingly hopeless hope.

Where injustice, inequity, poverty or exclusion are due to inadequate or unjust legislation, the Society is required to speak out clearly against the situation.

It is common place for poor people to be treated badly by most business people.

The response required for this type of problem is not simple. It is a very complex one. It is not food, money, direction or
criticism. In some cases it would require a radical change to some of our social structures.

In today’s society there appears to be an economic monopoly which aims to become richer to the detriment of the
poor.

All politicians must strive to manage state affairs for the common good of all, which in itself demands a service in truth.

In asking the simple question about the causes of injustice we issue a prophetic call to all people of good will to work creatively to build equality and justice into our society.
The accumulation of wealth on the one hand is connected with the accumulation of poverty on the other, characterized by race, gender, age, disability, mental and physical illness, forced migration, homelessness, unemployment, insecure and poorly paid work and declining levels of social security and public infrastructure.

Here is someone else who is fed up with their neo-Marxist ‘clap-trap’:

The Society of St Vincent de Paul’s Marxist claptrap and its attack on the free market

He makes the same observation on the diseased Left’s favourite tactic -

There seems to be a law of the universe that states that any so-called independent organization whose existence can be used to attack capitalism will be eventually captured by the left and put to that purpose. The Catholic the Society of St Vincent de Paul seems to be striking proof of the existence of this law…

Regardless of what Marxist cultists at the Society of St Vincent de Paul would have people believe…

The economic savagery the cretins who control the Society claim is further illuminated by, for example, this by Augusto Zimmermann:

The Church is keeping Marx alive in Brazil and undermining the rule of law

The neo-Marxist bruvver-sistahood are parasites. They are not Christians at all. They have merely redefined the Christian confession into an anti-christian idolatary of totalitarianism. What they have done is totally debase the Society, having converted it into a Vehicle for themselves and their vile aims. Be sure of it, individuals, the genuinely destitute, and those enduring Stalinist and Islamo-fascist hell are mere inconvenient facts. Also inconvenient facts to this lot of liars is the immutable laws of economics they happily violate, not simply out of ignorance, but out of contemplation of the hell they desire be unflicted on Australians and millions around the world.

Again, the supine and stumped bungling “Right” are at a total loss as to what such types are really about, and how to fight them. Sadly, so are genuinely apostolic clergy - but this is because they are not intellectually armed at all.

A list of not at all patriotic Australians who fully support Chavez was reproduced in,

Bob Brown is not alone “Down-under” in his devotion to Chavez

What ‘country’ do they belong to - really owe allegiance to?

Besides, for example, “Phuc Phil” Adams, Bob Brown, and ACTU heavies, there are also Kerry Nettle, also an Australian Greens Senator for NSW, and Keysar Trad - “Islamic Friendship Association”.

Two bolts of the Greens’ policies are: ‘legalisation of drugs and giving Chavez free entry into Australia. They also, as does for example Federal ALP member Irwin, back the Islamic terrorist slum euphemistically called the “Palestinian Territory”.

Nettle hasn’t received all she deserves but she was booted out of the Senate in the 2007 election. She gave her “valedictory” yesterday. Apart from thinly disguised Stalinist bilge, a few passages are illuminating. She declares ASIO’s capacity to take out Islamic terrorists and allies inside Australia should be elmininated. Secondly, running the lie the Palestinian Territory is the historical land of the fictional ‘Palestinians’, rather than carved out of Israel by ‘international’ fiat to estbalish the umpteenth Arab-Muslim ‘nation’, she does not conceal hatred of Israel and that Islamo fascists should be allowed to wipe Israel off the face of the earth:

We have seen an incredible onslaught of laws about
terrorism since September 11 …. we have got a lot of work to do to get laws like sedition off our law books, to ensure that people are not detained without trial and not questioned incommunicado by ASIO for a week.

Earlier this year in the parliament, we had the government and the opposition moving a motion in relation to the 60th anniversary of Israel but we had no mention about what that experience has meant for the Palestinians. If we want to constructively contribute towards peace and addressing the big conflicts …. then we need to play a constructive role rather than being so keen to ensure that Israelis understand that our government supports them. We need to stand up for things like UN Security Council resolutions …. We want a just peace in the Middle East and we recognise the flow-on consequences that it is going to have for the international community.

(Hansard, 25/06/08)

Yah, stab Israel in the back. Bob Brown praised her for the “wunnerful hooman bean” she is. Of course she is as is any Stalinist thug bent on the destruction of Israel and wiping out Australians through environmentalism, and supporting narcotic kingpins and terrorist bosses. Brown also admires what a ‘wunnerful’ Bush and America hate monger Nettle is, “Oh, shucks, snookums”:

I remember you standing up in the other chamber when President Bush was speaking to represent a strong voice in Australia ….

You have been campaigning with groups who have been in the minority in this country, and you have seen the progress of those people to the forefront, particularly on social justice and environmental issues in this nation. I thank those who have supported you, and I am buoyed by the thought that you are now going to have much more time for them and be much closer to them.

All I can say is: thank you for being such a wonderful friend. Thank you for being such a fine intellect.

Thank you for being such an honourable person. Thank you for being such a great advocate for many people who otherwise would not have had a voice in this representative parliament. You are a splendid human being. (Ibid.)

Those who supported Nettle need a good flogging.

Shakespeare acutely depicted scumbags harp on about how honourable they are. Macbeth was sad when he discovered few of the oppressed his subjects shared the sentiment, and then he was dead.

It is no suprise at all to see Trad’s name in that “who’s who” list of the diseased Left; Islamo fascists are on the same side. It is worth recollecting another of Trad’s fellow travellers. In 2006 the Herald Sun reported on one of Steve Bracks’ intimate friends, Eideh.To strip down an earlier post:

A close pal of Steve ‘Brezhnev’ Bracks, Lindsay Tanner, and Liz Beattie

Having instigated the persecution of the two Pastors, Bracks’ jackbooted Commissars took refuge behind a bit of gobble-de-gook when the editor of Brookes News directly challenged, EOC and VCAT:

“Mr Joe Cambria emailed my article to Dr Helen Szoke Chief Executive Officer of the Equal Opportunity Commission Victoria. Her Reply was interesting in what it revealed about the Star Chamber proceedings of her Orwellian commission.”

Eideh is a close pal of Steve ‘Brezhnev’ Bracks, Lindsay Tanner, and Liz Beattie. Eideh fully supports a major funder of Islamo-Nazi terrorism, the President of Syria and his regime.

Eideh owns Blue Star Logistics, a large trucking company. According to the H.S., he is also a bigamist, having a wife in Melbourne and a wife in Syria. Bracks gave his full support to Eideh standing at the 2006 State Parlaiment election for a safe ALP seat. The H.S. also unloaded these bombs:

Eideh wrote an open letter published in an Arab newspaper in 2002 declaring: “ Satan brigades are getting ready to enslave the Arab world…” He “praised the martyrs’ in the same letter. There are no prizes in guessing who the `martyrs’ might be, as well as none for surmising who the brigades of Satan are.

In a second letter to Assad, October 2002, written “a few months before the start of the war against Saddam, he stated;
be aware of “ Zionist and colonial attacks on the Arab nation”.
He ended the letter by sycophantically praising Assad.

In another letter to the Syrian, June 2001, he gave his evaluation of the political influence of Syrians resident in Melbourne. He concluded they have none, for now anyway. The H.S. related, Eideh serves the Syrian regime as an informer. He collects information on Syrian residents who “harbor ill-will towards the Syrian Arab republic”.

Eideh gave not at all plausible excuses for his unambiguous statements, and his activities as an informer or, to call a spade a spade, a spy for a hostile regime.

Under the Blasphemy ‘law’, it is a criminal offence to say anything the “Junta” of Brackistan doesn’t like. It is also a criminal offence for any Victorian to say anything the Junta and its Commissars dislike outside of Victoria. It is a crime to say anything against Islam and favoured cults. Hmmm, attacking the Greens for the death cult it is and also socialism must, by definition, be violation of the ‘law’.

Cardinal Pell resides in Sydney because of his job, but he is a Victorian. Under the Act, Brumby, Hulls and their goons must arraign Cardinal Pell. Pell attacked Islam and environmentalism for being nothing less than evil, destructive cults. According to the Blasphemy ‘Law’, Pell is a hardened felon. Brumby, Hulls, Sisel, Helou, and Szoke must arrest Pell, prosecute him, convict him, and throw him into prison for candily making a few points about Islam. A very amusing situation, since Steve “blubber-mouth” Bracks raised the Blasphemy Law, and is a Roman Catholic.

Szoke on radio, 3AW, contrasted the Western Australian regime’s Blasphemy ‘Law’. She proudly stated: “We have a much higher threshold than the W.A. Act.” Just love the use of `We’, a moment of rare candour. In common law, there is no ‘blasphemy’ principle and no “threshold”.

She candidly (though not intentionally)stated the Act’s purpose. It is the imposition of the personal beliefs of the “Junta” by the use of Secret Police State thuggery and coercion, and subservience also to Islamo-fascist thugs. So far, the Inquisition has tried someone for hurting the feelings of a ‘witch’ by uttering “Ooga booga”, and the two Pastors for a really evil crime - upsetting allies of the treacherous Left.

Under the Act, the Commissars’ for Right Speech and Thinks must arraign Eideh before their court, try him, convict him and fling him into prison. For, Eideh not only committed treason by supporting the Syrian regime, a regime that is striving to realise one of the aims of Islamo-Fascists, destruction of Israel and extermination of Jews in a second Holocaust.

Eideh has written material fomenting hatred of the Jewish people, for being Jews. The statement, ‘Zionist attacks on the Arab world’, is unambiguous in force. The statement is more than a nasty remark against Jews. Zionism detonates on both the gentilic usage of Jew and its use by those filled with hatred of the Jewish people.

Letters such as Eiedeh’s, published in an Arab newspaper in the Middle East, have great impact there. Arab-Muslim media regularly publishes material attacking Israel, the Jewish people, and calling for their destruction. Eideh’s letter, since he wrote as an ‘Australian’, is more than disturbing.

It should be remembered, it was the Syrian regime that dreamt up the fraud of publishing cartoons mocking Islam and attributing them to Westerners. They succeeded with the aim, to stir Muslims against the West, and Israel into violent action.

Eideh’s pals - Bracks, Tanner and Beattie, cannot be ignorant of Eideh’s activities and hatred of the Jewish people. They are close pals of his, not strangers, nor mere acquaintances, but firm, intimate friends.

While Bracks, Hulls, Brumby and their Commissars, persecuted the two Pastors, and order Victorians to make obesiance to bloody Mohammed and his devotees, he all along has been bosom buddies with a Muslim who is a bigamist, a supporter of the terrorist regime of Syria, a fomenter of hatred against Jews, and spies on Melbournian Syrians who are opposed to the Syrian Regime. It also should be remembered that regime’s actions inside Lebanon, including assassinations of those who oppose Islamo fascist terrorists. Bracks, Brumby and Hulls are hypocrites, liars, and totalitarian scumbags.

Given the gravity of the contents of Eideh’s letters, and his actions, Sisel, Szoke and Helou, under the Act, have no choice in the matter. They must arraign, try, convict and imprison Eideh, His statements are a truly heinous ‘vilification’ of Jews, and the West. Will they? Of course not, that would be a contradiction of why the ‘law’ was imposed.

Paul Keating in the 1980’s arranged for instant bestowal of naturalisation on muslim migrants, to build up another voting block. It was well known that they included some very savage types. ASIO has had its hands full dealing with them; ASIO has been very effective in taking out terrorist cells set up by some of them. This is what, as Nettle stated, the Greens and their allies in the other Parties wish to stop.

There is a problem in combating Islamo-Fascists in Australia.

The problem is the diseased Left.

The list of names cited in the intorduction discloses this: there are those in important institutional positions who support, cover and protect Islamo - Fascists, and also support and cover Stalinist regimes such as that of Cuba and Chavez’s. There are those institutionally protected, such as Unions, who use their muscle to advance what is nothing less than treachery. Then, in a league of its own, there is the regime of Brackistan.

Chavez is a great boon to the Left. He funds and trains both Islamic terrorists, Marxist terrorists, aids the terrorist camp called the Palestinian Territory, supports the Greens, and deals out more mass murder via narcotics. There is one bit of sure news guaranteed to upset the scumbags:

Israel will attack the regime of mullahs in Iran. Israel will not give that lot of savage killers the chance to destroy Israel with nuclear weapons and commit a second Holocaust: Israel Attack on Iran ‘Unavoidable’: Olmert Deputy (6/6/08). (This great news has also upset the Democrats.)

The diseased Left, Irwin, and Nettle join in the UN fun sport of bashing Israel and calling them Nazis. Israel’s crime, according to the Left, is fighting and taking out those who butcher Israelis.

The very reason Arafat and his terrorist cells were established by Arab regimes and the KBG was to exterminate the Israelis. They generated the lie of the “Palestinian Territory” and it was spewed out by the Left dominated media. That was the origin of Hezbollah, the common link between Chavez, the enemy in the East, and the treacherous Left in Australia.

Bob Brown, Nettle, and Irwin are not fit and proper to hold a seat in any Parliament in Australia, nor any others of the same ilk. As for Spring Street… a complete gutting is required, including the usless cretins occupying the few precious Liberal seats in the defunct Parliament of Australia (defunct because Victoria is Brackistan).